Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

12
1 TOWN OF WHITBY STAFF BRIEFING NOTE POTENTIAL ACTION REQUIRED Potential amendment to Town of Whitby’s Official Plan with regards to conformation with the Province of Ontario’s Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe Date: February 16, 2011 To: E. Belsey, Principle Planner, for distribution to Town of Whitby Council From: Derek Nawrot (500201951), Student Intern, Ryerson University Wards: All Reference Number: P:\2011\PlanningDepartment\February2011\Update SUMMARY: The Town of Whitby is waiting on a decision from the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) regarding case PL100386. The subject of the case are lands centred on Anderson St./Conlin Rd. which have been designated as Living Areas in the Region of Durham Official Plan Amendment (ROPA) #128, and further supported by the Town. The Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) rejected this designation stating that the original designation of the lands as Employment Areas is consistent with the Places to Grow Act/Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and should remain. The case regards an appeal by Highmark Homes (“Appellant”) against the MMAH to support the redesigation of affected lands. The result of the decision will determine if the lands remain as Living Areas or are reverted back to Employment Areas. If the lands are supported as Living Areas, it is recommended that Council support the amendment of Schedule P of the Taunton North Community Secondary Plan, Whitby Official Plan, to reflect this as well as support further land-use studies. If the lands revert back to Employment Areas, it is recommended that Council support further studies to determine the feasibility of continuing as Prestige Industrial/Agriculturezoned lands, or trying to incorporate

description

This is a potential amendment to Town of Whitby’s Official Plan with regards to conformation with the Province of Ontario’s Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. It was for a class exercise only and is no way related or endorsed by the Town of Whitby. Completed for Ryerson University PLG 830 - Planning and Administration Implementation.

Transcript of Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

Page 1: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

1

TOWN OF WHITBY

STAFF BRIEFING NOTE

POTENTIAL ACTION REQUIRED

Potential amendment to Town of Whitby’s Official Plan with

regards to conformation with the Province of Ontario’s Growth

Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe

Date: February 16, 2011

To: E. Belsey, Principle Planner, for distribution to Town of Whitby Council

From: Derek Nawrot (500201951), Student Intern, Ryerson University

Wards: All

Reference

Number:

P:\2011\PlanningDepartment\February2011\Update

SUMMARY:

The Town of Whitby is waiting on a decision from the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB)

regarding case PL100386. The subject of the case are lands centred on Anderson St./Conlin Rd.

which have been designated as Living Areas in the Region of Durham Official Plan Amendment

(ROPA) #128, and further supported by the Town. The Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs

and Housing (MMAH) rejected this designation stating that the original designation of the lands

as Employment Areas is consistent with the Places to Grow Act/Growth Plan for the Greater

Golden Horseshoe and should remain. The case regards an appeal by Highmark Homes

(“Appellant”) against the MMAH to support the redesigation of affected lands. The result of the

decision will determine if the lands remain as Living Areas or are reverted back to Employment

Areas. If the lands are supported as Living Areas, it is recommended that Council support the

amendment of Schedule P of the Taunton North Community Secondary Plan, Whitby Official

Plan, to reflect this as well as support further land-use studies. If the lands revert back to

Employment Areas, it is recommended that Council support further studies to determine the

feasibility of continuing as ‘Prestige Industrial/Agriculture’ zoned lands, or trying to incorporate

Page 2: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

2

mixed-uses. Regardless of the outcome, it is recommended that Council include the lands north

of Anderson St./Conlin Rd. as an addition to the Taunton North Community Secondary Plan,

Whitby Official Plan, incorporate terminology from the Places to Grow Act/Growth Plan for the

Greater Golden Horseshoe into the Official Plan, and work with Regional officials to amend any

changes to the Regional Official Plan.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

It is recommended that pending an outcome of Ontario Municipal Board (OMB)

case PL100386 favourable to the Town of Whitby, Council support:

a) Schedule P of the Taunton North Community Secondary Plan, Whitby Official Plan, be

amended so the lands in the four designated quadrants of Anderson St./Conlin Rd., which

are currently designated as ‘Prestige Industrial,’ are designated as ‘Residential’; and

b) Further studies be conducted on the Anderson St./Conlin Rd. lands in regards to the

Taunton North Community Secondary Plan, Whitby Official Plan, to support their

designation as ‘Residential’.

It is recommended that pending an outcome of OMB case PL100386 unfavourable

to the Town of Whitby, Council support:

a) Further studies to the Taunton North Community Secondary Plan, Whitby Official

Plan, to determine if Employment Areas lands should remain ‘Prestige Industrial,’ or

receive another designation under Employment Areas that may contain the possibility of

mixed-use including ‘Residential’.

Pending either outcome of OMB case PL100386, Council support:

a) To expand the scope area of the Taunton North Community Secondary Plan, Whitby

Official Plan, to include the lands north of Anderson St./Conlin Rd., which are currently

not part of the Plan and designated ‘Agricultural’ and a ‘Future Urban Development

Area';

Page 3: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

3

b) The Town of Whitby Planning Department to work with the Region of Durham in order

to ensure that any changes resulting from the OMB decision in the Official Plan conform to

the Region Plan; and

c) Further analysis be done on the Official Plan to incorporate terminology from the

Ontario Places to Grow Act/Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe so that it is

consistent with Town terminology.

Financial Impact:

It is expected that there will be financial implications to the Town regardless of the OMB

decision. These costs are unknown at this time.

DECISION HISTORY:

On September 13, 2006, Durham Region Council resolved to designate approximately

60 acres of land at the northwest corner of Anderson St. and Conlin Rd. (see

Attachment#2) as Living Areas in the Regional Official Plan Amendment (ROPA) #114.

Consistent with this decision the site was considered as part of the Living Areas

inventory in the ‘Growing Durham’ land needs study. Growing Durham consultants, in

assessing the Employment Areas lands that had originally been designated, concluded

that the remaining lands on opposite corners should be retained as a contiguous

Employment Areas block.

On November 10, 2008, a public meeting in Council was held to seek input from

property owners within the Anderson St./Conlin Rd. area. At this meeting, Council

moved to recommend that Town Planning Report 142-08, which suggested that Council

recommend to the Region that additional land centred on the Anderson St. corridor and

encompassing all four quadrants of the Anderson St./Conlin Rd. intersection be

redesignated from Employment Areas to Living Areas, and forwarded to the Region. This

suggestion was included in ROPA#128 as the Region supported Council’s decision in

favour of the redesignation.

Minutes available here:

Page 4: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

4

http://www2.whitby.ca/asset/cs-minutes_specialplanninganddevelopmentcommittee-

nov102008.pdf

On November 25, 2008, the Recommended Growth Scenario and Policy Directions

Report, prepared by Urban Strategies, was endorsed by Regional Planning Committee

and formed the basis for ROPA#128.

On June 3, 2009, ROPA#128 was submitted to the Province for approval.

On March 12, 2010, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) issued a

draft decision for ROPA#128. The draft proposed a number of modifications including

refusing to acknowledge the designation of the affected lands as Living Areas. Reasons

provided were: 1) The additional three corners proposed to be converted were not

recommended through the ‘Growing Durham’ study; 2) The lands form part of a

significant employment area; 3) The lands are strategically located adjacent to the future

Highway 407; and 4) The lands benefit from buffers such as the natural major open

space corridor to the south and west, the hydro corridor, future highway corridor and

employment lands to the north, and employment lands to the east.

Response available here:

http://www.durham.ca/growthplan/appeal_documents_ROPA128/STAFFREPORT_FIN

AL_Sep28_10.pdf

At the end of May, 2010, the Region provided area municipalities with an early release of

their Commissioner’s Report, which is a response to the Province’s draft decision on

ROPA#128. The report continued to support the Living Areas designation. On June 7,

2010, Council voted to support Town Planning Report 79-10 which reaffirms their

support for the Living Areas designation and the Commissioner’s Report.

Report available here:

http://www2.whitby.ca/asset/cs-report_PL79-10-jun072010.pdf

Minutes available here:

Page 5: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

5

http://www2.whitby.ca/asset/cs-minutes_specialcouncil-jun072010.pdf

On July 29, 2010, a pre-hearing at the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) begin for an

appeal by Highmark Homes (“Appellant”) against the failure of the Ministry of the

MMAH to make a decision regarding ROPA#128. The Appellant supports the

redesignation to Living Areas as it pertains to lands at the northwest quadrant in which it

has an interest. A second pre-hearing conference took place on September 10, 2010 with

the continuation on November 19, 2010. As of this date, approximately seventy appeals

have been filed against the MMAH decision regarding ROPA#128 which has delayed the

trial as the OMB waits for the appeals. A third pre-hearing date is scheduled for February

18, 2011.

OMB E-status case details available here:

http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/ecs/CaseDetail.aspx?n=PL100386

ISSUE BACKGROUND:

Growth Plan Conformity

a) Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe

On June 13, 2005, the Province passed The Places to Grow Act, 2005, which provides the

legal framework necessary for the Province to designate a geographic area as a growth plan area

and subsequently to develop a growth plan for that area. Ontario Regulation 416/05 was also

approved which identifies the geographic area of the Greater Golden Horseshoe growth plan

area. This growth plan area includes the Region of Durham as well as other upper-tier and

single-tier municipalities extending generally around the western end of Lake Ontario. The

Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure website www.placestogrow.ca provides an extensive

description of the Places to Grow – Growth Plan initiative.

The Growth Plan requires that area municipalities must conform to and implement their

Official Plans through the following:

Page 6: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

6

Allocation of population and employment growth forecasts to 2031, for upper-tier

municipalities (e.g. Durham Region), to be allocated to each lower-tier area

municipality (e.g. Town of Whitby);

How to effectively and efficiently manage growth;

General intensification to 2031 including:

o a 40% rate of residential intensification which is to occur within ‘built-up’

areas to be measured across the upper-tier, or Region; and

o key locations where intensification should occur (e.g. Centres, Major Transit

Station Areas, Intensification Areas, and Corridors)

Restrictive policies regarding Employment Lands;

Minimum densities for designated ‘greenfield’ areas (e.g. 50 persons and jobs per

hectare for development within new urban areas); and

Urban area boundary expansions.

b) Growing Durham/Durham Region Official Plan

The Region’s ‘Growing Durham’ exercise was undertaken to confirm with and

implement the Growth Plan, which culminated in the adoption of ROPA#128. The ‘Growing

Durham’ website www.durham.ca/growthplan includes an extensive overview and

documentation regarding the exercise and further documentation for ROPA#128.

Implications for Whitby from ROPA#128 include the following:

Population, household, and employment forecast allocations for Whitby as follows:

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Urban

Population 122,935 138,555 154,835 177,060 190,760

Rural 2,055 2,070 2,080 2,090 2,100

Page 7: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

7

Population

Total

Population 124,990 140,625 156,915 179,150 192,860

Households 41,705 47,750 55,240 64,570 71,650

Employment 40,650 47,795 56,745 64,975 71,310 Source: Town of Whitby

General and specific growth management and staging policies;

Specific intensification targets allocated to Whitby, being 11,963 new dwelling units

through intensification within the ‘Built Boundary’ between 2015 and 2031, which is

approximately 45% of new residential growth in Whitby;

Special intensification policies regarding minimum densities and floor space indexes for

areas of intensification (e.g. Regional Centres and Corridors, Local Centres and

Corridors, Waterfront Places, Commuter Stations);

Identification of the ‘Built Boundary’ as determined by the Province of Ontario, where

minimum intensification targets are to be met; and

Minimum densities for new ‘greenfield’ development

Land designation map for the affected area can be seen in Appendix C.

c) Town of Whitby Official Plan

The Whitby Official Plan was adopted by Council on September 28th, 1994 and

subsequently approved with modifications by the Region of Durham on December 6th, 1995,

with the exception of certain deferrals. The Town website

http://www.whitby.ca/index.php?page=257 provides information on the Official Plan, review

process, and four phase approach to amendments.

The most recent amendment to the Official Plan, OPA No.90,

(http://www2.whitby.ca/asset/cs-report_PL108-10-sep092010.pdf) was moved by Council on

September 9, 2010. Although no amendments had to do directly with the Anderson St./Conlin

Rd. lands, the following amendments have to deal with Growth Plan conformity:

Page 8: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

8

Adjusted urban area boundaries and identified designated Future Urban Development

Areas established by the Region of Durham through ROPA#128 to accommodate

forecasted growth to 2031;

Included the ‘Built Boundary’ established by the Province of Ontario;

Incorporated a new planning horizon, as well as population and employment forecasts to

2031; and

Identified areas that require the preparation of a Secondary Plan prior to any development

occurring.

Section 11.10 of the Official Plan is the Taunton North Community Secondary Plan,

which deals with the lands to south, but not north, of Conlin Rd. The focus area of the Secondary

Plan is shown in Schedule P (see Appendix D). Current designation of the lands south of

Anderson St./Conlin Rd. is ‘Prestige Industrial’. Section 4.6.3.3.2 of the Official Plan addresses

‘Prestige Industrial’ and allows generally light industrial uses with enclosed buildings,

professional, corporate and industrial oriented office buildings, data processing centres,

commercial or technical schools, research and development facilities, and incidental sales outlets

within industrial buildings. Land north of Anderson St./Conlin Rd. is designated as

‘Agricultural’ and a ‘Future Urban Development Area’.

COMMENTS:

Subject Area Description

Location: Four quadrants at Conlin Rd. / Anderson St. intersection

(generally bounded by: the Ontario Hydro Corridor to the

north; the Ontario Hydro Corridor to the east; the

environmentally sensitive lands to the south (south of

Conlin Rd.); and, the environmentally sensitive lands to the

west (west of Anderson St.).

Subject Area: Approximately 100 hectares (247 acres)

Current Whitby OP Designation: North of Conlin Rd.:

Schedule ‘A’ – Land Use: “Future Urban Development

(F.U.D.A.) 2”; “Major Open Space”; and “Hazard Land”

Page 9: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

9

South of Conlin Rd.:

Schedule ‘P’ – Taunton North Community Secondary Plan:

“Prestige Industrial”; “Environmental Protection /

Conservation Land”; and “Hazard Land”.

Current Durham Regional

Official Plan Designation: 2008 Regional Official Plan (as amended by

ROPA #128, portions under Appeal): Living Area

Surrounding Land Uses: North: Ontario Hydro Corridor

South: environmentally sensitive lands

West: environmentally sensitive lands

East: Ontario Hydro Corridor

CONCLUSION:

The objective of this briefing note is to inform Council of an instance, the Anderson

St./Conlin Rd. lands, where the Region Official Plan suggests that lands on Anderson St./Conlin

Rd. be designated as Living Areas, as opposed to their original designation as Employment

Areas. This land conversion was rejected by the MMAH while the Town of Whitby maintains

the Living Areas designation. The issue is currently before the OMB in the pre-hearing stages. At

this point, no further recommendation is necessary pending the outcome of the OMB hearing.

Should the OMB hearing result positively for the Town and the use is permitted to continue as

Living Areas, it is suggested that Council support the amending of the Taunton North

Community Secondary Plan to adjust the land designation south of Anderson St./Conlin Rd.

from ‘Prestige Industrial’ to ‘Residential’. As such, further studies on land servicing should be

including in the Plan. Schedule P, the Taunton North Community Secondary Plan map, should

be amended to designate these lands as ‘Residential’. Regardless of the decision, it is also

recommended that Council expand the scope area of the Taunton North Community Secondary

Plan to include the lands north of Anderson St./Conlin Rd., which are not currently part of the

Plan and designated ‘Agricultural’ and a ‘Future Urban Development Area’. Subsequently, in

any decision, the Town Planning Department should work with the Region in order to ensure that

any changes in the Official Plan conform to the Region Plan. Finally, it is recommended that

further analysis be done on the Official Plan to incorporate terminology from the Growth Plan

(such as Living Areas and Employment Areas) so that it is consistent with Town terminology.

Page 10: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

10

Should the OMB decision result negatively for the Town, it is recommended that Council

support further studies to determine if Employment Areas lands should remain ‘Prestige

Industrial,’ or, for example, be designated as ‘Commercial’ with the possibility of ‘Residential.’

CONTACT:

Derek Nawrot, Student Intern, Ryerson University

[email protected]

SIGNATURE:

_______________________________

Ed Belsey

Principle Planner

Town of Whitby

ATTACHMENTS:

Appendix A – References

Appendix B – Overview aerial photo of affected lands

Appendix C – Land use designation of the Durham Region Official Plan

Appendix D – Schedule P of the Taunton North Community Secondary Plan, Whitby

Official Plan

Page 11: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

11

Appendix A – References

Durham, Region of. (2011). Growing Durham including The Regional of Durham Official Plan.

Retrieved electronically from:

http://www.durham.ca/growthplan/

Ontario, Province of – Ministry of Infrastructure. (2011). Places to Grow incl. The Growth Plan for the

Greater Golden Horseshoe. Retrieved electronically from:

https://www.placestogrow.ca/index.php?lang=eng

Ontario, Province of – Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. (2010). Ministry staff report.

Retrieved electronically from:

http://www.durham.ca/growthplan/appeal_documents_ROPA128/STAFFREPORT_FINAL_Sep

28_10.pdf

Ontario, Province of – Ontario Municipal Board. (2010). E-status case details for Case PL100386.

Retrieved electronically from:

http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/ecs/CaseDetail.aspx?n=PL100386

Whitby, Town of. (2008). Minutes of a special meeting of the Planning and Development Committee held

on Monday, November 10, 2008. Retrieved electronically from:

http://www2.whitby.ca/asset/cs-minutes_specialplanninganddevelopmentcommittee-

nov102008.pdf

Whitby, Town of. (2010). Recommendation report prepared by the Planning Department for June 7,

2010. Retrieved electronically from:

http://www2.whitby.ca/asset/cs-report_PL79-10-jun072010.pdf

Whitby, Town of. (2010). Recommendation report prepared by the Planning Department for September

9, 2010. Retrieved electronically from:

http://www2.whitby.ca/asset/cs-report_PL108-10-sep092010.pdf

Whitby, Town of. (2010) Minutes of a special meeting of the Council held on Monday, June 7, 2010.

Retrieved from:

http://www2.whitby.ca/asset/cs-minutes_specialcouncil-jun072010.pdf

Whitby, Town of. (2011). Official Plan Review including the Town of Whitby Official Plan. Retrieved

electronically from:

http://www.whitby.ca/index.php?page=257

Page 12: Memo for Amendment to Growth Plan

12

Appendix B – Overview aerial photo of affected lands

Source: Bing Maps