MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE โฆ...MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT...
Transcript of MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE โฆ...MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT...
Antarctica J Math 11(3)(2014) 265-277
wwwdomainsmooncom
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE
BY PLANT ROOT IN SATURATED AND
UNSATURATED ZONE
P S AVHALE [Email avhalepsyahoocom]
Department of Mathematics Shivaji Arts and Science College Kannad Aurangabad
[District] Maharastra India
amp
S B KIWNE Department of Mathematics Deogiri College Aurangabad Maharastra India
(Received on 18th
August 2014)
The root system of the plants uptake the water and nutrients from the soil The
present paper explains systematic description of root functioning for water uptake
from the saturated and unsaturated soil and transport through the stem to the leaves
We use basic principles of physics and fluid-dynamics tiny xylems tubes as water
transport channel in the stem and develop simple mathematical model for water
transport In this paper we write mathematical model for water profile at root
surface at the xylem and leaves We solve the mathematical model using root surface
boundary conditions by analytical method
1 INTRODUCTION
The primary physiological function of root is up taking the water as well as
nutrients and transport to leaves for photosynthesis Investigations and observation of
the uptake of water and nutrient in plant root and stem can be traced back to many
years ago it possesses importance in point of view of agricultural production and
economical development In traditional farming like planting and agricultural the -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject classification (AMS) 35XX-35K xx 76XX-76Rxx 76XX-7605 76XX-76Zxx-
76Z05 and 92XX-92B 265
266 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
Key words amp PhrasesPlant root Root water uptake Poiseuille flow Mathematical modelXX
mechanism of water and nutrients is invaluable for utilizing water and fertilizer for
increasing production Now a new trend of planting inedible plant emerges on
industrial basis The view of planting inedible plant are prevent the salinization
desertification of soil to clean pollution of heavy metals radioelement and plants
mining To collect the valuable metals like gold in soil by planting some plants
whose roots possess a special capability of absorbing the valuable metals The plants
of genus Bauhina have many species out of which Bauhinia variegata plant extract is
analyzed and found it contain micro-particles of gold [1] Since ancient times
Bauhinia racemosa Lam family Caesalpinaceae has been an integral part of life in
India Leaves of Bauhinia racemosa are traditionally used on occasion of Dashera
festival as symbol of gold in India [2] Recently proved that Bauhina racemosa extract
also contain micro particles of gold Water enters into root through root surface from
the soil Then it flow through micro-tube of xylem in the stem to rich leaves and being
vaporized into air from the pores on leaves The transport of water in plant can affect
the water flow in soil and vice versa Then study of Mathematical model for plant
water uptake divides into the parts (1) the flow of water in the porous soil (2) water
flow into root through root surface (3) flow of water through micro-tube of xylem
(4) vaporization of water through leaves In recent years a number of researchers
from various fields such as physics applied mathematics and plant physiology paid
more attention to develop mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake The
outstanding work in this field is done by T Roose and proposed a mathematical
model for uptake of water and nutrient Roose work is development of Nye Tinker
and Barber model for water and nutrient uptake assuming that the root is an infinitely
long cylinder [7][15] Before this model many root water uptake model like a linear
root water uptake model (Prasad Rama 1988) [3] CERES (Ritche 1985) [4] and
SWAP (Van Dam et al 1997) [5] was developed
2 FLOW OF WATER IN POROUS MEDIUM
In 1856 Henry Darcy make experiment and concluded that rate of flow ( i e
volume of water per unit time) 119876 is (a) proportional to the cross-sectional area 119860 (b)
proportional to (1198931 minus 1198932) the lengths 1198931 and 1198932are measured with respect to some
arbitrary datum level (c) inversely proportional to the length 119871 [6]
119876 = 119870119860(1198931minus1198932)
119871 (2 1)
where 119870 is a coefficient of proportionality which is known as soil hydraulic
conductivity Equation (2 1) is known as Darcy formula Specific discharge 119958 as the
volume of water owing per unit time through a unit cross-sectional area normal to the
direction of flow i e 119958 =119928
119912 we obtain
119958 = 119870119869 (2 2)
where 119869 = (1198931minus1198932)
119871 is in one dimension In three dimension the generalization
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 267 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
of equation (2 2) is given by
119958 = 119870119869 = minus 1048576119870119892119903119886119899119889 = 1048576minus nablaempty 2 3
The average areal porosity is equal to the volumetric porosity 119899 the portion of
the area 119860 available to flow is 119899119860 The average velocity 119881 of flow is given by
119881 =119876
119899119860=
119958
119899 (2 4)
Another form of Darcy formula is in term of specific discharge i e Darcy flux is
written as
119958 = minus119948
120641 119892119903119886119899119889 119901 minus 120588119892 (2 5)
where =119896120588119892
120583 120583 is dynamic viscosity of fluid 120588 =
120574
119892 is the density of the fluid k is the
mediums permeability and 119944 = minus119944119949119963 is the vector gravity acceleration directed
downward If fluid is not compressible then nabla119906 = 0 The equation for the
conservation of water in the soil with no water sink is given by [7]
120597empty119897
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = 0 (2 6)
where 119958 is given by
119958 = minus119948
120641 nabla119901 minus 120588119892119896 (2 7)
The 119896 soil permeability is just differ from hydraulic conductivity K by scaling
factor which is given by
119870 =119896119901119892
120583 (2 8)
where 120588119892 present the density of water and gravity If soil is saturated then we have
120588119892119896 = 0 therefore the Darcy flux is given by = minus119948
120641[nablap] However the
conductivity of unsaturated soil is determined from experiments in terms of effective
water saturation where effective water saturation 119878 is defined as
119878 = empty119897 minus empty119897 119903
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 (2 9)
where empty119897 is the moisture content of the soil empty119897 119903 is the residual (minimum) moisture
content of the soil and empty119897 119904 is the saturated moisture content of the soil i e the soil
268 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
porosity Van Genuchten drive a formula for the soil hydraulic conductivity as a
function of soil moisture content and porosity which is given by [14]
119870 = 11987011990411987812[1 1048576minus (1 1048576minus 119878119898 )119898 ]2 119891119900119903 0 lt 119898 lt 1 (2 10)
where 119870119904 is the hydraulic conductivity of fully saturated soil In addition to deriving
the soil hydraulic conductivity formula (2 10) he also presents a formula for the
suction characteristic He uses the pressure head 119893 suction minus119901 gt 0 can be written in
terms of pressure head i e minus119901 = minus120588119892119893 Hence we have
= [1
1 + 120572119893 119899 ]119898 =
1
1 + 120572120588119892
minus119901 119899
119898
119898 = 1 minus1
119899 0 lt 119898 lt 1 (2 11)
where 119870119904 is a fitting parameter that can be inversely linked to the bubbling pressure
We write equation (2 6) of conservation of water in the soil in terms of relative
moisture content S using the full van Genuchten formulas and then we get the
following nonlinear diffusion-convection equation
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905= nabla 119863 119878 nabla119878 minus
120588119892
120583
119889119896
119889119878
120597119878
120597119911 2 12
where D(S) is called the soil water diffusivity and it is defined as
119863 119878 =119896 119878
120583 120597119901
120597119878
=119896119904120588119892
120583
times 1 minus 119898
prop 11989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 (2 13)
and
119889119896(119878)
119889119878= 119896119904
1
2119878minus
12 1 minus 1 minus 119878
1119898
119898
2
+ 2119878 minus12
+1119898
1 minus 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus1
(2 14)
RANGE OF VALIDITY
In the flow through conduits the Reynolds number 119877119890 which is
dimensionless number expressing the ratio of inertial to viscous forces acting on the
fluid is used as a criterion to distinguish between laminar flow occurring at low
velocities and turbulent flow occurring at higher velocities By analogy a Reynolds
number is defined also for flow through porous media [6]
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 269 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119877119890 =119958119889
119907 (2 15)
where 119889 is some representative length of the porous matrix and 119907 is the kinematic
viscosity of the fluid Practically all evidence indicates that Darcys law is valid as
long as the Reynolds number does not exceed some value between 1 and 10 There
the equation (2 12) valued as long as Darcys law obeys i e for Reynolds number
value less than flow will be at very low pressure gradients through low-permeability
sediments also for Reynolds number value greater than 10 there will be large flows
through high permeability gradients
3 WATER FLOW THROUGH ROOT SURFACE INSIDE THE
ROOT
Water flow through root surface then there will be change in water pressure
which serves as boundary condition in equation of water conservation in the root The
root surface membrane work as semi permeable membrane represents the water
movement path across the cortex to the xylem The rate of water uptake by pant roots
per unit surface area 119869119908[1198881198983119888119898minus210485761199041048576minus1] is given by [7][11]
119869119908 = 119896119903 nabla119875 minus 120589ฮprod (3 1)
where 119896119903 is the speed of water flow through the root surface membrane per unit
difference in water pressure on either side of the membrane nabla119875 is the hydraulic water
pressure across the membrane 120589 is the reflection which give relation between osmotic
pressure to hydrostatic and ฮprod is the osmotic pressure difference across the
membrane Neglecting the osmotic pressure effects on water uptake by plant roots and
119863 is the water diffusivity in cortical tissues then for a root surface membrane with the
inner boundary at 119886119909 and an outer boundary at the root surface 119886 the water pressure
distribution inside this membrane is given by a solution to the equation
120597119901119898
120597119905=
119863
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 2)
with boundary conditions given for example by 119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 119886 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at
119903 = 119886119909 where 119901119898 is the water pressure in the root cortex tissues 119901 is the water
pressure at the root surface and 119901119903 is the water pressure in the xylem Non-
dimensionalising the above equation with typical timescale [119905] and root radius a we
find that the dimensionless problem becomes
1198862
119863 119905
120597119901119898
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 3)
With
119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 1 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at 119903 = 119886119909119886 = 119903119909 (3 4)
270 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
For small order radius water pressure distribution profile is at pseudo steady
state i e the time derivative term in the equation (3 3) is small and the steady state
solution is given by [8]
119901119898 =119901 minus 119901119903
minus119897119899 119903119909 119897119899 119903 + 119901 (3 5)
asymp119901 minus 119901119903
1 minus 119903119909 119903 minus 1 + 119901 119891119900119903 119903119909 lt 119903 lt 1
Hence in dimensional terms the ux of water through the unit of root surface
area is given approximately by
119863120597119901119898
120597119903|119903=119886 =
119863
119886minus119886119909 119901 minus 119901119903 (3 6)
where 119896119903 =119863
119886minus119886119909 is generally known as a root surface membrane hydraulic
conductivity Using boundary condition equation (3 6) at the root surface we can be
written as
119896 119878
120583
120597119901
120597119903= 119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (3 7)
where 119896(119878) is the soil water permeability 119896119903 is the radial conductivity of root surface
membrane 119901 is the water pressure in the soil 119901119909 is the water pressure in the root
xylem and 119886 is the radius of the root
4 WATER FLOW IN THE XYLEM LONGITUDINALLY UP-
WARDS INTERIOR OF ROOT
Interior parts of root are made of macro tubes of xylem with average radius
119903119898 Assume that the number of the micro-tubes is N The total area cross-section of
the micro tubes can be written as 119873empty1199031198982 = empty1198772 We assume that the water path
effectively by a single tiny circular tube with the radius 119877 Water motion in the
interior of root is described by one dimensional Poiseuille flow along the pipe with
variable cross section area of radius r [7][9]
120583nabla2119906 = nabla119901 minus 120588119892119948 (4 1)
where 119906 is water velocity profile with non-slip boundary condition which is given by
119906 119903 119911 =1199032minus1198772
4120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 2)
The total flux of water passing upwards through the cross section at the level 119911
is given by
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 271 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119902 = minusempty1198774
8120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 3)
let 119896119909 =empty1198774
8120583 then equation (4 3) becomes
119902 = minus119896119909 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 4)
5 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE THE
ROOT
We consider a unit length of the root and assume that there is balance between
water flow through the root surface membrane and upward in the xylem tubes Then
mass conservation law yields [7][9][16]
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 =120597119902
120597119911 (5 1)
where 119886 is the radius of the root and 119902 is the longitudinal flux of water Substituting
the value of (4 4) in equation (5 1) then we get an ordinary differential equation for
119901119903 as a function of 119911 i e
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (5 2)
which we can solve subject to boundary conditions
119901119903 = 119879 119886119905 119911 = 0 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 119871 (5 3)
where 119879 is the average pressure at the top of the root i e at the root-shoot boundary
and L is the length of the root
6 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE OF THE
ROOT AT CONSTANT SOIL PRESSURE
Suppose the root surrounded by water in porous medium are at constant
pressure i e 119901 = 119875 then water pressure equation in the root system is
2120587119886119896119903 119875 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 1)
Non-dimensionalise the equation (6 1) with
119911 = 119871119911lowast and 119901119903 = 119879119901119903lowast (6 2)
272 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
where 119911lowast and 119901119903lowast are the dimensionless length and pressure respectively The
dimensionless equation (6 2) becomes with dropping lowast becomes
1198962 1198750 minus 119901119903 = minus1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 3)
with dimensionless boundary condition (5 3) becomes
119901119903 = 1 at 119911 = 119900 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 1 (6 4)
where 1198750 =119875
119879 and 1198962 =
21205871198861198961199031198712
119896119909 are the dimensionless water uptake coefficients
Solution of equation (6 3) with boundary conditions (6 4) is given by
119901119903 = 1198750 +1
2 1198750 minus 1 119905119886119899119893 119896 minus 1198750+ + 1 119890119896119911 +
1
2 minus 1198750 minus 1 tan 119893 119896 minus 1198750 +
1 119890=119896119911 (6 5)
7 MODEL FOR WATER FLOW IN THE SOIL WITH ROOT
SURFACE BOUNDARY CONDITION SUBJECTED TO
CONSTANT ROOT INTERNAL PRESSURE
Water flow in soil given by equation (2 12) can be write in radial co-ordinates
form with boundary condition (3 7) is given by [10]
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 1)
with boundary condition
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (7 2)
where 119875 119903 is the constant pressure inside the root and
119863 119878 =119896119904120588119892
120583times
1 minus 119898
12057211989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 7 3
119901 119878 = minus120588119892
120572 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1119899 7 4
We non-dimensionalise this model with choice of time radius and pressure in
new scales as follows
119905 = 119905 119905lowast = empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 1205721198981198862120583
1 minus 119898 119896119904120588119892119905lowast 119903 = 119886119903lowast 120583 =
120588119892
120572119901lowast (7 5)
and the dimensionless model with boundary condition becomes by dropping
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 273 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 6)
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 120582119908 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 1 (7 7)
where
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 119901 119878 = minus 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1119899
(7 8)
and dimensionless parameters are
120582119908 =119896119903120588119892119898119886
1 minus 119898 119870119904 119908119894119905119893 119870119904 =
119896119904120588119892
120583 119886119899119889 119901119903 =
119875119903120572
120588119892 (7 9)
Equation (7 1) can also written in term of relative water saturation in the soil
[12] The equation for conservation of water in the soil is thus
120593120597119878
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = minus119865119960 (7 10)
where empty is the (constant) porosity of the soil 119878 is the relative water saturation in the
soil i e 119878 = empty119897empty where empty119897 is the volumetric water fraction 119958 is the volume flux of
water i e Darcy flux and 119865119908 is the uptake of water by plant roots Consider value of
u given in equation (2 7) with equation (2 10) Also the water pressure in the soil
pores can be linked to the relative water saturation via suction characteristic [14]
119901119886 minus 119901 = 119901119888119891 119878 119891 119878 = 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1minus119898
(7 11)
where 119901119886 is atmospheric pressure and 119901119888 is a characteristic suction pressure It is
common to take 119901119886 = 0
Then the Darcy-Richards equation in terms of relative water saturation only it
is written as
empty120597119878
120597119905= nabla 1198630119863 119878 nabla119878 minus 119870119904119870 119878 119948 minus 119865119960 (7 12)
where the water diffusivity in the soil is 1198630119863 119878 =119896
120583
120597119901
120597119878 1198630 =
119901119888119896119904
120583
1minus119898
119898 and
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 (7 13)
Also equation (2 8) can written as follows
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
266 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
Key words amp PhrasesPlant root Root water uptake Poiseuille flow Mathematical modelXX
mechanism of water and nutrients is invaluable for utilizing water and fertilizer for
increasing production Now a new trend of planting inedible plant emerges on
industrial basis The view of planting inedible plant are prevent the salinization
desertification of soil to clean pollution of heavy metals radioelement and plants
mining To collect the valuable metals like gold in soil by planting some plants
whose roots possess a special capability of absorbing the valuable metals The plants
of genus Bauhina have many species out of which Bauhinia variegata plant extract is
analyzed and found it contain micro-particles of gold [1] Since ancient times
Bauhinia racemosa Lam family Caesalpinaceae has been an integral part of life in
India Leaves of Bauhinia racemosa are traditionally used on occasion of Dashera
festival as symbol of gold in India [2] Recently proved that Bauhina racemosa extract
also contain micro particles of gold Water enters into root through root surface from
the soil Then it flow through micro-tube of xylem in the stem to rich leaves and being
vaporized into air from the pores on leaves The transport of water in plant can affect
the water flow in soil and vice versa Then study of Mathematical model for plant
water uptake divides into the parts (1) the flow of water in the porous soil (2) water
flow into root through root surface (3) flow of water through micro-tube of xylem
(4) vaporization of water through leaves In recent years a number of researchers
from various fields such as physics applied mathematics and plant physiology paid
more attention to develop mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake The
outstanding work in this field is done by T Roose and proposed a mathematical
model for uptake of water and nutrient Roose work is development of Nye Tinker
and Barber model for water and nutrient uptake assuming that the root is an infinitely
long cylinder [7][15] Before this model many root water uptake model like a linear
root water uptake model (Prasad Rama 1988) [3] CERES (Ritche 1985) [4] and
SWAP (Van Dam et al 1997) [5] was developed
2 FLOW OF WATER IN POROUS MEDIUM
In 1856 Henry Darcy make experiment and concluded that rate of flow ( i e
volume of water per unit time) 119876 is (a) proportional to the cross-sectional area 119860 (b)
proportional to (1198931 minus 1198932) the lengths 1198931 and 1198932are measured with respect to some
arbitrary datum level (c) inversely proportional to the length 119871 [6]
119876 = 119870119860(1198931minus1198932)
119871 (2 1)
where 119870 is a coefficient of proportionality which is known as soil hydraulic
conductivity Equation (2 1) is known as Darcy formula Specific discharge 119958 as the
volume of water owing per unit time through a unit cross-sectional area normal to the
direction of flow i e 119958 =119928
119912 we obtain
119958 = 119870119869 (2 2)
where 119869 = (1198931minus1198932)
119871 is in one dimension In three dimension the generalization
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 267 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
of equation (2 2) is given by
119958 = 119870119869 = minus 1048576119870119892119903119886119899119889 = 1048576minus nablaempty 2 3
The average areal porosity is equal to the volumetric porosity 119899 the portion of
the area 119860 available to flow is 119899119860 The average velocity 119881 of flow is given by
119881 =119876
119899119860=
119958
119899 (2 4)
Another form of Darcy formula is in term of specific discharge i e Darcy flux is
written as
119958 = minus119948
120641 119892119903119886119899119889 119901 minus 120588119892 (2 5)
where =119896120588119892
120583 120583 is dynamic viscosity of fluid 120588 =
120574
119892 is the density of the fluid k is the
mediums permeability and 119944 = minus119944119949119963 is the vector gravity acceleration directed
downward If fluid is not compressible then nabla119906 = 0 The equation for the
conservation of water in the soil with no water sink is given by [7]
120597empty119897
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = 0 (2 6)
where 119958 is given by
119958 = minus119948
120641 nabla119901 minus 120588119892119896 (2 7)
The 119896 soil permeability is just differ from hydraulic conductivity K by scaling
factor which is given by
119870 =119896119901119892
120583 (2 8)
where 120588119892 present the density of water and gravity If soil is saturated then we have
120588119892119896 = 0 therefore the Darcy flux is given by = minus119948
120641[nablap] However the
conductivity of unsaturated soil is determined from experiments in terms of effective
water saturation where effective water saturation 119878 is defined as
119878 = empty119897 minus empty119897 119903
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 (2 9)
where empty119897 is the moisture content of the soil empty119897 119903 is the residual (minimum) moisture
content of the soil and empty119897 119904 is the saturated moisture content of the soil i e the soil
268 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
porosity Van Genuchten drive a formula for the soil hydraulic conductivity as a
function of soil moisture content and porosity which is given by [14]
119870 = 11987011990411987812[1 1048576minus (1 1048576minus 119878119898 )119898 ]2 119891119900119903 0 lt 119898 lt 1 (2 10)
where 119870119904 is the hydraulic conductivity of fully saturated soil In addition to deriving
the soil hydraulic conductivity formula (2 10) he also presents a formula for the
suction characteristic He uses the pressure head 119893 suction minus119901 gt 0 can be written in
terms of pressure head i e minus119901 = minus120588119892119893 Hence we have
= [1
1 + 120572119893 119899 ]119898 =
1
1 + 120572120588119892
minus119901 119899
119898
119898 = 1 minus1
119899 0 lt 119898 lt 1 (2 11)
where 119870119904 is a fitting parameter that can be inversely linked to the bubbling pressure
We write equation (2 6) of conservation of water in the soil in terms of relative
moisture content S using the full van Genuchten formulas and then we get the
following nonlinear diffusion-convection equation
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905= nabla 119863 119878 nabla119878 minus
120588119892
120583
119889119896
119889119878
120597119878
120597119911 2 12
where D(S) is called the soil water diffusivity and it is defined as
119863 119878 =119896 119878
120583 120597119901
120597119878
=119896119904120588119892
120583
times 1 minus 119898
prop 11989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 (2 13)
and
119889119896(119878)
119889119878= 119896119904
1
2119878minus
12 1 minus 1 minus 119878
1119898
119898
2
+ 2119878 minus12
+1119898
1 minus 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus1
(2 14)
RANGE OF VALIDITY
In the flow through conduits the Reynolds number 119877119890 which is
dimensionless number expressing the ratio of inertial to viscous forces acting on the
fluid is used as a criterion to distinguish between laminar flow occurring at low
velocities and turbulent flow occurring at higher velocities By analogy a Reynolds
number is defined also for flow through porous media [6]
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 269 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119877119890 =119958119889
119907 (2 15)
where 119889 is some representative length of the porous matrix and 119907 is the kinematic
viscosity of the fluid Practically all evidence indicates that Darcys law is valid as
long as the Reynolds number does not exceed some value between 1 and 10 There
the equation (2 12) valued as long as Darcys law obeys i e for Reynolds number
value less than flow will be at very low pressure gradients through low-permeability
sediments also for Reynolds number value greater than 10 there will be large flows
through high permeability gradients
3 WATER FLOW THROUGH ROOT SURFACE INSIDE THE
ROOT
Water flow through root surface then there will be change in water pressure
which serves as boundary condition in equation of water conservation in the root The
root surface membrane work as semi permeable membrane represents the water
movement path across the cortex to the xylem The rate of water uptake by pant roots
per unit surface area 119869119908[1198881198983119888119898minus210485761199041048576minus1] is given by [7][11]
119869119908 = 119896119903 nabla119875 minus 120589ฮprod (3 1)
where 119896119903 is the speed of water flow through the root surface membrane per unit
difference in water pressure on either side of the membrane nabla119875 is the hydraulic water
pressure across the membrane 120589 is the reflection which give relation between osmotic
pressure to hydrostatic and ฮprod is the osmotic pressure difference across the
membrane Neglecting the osmotic pressure effects on water uptake by plant roots and
119863 is the water diffusivity in cortical tissues then for a root surface membrane with the
inner boundary at 119886119909 and an outer boundary at the root surface 119886 the water pressure
distribution inside this membrane is given by a solution to the equation
120597119901119898
120597119905=
119863
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 2)
with boundary conditions given for example by 119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 119886 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at
119903 = 119886119909 where 119901119898 is the water pressure in the root cortex tissues 119901 is the water
pressure at the root surface and 119901119903 is the water pressure in the xylem Non-
dimensionalising the above equation with typical timescale [119905] and root radius a we
find that the dimensionless problem becomes
1198862
119863 119905
120597119901119898
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 3)
With
119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 1 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at 119903 = 119886119909119886 = 119903119909 (3 4)
270 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
For small order radius water pressure distribution profile is at pseudo steady
state i e the time derivative term in the equation (3 3) is small and the steady state
solution is given by [8]
119901119898 =119901 minus 119901119903
minus119897119899 119903119909 119897119899 119903 + 119901 (3 5)
asymp119901 minus 119901119903
1 minus 119903119909 119903 minus 1 + 119901 119891119900119903 119903119909 lt 119903 lt 1
Hence in dimensional terms the ux of water through the unit of root surface
area is given approximately by
119863120597119901119898
120597119903|119903=119886 =
119863
119886minus119886119909 119901 minus 119901119903 (3 6)
where 119896119903 =119863
119886minus119886119909 is generally known as a root surface membrane hydraulic
conductivity Using boundary condition equation (3 6) at the root surface we can be
written as
119896 119878
120583
120597119901
120597119903= 119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (3 7)
where 119896(119878) is the soil water permeability 119896119903 is the radial conductivity of root surface
membrane 119901 is the water pressure in the soil 119901119909 is the water pressure in the root
xylem and 119886 is the radius of the root
4 WATER FLOW IN THE XYLEM LONGITUDINALLY UP-
WARDS INTERIOR OF ROOT
Interior parts of root are made of macro tubes of xylem with average radius
119903119898 Assume that the number of the micro-tubes is N The total area cross-section of
the micro tubes can be written as 119873empty1199031198982 = empty1198772 We assume that the water path
effectively by a single tiny circular tube with the radius 119877 Water motion in the
interior of root is described by one dimensional Poiseuille flow along the pipe with
variable cross section area of radius r [7][9]
120583nabla2119906 = nabla119901 minus 120588119892119948 (4 1)
where 119906 is water velocity profile with non-slip boundary condition which is given by
119906 119903 119911 =1199032minus1198772
4120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 2)
The total flux of water passing upwards through the cross section at the level 119911
is given by
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 271 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119902 = minusempty1198774
8120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 3)
let 119896119909 =empty1198774
8120583 then equation (4 3) becomes
119902 = minus119896119909 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 4)
5 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE THE
ROOT
We consider a unit length of the root and assume that there is balance between
water flow through the root surface membrane and upward in the xylem tubes Then
mass conservation law yields [7][9][16]
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 =120597119902
120597119911 (5 1)
where 119886 is the radius of the root and 119902 is the longitudinal flux of water Substituting
the value of (4 4) in equation (5 1) then we get an ordinary differential equation for
119901119903 as a function of 119911 i e
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (5 2)
which we can solve subject to boundary conditions
119901119903 = 119879 119886119905 119911 = 0 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 119871 (5 3)
where 119879 is the average pressure at the top of the root i e at the root-shoot boundary
and L is the length of the root
6 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE OF THE
ROOT AT CONSTANT SOIL PRESSURE
Suppose the root surrounded by water in porous medium are at constant
pressure i e 119901 = 119875 then water pressure equation in the root system is
2120587119886119896119903 119875 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 1)
Non-dimensionalise the equation (6 1) with
119911 = 119871119911lowast and 119901119903 = 119879119901119903lowast (6 2)
272 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
where 119911lowast and 119901119903lowast are the dimensionless length and pressure respectively The
dimensionless equation (6 2) becomes with dropping lowast becomes
1198962 1198750 minus 119901119903 = minus1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 3)
with dimensionless boundary condition (5 3) becomes
119901119903 = 1 at 119911 = 119900 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 1 (6 4)
where 1198750 =119875
119879 and 1198962 =
21205871198861198961199031198712
119896119909 are the dimensionless water uptake coefficients
Solution of equation (6 3) with boundary conditions (6 4) is given by
119901119903 = 1198750 +1
2 1198750 minus 1 119905119886119899119893 119896 minus 1198750+ + 1 119890119896119911 +
1
2 minus 1198750 minus 1 tan 119893 119896 minus 1198750 +
1 119890=119896119911 (6 5)
7 MODEL FOR WATER FLOW IN THE SOIL WITH ROOT
SURFACE BOUNDARY CONDITION SUBJECTED TO
CONSTANT ROOT INTERNAL PRESSURE
Water flow in soil given by equation (2 12) can be write in radial co-ordinates
form with boundary condition (3 7) is given by [10]
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 1)
with boundary condition
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (7 2)
where 119875 119903 is the constant pressure inside the root and
119863 119878 =119896119904120588119892
120583times
1 minus 119898
12057211989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 7 3
119901 119878 = minus120588119892
120572 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1119899 7 4
We non-dimensionalise this model with choice of time radius and pressure in
new scales as follows
119905 = 119905 119905lowast = empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 1205721198981198862120583
1 minus 119898 119896119904120588119892119905lowast 119903 = 119886119903lowast 120583 =
120588119892
120572119901lowast (7 5)
and the dimensionless model with boundary condition becomes by dropping
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 273 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 6)
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 120582119908 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 1 (7 7)
where
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 119901 119878 = minus 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1119899
(7 8)
and dimensionless parameters are
120582119908 =119896119903120588119892119898119886
1 minus 119898 119870119904 119908119894119905119893 119870119904 =
119896119904120588119892
120583 119886119899119889 119901119903 =
119875119903120572
120588119892 (7 9)
Equation (7 1) can also written in term of relative water saturation in the soil
[12] The equation for conservation of water in the soil is thus
120593120597119878
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = minus119865119960 (7 10)
where empty is the (constant) porosity of the soil 119878 is the relative water saturation in the
soil i e 119878 = empty119897empty where empty119897 is the volumetric water fraction 119958 is the volume flux of
water i e Darcy flux and 119865119908 is the uptake of water by plant roots Consider value of
u given in equation (2 7) with equation (2 10) Also the water pressure in the soil
pores can be linked to the relative water saturation via suction characteristic [14]
119901119886 minus 119901 = 119901119888119891 119878 119891 119878 = 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1minus119898
(7 11)
where 119901119886 is atmospheric pressure and 119901119888 is a characteristic suction pressure It is
common to take 119901119886 = 0
Then the Darcy-Richards equation in terms of relative water saturation only it
is written as
empty120597119878
120597119905= nabla 1198630119863 119878 nabla119878 minus 119870119904119870 119878 119948 minus 119865119960 (7 12)
where the water diffusivity in the soil is 1198630119863 119878 =119896
120583
120597119901
120597119878 1198630 =
119901119888119896119904
120583
1minus119898
119898 and
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 (7 13)
Also equation (2 8) can written as follows
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 267 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
of equation (2 2) is given by
119958 = 119870119869 = minus 1048576119870119892119903119886119899119889 = 1048576minus nablaempty 2 3
The average areal porosity is equal to the volumetric porosity 119899 the portion of
the area 119860 available to flow is 119899119860 The average velocity 119881 of flow is given by
119881 =119876
119899119860=
119958
119899 (2 4)
Another form of Darcy formula is in term of specific discharge i e Darcy flux is
written as
119958 = minus119948
120641 119892119903119886119899119889 119901 minus 120588119892 (2 5)
where =119896120588119892
120583 120583 is dynamic viscosity of fluid 120588 =
120574
119892 is the density of the fluid k is the
mediums permeability and 119944 = minus119944119949119963 is the vector gravity acceleration directed
downward If fluid is not compressible then nabla119906 = 0 The equation for the
conservation of water in the soil with no water sink is given by [7]
120597empty119897
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = 0 (2 6)
where 119958 is given by
119958 = minus119948
120641 nabla119901 minus 120588119892119896 (2 7)
The 119896 soil permeability is just differ from hydraulic conductivity K by scaling
factor which is given by
119870 =119896119901119892
120583 (2 8)
where 120588119892 present the density of water and gravity If soil is saturated then we have
120588119892119896 = 0 therefore the Darcy flux is given by = minus119948
120641[nablap] However the
conductivity of unsaturated soil is determined from experiments in terms of effective
water saturation where effective water saturation 119878 is defined as
119878 = empty119897 minus empty119897 119903
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 (2 9)
where empty119897 is the moisture content of the soil empty119897 119903 is the residual (minimum) moisture
content of the soil and empty119897 119904 is the saturated moisture content of the soil i e the soil
268 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
porosity Van Genuchten drive a formula for the soil hydraulic conductivity as a
function of soil moisture content and porosity which is given by [14]
119870 = 11987011990411987812[1 1048576minus (1 1048576minus 119878119898 )119898 ]2 119891119900119903 0 lt 119898 lt 1 (2 10)
where 119870119904 is the hydraulic conductivity of fully saturated soil In addition to deriving
the soil hydraulic conductivity formula (2 10) he also presents a formula for the
suction characteristic He uses the pressure head 119893 suction minus119901 gt 0 can be written in
terms of pressure head i e minus119901 = minus120588119892119893 Hence we have
= [1
1 + 120572119893 119899 ]119898 =
1
1 + 120572120588119892
minus119901 119899
119898
119898 = 1 minus1
119899 0 lt 119898 lt 1 (2 11)
where 119870119904 is a fitting parameter that can be inversely linked to the bubbling pressure
We write equation (2 6) of conservation of water in the soil in terms of relative
moisture content S using the full van Genuchten formulas and then we get the
following nonlinear diffusion-convection equation
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905= nabla 119863 119878 nabla119878 minus
120588119892
120583
119889119896
119889119878
120597119878
120597119911 2 12
where D(S) is called the soil water diffusivity and it is defined as
119863 119878 =119896 119878
120583 120597119901
120597119878
=119896119904120588119892
120583
times 1 minus 119898
prop 11989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 (2 13)
and
119889119896(119878)
119889119878= 119896119904
1
2119878minus
12 1 minus 1 minus 119878
1119898
119898
2
+ 2119878 minus12
+1119898
1 minus 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus1
(2 14)
RANGE OF VALIDITY
In the flow through conduits the Reynolds number 119877119890 which is
dimensionless number expressing the ratio of inertial to viscous forces acting on the
fluid is used as a criterion to distinguish between laminar flow occurring at low
velocities and turbulent flow occurring at higher velocities By analogy a Reynolds
number is defined also for flow through porous media [6]
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 269 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119877119890 =119958119889
119907 (2 15)
where 119889 is some representative length of the porous matrix and 119907 is the kinematic
viscosity of the fluid Practically all evidence indicates that Darcys law is valid as
long as the Reynolds number does not exceed some value between 1 and 10 There
the equation (2 12) valued as long as Darcys law obeys i e for Reynolds number
value less than flow will be at very low pressure gradients through low-permeability
sediments also for Reynolds number value greater than 10 there will be large flows
through high permeability gradients
3 WATER FLOW THROUGH ROOT SURFACE INSIDE THE
ROOT
Water flow through root surface then there will be change in water pressure
which serves as boundary condition in equation of water conservation in the root The
root surface membrane work as semi permeable membrane represents the water
movement path across the cortex to the xylem The rate of water uptake by pant roots
per unit surface area 119869119908[1198881198983119888119898minus210485761199041048576minus1] is given by [7][11]
119869119908 = 119896119903 nabla119875 minus 120589ฮprod (3 1)
where 119896119903 is the speed of water flow through the root surface membrane per unit
difference in water pressure on either side of the membrane nabla119875 is the hydraulic water
pressure across the membrane 120589 is the reflection which give relation between osmotic
pressure to hydrostatic and ฮprod is the osmotic pressure difference across the
membrane Neglecting the osmotic pressure effects on water uptake by plant roots and
119863 is the water diffusivity in cortical tissues then for a root surface membrane with the
inner boundary at 119886119909 and an outer boundary at the root surface 119886 the water pressure
distribution inside this membrane is given by a solution to the equation
120597119901119898
120597119905=
119863
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 2)
with boundary conditions given for example by 119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 119886 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at
119903 = 119886119909 where 119901119898 is the water pressure in the root cortex tissues 119901 is the water
pressure at the root surface and 119901119903 is the water pressure in the xylem Non-
dimensionalising the above equation with typical timescale [119905] and root radius a we
find that the dimensionless problem becomes
1198862
119863 119905
120597119901119898
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 3)
With
119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 1 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at 119903 = 119886119909119886 = 119903119909 (3 4)
270 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
For small order radius water pressure distribution profile is at pseudo steady
state i e the time derivative term in the equation (3 3) is small and the steady state
solution is given by [8]
119901119898 =119901 minus 119901119903
minus119897119899 119903119909 119897119899 119903 + 119901 (3 5)
asymp119901 minus 119901119903
1 minus 119903119909 119903 minus 1 + 119901 119891119900119903 119903119909 lt 119903 lt 1
Hence in dimensional terms the ux of water through the unit of root surface
area is given approximately by
119863120597119901119898
120597119903|119903=119886 =
119863
119886minus119886119909 119901 minus 119901119903 (3 6)
where 119896119903 =119863
119886minus119886119909 is generally known as a root surface membrane hydraulic
conductivity Using boundary condition equation (3 6) at the root surface we can be
written as
119896 119878
120583
120597119901
120597119903= 119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (3 7)
where 119896(119878) is the soil water permeability 119896119903 is the radial conductivity of root surface
membrane 119901 is the water pressure in the soil 119901119909 is the water pressure in the root
xylem and 119886 is the radius of the root
4 WATER FLOW IN THE XYLEM LONGITUDINALLY UP-
WARDS INTERIOR OF ROOT
Interior parts of root are made of macro tubes of xylem with average radius
119903119898 Assume that the number of the micro-tubes is N The total area cross-section of
the micro tubes can be written as 119873empty1199031198982 = empty1198772 We assume that the water path
effectively by a single tiny circular tube with the radius 119877 Water motion in the
interior of root is described by one dimensional Poiseuille flow along the pipe with
variable cross section area of radius r [7][9]
120583nabla2119906 = nabla119901 minus 120588119892119948 (4 1)
where 119906 is water velocity profile with non-slip boundary condition which is given by
119906 119903 119911 =1199032minus1198772
4120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 2)
The total flux of water passing upwards through the cross section at the level 119911
is given by
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 271 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119902 = minusempty1198774
8120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 3)
let 119896119909 =empty1198774
8120583 then equation (4 3) becomes
119902 = minus119896119909 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 4)
5 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE THE
ROOT
We consider a unit length of the root and assume that there is balance between
water flow through the root surface membrane and upward in the xylem tubes Then
mass conservation law yields [7][9][16]
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 =120597119902
120597119911 (5 1)
where 119886 is the radius of the root and 119902 is the longitudinal flux of water Substituting
the value of (4 4) in equation (5 1) then we get an ordinary differential equation for
119901119903 as a function of 119911 i e
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (5 2)
which we can solve subject to boundary conditions
119901119903 = 119879 119886119905 119911 = 0 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 119871 (5 3)
where 119879 is the average pressure at the top of the root i e at the root-shoot boundary
and L is the length of the root
6 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE OF THE
ROOT AT CONSTANT SOIL PRESSURE
Suppose the root surrounded by water in porous medium are at constant
pressure i e 119901 = 119875 then water pressure equation in the root system is
2120587119886119896119903 119875 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 1)
Non-dimensionalise the equation (6 1) with
119911 = 119871119911lowast and 119901119903 = 119879119901119903lowast (6 2)
272 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
where 119911lowast and 119901119903lowast are the dimensionless length and pressure respectively The
dimensionless equation (6 2) becomes with dropping lowast becomes
1198962 1198750 minus 119901119903 = minus1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 3)
with dimensionless boundary condition (5 3) becomes
119901119903 = 1 at 119911 = 119900 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 1 (6 4)
where 1198750 =119875
119879 and 1198962 =
21205871198861198961199031198712
119896119909 are the dimensionless water uptake coefficients
Solution of equation (6 3) with boundary conditions (6 4) is given by
119901119903 = 1198750 +1
2 1198750 minus 1 119905119886119899119893 119896 minus 1198750+ + 1 119890119896119911 +
1
2 minus 1198750 minus 1 tan 119893 119896 minus 1198750 +
1 119890=119896119911 (6 5)
7 MODEL FOR WATER FLOW IN THE SOIL WITH ROOT
SURFACE BOUNDARY CONDITION SUBJECTED TO
CONSTANT ROOT INTERNAL PRESSURE
Water flow in soil given by equation (2 12) can be write in radial co-ordinates
form with boundary condition (3 7) is given by [10]
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 1)
with boundary condition
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (7 2)
where 119875 119903 is the constant pressure inside the root and
119863 119878 =119896119904120588119892
120583times
1 minus 119898
12057211989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 7 3
119901 119878 = minus120588119892
120572 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1119899 7 4
We non-dimensionalise this model with choice of time radius and pressure in
new scales as follows
119905 = 119905 119905lowast = empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 1205721198981198862120583
1 minus 119898 119896119904120588119892119905lowast 119903 = 119886119903lowast 120583 =
120588119892
120572119901lowast (7 5)
and the dimensionless model with boundary condition becomes by dropping
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 273 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 6)
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 120582119908 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 1 (7 7)
where
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 119901 119878 = minus 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1119899
(7 8)
and dimensionless parameters are
120582119908 =119896119903120588119892119898119886
1 minus 119898 119870119904 119908119894119905119893 119870119904 =
119896119904120588119892
120583 119886119899119889 119901119903 =
119875119903120572
120588119892 (7 9)
Equation (7 1) can also written in term of relative water saturation in the soil
[12] The equation for conservation of water in the soil is thus
120593120597119878
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = minus119865119960 (7 10)
where empty is the (constant) porosity of the soil 119878 is the relative water saturation in the
soil i e 119878 = empty119897empty where empty119897 is the volumetric water fraction 119958 is the volume flux of
water i e Darcy flux and 119865119908 is the uptake of water by plant roots Consider value of
u given in equation (2 7) with equation (2 10) Also the water pressure in the soil
pores can be linked to the relative water saturation via suction characteristic [14]
119901119886 minus 119901 = 119901119888119891 119878 119891 119878 = 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1minus119898
(7 11)
where 119901119886 is atmospheric pressure and 119901119888 is a characteristic suction pressure It is
common to take 119901119886 = 0
Then the Darcy-Richards equation in terms of relative water saturation only it
is written as
empty120597119878
120597119905= nabla 1198630119863 119878 nabla119878 minus 119870119904119870 119878 119948 minus 119865119960 (7 12)
where the water diffusivity in the soil is 1198630119863 119878 =119896
120583
120597119901
120597119878 1198630 =
119901119888119896119904
120583
1minus119898
119898 and
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 (7 13)
Also equation (2 8) can written as follows
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
268 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
porosity Van Genuchten drive a formula for the soil hydraulic conductivity as a
function of soil moisture content and porosity which is given by [14]
119870 = 11987011990411987812[1 1048576minus (1 1048576minus 119878119898 )119898 ]2 119891119900119903 0 lt 119898 lt 1 (2 10)
where 119870119904 is the hydraulic conductivity of fully saturated soil In addition to deriving
the soil hydraulic conductivity formula (2 10) he also presents a formula for the
suction characteristic He uses the pressure head 119893 suction minus119901 gt 0 can be written in
terms of pressure head i e minus119901 = minus120588119892119893 Hence we have
= [1
1 + 120572119893 119899 ]119898 =
1
1 + 120572120588119892
minus119901 119899
119898
119898 = 1 minus1
119899 0 lt 119898 lt 1 (2 11)
where 119870119904 is a fitting parameter that can be inversely linked to the bubbling pressure
We write equation (2 6) of conservation of water in the soil in terms of relative
moisture content S using the full van Genuchten formulas and then we get the
following nonlinear diffusion-convection equation
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905= nabla 119863 119878 nabla119878 minus
120588119892
120583
119889119896
119889119878
120597119878
120597119911 2 12
where D(S) is called the soil water diffusivity and it is defined as
119863 119878 =119896 119878
120583 120597119901
120597119878
=119896119904120588119892
120583
times 1 minus 119898
prop 11989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 (2 13)
and
119889119896(119878)
119889119878= 119896119904
1
2119878minus
12 1 minus 1 minus 119878
1119898
119898
2
+ 2119878 minus12
+1119898
1 minus 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus1
(2 14)
RANGE OF VALIDITY
In the flow through conduits the Reynolds number 119877119890 which is
dimensionless number expressing the ratio of inertial to viscous forces acting on the
fluid is used as a criterion to distinguish between laminar flow occurring at low
velocities and turbulent flow occurring at higher velocities By analogy a Reynolds
number is defined also for flow through porous media [6]
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 269 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119877119890 =119958119889
119907 (2 15)
where 119889 is some representative length of the porous matrix and 119907 is the kinematic
viscosity of the fluid Practically all evidence indicates that Darcys law is valid as
long as the Reynolds number does not exceed some value between 1 and 10 There
the equation (2 12) valued as long as Darcys law obeys i e for Reynolds number
value less than flow will be at very low pressure gradients through low-permeability
sediments also for Reynolds number value greater than 10 there will be large flows
through high permeability gradients
3 WATER FLOW THROUGH ROOT SURFACE INSIDE THE
ROOT
Water flow through root surface then there will be change in water pressure
which serves as boundary condition in equation of water conservation in the root The
root surface membrane work as semi permeable membrane represents the water
movement path across the cortex to the xylem The rate of water uptake by pant roots
per unit surface area 119869119908[1198881198983119888119898minus210485761199041048576minus1] is given by [7][11]
119869119908 = 119896119903 nabla119875 minus 120589ฮprod (3 1)
where 119896119903 is the speed of water flow through the root surface membrane per unit
difference in water pressure on either side of the membrane nabla119875 is the hydraulic water
pressure across the membrane 120589 is the reflection which give relation between osmotic
pressure to hydrostatic and ฮprod is the osmotic pressure difference across the
membrane Neglecting the osmotic pressure effects on water uptake by plant roots and
119863 is the water diffusivity in cortical tissues then for a root surface membrane with the
inner boundary at 119886119909 and an outer boundary at the root surface 119886 the water pressure
distribution inside this membrane is given by a solution to the equation
120597119901119898
120597119905=
119863
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 2)
with boundary conditions given for example by 119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 119886 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at
119903 = 119886119909 where 119901119898 is the water pressure in the root cortex tissues 119901 is the water
pressure at the root surface and 119901119903 is the water pressure in the xylem Non-
dimensionalising the above equation with typical timescale [119905] and root radius a we
find that the dimensionless problem becomes
1198862
119863 119905
120597119901119898
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 3)
With
119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 1 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at 119903 = 119886119909119886 = 119903119909 (3 4)
270 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
For small order radius water pressure distribution profile is at pseudo steady
state i e the time derivative term in the equation (3 3) is small and the steady state
solution is given by [8]
119901119898 =119901 minus 119901119903
minus119897119899 119903119909 119897119899 119903 + 119901 (3 5)
asymp119901 minus 119901119903
1 minus 119903119909 119903 minus 1 + 119901 119891119900119903 119903119909 lt 119903 lt 1
Hence in dimensional terms the ux of water through the unit of root surface
area is given approximately by
119863120597119901119898
120597119903|119903=119886 =
119863
119886minus119886119909 119901 minus 119901119903 (3 6)
where 119896119903 =119863
119886minus119886119909 is generally known as a root surface membrane hydraulic
conductivity Using boundary condition equation (3 6) at the root surface we can be
written as
119896 119878
120583
120597119901
120597119903= 119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (3 7)
where 119896(119878) is the soil water permeability 119896119903 is the radial conductivity of root surface
membrane 119901 is the water pressure in the soil 119901119909 is the water pressure in the root
xylem and 119886 is the radius of the root
4 WATER FLOW IN THE XYLEM LONGITUDINALLY UP-
WARDS INTERIOR OF ROOT
Interior parts of root are made of macro tubes of xylem with average radius
119903119898 Assume that the number of the micro-tubes is N The total area cross-section of
the micro tubes can be written as 119873empty1199031198982 = empty1198772 We assume that the water path
effectively by a single tiny circular tube with the radius 119877 Water motion in the
interior of root is described by one dimensional Poiseuille flow along the pipe with
variable cross section area of radius r [7][9]
120583nabla2119906 = nabla119901 minus 120588119892119948 (4 1)
where 119906 is water velocity profile with non-slip boundary condition which is given by
119906 119903 119911 =1199032minus1198772
4120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 2)
The total flux of water passing upwards through the cross section at the level 119911
is given by
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 271 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119902 = minusempty1198774
8120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 3)
let 119896119909 =empty1198774
8120583 then equation (4 3) becomes
119902 = minus119896119909 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 4)
5 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE THE
ROOT
We consider a unit length of the root and assume that there is balance between
water flow through the root surface membrane and upward in the xylem tubes Then
mass conservation law yields [7][9][16]
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 =120597119902
120597119911 (5 1)
where 119886 is the radius of the root and 119902 is the longitudinal flux of water Substituting
the value of (4 4) in equation (5 1) then we get an ordinary differential equation for
119901119903 as a function of 119911 i e
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (5 2)
which we can solve subject to boundary conditions
119901119903 = 119879 119886119905 119911 = 0 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 119871 (5 3)
where 119879 is the average pressure at the top of the root i e at the root-shoot boundary
and L is the length of the root
6 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE OF THE
ROOT AT CONSTANT SOIL PRESSURE
Suppose the root surrounded by water in porous medium are at constant
pressure i e 119901 = 119875 then water pressure equation in the root system is
2120587119886119896119903 119875 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 1)
Non-dimensionalise the equation (6 1) with
119911 = 119871119911lowast and 119901119903 = 119879119901119903lowast (6 2)
272 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
where 119911lowast and 119901119903lowast are the dimensionless length and pressure respectively The
dimensionless equation (6 2) becomes with dropping lowast becomes
1198962 1198750 minus 119901119903 = minus1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 3)
with dimensionless boundary condition (5 3) becomes
119901119903 = 1 at 119911 = 119900 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 1 (6 4)
where 1198750 =119875
119879 and 1198962 =
21205871198861198961199031198712
119896119909 are the dimensionless water uptake coefficients
Solution of equation (6 3) with boundary conditions (6 4) is given by
119901119903 = 1198750 +1
2 1198750 minus 1 119905119886119899119893 119896 minus 1198750+ + 1 119890119896119911 +
1
2 minus 1198750 minus 1 tan 119893 119896 minus 1198750 +
1 119890=119896119911 (6 5)
7 MODEL FOR WATER FLOW IN THE SOIL WITH ROOT
SURFACE BOUNDARY CONDITION SUBJECTED TO
CONSTANT ROOT INTERNAL PRESSURE
Water flow in soil given by equation (2 12) can be write in radial co-ordinates
form with boundary condition (3 7) is given by [10]
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 1)
with boundary condition
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (7 2)
where 119875 119903 is the constant pressure inside the root and
119863 119878 =119896119904120588119892
120583times
1 minus 119898
12057211989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 7 3
119901 119878 = minus120588119892
120572 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1119899 7 4
We non-dimensionalise this model with choice of time radius and pressure in
new scales as follows
119905 = 119905 119905lowast = empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 1205721198981198862120583
1 minus 119898 119896119904120588119892119905lowast 119903 = 119886119903lowast 120583 =
120588119892
120572119901lowast (7 5)
and the dimensionless model with boundary condition becomes by dropping
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 273 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 6)
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 120582119908 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 1 (7 7)
where
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 119901 119878 = minus 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1119899
(7 8)
and dimensionless parameters are
120582119908 =119896119903120588119892119898119886
1 minus 119898 119870119904 119908119894119905119893 119870119904 =
119896119904120588119892
120583 119886119899119889 119901119903 =
119875119903120572
120588119892 (7 9)
Equation (7 1) can also written in term of relative water saturation in the soil
[12] The equation for conservation of water in the soil is thus
120593120597119878
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = minus119865119960 (7 10)
where empty is the (constant) porosity of the soil 119878 is the relative water saturation in the
soil i e 119878 = empty119897empty where empty119897 is the volumetric water fraction 119958 is the volume flux of
water i e Darcy flux and 119865119908 is the uptake of water by plant roots Consider value of
u given in equation (2 7) with equation (2 10) Also the water pressure in the soil
pores can be linked to the relative water saturation via suction characteristic [14]
119901119886 minus 119901 = 119901119888119891 119878 119891 119878 = 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1minus119898
(7 11)
where 119901119886 is atmospheric pressure and 119901119888 is a characteristic suction pressure It is
common to take 119901119886 = 0
Then the Darcy-Richards equation in terms of relative water saturation only it
is written as
empty120597119878
120597119905= nabla 1198630119863 119878 nabla119878 minus 119870119904119870 119878 119948 minus 119865119960 (7 12)
where the water diffusivity in the soil is 1198630119863 119878 =119896
120583
120597119901
120597119878 1198630 =
119901119888119896119904
120583
1minus119898
119898 and
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 (7 13)
Also equation (2 8) can written as follows
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 269 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119877119890 =119958119889
119907 (2 15)
where 119889 is some representative length of the porous matrix and 119907 is the kinematic
viscosity of the fluid Practically all evidence indicates that Darcys law is valid as
long as the Reynolds number does not exceed some value between 1 and 10 There
the equation (2 12) valued as long as Darcys law obeys i e for Reynolds number
value less than flow will be at very low pressure gradients through low-permeability
sediments also for Reynolds number value greater than 10 there will be large flows
through high permeability gradients
3 WATER FLOW THROUGH ROOT SURFACE INSIDE THE
ROOT
Water flow through root surface then there will be change in water pressure
which serves as boundary condition in equation of water conservation in the root The
root surface membrane work as semi permeable membrane represents the water
movement path across the cortex to the xylem The rate of water uptake by pant roots
per unit surface area 119869119908[1198881198983119888119898minus210485761199041048576minus1] is given by [7][11]
119869119908 = 119896119903 nabla119875 minus 120589ฮprod (3 1)
where 119896119903 is the speed of water flow through the root surface membrane per unit
difference in water pressure on either side of the membrane nabla119875 is the hydraulic water
pressure across the membrane 120589 is the reflection which give relation between osmotic
pressure to hydrostatic and ฮprod is the osmotic pressure difference across the
membrane Neglecting the osmotic pressure effects on water uptake by plant roots and
119863 is the water diffusivity in cortical tissues then for a root surface membrane with the
inner boundary at 119886119909 and an outer boundary at the root surface 119886 the water pressure
distribution inside this membrane is given by a solution to the equation
120597119901119898
120597119905=
119863
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 2)
with boundary conditions given for example by 119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 119886 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at
119903 = 119886119909 where 119901119898 is the water pressure in the root cortex tissues 119901 is the water
pressure at the root surface and 119901119903 is the water pressure in the xylem Non-
dimensionalising the above equation with typical timescale [119905] and root radius a we
find that the dimensionless problem becomes
1198862
119863 119905
120597119901119898
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903
120597119901119898
120597119903 (3 3)
With
119901119898 = 119901 on 119903 = 1 and 119901119898 = 119901119903 at 119903 = 119886119909119886 = 119903119909 (3 4)
270 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
For small order radius water pressure distribution profile is at pseudo steady
state i e the time derivative term in the equation (3 3) is small and the steady state
solution is given by [8]
119901119898 =119901 minus 119901119903
minus119897119899 119903119909 119897119899 119903 + 119901 (3 5)
asymp119901 minus 119901119903
1 minus 119903119909 119903 minus 1 + 119901 119891119900119903 119903119909 lt 119903 lt 1
Hence in dimensional terms the ux of water through the unit of root surface
area is given approximately by
119863120597119901119898
120597119903|119903=119886 =
119863
119886minus119886119909 119901 minus 119901119903 (3 6)
where 119896119903 =119863
119886minus119886119909 is generally known as a root surface membrane hydraulic
conductivity Using boundary condition equation (3 6) at the root surface we can be
written as
119896 119878
120583
120597119901
120597119903= 119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (3 7)
where 119896(119878) is the soil water permeability 119896119903 is the radial conductivity of root surface
membrane 119901 is the water pressure in the soil 119901119909 is the water pressure in the root
xylem and 119886 is the radius of the root
4 WATER FLOW IN THE XYLEM LONGITUDINALLY UP-
WARDS INTERIOR OF ROOT
Interior parts of root are made of macro tubes of xylem with average radius
119903119898 Assume that the number of the micro-tubes is N The total area cross-section of
the micro tubes can be written as 119873empty1199031198982 = empty1198772 We assume that the water path
effectively by a single tiny circular tube with the radius 119877 Water motion in the
interior of root is described by one dimensional Poiseuille flow along the pipe with
variable cross section area of radius r [7][9]
120583nabla2119906 = nabla119901 minus 120588119892119948 (4 1)
where 119906 is water velocity profile with non-slip boundary condition which is given by
119906 119903 119911 =1199032minus1198772
4120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 2)
The total flux of water passing upwards through the cross section at the level 119911
is given by
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 271 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119902 = minusempty1198774
8120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 3)
let 119896119909 =empty1198774
8120583 then equation (4 3) becomes
119902 = minus119896119909 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 4)
5 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE THE
ROOT
We consider a unit length of the root and assume that there is balance between
water flow through the root surface membrane and upward in the xylem tubes Then
mass conservation law yields [7][9][16]
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 =120597119902
120597119911 (5 1)
where 119886 is the radius of the root and 119902 is the longitudinal flux of water Substituting
the value of (4 4) in equation (5 1) then we get an ordinary differential equation for
119901119903 as a function of 119911 i e
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (5 2)
which we can solve subject to boundary conditions
119901119903 = 119879 119886119905 119911 = 0 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 119871 (5 3)
where 119879 is the average pressure at the top of the root i e at the root-shoot boundary
and L is the length of the root
6 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE OF THE
ROOT AT CONSTANT SOIL PRESSURE
Suppose the root surrounded by water in porous medium are at constant
pressure i e 119901 = 119875 then water pressure equation in the root system is
2120587119886119896119903 119875 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 1)
Non-dimensionalise the equation (6 1) with
119911 = 119871119911lowast and 119901119903 = 119879119901119903lowast (6 2)
272 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
where 119911lowast and 119901119903lowast are the dimensionless length and pressure respectively The
dimensionless equation (6 2) becomes with dropping lowast becomes
1198962 1198750 minus 119901119903 = minus1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 3)
with dimensionless boundary condition (5 3) becomes
119901119903 = 1 at 119911 = 119900 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 1 (6 4)
where 1198750 =119875
119879 and 1198962 =
21205871198861198961199031198712
119896119909 are the dimensionless water uptake coefficients
Solution of equation (6 3) with boundary conditions (6 4) is given by
119901119903 = 1198750 +1
2 1198750 minus 1 119905119886119899119893 119896 minus 1198750+ + 1 119890119896119911 +
1
2 minus 1198750 minus 1 tan 119893 119896 minus 1198750 +
1 119890=119896119911 (6 5)
7 MODEL FOR WATER FLOW IN THE SOIL WITH ROOT
SURFACE BOUNDARY CONDITION SUBJECTED TO
CONSTANT ROOT INTERNAL PRESSURE
Water flow in soil given by equation (2 12) can be write in radial co-ordinates
form with boundary condition (3 7) is given by [10]
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 1)
with boundary condition
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (7 2)
where 119875 119903 is the constant pressure inside the root and
119863 119878 =119896119904120588119892
120583times
1 minus 119898
12057211989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 7 3
119901 119878 = minus120588119892
120572 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1119899 7 4
We non-dimensionalise this model with choice of time radius and pressure in
new scales as follows
119905 = 119905 119905lowast = empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 1205721198981198862120583
1 minus 119898 119896119904120588119892119905lowast 119903 = 119886119903lowast 120583 =
120588119892
120572119901lowast (7 5)
and the dimensionless model with boundary condition becomes by dropping
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 273 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 6)
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 120582119908 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 1 (7 7)
where
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 119901 119878 = minus 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1119899
(7 8)
and dimensionless parameters are
120582119908 =119896119903120588119892119898119886
1 minus 119898 119870119904 119908119894119905119893 119870119904 =
119896119904120588119892
120583 119886119899119889 119901119903 =
119875119903120572
120588119892 (7 9)
Equation (7 1) can also written in term of relative water saturation in the soil
[12] The equation for conservation of water in the soil is thus
120593120597119878
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = minus119865119960 (7 10)
where empty is the (constant) porosity of the soil 119878 is the relative water saturation in the
soil i e 119878 = empty119897empty where empty119897 is the volumetric water fraction 119958 is the volume flux of
water i e Darcy flux and 119865119908 is the uptake of water by plant roots Consider value of
u given in equation (2 7) with equation (2 10) Also the water pressure in the soil
pores can be linked to the relative water saturation via suction characteristic [14]
119901119886 minus 119901 = 119901119888119891 119878 119891 119878 = 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1minus119898
(7 11)
where 119901119886 is atmospheric pressure and 119901119888 is a characteristic suction pressure It is
common to take 119901119886 = 0
Then the Darcy-Richards equation in terms of relative water saturation only it
is written as
empty120597119878
120597119905= nabla 1198630119863 119878 nabla119878 minus 119870119904119870 119878 119948 minus 119865119960 (7 12)
where the water diffusivity in the soil is 1198630119863 119878 =119896
120583
120597119901
120597119878 1198630 =
119901119888119896119904
120583
1minus119898
119898 and
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 (7 13)
Also equation (2 8) can written as follows
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
270 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
For small order radius water pressure distribution profile is at pseudo steady
state i e the time derivative term in the equation (3 3) is small and the steady state
solution is given by [8]
119901119898 =119901 minus 119901119903
minus119897119899 119903119909 119897119899 119903 + 119901 (3 5)
asymp119901 minus 119901119903
1 minus 119903119909 119903 minus 1 + 119901 119891119900119903 119903119909 lt 119903 lt 1
Hence in dimensional terms the ux of water through the unit of root surface
area is given approximately by
119863120597119901119898
120597119903|119903=119886 =
119863
119886minus119886119909 119901 minus 119901119903 (3 6)
where 119896119903 =119863
119886minus119886119909 is generally known as a root surface membrane hydraulic
conductivity Using boundary condition equation (3 6) at the root surface we can be
written as
119896 119878
120583
120597119901
120597119903= 119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (3 7)
where 119896(119878) is the soil water permeability 119896119903 is the radial conductivity of root surface
membrane 119901 is the water pressure in the soil 119901119909 is the water pressure in the root
xylem and 119886 is the radius of the root
4 WATER FLOW IN THE XYLEM LONGITUDINALLY UP-
WARDS INTERIOR OF ROOT
Interior parts of root are made of macro tubes of xylem with average radius
119903119898 Assume that the number of the micro-tubes is N The total area cross-section of
the micro tubes can be written as 119873empty1199031198982 = empty1198772 We assume that the water path
effectively by a single tiny circular tube with the radius 119877 Water motion in the
interior of root is described by one dimensional Poiseuille flow along the pipe with
variable cross section area of radius r [7][9]
120583nabla2119906 = nabla119901 minus 120588119892119948 (4 1)
where 119906 is water velocity profile with non-slip boundary condition which is given by
119906 119903 119911 =1199032minus1198772
4120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 2)
The total flux of water passing upwards through the cross section at the level 119911
is given by
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 271 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119902 = minusempty1198774
8120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 3)
let 119896119909 =empty1198774
8120583 then equation (4 3) becomes
119902 = minus119896119909 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 4)
5 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE THE
ROOT
We consider a unit length of the root and assume that there is balance between
water flow through the root surface membrane and upward in the xylem tubes Then
mass conservation law yields [7][9][16]
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 =120597119902
120597119911 (5 1)
where 119886 is the radius of the root and 119902 is the longitudinal flux of water Substituting
the value of (4 4) in equation (5 1) then we get an ordinary differential equation for
119901119903 as a function of 119911 i e
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (5 2)
which we can solve subject to boundary conditions
119901119903 = 119879 119886119905 119911 = 0 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 119871 (5 3)
where 119879 is the average pressure at the top of the root i e at the root-shoot boundary
and L is the length of the root
6 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE OF THE
ROOT AT CONSTANT SOIL PRESSURE
Suppose the root surrounded by water in porous medium are at constant
pressure i e 119901 = 119875 then water pressure equation in the root system is
2120587119886119896119903 119875 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 1)
Non-dimensionalise the equation (6 1) with
119911 = 119871119911lowast and 119901119903 = 119879119901119903lowast (6 2)
272 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
where 119911lowast and 119901119903lowast are the dimensionless length and pressure respectively The
dimensionless equation (6 2) becomes with dropping lowast becomes
1198962 1198750 minus 119901119903 = minus1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 3)
with dimensionless boundary condition (5 3) becomes
119901119903 = 1 at 119911 = 119900 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 1 (6 4)
where 1198750 =119875
119879 and 1198962 =
21205871198861198961199031198712
119896119909 are the dimensionless water uptake coefficients
Solution of equation (6 3) with boundary conditions (6 4) is given by
119901119903 = 1198750 +1
2 1198750 minus 1 119905119886119899119893 119896 minus 1198750+ + 1 119890119896119911 +
1
2 minus 1198750 minus 1 tan 119893 119896 minus 1198750 +
1 119890=119896119911 (6 5)
7 MODEL FOR WATER FLOW IN THE SOIL WITH ROOT
SURFACE BOUNDARY CONDITION SUBJECTED TO
CONSTANT ROOT INTERNAL PRESSURE
Water flow in soil given by equation (2 12) can be write in radial co-ordinates
form with boundary condition (3 7) is given by [10]
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 1)
with boundary condition
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (7 2)
where 119875 119903 is the constant pressure inside the root and
119863 119878 =119896119904120588119892
120583times
1 minus 119898
12057211989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 7 3
119901 119878 = minus120588119892
120572 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1119899 7 4
We non-dimensionalise this model with choice of time radius and pressure in
new scales as follows
119905 = 119905 119905lowast = empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 1205721198981198862120583
1 minus 119898 119896119904120588119892119905lowast 119903 = 119886119903lowast 120583 =
120588119892
120572119901lowast (7 5)
and the dimensionless model with boundary condition becomes by dropping
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 273 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 6)
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 120582119908 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 1 (7 7)
where
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 119901 119878 = minus 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1119899
(7 8)
and dimensionless parameters are
120582119908 =119896119903120588119892119898119886
1 minus 119898 119870119904 119908119894119905119893 119870119904 =
119896119904120588119892
120583 119886119899119889 119901119903 =
119875119903120572
120588119892 (7 9)
Equation (7 1) can also written in term of relative water saturation in the soil
[12] The equation for conservation of water in the soil is thus
120593120597119878
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = minus119865119960 (7 10)
where empty is the (constant) porosity of the soil 119878 is the relative water saturation in the
soil i e 119878 = empty119897empty where empty119897 is the volumetric water fraction 119958 is the volume flux of
water i e Darcy flux and 119865119908 is the uptake of water by plant roots Consider value of
u given in equation (2 7) with equation (2 10) Also the water pressure in the soil
pores can be linked to the relative water saturation via suction characteristic [14]
119901119886 minus 119901 = 119901119888119891 119878 119891 119878 = 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1minus119898
(7 11)
where 119901119886 is atmospheric pressure and 119901119888 is a characteristic suction pressure It is
common to take 119901119886 = 0
Then the Darcy-Richards equation in terms of relative water saturation only it
is written as
empty120597119878
120597119905= nabla 1198630119863 119878 nabla119878 minus 119870119904119870 119878 119948 minus 119865119960 (7 12)
where the water diffusivity in the soil is 1198630119863 119878 =119896
120583
120597119901
120597119878 1198630 =
119901119888119896119904
120583
1minus119898
119898 and
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 (7 13)
Also equation (2 8) can written as follows
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 271 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119902 = minusempty1198774
8120583 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 3)
let 119896119909 =empty1198774
8120583 then equation (4 3) becomes
119902 = minus119896119909 120597119901119903
120597119911minus 120588119892 (4 4)
5 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE THE
ROOT
We consider a unit length of the root and assume that there is balance between
water flow through the root surface membrane and upward in the xylem tubes Then
mass conservation law yields [7][9][16]
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 =120597119902
120597119911 (5 1)
where 119886 is the radius of the root and 119902 is the longitudinal flux of water Substituting
the value of (4 4) in equation (5 1) then we get an ordinary differential equation for
119901119903 as a function of 119911 i e
2120587119886119896119903 119901 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (5 2)
which we can solve subject to boundary conditions
119901119903 = 119879 119886119905 119911 = 0 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 119871 (5 3)
where 119879 is the average pressure at the top of the root i e at the root-shoot boundary
and L is the length of the root
6 MODEL FOR CONSERVATION OF WATER INSIDE OF THE
ROOT AT CONSTANT SOIL PRESSURE
Suppose the root surrounded by water in porous medium are at constant
pressure i e 119901 = 119875 then water pressure equation in the root system is
2120587119886119896119903 119875 minus 119901119903 = minus119896119909
1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 1)
Non-dimensionalise the equation (6 1) with
119911 = 119871119911lowast and 119901119903 = 119879119901119903lowast (6 2)
272 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
where 119911lowast and 119901119903lowast are the dimensionless length and pressure respectively The
dimensionless equation (6 2) becomes with dropping lowast becomes
1198962 1198750 minus 119901119903 = minus1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 3)
with dimensionless boundary condition (5 3) becomes
119901119903 = 1 at 119911 = 119900 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 1 (6 4)
where 1198750 =119875
119879 and 1198962 =
21205871198861198961199031198712
119896119909 are the dimensionless water uptake coefficients
Solution of equation (6 3) with boundary conditions (6 4) is given by
119901119903 = 1198750 +1
2 1198750 minus 1 119905119886119899119893 119896 minus 1198750+ + 1 119890119896119911 +
1
2 minus 1198750 minus 1 tan 119893 119896 minus 1198750 +
1 119890=119896119911 (6 5)
7 MODEL FOR WATER FLOW IN THE SOIL WITH ROOT
SURFACE BOUNDARY CONDITION SUBJECTED TO
CONSTANT ROOT INTERNAL PRESSURE
Water flow in soil given by equation (2 12) can be write in radial co-ordinates
form with boundary condition (3 7) is given by [10]
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 1)
with boundary condition
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (7 2)
where 119875 119903 is the constant pressure inside the root and
119863 119878 =119896119904120588119892
120583times
1 minus 119898
12057211989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 7 3
119901 119878 = minus120588119892
120572 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1119899 7 4
We non-dimensionalise this model with choice of time radius and pressure in
new scales as follows
119905 = 119905 119905lowast = empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 1205721198981198862120583
1 minus 119898 119896119904120588119892119905lowast 119903 = 119886119903lowast 120583 =
120588119892
120572119901lowast (7 5)
and the dimensionless model with boundary condition becomes by dropping
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 273 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 6)
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 120582119908 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 1 (7 7)
where
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 119901 119878 = minus 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1119899
(7 8)
and dimensionless parameters are
120582119908 =119896119903120588119892119898119886
1 minus 119898 119870119904 119908119894119905119893 119870119904 =
119896119904120588119892
120583 119886119899119889 119901119903 =
119875119903120572
120588119892 (7 9)
Equation (7 1) can also written in term of relative water saturation in the soil
[12] The equation for conservation of water in the soil is thus
120593120597119878
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = minus119865119960 (7 10)
where empty is the (constant) porosity of the soil 119878 is the relative water saturation in the
soil i e 119878 = empty119897empty where empty119897 is the volumetric water fraction 119958 is the volume flux of
water i e Darcy flux and 119865119908 is the uptake of water by plant roots Consider value of
u given in equation (2 7) with equation (2 10) Also the water pressure in the soil
pores can be linked to the relative water saturation via suction characteristic [14]
119901119886 minus 119901 = 119901119888119891 119878 119891 119878 = 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1minus119898
(7 11)
where 119901119886 is atmospheric pressure and 119901119888 is a characteristic suction pressure It is
common to take 119901119886 = 0
Then the Darcy-Richards equation in terms of relative water saturation only it
is written as
empty120597119878
120597119905= nabla 1198630119863 119878 nabla119878 minus 119870119904119870 119878 119948 minus 119865119960 (7 12)
where the water diffusivity in the soil is 1198630119863 119878 =119896
120583
120597119901
120597119878 1198630 =
119901119888119896119904
120583
1minus119898
119898 and
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 (7 13)
Also equation (2 8) can written as follows
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
272 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
where 119911lowast and 119901119903lowast are the dimensionless length and pressure respectively The
dimensionless equation (6 2) becomes with dropping lowast becomes
1198962 1198750 minus 119901119903 = minus1205972119901119903
1205971199112 (6 3)
with dimensionless boundary condition (5 3) becomes
119901119903 = 1 at 119911 = 119900 and 120597119901119903
120597119911= 0 at 119911 = 1 (6 4)
where 1198750 =119875
119879 and 1198962 =
21205871198861198961199031198712
119896119909 are the dimensionless water uptake coefficients
Solution of equation (6 3) with boundary conditions (6 4) is given by
119901119903 = 1198750 +1
2 1198750 minus 1 119905119886119899119893 119896 minus 1198750+ + 1 119890119896119911 +
1
2 minus 1198750 minus 1 tan 119893 119896 minus 1198750 +
1 119890=119896119911 (6 5)
7 MODEL FOR WATER FLOW IN THE SOIL WITH ROOT
SURFACE BOUNDARY CONDITION SUBJECTED TO
CONSTANT ROOT INTERNAL PRESSURE
Water flow in soil given by equation (2 12) can be write in radial co-ordinates
form with boundary condition (3 7) is given by [10]
empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 1)
with boundary condition
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886 (7 2)
where 119875 119903 is the constant pressure inside the root and
119863 119878 =119896119904120588119892
120583times
1 minus 119898
12057211989811987812minus1119898 1 minus 1198781119898
minus119898+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898minus 2 7 3
119901 119878 = minus120588119892
120572 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1119899 7 4
We non-dimensionalise this model with choice of time radius and pressure in
new scales as follows
119905 = 119905 119905lowast = empty119897 119904 minus empty119897 119903 1205721198981198862120583
1 minus 119898 119896119904120588119892119905lowast 119903 = 119886119903lowast 120583 =
120588119892
120572119901lowast (7 5)
and the dimensionless model with boundary condition becomes by dropping
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 273 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 6)
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 120582119908 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 1 (7 7)
where
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 119901 119878 = minus 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1119899
(7 8)
and dimensionless parameters are
120582119908 =119896119903120588119892119898119886
1 minus 119898 119870119904 119908119894119905119893 119870119904 =
119896119904120588119892
120583 119886119899119889 119901119903 =
119875119903120572
120588119892 (7 9)
Equation (7 1) can also written in term of relative water saturation in the soil
[12] The equation for conservation of water in the soil is thus
120593120597119878
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = minus119865119960 (7 10)
where empty is the (constant) porosity of the soil 119878 is the relative water saturation in the
soil i e 119878 = empty119897empty where empty119897 is the volumetric water fraction 119958 is the volume flux of
water i e Darcy flux and 119865119908 is the uptake of water by plant roots Consider value of
u given in equation (2 7) with equation (2 10) Also the water pressure in the soil
pores can be linked to the relative water saturation via suction characteristic [14]
119901119886 minus 119901 = 119901119888119891 119878 119891 119878 = 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1minus119898
(7 11)
where 119901119886 is atmospheric pressure and 119901119888 is a characteristic suction pressure It is
common to take 119901119886 = 0
Then the Darcy-Richards equation in terms of relative water saturation only it
is written as
empty120597119878
120597119905= nabla 1198630119863 119878 nabla119878 minus 119870119904119870 119878 119948 minus 119865119960 (7 12)
where the water diffusivity in the soil is 1198630119863 119878 =119896
120583
120597119901
120597119878 1198630 =
119901119888119896119904
120583
1minus119898
119898 and
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 (7 13)
Also equation (2 8) can written as follows
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 273 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 6)
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 120582119908 119901 119878 minus 119875119903 119886119905 119903 = 1 (7 7)
where
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 119901 119878 = minus 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1119899
(7 8)
and dimensionless parameters are
120582119908 =119896119903120588119892119898119886
1 minus 119898 119870119904 119908119894119905119893 119870119904 =
119896119904120588119892
120583 119886119899119889 119901119903 =
119875119903120572
120588119892 (7 9)
Equation (7 1) can also written in term of relative water saturation in the soil
[12] The equation for conservation of water in the soil is thus
120593120597119878
120597119905+ nabla 119958 = minus119865119960 (7 10)
where empty is the (constant) porosity of the soil 119878 is the relative water saturation in the
soil i e 119878 = empty119897empty where empty119897 is the volumetric water fraction 119958 is the volume flux of
water i e Darcy flux and 119865119908 is the uptake of water by plant roots Consider value of
u given in equation (2 7) with equation (2 10) Also the water pressure in the soil
pores can be linked to the relative water saturation via suction characteristic [14]
119901119886 minus 119901 = 119901119888119891 119878 119891 119878 = 119878minus1119898 minus 1 1minus119898
(7 11)
where 119901119886 is atmospheric pressure and 119901119888 is a characteristic suction pressure It is
common to take 119901119886 = 0
Then the Darcy-Richards equation in terms of relative water saturation only it
is written as
empty120597119878
120597119905= nabla 1198630119863 119878 nabla119878 minus 119870119904119870 119878 119948 minus 119865119960 (7 12)
where the water diffusivity in the soil is 1198630119863 119878 =119896
120583
120597119901
120597119878 1198630 =
119901119888119896119904
120583
1minus119898
119898 and
119863 119878 = 11987812minus
1119898 1 minus 119878
1119898
minus119898
+ 1 minus 1198781119898
119898
minus 2 (7 13)
Also equation (2 8) can written as follows
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
274 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
119870119904 =120588119892119896119904
120583 (7 14)
Equation (7 12) is studied with boundary condition at soil surface and at the
base of soil layer If amount of water is flowing due to rainfall then we take boundary
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911= 119902119904 119886119905 119911 = 0 (7 15)
where 119902119904 is the volume flux of water per unit soil surface area per unit time If surface
pounding occur then the boundary condition will be 119878 = 1 at 119911 = 0 The boundary
condition at base of soil layer is written as
minus1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119911+ 119870119904119870 119878 = 0 119886119905 119911 = 119897119908 (7 16)
The model for water uptake of a single cylindrical root in cylindrical radial co-
ordinates is written as
empty120597119878
120597119903=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 1198630119863 119878 119903
120597119878
120597119903 (7 17)
with boundary conditions
1198630119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903 = 119896119903 119901 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 119886
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 = 119886119894119899119905 (7 18)
where
p(S) = -119901119888 119878minus1119898 minus 1
1minus119898 (7 19)
119886 is the radius of the root 119886119894119899119905 is a measure of inter branch distance 119896119903 is root radial
conductivity and 119901119903 is the root internal pressure 119875 le 119901119903 le 119901 119878 We take the far-field
soil water content i e effective water saturation is 119878infin which is constant Then the
far-field boundary condition is given by
119878 rarr infin 119886119904 119903 rarr infin
Non-dimensionalizing this model with 119903 = 119886 119905 = empty11988621198630 and 119901119903 = 119875
120597119878
120597119905=
1
119903
120597
120597119903 119903119863 119878
120597119878
120597119903 (7 20)
with boundary conditions
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 275 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
119863 119878 120597119878
120597119903= 120582 minus1205760119891 119878 minus 119901119903 119886119905 119903 = 1
120597119878
120597119903= 0 119886119905 119903 =
119886119894119899119905
119886 (7 21)
where 120582 =119896119903119886 119875
1198630 and 120576 = 119901119888 119875
The far-filed boundary condition is still
119878 rarr infin as 119903 rarr infin
Solution of equation (7 21) is given by [7] for outer region far away from the root
119878 = 119878infin + 119904 = 119878infin + 1198611198641 1199032
4119905119863(119878infin) (7 22)
where S(119903 119905) = 119878infin + 119904(119903 119905) For inner region near the root solution is given by
119878 = 119878infin + 1199041 +120582119908 119901 119878infin minus 119901119903
119863 119878infin 119897119899119903 (7 23)
where 1199041 is 1199041 = minus120582119908 119901 119878infinminus119901119903
2119863 119878infin 119897119899 4119890minus120574119863 119878infin 119905 + 1
Also we have the dimensional expression for water uptake by root from soil
given in equation(7 10) which is written as[8]
119865119908 = 2empty119886119897119889119896119903 minus119901119888119891 119878 minus 119901119903 (7 24)
where 119897119889 is the root length density
8 VAPORIZATION OF WATER THROUGH PLANT LEAVES
Leaf of plant considered as plane at 119911 = 119871 from tip of the root Let 119873119886 is the
number of total opened micro pores of water pathway on the leaves with effective
radius 119903119894 hence effective area of water pathway in plant is 1205871199032 which is actually the
total areas of all micro pores on leaves namely 1205871199031198942119873119886
119894=1 [9][13] The liquid pressure
of the opened pore on the leaves 119901119894119900
is negative It is caused by the transpiration on
the leaves There are two well known theories about 119901119894119900
(1) The liquid in micro pores and air are separated by curved surface due to capillarity
negative 119901119894119900 is generated Suppose 119901119886 is air pressure and 120589 is surface tension
coefficient of liquid then we have 119901119886 minus 119901119894119900 =
120589
119903119894 where 119903119894 is radius of the vessel
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
276 P S AVHALE and S B KIWNE
(2) We start with assumption that liquid and air are separated by a semi permeable
membrane and the fractional pressure of air 119901119886depends on the humidity Suppose the
concentration of water in micro pores is C according the solution theory the
thermodynamic equilibrium condition at the membrane is that the chemical potentials
on both sides of the membrane must be equal One may write 119901119894119900 = 119901119886 + 119901120587 where 119901120587
is the osmotic pressure which depends on the difference of the concentrations
(119862 minus 119901119894119900 119901119886) of the water on the both sides of the membrane
The above condition is applicable for the system that the solutions on the both
sides of the membrane are in the thermodynamics equilibrium If the solution on the
both sides of the membrane are not in the thermodynamics equilibrium then there
exists a difference of pressures โ119901 ne 0 then for first case we have โ119901 = 119901119894119900 minus 119901119886 minus
120589
119903119894 and in second case โ119901 = 119901119894119900
minus 119901119886 + 119901120587 When โ119901 gt 0 the water will vaporize
into air otherwise water in air will enter leaves The flux vaporizing into air can be
expressed as 119902119894 = 119896119894โ119901 where 119896119894 is the osmosis coefficient
9 DISCUSSION
In this paper we try to elaborate the idea of water uptake by plant root which
based on the model discussed by Roose T in his dissertation of doctorate and idea
are extended by different angle using many research paper related to this field We
discussed the mathematical model for plant which is in normal circumstances the
amount of water within a plant is set by a balance between the water uptake through
the roots and the rate of transpiration through the leaves
REFERENCES
[1] Vineet Kumar Sudesh Kumar Yadav Synthesis of variable of shaped goil
nanoparticles in one solution using leaf extract of Bauhinia variegata l Digest
Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures 6(4) 2011 1685-1693
[2] Gangurde A B and Boraste S S Perliminary evalution of bauhinia racemosa
lam caesalpinaceae seed mucilage as tablet binder Int J Pharm 2(1) 80-83
2012
[3] Prasad Rama A linear root water uptake model In Journal of Hydrology 99
(3-4) 1988 297-306
[4] Ritchie J T A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat What
growth and modeling New York 86 1985 293-305
[5] Van Dam J C Huygen J Wesseling J G Feddes R A Kabat P van
Valsum P E V Groenendijk P and van Diepen C A Theory of SWAP
Version 2 0 Simulation of Water Flow Solute Transport and Plant Growth in
the Soil- Water- Atmosphere- Plant Environment TechnicalDocument 45
Wageningen 1997
[6] Bear J Hydraulics of Groundwater McGraw-Hiil 1959
[7] Roose T Mathematical model of plant nutrient uptake Doctor Dissertation
Oxford Linacre College University of Oxford 2000
[8] J Crank The Mathematics of Diffusion Oxford University Press 1975
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608
MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR WATER UPTAKE BY PLANT ROOT 277 IN SATURATED AND UNSATURATED ZONE
[9] Chu Jia Qiang Jiao WeiPing and Jian Jun Mathematical modelling study for
water uptake of steadily growing plant root Sci China Ser G-Phy Mech Astron
vol 51 no 2 2008 184-205
[10] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 173-184
[11] Melvin T Tyree Shudong Yang Pierre Cruiziat and Bronwen Sinclair Novel
Methods of Measuring Hydralic conductivity of tree root Systems
and Interpretation using AMAIZED Plant Physiol 104 1994 189-199
[12] T Roose A C Fowler A mathematical model for water and nutrient uptake by
plant root systems Journal of Theoretical Biology 228 2004 155-171
[13] Vant Hoff J H The role of osmotic pressure in the analogy between solution
and gases Z Phy Chem 1887 481-508
[14] M TH Van Genuchten A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic
conductivity of unsaturated soils Soil Science Society of America Journal 44
1980 892-898
[15] F J Molz Models of water transport in the soil-plant system Water Resources
Research 17(5) 1981 1245-1260
[16] J J Landsberg and N D Fowkes Water movement through plant roots Annals
of Botany 42 1978 493-508
ajm608