MEMS: Microelectromechanical Systems - IEEE · 3 Introduction • MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical...
Transcript of MEMS: Microelectromechanical Systems - IEEE · 3 Introduction • MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical...
1
A. D. Yarbrough, PhDEngineering & Technology Group
The Aerospace CorporationEl Segundo, CA20 March, 2001
Sponsored byIEEE Distinguished Lecturer Series
&The Aerospace Corporation New Technology Overview Series
MEMS: MicroelectromechanicalSystems
2
Outline• Introduction and Context• MMIC and MEMS Synergy
– Heritage & Definitions– Processing
• Structures Motivated by Space Applications• Advantages and Disadvantages• Summary & Conclusion• References, Resources & Acknowledgments
3
Introduction• MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical Systems):
miniature devices with elements achieved by 2-and 3-dimensional silicon micromachining
• Identify MEMS applications relevant to satelliteand mobile communication systems– Highly integrated circuits leveraging
» RFIC/MMIC (RF and monolithic microwave integratedcircuit) technology
» Mature semiconductor industry fabrication techniquesdeveloped over 30+ years
– Innovative packaging– Greater emphasis on reliability
» Characterization of MEMS materials properties and testing
4
• Leverage and combine technology strengths to synthesizehigh-performance, compact, cost-effective subsystems
• Apply MEMS technologies to achieve– higher levels of integration in millimeterwave
communications components– miniaturization AND integration of electronic and
mechanical components on same chip» leads to reduced subsystem volume, weight and cost
– increase performance per mm2 of wafer surface area• Develop semiconductor processes and capabilities to
enable fabrication of novel MEMS structures• Leverage in-house capabilities to advance the state of the
art in MEMS for space applications
Motivation
5
The Nanosatellite Concept
From work of S. W. Janson, H. Helvajian & E. Y. Robinson, The Aerospace Corporation
6
Aerospace/DARPA MEMS PicoSat Mission
PicoSat1
PicoSat2
PicoSat3
OPAL (Orbiting PicoSatAutomated Launcher)
150-ft diameter TrackingEarth Station AntennaSRI, International, Palo Alto, CA
Two communicatingon-orbitspace stations
100-ft tether
Comm link betweeneach PicoSat& ground station
Data Acquisition& Control PC
Comm link betweenPicoSats
NOTES:1. Drawing Not to Scale2. Three-week space station battery life3. Space stations referred to as “PicoSats”4. 902-928 MHz, 100mW max transmit power
750 kmAltitude
PicoSats ejectfrom OPAL
On-boardMEMS switchexperiments
7
PICOSAT Goals and Applications
• PICOSAT as a Space Test Vehicle– MEMS and microsystems space technology– Testing, development, demonstration,
insertion• PICOSAT as part of operational
architecture– MEPSI (MEMS based PICOSAT Inspector)– Communications networks– Remote sensing networks– Cooperative constellations and phased arrays– On orbit robotics developments
8
Merits of PICOSATs and Nanosats• Benefits
– Lower cost» Reduced fabrication and testing costs» Reduced integration and launch costs
– Rapid development and adaptation to payloads– Easily accommodated (ride-along) on any host
vehicle– Frequent flights (target 2 - 3 flights per year or
more)• Current Limitations
– Power, downlink (trade power for large groundantenna)
» Power source, data transfer rates
9
First PicoSat Flight
• Jan 26, 2000 OSP1/Minotaur launch from VAFB– Two Minuteman stages, two Pegasus stages (first flight)
• JAWSAT– Successful deployment of OPAL, ASUSat1, FalconSAT
• Feb 6 deployment of PICOSATs from OPAL– Two tethered PICOSATs: 1 x 3 x 4 in., 270 gms each– Followed by STENSAT, Artemis PICOSAT deployments
• PICOSAT three-day mission (Feb 6-9)– Successful tracking and acquisition strategy– Successful two-way command and communications– MEMS switch operation data returned to Earth
10
OSP (Orbital SubOrbital Program)/Minotaur* Launch Vehicle
MMFS
M56A
MMSS
SR19
Orion50XL
JAWSATOrion 38
*Modified Minute Man Missile
11
PicoSat Mission Photos
PicoSats PicoSats under test in anechoicchamber at Aerospace Corporation
OPAL: Orbiting PicoSat Automated Launcherunder test at Stanford University’s Space SystemsDevelopment Laboratory
PicoSats being loaded into OPAL
12
PicoSat Mission Photos
PicoSat ground station:SRI (Palo Alto) 50-m diameterdish
Ground PicoSat mounted on antenna feed
13
MEMS/MMIC Synergy• Silicon micromachining has emerged as an
extension of IC fabrication technology• 30+ years of experience and process technology to
build upon• Recipes highly consistent with capabilities of
techniques and equipment present in a modestIC/MMIC fab facility
• Responds to need to integrate varied circuittopologies or interface miniaturized mechanicalcomponents with electronics
14
• MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical Systems):miniature devices with elements achievedby 2- and 3-dimensional siliconmicromachining
• Bulk micromachining: use of wet & dryetching techniques, etch masks and etchstops to sculpt microelectromechanicaldevices from silicon substrate
Definitions and Terminology
15
• Sacrificial layer: spacer layer in which structuralparts of device are encased; subsequentlydissolved away; used to produce released* or free-standing structures
• Surface micromachining: use of successivedeposition and patterning of structural andsacrificial materials on a substrate to fabricatemicroelectromechanical components (no substrateetching)
*released: structures suspended over a substrate by etchingaway the intermediate supporting layer on which they rest
16
• Anisotropic etch : preferential etching ofsingle crystal silicon along specific crystalplanes
• ODE (orientation dependent etch): same asanisotropic etch
• LIGA (LIthografie, Galvanik, Abformung):process by which high aspect ratio platingmolds are fabricated– German words for lithography, electroforming,
injection molding
17
Major IC and MEMS Fabrication Steps
FilmDeposition
Lithography
Etching
Dicing &Packaging Testing
Doping
Wafer
Masks
bulk etchingsurface micromachiningrelease processing }
alter conductivityetch stop{
18
• Available for shared, low-cost micromachiningprojects– MUMPS = Multi-User MEMS Process (Cronos)– MOSIS = Metal Oxide Silicon Implementation Service
(Information Sciences Institute-USC)– Sandia National Laboratories SUMMiT Process– Advanced Micro Devices
• Aerospace resources– Extensive diagnostic tools– Center for Microtechnology
» “Silicon Etcher” laser processing
Foundry Services
19
• Millimeterwave antenna array concept– Array to be combined with feed line structure as
part of an integrated “receiver on a chip” frontend concept
» Combine MEMS and MMIC technologies
Sample applications for satellite and mobile communication systems:
Device & Process Development
Integrated feed network
Antennas
LNALO
Mixer
RF IFBPFEmbedded Interconnects
Embedded Interconnects
BPF
BPF
20
• Begin development of constituent elements for integratedreceiver front end– Form antenna reflector surface in thick oxide or SOG (spin on glass)
film– Metallize surface– Form deployed, hinged beam for antenna feed and support
Aerospace Corporation Patent:MICROMACHINED REFLECTOR ANTENNA SYSTEM AND METHOD
U.S. 6,008,776 (December 28, 1999) & U.S. 6,045,712 (April 4, 2000)
21
• Eventual component forintegrated receiver front end– Electrostatically-driven,
micromachined switchmechanism combined with filter
– When actuated, one arm ofrotating switch contacts inputfeed for one of two nearby filterstructures
Aerospace Corporation Patent:MICROMACHINED ROTATING INTEGRATED SWITCH
U.S. 6,072,686 (June 6, 2000)
22
• Build capabilities for the design, fabrication andtesting of MEMS structures
» Explore bulk & surface silicon micromachining techniques» * Develop release processes not vulnerable to stiction» Characterize process for deposition of thick films» Establish repeatability of wafer bonding process
– Explore stress, strain and fatigue mechanisms of filmsand materials used in MEMS structures
Aerospace Corporation Patent :METHOD OF HF VAPOR RELEASE OF MICROSTRUCTURES*
Notice of Allowance January 23, 2001
PolysiliconOxideSubstrate
23
Sample Aerospace MEMS Structures
•Suspended polysilicon bridge test structure•~20 µm l x 2.5 µm w x 1500 A t•Confirms complete removal ofsacrificial oxide layer
•Released polysilicon cantilever beams•~40 µm l x 2 µm w x 1500 A t •No stiction•Anchors (supports) visible
24
Sample AerospaceMEMS Structures
•Irregularly shaped released beams•~1500 A thick•Simulates meandering transmissionlines and circuit interconnects
•Close-up view of released beams•Smooth sidewalls and completelyclean substrate below
25
Sample Aerospace MEMS Structures
Silicon Micromotor Lateral resonantmicroactuator
Vibrometer
26
Advantages of MEMS Si Processing• Material is abundant, inexpensive, now can be
produced and processed controllably tounparalleled standards of purity and perfection
• Silicon processing based on thin deposited films andshapes highly amenable to miniaturization
• Circuits are batch fabricated, making them viablefrom a practical and commercial point of view
• Feature sizes readily achievable with modestprocessing capabilities
• Expanded data gathering and sensing• Reduced weight and volume
27
Disadvantages of MEMS Si Processing• IC processing considerations restrict design
geometries in direction normal to wafer surface• Understanding film mechanical properties• Component reliability• Compatibility of surface and bulk micromachining
processes, which differ significantly• Translate achievements in Silicon to Gallium
Arsenide environment• No widely accepted space qualification plan• New paradigm; need to overcome perception as
risky technology
28
• Develop capability for metal deposition on vertical-walled structures(planetary evaporation)
• Enhance techniques for reliable deposition of films thicker than 1 mmand processing thick wafers
• Produce electrostatically-driven cantilever beams– switches, millimeterwave component structures
• Evaluate strengths and areas of application for LIGA (LIthografie,Galvanik, Abformung) process by which high aspect ratio platingmolds are fabricated
• Use MEMS to add capability to existing systems• Combine MEMS and MMIC technologies• Demonstrate components for receiver-on-a- chip• Characterize film properties: stress, strain & fatigue mechanisms• Develop novel MEMS for new space communications concepts
Aerospace Future Plans
29
Technology challenges• IC processing considerations restrict design
geometries in direction normal to wafersurface
• Issues of pattern definition and mechanicalproperties
• Compatibility of materials for processing• Surface and bulk micromachining processing
significantly differ• Wafer bonding and handling• Resistance to new technology and paradigm
30
Conclusions• For many electromechanical systems, miniaturization is
neither practical, nor desirable• Nonetheless, micromechanical structures for novel
millimeterwave components, sensing and actuation can oftenimprove the overall performance of the macroscopic system
• Be prepared to evaluate and support its integration intocustomer’s space systems at the appropriate time
• Need for compact, highly-capable, cost-effective subsystemsfor mobile and satellite communications can be met by thefusion of MEMS and microwave integrated circuittechnologies
• Novel millimeterwave concepts emerging include:– integrated receivers– micromachined antenna arrays and switches– embedded interconnects and waveguides
31
References, Resources&Acknowledgements
• Electronic Systems Division, Microelectronics Technology Department, Center forMicrotechnology, The Aerospace Corporation
• National Nanofabrication Facility, Cornell University• Berkeley Sensor and Actuation Center, UC-Berkeley• Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Cal Tech• Case Western Reserve University• Center for Integrated Sensors and Circuits, University of Michigan• Sandia National Laboratory• Microelectronics Center of North Carolina (MCNC)-Cronos• Air Force Research Lab• Rockwell Science Center• Stanford University• SMC/TE Space Test Program• Space Command Space Surveillance Network (SSN)