Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.
-
Upload
annabel-gardner -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.
![Page 1: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Managing Air Quality in Indian Country
Rich McAllisterUS EPA Region 10
![Page 2: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Overview
Getting Started Tribal inherent authority “Treatment in the same manner
as a State” or “TAS”
Federal Implementation Delegation
![Page 3: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Getting Started with Funding to Assess
Indian General Assistance Program
Sec. 103 of the CAAAssess air qualityInventory emissions and
identify problems
![Page 4: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
The Inherent Authority of Tribes
Indian tribes were independent, self-governing societies long before contact with European nations
The U.S. recognizes tribes as “distinct, independent political communities” qualified to exercise powers of self-government by reason of their original tribal sovereignty
![Page 5: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Reserved Rights DoctrineReserved Rights Doctrine
“In sum, Indian tribes still possess those aspects of sovereignty not withdrawn by treaty or statute, or by implication as a necessary result of their dependent status.”
U.S. v. Wheeler (1978)
![Page 6: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
The Jurisdiction of Tribes
Authority to protect tribal self-government and to control internal relations
Subject to plenary power of Congress (may be unilateral)
Authority over nonmembers as granted or delegated by Congress
Inherent authority to regulate nonmember conduct is limited
![Page 7: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Enforcement of Tribal Requirements
Key issue: Does the Tribe wish to establish civil requirements under Tribal law enforced against both members and nonmembers in Tribal Court?
Requires both Tribal Regulatory and Tribal Adjudicatory jurisdiction
![Page 8: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Montana v. United States 450 U.S. 544 (1981)
In general, absent express authorization by federal statute or treaty, a Tribe’s inherent power over nonmember activity on fee lands within a reservation does not reach beyond what is necessary to protect tribal self-government or to control internal relations
![Page 9: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
The Montana Test Exceptions
(1) Consensual relationships, or (2) The conduct of non-Indians on fee lands within the reservation when that conduct “threatens or has some direct effect on the political integrity, the economic security, or the health or welfare of the tribe.”
![Page 10: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Evolving Caselaw
Nevada v. Hicks
121 S. Ct 2304 (2001).
A tribal court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate a tribal member’s civil claims against a state game warden who was executing a search warrant on tribal reservation lands for alleged off-reservation crimes
![Page 11: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Nevada v. Hicks “The ownership status of land . . . is only
one factor to consider in determining whether regulation of the activities of nonmembers is ‘necessary to protect tribal self-government or to control internal relations.’ . . . But the existence of tribal ownership is not alone enough to support regulatory jurisdiction over nonmembers.”
![Page 12: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Plains Commerce Bank128 S.Ct. 2709 (2008)
Montana does not permit Indian tribes to regulate the sale of non-Indian fee land
Montana and its progeny permit tribal regulation of nonmember conduct inside reservation that “implicates the tribe’s sovereign interests”
“Tribe’s ‘traditional and undisputed power to exclude persons from tribal land, gives it the power to set conditions on entry to that land . . via licensing requirements and hunting regulations”
![Page 13: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Compliance with Tribal or State Law does not relieve compliance with Federal requirements unless explicitly approved by EPA under Federal law
![Page 14: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
What is TAS?
Congress gave EPA authority to treat tribes in same manner as statute authorizes states
Clean Water Act (CWA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), and 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAA)
![Page 15: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
How is a tribe eligible for TAS?
Federally recognized Governing body carrying out
substantial duties and powers Jurisdiction or authority over area or
activities to be regulated Capable of carrying out activities
necessary to administer program
![Page 16: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
CAA Delegation of Authority
EPA interpreted CAA as statutory grant by
Congress of jurisdictional authority to
Tribes over Indian and non-Indian sources
within reservation boundaries
For areas outside boundaries of
reservation, application must demonstrate
tribe’s inherent authority
![Page 17: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
How to Show Authority for TAS
For applications covering areas within a reservation, the Tribe must identify, with clarity and precision, the exterior boundaries of reservation [see Sec. 110(o)]
“Reservation” includes lands held in trust for a tribe (tribal trust) and pueblos
![Page 18: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Tribal Implementation Plans
A tribe with TAS may develop air programs under Tribal law, subject to approval by EPA
Tribes are not bound by CAA deadlines for submittal of implementation plans
Tribes may operate CAA programs using a modular approach, or may chose to not undertake air quality work under the CAA
No need for full criminal authority
![Page 19: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
ApprovedTribal Implementation Plans
Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe of New York, Dec. 10, 2007
Mohegan Tribe of Connecticut, Nov. 14, 2007
![Page 20: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
TAS ConsiderationsTAS Considerations EPA will offer state opportunity to
comment on reservation boundaries & publish newspaper notices of comment opportunity
Once a TIP is approved by EPA, tribe’s rules are federally enforceable
Compliance with EPA-approved TIP means compliance with CAA
![Page 21: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
EPA’s Direct Implementation Authority under the CAA in Indian Country
TAR preamble states EPA will protect air quality throughout Indian Country by directly implementing the CAA's requirements under authority of sec. 301(d)(4) where tribes have chosen not to develop or are not implementing aCAA program
![Page 22: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Federal Implementation Plans
CAA gives EPA discretionary authority to promulgate Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) provisions as “necessary or appropriate” to protect air quality within specific areas of Indian Country 40 CFR § 49.11(a)
![Page 23: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
FIPs that Have Been Issued
Prevention of Significant Deterioration rules for Indian Reservations, 40 CFR 52.21 (1978)
Tri-Cities landfill, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, 40 CFR 49.22 (1999)
Astaris-Idaho LLC Facility (formerly FMC Corporation) in Fort Hall PM10 Nonattainment Area, 40 CFR 49.10711 (2000)
Federal Air Rules for Reservations (FARR) in EPA Reg. 10, 40 CFR Part 49, subpart C and M (2005)
![Page 24: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
40 CFR Part 71 Title V Regulations for Major
Stationary Sources of Air Pollution
Title V permits only contain “applicable requirements”, as defined in 40 CFR §71.2. In absence of such requirements, EPA issues “hollow” permits
Requirements of TIPs and FIPs must be included in Title V air operating permits issued to major stationary sources located where the TIP and FIP apply
![Page 25: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Proposed Preconstruction New Source Review Rules
Nonattainment Area Major NSR permitsSources with PTE at least 100 tons/year
(lower for some pollutants)Requires Lowest Achievable Emission
Rate technology (LAER)Emission offsets
Minor NSRSources above thresholdsSynthetic minor sources
![Page 26: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
EPA Program Delegation
Delegates authority to tribe to help EPA administer a specific federal air ruleEPA retains responsibility for enforcement
Delegation allows tribe to gain experience by assisting with implementation of federal rules while deciding whether to establish tribal air program under CAA or tribal law
![Page 27: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Delegation of the Part 71 Program to the Navajo Nation
14 Title V sources on Navajo Nation Permit fees must be sufficient to cover
“permit program costs” Navajo Nation sought delegation of EPA’s
Part 71 program before applying for TAS and Part 70 operating permits program
Fees are paid to Navajo because Part 71 programs fully delegated
![Page 28: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
FARR Delegation
Delegation provision in FARR (§ 49.122) allows Tribes to establish agreement to administer one or more federal rules in effect on reservation
EPA notifies “appropriate governmental entities” and local governments on the Reservation
Delegation Agreements with Nez Perce Tribe and Confederated Umatilla Tribes for open burning permit programs; Quinault Tribe and Coeur d’Alene Tribe for general open burning, including calling “burn bans”
![Page 29: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Direct Implementation Tribal Cooperative Agreements
During FY2001, EPA first authorized to award Direct Implementation Tribal Cooperative Agreements (DITCA) to Indian tribes and eligible intertribal consortia
Tribe assists EPA in implementing federal environmental programs for Indian tribes in absence of acceptable tribal program
![Page 30: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Reasons for DITCAs
Some tribes find TAS process cumbersome, risky EPA cannot use grant or cooperative agreement
mechanisms for funding tribe to help EPA directly implement federal program
DITCA provides tribes with opportunities to Develop capacity Address specific tribal environmental priorities
within EPA direct implementation authority Determine scope and pace of tribal involvement
![Page 31: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
INSPECTOR CREDENTIALS
Sec. 114(a)(2) of the CAA provides “the Administrator or
his authorized representative, upon presentation of his
credentials, shall have a right of entry to, upon, or
through any premises . . . and may at reasonable times
have access to and copy any records, inspect any
monitoring equipment . . . and sample any emissions
which such person is required to sample.”
![Page 32: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS AS AUTHORIZED EPA REP
Ensures better coverage by trained inspectors and better enforcement by EPA
Allows quicker response to emergencies, especially in remote areas
Provides increased environmental protection Authorizes direct participation of tribe’s staff Requires EPA to determine that issuing
Inspector credential is appropriate
![Page 33: Managing Air Quality in Indian Country Rich McAllister US EPA Region 10.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/56649d9f5503460f94a897ec/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Contact Information
Rich McAllister
Office of Regional Counsel
US EPA Region 10
206-553-8203