Mercury & GCAP

21
Mercury & GCAP Nicole Smith-Downey, Noelle Eckley Selin, Chris Holmes, Bess Sturges, Daniel Jacob Harvard University Elsie Sunderland US EPA Sarah Strode, Lyatt Jaegle University of Washington

description

Mercury & GCAP. Nicole Smith-Downey, Noelle Eckley Selin, Chris Holmes, Bess Sturges, Daniel Jacob Harvard University Elsie Sunderland US EPA Sarah Strode, Lyatt Jaegle University of Washington. Phytoplankton. Zooplankton. Planktivorous fish. Piscivorous fish. Bf ~ 10 4. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Mercury & GCAP

Page 1: Mercury & GCAP

Mercury & GCAP

Nicole Smith-Downey, Noelle Eckley Selin, Chris Holmes, Bess Sturges, Daniel JacobHarvard University

Elsie SunderlandUS EPA

Sarah Strode, Lyatt JaegleUniversity of Washington

Page 2: Mercury & GCAP

Why Hg?Phytoplankton Zooplankton Planktivorous fish Piscivorous fish

Bf ~ 104 Bf ~ 105 Bf ~ 106 Bf = 106–107

Reduction in intelligence, reduced reproductive success, brain, liver and kidney damage

Biomagnification of MeHg in the food web impacts global human and animal health

Page 3: Mercury & GCAP

Wet & DryDeposition 2600

ATMOSPHERE5000

(3x pre-industrial)

SURFACE SOILS1,000,000 OCEAN

289,000

Wet & DryDeposition1900

Oceanic Evasion

1500

Net burial200

Land emissions1600

Quantities in Mg/year (106 g, or metric tonnes)Uncertainty ranges in parenthesesAdapted from Mason & Sheu, 2002

AnthropogenicEmissions 2400

Extraction from deep reservoirs2400

Rivers200

(1800-3600) (700-3500)(1680-3120)

(1680-3120)

(1300-2600)(700-3500)

The Mercury Cycle

Page 4: Mercury & GCAP

Hg in GEOS-Chem (current simulation)• Coupled land-atmosphere-ocean (pre-industrial

and present)• OH, O3 oxidation, reduction; sea-salt uptake of

Hg(II)• Wet & dry deposition adjusted to match MDN

observations• 2nd generation ‘under construction’

– Halogens as possible oxidant (Holmes)– New mechanistic terrestrial Hg model linking the lifetime

of Hg in the environment to carbon pools (Smith-Downey)

– New oceanic Hg model including deeper ocean layers (Sunderland)

Page 5: Mercury & GCAP

IPCC Emissions Scenarios for SO2

Emissions Scenarios

Page 6: Mercury & GCAP

Atmospheric chemistry & dynamics

Wet deposition of Hg over US Selin

Possible changes• Patterns in precipitation• Transport• Clouds (Hg(II) -> Hg0)• Wind speed & sea salt• T dependence of Rxns• Feedbacks from other

changes in chemistry

Page 7: Mercury & GCAP

Plan of Action• Changes in dynamics and their

influence on Hg deposition can be analyzed by the current model

• Changes in chemistry (OH, O3) may influence Hg, but uncertainties in those effects are large

Page 8: Mercury & GCAP

Ocean uptake and evasion

Strode 2006

Possible Changes• Hg solubility (T)• Wind speed• Mixed layer depth• NPP

- (Hg(II) -> Hg0)- particulates

• Memory of past emissions

Page 9: Mercury & GCAP

Plan of Action

• Architecture of current model will lead to rapid equilibration with changes in T and deposition– Can be used to examine first order

effects of T, wind speed and deposition

• Deeper ocean model will greatly increase our ability to predict future ocean response to change– Sunderland

Page 10: Mercury & GCAP

Sea Ice - Halogens - and MDE’s

Sea ice extent

Page 11: Mercury & GCAP

Plan of Action• Current standard model does not

include halogens– Holmes

• Possible effects are large, but uncertainties in the interaction between Br, sea-ice and Hg will limit our predictive capabilities

Page 12: Mercury & GCAP

Hg in the terrestrial biosphere

Hg0Hg(II)oxidation

reduction

Binding to organic ligands

litterfallthroughfall(wet)

Hg0

Hg(II)

Hg(II)aq

Page 13: Mercury & GCAP

Biomass Burning

•Changes in fire frequency and intensity expected•Net loss of stored Hg from soils - especially in Arctic•Weidenmeier et al. (in press) estimate domestic BB emissions are nearly equal to primary emissions from coal combustion

Turetsky et al 2006Gillet et al 2004

Page 14: Mercury & GCAP

Soil Respiration• Soil respiration is temperature and moisture

dependent• Decomposition of organic soils will release

stored Hg to the atmosphere– Kirshbaum 1995 suggests 10% C loss in areas

with a MAT = 5C• Because the pool of soil Hg is large, even

small changes in the lifetime will have a significant impact on land emissions

Page 15: Mercury & GCAP

Plan of Action• Architecture of current

model will lead to rapid equilibration with changes in T and deposition

• New land model will allow us to account for new emissions from respiration and biomass burning– Smith-Downey

Spracklen - Harvard

Predicted Biomass Burning

Page 16: Mercury & GCAP

Emissions

Climate

Chemistry

?

Page 17: Mercury & GCAP
Page 18: Mercury & GCAP
Page 19: Mercury & GCAP

Why Hg?Phytoplankton Zooplankton Planktivorous fish Piscivorous fish

Bf ~ 104 Bf ~ 105 Bf ~ 106 Bf = 106–107

MeHg loading of birds and mammals has increased over time

Hg in Polar Bear Hair Hg in Bird Feathers

Dietz 2006 Thompson 1992

Page 20: Mercury & GCAP

Sea Ice - Halogens - and MDE’s

Depends on addition of Halogen chemistry and some link to sea ice/snow

Page 21: Mercury & GCAP

The Mercury Land ModelHg(II) dry Hg0

dry

atm

osph

ere

Veg

etat

ion/

Soi

l sur

face

Soi

ls

Hg(II) wet

Hg(II) dry Hg0 dry

Hg(II) orgHg(II) aq

Hg leaf

(1) (2) (3)

(4)(5) (6)

(8) (9)

(10)(11)

(7)