Metodologia e "case studies" per la valutazioned'impatto sanitario in grandi aree industriali
-
Upload
wwf-italia -
Category
Engineering
-
view
391 -
download
3
Transcript of Metodologia e "case studies" per la valutazioned'impatto sanitario in grandi aree industriali
Metodologia e “case studies” per la valutazione d’impatto sanitario in
grandi aree industriali. L’approccio dell’OMS
Roberto Bertollini MD MPH Chief Scientist and WHO Representative to the EU Brussels, Belgium
Outline • The WHO environment and health
framework • Industrial sites and health: a european
issue • Case studies: methodological challenges
and interpretation • Conclusions
Outline • The WHO environment and health
framework • Industrial sites and health: a european
issue • Case studies: methodological challenges
and interpretation • Conclusions
The Fifth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health
Environment and Health in Europe:
Fifth Ministerial Conference Parma, Italy, 10-12 March 2010
WHO Regional Office for Europe
Photo G. Basilico Photo Carra
Priorities from Parma Conference We are committed to act on the key environment and health challenges of our
time. These include: (a) the health and environmental impacts of climate change and
related policies; (b) the health risks to children and other vulnerable groups posed by
poor environmental, working and living conditions (especially the lack of water and sanitation);
(c) socioeconomic and gender inequalities in the human environment and health, amplified by the financial crisis;
(d) the burden of noncommunicable diseases, in particular to the extent that it can be reduced through adequate policies in areas such as urban development, transport, food safety and nutrition, and living and working environments;
(e) concerns raised by persistent, endocrine-disrupting and bio-accumulating harmful chemicals and (nano)particles; and by novel and emerging issues;
(f) insufficient resources in parts of the WHO European Region.
The Fifth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health Parma, Italy 10-12 March 2010
Outline • The WHO environment and health
framework • Industrial sites and health: a european
issue • Case studies: methodological challenges
and interpretation • Conclusions
About 250,000 sites in European Environment Agency-‐EEA member countries are defined as requiring clean up (h?p://themes.eea.europa.eu/)
Sources of contaminaFon in soil and water of European contaminated sites
http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/breakdown-of-activities-causing-local-soil-contamination
Industrial sites and health • Large concentrations of industrial facilities
– Chemical, petrochemical – Waste treatment – Power generation – Heavy industry, manufacture – …
• Environmental impacts on: – Air – Water – Soil – Food (fruit and veg, meat, fish) – Noise – Activities (e.g., transport) – …
Outline • The WHO environment and health
framework • Industrial sites and health: a european
issue • Case studies: methodological challenges
and interpretation • Conclusions
Studi OMS “Aree a rischio”
1. Rapporto Ambiente e Salute in Italia pubblicato nel 1997 (dati 1980-87)
2. Studio di mortalità 1990-94 (2002) • confondimento
socioeconomico, • analisi spaziali e temporali • stima di impatto
Studying health effects: exposure • Occupational vs environmental • Many (mixed) contaminants • Many exposure pathways • Often low quality/resolution data
– Emissions – Concentrations – People’s mobility and activities
• Difficult to identify an exposure gold standard for
• Residential information often used
Kidney cancer, men municipalities of Caserta district
Geographical distribution of the Risk applying a Standard indicator
(Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR))
Geographical distribution of the Risk applying a Smoothed indicator
(Bayesian Hierarchical Estimator (BMR))
Number of municipalities
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
-2
0 2
4 Lo
ess
(dis
tanc
e, s
pan
= 0.
1)
____ Risk function ------ IC 95%
# # ####
##
# ###
# ## ## #### # # ## ## # ##
# ### # ##
## #
##
# #
#
##
# ##
# ##
#
#
#
# ##
# ## ## # # #
##
## ##
#
#
# # ##
# # ## # ## #
# # #
# #
#
# # ### #
### #
# #### #
###
# ##
## #
#
####
#
##
#
#
#
# #
#
#
###
##
##
# ##
#
#
#
##
#
#
##
# ## #
#
# #
##
#
##
##
#
#
###
##
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
#
##
#
## #
#
#
#
#
#
#
Basse di Stura landfill
Bladder cancer - men
Distance from the landfills (mt)
Cases by census tracts
Area of Massa Carrara (2 municipalities)* Mortality: chronic respiratory diseases
Men: 90% of RRs between 43.2 and 143.7 Homogeneity test: p < 0.01
Women: 90% of RRs between 59 and 149.8 Homogeneity test : p < 0.01
*Circle with radius of 26 km and centre in Massa (38 munic.)
Men Women
> 125 (10) 110-125 (0) 90-110 (7) 75-90 (6) 0-75 (15)
> 125 (15) 110-125 (2) 90-110 (4) 75-90 (2) 0-75 (15)
SMRs SMRs
> 125 (3) 110-125 (4) 90-110 (19) 75-90 (12) 0-75 (0)
> 125 (1) 110-125 (3) 90-110 (25) 75-90 (8) 0-75 (1)
EBRs EBRs
0
Km
10 20
0
Km
10 20
Area of Massa Carrara: respiratory diseases - men
1920 1925 1930 1935 1940
Cohort of birth
7.05
6.09
5.1
4.01
1.36
Cum
ulat
ive
risk
% (0
-64)
0 2
4 6
8 10
12
What health endpoints? • Need to consider broad spectrum
– Short- and long- term – Severe (mortality, cancer, hospital admission)
and less severe (respiratory conditions) – Mostly a-specific
• Strong competing determinants involved – Occupational vs environmental – Lifestyle – Predispostion – Quality of health care
Pirastu R & Comba P. E&P 35 (5-‐6) se?embre-‐dicembre 2011 Suppl.2
298 municipaliFes
5,551,878 residents at 2001 Census
North
Central
South and Islands
44 Italian Polluted Sites in SENTIERI Project. MunicipaliFes and residents by geographic macroarea
SENTIERI: Summing up
• 9,969 excess deaths in 8 years, ie 1,200/year
• 2.5% increase in mortality, compared to regional backgrounds
Interpretation
• Mix of occup. and environmental exposures – Airborne – Water- and foodborne – Indirect: stress
• Competing risk factors for mortality excess – Residual socio-economic confounding – Lifestyle – Quality of secondary prevention
and health care
• Difficult to assess “attributable” risk, but…
…we have a partial view • “Softer” health outcomes
– Morbidity – Hospital admission – Reproductive effects
• Quality of life near industrial areas – Psychosocial effects – Smell – Noise – Impact on landscape
Questions • What is the health profile of resident
populations, as described by mortality and morbidity?
• What is the contribution of environmental contamination?
• How does it interplay with other health determinants?
• How far can well being be addressed? • What implications for remediation, clean
up, future development?
Expert consultation
http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/ 186240/Contaminated-sites-and-health.pdf
• Three expert meetings, 2011-12 • Case studies • Priorities, interests, needs • Methodological options • Environmental characterisation • Data availability • Exposure assessment • Biomonitoring (separate report) • Health impacts
WHO work in Sicily • Starts in 1995, with MoE • Since 1996, with projects
funded by Regional Govt • Aims
– Describe health profile of residents
– Advise on env remediation • Invoved strong partnerships
– ISS, CNR, research centres, – OER, Cancer Registries,
Universities, …
General objectives • Updated of health profiles of local
populations • Integrated exposure assessment • Role of food chain as a vehicle for human
exposure • Consolidation of European scientific
network on contaminated areas • Sicilian data in international context;
Consolidate European network
Support to policy and governance • Question: “What is the health impact of
industrial site?” • Includes but is not limited to:
– What is the impact of contaminant X? • Aims at identifying and promoting health-
friendly policies – Early adoption of clean technologies and
alternatives – Abatement of emissions – Clean-up of contaminated areas – Protection of vulnerable groups
Broader assessments needed • “Hard” health impacts • Vulnerability to accidents • Quality of life near industrial areas
– Smell – Impact on landscape – Psychosocial effects – Property values – Selective migration patterns – Environmental justice – …
• Lead: an “evergreen” • Large burden of disease in Europe • Clean up in Zg Mežiška dolina, mining site,
Slovenia – contaminated for centuries (Otorepec et al, 2013)
Remediation works
R = H + O • Sandman’s formula: Perceived risk = Hazard + Outrage • “Outrage” factor always high in contaminated sites • The 12 principal components of outrage (P Sandman, 2003).
“Safe” “Risky” 1. Voluntary Coerced 2. Natural Industrial 3. Familiar Exotic 4. Not memorable Memorable 5. Not dreaded Dreaded 6. Chronic Catastrophic 7. Knowable Unknowable 8. Individually controlled Controlled by others 9. Fair Unfair 10. Morally irrelevant Morally relevant 11. Trustworthy sources Untrustworthy sources 12. Responsive process Unresponsive process
Outline • The WHO environment and health
framework • Industrial sites and health: a european
issue • Case studies: methodological challenges
and interpretation • Conclusions
International WHO network
• Contaminated sites are a significant public health issue in many countries in Europe and beyond
• Many experiences, but heterogeneous: definitions, priorities, needs, methodology and international comparisons difficult
• Public health and environmental agencies both engaged – more cooperation beneficial
• Request of common approaches and tools for: – Health impact assessment, i.e. define health risk/profiles of populations living
close to contaminated sites – Environmental monitoring and Epidemiological surveillance, i.e. verify the
effectiveness of remediation activities and Public Health interventions
Objectives of the WHO network • Production of guidelines:
– data – methodology – interpretation – communication
• Develop methodology • Development of training modules • Carry out studies (within and between countries,
including on children)
Conclusions • Contaminated sites are a relevant public health issue –
not fully appreciated • An acute case of EH inequalities and environmental
injustice • Literature is sparse • Rich available methodology for analysis • Integrate better across disciplines (eg, biomonitoring) • Invest in more inclusive approaches • Strengthen international collaboration
à WHO Collaborating Centre established at ISS in 2013 (Director, I Iavarone)