Mathematics Improving Mineral Processing Efficiency...• Extremely flexible tools for developing...
Transcript of Mathematics Improving Mineral Processing Efficiency...• Extremely flexible tools for developing...
1 |
CSIRO MINERAL RESOURCES FLAGSHIP
Iztok Livk MATLAB Tour, Perth, 12 August 2014
Mathematics Improving Mineral Processing Efficiency
2 |
Australian Minerals Research Centre
Perth (Waterford)
3 |
DIGITAL PRODUCTIVITY & SERVICES
ENERGY
BIOSECURITY
CSIRO Research Flagships
OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE
FOOD, HEALTH & BIO-PRODUCTS
AGRICULTURE MINERAL RESOURCES
FUTURE MANUFACTURING
LAND & WATER
4 |
Presentation Outline
1. Modelling and Simulation of a
Gibbsite Crystallisation Circuit
2. A New Technique for Quantifying
Particle Breakage Behaviour
5 |
Australian Alumina Production
6 |
Gibbsite Crystallisation - defining the product
• Generating solids from clear solution
• Process productivity
• Product quality, chemical purity
Gibbsite Crystallisers
7 |
A Simplified Gibbsite Crystallisation Circuit
Gibbsite Crystals
Fine
See
d
Coa
rse
See
d
8 |
Gibbsite Crystallisation in the Plant
9 |
Modelling the Crystallisation Process
mm(a)
Agglomeration Crystal Growth
Nucleation
10 |
A Single Crystalliser Model - standalone
11 |
Gibbsite Crystallisation Circuit - SIMULINK
12 |
Alumina and Solids Concentrations across the Circuit
Yield= 90.27 g/L
Alumina concentration Solids concentration
13 |
PSDs in Different Streams
S
14 |
Dynamic response of the crystallisation circuit
Increased Fines Generation
14
15 |
Last Crystalliser Dynamic Response
Alumina concentration: Last Crystalliser
0 10 20 30 40 50 60560
580
600
620
640
660
10th
tank
sol
ids
conc
entra
tion,
g/L
Time, day
NormalIncreased Nucleation
Solids concentration: Last Crystalliser
0 10 20 30 40 50 6068.5
69
69.5
70
10th
tank
Al 2O
3 con
cent
ratio
n , g
/L
Time, day
NormalIncreased Nucleation
16 |
Seed Recycle Dynamic Response
Fine Seed Coarse Seed
0 10 20 30 40 50 602.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
Fine
See
d ra
te, k
g/s
Time, day
NormalIncreased Nucleation
0 10 20 30 40 50 6060
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
Coar
se S
eed
rate
, kg/
s
Time, day
NormalIncreased Nucleation
17 |
Production Rate Dynamic Response
Leads to severe
plant instabilities –
model based
compensation
required
0 10 20 30 40 50 6017.2
17.4
17.6
17.8
18
18.2
Pro
duct
rate
, kg/
s
Time, day
NormalIncreased Nucleation
18 |
Alumina Calcination
19 |
Alumina Particles - agglomerates (a) (b)
• What is the strength of these particles? • How do they break? • What effect does the production process have on their breakage?
20 |
Quantifying Particle Strength and Breakage Mechanism
jS
Breakage
Parent Daughters
21 |
Population Balance Breakage Model Data
Parent Size, l
Dau
ghte
r Siz
e, v
Toughness, t
• One cube of data for each time instant (4-D double)
22 |
Breakage Mechanism Identification Software
23 |
Calcined Particle Breakage - animation
24 |
Breakage Maps - animation
25 |
Breakage Map of Sample A - cleavage
26 |
Breakage Map of Sample B - attrition
27 |
Conclusions
• Extremely flexible tools for developing customised applications
• Deployment of developed applications using standalone or
dynamically linked libraries
• Developments used to facilitating improvements in multi-billion
dollar minerals processing industries
• Allowing for further integration of developed applications, e.g.
process optimisation and control
• MathWorks tools used in the examples presented: èMATLAB èMATLAB Compiler èOptimisation Toolbox è SIMULINK
28 |
Acknowledgement Andrey Bekker, CSIRO Neil Francis, CSIRO
29 |
CSIRO Mineral Resources Flagship Iztok Livk t +61 8 9334 8902 e [email protected] w www.csiro.au/MDU
Thank you