Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0...

27
Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data Krista Amolins David Coleman, Yun Zhang, Peter Dare University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB ASPRS 2011

Transcript of Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0...

Page 1: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

Mapping solar potential obstructions

using LiDAR dataKrista Amolins

David Coleman, Yun Zhang, Peter DareUniversity of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB

ASPRS 2011

Page 2: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Sunlight in Milwaukee

2

Sunrise, sunset, dawn and dusk times Sun path

Dec 21

Jun 21

May 1

Image Source: http://www.gaisma.com

Page 3: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/16

Insolation, in kWh/m2/day

3

0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee

Source: NASA Langley Research Center Atmospheric Science Data Center, via http://www.gaisma.com

If could capture and convert 100% of the solar radiation hitting a 1 m2 area on May 3:- power 5 100 W light bulbs for 10 hours- make 25 pots of coffee- dry 1 load of laundry

BUT high efficiency solar panels convert only 18%

Page 4: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

http://geonb.snb.ca/geonb/N

Sun angles December 21

rise 124°set 236°

max elev 20.7°

Limited Solar Potential

Fredericton, NB, Canada

Worst CaseBest Case:

Obstructions...

Page 5: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

LiDARpoint cloud

solid surface

worst case obstructions

solid object points

best case obstructions

Workflow for Mapping Obstructions

5

LiDARpoint cloud

Refinements...

Page 6: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

LiDAR Point Cloud

6

50 m

Data collected November 2007 ➙ leaf-offUp to four returns per pulse; most last returns from ground

Page 7: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Solid Surface

750 m

Grid resolution 1 mSimple filtering: last returns.Contains ground, buildings, evergreen trees and hedges, cars, some artefacts from deciduous trees.

Page 8: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

• Worst case means: on the shortest day, when the sun does not reach a high elevation, will sunlight reach the surface?

• Compare LiDAR points to surface cells: are objects obstructing the sun at any time?

Worst Case Obstructions

8

Page 9: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Worst Case Obstructions

9

LiDAR Point Cloud Solid Surface

Page 10: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Worst Case Obstructions

9

LiDAR Point Cloud Solid Surface

Sun angles December 21

rise 124°set 236°

max elev 20.7°

Page 11: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Worst Case Obstructions

9

LiDAR Point Cloud Solid Surface

Sun angles December 21

rise 124°set 236°

max elev 20.7°

Page 12: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

LiDARpoint cloud

solid surface

worst case obstructions

solid object points

best case obstructions

Workflow for Mapping Obstructions

10

solid object points

Refinements...

Page 13: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Solid Object Points

11

Data collected May 2006 ➙ leaf-onPoints classified using intensity, local density, and local variation in height

Page 14: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Solid Object Points

11

Non-solid Objects

Data collected May 2006 ➙ leaf-onPoints classified using intensity, local density, and local variation in height

Page 15: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

• Best case means: (on the shortest day)are any of the obstructions not solid objects?

• Compare only solid object LiDAR points to surface cells: are objects obstructing the sun at any time?

Best Case Obstructions

12

Page 16: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Best Case Obstructions

13

Greyscale: Solid surfacePink: Non-solid Object Points

Sun angles December 21

rise 124°set 236°

max elev 20.7°

Page 17: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Greyscale: Solid surfacePink: Non-solid Object Points

Best Case Obstructions

14

Page 18: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Best Case Obstructions

14

Non-solid Objects Included

Page 19: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Best Case Obstructions

14

Non-solid Objects Included Non-solid Objects Excluded

Page 20: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

LiDARpoint cloud

solid surface

worst case obstructions

solid object points

best case obstructions

Workflow for Mapping Obstructions

15

Refinements...

Page 21: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Refinements - Directional

16

Greyscale: Solid surfaceGreen: Non-solid Object Points

East

South

West

Page 22: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Refinements - Directional

16

Greyscale: Solid surfaceGreen: Non-solid Object Points

East

South

West

Page 23: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Refinements - Directional

17

Greyscale: Solid surface

East

South

West

Page 24: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Refinements - Directional

17

Greyscale: Solid surface

East

South

West

Page 25: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Recap

18

• Renewable energy sources, e.g., solar

• Low insolation in winter

• Filter LiDAR data: ground (solid surface) and obstructions (everything)

• Classify LiDAR data: solid objects (not trees, power lines...)

• Analyze obstruction direction, seasonal solar variations to refine results

Page 26: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

/20

Further Work• Apply better filtering methods

• Smooth solid surfaces

• Quantitative assessment of results

• Improve classification

• Separate trees from power lines

• Locate building edges

• Apply to vertical surfaces19

Page 27: Mapping solar potential obstructions using LiDAR data · /16 Insolation, in kWh/m2/day 3 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 J F M A M J J A S O N D Fredericton Iqaluit Milwaukee Source: NASA Langley

Thank You!