MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

download MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

of 23

Transcript of MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    1/23

    MBA 500 Managerial Economics

    1st Unit

    Case 11. Tickets were sold last year = $100 million $1 = 100 million.

    2. Price elasticity of demand is 0.4,

    So,P

    Q

    dP

    dQ4.0= = 0.4 100 million = 40,000,000

    i.e. Slope =000,000,40

    1=

    dQ

    dP

    Demand function: P = a bQ,

    When P = $1, Q = 100 million, b = 000,000,40

    1=

    dQ

    dP

    1 = a ( )000,000,100000,000,40

    1

    a = 3.5

    Demand function: P = 3.5 Q000,000,40

    1

    Demand Table:

    P $1 $1.1 $1.2 $1.3 $1.4 $1.5

    Q 100m 96m 92m 88m 84m 80m

    3. When both ends meet, total revenue = total cost,

    We know that:P

    dPP=0

    ,Q

    dQQ =0

    ,

    then0

    0

    P

    Q

    P

    dP

    Q

    dQ

    Ed

    == , 00

    4.0 PQ =

    100,000,000(1 +0

    P)(1 +0

    Q ) = 120,000,000

    => 100,000,000((1 +0

    P )(1 0.40

    P) = 120,000,000

    P. 1

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    2/23

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    3/23

    Case 2

    A.

    B

    B

    A

    A

    AB

    P

    dP

    Q

    dQ

    E =

    1667.02/)5565(

    6555

    2/)('

    '

    =

    +

    =

    +

    BB

    BB

    PP

    PP

    2222.0

    2/)000,10000,8(

    000,10000,8

    2/)('

    '

    =

    +

    =

    +

    AA

    AA

    QQ

    QQ

    3329.11667.0

    2222.0=

    =ABE

    B. Shoes produced by these two firms are substitutes because 0>ABE .

    C. They are close substitutes because )1(3329.1 >=ABE .

    D. If the Arc price elasticity of demand for As shoes is 2,

    The change rate of quantity = 2222.02/)000,8000,10(

    000,8000,10 =+

    =>2

    2/)60(

    60

    2222.0

    '

    '=

    +

    A

    A

    P

    P

    685.53' =AP

    The price should be set at $53.685.

    P. 3

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    4/23

    Case 3

    US British

    Export 1,000 computers 150 autosUS$3,000 each 10,000 each

    1. Original exchange rate: US$2/, or US$1 =0.5

    If dollars exchange value depreciates by 10%, i.e. US$1 =0.45 (= 0.5 x

    90%).

    2. The computer price in pound = 3,000 x0.45 =1,350

    P

    QE dd

    =%

    %

    %30%

    %10

    %3

    =

    =

    d

    d

    Q

    Q

    300,13.1000,1 ==dQ computers

    3. The auto price in US$ = 22.222,22$45.0

    1000,10 US=

    P

    QE dd

    =

    %

    %

    %22.22%

    %11.11

    %2

    =

    =

    d

    d

    Q

    Q

    117%)22.221(150 ==dQ autos

    4. After the dollars 10% depreciation,

    For US export revenue will increase and import spending will decreasebecause the US goods are cheaper but British goods are more expensive.

    For British it will be opposite, export revenue will decrease and import

    spending will increase, the reason is that US goods are cheaper, British is

    willing to spend more.

    P. 4

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    5/23

    2nd Unit

    Case 1

    a) From the graph, we can find out:

    Breakeven point: TR = TC (profit = 0), Output = 10,000, TR = $300,000

    The CVP graph already drew in the question.

    b) Complete the table below

    Total Sales Total Cost Average Cost Profit Function

    TR = 3Q TC = 100,000 +

    2Q

    AC =

    2

    000,100+Q

    = Q 100,000

    Let TR = a + bQ

    From the graph, it is obvious that a = 0.

    From the graph, when Q = 100, TR = 300, substitute into TR = a + bQ

    300 = 0 + 100b, => b = 3

    TR = 3Q

    Let TC = a + bQ

    From the graph, when Q = 0, TC = 100, so a = 100,000

    When Q = 100, TC = 300, substitute into TC = a + bQ

    300,000 = 100,000 + 100,000b, => b = 2

    TC = 100,000 + 2Q

    AC = TC Q = 21002100

    +=+

    QQ

    Q

    Profit = TR TC = 3Q (100,000 + 2Q) = Q 100,000

    c) Operating leverage = TFC/TVC

    Output 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 17,500

    Leverage 2 1 0.6667 0.5 0.4 0.3333 0.2857

    When output = 2,500, operating leverage = 2500,220

    000,100=

    P. 5

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    6/23

    When output = 5,000, operating leverage = 1000,520

    000,100=

    When output = 7,500, operating leverage = 6667.0500,720

    000,100=

    When output = 10,000, operating leverage = 5.0000,1020

    000,100=

    When output = 12,500, operating leverage = 4.0500,1220

    000,100=

    When output = 15,000, operating leverage = 3333.0000,1520

    000,100=

    When output = 17,500, operating leverage = 2857.0500,1720

    000,100=

    d) Let Q be the output, when profit = 60,000:

    60,000 = Q 100,000

    Q = 160,000

    Total sales = 3Q = 3 x 160,000 = $480,000

    P. 6

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    7/23

    Case 2

    TR function (TR) = Price (P) x Quantity (Q) = 2Q (P = $2 from the question

    provided).

    Cost function (TC) = Fixed cost + Variable cost = 20,000 + 1.5Q (from question

    provided).

    Average cost (AC) = Cost function Quantity =Q

    Q5.1000,20 +

    Profit function = TR TC = 2Q (20,000 + 1.5Q) = 0.5Q 20,000

    DOL =

    Q

    dQ

    d

    =Q

    dQ

    TFCAVCPQAVCPdQ ])(/[)(

    =dQ

    Q

    TFCAVCPQ

    AVCPdQ

    )(

    )(

    =TFCAVCPQ

    AVCPQ

    )(

    )(

    =

    +

    Q

    TFCTVCP

    AVCP

    =

    ACP

    AVCP

    =

    +

    Q

    Q5.1000,202

    5.12

    Figure out degree of operational leverage at each output

    Output 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

    Leverage 3 2 1.66 1.5

    P. 7

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    8/23

    For Company B

    TR function Cost

    function

    Average cost Profit

    function

    DOL

    2Q 40,000 +1.5Q Q

    Q2.1000,40+

    0.8Q 40,000 QQ /)000,402.1(2

    2.12+

    Output 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

    Leverage 6.15 2.66 2 1.73

    For Company C

    TR function Cost function Average cost Profit

    function

    DOL

    2Q 60,000 + Q

    Q

    Q+000,60 Q 60,000

    QQ /)000,60(2

    12

    +

    Output 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000

    Leverage 0 4 2.5 2

    Conclusion:

    Yes, the three conclusions are valid. It can be seen from Company C, it has the highest

    fixed costs and the lower rate of change in variable costs, so the breakeven point is

    higher than Company A and Company B. However, after the breakeven point, the

    increase in profit of Company C will also be higher than the other two companies.

    P. 8

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    9/23

    Case 3

    1) The isocost curve can be found from the graph in the question.

    K = 750 75 = 10

    S = 750 50 = 15

    2) Process 1 = 6 x 75 + 2 x 50 = 550

    Process 2 = 3 x 75 + 3 x 50 = 375

    Process 3 = 2 x 75 + 6 x 50 = 450

    So Mr Wang should use process 2 because it has lowest cost incurred.

    The maximum number of garments could dry = 100 garments. Mr Wang can

    incur expenses up to $750. For process 2, the cost is $375, so he can double thenumber of garments under process 2 ($750/$375 = 2), so the maximum number

    of garments being dried = 50 x 2 = 100.

    P. 9

    15

    10

    K

    S

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    10/23

    3) Complete the table below

    Process 1 Process 2 Process 3

    TC per day $750 $750 $750

    Labor hired 72.22550750 = 63

    375750 = 106

    450750 =

    Machine rented18.86

    550

    750= 63

    375

    750= 33.32

    450

    750=

    Garments dry

    cleaned18.6850

    550

    750= 10050

    375

    750= 33.8350

    450

    750=

    4) Process 1 = 6 x 62.5 + 2 x 62.5 = 500

    Process 2 = 3 x 62.5 + 3 x 62.5 = 375

    Process 3 = 2 x 62.5 + 6 x 62.5 = 500

    Again, Process 2 should be used due to its lowest cost among three processes.

    The maximum number of garments to be dry-clean still remains at 100. The

    calculation is same as part (2) above (50 x 2 = 100).

    5) The new isocost curve is as below:

    K = 750 62.5 = 12

    S = 750 62.5 = 12

    P. 10

    12

    12

    K

    S

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    11/23

    3rd Unit

    Case 1

    1. Let H be the output of heating oil and G be the output of gasoline.

    Target function (P) is to maximize the profit of the company.

    P: 20H + 30G

    Subject to:

    1H + 1G 10 (Labor constraint)

    0.5H + 1G 7 (Capital constraint)

    1/3H + 1G 6.5 (Crude oil constraint)

    H, G 0

    Answer 2, 3 and 4

    There are three combination to solve the H and G, also it can also be found the

    optimal point by graph.

    (a) Solve the equation of labor constraint and crude oil constraint:

    H + G = 10 (1)

    1/3H + G = 6.5 (2)

    (1) (2)

    2/3H = 3.5

    H = 5.25

    G = 10 5.25 = 4.75

    Profit = 20 x 5.25 + 30 x 4.75 = 247.5

    (b) Solve the equation of labor constraint and capital constraint:H + G = 10 (1)

    0.5H + G = 7 (2)

    (1) (2)

    0.5H = 3, H = 6

    G = 10 6 = 4

    Profit = 20 x 6 + 30 x 4 = 240

    P. 11

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    12/23

    (c) Solve the equation of capital constraint and crude oil constraint:

    0.5H + G = 7 (1)

    1/3H + G = 6.5 (2)

    (1) (2)

    0.1667H = 0.5, H = 3

    G = 7 0.5 x 3 = 5.5

    Profit = 20 x 3 + 30 x 5.5 = 225

    Therefore, the company should produce 5.25 barrel of heating oil and 4.75

    barrel of gasoline in order to maximize the profit.

    Of course, if the company must produce exact number of barrels, then the

    company should produce 6 barrel of heating oil and 4 barrel of gasoline, and the

    maximized profit is $240.

    P. 12

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    13/23

    P. 13

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    14/23

    4th Unit

    Case 1

    1.

    USA China

    $ Y $ Y

    Gun 20 1,000 16 800

    Butter 6.67 333.5 8 400

    2. According to the law of comparative advantages, USA should export butter

    because it has lower opportunity cost than China ($6.67 in USA < $8 in China),

    and China should export Gun with the same reason ($16 in China < $20 in

    USA).

    3. To reduce the US imports from China to zero, the production cost between the

    two countries should be the same.

    Let y be the new exchange rate

    20y = 1,600 2

    y = 40

    So, the US$ should be depreciated by (40 50)/50 x 100% = 20%

    4. Same principle as part (3).

    Let X be the new wage rate

    50X = 1,600 2

    X = 16

    So, the wage rate should reduced by 20% [(16 20) / 20 = -20%], and the newproductivity of US labor should be $20/$16 = 1.25 gun per unit of labor, i.e. the

    productivity increases by (1.25 1)/1 x 100% = 25%

    5. If the products are homogenous, the price between two countries will finally be

    the same by exchange rate movement or the domestic wage rate.

    P. 14

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    15/23

    Case 2

    1. 1st demand curve less elastic, observed from the slope of demand curve. (In

    fact, not really understand what the question asks.)

    2. 2nd demand curve more elastic.

    3. and 4.

    Solve the following two equations of 1st demand curve and 2nd demand curve.

    P1 = 7 0.025Q1 (1)

    P2 = 10 0.1Q2 (2)

    If two demand curves cross each other, P1 = P2 and Q1 = Q2

    (2) (1)

    0 = 3 0.075Q

    Q = 40

    P = 7 0.025 x 40 = 6

    So, quantity is 40 and price is 6.

    5. Upper limit: MR1 = 7 0.05 x 40 = 5

    Lower limit: MR2 = 10 0.2 x 40 = 2

    6. Yes, MC fall into the MR gap.

    TC = 2Q + 0.025Q2

    By differentiation: MCdQ

    dTC=

    MC = 2 + 0.05Q

    MC = 2 + 0.05 x 40 = 4, it is between 2 and 5, so MC falls into MR gap.

    7. It implies that price is stable because they are not willing to change price. This

    often finds in oligopolistic markets

    P. 15

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    16/23

    Case 3

    1. From the information of the question, the satisfaction can be quantified, so:

    A = 20

    B = 5

    D = 0

    2. Cost of sufficient preparation = 10

    Cost of insufficient preparation = 6

    The answers for 3, 4, 6, and 7 (5 is missing from the question) can be shown in the

    following payoff matrix.

    Bob

    Time (Cost = 10) Time (Cost = 6)

    Others Time (Cost = 10) B(-5), B(-5) A(14), D(-6)

    Time (Cost = 6) D(-6), A(14) B(-1), B(-1)

    For top right cell, the Bob and others spend same effort, so all can get B grade, and

    the payoff is satisfaction less cost, i.e.5 10 = 5.

    Same principle applies to other three cells. For example, at the bottom left cell, Bob

    spends sufficient time but others not, so others only get D grade but Bob can get A

    grade. The payoff of others = 0 6 = 6 and the payoff of Bob = 20 6 = 14

    It has dominant strategy at the top left cell, i.e. B(-5), B(-5).

    8. The cooperation is difficult to achieve because others will think that if Bob

    really spends less time, they will get A grade if they spend much time instudying. At the same time, Bob will worry about others if they study hard, so

    for safety, Bob will study hard too.

    9. It clearly illustrates Nash equilibrium.

    P. 16

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    17/23

    5th Unit

    Case 1

    1.

    2. Before tax:

    P = 1,400 0.2Qd

    P = 200 + 0.1 Qs

    P* = 600, Q* = 4,000

    After tax:

    P = 1,400 0.2Qd

    P = 200 + 0.1 Qs + 0.1 = 200.1 + 0.1 Qs

    P* = 600.07, Q* = 3,999.7

    3. From part (1) and (2), we solve thatEquilibrium output = 3,999.7

    Equilibrium price = $600.07

    4.

    Total consumer spending = 600.07 x 3,999.7 = 2,400,099.98

    Price charged after tax = 600.07

    The total net sales = 599.97 x 3,999.7 = 2,399,700

    Total taxes paid or charged = 0.1 x 3,999.97 = 399.97

    P. 17

    0.1

    A

    A

    D

    S

    S

    600.07

    600

    599.97

    4,0003,999.7Q

    P

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    18/23

    = (600.07 600) x 3,999.7 = 279.979

    = (0.1 0.07) x 3,999.7 = 119.99

    5. True cost of this tax for the society= 0.1 x (4,000 3,999.7) 2 = 0.015

    P. 18

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    19/23

    Case 2

    Items Home Foreign

    1. Demand D = 100 20P,P = 5 0.05D

    D* = 80 20P,P = 4 0.05D

    2. Supply S = 20 + 20P,

    P = -1 + 0.05S

    S* = 40 + 20P,

    P = -2 + 0.05S*

    3 Equilibrium price before trade 2 1

    4 Equilibrium quantity before trade 60 60

    5 Import or export function I E

    6 Consumer surplus before trade 90 90

    7 Producer surplus before trade 90 90

    8 Total surplus before trade 180 180

    9 Price per trade 1.5 1.5

    10 Import or export volume 10 10

    11 Consumer surplus after trade 122.5 62.5

    12 Producer surplus after trade 87.5 87.5

    13 Total surplus after trade 210 150

    14 Price when $0.5 tariff is levied 1.75 1.25

    15 Trade volume when $0.5 tariff is

    levied 10 10

    16 Consumption after tariff 65 55

    17 Domestic production after tariff 55 65

    18 Consumer surplus after tariff 105.625 75.625

    19 Producer surplus after tariff 89.375 89.375

    20 Tariff revenue 10 x 0.5 = 5 10 x 0.25 = 2.5

    21 Tariff burden +0.25 -0.25

    22 Total surplus after tariff 195 165

    Item 3

    Home: 100 20P = 20 + 20P, P = 2

    Foreign: 80 20P = 40 + 20P, P = 1

    Item 4

    Home: 5 0.05Q = -1 + 0.05Q, Q = 60

    Foreign: 4 0.05Q = -2 + 0.05Q, Q = 60

    P. 19

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    20/23

    Item 6 From the graph at the end

    Home: Area of triangle = [60 x (5 2) 2] = 90

    Foreign: Area of triangle = [60 x (4 1) 2] = 90

    Item 7 From the graph

    Home: Producer surplus = [60 x (2 + 1) 2] = 90

    Foreign: Producer surplus = [60 x (1 + 2) 2] = 90

    Item 8 = Item 6 + Item 7

    Home: Total surplus before trade = 90 + 90 = 180

    Foreign: Total surplus before trade = 90 + 90 = 180

    Item 9

    D = 100 20P

    S = 40 + 20P

    In equilibrium, D = S, then solve the above equation:

    100 40 = 20P + 20P

    40P = 60

    P = 1.5

    Item 10

    From the graph, after trade at price = 1.5:

    Home import = 60 (home demand) 50 (home supply) = 10 units

    Foreign export = home import = 10 units

    Item 11

    Home = [70 x (5 1.5) 2] = 122.5Foreign = [50 x (4 1.5) 2] = 62.5

    Item 12

    Home = [70 x (1.5 + 1) 2] = 87.5

    Foreign = Same as Home = 87.5

    Item 13 = Item 11 + Item 12

    Home = 122.5 + 87.5 = 210

    Foreign = 62.5 + 87.5 = 150

    P. 20

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    21/23

    Item 14

    From the graph, Home = 1.75 and Foreign = 1.25.

    Item 15

    From graph, it can be found the trade volume of Home and Foreign is 10.

    Item 16

    From graph, it can be found that consumption after tariff:

    Home = 65

    Foreign = 55

    Item 17

    From graph, it can be found that domestic production after tariff:

    Home = 55

    Foreign = 65

    Item 18

    Consumer surplus after tariff (from graph):

    Home (area of triangle) = [(5 1.75) x 65 2] = 105.625

    Foreign = [(4 1.25) x 55 2] = 75.625

    Item 19

    Producer surplus after tariff (from graph):

    Home = [(1.75 + 1) x 65 2] = 89.375

    Foreign = [(1.25 + 2) x 55 2] = 89.375

    Item 22 = Item 18 + Item 19

    Home = 105.625 + 89.375 = 195Foreign = 75.625 + 89.375 = 165

    P. 21

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    22/23

    P. 22

  • 7/30/2019 MBA 500 Managerial Economics-Assignment

    23/23

    P. 23