McGillDAILY

THE

Volume 98, Issue 31 February 2, 2009

Cloistered since 1911

McGill: stuck in the bubble?

NEWS 3. EDITORIAL 23.

• Intensive 60-Hour Program

• Classroom Management Techniques

• Detailed Lesson Planning

• ESL Skills Development

• Comprehensive Teaching Materials

• Interactive Teaching Practicum

• Internationally Recognized Certificate

• Teacher Placement Service

• Money Back Guarantee Included

• Thousands of Satisfied Students

Teach EnglishOverseas

TESOL/TESL Teacher TrainingCertification Courses

OXFORD SEMINARS1-800-269-6719/416-924-3240

www.oxfordseminars.ca

YOUR ART

HERE

graphics@mcgilldaily.com

����������������������������������������������������������������������������

��������������������������������������������������������

�

��������������������

Info sessions will cover the following topics:

• The best time to look for an apartment.

• When, Where and How to look for an apartment.

• Apartment sizes, costs, resources.

• Québec Lease Laws.

• Application forms & leases.

• Renewing/non-renewing & breaking a lease.

• Refusing rent increase.

• Living with roommate (s).

• What to do if you have problems with your landlord.

����������������������������������

Special sessions in

March on subletting and transferring of a

lease

Every Friday @ 2 pm

Brought to you by McGill Off Campus Housing Office (www.mcgill.ca/offcampus)

Location!!!!!

Sessions will be held @ Diocesan

College Residence (Reading Room)

3473 University Street,

Montreal Qc, H3A 2A8

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009 3News

Biliterate is the new bilingualMcGill students’ French stagnates in all-anglo environment

McGill students seeking to integrate themselves into Quebec culture should

strive for biliteracy, not simply bilin-gualism, according to a recent report released by a Quebec community group that represents the anglo minority in Quebec.

The report, Creating Spaces, was commissioned by the Quebec Community Group Network, and called biliteracy “a powerful tool to tackle many multi-faceted bar-riers English-speakers face in par-ticipating fully in Quebec society.” It also declared full biliteracy for Quebec youth as one of its top goals. Bilingualism designates functionality in both languages without specify-ing the user’s full capacity in either, and biliteracy is best described as full spoken, reading, and written fluency in two languages.

According to Gregg Blachford, Director of McGill’s Career Planning Services while functional oral bilin-gualism is probably most common in the workforce, biliterates have a much broader range of opportunities available to them.

But biliteracy is not valued as highly in McGill society as func-tional or even minimal bilingualism: upon graduation, many students seek careers outside of the province, where standards for English-French

bilingualism are much lower. Blachford noted that McGill may

make an English life all too easy for students. Many, even those with backgrounds in French immersion programs, allow their French to stag-nate in McGill’s anglo environment. This isn’t always evident, as McGill is located in the centre of one of the world’s most culturally diverse cities; fluency in two languages might seem like a given.

“Within the McGill ghetto walls... [students’] confidence and ability in French drops, despite Montreal,” Blachford said.

Low confidence in French is a common excuse for settling into an English rut and one of the greatest barriers to biliteracy, according to McGill Psychology professor Fred Genesee, who specializes in bilingual education and psycholinguistics.

“It’s a two-way street,” Genesee said. “The more you use [French], the more confident you’ll become.”

Students who can improve their French confidence and become func-tionally bilingual are in good shape. In Genesee’s experience, English to French bilinguals often have little dif-ficulty segueing into biliteracy.

Blachford encouraged students to feel confident in their French, even if they perceive it as sub-par.

“Don’t giggle; don’t apologize; don’t signal bad confidence in your French,” Blachford said. “Know a few key phrases, some opening chit-chat, and don’t be self-conscious.”

Genesee noticed French students who come to McGill with little or no English background leave com-fortable and confident with the lan-guage, bolstering both Genesee’s and Blachford’s conclusion that immer-sion is key.

Genesee also urged anglophone students to take full advantage of the opportunities in Montreal for obtain-ing biliteracy.

“[Biliteracy] is where the rest of the world is moving,” Genesee said. “Montreal has a good start; we just need to take advantage of it.”

John LapsleyNews Writer

Thursday’s General Assembly (GA) is bound to be electrify-ing as a highly contentious

motion is brought forward to con-demn the bombings of educational institutions in the Gaza Strip.

Its critics, however, aren’t just riled up because it raises political questions about the Middle East; instead, they think the entire motion is unconstitutional, and are hold-ing SSMU Speaker Jordan Owens responsible.

Mushfia Ahmed, U1 Electrical Engineering, felt like this resolution alone may not have a substantive effect on Israel’s policy, but SSMU’s condemnation could be one of many messages of disapproval broadcast by the global community.

“If it passes now, it is almost use-less, especially after the end of mili-tary operations, but each condemna-tion adds up,” Ahmed said. “If no one speaks out, [Israel] may not recon-sider their actions next time. SSMU

is one more voice.... This [should not be] forgotten completely.”

Zachary Newburgh, U2 Honours Middle East Studies, criticized the resolution because the preamble states that Israel has deliberately targeted and razed hospitals, United Nations-funded compounds, and educational institutions, without any mention that the buildings may have been used by Hamas militants as bases of operations or as launching pads for weapons.

Newburgh, along with a large assortment of McGill students and campus organizations, including Hillel McGill, felt that taking such a political stance would not be produc-tive in an academic environment.

“There are students on campus that are considering pursuing legal action, [through the Judicial Board], in order to retract this resolution and ensure that McGill remains a safe place for all students,” Newburgh said. “SSMU, by allowing such a res-olution to come before the General Assembly, willfully isolates, margin-alizes, and makes students at McGill University feel unwelcome.”

Owens, however, disagreed. She pointed out that SSMU has historical-ly taken stances on external political issues in this manner.

“Through the General Assembly, SSMU took a stance on both the Vietnam War and the Iraq War. My reading of the constitution is that there should be free and open dialogue about policy and the General Assembly is the forum for that,” she said.

Newburgh also pointed to the unconstitutional nature of the motion. In an email to the Speaker, and CC-ed to SSMU President Kay Turner, The Daily, and other campus publica-tions, Newburgh explained several potential violations, such as Article 22, which states, “SSMU Council will not take a position on external politi-cal issues that Council deems to be extremely divisive among students at McGill University.”

He attributed the potential viola-tion to Owens’s negligence.

“The SSMU Speaker has unequiv-ocally chosen to violate the consti-tution and thereby infringe upon the rights of all those who fit under SSMU,” said Newburgh. “The job of

the SSMU Speaker is to make sure that all resolutions that are submit-ted to the General Assembly don’t violate the constitution.”

Corey Shefman, SSMU Speaker in 2006-2007, also held Owens respon-sible.

“The Speaker of Council has the authority to reject motions that are not in line with the SSMU Constitution,” he told The Daily in a telephone interview from Wales. “Even here in the UK, I’ve heard about the protests going on at McGill, and with that in mind, it is obviously a divisive issue.”

Shefman came under scrutiny at the February 2007 GA when he ruled two blood-drive motions were uncon-stitutional, thereby refusing to let the issue be discussed. The highly-divid-ed assembly tried to appeal the ruling, but eventually a slim majority voted to uphold the Speaker’s ruling.

Owens, however, defended herself, explaining that impartiality is a neces-sary virtue for a Speaker to possess.

“It’s not the role of the Speaker to decide whether or not a discus-sion should take place. SSMU has no

opinion on the matter right now, and that is for the General Assembly to decide,” she said.

VP Clubs & Services Samantha Cook also thought the motions do not violate the Constitution and that nei-ther the Speaker nor SSMU have done any harm to the school environment.

“I am familiar with Corey Shefman, but every speaker has a different way of looking at and interpreting the Constitution,” said Cook. “It is a liv-ing document, and its interpretation is a product of the times.”

Shefman, however, downplayed how representative the GA is in mat-ters of this divisive nature.

“Dividing the student body like this is not a good idea, especially not by 600 out of 20,000 students,” said Shefman.

“If this is a question that really needs to be asked, ask the whole stu-dent body in an online vote.”

Ethan FeldmanThe McGill Daily

Gaza motion sparks constitutional controversyCritics hold SSMU Speaker responsible

The GA will be held in the Shatner Cafeteria at 4 p.m. on Thursday. Maximum capacity for the cafeteria, with chairs and tables removed, is around 675 people.

Sal

ly L

in /

The

McG

ill D

aily

Five

Aliv

e m

id-y

ear S

SMU

revi

ews

News4 The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009

Leadership Skills Development Workshops

If you are a student involved in campus activities as an executive, organizer or event planner, you qualify for the Leadership Training

Program’s FREE Skills Development Workshops.Develop and build your leadership skills. Attend a minimum of five workshops throughout 08/09 academic year and receive a certificate of completion.

Upcoming Workshops:

Passing the Torch: Succession PlanningTuesday, February 3, 5:30-7:30pm

Make sure next year’s executives don’t have to start from square one! Plan, prepare and organize yourselves so that next year’s members will be able to learn from your experiences.

Conflict ResolutionMonday, February 9, 5:30-7:30pm

Conflict happens in all organizations but do you know how to handle it? Learn how to navigate difficult situations without making them worse – or ignoring them when they should be addressed.

Registration for workshops: In person, one week in advance, on a first-come, first-served basis, in the First-Year Office.

For more info, drop by the First-Year Office in the Brown Building, Suite 2100, or call 514-398-6913

LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM

CALL FOR NOMINATIONS

FACULTY OF ARTS TEACHING AWARDH. Noel Fieldhouse AwardFor Distinguished Teaching

Any student, alumni, or member of the academic staff may submit a nomination. Nomination forms are available on the web, in the Dean’s Secretariat (Arts Building, rm 110), or from departmental chairs.

For further information, please consult the web at

www.mcgill.ca/arts/awards2/fi eldhouse-awardor call 398-4216.

Send nominations to Susan Sharpe, Arts Bldg., rm 110

Deadline: Monday, February 16, 2009

Photos by Shu Jiang / The McGill Daily

NewsThe McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009 5

Want to learn more about living and working abroad. Come to one of our information sessions this winter. Each session will focus a little more on a specific destination, but there will also be an overview of our other SWAP destinations.

February 10 : Europe Destinations March 12 : Ireland April 22 : Australia May 12 : All Destinations

Time : 6 pm

Where : Voyages Campus - 3480 McTavish RSVP : mcgill@voyagescampus.com

WORK ABROADwith SWAP Working Holidays

www.swap.ca

Great Britain

Ireland

France

Germany

Austria

Australia

New Zealand

USA

Japan

China

Brazil

South Africa

Thailand

LIVE t WORK t PLAY ... AN ADVENTURE OF A LIFETIME!

SWAP is a not-for-profit program of the Canadian Federation of Students

Kay Turner knows she’s nearing the end. She’s looking to change and looking to do it fast. And so, realizing that some of her earlier goals are just too ambitious, Turner has shelved them for new, more realistic ones. Kay had once hoped to revamp Council, with big dreams for a more-informed committees, yet other projects interfered, like the nursery in Shatner for student parents and needing to pick up an extra portfolio. Former VP Finance Tobias Silverstein’s resignation in January

has clogged Turner’s schedule with money mat-ters, distracting her from focusing on presidential tasks. She has managed, though, to check a few to-dos off of her list. The lease for the new nurs-ery in Shatner is almost signed, with that for Café Supreme hopefully following shortly. With one sus-tainability report under her belt so far and another that includes a five-year plan chocked with small decisions SSMU can make for a better environment, Turner’s proud that SSMU is taking green steps.

Sometimes we can’t help but feel like Nadya Wilkinson is Captain Planet incarnate. Somehow, between battling administrative double-speak and untangling the bureaucracy, she successfully got the Office of Sustainability on its feet, and she’s improving relations between SSMU and the University. Wilkinson has built a strong student-staffed Senate caucus, which she’s used as a tool to lobby the University on its draconian travel directive - although not to the ends she wanted to see. If that’s not enough, Wilkinson now has the Financial Ethics and Responsibility Committee to

deal with – a VP Finance portfolio she says she’s going to have to rebuild. She’s also trying to track down a new ombudsperson, tackle the issue of room-bookings for student groups across campus, and launch a McGill Food Systems project that explores sustainable options on campus. The list is long, but based on Wilkinson’s enthusiasm and track-record, we’re optimistic that she’ll make a sizeable dent in her workload before her term is up. We only hope that she continues to engage with students in the process, and starts preparing a new student for her position to facilitate the transition.

Devin Alfaro is struggling, and he’s blaming the dying political spirit of McGill students. But an apathetic student population is not a valid excuse: it’s Alfaro’s job to make sure students stay aware and engaged in the community. Alfaro faltered in his attempt to repopularize Reclaim Your Campus and to improve low student voter turnouts during the Canadian and Quebec elections. We’ve had high expectations for Alfaro, especially because he seems to be one of the SSMUshies with the least going on in other areas; Alfaro didn’t absorb any portfolios with the disintegration of VP Finance.

Luckily, Alfaro may be able to turn his frustra-tion into a couple of new projects before his term wraps up. He’s talking about lobbying trips to Ottawa and Quebec City for increased government funding for education, starting workshops in the Milton-Parc community in conjunction with the Dean of Students Office, and fortifying a table de consultation with other Quebec schools. Alfaro’s got a point when he says that student disinter-est makes his job more difficult, but he’s going to need to stoke the fire of McGill’s undergraduates if he ever wants to been seen as a facilitator.

VP Clubs & Services Samantha Cook received a few curve balls this year. Yet the emergence of con-tentious pro-life group Choose Life and the surplus work she inherited from the VP Finance portfolio don’t seem to have ruffled her feathers too much. Cook has handled both incidents well, and she said she’s actually enjoyed taking over Gert’s from Silverstein. Before the end of her term, she’s plan-ning on investigating the future of food kiosks in the Shatner Cafeteria. Their leases expire two years from now, and she’d like to replace them with stu-dent initiatives. Cook has abandoned several of

her campaign promises, including fighting opt-outs and for the right of clubs to use the McGill name. She blames the administration and lack of appli-cability, respectively, for her neglect. With other pressing issues, Cook has only delivered moderate success. She’s made some headway in improving the issue of student space; the administration has granted students use of two more rooms in the Arts building. One of the greatest challenges to her portfolio, Cook said, has been working with stu-dents who are only engaged when riled by a nega-tive incident. We hope she can prove the contrary.

Julia Webster is partied out, and rightly so. The graduating VP Internal has produced a greener Frosh, a conservatively budgeted SnowAP, a re-introduction of 4Floors, which sold out, and a smattering of other faculty events. She’s got the Varsity Booth up and running for athletes to sell tickets for games, and has kept up events like Francofete, which celebrates French culture, and the self-explanatory Fill the Stadium. Yet she may not have saved SnowAP, and it’s likely that students will be staring at a big white field instead of a big white tent next January if it’s decided the event is too much of a financial

sinkhole. Webster has also struggled with the new SSMU web site launch, as the English ver-sion still lacks content and the French transla-tion is nonexistent. Haven Books, mini courses, and the SSMU sponsorship portfolio landed on Webster’s desk when Silverstein ditched, but Webster assured us that they’re all doing well. We beg to differ, though. Haven won’t break even this year, and there is not enough sponsorship funding available to run the year-end concert that Webster promised. With all these projects loom-ing over her head, Webster must also nail down a new beer contract for SSMU by years end.

Kay Turner President

Nadya Wilkinson VP University Affairs

Devin Alfaro VP External Affairs

Samantha Cook VP Clubs & Services

Julia Webster VP Internal

The Office for Students with Disabilities, the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, the Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism and

the Department of English are pleased to present :

Prof. Lennard J. DavisUniversity of Illinois at Chicago

Biocultures: Disability & Disciplinarity

Wednesday February 4, 2009 at 5pmLeacock Building, Room 232

855 Sherbrooke St. WestMcGill University

ASL interpretation will be provided & the venue is accessible.For more info : disabilities.students@mcgill.ca

This lecture is made possible by a grant from the Beatty Memorial Lectures Committee

flickr.com/photos/mcgilldaily.com

EXP SURE

The Daily wants to print your art. Submit to photos@mcgilldaily.com

Untitled Dominic Popowich

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009 7News

Calls to integrate Disability Studies into McGill’s curricu-lum will be heard this week

at the “Disability on Location” sym-posium, the first of its kind, running today through Wednesday.

The event – organized by a part-nership of SSMU, QPIRG, and the Office for Students with Disabilities (OSD) – will bring together aca-demia, cinema, and comedy in order to draw attention to an area of study which, according to the organizers, is largely overlooked in many university curriculums.

“[Academia] hasn’t really studied this...and it’s glaring in its absence,” said Roshaya Rodness, co-organizer of the event and a U3 Cultural Studies student. “These issues have been on the radar since the seventies, but the academy has been a little slow to pick them up.”

The event is co-organized by SSMU’s Equity Commissioner Iris Erdile, and held in conjunction with the student society’s Social Justice Days

Erdile emphasized that integrat-ing Disability Studies into McGill is crucial to sensitizing society to the daily realities faced by disabled peo-ple.

“It has to start with [academia],” Erdile said. “People come here to become leaders, so what better place to begin this process?”

The event will include a key-note address on Wednesday from Lennard J. Davis, a prominent Disability Studies professor from the University of Illinois. The sym-

posium will also feature lectures from a variety of McGill professors shown in conjunction with disabili-ty-themed films.

Tuesday night will feature the “sit-down” comedy of Ottawa native Alain Shane, who delivers his routine from his wheelchair.

According to organizer Rodness, Shane’s comedy brings a human face to disabled people.

“The great thing about having a disabled comedian is that they make you laugh at them, which is in many cases is a cultural taboo. It really makes you think about your own

assumptions about disabled people,” she said.

In the past, the administration has been largely skeptical of inte-grating Disability Studies courses at McGill, citing their inability to offer courses in all areas of academia. Rodness, however, compared this attitude to that toward Women’s Studies when it emerged in the 1970s – saying that eventually the University community will feel a responsibility to engage in the issue

of disability.The organizers were largely

critical of the administration’s cur-rent policy toward people with dis-abilities on campus, and called on McGill to improve transport for dis-abled students to the inaccessible classrooms on Peel street. However, they praised the work of the OSD in implementing accessibility programs at McGill.

According to Rodness, while sympathy for people with disabili-ties is admirable, programs like those offered by OSD must be expanded.

“When it comes down to imple-mentation, people’s feelings change, and they have to recognize that part of their willingness to rec-ognize people with disabilities is that process of implementation,” she said.

Events at the symposium will be wheelchair accessible and free of charge. American Sign Language translation for Davis’s keynote address and comedian Shane will be provided.

Symposium sensitizes studentsEvent urges McGill to incorporate Disabilities Studies

Two-hundred-and-fifty-three employees were locked out of the Journal de Montréal

last weekend after they rejected a new contract proposed by Quebecor Media, the conglomerate that owns the publication.

The workers are opposed to Quebecor’s failure to amend their contract to include an increase in the work week from 30 hours to 37.5 hours, adding a fifth day to the work week with no extra pay, as well as a 20 per cent reduction in benefits. Workers at the paper also want the management to reassign employees to multimedia work.

Their contract expired on December 31.

Quebecor has cut and altered its “business model.” These changes

were necessary, the company said, due to the vast expansion of cheap Internet alternatives for news.

“Quebec is not immune to the tur-moil in the paid-circulation newspa-per industry, caused by factors such as the advent of Internet news sites and other free news sources, chang-ing readership habits, the distribu-tion of content in digital formats, the availability of regularly updated real-time information, and falling revenues from advertising and classi-fieds,” represntatives from Quebecor stated in a press release.

But these changes could threaten the quality of the paper and of the reporting, said Raynald Leblanc, president of the Syndicat des travail-leurs de l’information du Journal de Montréal to the Montreal Gazette.

The popularity of web sites such as Craigslist and Kijiji have diverted much of the Classifieds content, a key source of revenue, away from

newspapers, while blogs and other free new sites have taken away read-ership.

On Sunday, January 25 – the day after the lockout at the Journal – the Montreal Gazette found itself in a similar plight. Their management submitted a new contract that divid-ed advertising against editorial and readers sales within the Montreal Newspaper Guild.

According to the Guild’s vice pres-ident, Irwin Block, the publisher of the Gazette said the jurisdiction was not good enough.

While the disputes within the Journal de Montréal and the Gazette continue to unfold, it is not clear that a solution will be reached anytime soon.

The last time a clash occurred between the Journal de Montréal’s management and the union in 2007, an agreement was not reached until 15 months after the lockout.

Samuel ReislerNews Writer

Journal de Montreal locked outEmployees reject contract proposal

Marc TrusslerNews Writer

Students will now be able to seek an exemption from McGill’s travel guidelines, which provide

University-wide standards on curric-ular or co-curricular travel to specific countries or regions.

The updated version of the guide-lines – which include an exemption clause outlining how a student may receive permission to visit prohibited country and clearer language describ-ing rules regarding employment in foreign nations during study abroad – were revealed to the McGill Senate on January 21, at which Senators were invited to give feedback, though not their approval, before a finalized ver-sion of the guidelines is released by the end of February.

Senate voted to suspend the directive on November 5, demand-ing that it pass consultation with Senate’s steering committee before being approved, but the adminsitra-tion claimed that the directive did not fall under Senate’s academic pur-view, and rendered the November vote void. However, a draft of travel guidelines was later sent to select members of the Senate for review over Winter Break.

According to Deputy Provost (Student Life & Learning) Morton J. Mendelson, whose office drafted the travel directive in September 2008 and all of its subsequent updates, the number of students requiring exemp-tions will likely be so low that McGill can grant exemptions on a case-by-case basis. He cited schools such as the University of Saskatchewan and Duke University as having similar policies.

“In other universities that have this kind of exemption, the number of requests per year is about a dozen,” Mendelson said.

The guidelines follow travel advi-sories issued by Canada’s Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) to determine where

students can travel, prohibiting travel to countries or regions with a level-three “avoid all non-essential travel” or level-four “avoid all travel” warning. The exemption will only apply for level-three travel in which a student considers travelling to be essential. According to a clause in the present draft, exemptions must first be approved by the relevant faculty’s dean and department chair before undergoing review by the Deputy Provost, who can set conditions on approval.

SSMU VP University Affairs Nadya Wilkinson asserted that the approval process required for travel exemp-tions contributes toward an unwieldy bureaucracy.

“I know that [the deans and Professor Mendelson] are busy peo-ple,” Wilkinson said. “And I know that undergraduate travel to dan-gerous places is not something they want to [look at too quickly]. There will be less [exemptions], as it’s clear to students that their applications aren’t processed with haste.”

As some travel cases include examples in which a student would be prevented from travelling to their home country because it’s listed by DFAIT, Mendelson indicated that the exemption system could take this into account.

“Students with certain kinds of experience would be in a better posi-tion to have exemption than other students in a specific area,” he said.

Wilkinson explained that while the guidelines have become more reasonable, their creation was unnec-essary.

“We do need guidelines that make sure students are informed and safe, but there has to be a much more local decision process that respects auton-omy,” Wilkinson said. “My main issue with this is that students also care about safety and have the capacity to make informed decisions.”

Mendelson predicted that the finalized guidelines will mostly resemble those sent recently to the Senate for discussion.

Jeff Bishku-AykulThe McGill Daily

Exemption added to travel directiveAdministration listens to Senate on guidelines

Sas

ha P

lotn

ikov

a /

The

McG

ill D

aily

“The great thing about having a disabled comedian is they make you laugh at them, which in many cases is a cultural taboo.”Roshaya Rodness Co-organizer of “Disability on Location”

1.0 Call to order 2.0 Adoption of the Agenda3.0 Announcements4.0 Report of the Executive Committee5.0 Old Business 5.1 Motion Re: Student Services5.2 Motion Re: Catered House Party5.3 Motion Re: SSMU Support for the Association of McGill Undergraduate Student Employees (AMUSE)5.4 Motion Re: Military Recruitment5.5 Motion Re: Administrators Identifi ed as Star Wars Characters5.6 Motion Re: Military Research5.7 Motion re: No Pants Fridays 6.0 New Business 6.1 Motion Re: Bottle Water Use On Campus 6.2 Motion Re: SSMU condemnation of bombings of education institu-tions in Gaza 6.3 Motion Re: GA Reform 7.0 Adjournment

1.0 Ouverture de l’assemblée2.0 Adoption de l’ordre du jour3.0 Annonces4.0 Rapport du comité exécutif5.0 Affaires Passées 5.1 Motion Concernant: Services alimentaires5.2 Motion Concernant: Fête chez la principale, repas compris5.3 Motion Concernant: Soutien à l’Association des Étudiants employés à McGill 5.4 Motion Concernant: Recrutement militaire à l’Université McGill 5.5 Motion Concernant: La désignation des administrateurs d’après les personnages de Star Wars5.6 Motion Concernant: La recherche militaire à McGill5.7 Motion Concernant: Les vendredis sans pantalon6.0 Nouvel ordre 6.1 Motion Concernant: l’usage d’eau en bouteille sur le campus 6.2 Motion Concernant: l’AÉUM condamne le bombardement des étab-lissements d’enseignement de Gaza 6.3 Motion Concernant: la réforme des AG7.0 Ajournement

Motions de l’assemblée générale régulièreHiver 2009 Motion Concernant : Services alimentaires*Motion Concernant : Fête chez la principale, repas compris*Motion Concernant : Soutien à l’Association des Étudiants employés à McGill*Motion Concernant : La désignation des administrateurs d’après les person-nages de Star Wars*Motion Concernant : Recrutement militaire à l’Université McGill*Motion Concernant : La recherche militaire à McGill*Motion Concernant : Les vendredis sans pantalon** ces motions sont disponibles à : www.ssmu.mcgill.ca/GA

Motion Concernant : L’Usage d’eau en Bouteille sur le CampusIl est résolu que l’AÉUM fasse des progrès vers l’élimination de la distribu-tion et de la vente de l’eau en bouteille dans le bâtiment de l’Association Étudiante ; Il est aussi résolu que l’AÉUM fasse pression sur l’administration de McGill pour faire de même et éliminer la vente et la distribution de l’eau en bouteille sur le campus ; Il est également résolu que l’AÉUM distribue des informations à tous les clubs et services ainsi qu’à l’ensemble des étudi-ants concernant les problèmes liés à l’eau en bouteille et il est enfi n résolu que l’AÉUM encourage la consommation d’eau du robinet et l’utilisation de moyens de distribution d’eau écologique, telles que les fontaines à eau et les verres réutilisables, etc.

Motion Concernant : l’AÉUM condamne le bombardement des établisse-ments d’enseignement de GazaIl est résolu que l’Association Étudiante de l’Université McGill condamne le bombardement des établissements d’enseignement de Gaza, dont l’université islamique de la ville de Gaza et les écoles gérées par UNRWA ; Il est aussi résolu que l’Association Étudiante de l’Université McGill émette immédi-atement une déclaration publique de condamnation et appelle le gouverne-ment canadien et la rectrice de l’Université McGill Heather Munroe-Blum à condamner le bombardement ; I l est aussi résolu que l’Association Étudiante de l’Université McGill entreprenne des initiatives publiques pour condamner le bombardement et soutenir le droit à l’éducation des élèves et étudiants palestiniens, avec des initiatives telles que: des conférences, des forums et/ou des collectes de fonds pour soutenir les étudiants de Gaza.

Motion Concernant : La Réforme des AGIl est résolu que cet organisme recommande la présentation par le conseil lé-gislatif de l’AÉUM d’une question de référendum visant à réécrire la section de la constitution concernant les AG afi n que celles-ci soient convoquées de façon ad hoc plutôt que deux fois par an.

Motions of the Regular General AssemblyWinter 2009 Motion Re: Student Services*Motion Re: Catered House Party*Motion Re: SSMU Support for the Association of McGill Undergraduate Students Employees (AMUSE)*Motion Re: Military Recruitment at McGill University*Motion Re: Administrators to be identifi ed as Star Wars characters* Motion Re: Military Research at McGill*Motion Re: No Pants Fridays**to read motions in full, please visit: www.ssmu.mcgill.ca/GA

Motion Re: Bottled Water Use on campus Be it further resolved that SSMU lobby McGill administration to follow suit and eliminate the sale and distribution of bottled water on the McGill cam-pus; and Be it yet further resolved that SSMU distribute information to all clubs and services, and to the student body on issues pertaining to bottled water; and Be it yet further resolved that SSMU promote the sustainable al-ternative of already readily available tap water, and other sustainable methods of water distribution such as water coolers, re-usable glasses, etc.

Motion Re: SSMU condemnation of bombings of education institutions in GazaBe it resolved that the Students’ Society of McGill University condemn the bombing of the educational institutions in Gaza, including the Islamic Uni-versity in Gaza city and the UNRWA run schools; and Be it further resolved that the Students’ Society of McGill University issues a public statement of condemnation immediately and call on the government of Canada and McGill University’s Principal Heather Munroe-Blum to also condemn the bombings; and Be it further resolved that the Students’ Society of McGill University, undertake public initiative to condemn the bombing and support the right to education of Palestinian students, and that such initiatives may include: campaigns, educational lecture series, forums and/or fundraising initiatives to support students in Gaza.

Motion Re: GA ReformBe it resolved that this body recommends that the SSMU legislative council put forward a referenda question to re-write the GA section of the constitution to make SSMU general assemblies an ad hoc rather than a bi-annual body.

ORDRE DU JOUR DE L’ASSEMBLÉE GÉNÉRALE

ASSOCIATION ÉTUDIANTE DE L’UNIVERSITÉ MCGILL

le 5 Février à 16h00 – à la cafétéria du ShatnerLes étudiants doivent apporter leur identifi cation McGill.

AGENDA FOR THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

STUDENTS’ SOCIETY OF

MCGILL UNIVERSITY

February 5th, 4:00 pm – Shatner CafeteriaStudents must bring their McGill IDs.

*Quorum for a regular or special general assembly is 100 members of the association from at least four different faculties or schools. Qualifi ed Quorum for this general assembly shall be

397 students, or 2% of the undergraduate population of McGill.

Questions or comments regarding this agenda may be directed to:pres@ssmu.mcgill.ca • 514-398-6801 • www.ssmu.mcgill.ca/GA

* Le quorum pour une assemblée générale régulière ou spéciale est de 100 membres de l’Association provenant d’au moins quatre facultés ou écoles différentes. Le quorum qualifi é pour cette assemblée générale est de 397 étudiants, soit 2% de la masse étudiante au 1er cycle

de l’Université McGill. Pour toute question concernant cet ordre du jour, contactez les présentateurs de l’AÉUM :

pres@ssmu.mcgill.ca • 514-398-6801 • www.ssmu.mcgill.ca/GA

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009 9News

Female to FemmeMonday, February 3, 7:30 p.m.Shatner, room B29 , 3480 McTavish

Divergence Movie Nights in collaboration with Queer McGill Presents: A film explor-ing femme dyke identities as radical gender practices. The film denaturalizes gender and pushes for an understand-ing of femininity as multiple rather than singular, con-structed rather than natural.FtF features a host of fabulous femmes, including professors, activists, artists, and dancers. The suggested donation is $5.

Water privatization Tuesday, February 3, 8 p.m. Arts W-215, 853 Sherbrooke O.

Cinema Politica presents Blue Gold: World Water Wars, a documentary about water privatization that explores a dozen countries to make explicit the connection between water and power.

Disabilities Studies at McGillWednesday, February 4,5 p.m. - 7 p.m. Leacock Building room 232, 855 Sherbrooke O.

Listen to Professor Lennard J. Davis on Disability Studies in universities, and what it means that McGill has no such program. The lecture is called Biocultures: Disability and Disciplinarity, and is presented by the Office for Students with Disabilities, the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, the Centre for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism, and the Department of English.

Create New Policies for Canada on Art, Media, and Culture Wednesday, February 4, 5:30 p.mEV 1.631 1515 Ste. Catherine O.

Contribute to NDP Concordia’s proposal on subsi-dies for artists, censorship, fair copyright law, and net neutral-ity, which will be presented at the upcomming federal party convention in Halifax.

World-wide sustainabilityThursday, February 5, 6 p.m. New Residence Hall, 3625 Parc.

Best-selling author Chris Turner will speak at McGill about his year-long travels around in search of green solu-tions. He wants to move away from the doom and gloom of maintstream environmental discourse, and focus instead on solving the world’s most urgent environmental challenges.

Party at Thomson for a causeSaturday, February 7, 10 p.m. - 3 a.m.Thomson House, 3650 McTavish.

Queer McGill’s theme for this year’s installment of its annual Thomson House Party is “Sex-Ed - Let’s Talk About Sex.” Proceeds go to Head & Hands – a non-profit organiza-tion aimed at helping bring sex-ual education to all students. The suggested donation is $5.

Send your not-for-profit events to news@mcgilldaily.com with haps as the subject.

Wh

at’s th

e ha

ps

In the aftermath of President Barack Obama’s decision to close Guantanamo Bay on January

20, experts and supporters are urg-ing Canada to repatriate a Canadian child soldier who has spent six tor-tured years in the off-shore prison.

The U.S. army captured Omar Khadr when he was 15, accusing him of throwing the grenade that killed Sergeant Christopher Spheer in Afghanistan during a fire fight in July 2002. He has been charged with war crimes in military tribunals.

In Guantanamo, he was subject-ed to extreme temperatures, forced nudity, and sexual humiliation. Guards even attached him to short-range chains for hours until he uri-nated on himself. They then poured pine-scented cleaning fluid over him and used him as a mop.

Amnesty McGill directors Margoth Rico and Silvana Lovera protested with a handful of sympathizers at the Roddick Gates last Tuesday as part of their campaign to demand Khadr’s repatriation.

While access to a fair trial is a step in the right direction, Rico believed that justice can only be achieved once Khadr is allowed to return to Canada.

“We should not be asking our-selves ‘Why should Omar Khadr be repatriated?’ but ‘Why has he not been repatriated?’” Rico said. “By not taking responsibility of Omar Khadr,

Canada is overlooking the rights that every Canadian citizen should be entitled to.”

Hours after accepting the presi-dency, Obama issued an executive order suspending all military trials, including Khadr’s, which was sched-uled for January 26. Judith Rae, a University of Toronto law student and founding member of The Omar Khadr Project, an organization of Canadian law students and young lawyers advocating for Khadr’s repa-

triation, criticized the Harper gov-ernment for shirking responsibility for Canada’s last remaining detainee.

“Stephen Harper’s continued silence is inexcusable. It has always been important to assist a Canadian citizen who is locked away facing an unfair trial abroad,” said Rae. “We know President Obama intends to end these illegal proceedings, which are contrary to the normal rules of human rights,” he said.

“The game is over. We would be happy to see Khadr face trial in Canada; there is no reason why he cannot be tried here.”

Lieutenant Commander Keubler,

Khadr’s Pentagon-appointed attor-ney to the case, explained Khadr’s military trial has run out of steam.

“I think Omar’s military prosecu-tion is effectively dead and that there are significant obstacles to any future prosecution of Omar Khadr by U.S. authorities,” said Keubler. “The ball is now squarely in the Prime Minister’s court to help President Obama clean up the Guantanamo mess by offering to take Omar back to Canada.”

Rae questioned the validity of the

evidence held against Khadr. “The U.S. altered documents

dating from around the time of the incident which made reference to another person alive who could have thrown the grenade,” said Rae. “Furthermore, some of the evidence used against him is unreliable, includ-ing alleged admissions that date from the time he was subjected to serious mistreatment, quite possibly includ-ing torture.”

Canada is legally bound by the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict to rehabilitate minors like

Omar Khadr and to reintegrate them into society.

Canada has widely supported rehabilitation programs for child soldiers from countries such Sierra Leone, Colombia, and Sri Lanka. Ishmael Beah, UNICEF Ambassador and former child soldier captured at age 15, called Canada’s treatment of Khadr a double standard.

“If a 15-year-old kid in Sierra Leone, in Congo, in Uganda, in Liberia, if they kill somebody and shoot some-body in the war, it’s fine, but as soon as that kid kills an American soldier...they are no longer a child soldier, they are a terrorist.”

It will be many months before Guantanamo is shut down and the files of the detainees facing military trial are reviewed. Having spent six and a half years in pre-trial detain-ment, many believe Khadr’s ordeal has already continued for far too long. With Obama and Harper due to meet in the coming weeks, the issue of Khadr’s return to Canada is more pressing than ever. Dennis Edney, Khadr’s Canadian attorney was dis-appointed with the public’s indiffer-ence to Khadr’s plight.

“Here we have a young boy who is blind in one eye, his other eye damaged, and we can’t even get him protective glasses. What are we doing for him as Canadians? What has McGill done?” Edney asked. “When we talk about Omar Khadr, we are talking about Guantanamo and the lack of rule of law in that hellish place. Where are the voices of outrage?”

Canadian child soldier still in limboOmar Khadr remains in prison, despite Obama’s recent decision to close Guantanamo

Despite decades-old cultural barriers, English and French youth aspire to bridge the

gap between “the two solitudes,” according to Creating Spaces, an innovative new report from the Quebec Community Groups Network (QCGN).

“We’re past the language thing,” said Brent Platt, co-chairman of QCGN’s Youth Standing Committee. “Youth are feeling positive about the

language separation, and they don’t fear assimilation.”

The Youth Standing Committee spearheaded the 32-page report that lays out a framework for integrating young anglophones and francophones in Quebec. The report opens by cit-ing a 2006 Statistics Canada report that found that over the previous 15 years, the number of 20-34-year-old English-speakers in Quebec dropped by one-fifth, and develops a series of aspirations and solutions designed to remedy the isolation many English-speaking youth feel in Quebec.

Platt stressed that although the

report contains enough statistics and empirical data to resonate with Quebec’s policymakers, this was a youth-managed project run by the same people whose identification with Quebec culture it seeks to remedy. Consequently, Platt has noticed strong positive reactions to Creating Spaces from readers of all ages.

The project aims to improve Quebec’s youth community from the inside out: slow the drain of Quebec’s anglophones by integrat-ing the English-speaking and fran-cophone communities. Creating Spaces also seeks to build a strong,

diverse youth network that will in turn attract further culturally diverse youth to Quebec through education, employment, and community life.

The project, however, does not end with the report. Platt called it a “gateway document” – a blueprint for future endeavours to unify the English and French youth communities.

Even so, Platt and the QCGN recog-nize that there is no quick fix to issues of cultural isolation in Quebec.

“This is something we’ll need to take one baby step at a time,” Platt said. “But we’re very, very optimis-tic.”

John LapsleyThe McGill Daily

“We are talking about the lack of rule of law in that

hellish place. Where are the voices of outrage?”

Dennis Edney, Omar Khadr’s Canadian attorney

The Daily is attempting to bring you coverage of bureaucratic McGill events in a more digestible form, so we decided to liveblog the SSMU Council meeting Thursday, a McGill first. Excerpts edited for length fol-low; for the entire account with links and to join the conversation on the comment board, visit mcgill-daily.com/blog/1010/entry/17585.

6:40: I think [McGill Executive Director of Student Services Jana] Luker just said SSMU Council is “the most powerful organization at

McGill.” I was right; she hasn’t ever been to a Council meeting.

7:02: It’s -6 degrees Celsius; you would think that there would be a more energy-efficient way to cool a room that’s surrounded on two sides by wall-to-ceiling windows than by blasting AC three inches from those windows!

7:17: VP Internal Julia Webster is speeding through her report. About the new beer contract, the Financial Ethics Review Committee will review

the beer suppliers, the proposals will go out early March, the negotiations will start mid-to-late March, and the signing will happen in May. The cor-ner where I sit applauds what will likely be the fastest SSMU tender, negotiation, and signing process for a contract in its history, bucking the trend of the last few contracts that have taken six to twelve months and are still not finished.

8:36: According to President Turner, people want to change the by-laws that refer to the Green Fee so they

reflect “what the framers intended.” Wow, modesty. This fee is not old enough to have “framers.” Sorry.

8:40: No by-law changes tonight (again!), because Council is one to three seats short of (two-thirds required) quorum. You know, it’d probably be easier to get 15 per cent of students to vote in the referen-dum/election period in March than get two-thirds of Council to show up to meetings they’re required to attend. Email your crazy ideas to speaker@ssmu.mcgill.ca.

Humera JabirNews Writer

Liveblogging SSMU Council

Group kicks off franco-anglo integration project

• advise on recruitment, new employee orientation, employee relations, performance management, workforce analysis and planning.

• work with a team of professionals in guiding implementation of human resources strategy

• advise management and staff on all aspects of human resources management

• ensure the maintenance and on-going development of the organization’s HR information system.

*Just one of the many career opportunities open to MSc in Administration graduates.

No matter what your undergraduate background, combine your knowledge with one of our specializations.

Learn more at one of our upcoming informations sessions:

Wednesday, February 4, 2009 12:00 p.m. GM 407-1Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:30 p.m. GM 409-1Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:30 p.m. GM 725

For more information: johnmolson.concordia.ca/msc514-848-2424 ext. 4149

Consider the MSc in Administration

Interested in a career as Strategic Advisor - Human Resources? *

Movers / Storage

ANBER MOVERSMoving / Storage. Closed van or trucks. Local + Long distance. OTT-TOR-NY-BOSTON-FLA. Low Rates

Steve • (514) 735-8148

ClassifiedsTo place an ad,via email: ads@dailypublications.orgphone : 514-398-6790fax : 514-398-8318

Cost :McGill Students & Staff : $6,70/day; $6.20/day for 3 or more days. General public : $8.10/day; $6.95/day for 3 or more days. 150 character limit. There will be a $6.00 charge per contract for any characters over the limit. Prices include taxes. MINIMUM ORDER $40.50/ 5 ads. Categories :Housing, Movers/Storage, Employment, Word Processing/Typing, Services Offered, For Sale, To Give Away, Wanted to Buy, Rides/Tickets, Lost & Found, Personal, Lessons/Courses, Notices, Volun-teers, Musicians, etc. Lost & Found ads are free.

HousingAPARTMENTS FOR RENT

BROOklyN-BEllE ÉPOQUEMcGill ghetto

RENOVATED apartment to rent, fridge & oven.(514) 499-3455www.cogir.net

Have you had a “LAZY EYE” since childhood? McGill Vision Research is looking for study participants. Please call Dr. Davar Nikneshan at 514-934-1934 ext. 35307 or email mcgillvisionresearch@gmail.com for

further information.

MASTER SchOOl OF BARTENdiNgBartending and table service courses

Student rebateJob reference service

• 514-849-2828www.Bartend.ca

(on line registration possible)

Employment

SUMMER CAMP : Swim Director, Activity Heads & instructors for : Waterski, Tennis, Rock Wall-Climbing, X-treme In-line Skatepark, Windsurf, Sail, Canoe, Kayak, Football, Basketball, Aerobics, Archery, Arts & Crafts, Pottery, Beads/jewellery, Nursing students (3rd + 4th yr.) to assist camp dr., 1 hr. north of Montreal

camp@mishmar.com

gET yOUR clASSiFiEdS ON ThE wEB!

Place your classifieds in The McGill Daily and for only 10$ more, we’ll add it to our website for the entire duration of the contract. Visit our classifieds section at

www.mcgilldaily.com/classifieds

ADVERTISE IN THE MCGILL DAILY!11,000 readers every Monday and Thursday

Each issue on stands all weekads@dailypublications

514-398-6790

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009Science+Technology 11

An article from the January 12 issue of ScienceNow, called “Are You a Moneymaker? Look

at Your Hands,” discusses research that looked to draw a relationship between a financial trader’s success and his or her index-to-ring-finger ratio. Whether the researchers’ motives arose from purely scientific curiosity or out of economic incen-tive is beside the point. They found that the traders with the lowest ratios – meaning a longer ring finger in rela-tion to the index – were the ones who made the most money in a given time period.

Now, there was scientific ratio-nale behind the hypothesis: other research has shown that a longer ring finger is a sign of higher exposure to testosterone in the womb, which in turn creates sensitivity to the hor-mone later in life, which then makes those people more apt to react to things quickly and to take more risks. Got that? Lots of testosterone means you become sensitive to it, this makes you get all risky and dangerous, and to top it off, you get an extra-large ring finger.

So, yes, this chain may sound a little unbelievable, and the interest-ing thing here is that the article dem-onstrates how much we love finding anatomical patterns that explain

other aspects of ourselves. Breaking away from scientific research, there are tons of myths out there that people believe to varying degrees; whether it’s the famous comparison of a male’s forefinger length to the size of his package or the idea that a man’s height is related to how high he climbs on the business ladder, we absolutely love thinking we can read a certain characteristic as a clue for another. Do our bodies really reveal that kind of information, or is this a human fabrication of fascination?

Our preoccupation is definitely not a new one. A popular 19th century discipline was phrenology, the study of a person’s skull and facial features to determine their personality traits. And people took it really seriously – basing decisions like who to marry on the length of a nose, or how a per-son’s upper lip curved.

Of course, the problem with look-ing for these types of patterns and relationships in a statistical way is that it can get out of hand very eas-ily. Eugenics comes along, and all of a sudden this pseudoscience is a tool to promote stereotypes and racism. Nazism is one historical example, but the trend stretches back to the early 20th century. Early eugenicists twisted Darwin’s ideas of evolution into an idea of racial superiority,

establishing a spectrum of evolution that placed Europeans as the most “highly evolved” people and Africans as more “primitive.” In one famous case, a Congolese man named Ota Benga was brought to the United States in 1904 and exhibited in the World’s Fair and the Bronx Zoo, labelled as a link between primates and humans. He was even caged up with an orangutan so visitors could note similarities in stature and smile. Disturbingly, these “human zoos,” as they were called, were very com-mon.

Is there a more productive, less harmful way to relate anatomical pat-terns to other human characteris-tics? What if we could observe a person’s favourite colour by the fissures on their skull, or find out some-thing about their study habits by how far apart their eyes are? Would we be able to notice these things without categoriz-ing people or even ostra-cizing them? Even if these types of relationships existed and we could study them effectively, it would still be a shortcut to getting to know someone, and a pretty lim-ited, black and white assessment at that. Most of us hope for a bit more complexity in our personalities.

So you can check your hand right now to see if you should be a top financial trader or if you’ll just have to settle for being very well-endowed, but chances are you probably believe it doesn’t really work that way.

Diane’s column will appear every other Friday. To give her the finger, email lostintranscription@mcgill-daily.com

Giving pseudoscience the finger

You may have noticed a new label on the bottle next to that cheap sludge you usually

buy at the SAQ. As students begin to pay the extra few pennies for that jar of organic tomato sauce, organic beverages are gaining their right-ful position in the market. Organic wineries are sprouting up all across Canada. According to the Pacific Agricultural Certification Society most of them are situated in British Columbia, although, a few are pop-ping up in Niagara, Ontario and in the Eastern Townships of Quebec.

But what is organic wine, and why should consumers fork over extra cash for a certification sticker? The processes of making organic wine and regular wine are similar, but some minor differences are key. In regular winemaking, the first step is to collect the grapes and cut them up into smaller pieces. Then, all the chopped up grapes are placed into a fermenter where a syrup will even-tually form. The mixture is covered and left to ferment for 24-hours, after which chemicals are added to steril-ize the mixture. Once wine yeast is added, the new mixture must fer-ment for about a week. The next step includes removing the pulp from the mixture and siphoning it

into another fermenter. An air lock is attached and filled halfway with water, then the wine is left to fer-ment for four to six weeks. Finally, once the wine mixture is completely clear, the sediment is siphoned out and the wine is bottled.

The difference between regu-lar wine-making and organic wine-making boils down to two practices – those of the vineyard, and those of the winery. Much like any other farming product, grapes from a vineyard are considered organic if they are grown without the use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, fun-gicides, and herbicides. As far as winery practice is concerned, the details for certification are slightly

more contested. According to John Henning, an

Associate Professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics at McGill, organic certification places limits on the amount of sulphates that can be used to help the fermentation pro-cess of the grapes.

“Some organic winemakers don’t use [sulphates] at all, so the level of sulphite will be much lower, but there will always be some [sulphates] due to the fermentation process,” he said.

According to Henning, the pur-pose of lowering the amount of sul-phates is that the sulphites produced through fermentation may present health concerns for consumers. “It

doesn’t present a huge health risk, but some people can have serious reactions [to it],” he said.

Aside from the advantages organic wines present for one’s health, connoisseurs argue that the organic wine-making process allows for a purer taste of the grape. For those who enjoy very fruity wines this may be desirable, as the fruit flavour would be more prominent in an organic wine. As far as I’m concerned, the advantages seem to outweigh the cost tremendous-ly. Although it may be tempting to reach for the cheap bottle that will dye your teeth red, consider spend-ing the few extra dollars on organic wine.

Alissa StachrowskiSci+Tech Writer

Fermenting on organic purchasesBreaking down the wine-making process and its organic alternative

UNDER THE SCOPE

Sally Lin / The McGill Daily

Diane Salema

Lost In Transcription

Features12

“A nd then I couldn’t stop laughing.”Reg loves the Habs more than

he loves his wife and she loves lis-tening to him grunt and shout at the players more than she loves his kiss.

Years of smoking du Maurier lights have scratched out his voice. I sometimes imagine a little man in his throat opening and folding up a beer can like an accordion when he speaks to me. When I met his five-year-old daughter, substantial and saucy, I wondered what Reg’s voice sounded like reading from books about the three little pigs or the seven dwarfs.

Reg is bilingual in the way only Montreal can make you. His relaxed French is flawless and weaves in and out of joual, but franco-phones can always detect that he speaks both. He never stumbles in English, but sometimes reaches for French words: vers, franchement, insupportable.

I knew only one other man like Reg. My grade-three French teacher, Monsieur

Thibault, had taken a hockey puck to his throat guarding nets for a semi-professional league for over-forties. The blow crushed his vocal chords, filling his French and English with wind.

Passing Reg at the doorway to the store-room, I realize that I still remember how Monsieur Thibault smelled. His smell was a mystery to me. And all my little heart wanted was to get to the bottom of it. I was sure he

smoked. At nine, I didn’t even know what cigarette smoke smelled like. But then, I also didn’t know what a man smelled like.

I selected a sidekick, Tatiana Poplovski, and brought a spiral notebook to school with the sharpied title, “Monsieur Thibault: Smoking Case.” That morning, Tatiana and I became detectives. We observed and meticulously noted the yellowness of his teeth, the condi-tion of his nails, the frequency of his breaks. We gave up because our data was inconclusive, but I still couldn’t get his smell out of my nose.

When Monsieur Thibault found the book, he called me to his desk. I had never been so close to his smell. I didn’t rat Tatiana out – that smell was all mine. He asked me why I had spied on him, without ever denying the allegations the book implied, and I couldn’t even answer I was so nervous. I thought about asking him how he smelled that way if he didn’t smoke.

Reg is dusting the bottles behind the bar and I’m standing, ass tight in Gap black pants, tits belted into a fuchsia bra. I didn’t eat before coming here – squeezing through the itty bitty spaces between chairs is embarrassing enough without my bloated belly skimming across a diner’s upper back.

I hate this restaurant, and I hate this job, everyone who works here, and everyone who eats here. Fuck, I even hate the delivery guys and the night cleaner.

But I can’t hate Reg yet. He reminds me

too much of Monsieur Thibault. I can’t believe how much he smokes. How good he smells.

I think about the staff meal I’ll get halfway through. I can’t stomach the veggie burger they throw together from whatever’s lying around the kitchen. It sticks like a brick. There is nothing in it but oil and fennel and the whole thing starts to taste like that dirty black liquorice jelly bean that some nasty child convinces you will taste of grape; and you think: “yeah yeah, maybe just this once this black jelly bean or candy or whatever will taste sweetly of grape.” But sure enough, there’s dirty black liquorice juice swishing all around your mouth, and you feel like spitting the black saliva all over that nasty child who tricked you. It’s only unfortunate that I can’t spit the fennel-burger back on the chef.

They fired me in hot pants.It’s the mid-afternoon lull, and the restau-

rant is dead quiet. Reg is behind the bar play-ing dirty hip hop loud on our sound system, and cracking me up by singing along. In his raspy voice, he raps, “Took the panties off and the pussy was stankin’. Pulled off the draw-ers and I started to begin. Now the pussy’s wet so my dick slides in.” I hate how much I like him, how I can only smell him up close. I can’t help but freeze when he hands me clean teacups to put away or lights my cigarette.

People flood in around seven, and I hardly see Reg the whole night. We only get to talk

HOTPANTS

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009 13

too much of Monsieur Thibault. I can’t believe how much he smokes. How good he smells.

I think about the staff meal I’ll get halfway through. I can’t stomach the veggie burger they throw together from whatever’s lying around the kitchen. It sticks like a brick. There is nothing in it but oil and fennel and the whole thing starts to taste like that dirty black liquorice jelly bean that some nasty child convinces you will taste of grape; and you think: “yeah yeah, maybe just this once this black jelly bean or candy or whatever will taste sweetly of grape.” But sure enough, there’s dirty black liquorice juice swishing all around your mouth, and you feel like spitting the black saliva all over that nasty child who tricked you. It’s only unfortunate that I can’t spit the fennel-burger back on the chef.

They fired me in hot pants.It’s the mid-afternoon lull, and the restau-

rant is dead quiet. Reg is behind the bar play-ing dirty hip hop loud on our sound system, and cracking me up by singing along. In his raspy voice, he raps, “Took the panties off and the pussy was stankin’. Pulled off the draw-ers and I started to begin. Now the pussy’s wet so my dick slides in.” I hate how much I like him, how I can only smell him up close. I can’t help but freeze when he hands me clean teacups to put away or lights my cigarette.

People flood in around seven, and I hardly see Reg the whole night. We only get to talk

when I order martinis for my tables from him. If Reg had his way, he’d strike all the fruity liquor off of our drink menu.

“Mrs. Botox wants some vodka with her syrup, eh?” He leans over the bar. “Why doesn’t anyone ever order a cold fucking beer?”

Ten tables and 80 tip dollars later, Reg is enter-taining me and four other male staff: a busboy, a waiter, the dishwasher, and the bigger boss, Carl. We’re smoking outside, in the front where passers-by can overhear everything they say. They light up while debating the best Father’s Day activity; an Alouettes football game, smoked meat, and a massage parlour are suggested in turn. Mention of the massage parlour starts Reg reminiscing about a pre-marriage gift. His brother bought him a surprise happy-endings massage or something equally banal. After Reg sat through the entire massage, the masseuse, then topless, asked him to turn over on his back to finish him off with a hand job.

I’m trying to listen with restrained femi-nine interest, but my head is spinning. If I butt out and head back inside, I’m a prude, and if I’m too interested, I’m a slutty horndog, or perhaps better: a lesbian.

“I burst out laughing. And then, I couldn’t stop laughing. She was sloshing her tits up there and her nipples were fucking big.”

I think about my nipples. I’m the only one who’s got some that are bigger than Canadian quarters.

“That whore’s huge nipples took up about a third of her tits. And those were pretty fuck-ing huge to begin with.” Reg and the other three laugh and laugh and I hope my smile is enough.

Reg looks at me. I know I should shrink away and go polish something. I know he’s wondering if my un-laughing smile means that my nipples are huge like the masseuse’s.

I meet his eyes for a while, appalled and confounded by the knowledge that we are both appraising my nipples. I think about Monsieur Thibault, and I wonder if I even knew I had any then.

We catch each other’s eye for a second and I hear it out loud before it crosses my mind.

“And I take it your wife’s are so small and so perfect they look like itty bitty mosquito bites?”

No one laughs. Their glares make it clear that Reg’s wife has nothing to do with the masseuse story. But once I brought her up, it’s not fun anymore to laugh about saucer-sized nipples. So we all go back inside.

I busy myself by folding napkins, shin-ing glasses, and refilling the peanuts behind the bar. Carl, who has been trying to can my blonde ass ever since I started, approaches Reg, seeing the hatred in his eyes, and asks him how my shift went.

“I never want to see her face again.”Carl doesn’t ask any questions and even

offers me a cigarette before he fires me by the dumpster out back in hot pants.

A story by The Daily’sShannon Kiely

Nad

ja P

opov

ich

/ Th

e M

cGill

Dai

ly

I read something on the back of a toilet stall last week that made my Intro to Philosophy class look like

playtime in kindergarten. It wasn’t the latest in Chuck Norris-isms; nei-ther was it a telephone number and address left by “Blowin’ Joe.” No, my unknown washroom scribbler etched the following words into the pale green door: “...the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the indepen-dence of solitude.”

Now before we even get to the famous author of these words we have to ask ourselves through what perspective did this person write them. Were they using a grand anal-ogy to describe the concentration required to successfully act out the necessary deeds (namely number one and two) in a crowded wash-room? Quite possibly. But most of us are capable of doing this, and surely the term “great man” isn’t attributed to us all.

To solve this mystery let us look at the original creator of this quote. Ironically, I’ve lately been reading ran-dom tidbits of this American philoso-pher, essayist, and poet. Ralph Waldo Emerson spoke to large crowds in his day and was considered the intel-lectual leader of the U.S. at the time.

Whether or not he thought his legacy would be continued on bathroom stalls is debatable. But when asked to sum up his years of work, he said that his central doctrine was “the infini-tude of the private man.”

Ah-ha! Where are we most con-cerned about our privacy if not at the urinal (for some of us) or on the pot (for all of us)? Now now, don’t get all riled up. I’m not trying to turn exceptional thought into potty humour. What I’m trying to say is that although A does not look or sound anything like Z, it can help you get there. We may not want or need to use our various toilet experiences as tools to live as great men and women – but it can’t hurt.

We live in a very busy world where the crowd can pull you every which way. A world racked with possible rights and wrongs, and shook with potential good and bad. Trying to draw the lines according to today’s varying societal psyches can hardly lead to a “perfect sweetness.” Maybe we need to transplant our bathroom skills into the rest of our lives. And by bathroom skills I mean the mere ability to want to remain in “the inde-pendence of solitude.”

Yes, we need to work together as a society and yes, there is strength in

unity, but also yes, we need to allow ourselves to be okay with creating and keeping our own unique selves. Selves that can stand strong alone if need be. When glancing through history, it is often these selves that managed to calm a storm, endorse a freedom, or save a life.

Now it could very well be that your

sense of self totally disagrees with all of my philosophical philander-ing, and that you would like to use this column for your next trip to the washroom. That’s fine, you are obvi-ously already very much in the per-fect sweetness of the independence of solitude.

As for me, I’m hunting out toilet

stalls to see when the mystery quoter strikes again.

Whether its Shakespeare or Voltaire, I’ll be there.

Commentary The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 200914

Johanu Botha

Life Lines

The curious case of Geert Wilders

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” – Voltaire

It’s 8:45 a.m. on the morning of November 2, 2004, and the streets are crowded. Nice day out.

Suddenly the man in front of you is blindsided by an attacker, shot, and repeatedly stabbed. He is able to crawl across the street in a futile attempt to escape. The attacker, a man in a long robe known as a djelleba, takes out his butcher knife and slits his victim’s throat. He then stabs him again, this time lodging on the victim’s body a note, a part of which reads: “Islam will be victorious through the blood of the martyrs. They will spread its light in every dark corner of this

earth and it will drive evil with the sword if necessary back into its dark hole.”

What was the victim’s offence, that he deserved such nasty fate? Well, he made a movie critical of Islam’s treat-ment of women.

But here’s the catch: On what city’s streets do you think this might have happened? Islamabad? Kabul? Tehran? No.

Amsterdam.And what did the Queen of the

Netherlands do? She skipped the funeral and instead visited a Moroccan community centre, the nationality of the assailant, to express solidarity.

Look now, four and a half years later, at Amsterdam, that temple of liberal freedom. Last week, a Dutch

court demanded that Geert Wilders, a controversial member of Parliament, be charged “for inciting hatred and discrimination, based on comments by him in various media on Muslims and their beliefs.”

Some background: Wilders made a short film last year called Fitna, which, according to a Turkish news-paper, is Arabic for “disagreement and division among people.” The 16-minute, amusingly low-budget film interspersed scenes of Islam-inspired carnage with rather bellicose and (arguably) cherry-picked verses from the Koran. The film caused a massive international row; the Dutch govern-ment supplied its embassies and con-sulates around the world with evacua-tion plans in the event of emergency.

Afraid of repeating the events that unfolded in the wake of the Danish cartoon controversy, they then told him to shut his mouth. He didn’t shut his mouth. So they’re hauling his ass off to jail.

Saith the court: “Mr. Wilders’s views constitute a criminal offence. [He] has insulted Islamic worship-pers by attacking the symbols of the Islamic faith.”

Repugnant and impolite though Wilders’s foolish statements may be, surely we can all agree that his illib-eral transgressions are hardly worse than those of this censorious court?

John Stuart Mill writes in his sem-inal essay, “On Liberty,” that when a society restricts free speech it is really the society itself that suffers: “Unless [the received opinion] is suf-fered to be, and actually is, vigorously and earnestly contested, it will…be held in the manner of a prejudice, with little comprehension or feeling of its rational grounds.”

I suppose we can consider that the “received opinion” the Dutch court is trying to protect is religious plurality. Mill goes on: “The mean-ing of the doctrine itself will be in danger of being lost, or enfeebled, and deprived of its vital effect on the character and conduct: the dogma becoming a mere formal profession, inefficacious for good, but cumber-ing the ground, and preventing the growth of any real and heartfelt conviction, from reason or personal experience.”

We do both disservice and disre-spect to Islam when we handle it with

kid gloves; we impeach the integrity of religious plurality when we pre-serve it in a padded playroom.

Of course Geert Wilders is a schmuck. In 2007, he wrote a col-umn in the Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant saying that the Koran should be banned. He’s no better. And of course, he provokes just to get a rise out of people, not just Muslims. He knows what he’s doing.

Still, nothing changes. Alas, the debate here is not about Islam, but freedom of expression. Banning books is never okay. Neither is pros-ecuting someone merely for “incit-ing discrimination.” Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, I’m looking at you.

Please don’t rely on my brief intro-duction to the case. Look it up for yourself, and see how you feel about it. Your reaction will say a lot about the content of your character. To quote Christopher Hitchens, “I don’t ask what people’s politics are. I ask what their principles are.”

Ricky Kreitner

Piñata diplomacy

Finding wisdom in the third stall from the right

Ricky’s column appears Monday. Send schmucks and freedoms to pinatadiplomacy@mcgilldaily.com.

This is pretty much what the mythical Sean Turner looked like. I heard he ate parrots for brunch.

Ben Peck / The McGill Daily

Johanu’s column appears every Monday. Do you like potty phiso-lophy? Send some of your shit to lifelines@mcgilldaily.com.

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009 15Commentary

COMMENT

I have spent much of my political energy since I began high school fighting for the civil and human

rights of Palestinians. Yet I feel dras-tically misrepresented when anyone refers to me or my views as “pro-Palestine” or “anti-Israel,” as though I favour one of the two peoples above the other. I am deeply committed to standing in solidarity with both Israelis and Palestinians who have suffered from this conflict, which seems to have gotten incrementally worse, more violent, more heart-breaking and more insurmountable with each passing year since it began. But insofar as I believe in democracy and racial equality, I am an anti-Zion-ist.

The irony is that I often share more common ground with hard-line Zionists than North America’s peculiar brand of “liberal Zionists,” who tend to assert that Israel, though a Jewish state, manages to evade the travesty of being a racist state. And, like many right-wing Zionists, I don’t believe that Israel’s annexation of the remainder of Mandate Palestine in 1967 was any less justified than the displacement of 750,000 Palestinians from their homes – often at gunpoint – in 1948.

These are notions of Israel’s iden-tity that North Americans are much more uncomfortable with than most Jewish Israelis. When I would raise the point in my protracted and ago-nising arguments with them that every racist state in history has relied on a certain amount of violence – and has generally incurred violent backlashes in turn – their responses were less a rebuke than an affirma-tion: that is why we need to win, they would say.

Beyond the obvious asymmetries in its immigration policy – the fact that a Canadian-born Jew like myself is actively encouraged to “make ali-yah” whilst millions of Palestinian refugees are denied the right to return to their ancestral lands – Israel severely enforces the doctrine of racial hegemony within its own pre-1967 borders.

In legal spheres, the debate is less about whether Israel is a rac-ist state than about whether it has that right to be so. One of the most important revelations of my time in Israel-Palestine concerned the plight of Israeli Arabs, who constitute 20 per cent of Israeli citizens, and pay

their taxes like everyone else, yet are treated as second-class citizens by the state. It bears noting that higher birth rates amongst this minority con-stitute what is commonly referred to as the “demographic threat” in Israeli politics.

The most marginalized group among Israeli Arabs are the 160,000 Bedouin living in the Negev desert – a territory which, like the West Bank, has seen segregation carried out to such an extent that walls have been erected around Jewish communi-ties while Arab homes are arbitrarily deemed illegal and are subject to frequent demolition. Effectively, the Negev Bedouin are living under occupation too.

Thirty-six of their communities have been denied recognition by the state for years if not decades, and are thus bereft of running water, electric-ity, and decent schools, while recog-nized Arab communities are granted control over a paltry three per cent of the territory inside Israel proper. With little access to educational or land-based resources, these com-munities are among Israel’s poor-est. Numerous reports – including some, like the Or and Goldberg Commissions, that were authorized by the Israeli government itself – have concluded that Arab-Israelis’ marginalization is a direct result of their treatment by the state.

There are not many of us who favour a one-state solution, but as the prospect of the two-state dwindles, support for an equal and unified Israeli-Palestinian state has timorous-ly begun to grow on both sides of the Green Line. My beef is not with the people of Israel but with the ideol-ogy of their state. Tying one’s identity to the sustenance of Israel’s Jewish ethnocracy is convenient for some because it gives them an opportunity to impugn anti-Zionism as anti-Sem-itism. But being half-Israeli myself, I still have virtually no understand-ing of how the concept of Jewish hegemony can be reconciled with that of racial equality. Segregation is not an issue that is exclusive to the West Bank, and there will come a time when Israel will have to decide whether it would rather be a nation of equitable democratic exchange or continue down its current path of systematic racial exclusivity and ghet-toisation.

Forgiving a racist stateZionism and Israel’s Arab ghettos

Niko Block

Much of the debate over the conflict between Israel and Palestine has polarized

these pages, with students clinging to antagonisitc beliefs despite their strong tendency to mar the potential for progress. If we are truly interest-ed in a resolution to the conflict, we must recognize that Palestinian and Israeli identities cannot continue to compete for existence.

Political science literature sug-gests that the zero-sum relationship between Israeli and Palestinian iden-tities can only be ameliorated if each side’s survival is not rooted in repudi-ating the existence of the other. But the campus’s response the recent cri-sis in Gaza and Israel has been disap-pointing because it has perpetuated these identity forms.

For instance, two weeks ago I received an invitation from Hillel -McGill for a Support Israel Rally, and in McLennan I was also confronted by a display about the humanitarian emergency in Gaza. I believe send-ing aid to the Palestinians is crucial; however, what I found disconcerting about the display was that as a Jew, I felt I was being attacked with anti-Israeli sentiments. As an intellectual, multi-cultural, and open-minded group of students, we must initiate a process of recognition whereby these contending identities can coexist on a local level.

The competing Palestinian and

Israeli narratives of the conflict fos-ter an irrational understanding of it because each side envisions itself as the rightful actor and the other as the malicious enemy. Moral analysis of the conflict links each group’s sur-vival and identity to the core issues of Nationhood, Right of Return and Refugees, and the status of Jerusalem. Living in the diaspora – whether Jewish or Palestinian – offers us an opportunity to remove our sense of survival from the need to deny the existence of the opposing identity by using the resources we have to coop-erate in an environment shielded from violence.

Harvard Professor and Researcher Herbert C. Kelman wrote an arti-cle explaining how the Israeli and Palestinian identities thrive on negative interdependence. Their identities rely on zero-sum rela-tions whereby the existence of one negates the existence of the other; a gain for one side translates into a loss for the other. Author Paul Scham further argues that Palestinians and Israelis must recognize the “contra-dictions between the two narratives rather than attempting to overcome or ignore them. The logical result of that might well be an Israeli state that would celebrate Israeli Independence on the fifth day of the Hebrew month of Iyar, as it is currently commemo-rated in Israel, and also acknowl-edge with sadness Naqba Day on the fifteenth of May, as it is currently mourned among Palestinians.”

I implore McGill’s Jewish and

Arab groups to unite their efforts in educating students about the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Not only will this be an experiment in diplomacy, it will be a testament to our potential as students to mend the fractures that divide our community.

Additionally, Kelman asserts that “the only way, in which, in the long run, Israelis can survive, feel secure, develop, prosper, and fulfill them-selves as a people is for Palestinians to survive, feel secure, develop, pros-per, and fulfill themselves, and vice versa.” Wearing the Star of David can-not imply a dismissal of Palestinian rights, just as Arab heritage should not be associated with anti-Semitism.

My grandfather was the only per-son from his family to survive the Holocaust, and following his libera-tion from Auschwitz he moved to Israel. This personal connection to the hope that Israel inspires should not suggest that I believe that Jews have an absolute right to the State of Israel and that Palestinians do not. We have to move beyond the infer-ences and assumptions that blemish our relations so that our understand-ings of each other are not dictated by hate and rather built on a belief that we can learn from past persecutions. We can only separate ourselves from our contentious past if we make a sin-cere effort to transform our present.

HYDE PARK

Daniela Porat

Aquil Virani / The McGill Daily

Niko Block is a U1 Economics stu-dent and a Daily staffer. Write him at niko.block@mail.mcgill.ca.

Opinion-y opinion ‘pinion.Want more?

Check out Second Opinion and The Technopolis at mcgilldaily.com/blogs.

Daniela Porat is a U1 Political Science and Art History student, and you can reach her at daniela.porat@mail.mcgill.ca.

Competing identities block the road to peace

Over the past week, an over-populated territory about one third of the size of

London has been the scene of heavy fighting. Trapped between two fronts, hundreds of civilian casual-ties – some of them children killed inside their schools – are reported by international agencies. The UN estimates that about a quarter mil-lion more are in immediate danger of death. The local government is refusing any humanitarian ceasefire, and even hindering the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) rescue operations. Its stated goal is

to once and for all “eradicate the reb-els.”

Does this ring a bell? Probably not – because, really, who has heard about the crisis in Sri Lanka? Have you seen the Sri Lankan flag on the cover of The Daily? The double stan-dards of the passionate compassion-ates are sometimes troubling.

At the SSMU General Assembly (GA) this Thursday, students will be debating a motion brought forth by Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR) that calls on the Society to both publicly condemn the military action in Gaza, as well as to support education Palestinian right to education. SPHR suggests that public initiatives could take the form of “campaigns, educational lec-ture series, forums and/or fundrais-ing initiatives to support students in Gaza.”

While the SSMU constitution empowers Council to “take all action on behalf of the Society,” this motion

would mandate the SSMU Council to “condemn the bombing of the educational institutions in Gaza,” and would engage SSMU to issue “a public statement of condemnation immediately,” calling on McGill to do the same.

But one can’t help but wonder whether the GA will debate a motion calling on SSMU to support the stu-dents in Mullaitivu, and this causes me some concern.

Now, I don’t doubt SPHR’s good intentions in writing the motion, but the resolution is blatantly one-sided, arguably falls outside of SSMU’s by-laws, and perhaps most importantly is dividing our campus further by turn-ing it into an ideological war field. SSMU is not the UN, though it may be just as dysfunctional. Regardless, Article 22 of the SSMU Constitution states, “SSMU Council will not take a position on external political issues that Council deems to be extremely divisive among students at McGill

University.” This essentially means that the motion in its current format is not in compliance of the by-laws.

Further, the motion’s preamble makes no mention of the destruction of schools by rockets, no mention of Israeli casualties, nor does it men-tion Hamas. It gives little importance to UN Humanitarian Affairs Chief John Holmes blasting Hamas for its “cynical” use of civilian facilities, such as schools and hospitals, and reports by the UN confirming that Hamas fighters breached some of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency facilities. Clearly, this motion portrays an incredibly complex situa-tion in an utterly simplified way. This motion’s partial perspective is clearly not complying with SSMU’s guide-lines for motion writing, which state that motions should be unbiased.

One needs just take a look at our campus newspapers to realize how divisive the issue of the conflict in Israel and the Palestinian Territories

is. In particular, the last episode of fighting in Gaza has undoubtedly stirred tensions. Do we really need to add to the divide?

The Fall GA failed to reach quo-rum, but we can reject this motion by showing up this Thursday in the Shater Ballroom. Let’s make sure that we take part in upholding the SSMU Constitution, which states in its pre-amble that SSMU should “act in the best interests of its membership as a whole.”

Our best interest is not to call on SSMU to take sides in a conflict that has no sides. Our best interest is to ensure that we do not leave part of the student body unrepresented by SSMU’s statements. An educational institution like McGill should have none of us feel alienated by the posi-tions of our own Society.

Commentary The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 200916

The first class I attended at McGill was in a Stuart Bio audi-torium. The professor divided

the class’s 200 students into small groups to discuss what we thought International Development was. In my group of five, two girls were from Ontario, one from a small town out-side of Philadelphia, and one from Victoria. I was the first person they’d met on campus from Montreal.

The American girl was nervous. She looked a little shell-shocked, maybe a tinch homesick, and I start-ed to wonder if there was anything I could do to make Montreal less scary

to her. I had just come back from a summer in Europe where a compas-sionate Londoner had put me up on his couch for three weeks and a French girl in San Sebastian shared her apartment when there wasn’t a free hotel or hostel bed in the city. My hosts showed me where to eat and party, and I felt more safe and oriented in those two cities than any others I visited.

I wanted to give back, befriend this freshman so I could take her to the oratory and Old Montreal, to tour little known neighbourhoods, and to sample Tibetan dumplings or Mauritian noodles.

I waited until the next week to offer myself up as Montreal-guide-

extraordinaire. This time, she walked into class giggling with two other girls and she sat with them on the other side of the auditorium.

It took me almost six months at McGill before someone explained to me what residence was. Then I finally understood that the American girl had no doubt bonded with the giggle girls on her floor, making my services completely unnecessary.

The few acquaintances I made at McGill would always run into people en route from McLennan to Leacock, and explain to me that they met in rez. It seemed what residence you spent your first year in was almost as para-mount to the McGill experience as what major you studied. Soon, I under-

stood that residence was a friendship goldmine, and that because I went to CEGEP and was a Quebecker, I had completely missed out.

See, Montrealers face a cruel and unforgiving dilemma. It’s laugh-ably cheap to come to McGill and relatively easy to get in. One of the best schools in Canada is right at our doorstep, and we can even keep living with our parents! How can we refuse? And trust me, we don’t. With Concordia and Université de Montreal in the mix, I can count on one hand the number of people from my high school graduating class who went away for university.

But it’s undeniable that by missing that real first year of school, Quebec

students miss out on a fundamental part of the university experience. My closest friends went to McGill, but every one of them was from Montreal. And no matter how close I became with an out-of-town student, I could never penetrate her rez clique.

No matter how willing I was to drop cash on cabs back from the St. Laurent strips or savvy on the metro, the fact I lived at home and out of the Ghetto always seemed to matter in my friendships with non-Quebec students.

COMMENT

HYDE PARK

Perle Nicolle

Shannon Kiely is The Daily’s coor-dinating news editor. You can cheat on your Anglo cliques at news@mcgilldaily.com.

Just say no to double standards

Perle Nicolle is a U4 Mechanical Engineering student, reachable at perle.nicolle@mail.mcgill.ca.

Shannon Kiely

And don’t let our focus on Gaza distract us from other crises

Sally Lin / The McGill Daily

One year too lateTales from a Montrealer’s isolating rez-less experience

A is for Asset Backed Commercial Paper (ABCP) – These are investments

designed to generate income off of repayment of interest on loans such as mortgages. The market for this was frozen back in 2007 when many Canadian banks realized that a lot of their ABCP were tied to the bursting U.S. housing bubble. Realizing that a lot of these investments are held in pensions, the Canadian government became the guarantor to the tune of $32-billion. Not to be an alarmist but if this hadn’t been done, there was a chance your parents could be fucked into financial oblivion in the future.

B is for Bailout – A bailout is an act of giving a loan to a firm to pre-vent it from falling into financial ruin. When all streams are exhausted, the government is usually the lender of last resort to step in.

C is for Credit Default Swap (CDS) – Imagine that you own a home. Imagine that you buy insurance for that home. To do so, someone evalu-ates the value of said home – say $100,000 and then decides they’ll sell insurance on it if you pay them $10/month. If this home burns down,

the insurer is obligated to give you $100,000. Now imagine a world where instead of buying insurance on your home, you can sell insurance on your own home to someone else. Now when your home burns down you’re on tap to pay the person you sold that insurance to for $100,000. Now imagine that in the same world, your neighbour can sell insurance on your home to someone else and your home burns down; your neighbour now owes someone $100,000 as well. And that is in a nutshell is how a CDS market worked – except that it’s val-ued at $56-trillion dollars.

D is for Depression – The feeling I get when I listen to Arcade Fire – it also describes a severe downturn an economy that will make the act of listening to Arcade Fire feel more euphoric than a couple experiencing simultaneous orgasms.

E is for Economy – Something that once resembled a reliable Swiss watch but now resembles a cheap Chinese knock-off labeled “Rollecks” that you can buy on the street for $5.

F is for Federal Reserve Bank – An American governmental institution responsible for handling monetary supplies, the regulating financial sys-tem and providing financial services to the U.S. government. In recent years, it has also become an institu-tion responsible for bailing out the asses of everyone who makes more than $1-million a year.

G is for Golden Parachute – A large sum of money given to a CEO when they leave their job for things ranging from being fired, resigning,

retirement, going to prison or run-ning a company and the pensions of all the employees to work for said company into the ground. Who says we live in a meritocracy?

H is for Housing Bubble – A rise in demand for property, in this case fueled by low interest rates and loose lending regulations. Of course, this was nay followed by the housing burst, when people realize that they can’t afford the homes they bought and all the paper assets tied into them become worthless leading us to where we are today.

I is for Investment Banking Industry – Once the dream destina-tion of many of the world’s finance majors, like the dodo bird and civi-lized debates on Israel-Palestine, the investment banking industry no lon-ger exists.

J is for Jobs – Or lack thereof.K is for Kondratiev Waves – A

non-mainstream theory proposed by a Soviet Economist in the 1910s. The basic gist of the theory is that the economy moves in large 40-50 year cycles with major ups and major downs. If you buy into the theory and its projections, it basically states that we are in the midst of entering the worst recession seen since the 1750s. I actually have nothing snarky to say here because I don’t want karma to bite me in the ass if this scenario comes true.

Gilad Ben-Shach did make a good point in his January 22 article “Applying some

logic to conflict terminology,” when he said, “I hope The Daily adopts more rigorous editing procedures, so that the situation is properly por-trayed.” I couldn’t believe he got his Mathematical “proof” to be pub-lished.

As a math student, I couldn’t stand seeing my noble field being exploited and misused. A proof he calls it? Let me have the pleasure of rewriting his proof for you.

In the math field, whenever some-one makes a claim, we never believe it unless we prove it. So let’s start with a claim. “Israel doesn’t occupy or siege Gaza, and Hamas rockets are threatening Israel’s existence.”

Just to clarify something for the non-mathematicians, I don’t think I’ll be proving my claim if I follow Gilad’s “logic” by just saying, “Period.” after my claim. I actually need to prove the claim.

I need to find some evidence for my claim by actually doing some

research. Here’s what I find: the Guardian says that Israel killed in three weeks around 1,400 people and injured another 5,000, 60 per cent or more were women and children. But this isn’t really helping my proof.

I found that a Washington Post article, “Israeli Siege Leaves Gaza Isolated and Desperate,” the Independent, and Amnesty International have numerous similar articles. Please email me if you need links. In math, we call news like these “counterexamples.” If one counterex-ample is made to a claim, then our claim automatically fails. Here we have three counterexamples; we are in trouble.

We conclude that our claim “Israel doesn’t siege Gaza” is false. Given the new evidence, let’s fix our ini-tial claim, “Israel sieges Gaza killing 1,400 and injuring 5,000 but doesn’t occupy it, and Hamas rockets are threatening Israel’s existence.”

Further investigation by the New York Times uncovers that Israel admits using white phosphorus in its war on Gaza. Israel doesn’t seem to care. It would’ve used nuclear weap-ons if it could, but that would be dan-gerous for its people who live very

close to Gaza. Math is all about logic, yet not all

mathematicians get that. If we state the facts, we find that the rockets fired from Gaza killed less than 30 people from 2008 up until today. The rockets cannot travel beyond a 50-kilometre radius. To keep my dignity as a mathematician, I cannot really conclude that Hamas rockets are threatening Israel’s existence.

My claim isn’t sound in the math-ematical world. I’ll have to change it again to gain acceptance in my logical field. “Israel sieges Gaza killing 1,400 and injuring 5,000 but doesn’t occupy it, and Hamas rockets don’t threaten Israel’s existence.” My claim now has passed the testing phase and is con-sidered valid. The process we walked through is called a “proof.”

If Hamas doesn’t threaten Israel’s existence, then why did Israel drench its hands in blood? A question I leave for the other mathematicians to deal with.

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009 17Commentary

Stimulus shmimulus! That was about all Andrew Coyne had to say about the Conservatives’

new budget on last Wednesday’s broadcast of CBC’s The National. A London School of Economics alumn and former columnist with the National Post, Coyne has long been a defender of freer markets, lower taxes, and smaller government. Everyone expected that he would strongly denounce the oh-so-stimu-lating budget as a reckless spending spree, but his criticism went much further than that.

Having come so close to seeing Charles Darwin’s 200th birthday, Mr. Coyne believes that conservatism has gone the way of the dodo. He could barely contain his disgust in stating that the Conservatives’ embrace of counter-cyclical spending means the “extinction of conservatism as any kind of coherent political movement or philosophy” in Canada. These are strong words from a man who is often touted around in the media as a prominent right-winger.

But we really should give the fiscal conservatives a break – they’ve been so frustrated for so long. Contrary to popular opinion on campus, Stephen Harper has presided over the fastest increase in the size of the federal gov-ernment in a generation. Even when adjusted for inflation and population growth, his Finance Minister has introduced the largest budgets our nation has ever seen. And that was true before the global financial crisis led to the re-embrace of Keynesian economics.

The Prime Minister would likely argue that he’s spent previous bil-lions in a responsible and productive manner, something about fixing a fis-cal imbalance, cutting the GST, and buying our army guns to shoot ter-rorists with. He’d probably argue that the current billions will be spent to build needed infrastructure and help our economy overcome the worst non-violent threat to our lifestyle since the Great Depression. He is an economist after all. Nevertheless, what does it mean for Conservatives to question some tenants of this

thing called “fiscal conservatism?” And without it as a bedrock, what is left to unite Conservatives except for the even less sexy option of “social conservatism?”

I would argue that it is healthy for a political party to occasionally ques-tion some of its most strongly-held beliefs. All parties are necessarily amorphous to a certain extent, and alter policy based on systemic chang-es or revised philosophy. It would also be completely irresponsible and, well, just downright unconservative to ignore world events simply because they might question some of your ideas. Liberals and socialists are sup-posed to be the ones with their heads stuck in the sand waiting for earthly utopias, not good conservatives.

And so a confluence of factors has forced our current government to rethink their usual rhetoric about lower taxes and prudent spending. The specter of a global depression has led them to spend billions in the hopes of filling in for a slack in con-sumer demand. A triad of opposition parties has threatened them with a veritable coup unless they can shovel the money out fast enough. And still, an endless array of interest groups and experts claim that even more red ink should be spilled to drown our economic woes; not to mention the media’s stimulus envy whenever our piddling sums are compared to the girth of the American package.

While I respectfully disagree with Mr. Coyne about conservatism’s fate, it is undeniable that a paradigm shift is occurring. Quite frankly, I think it’s about time. The develop-ment in Afghanistan is not going fast enough, our economy remains heav-ily dependent on natural resources, a separatist party holds undue sway in Parliament, too many First Nations people live in rural slums, and global issues of hunger and climate change have been ignored. Conservative politics can offer solutions to all of these. It’s high time my party moved beyond tax cuts.

HYDE PARK

Bring on stimulating conservatism

Clarke Olsen

Clarke Olsen is a U3 Political Science and Economics student, and the President of Conservative McGill. You can reach him at clarke.olsen@mail.mcgill.ca.

HYDE PARK

You call that proof?Mohamed Smaoui

Mohamed Smaoui is a U2 Math & Computer Science student. You can contact him at mohamed.smaoui@mail.mcgill.ca.

Evan Newton / The McGill Daily

The ABCs of the economic crisisA primer on all the terms you’ve heard but didn’t understand

HYDE PARK

Duong Pham

Duong Pham is a U3 Economics stu-dent. Stay tuned for L-Z next week, and send optimism to duong.pham@mail.mcgill.ca.

Photo Essay The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 200918

les questions sans réponses

roxy kirshenbaum

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009Culture 19

Revolution for the free love setMusical at McGill challenges sixties ideals but remains upbeat

Peace, love, and drug abuse. Few decades in the 20th century saw such widespread challenges to estab-lished social authority and values like the 1960s.

With President Barack Obama’s charm and charisma elic-iting comparisons to JFK, and America’s engagement in multiple overseas conflicts, the sixties have lost none of their contemporary relevance. Following a group of draft-dodging, pot-smoking New York City hippies, the musical HAIR offers an interesting take on what this counter cul-ture movement was all about.

HAIR is being performed at Moyse Hall this week, pre-sented by the Arts Undergraduate Theatre Society. The production deals with a variety of social issues important at that time, such as patriotism, drug use, free love, and the draft. Although generally supportive of the hippies and their ideals, the musical is also often critical of their lifestyle of irresponsibility and excess. Throughout the play, they continually consume large amounts of marijua-na and engage in impulsive sexual activity, with whomev-er is present at the moment. One character casually refers to asking her parents for money because she has become pregnant.

The musical also challenges American patriotism and

the militaristic tendencies associated with it. This recur-ring theme is exemplified in a scene in which the hippies march in file chanting “Hell no! We won’t go!” In another scene, a variety of important American political and mili-tary figures are satirized onstage – for instance, George Washington lights up a joint.

These critiques of American militarism directly relate to the Vietnam War, for which several of the characters have been drafted to fight. The hippies hold a “Be-In,” a symbolic demonstration which has the characters burn their draft cards and take part in an orgy afterward. Yet one character has his doubts, as his parents have repeat-edly told him that he needs to grow up and take respon-sibility for himself, and that joining the army would be an ideal opportunity to do so. Parents such as these, many of whom had fought in WWII and live by a strikingly differ-ent set of values than their children, offer a striking gen-erational contrast to the youth of the hippie movement, .

Yet while the musical tackles these different issues, it continually maintains a highly energetic and upbeat feel. The singing is also full of energy, and interaction with the audience made it all the more engaging. The depiction of psychedelic drugs in the McGill produc-tion is also excellent, with its use of striking colours and imagery. Indeed, HAIR deals with an interesting historical period while challenging our conceptions of that time.

Ryan MacKellarThe McGill Daily

Stephen Davis / The McGill Daily

Culture The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 200920

The latest film from Quebecoise filmmaker and Concordia Professor Guylaine Dionne,

Waitresses Wanted (Serveuses Demandées, 2008) opens and closes with a passing stream of faces: all young, all beautiful, and all illegal immigrants working as exotic danc-ers in the trashy strip club L’Elixir in downtown Montreal.

Janaina Suaudeau plays Priscilla Paredes, a 22-year-old who left Brazil four years earlier in search of a better life and job in Canada. Yet when her student visa expires, Priscilla’s desire to stay forces her to answer L’Elixir’s call for “Serveuses Demandées” and join this circle of desperate girls with similar stories to her own. It is here she meets and falls for the confi-dent and aggressively sexual Milagro (Clara Furey). While Priscilla is intent on staying in Canada, Milagro wants nothing more than to leave; ironi-cally, her dream is to travel to Brazil. Waitresses Wanted explores the love between the two girls as a means of escape – and then survival – while facing the sex, drugs, and violent oppression that mark their lives.

Another Canadian feature about a strip club, Atom Egoyan’s Exotica (1994) revolves around a group of people connected through a Toronto nightclub of the same name. Egoyan and Dionne’s films illustrate the way Canadian filmmakers often employ sexuality to highlight deeper psycho-logical or political issues – that is, nei-

ther Exotica nor Waitresses Wanted is merely about sex, and perhaps each film’s conspicuously low sexual content points to the larger themes at work. It seems Exotica and L’Elixir serve as cen-tres around which characters come together and clash out of desperation. Both films question what – beyond sex – drives people to these situations.

Yet while Egoyan brilliantly suc-ceeds in framing his characters’ yearning for connection, Dionne’s lack of character development keeps them at arm’s-length. Perhaps most importantly, the love between Priscilla and Milagro fails to develop beyond the poignant scenes of them dancing together early in the story. Though Suaudeau and Furey’s indi-vidual performances merit due rec-ognition, together they do not dis-play a great deal of chemistry, and their relationship is hard to follow in the latter half of the film. In turn, Dionne falls short in sustaining the audience’s empathy for her charac-ters, and the film’s slow progression makes it easy to lose interest.

It seems Waitresses Wanted is reaching – trying too hard to be heavy and to convey a depth that does not surface on-screen. Martha Wainwright’s repeated mournful drone in the background feels dis-jointed and points to the dispar-ity between content and style that endures throughout the film. That Dionne comes from a background in documentary film perhaps explains why she expects the film’s theme to speak for itself, yet the story does not come alive under her direction and its ending feels incomplete.

Shea SinnottCulture Writer

Quebec strip club film’s flat characters fail to inspire empathy

The title of this short film screening couldn’t have been more fitting. It very neatly

summed up the feel of the films, as different as they were. I’m talking here of the Images in Time//Images in a Time of War short film screen-ing at Concordia last Friday. Most of the short films were touchingly personal – they were shot in living rooms and in local cafés in Baghdad, at weddings, and even funerals. They showed everyday situations, in which even during wartime people made the effort to retain at least the illu-sion of calm and peace.

I was hooked from the first film.Untitled Part 3 told the story from the viewpoint of a house: the man behind the camera had come back to his old house to find it in ruins. The house tells him what has happened in his

absence. One of the most humbling stories was about a Lebanese security service employee, who was assigned to film an important section of sea-shore promenade from a van. At the same time every day, he would focus away from the people he was sup-posed to film and instead fix the lens on the sun descending over the sea. He was found out and fired, but got to keep his sunsets.

Another one of my favourite scenes was from Baghdad in No Particular Order, which was a sort of patchwork of stories. This one showed a Mosque prayer leader sit-ting in his living room singing “She’s a Lady” and other classics to the cam-era, surrounded by what appeared to be giggling family members. In another portion I got the opportuni-ty to hear the Arabic version of “I Will Always Love You,” blasting from the speakers in a taxi as huge oil trucks passed by.

I particularly enjoyed how the

films covered a varied range of places, moments in time, and styles of filming. There was black and white film from the sixties; several of them blended photos and film recordings; some had

narrators, others didn’t. Some served as windows into regular people’s lives where wartime was implicit, while others were more acutely placed in the context of war. The film where the house was speaking, for example, more overtly addressed the situa-tion, and believe me when I say the

bitterness and sadness of this house was palpable. In their own unique ways, each film was effective in deliv-ering the mood of Images in Time//Images in a Times of War and made

for a broader picture of the everyday lives of people trapped in the middle of never-ending conflicts.

With the Israel-Palestine conflict looming over our consciousness, it’s easy to get muddled up by the formal discourse surrounding the issues. Political debates over the rights of

one country against the other, news channels broadcasting bombing and devastation – and what we end up with is really only brief glimpses into the eye of the storm. It’s hard to really get a sense of the places and people involved, because the lens is so explicitly aimed at the dramatic, the kind of events that – however morbid they might be – will attract most viewers. We have, then, an impression of a kind of distant night-mare, not a relatable experience of people who all have their own story to tell. This is exactly the gap that the screening filled for me.

There are millions of stories that remain untold, but it did feel like the screening shrank the space between us and the anonymous victims of war, allowing them to become human, and not only mere numbers. I can also safely say that I learned more about the reality of their experiences from this screening than from any news story out there.

Lucia SndinCulture Writer

Beyond the evening newsConcordia film screenings put a human face on distant conflicts

Kir

tstin

Li f

or T

he M

cGill

Dai

ly

Debates over countries’ rights, news channels broadcasting

bombing, and devastation – and we only end up with glimpses

into the eye of the storm

Show me more!

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009 21Culture

To qualify for student pricing, student must present either (i) a T2202a documenting 4 or more months of full-time attendance at a college or university during 2008 or (ii) a valid high school identifi cation card. Expires July 31, 2009. Must also qualify for Instant Cash Back and Cash Back products. See offi ce for details. Valid only at participating H&R Block locations in Canada. SPC Card offers valid from 08/01/08 to 07/31/09 at participating locations in Canada only. For Cardholder only. Offers may vary, restrictions may apply. Usage may be restricted when used in conjunction with any other offer or retailer loyalty card discounts. Cannot be used towards the purchase of gift cards or certifi cates.

walk in with your taxes, walk out with your money and you could win $5,000 towards a road trip. visit refundroadtrip.ca

come in today or call 1-800-HRBLOCK (472-5625)

money back

fastPriam Poulton-McGraw finds

symmetry in Brighton and

at Trafalgar Square

Overcast reflections

FINAL JEOPARDY: This delightful gathering takes place every Tuesday at 5:30 p.m. in the basement of the Shatner Building.

“...WHAT IS THE CULTURE MEETING!”

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009Compendium! 22

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16

17 18 19

20 21 22 23

24 25 26

27 28 29 30 31 32

33 34

35 36 37

38 39 40

41 42 43 44 45 46

47 48 49 50

51 52 53 54 55

56 57 58 59

60 61 62

63 64 65

Across1. Homer, e.g.5. Aquatic plant9. Swollen14. “I’m you!”15. Difficult16. “All kidding ...”17. Swiss canton18. “... there is no angel but Love”: Shakespeare19. They may be changed20. Early biblical judgement23. Big, fat mouth24. Cockeyed25. Rice variety27. Athletic supporter?28. Waylay32. Aces, sometimes33. Line filler34. Rust, e.g.35. First words38. Loops40. They may be saved41. Bad marks42. Bends44. Criminal charge47. Mosaic piece49. Surround51. Idled52. God’s beliefs56. Make fair again58. “My bad!”59. Prefix with graph

60. Allotment61. Rising locale?62. Pizazz63. Corporate department64. Counter call65. “ we forget”

Down1. Construction machine2. Anxiety3. Hit4. 1,000 kilograms5. “Beg pardon...”6. lamp7. Beam8. Improvises9. Soft stones10. Today11. Synagogue quota12. Thought13. Scorn21. Heisman or Stanly22. “I see!”26. Fiery remedy29. Bygone bird30. Depress, with “out”31. Handy33. Winds34. Black Sea port35. Kind of show36. A little of this, a little of that37. Many a state name in D.C.38. Condiments

39. Continent, sort of42. Away43. Idyllic pond44. Wine and dine45. Greek marketplace46. Hairsplitter48. Borders50. Motivate53. “Shake a leg!”54. Crown55. “ it Romantic?”57. “Rocks”

crosswordrowssorcArnie Foreman

S K I P A P A W C L A NH A N G E N E M A H O L EA L O E A N N A T A G A RH E N R Y R U T H E R F O R D

M A L L R U EM A C A W S F O W L W O EA N O N P U P A E O B IJ O E Y M C I N T Y R E M E DO L D I R O N S R A S ER E S D E N Y W A G N E R

A D O T R I OJ I M M Y S T E W A R T B I OA C A I O O Z E S I O T AP A N S T I R E S C O C KE O N S E L A T E T H Y

Solution to “Big men on campus”

With the current economic crisis turning free-mar-keters all kinds of social-

ist, one McGill student has released a study analyzing the roots of rising costs for everyday people.

It’s well known that the latest rein-carnation of the Evil Recession – aka the inevitable part of capitalism that, for lack of a better analogy, no one sends FB invites to – has resulted in hundreds of billions of condition-free dollars for automakers and Wall Streeters, but it has also added to already soaring inflation rates.

U3 Physics student O’Ria Mcrean’s report concludes that such rates have increased by 50 per cent since 2003.

“Through all the ups and mostly downs of my childhood, one thing kept constant: the price of chips, pop, and chocolate bars. One dollar each. No matter what,” McRrean said, adding that all he knew to be true in the world shattered when he went to a track meet in Grade ten at a nearby university.

“So I go to the vending machines for a post-race delight…and what do I see?” Mcrean said.

When asked what he saw, he con-tinued, “Well I see it’s gonna cost me $1.25, and I thought, ‘Excuse me Mr. Vendor but what the fuck, who the hell has an extra quarter is their pocket?’ I mean, come on.”

The report details McRean’s recov-ery from the trauma of realizing nary again would he ride his bike around

town with the same sense of self and reassurance.

“I thought that was the worst it would get – and it was, until this year, when stocks went crazy after U.S. banks realized they should stop lending money to people with no way to pay it back including themselves – thus sending up chocolate bar costs to an unprecendented $1.40.”

In a DaVinci Code-esque twist, the report concludes that in search-ing for a caffeine boost late last semester, he stumbled upon a can of killer Coke for $1.50.

“Compared to $1, my logical math skills tell me that a 50 per cent increase. So I wrote a blog post about my study’s findings and ask The Daily to cover it.”

McRean added that he always realized his general existence might be considered subpar, but this last experience really hit him.

“See, when your entire emotional stability rests on the premise that the greatest constant in life is constancy, these changes really get to you.”

His report also described the spe-cial feeling in one’s tummy rendered by the specific angles that bounce off the walls and halls and reverber-ate around one’s being in such a way that the star, moons, and sky look at each other and finally disregard the biases they once had and realizing that yes we’re all here in this universe together and yes that’s important but maybe when we’re a fish out of air and need to get fried depending on our feelings at the time because when it comes down to it there’s other fish in the pie.

Winston JeffriesThe McGill Daily

Economic crisis keeps getting shittierNew study shows inflation up 50 per cent in last six years Announcing

here on this page the first-ever

Compendium Mystery-Solving Contest.

Mystery #1: Why does one hear the sounds of magnificent

little birds chirping at the corner of Milton & Aylmer

in the morning?

Send your responses to compendium@

mcgilldaily.com by Friday, February 6 for your

chance to win big.

Lies, half-truths, and candy

Just look at them cans, thinking about life on the outside.

Spencer Duffy / The McGill Daily

The McGill Daily, Monday, February 2, 2009 23

volume 98number 31

editorial 3480 McTavish St., Rm. B-24

Montreal QC, H3A 1X9

phone 514.398.6784fax 514.398.8318

mcgilldaily.com

coordinating editor

Jennifer Markowitzcoordinating@mcgilldaily.com

coordinating news editor Shannon Kiely

news editorsErin Hale

Nicholas SmithAlison Withers

features editorClaire Caldwell

commentary&compendium editor Max Halparin

coordinating culture editor Braden Goyette

culture editors Joshua Frank

Whitney Mallett

science+technology editor Nikki Bozinoff

mind&body editor Nadja Popovich

photo editor Stephen Davis

graphics editor Evan Newton

production & design editorsWill Vanderbilt

Aaron Vansintjan

web editor Ian Beattie

copy editor Jimmy Smith

cover design Evan Newton

le délit Maysa Phares

redaction@delitfrancais.com

ContributorsNiko Block, Johanu Botha, Jeff Bishku-Aykul, Ethan

Feldman, Myles Gaulin, Humera Jabir, Shu Jiang, Roxy Kirshenbaum, Ricky Kreitner, John Lapsley,

Kristin Li, Sally Lin, Derrick Lovell, Ryan MacKellar, Perle Nicolle, Clarke Olsen, David Paluch, Ben Peck, Duong Pham, Daniela Porat, Priam Poulton-McGraw,

Todd Plummer, Dominic Popowich, Samuel Reisler, Shea Sinnott, Mohamed Smaoui, Lucia Sndin, Marc

Trussler, Aquil Virani, Arie Voorman

The Daily is proud to be a founding member of the Canadian University Press.

All contents © 2009 Daily Publications Society. All rights reserved. The content of this newspaper is the responsibil-

ity of The McGill Daily and does not necessarily represent the views of McGill University. Products or companies advertised in this newspaper are not necessarily endorsed by Daily staff.

Printed by Imprimerie Transcontinental Transmag. Anjou, Quebec. ISSN 1192-4608.

The Daily is published on most Mondays and Thursdays by the Daily Publications Society, an autonomous, not-for-profit

organization whose membership includes all McGill undergraduates and most graduate students.

3480 McTavish St., Rm. B-26Montreal QC, H3A 1X9

phone 514.398.6790fax 514.398.8318

advertising & general manager Boris Shedovtreasury & fiscal manager Pierre Bouillon

ad layout & design Geneviève Robertdps board of directors

Angel Chen, Ana Gray Richardson-Bachand,Braden Goyette, Lauren Chang MacLean, Jennifer Markowitz, Lawrence Monoson,

Maysa Phares, Perrin Valli, Eric Van Eyken (chair@dailyproductions.org)

EDITORIAL

McGill n’est pas une îleIf Quebec is a nation within a nation, we can’t help but feel that McGill

is a foreign concession. In Montreal, McGill stands for all things anglo; it was founded by an Anglican Scot, the majority of students are anglophone, and besides the French Language and Literature program, every one of the University’s departments runs in English.

While many universities function entirely in English though it isn’t the language of their host country – the American University of Paris, or International University of Bremen, to name a few – Quebec’s case is differ-ent. Here, language is politics. For centuries, one’s language has said a lot about their socio-economic status and heritage. From the 1960s onward, francophones have fought a hard, and often controversial, battle for recog-nition of their rights – which twice almost split Canada in two.

McGill students arrive in Montreal and are immersed in one of the few remaining unilingual pockets in our city. On campus, in residences, and all over the Ghetto, you can just about get away with speaking little to no French for four years. It’s easy for students to get locked into a small circuit that leaves huge portions of the city unexplored.

It’s no wonder that Montrealers sometimes think of loud, drunk McGill students as parasitic. But we wonder whether McGill’s relations with the surrounding community would improve if students could master even a conversational level of French, making it clear that both the institution and its members have taken their head out of the anglo sand and recognized that yes, in Montreal, people speak French.

Our student body’s unilingualism can make the University function like a revolving door; students arrive, give Montreal a whirl, and then, diploma in hand, fly right back to where they came from. Patterns in universities perpetuate patterns in the community as a whole.

Without knowing the language, there’s no incentive to invest in the community, and it’s next to impossible to start a career here without at least passable French.

For starters, we’d like to see Quebec culture better reflected in our aca-demic offerings. The administration and the institutional decisions McGill makes impact how students view their surroundings, even set the tone of student culture. There is only one Quebec history class running this semester, and the demand for French language classes is so high that the University prohibits part-time students from enrolling. Minimal support of French culture sends the green light to students that they too can ignore it.

McGill needs to provide more opportunities for anglophone students to integrate with the surrounding community – outside the framework of a three-credit French class.

With better publicity and investments in the French program, the University can make French more accessible and popular. The University should start by more prominently advertising French classes in the course calendar for U0 students, and departments like English and Anthropology could easily incorporate a greater emphasis on Quebec culture in their courses. The French as a Second Language department is already over-loaded, and students need more than just a class to truly embrace French.

We considered whether requiring a French language class before gradu-ation was the solution to McGill’s unilingualism, but realized just one class hardly does enough to introduce students to a culture.

Instead, we urge McGill to set up a French homestay program as an alternative to residence. We urge McGill to advertise the federal govern-ment’s J’explore program, which funds six weeks of homestay and French classes in small Quebec towns – and to support similar initiatives for non-Canadian students. Although McGill is underfunded, we suspect the pro-vincial government would help; it’s in Quebec’s interest to keep McGill’s graduates here.

Whatever route it chooses, McGill must work with the province to pro-vide students with more opportunities to immerse themselves in the lan-guage and culture of this province.

†On select 3-year plans. Offers subject to change without notice. *Available with any BlackBerry device with subscription to select plans and activation with BlackBerry Internet Service. Includes unlimited personal e-mail (up to 10 accounts) while using BlackBerry on theRogers Wireless network. See rogers.com/unlimited for plans and details. Usage subject to Rogers Terms of Service & Acceptable Use Policy available at rogers.com/terms.TMRogers & Mobius Design are trademarks of Rogers Communications Inc. used under license. All other brand names and logos are trademarks of their respective owners. © 2009 Rogers Wireless.

MO

ST P

OPU

LAR

BLACKBERRY

THIN

NEST BLACKBERRY CUR

VE

FIRST BLACKBERRY

FLIP

O N LY F O R A L I M I T E D T I M ETXT, EMAIL & IMUNLIMITEDNOW GET

*

BLACKBERRY® CURVETM 8320 BLACKBERRY® PEARLTM FLIP 8220 BLACKBERRY® CURVETM 8900 $9999† $4999†$19999†

$54999 $39999$59999no term no termno term

ALL NEW

HOT SMARTPHONES FOR HOT, SMART PEOPLE.

EXCLUS IVELY FROM ROGERS

ALL NEWACKBERRY® PEARLTMLL FLIP 82

rogers.com/unlimited

CANADA’S MOST RELIABLE NETWORK;FEWEST DROPPED CALLS, CLEAREST RECEPTION

MONTREALCarrefour de la Pointe

Place BourassaGaleries d’AnjouPlace Versailles

5954 Metropolitan Blvd. E5110 Jean-Talon St. E4455 Saint-Denis St.

1 De Castelnau St. E, Suite 1013573 St-Laurent Blvd.

1008 Clark St., Suite 206BPlace Ville-Marie

2170 Pierre-Dupuy Ave.997 St-Antoine St. W

Centre Commercial Le Village2116 Guy St.

2360 Notre-Dame St. W, Suite 1021201 Greene Ave.Place Alexis-Nihon

5529 Monkland Ave.Centre Montpellier

9012 de l’Acadie Blvd.5150 Jean-Talon St. W

2100 Marcel-Laurin Blvd.Place Vertu

7020 Ch. de la Côte-de-Liesse3339L des Sources Blvd.

2814 St-Charles Blvd.14945 de Pierrefonds Blvd.950 St-Jean Blvd., Suite 3ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGUE

374 Larivière Ave., Rouyn-Noranda

Galeries Val d’Or252 1re Ave. W, Amos

BOUCHERVILLEPromenades Montarville

BROSSARDMail ChamplainPlace PortobelloQuartier DIX30

CARIGNAN2255 Chambly Rd.CHÂTEAUGUAY

129 St-Jean-Baptiste Blvd.DELSON

28D Marie-Victorin Blvd.DRUMMONDVILLE965 St-Joseph Blvd.

GATINEAU360 Maloney Blvd. W, Suite 1

GRANBY583 Boivin Blvd.

HULL442 St-Joseph Blvd.

ÎLE-PERROTCarrefour Don-Quichotte

JOLIETTE517 St. Charles-Borromée St. N

LAPRAIRIEPlace La Citière

LAVAL2142 des Laurentides Blvd.

Centre Laval1888 St-Martin Blvd. W

Centre Lépine241C Samson Blvd.

LONGUEUILPlace Désormeaux

1490 Ch. de Chambly, Suite 101MAGOG

221 Principale St. WMONT-TREMBLANT

507 De Saint-Jovite St.REPENTIGNY

494A Notre-Dame St.Les Galeries Rive-Nord

ROSEMÈREPlace Rosemère

135 Curé-Labelle Blvd.SAINT-CONSTANT

Méga-Centre St-ConstantSAINT-EUSTACHE

360E Arthur-Sauvé Blvd.SAINT-HUBERT

Complexe CousineauSAINT-HYACINTHE

Les Galeries St. HyacintheSAINT-JEAN-SUR-RICHELIEU

Les Halles St-JeanSAINT-JÉRÔME60 Bélanger St.

SALABERRY-DE-VALLEYFIELD3225 Mrg. Langlois Blvd.

SHERBROOKE2980 King St. W

Carrefour de l’EstrieTERREBONNE

1270 Moody Blvd., Suite 10TROIS-RIVIÈRES

5335 Des Forges Blvd. 5635 Jean-XXIII Blvd.

2 des Ormeaux St., Suite 600VAUDREUIL-DORION

64 Harwood Blvd., Suite 101

MONTREALCentre Rockland

Le Boulevard Shopping CentreComplexe Desjardins

Montreal Eaton Centre1015 Ste. Catherine

BEAUPORTProm. Beauport

BELOEILMail MontenachCHATEAUGUAY

Centre Regional ChateauguayCHICOUTIMI

Place du RoyaumeDRUMMONDVILLE

Les Prom. DrummondvilleGATINEAU

Prom. de L’OutaouaisGaleries de Hull

GRANBYLes Galeries de Granby

JOLIETTELes Galeries Joliette

LA SALLECarrefour Angrignon

LAVALCarrefour Laval

LONGUEUILPlace LongueuilPOINTE CLAIRE

Fairview Pointe ClaireSOREL-TRACY

Les Prom. de SorelST. BRUNO

Les Prom. St-BrunoST. FOY

Place LaurierST. JEAN

Carrefour RichelieuST. JEROME

Carrefour du NordTERREBONNE

Les Galeries TerrebonneTROIS RIVIERES

Les RivieresVALLEYFIELD

Centre Valleyfield