Local Report 2010 Switzerland 14th June 2010. 2 Design of the study.

Local Report 2010

Switzerland

14th June 2010

2

• Design of the study

3

14 countries covered by the study in 2010 including 2 new members : Brazil & Turkey

EUROPE

4

Sample: 3316 interviews through Europe: Covering all company sizes Including 1552 interviews of Large Companies

Target: Companies of all industries using corporate vehicles

Fieldwork period: From January 2010 to February 2010

Data collection method: Per telephone

Local Sample : 4 segments

Methodology

Global Sample

Companies with

Less than 10 employees

97 67 89 60

Companies with

10 to 99 employees

Companies with

100 to 499 employees

Companies with

500 employees and +

5

89 28% 67

21%

97 31%

60 20%

88%

0%11%

1%

Distribution of companies in the country

*

Local sample

* Source: National Institutes of Statistics / Eurostat – private sector** Unweighted figures. The distribution of companies interviewed has been reweighted according to its real structure at the local level.

Base: companies with corporate vehicles

*

6

• Evaluation of situation and trend

7

18%

8%

10%

9%

7%

28%

19%

23%

16%

22%

18%

17%

11%

9%

5% 17%

Fleet growth potential in the next 3 years

Decrease Increase

Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

BALANCE 2010

Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease

-0.8%

26

-0.8%

26

12%

10%

8%

12%

7%

13%

11%

10%

BALANCE 2009

3%

7%

-5%

9%

2%

2%

14%

2%

EUROPEComparison with

8

Distribution of the fleet

•Transport vehicles: of less than 3,5 tons•Service vehicles: used for maintenance and repair of facilities, general services, after-sales services…•Sales vehicles: intended for sales travel and appointments• Incentive vehicles: made available to employees as part of the company’s compensation policy• Vehicles in exchange of a monthly cost: deduced from the employee’s salary

Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100% Total can be different from 100% due to DK

4%17%

11% 16% 11%16% 19% 19%10%

6% 19% 12% 20%16% 10%

19%23%

21%

27%24%

25%27%

24%

28%20%

23%

14% 21%19%

21%24%

21%43%34% 30% 29% 26%

19% 23%13%

Transport vehicles

Service vehicles

Sales vehicles

Incentive vehicles

Vehicules in exchangeof a monthly cost


9

Light commercial vehicles and Personal Cars

72 656454

Average duration of usage of the fleet

87 8477 69

Comparison with EUROPE

Light Commercial

Vehicles

Average duration of usage in months

+ +

Personal Cars

10

• Companies reaction to the crisis

11

Answers to the crisis

% who introduced the measure as an answer to the crisis

EUROPE


Comparison with

45%

23%

22%

19%

11%

12%

11%

12%

10%

8%

10%

11%

32%

20%

15%

12%

10%

10%

7%

6%

7%

5%

4%

2%

Measures to reduce fuelconsumption

Renegotiate costs with fleetproviders

Purchasing rather than leasing

Reducing the size of your fleet

Downsizing engine size

Outsourcing more services

Downgrading vehicle category

Changing rules of allocations

Increasing the duration of thelease contract

Sale and lease back

Develop car pooling or car sharing

Promoting Home Working

+ +

12

• Financing trends

13

Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Don’t know & others excluded

Main financing method

Consolidated results – Comparison with EUROPE

28%

32%

57%

38%

53%

47%

58%

3%

3%

16%

1%

18%

27%

29%

35%

38%

30%

36%

54%

15%

37%

10%

18%

6%

5%

66% 2%

1%

3%

9%

17%

7%

Self purchase Car credit Financial leasing Operating leasing


Self-purchase = outright purchase + credit (other than car credit) Don’t know & others excludedData have been consolidated: 3 years average for France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland, Poland, Belgium and Czech Republic, Spain and India2 years average for UK and Greece1 year only for Brazil and Turkey

14


Global fleet growth potential in the next 3 years according to main financing method

Decrease Increase


Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease

Self purchase

Car credit

Financial leasing

Operating leasing

BALANCE

4%

1%

8%

7%

10%

24%

22%

18%

11%

19%

19%

17%

7%

8%

21% 14%

7%

19%

12%

3%

10%

21%

20%

15

• Car policy and impact on environment and driver

16

Due to the crisis, the vehicle policy...

23%

10%

65%

21%

1%

22%

55%

19%

1%

21%

59%

24%

4%

19%

51%

Has already changed Will change in the nextfew weeks

Will change in a longerterm

Will not change

In 2010 – Per company size

Impact of the crisis on the vehicle policy

GLOBAL 2010

22% 0% 13% 63%

GLOBAL 2009

6% 2% 22% 66%

Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100% Total can be different from 100% due to DK

17

Users liberty of choosing a vehicle


Freely within a given budget

In a limited list

No personal choice

% of companies in which most of users have to choose…


12% 12% 5% 14% 16% 26% 20%37%21% 27% 33%

24%27% 30%

27%

61% 57% 63% 63% 57%46% 48%

35%

22%

Total can be different from 100% due to DK

18

• Car policy and impacts of the crisis

19

Choice criteria when adding new vehicles to the fleet



% who quote as most important criteria

Total

Their net purchase price

Their total cost of usage

Their monthly leasing

27% 26%

12% 13%

59% 58%

2% 3%


Don‘t know / no answer

20

Perceived evolution of average duration since last year


Total

10%8%

14%17%

% who say that the average duration of Personal cars has…

Base: companies with Personal cars/Excluding second-hand vehicles

Increased

Decreased

21

45%

23%

22%

18%

11%

11%

11%

12%

10%

8%

10%

11%

32%

20%

15%

12%

10%

10%

7%

7%

7%

5%

4%

2%

Measures to reduce fuel consumption

Renegotiate costs with fleet providers

Purchasing rather than leasing

Reducing the size of your fleet

Downsizing engine size

Outsourcing more services

Downgrading vehicle category

Changing rules of allocations

Increasing the duration of the leasecontract

Sale and lease back

Develop car pooling or car sharing

Promoting Home Working

Answers to the crisis

% who introduced the measure as an answer to the crisis


Total


22

15%10%

1% 3% 1% 1%

33%

23%

9%

1% 1% 3%

43%

30%

6%1% 2%

9%

53%

37%

12% 10% 12%16%

At least onegreen vehicle

Fuel efficientlabels

LPG or naturalgaz

Flex fuel orusing plant-based fuels

Electric Hybrid


% At least one of these green vehicles

By company size - 2010

Use of green vehicles

23

Main barriers for taking a green vehicle

% who quote each barrier for a specific vehicle


Hybrid

Base: companies with more than 10 employees, with corporate vehicles, and not intending to use green vehicles in the next 3 years

24

Main barriers for taking a green vehicle

% who quote each barrier for a specific vehicle


Hybrid

Base: companies with more than 10 employees, with corporate vehicles, and not intending to use green vehicles in the next 3 years

25

81%65%

73%56%

Evolution of the budget allocated to the company vehicles


Total Changes

No changes

% who reduced the budget allocated to company vehicles due to the crisis

++Base: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%

10%20% 18%

27%8%

13%8%

13%

18% 33% 26% 40%

Yes, more than 10% of budget

Yes, from 0 to 10%


26

33%

16%

6%

7%

6%

11%

8%

22%

18%

24%

20%

17%

12%

12%

55%

34%

30%

27%

23%

22%

20%

Navigation System for the driver

Fuel card reporting

Reporting on CO2 emission

Remote Geolocalisation

Reporting on accidents

Indicators on driving behaviour ofusers

Transmission of onboard dataincluding mileage

Interest for additional services


% of interest for the following services

47%

32%

35%

35%

29%

29%

26%

+ +


49%

58%

47%

35%

49%

42%

47%

Very interested Rather Interested XX% ST Interested

27

PC and LCV Registrations

Switzerland

Source: ACEA

-17,6

+14,3-7,4

-9,9

+10,7

-7,5 -10,6

-6,3-2,3

+3,2 -1,6

+18,3

-3,4-13,6

-20,5

+31,2+25,5

-5,7-13,8 -16,9

+5,8 +9,1+2,5

+12,4+4,3

-14,2

0

8 000

16 000

24 000

janv-97 janv-98 janv-99 janv-00 janv-01 janv-02 janv-03 janv-04 janv-05 janv-06 janv-07 janv-08 janv-09 janv-10

-40,0

-20,0

+0,0

+20,0

+40,0

+60,0

+80,0

PC registration LCV registration % Variation PC Year N vs N-1 % Variation LCV Year N vs N-1

Local Report 2010 Switzerland 14th June 2010. 2 Design of the study.

Documents

Transcript of Local Report 2010 Switzerland 14th June 2010. 2 Design of the study.