Marine microbial communities in UK waters 05 07f

1
Marine microbial communities in UK waters from phylogenetic studies to remote sensing Véronique Créach and Melanie Sapp Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft. www.cefas.co.uk [email protected]; [email protected] Virtual Canonical Correspondence Analysis biplot on DGGE fingerprinting profiles within a gradient of organic carbon using organic carbon (org.C), chlorophyll a (Chl a), depth, macrobenthos and meiobenthos community, grain size, and the nutrients nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2). Circles indicate bacterial communities, and numbers near the symbols indicate the sampling station (2-5). Arrows indicate the direction of increasing values of the respective variable, and the length of arrows indicates the degree of correlation of the variable with community data. Such a plot shows how populations diverge according to the combination of factors affecting them. Acknowledgements We are special grateful to: M. Schratzberger, E. Bell, R. Parker, K. Warr, R.M. Forster, K. Hargins (FSA) and the Cefas plankton laboratory. These works are financed by Cefas Research and Development funding. Virtual MDS Plot of fingerprints of different stations within small-scale spatial variation Stress: 0.27 Differences between sites Similarities within sites Reasons? Benthic microbial communities Unique transformations in biogeochemical cycles Community structure and function affected by eutrophication Study site: Scotland, fish farm; contribution to EU funded project: Coastal Ocean Benthic Observatory • Linkage of changes in bacterial and archaeal communities and appearance of certain phylotypes with enrichment gradient • Specific responses on impact by specific phylotypes or functional groups? Eutrophication Increased rate of organic matter supply to an ecosystem due to - Inorganic nutrient enrichment - Input of allochthonous organic carbon or pollutants (e.g. fish farming) - Decrease in water turbidity - Decline in grazing pressure - Other factors Proliferation and toxicity increase of harmful algal blooms Hypoxia and anoxia Altered routes/fluxes of organic and inorganic matter cycling Disruption of food webs Impacts on biogeochemical cycling and trophic relationships Influence of ecological factors on assemblages and scale of variation Prediction of community change between areas Study site: Oyster Ground, North Sea, 54°4’ N / 4°’ E; • Small scale variation of bacterial and archaeal communities • Link to variation in multicellular ecosystem components and habitat characteristics • Prediction of community patterns by quality and quantity of carbon sources? Sediment • Heterogeneous environment, local habitat characteristics • Prevention of dispersal Biogeography • Physical environmental conditions large scale patterns • Food sources, local disturbances (natural or man-made) small scale patterns Benthic microbial communities Diversity of communities and distribution of species Ecological roles Impact consequences Response of microbial communities to natural and man-made impacts The diversity of benthic bacterial and archaeal communities is being studied at Cefas, utilising different fingerprinting methods. Fingerprinting methods are combined with multivariate statistics to study the response of these communities to environmental changes induced naturally or by human activity. The statistical methods include nonmetric multidimensional scaling (MDS) and Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to clarify how specific communities and specific microbial phylotypes respond to changes in their environment. The sea provides many goods and services (e.g. food, recreation, etc.). There is a need to safeguard the marine ecosystem and to achieve sustainability in respect of human use. Knowing the main human pressures and understanding their impacts is essential to develop and implement effective measures of environmental quality. Generally, the state of an ecosystem can be assessed by monitoring its components and/or attributes. Parameters such as overall system performance are also highly relevant but are neither precise nor easy to measure. State and impact indicators are therefore utilised widely in global and regional assessments and have proven useful in detecting and quantifying deteriorating environmental quality so that appropriate management action may be taken. INTRODUCTION Monitoring Phytoplankton included the harmful algae Following the Water Framework Directive, and other legislation, phytoplankton biomass is regularly measured in UK waters. Chlorophyll a extraction has now been combined with remote detection of blooms from buoys and satellite. These new approaches have the advantage of being independent of the sampling network and allow the dynamics of phytoplankton blooms to be followed directly on different geographical scales. Furthermore, other techniques to estimate the biodiversity of the phytoplankton composition, including toxic and non toxic algae, is now taking place to support the traditional identification by light microscopy. APPLIED SCIENCE IN AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY AT Cefas 0 5.e 5 Bigbury Brixham Camel Fal Plymouth Weymouth 8/29/2006 8/23/2006 8/22/2006 8/21/2006 8/7/2006 8/1/2006 7/31/2006 7/25/2006 7/24/2006 6/20/2006 6/14/2006 6/12/2006 6/6/2006 6/5/2006 5/23/2006 5/22/2006 5/9/2006 5/8/2006 5/2/2006 Sum of Pseudo-nitzschia spp. Date Sample Collected Number of cells per liter sites 10.e 5 15.e 5 20.e 5 25.e 5 30.e 5 Main sites of Pseudo-nitzschia blooms in UK waters in 2006 Research and development on Pseudo- nitzschia, domoic acid producer (cause of amnesiac shellfish poisoning) In UK coastal waters, during the last 2 years, the monitoring programme has shown an increase in numbers, distribution areas and bloom periods of Pseudo-nitzschia sp. The species composition of this diatom has been rarely studied. Molecular tools (ARISA, clone libraries, flow cytometry) are being developed to identify the different species using fixed samples from monitoring programmes around the UK coast and from SmartBuoys (North Sea, Liverpool Bay). Additionally, new strains during occasional cruises are regularly isolated to study the population genetic of Pseudo-nitzschia pungens in collaboration with the Department of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, University of Ghent (Dr. Vywerman, G. Casteleyn). n m n m n m n m n m Warp A1221 WestG Oyster NorthDogger 9°E 9°E 8°E 8°E 7°E 7°E 6°E 6°E 5°E 5°E 4°E 4°E 3°E 3°E 2°E 2°E 1°E 1°E 1°W 1°W 2°W 2°W 3°W 3°W 59°N 59 58°N 58 57°N 57 56°N 56 55°N 55 54°N 54 53°N 53 52°N 52 51°N 51 Ecosystem Connections Legend n m Cefas_SmartBuoy.txt Events Legend chlorophyll_a_20070326.tif Value High : 10.000000 Low : 0.000000 Remote sensing image of a phytoplankton bloom in the North Sea in March 2007 Communities Communities Communities Species Level studied Molecular biology Molecular biology Molecular biology Flow cytometry Remote sensing Analytical tools No No Yes Regular monitoring ? ? Yes Indicative of ecosystem changes ? High High Importance for ecosystem status Archaea Bacteria Phytoplankton

Transcript of Marine microbial communities in UK waters 05 07f

Page 1: Marine microbial communities in UK waters 05 07f

Marine microbial communities in UK watersfrom phylogenetic studiesto remote sensing

Véronique Créach and Melanie Sapp

Centre for Environment, Fisheries &

Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft. www.cefas.co.uk

[email protected]; [email protected]

Virtual Canonical Correspondence Analysis biplot onDGGE fingerprinting profiles within a gradient of organic carbon

using organic carbon (org.C), chlorophyll a (Chl a), depth, macrobenthosand meiobenthos community, grain size, and the nutrients nitrate (NO3),

nitrite (NO2). Circles indicate bacterial communities, and numbers near the symbols indicate the sampling station (2-5). Arrows indicate the direction of

increasing values of the respective variable, and the length of arrows indicates the degree of correlation of the variable with community data.

Such a plot shows how populations diverge according to the combination of factors affecting them.

AcknowledgementsWe are special grateful to: M. Schratzberger, E. Bell, R. Parker, K. Warr, R.M. Forster, K. Hargins (FSA) and the Cefas plankton laboratory. These works are financed by Cefas Research and Development funding.

Virtual MDS Plot of fingerprints of different stations within small-scale spatial variation

Stress: 0.27

Differences between sites

Similarities within sites

Reasons?

Benthic microbial communities

Unique transformations in biogeochemical cycles

Community structure and function affected by eutrophication

Study site: Scotland, fish farm; contribution to EU funded

project: Coastal Ocean Benthic Observatory

• Linkage of changes in bacterial and archaeal communities and

appearance of certain phylotypes with enrichment gradient

• Specific responses on impact by specific phylotypes or

functional groups?

Eutrophication

Increased rate of organic matter supply to an ecosystem due to

- Inorganic nutrient enrichment

- Input of allochthonous organic carbon or pollutants

(e.g. fish farming)

- Decrease in water turbidity

- Decline in grazing pressure

- Other factors

� Proliferation and toxicity increase of harmful algal blooms

� Hypoxia and anoxia

� Altered routes/fluxes of organic and inorganic matter cycling

� Disruption of food webs

� Impacts on biogeochemical cycling and trophic relationships

Influence of ecological factors on assemblages and scale of variation� Prediction of community change between areas

Study site: Oyster Ground, North Sea, 54°4’ N / 4°’ E;

• Small scale variation of bacterial and archaeal communities

• Link to variation in multicellular ecosystem components and

habitat characteristics

• Prediction of community patterns by quality and quantity of

carbon sources?

Sediment

• Heterogeneous environment, local habitat characteristics

• Prevention of dispersal � Biogeography

• Physical environmental conditions � large scale patterns

• Food sources, local disturbances (natural or man-made)

� small scale patterns

Benthic microbial communities

Diversity of communities and distribution of species

� Ecological roles

� Impact consequences

Response of microbial communities to natural and man-made impacts

The diversity of benthic bacterial and archaeal communities is being studied at Cefas, utilising different fingerprinting methods. Fingerprinting methods are combined with multivariate statistics to study the response of these communities to environmental changes induced naturally or by human activity. The statistical methods include nonmetric multidimensional scaling (MDS) and Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to clarify how specific communities and specific microbial phylotypesrespond to changes in their environment.

The sea provides many goods and services (e.g. food, recreation, etc.). There is a

need to safeguard the marine ecosystem and to achieve sustainability in respect of

human use. Knowing the main human pressures and understanding their impacts

is essential to develop and implement effective measures of environmental quality.

Generally, the state of an ecosystem can be assessed by monitoring its

components and/or attributes. Parameters such as overall system performance are

also highly relevant but are neither precise nor easy to measure. State and impact

indicators are therefore utilised widely in global and regional assessments and

have proven useful in detecting and quantifying deteriorating environmental

quality so that appropriate management action may be taken.

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring Phytoplankton included the harmful algae

Following the Water Framework Directive, and other legislation, phytoplankton biomass is regularly measured in UK waters. Chlorophyll a extraction has now been combined with remote detection of blooms from buoys and satellite. These new approaches have the advantage of being independent of the sampling network and allow the dynamics of phytoplankton blooms to be followed directly on different geographical scales. Furthermore, other techniques to estimate the biodiversity of the phytoplankton composition, including toxic and non toxic algae, is now taking place to support the traditional identification by light microscopy.

APPLIED SCIENCE IN AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY AT Cefas

0

5.e5

Bigbury Brixham Camel Fal Plymouth Weymouth

8/29/2006

8/23/2006

8/22/2006

8/21/2006

8/7/2006

8/1/2006

7/31/2006

7/25/2006

7/24/2006

6/20/2006

6/14/2006

6/12/2006

6/6/2006

6/5/2006

5/23/2006

5/22/2006

5/9/2006

5/8/2006

5/2/2006

Sum of Pseudo-nitzschia spp.

Date Sample Collected

Nu

mb

er

of

cells

per

lite

r

sites

10.e5

15.e5

20.e5

25.e5

30.e5

Main sites of Pseudo-nitzschia blooms in UK waters in 2006

Research and development on Pseudo-nitzschia, domoic acid producer (cause of amnesiac shellfish poisoning)In UK coastal waters, during the last 2 years, the monitoring programme has shown an increase in numbers, distribution areas and bloom periods of Pseudo-nitzschia sp. The species composition of this diatom has been rarely studied. Molecular tools (ARISA, clone libraries, flow cytometry) are being developed to identify the different species using fixed samples from monitoring programmes around the UK coast and from SmartBuoys(North Sea, Liverpool Bay). Additionally, new strains during occasional cruises are regularly isolated to study the population genetic of Pseudo-nitzschia pungens in collaboration with the Department of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, University of Ghent (Dr. Vywerman, G. Casteleyn).

nm

nm

nm

nm

nm

Warp

A1221

WestG

Oyster

NorthDogger

9°E

9°E

8°E

8°E

7°E

7°E

6°E

6°E

5°E

5°E

4°E

4°E

3°E

3°E

2°E

2°E

1°E

1°E

1°W

1°W

2°W

2°W

3°W

3°W

59°N 59°N

58°N 58°N

57°N 57°N

56°N 56°N

55°N 55°N

54°N 54°N

53°N 53°N

52°N 52°N

51°N 51°N

EcosystemConnections

Legend

nm Cefas_SmartBuoy.txt Events

Legend

chlorophyll_a_20070326.tif

Value

High : 10.000000

Low : 0.000000

Remote sensing image of a phytoplankton bloom in the North Sea in March 2007

CommunitiesCommunitiesCommunities

Species

Level studied

Molecular biologyMolecular biology

Molecular biology

Flow cytometry

Remote sensing

Analytical tools

NoNoYesRegular monitoring

??YesIndicative of ecosystem changes

?HighHighImportance for ecosystem status

ArchaeaBacteriaPhytoplankton