Management Case Study of AT&T
-
Upload
wai-kin-li -
Category
Business
-
view
373 -
download
17
Transcript of Management Case Study of AT&T
AT & T
Group 5A
ENG3003 : Engineering Management
American Telephone & Telegraph
Tutorial Document : https://goo.gl/4I1nJE
Group Members
Student Name Student ID Programme
LI Wai Kin 15022276D IMT
FOK Ching Kit 15023151D IMT
WONG Kai Ho 15022322D IMT
TSE Chiu Tung 15024454D IMT
2
Introduction
● AT&T Inc. - an American multinational telecommunications
conglomerate, headquartered at Whitacre Tower in downtown Dallas,
Texas, USA.
● The largest provider of fixed telephone services
● The second-largest provider of mobile telephone services
3
History of AT&T
The former AT&T is well-known to be one of the subsidiaries of Bell
Telephone Company which is a joint stock company that founded in 1876.
The business provided by the AT&T in the 1980s was mainly the
government-authorized telephone services in the US and Canada.
4
History of AT&T
At the time that AT&T was still a member of Bell Telephone Company, it was only a division of the company that have it’s own business.
After AT&T acquired the main company, it began to protect its franchise by performing various tasks:
This result the monopoly of AT&T until 1984 when the company lost in a lawsuit and forced to spun off its regional companies.
5
1. Prevent other companies to enter the telephone market 2. Take over other companies to strengthen its own
Discussion Questions
1. Analyze AT&T’s organization based on functional and divi-sional structures.
2. Would a matrix structure be more effective for AT&T?
3. What is the purpose of the headquarters staff now that AT&T has split into three businesses?
6
Analyze AT&T’s organization based on functional and divisional
structures.
QUESTION 1
7
Traditional Structures
8
AT&T has been adopted to not only one structure in the past century. In fact, the company has switched from one to another in order to survive in the market.
The structures that AT&T applied can be analyzed to 2 major strategies:
Organization Structures of AT&T
9
1. Functional structure2. Divisional structure
Functional Structure of AT&T (1876-1983)
At the time that AT&T was still a member of Bell Telephone Company, it was only a division of the company that have it’s own business.
The former AT&T was only a small size company.
● Focus on only a few businesses (eg. telephone service in US)
● The works of the company are concentrated(eg. no extra business)
● Work units are grouped by people with similar skills or tasks
● All members of the unit are the expertises in that area
10
Functional Structure of AT&T (1876-1983)
AT&T at that time divided the work according to their functions.
11
Divisional Structure
12
Divisional Structure of AT&T (1984 --)
There are two divisional structure that AT&T adopted.
From 1984 onwards, AT&T spun off its seven regional Bell companies.
Geographical-divisional Structure
From 1996 onwards, AT&T split into three operating units.
Product-divisional Structure
13
Geographical-divisional Structure (1984-1995)
January 1, 1984, AT&T Corp.'s local operations were split into seven independent Regional Bell Operating Companies known as "Baby Bells".
14
Product-divisional Structure (1996 onwards)
After the Robert Allen became the CEO, he announced a trivestiture plan in response to the The Telecommunication Act of 1996, resulting AT&T to split into three operating units:
Each unit is corresponding to one service only.
People working on the same product are grouped together.15
I. AT&T ServicesII. AT&T Network EquipmentIII. AT&T Global Information Systems
Divisions of AT&T nowadays according to Wikipedia
Advantages of divisional structure of AT&T
The divisional structure can effectively solve the problems in the functional model including the obsess of upward referral of decisions and the lack of a broad view on objectives’ performance.
This also bring advantages to the organisation:
16
I. Improved coordinationII. Expertise focused on region/productIII. Easy restructuring
Comparison
http://keydifferences.com/difference-between-functional-and-divisional-structure.html17
Would a matrix structure be more effective for AT&T?
QUESTION 2
18
19
Splitting into 3 Operating Units
❖ 2-boss system
➢ Power struggles ➜ Conflict in work priorities ➜ Dual chain of commands
➢ Task confusion
➢ Double cost for 2 team leaders
❖ To keep people on the right track
➢ Time consuming for team meetings
20
Disadvantage using Matrix Structure
● Better cooperation across functions
● Improved decision making
● Increased flexibility in restructuring
● Better customer service
● Better performance accountability
● Improved strategic management
21
Advantages using Matrix Structure
22
Yes !
What is the purpose of the headquarters staff now that AT&T
has split into three businesses?
QUESTION 3
23
3 businesses
24
In 1996...
● New CEO C. Michael Armstrong has brought in an “invest or divest”:○ Sold AT&T’s Universal Card Services, its credit card division with 18 million accounts, to Citibank
for $3.5 billion.
○ Sold AT&T’s Solutions Cus-tomer Care unit, which pro-vides outsourcing and con-sulting for call
centers, to Cincinnati Bell for $625 million.
○ Bought Teleport Communica-tions Group, an upstart local phone company with strong
management. [1]
● Strategic Analysis: Identify and analyze core
values
25
Focusing back on the Core Businesses
● " The biggest impact Armstrong is having at AT&T is to shake up the
old bureaucratic ways and shorten decision-making cycles. "[1]
● Disadvantages of matrix structures: Team meetings are time
consuming
26
Improving Decision Making
● " Restructured compensation for AT&T’s top management, closely linking performance to salary. "[1]
● Advantages of matrix structures: Better performance accountability
27
Improving Performance Accountability
Conclusion
Q1. Analyze AT&T’s organization based on functional and divi-sional structures.
28
Conclusion
Q2. Would a matrix structure be more effective for AT&T?
Yes, the matrix structure is more effective for the current AT&T.
29
Conclusion
Q3. What is the purpose of the headquarters staff now that AT&T has split into three businesses?
1. Focusing back on the Core Businesses
2. Improving Decision Making
3. Improving Performance Accountability
30
References
1. Schermerhorn, J.R. Management, 6th Edition, John Wiley, 1999, p.433-435.
2. "History of AT&T," in Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 2016. [Online]. Available:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_AT%26T. Accessed: Nov. 2, 2016.
3. S. S, "Business," in Business, Key Differences, 2016. [Online]. Available:
http://keydifferences.com/difference-between-functional-and-divisional-structure.html. Accessed: Nov. 2,
2016.
4. Nodir M. A., "Matrix Organization Structure: Advantages and Disadvantages" [Online]. Available:
http://bibliofond.ru/view.aspx?id=464506. Accessed: Nov. 4, 2016.
5. Rose J., "Advantages & Disadvantages of Matrix Organizational Structures in Business Organizations",
Chron [Online]. Available:
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-disadvantages-matrix-organizational-structures-business-or
ganizations-26350.html. Accessed: Nov. 8, 2016.31
References
6. Christopher C., "Advantages & Disadvantages of the Four Basic Organization Structures", Chron [Online].
Available:
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-disadvantages-four-basic-organization-structures-24062.htm
l. Accessed: Nov. 8, 2016.
32
ENDThank you for listening
33