LSST VAO Meeting March 24, 2011 Tucson, AZ. Headquarters Site Headquarters Facility Observatory...

11
LSST VAO Meeting March 24, 2011 Tucson, AZ

Transcript of LSST VAO Meeting March 24, 2011 Tucson, AZ. Headquarters Site Headquarters Facility Observatory...

LSST VAO Meeting

March 24, 2011Tucson, AZ

Headquarters SiteHeadquarters FacilityObservatory ManagementScience OperationsEducation and Public Outreach

Archive SiteArchive CenterNightly Reprocessing

Data Release Production Long-term Storage (copy 2)Data Access Center

Data Access and User Services120 - 330 TFLOPS17 - 140 PB Disk5 - 100 PB Tape

Base SiteBase FacilityAlert Production

Long-term storage (copy 1)Data Access Center

Data Access and User Services50 - 60 TFLOPS9 - 110 PB Disk5 - 100PB Tape

Summit SiteSummit Facility

Telescope and CameraData Acquisition

Crosstalk Correction

Data Management System Sites and Centers

Data Management Presentation to LSSTC Board 3

ChileDAC

Tucson

La Serena

Pachon

Santiago SaoPaolo

Miami

NCSA

Data80Gbps

TCS/OCSControl20Gbps

10/100GbpsReuna

10/100GbpsLauren/Clara

10/100Gbps Amlight

10/100GbpsNLR/I2

TeraGrid

(Telefonica&Telmex)

DMS long-haul network design

• Mountain summit – Base is only new fiber, 100 Gbps capacity• Inter-site Long-Haul links on existing fibers

– Chile-US– Archive – HQ– DAC – End Users

• 1 Gbps 2011, 10 Gbps 2015, 100 Gbps 2025• Site End Equipment is available today

Network Design Document-7354

Panama LosAngeles

Data Management Presentation to LSSTC Board 4

DMS cyber-security plan

• Threats– Denial of service

attacks– Break-in attempts– Internal attacks– Code injection– Personal computer

malware, viruses, etc.

• Best practices– Monitor

infrastructure– Partition resources– Grant limited

privileges– Simulate threats

Cyber-security Plan-9733

LSST DM R&D Plan To Date

LSST DM R&D Plan To Be Done

DMS Data Challenge Infrastructure

SPIE 2010 June 30, 2010 San Diego, CA

Data Management Presentation to LSSTC Board 8

DMS Middleware - Pipeline processing• Middleware runs in full production

mode as operational system will do

• Have executed in parallel on hundreds of processing cores

• Performance can be increased by adding more hardware, input/output remains most constraining

• Cross-project workshops conducted with DES, JWST, ODI, UWis Condor group to leverage lessons learned

• Provenance and Fault-Tolerance demonstrations by PDR

DMS Middleware – Database Architecture

• Current relational database technology cannot handle LSST data volumes• Solution: make many

databases look like one to users and applications• Scale by adding database

instances/servers without software changes• Full prototype now

implemented

9Supercomputing 2010

NSF ReviewDecember 15-17, 2009Tucson, AZ 10

Data Challenge Applications ScopeDC3a

DC3a

DC2

DC2

DC3b

DC3bDC4

DC4

DC4

DC1

DC1

Data Management Presentation to LSSTC Board 11

DMS Applications Status• Since the start of R&D, spent on software development and

integration– $8M (out of $10M total R&D spent)– 90 FTE years (funded and in-kind, average 40% on project)

• By comparison– Terapix (unknown, 7 people, started in 1997)– 2MASS (165 FTE years)– SDSS (145 FTE years low estimate, 215 FTE years high estimate)– Above estimates are from respective project managers/technical leads