GLOBAL LEADERSHIP DINA Y. SULAEMAN. WHAT IS LEADERSHIP? Versus.
Management versus leadership 32pdf
-
Upload
mark-werwath -
Category
Business
-
view
517 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Management versus leadership 32pdf
Management versus leadership Matching the leaders to the context
Management versus leadership
Leadership per Jim Collins
Level 5 refers to the highest level in a hierarchy of executive capabilities that he identified during his research.
Leaders at the other four levels in the hierarchy can produce high degrees of success but not enough to elevate companies from mediocrity to sustained excellence
getting the right people on the bus (and the wrong people off the bus)
creating a culture of discipline
Participative approach, first who then what
Traditional contrasts Murray Johannsen
Leadership is tough stuff (Vision alone is not enough)
Situational awareness
Leaders need a compelling vision of the future
The vision needs to be the right vision
Leaders need to sell their vision
Must be a big picture thinker
Leaders get people to follow
Compassionate
High emotional intelligence
Likeable-appealing to the common man and the intellectual at the same time
Smart, good memory, don’t bring up ancient history
Personal integrity, high ethical standards
Mistakes must be remedied early
Consistency while being adaptable
Articulate, poised, charm, charisma
Self confidence is good
Focused-Sticks to the talking points
Context determines the formula that is needed
Great leaders
Prophets
Prophets are not usually appreciated in their lifetimes They are often persecuted for their beliefs and prophecy Hard to be a leader and a prophet
Would be leaders??
Recent resignations/departures Steven Sinofsky, Windows chief, rumored to be next Microsoft CEO
General Pitreaus, CIA Director since 2011, 4 star general, 37 year career
Eric Holder, Attorney general of the US
Christopher E. Kubasik, 51, incoming CEO of Lockheed Martin
Hilary Clinton, secretary of state 2008-2012
Ulysses Grant U.S. Grant
Never sought elected office, the office sought the man Was a miserable failure in civilian life
Worked as a shoe salesman for a family member Failed in 2 other businesses
Was NOT eloquent Delivered his acceptance speech in a letter
Was rumored to be corrupt and a drunk Were it not for the war, he would have had a life of mediocrity
The context made the leader?
Was excellent at situational awareness He was willing to fight and make decisions He was aware of the big picture: Secession would mean more lives lost than the war itself