Many thanks to our sponsor

Welcome

Alex BristolCANSO Chairman OSC &

CEO, skyguide

Welcome

Gus NezerCANSO Vice-Chairman OSC & Service Center Director, ATO

Central Service CenterFAA

Achievements, Partnerships,

Priorities looking forward

Greg RussellCANSO Champion OSC &CEO, Airservices Australia

• Collaborative Decision Making

• Flexible routings

• SID/STAR phraseology

• Aviation System Block Upgrade (ASBU)

• OSC restructure completed

Achievements…

• Multiple Environmental Best

Practice Papers

• AIS to AIM transition

• Joint CANSO / Boeing report

Achievements…

Accelerating ATM efficiency: A Call to Industry

• PBN Go Team Agreement

• Civil-Military cooperation

• Flight Plan 2012 implementation

• Supporting ICAO in IFSET rollout

• ICAO AIS transition to AIM

Successful partnerships

Future priorities – global ATM collaboration

• Flight Plan 2012

• 12th Air Navigation Conference – November 2012

• Air Transport Action Group Summit – March 2012

• Continued partnerships with key stakeholders

• Support for OSC Work Programme

CANSO Update

Samantha SharifDirector Industry Affairs

CANSO

Partnering to Transform ATM

Performance

Robert EaglesDirector Infrastructure

ImplementationIATA

Partnering to Transform ATM

Performance

David GamperDirector, Safety / Technical &

AdministrationACI

ACI represents Airport Operators

563 members, which operate 1643 airports in 178 countries and territories: over 95% of the world’s passenger traffic

Europe: 193 members, 417 airports

Asia-Pacific: 95 members, 418 airports

Africa: 51 members, 174 airports

North America: 175 members, 377 airports

Latin America-Caribbean: 59 members, 194 airports

ACI’s missionACI advances the collective interests of the world’s

airports and promotes professional excellence in airport management and operations, for the benefit of passengers and the industry as a wholeAirports are becoming service providers, instead of

just infrastructure providers

Six priority areas Safety Security Customer service

Environment Economic development Efficiency

ACI’s strategic objective # 1

“Maximize the contribution of airports to maintain & develop a safe, secure and viable aviation industry, in a responsible and sustainable way”

ACI and Industry Safety

• Development of Best Practices

• Knowledge Transfer• Publication of ACI Handbooks

• ACI Global Training

• ACI Conferences and Seminars

• ICAO Conferences, Panels etc

• Other International Organizations

• APEX in Safety - a new programme

16

17

ACI Best Practice Handbooks

Partnership Work Areas

1. A strategic approach to safety – helping our members to reach the highest level

2. Major safety risks that involve ANSPs and Airports

ACI APEX programme SMS implementation Global Aviation Safety

Roadmap – regional implementation

Runway Excursions Runway Incursions Data-driven priorities

Partnership Work Areas (2)

3. ATM modernization –Block Upgrades

4. Airport Collaborative Decision Making

5. Safe RunwayOperations

Future systems such as NextGen, SESAR, and closer Airspace/ATM integration at airports

Implementation Manual

Airport Lighting, Markings and Signs

Runway Friction FOD and Wildlife

Runway Safety – major problems

ExcursionsExcursions (over-

runs and veer-offs on landing and take-off) are at an annual rate of about 30, and about 2 of these involve fatalities.

IncursionsIncursions are

showing a very low level worldwide (less than one accident involving substantial damage per year).

Runway Excursions : successful partnership

participants included:ACICANSOEASAEurocontrolFAAIATAICCAIAIFALPAIFATCANTSBand others

• ICAO focus on helping States to reduce accidents, working with industry partners

• ICAO Global Runway Safety Symposium in May 2011 and has held two of a series of regional events on runway safety

• All Aviation Stakeholders participating

• ACI can contribute to solutions, especially through convening/

hosting/coordinating Runway Safety TeamsThe ICAO/IATA Runway Excursion Risk Reduction Toolkit second edition was published in May 2011

22

Focus on Runway Safety

STATE(CAA)

Airlines/Pilots

Air Navigation service provider/Controllers

Airport operators and staff

Coordination between partners

Adequate coordination between

all partners is essential for safety!

PBN

Shows promise to improve safety and efficiency (reduced emissions, delays)

But we must not forget noise exposure remains a major problem and limits airport capacity

So new routes in terminal airspace need to be planned with the airport operator and the communities

Dialogue needs to involve the three parties: airport operator, airlines and air navigation service provider

ACI, IATA and CANSO will work together and already assist implementation of PBN

Airport Collaborative Decision Making- Airports are facing challenges

Capacity constraintsCongestionAircraft DelaysIncreased Carbon emissionsManaging Real-time airport operationsIrregular Operations

The situation is likely to get worsewith projected trafficgrowth

Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) is needed to overcome these

challenges

Airport

Regional

Inter-regional

Stages in CDM Evolution

Stand-alone A-CDMAirside

Landside / Airside integration

Inflight CDM

Regionally integrated A-CDM

Inflight CDMICAO - System Wide Information Management (SWIM)

ACI EuropeEUROCONTR

OLA-CDMProject

ICAOFuture

Aviation Challenge

Team(FACT)

ICAOAviation

System Block Upgrades

SESAR(Europe)

NEXT GEN(US)

Existing initiatives Relating to enhancing air space management

(which will likely rely on CDM enabled solutions)

1st.

2nd.

3rd.

Characteristics

• Purpose: Practical assistance to ACI members to improve their level of safety

• Team visits the airport• “Safety partner” airport(s) provide staff to assist• Optional participants: ACI staff and ICAO and national

civil aviation authority• Pilot projects underway• Next phase to start in fourth quarter 2012

27

APEX Safety Review Process

• Infrastructure - compliance• Aerodrome Certification• Aerodrome services and operational safety

procedures• Airport operator’s Safety Management

Systems• SMS for third party operators

28

Scope of APEX Safety Review

• Aerodrome reporting and access to the movement area• Aerodrome emergency plan and rescue and fire-fighting services• Inspection of the movement area and visual aids• Apron safety management and airside vehicle control• Wildlife hazard management• Hazardous material management• Protection of radar and navigational aids

29

Scope of APEX Safety Review continued

Leading, representing and serving the global airport community

www.aci.aero

dgamper@aci.aero

Partnering to Transform 

ATM PerformanceEugene Hoeven

Director ICAO Affairs

“To provide a global platform for customer and stakeholder driven 

civil Air Navigation Services (ANS), with paramount emphasis on the provision of safe, efficient 

and cost effective service”

CANSO Mission

CANSO Vision

CANSO's Global Vision identifies the areas of 

change needed within the regulatory and operational domains, as well as the 

issues we must address if we are to achieve a truly global 

ATM system

Technological Change

Institutional Change

Operations

“Improving global ANS provision and 

performance through a 

collaborative industry effort” 

Towards a Collaborative Approach

Characteristics of Good Partnership

A Project Management Approach

I. INITIATE

II. PLAN

III. EXECUTE

IV. MONITOR

V. CONCLUDE

We are a service industry after all….

2011 Achievements

Glynn Turner VACANTLockheed Martin

8-9 March 2012

ATM Services HarmonisationWork Group (ASH-WG)

ASH‐WG New Structure

VACANT

ICAO FP2012 SGLeads: Brendan Kelly – UK NATA and Tony Coult – Jeppeson

FP2012 SG facilitating a task force to help members understand FP changes, identify system requirements and identify solutions

Continued to promote awareness, validate readiness and identify concerns reference the ICAO 2012 FP changes with CANSO members

Hosted a successful Flight Plan Systems Vendor Conference on behalf CANSO and ICAO in Dec 2011 at NATS Prestwick

Conference brought ANSPs, Airline Operators and Industry vendors together to discuss products, implementation and progress

FP2012SG will continue to work with CANSO membership, ICAO and IATA through 2012 to ensure successful transition in November 2012

Procedures/Phraseology Harmonisation SGLeads: Akos van der Plaat - LVNLSID/STAR Phraseology Clark Desing – FAA and Mark Watson- Thales

Standardisation of SID/STAR Climb/Descent Phraseology activity completed in 2011 Team validated findings with OSC/DG, presented ICAO ANC President

with recommendations and OSC briefed ANC Oct11 ANC/ANB now working this to a conclusion

PBN team representing OSC on tripartite PBN Go Team Providing liaison between ANSPs and ICAO/IATA/CANSO Go Team Participated in DFS visit Nov11

PBN team will continue to gather data from visits and support further ANSP visits

Aviation System Block Upgrade SGLeads: Matt Riley - Serco, Dubai ATM & Bob Humbertson - MITRE CAASD

Concentrated mainly on providing an education campaign and facilitating a feedback forum

Provided CANSO input to ICAO ASBU activities, the 2011 GANIS conference and provided CANSO membership of the ICAO ASBU Technical Team

SG will now: Focus on identifying ‘showstoppers’ that could derail future progress Provide voice to influence ICAO thinking as move to ANC12 and beyond Develop CANSO response to ICAO State Letter reference ANC12 Produce a CANSO position paper for ANC12 Act as coarse filter to review ANC12 papers and highlight issues/concerns

Flight Efficiency SG ‐ 1Leads: Greg McDonald – ASA and Stuart Ratcliffe/Dave Rome - Metron

Flexible Routes (iFLEX) project is a collaboration between IATA, ICAO & CANSO Focused on 2 City pair routes – Atlanta-Johannesburg & Dubai-Sao Paulo Sep11 IATA/CANSO announced initial success and implementation of flexible

routing for ATL-GCJ Work commenced on DXB-GRU in Nov11 – working benefit analysis Initial analysis being carried out for 3rd route (London Heathrow-Singapore) Analysis for LHR-SIN expected to take approx 1 year

As we move forward IATA will continue to identify future pairs and OSC (FE SG) will facilitate implementation of the studies

Flight Efficiency SG ‐ 2Leads: Greg McDonald – ASA and Stuart Ratcliffe/Dave Rome - Metron

CDM/AFTN Held 2 meetings in 2011 and met again in Feb 2012 Agreed to pursue a CDM process for the city pair of Singapore – Bangkok Relatively simple pairing which allow concentration on process and not issues Goal is to produce a re-usable model for the region (global?) and not just for

this city pair Latest CDM/AFTN meeting held Feb12 City Pair CDM Operational Trials will be carried out mid-2012

Best Practices Discussions are in preliminary stages for the next Best Practices workshop –

possibly South Africa, date to be confirmed

Collaborative Airspace Working Group

Co‐Chairs:J. Scott DeHart, FAAMike Paone, Boeing 

Collaborative Airspace Working Group: Structure

CAWG Co‐Chairs:Scott DeHart, FAAMike Paone, Boeing

UAS Task Force Co‐Chairs:Thomas Klein, DFS

Doug Davis, New Mexico State University

Civ / Mil Task Force Co‐Chairs:

Scott Dehart, FAAMike Paone, Boeing

UAS Task Force Status

Doug Davis representing CANSO on ICAO UAS study groupCreate joint ICAO/CANSO UAS best practices paperCreate white paper for ANC‐12 Create CANSO UAS integration position statement

UAS Task Force Status

CANSO UAS position statement:The advent of Unmanned Aircraft (UA's) or Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA's) has placed Air Navigation Service Providers in a familiar position, that of accommodating new, and potentially unproven, technology.  Air Traffic Controllers have historically risen to the challenge to continue to provide access to all airspace users in a non‐discriminating manner.  UA's and RPA's are no different, and while these aircraft may pose unique challenges, CANSO believes they can and should be accommodated.  CANSO will be the lead ANSP advocate in collaborating with the international industry and regulatory stakeholders to develop the necessary international UAS standards and recommended practices that will ensure the safe, efficient and cost‐effective integration of UA/RPA operations within non‐segregated airspace

Civ / Mil Task Force Status

Develop FUA best practices paperCo‐host FUA workshops with ICAO

Lima, August 2011 Bangkok, February 28‐March 1Cairo, September 

Asia/Pacific Civil/Military Cooperation Seminar/WorkshopBangkok, Thailand, 28 February to 1 March 2012

Civ / Mil Conference, Bangkok 

J. Scott DeHart – CANSO/FAA Civil/Military Co‐Lead

28 February to 1 March 2012

Asia/Pacific Civil/Military Cooperation Seminar/Workshop

69 attendees, representing civil and military aviation from the following countries and organizations:

New Zealand Australia CambodiaChina Thailand IndonesiaSingapore Malaysia IndiaJapan United States Sri LankaBangladesh Philippines ICAOIFALPA IATA IAOPAUVS International Euro Control

Civ / Mil Conference, Bangkok 

28 February to 1 March 2012

Asia/Pacific Civil/Military Cooperation Seminar/Workshop

International Civil Aviation Organization

• ICAO Framework for Civil Military Cooperation• Why Should Civil/Military Cooperate?• Civil/Military cooperation in Air Traffic• Best Practices – in Civil/Military coordination and communication• UAS/UAV – current/future challenges and opportunities

Civ / Mil Conference, Bangkok 

• Fundamentals of Good Communication

• Introduction to elements of good communication• Practical exercise to enhance common understanding of civil/military cooperation

• Static Airspace Plan Workshop

• Develop airspace plan reflecting civil/militaryRequirements

• Dynamic Airspace Plan Workshop

• Develop actual airspace plan for daily operations

ICAO/CANSO Workshop

Workshop Goals/Outcomes:

1. Reversed Roles ‐ Civil/Military

2. Reduce barriers to effective communication

3. Encourage greater communication, understanding,and cooperation between Civil/Military

4.  Encourage use of FUA/Dynamic Airspace

International Civil Aviation Organization

• ICAO requests continued CANSO cooperationand support on workshops

• ICAO welcomes future joint ICAO/CANSO seminars and/or meetings

AIS to AIM Work GroupUpdate Spring 2012

Barry C. Davis

ICAO Study Group

ICAO AIS‐AIM Study Group ‐ Introduction

• Established by the Air Navigation Commission, on 20 March 2008;

• To assist the Secretariat with the development of: • a global strategy/roadmap for the transition from Aeronautical 

Information Services (AIS) to Aeronautical Information Management (AIM);

• Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) and guidance material related to the provision of a standard aeronautical information conceptual model and standard aeronautical information exchange model to enable the global exchange of data in digital format; and other SARPs, guidance material and training material necessary to support AIM implementation. 

Study Group Objectives

• To establish the global strategy and roadmap to achieve the global uniform digital data exchange;

• The main topics of the Agenda:• AIS to AIM transition roadmap;• Annex amendment proposals;• PANS AIM;• Guidance materials;• Legal and institutional issues;• Interoperability with meteorological products and services.

CANSO Role

• Actively participate/contribute on the AIS AIM SG’s activities and to support the strategic framework and roadmap developments as well as updates of all relevant documents;

• Identify and share best practices to implement above mentioned globally approved developments into operation;

• Continuously provide feedback to ICAO to support appropriate update/modification of strategic framework/roadmap and all relevant documents.

CANSO´s Involvement

Actions already tackled:

Draft Amendments to Annex 15 – Gregory, Augustín;

PANS AIM – Gregory, Augustín;

Global AIM operational concept and roadmap – Augustín;Guidance material on AIM training – Joachim, Gregory, Augustín;

AIS quality manual – Rafal, Augustín;Annex 4 & Aeronautical Chart Manual (Doc 8697) – Peter, Augustín;

Legal and Institutional issues – Kelly‐Ann, Eugene;

Business Model

The AIM Business Model

InformationServices

InformationServices

Future AIM Operational concepts

AIS to AIM

Future State

The Transition to Services

Figure9:Correlationbetweenthetemporalityofinformationandwhetherornotitturnsintoaninformationproductoraninformationservice.From ICAO – Future Operational Concept Draft Version 0.9 (Alexander Pufahl)

Meetings

Meetings

• November 2011• ICAO AIS to AIM Study Group (Montreal, Canada)

• January 2012• Steering Committee Meeting (Brisbane, Australia)

• March 2012• Work Group Meeting (Amsterdam)

• May 2012• AIM Workshop (Geneva, Switzerland)

• September 2012• Work Group Meeting (TBD)

• October 2012• Work Group Meeting Cape Town

• January 2013 (Postponed from Nov 2012 because of ANC12)• ICAO AIS to AIM Study Group (Montreal, Canada)

Questions

Agenda 2011 – 2016 (1)Date(s)/Timeframe Event/

Milestone Work Deliverables

2011

20-23 Sep GANIS) oDraft AIM Conceptodraft AIM Roadmap (later part of GANP)oAnnex15 and PANS-AIM/Guidance framework

7-11 Nov AIS-AIMSG#5 Finalised Amendment 37

Q3/Q4 oTraining Manual oQuality Manual oAIS Manual v3 oWGS-84 Manual (accuracy & heighting) oManual on Public Usage of the Internet oTOD Manual

2012

1 Apr Final ANC-12 papers including final AIM Conceptand final AIM Roadmap

21 - 25 May AIS-AIMSG#6

Q2/ Charting Manual update

19-30 Nov ANC-12

Agenda 2011 – 2016 (2)

Date(s)/Timeframe Event/milestone Work Deliverables

2013

14-18 Jan AIS-AIMSG#7(location TBD)

Updated AIS to AIM transition roadmap

Nov Annex 15 Amendment 37 applicable

2014Jun AIM/MET

Divisional Meeting

Nov Finalised Amendment 38

2016

Nov Annex 15 Amendment 38 applicable & PANS-AIM introduced

Operational Performance Working Group

Co‐Chairs:John Gulding, FAA(To be Filled) 

Operational Performance

Focus on performance is everywhere for the ANSP

ICAO Key Performance Areas

Airline Punctuality

Targets for ANSP’s

NEXTGEN, SESAR  What will improve?

Interdependencies

Operational Performance – CANSO Structure

Executive Committee

Operations Standing Committee

Policy Standing Committee

Safety Standing Committee

Environment

Operational Performance 

Global Benchmarking

Shared Metric and Performance Responsibility

Operational Performance Objectives

Define the role of ANSP’s in the ATM Value Chain

Collect best practice information for ANSP

Promote Recommended Metrics

Provide Guidance for: Assessing capacity (capacity declaration) in all phases of flight

Provide information sharing among ANSP’s on Performance

Operational Performance Examples

Throughput Efficiency

Flight Efficiency

ATM Adjusted NAS On‐Time

Metrics on System Readiness 

Operational Performance Next Steps

Need to define the value CANSO adds to process

Performance may be a sensitive subject

Review process/environment of participating CANSO members

Formalize group participation

Collect information on Operational Performance 

Define Concrete products for CANSO

EnvironmentalWorking Group

Co‐Chairs

Dave Knorr, FAA

Gabor Nemes, Hungarocontrol

Environment WG Key Focus Areas

Whitepapers• Best Practices: Performance Measurement• Interdependencies  Impacting ATM Goal Setting• Best Practices: Noise and ATM Efficiency• Best Practices: Managing Terminal Area Efficiency with 

Speed Control in Cruise

Joint CANSO/Boeing report “Accelerating ATM Efficiency Improvements: A Call to Action”

Environmental Award• “Collaboration is the Biofuel of ATM Efficiency”

CANSO Environment Working Group

Future Meetings and Contact Info

• Geneva March 19th to 20th• Prague July 2nd to 4th• Meeting at ATNS October 2012

Dave KnorrDave.knorr@faa.gov