list_new2.asp(1)

TA No. 26/2015

Ravinder Singh Tanwar

Vs.

Vivek Mehta & Anr.

15.5.2015

Present: Sh. Rajpal Singh, counsel for the applicant.

Sh. Raghav Sharma, counsel for the non-

applicant No. 1.

Ld. counsel for the applicant has informed that

order on the application has been passed by the court

of Sh. Deepak Sehrawat, Ld. ACJ, S/W.

Since the order on application under order 12

Rule 6 CPC has already been passed by Ld. ACJ, S/W,

the application is not being pressed by the counsel for

the applicant. As such, no order is required to be

passed.

Transfer application be consigned to record

room.

(Ravinder Kaur) District & Sessions Judge:

South West District Dwarka Courts/Delhi/15.5.2015(ch)

CR No. 12/2015

S.P.Jain & Anr.

Vs.

BBC Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd.

15.5.2015

Present: None for the petitioner.

Sh. Sanjay Madan, counsel for the respondent.

Matter has been called twice however, none

has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. As such,

present revision petition is dismissed in default.

Trial court record be sent back along with the

copy of this order with directions to proceed with the

matter as per law.

Revision file be consigned to record room.



CA No. 101/2014

State Vs. Vikram Kadiyan

15.5.2015

Present: Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, Ld. Chief Prosecutor,

on behalf of the State.

Court notice issued to the respondent received

back unserved. IO has submitted report that

respondent has been convicted in case FIR No.

92/2013, U/S 454/380/411 IPC of PS Civil Line, Karnal

Haryana and he is presently lodged at Karnal Jail,

Haryana.

Issue production warrant of the respondent for

1.6.2015.



CR No. 35/2015

Sai Cargo Movers & Anr. Vs. Balaji Cargo

15.5.2015

Present: Sh. Gurvinder Singh, counsel for the

petitioner.

Petitioner No. 2 in person and on behalf of

petitioner No. 1 company.

Respondent in person along with counsel

Sh. Jogender Kumar.

Arguments heard.

Put up for order at 4.00 pm.



PPA No. 2/2010

Sunil Dutt Vs. Union of India & Anr.

15.5.2015Present: Appellant in person.

Sh. Mayank Soni, Advocate proxy for Sh. S.C Singhal, counsel for the appellant.Havaldar Manoj Kumar, from Station HQ, Delhi Cantt is present on behalf of the respondent.

Adjournment is sought on behalf of the parties

as their counsel are not available today.

The matter is one of the 20 oldest cases

pending in this court. No ground is made out for

adjournment however, in the interest of justice, matter

is adjourned to 21.5.2015 for arguments, by way of last

and final opportunity, subject to cost of Rs. 2,000/-

each, to be deposited by both the parties with DLSA.

Further it is made clear that no further opportunity

shall be granted for arguments on any ground

whatsoever.



CA No. 28/2013

Jagbir Singh Vs. Satish Kumar

15.5.2015Present: Smt. Beena, wife of appellant in person.

Respondent Satish Kumar in person with counsel Sh. M.S Kaushik.

Today wife of the appellant has made payment of

Rs. 80,000/- to the respondent.

In token of receipt of Rs. 80,000/- signature of

respondent is taken on the order sheet.

Wife of the appellant has requested for some more

time for making payment of remaining amount.

Counsel for the respondent has insisted that

petitioner be also directed to pay some interest on delayed

payment.

This matter be discussed in the presence of the

counsel of the appellant, on the next date of hearing.

Put up for payment of entire balance amount, on

25.5.2015. Appellant is directed to appear in person on the next

date. Operation of order dated 13.2.2015, regarding issuance of

NBW against the appellant is suspended till next date of hearing.



Contempt Appl. No. 1/2014

Satish Kumar Vs. Jagbir Singh

15.5.2015

Present: Applicant in person with counsel Sh. M.S.

Kaushik.

Respondent absent. Smt. Beena wife of

respondent is present.

Put up on 25.5.2015 along with CA No.

28/2013, titled Jagbir Singh Vs. Satish Kumar.



CR No. 51/2015

Mohan Bharti Vs. State

15.5.2015

Present: None for the petitioner.

Be awaited



(1.10 pm)

Present None for the petitioner.

Case called twice.

Since, none has appeared on behalf of the

petitioner despite repeated calls, present revision

petition is dismissed in default.

File be consigned to record room.



ARBT No. 125/2014

Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.

Vs.

Apex Encon Projects Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

15.5.2015

Present: Sh. Tarun Sharma, AR of the petitioner

company.

Sh. Amit Chauhan, Adv. proxy for Sh. Anurag

Jain, counsel for the respondent company.

Reply to arbitration petition filed on behalf of the

Respondent. Copy supplied.

Sh. Tarun Sharma, AR has submitted that counsel

for the petitioner has not come today and seeks

adjournment. It is further submitted that they were under

impression that matter is fixed today for filing of reply.

Perusal of record shows that today matter is fixed

for filing of reply as well as for arguments. No ground is

made out for adjournment however, in the interest of justice,

matter is adjourned to 25.5.2015 for arguments, subject to

cost of Rs. 500/-, to be deposited by the petitioner with

DLSA.



ARBT No. 126/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 127/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 128/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 129/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 130/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 131/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 132/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 133/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 134/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 135/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 136/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 137/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 138/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 139/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 140/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.














DLSA.



ARBT No. 141/2014


Vs.


15.5.2015


company.




Respondent. Copy suppl ied.










DLSA.



MCDA No. 9/2012Pushpa Devi Vs. MCD & Anr.

15.5.2015

File taken up today on receipt of directions from

Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, vide order dated 13.4.2015, to

dispose off the present appeal within 12 weeks.

The Ahlmad has reported that this order has been

communicated to this court on 13.5.2015, i.e. after lapse of four

weeks.

Matter is already fixed for arguments for 13.7.2015.



FIR No. 982/2007PS DabriState Vs. Sachin @ Suraj & ors.

15.5.2015

File taken up in view of the directions of Hon'ble

High Court of Delhi dated 21.4.2015, for initiating the

proceedings u/s 82 & 83 Cr.P.C against respondent No. 2

Sher Singh @ Sheru S/o Bheem Singh, R/o Mohalla Chidya

Khana, Gate No. 2, PS Sachivalaya, District Patna, Bihar.

Issue process u/s 82 Cr.P.C against the

respondent No. 2 referred above, as per the proforma given

in form No. 4 Second Schedule of Cr.P.C, through

concerned SHO, with directions to send the same by hand

i.e. special messenger, not below the rank of Head

Constable, returnable on or before 1.7.2015.

Further, SHO is directed to get the process u/s

82 Cr.P.C served by way of publication, in Local newspaper

i.e. Dainik Jagran Patna Edition and National Newspaper

i.e. Hindi Daily Hindustan.

Copy of this order be sent to SHO Concerned for

compliance.


South West District Dwarka Courts/Delhi/15.5.2015

SC 33/14FIR No. 336/14PS DabriState Vs.Sushant Kumar

PW-10 Ct. Sukhdev recalled for further examination in chief deferred on 1.4.2015.

OnSA

I can identify the knife as the knife was a

vegetable cutting knife and its total length is approximately

12 inches and shape of the blade is straight having pointed

edge on beginning. I can also identify the T Shirt of the

accused. However, I do not remember its colour. I can

identify the black colour motorcycle bearing no.DL7S BC

1558 if shown to me.

At this stage MHC (M) has produced parcel no.3

sealed with the seal of court, seal intact, and the same is

opened and a vegetable cutting knife is taken out from the

pullanda and same is shown to the witness who identifies the

same. Same is already Ex.P.1.

Another pullanda brought by MHC (M) sealed

with the seal of KC, seal intact and the same is opened and a

white colour blood stained T Shirt is taken out and is shown

to the witness who identifies the same which was seized by

the IO and belongs to the accused. Same is Ex.P.2.

At this stage witness has seen the motorcycle

bearing no. DL7S BC 1558 brought by MHC (M) parked in

the court premises and stated it is the same which was

seized by the IO at the spot. Same is now Ex.P.3.

Xxxxxxx by Shri Subhash Dixit, Ld. counsel for the

accused, from DLSA.

DD no.40A was received in the police station at

about 8.45 pm and immediately we left the police station. I

had not made any departure entry and IO might have made

the same. I along with IO reached at the spot within 15-20

minutes. At the spot Sunil, brother of injured was found

present. There were 25-30 public persons present at the

spot. IO had requested 3-4 public persons to join the

investigation. One or two females were joined in the

investigation. Their statements were recorded by the IO.

They had informed the IO about the incident. However I do

not remember their names.

Some writing work was being done by the IO

before he left for the hospital but I do not know what was

written by him. Sunil Kumar the brother of the injured had

informed the IO that injured was removed to Bhagat

Chandra Hospital.

IO had left the spot after 15 -20 minutes of our

reaching the spot. The knife which was handed over by

Sunil Kumar to the IO was handed over to me before he left

for the hospital. It was in unsealed condition. Two beat

constables had also arrived at the spot while IO was leaving

for the hospital.

IO had returned to the spot at about 10.30 pm.

SHO had arrived at the sport before return of IO.

Crime Team had reached the spot after the arrival of IO

from hospital.

In my presence IO had recorded the statement of

Sunil Kumar only.

The personal search memo, seizure memo of the

knife, seizure memo of motorcycle and rukka was prepared

by the IO in my presence.

In answer to leading question by Ld. CPP : the arrest

memo of the accused was also prepared by the IO, in my

presence.

IO had obtained my signature on arrest memo,

personal search memo and seizure memos. I had signed

these documents after I returned to the spot along with copy

of FIR.

From the personal search of the accused one

purse containing ATM cards and some currency was

recovered.

The sketch of the knife was also prepared by the

IO in my presence, at the spot. I do not remember if IO had

obtained my signature thereon. I do not remember if IO had

prepared any other document at the spot.

The accused was arrested around 1.30 am.

It is correct that knife like Ex.P.1 is easily

available in the market . It is wrong to suggest that Knife

Ex.P.1 was planted upon the accused. Voln. It was in the

hand of accused when we reached the spot. It is incorrect

to suggest that I had not joined the investigation and for this

reason I could not tell the colour of the T shirt worn by the

accused when we saw him at the spot. IO had seized the T

shirt of the accused in my presence at the spot but I do not

remember the time when IO seized the same. It is incorrect

to suggest that T shirt Ex.P.2 was planted upon the accused.

I remained associated with the investigation of

this case till the accused was produced in the court on

10.5.2014. The statements of witnesses other than Sunil

were also recorded in my presence at the spot before 5.30

am. It is wrong to suggest that in connivance with police the

family members of injured falsely implicated the accused in

this case.

RO & AC

(Ravinder Kaur) District & Sessions Judge


SC 15/14FIR No. 203/11PS KapasheraState Vs. Gaurav @ Mini @ Mita & Ors.

PW-5 Ranjit Kumar Mahto S/o Shri Suraj Mal Mahto, Aged : 36 years R/o Jhuggi no.8/35, Kirti Nagar, New Delhi (Previously resided at Sector 21, Gurgaon, Saya Tour & Travels).

OnSAOn 23.11.2011 I was driving Innova HR 55 NT

7249 of Saya Tours & Travels. At about 9.30 pm I dropped

the staff of Saya Tours & Travels at Shahdara and was

returning to Gurgaon. When I reached Andheria Mor, I saw

three boys standing at Andheria Mor bus stand. They gave

hand to stop the vehicle. I stopped the vehicle to pick them

up as passengers. They asked me if I would go to

Mahipalpur. I replied in the affirmative. One of those boys

sat in the front by the side of driver seat and remaining two

at the back seat. Thereafter I started moving the vehicle and

reached Mahipalpur. They asked me as to where I would

proceed further. I told them that I would to Kapashera.

They asked me to drop them also at Kapashera. When I

reached behind the police station Kapashera, the boy who

was sitting in front told the boys sitting behind Laga de.

On his saying this one of the boys sitting behind me had put

pistol on my forehead and the person who was sitting in

front asked me to stop the vehicle. I become perplexed so I

stopped the vehicle. They asked me to sit at the back seat

but I told them to take away the vehicle and in the meantime

the two boys who were sitting on the back seat had pulled

me back from the gap between the front two seats and made

me sit in between the two. The boy who was sitting in the

front sat on the driving seat the started driving. The boy

who was sitting on my right side kept the pistol on my waist.

They car was driven towards Dwarka via under pass and

then from the red light they took right U turn and drove

towards Vasant Kunj. From there it was driven towards

Kapashera. When we had reached Rangpuri one boy came

from behind on motorcycle. The boys who were sitting in

Innova were talking with someone and were calling someone

as Chacha and asked him to come that side by telling him

that they were at Vasant Kunj. They boy who came on the

motorcycle started riding in front of Innova and sometimes

on its side. Then again the vehicle was taken towards

Dwarka Sector 27. There I was asked by the boys in Innova

to get down. While I was in the process of getting down I

was hit with spanner (paana) and with the butt of the pistol,

three four time by one of the two boys who were sitting

along with me at the back seat. Since I had heard those boys

that they would give me beating till I become unconscious so

I kept my both the hands and sat down and thereafter those

boys started jumping on my body. After jumping five seven

times and I pretended that I was unconscious they left me

there while saying ab ye subah tak hilega bhi nahi and

thereafter two boys drove away Innova and two boys left on

motorcycle. Thereafter I got up and I ran away and walked

to jungle where it was too dark. While I was sitting in the

vehicle I was beaten up by the boys and was also made to lie

on their feet. My mobile phone, purse containing ID card,

driving licence and some money i.e. around Rs.400/- were

removed by the person who was sitting on my left side. The

purse was of black colour. Mobile phone was of Nokia

1208.

After crossing the jungle I reached main road and

stopped one two wheeler scooter and informed him about

the incident and also told him to inform my employer. From

his mobile phone he informed my employer about the

incident. My employer reached that place, informed the

police and police reached there. I was removed to some

hospital at Najafgarh where I was bandaged and referred to

Jaffarpur Hospital. However I was not taken to Jaffarpur

Hospital by my employer. Instead he called his brother on

telephone to reach there where we were present but his

brother did not turn up. My employer namely Joginder was

tracking the movement of Innova vehicle on GPS and then

we proceeded towards Sonipat the directions shown on the

GPS. As per the location shown on GPS the vehicle was

parked at village Rasoi, Sonipat. At Sonipat there were

12-13 Gypsies of 100 number (PCR). The innova was found

parked there and there were four persons in the same but

on seeing the police they all escaped. The police had seized

the said vehicle. The vehicle was then brought back to PS

Kapashera.

Police had recorded my statement on 24.11.2011

where my employer had reached after the rider of two

wheeler scooter had informed him of my presence there. I

had signed my said statement. I identify my signature

thereon and the same is now Ex.PW5/A.

In answer to court question : After my said

statement was recorded I was proceeded towards Sonipat

with my employer, in esteem car whereas police had

accompanied us in Xylo. I can identify all the four boys

involved in the incident.

The witness has seen three accused namely

Hitesh, Himanshu and Uttam Rana, present in court.

(Accused Gaurav is exempted from appearnace through his

counsel, Shri Jai Singh Yadav).

The witness has pointed out towards accused

Hitesh that he was on the motorcycle and has pointed out

towards accused Himanshu and Uttam Rana as the two boys

who had pulled him to the back seat of Innova.

(further examination in chief is deferred for want of accused

Gaurav @ Mini)

RO & AC



IN THE COURT OF MS RAVINDER KAUR, DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE : SOUTH WEST DISTRICT DWARKA COURTS : NEW DELHI.

FIR No.435/13PS DabriState Vs. Rahul & Ors. CHARGE

I, Ravinder Kaur, District & Sessions Judge, South

West District, Dwarka, New Delhi do hereby charge you

Rahul S/o Sh Narender Pal Singh (2) Pradeep S/o Shri

Bunny Singh (3) Sunil @ Bilota S/o Heera Lal Shaky and (4)

Anand @ Nanhe S/o Shri Narender Pal Singh as under :-

That, on 5.8.2013 at about 11.15 pm at Budh

Bazar Chowk gali No.15, Rajapuri, New Delhi, within the

jurisdiction of PS Dabri, you all the accused persons in

furtherance of common intention of you all gave beatings to

Avdesh S/o Shri Ram Niwas and you accused Rahul caused

number of stab injuries to the complainant with such

intention and knowledge and under such circumstances that,

if by that act you had caused the death of complainant,

Avdesh, you would have been guilty of murder and thereby

committed an offence punishable u/s 307/34 IPC and within

my cognizance. And I hereby direct you that you be tried for

aforesaid offence by this court.

(Ravinder Kaur)

District & Sessions Judge South West District

Dwarka Courts/Delhi/15.5.2015

- 2 -

Certified that charge has been read over and

explained to the accused in vernacular and accused are

questioned as under:-

Q Have you heard the charge and understood the

same ?

A Yes.

Q. Do you plead guilty or claim trial?

A I plead not guilty and claim trial.

RO&AC



SC 33/14FIR No. 336/14PS DabriState Vs.Sushant Kumar

15.05.2015Present: Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, Ld. Chief Prosecutor on

behalf of the State.

Accused Sushant produced from the JC.

Shri Subhash Dixit, Ld. counsel for the accused,

from DLSA.

Further examination in chief & cross examination

of PW-10 Ct. Sukhdev recorded.

IO SI KC Meena is absent despite service. Issue

B/W in the sum of Rs.1000/- against him. B/W be executed

through SHO, PS Dabri.

Put up on 22.5.2015 for entire prosecution

evidence.


South West District Dwarka Courts/Delhi/15.05.2015(RA)

SC 02/2015FIR No.435/13PS DabriState Vs. Rahul & Ors.

15.05.2015Present: Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, Ld. Chief Prosecutor on

behalf of the State.Accused Rahul is present on bail.Accused Pradeep is present on bail.Accused Sunil @ Bilota is present on bail.Accused Anand @ Nanhe is present on bail.Shri B.D.Pandey, Ld. counsel for all the accused persons.

Arguments heard on the point of charge.

I have perused the charge Sheet and the relevant

record. Prima facie case is made out under Section 307/34

IPC against the accused persons. Ld. counsel for the

accused persons have also conceded that charge is made out

against the accused persons under Section 307/34 IPC.

Charge under Section 307/34 IPC is framed

separately, to which accused persons have pleaded not

guilty and claimed trial.

To come up on 1.6.2015 and 2.6.2015 for

prosecution evidence.

PWs mentioned at S.L No. 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8 be

summoned for 1.6.2015.

Remaining witnesses be summoned for 2.6.2015.

Summons be also issued to MHC(M) to produce the case

property on both the dates. IO be present on both the dates.



TA No.23/2015Ram Rattan & Anr. Vs. Dayal Singh & Ors.

15.05.2015Present: Shri N.C.Sharma, Ld. counsel for the applicants.

Shri N.K.Aggarwal, Ld. counsel for the non

applicants with non applicants dayal Singh &

Shashi Bhushan.

Reply filed. Copy supplied.

Arguments heard.

Put up for orders on 18.5.2015.



SC 15/14FIR No. 203/11PS KapasheraState Vs. Gaurav @ Mini @ Mita & Ors.

15.05.2015Present: Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, Ld. Chief Prosecutor on behalf of

the State.Accused Hitesh @ Handa is present on bail.Accused Himanshu @ Pinku is present on bail.Accused Uttam Rana is present on bail.Accused Gaurav @ Mini is absent. Shri Jai Singh Yadav, Ld. counsel for accused persons Himanshu, Uttam and Gaurav.Shri Dhirender Mathur, Ld. counsel for the accused Hitesh @ Handa.

An exemption application has been filed on behalf of accused

Gaurav @ Mini by Sh. Jai Singh Yadav Advocate.

Heard. For the reasons mentioned in the application, accused

Gaurav @ Mini is exempted from his personal appearance for today only

through his counsel.

Examination in chief of PW-5 Ranjit Kumar Mahto recorded.

His further examination in chief is deferred for want of accused Gaurav @

Mini.

PWs ASI Randhir, Ct. Yudhbir, Ct. Jagbir, HC Sunder, MHC

(M) are present. They are discharged unexamined for today.

PW Ct. Pradeep Hooda has sent request that he is on leave till

21.5.2015.

Put up on 4.6.2015 for remaining prosecution evidence.

At this stage, PW Ranjit Kumar Mahto submits that since he

would not be available after 29.5.2015 on account of marriage of his

nephew at Bihar, hence, case now to put up on 9.7.2015 and 10.7.2015

for prosecution evidence.

PWs Ranjit Kumar, ASI Randhir, Ct. Yudhveer, Ct. Jagbir, HC

Sunder be summoned for 9.7.2015.

Remaining witnesses be summoned for 10.7.2015.

Summons be also issued to MHC(M) to produce the case

property on both the dates. IO be present on both the dates.

(Ravinder Kaur)

District & Sessions Judge South West District

Dwarka Courts/Delhi/15.05.2015(RA)

Suman Rawal Vs M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd and Anr.CR No. 32/14

15-05-2015

Present: None.

No time left for dictating the orders, as I was

busy in dictating orders in other case titled Sai Cargo

Movers and Anr. Vs Balaji Cargo, bearing CR No. 35/15.

Put up for orders on 23-05-15.

(Ravinder Kaur)District & Sessions Judge South West DistrictDwarka Courts/ New Delhi

15-05-2015


15-05-2015

Present: None.






15-05-2015

list_new2.asp(1)

Documents

Transcript of list_new2.asp(1)