List of abbreviations - OECD.org · 252 Annex1 AAEF AlbanianAmericanEnterpriseFund ACE...

25
252 Annex 1 AAEF Albanian American Enterprise Fund ACE Action for Co-operation in Economics (EU Phare Programme) APIU Croatian export and investment promotion agency APPRM Agency for Promotion of Entrepreneurship (FYR Macedonia) BAS Business Advisory Service BHEPA Export Council and Export Promotion Agency BIC Business Information Centre BICRO Business Innovation Centre of Croatia BRA Business Registration Agency (Serbia) CAR capital adequacy ratio CIT corporate income tax CIP Competitiveness and Innovation Programme EAR European Agency for Reconstruction EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC DG ENTR European Commission’s Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry EEN Enterprise Europe Network EFSE European Fund for South-Eastern Europe EICC European Information and Communication Centre EIICM European Information and Innovation Centre in Macedonia EPPA Enterprise Policy Performance Assessments ETF European Training Foundation EU European Union FDI foreign direct investment FINA Croatian National Financial Agency FYR Macedonia the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia GDP gross domestic product GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor GNI gross national income HAMAG Croatian SME agency HGSME high-growth small and medium-sized enterprise HITPOP Croatian enterprise training website HRD human resource development ISCED International Standard Classification of Education ICT information and communications technology IFC International Finance Corporation INSTAT Albanian Institute of Statistics IPA Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance IPPC Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control IPR intellectual property rights ISEF Information System for Electronic Filing IT information technology I&T innovation and technology KBRA Kosovo Business Registration Agency KCB Kosovo Central Bank KPI key public infrastructure KTP Knowledge Transfer Partnership List of abbreviations

Transcript of List of abbreviations - OECD.org · 252 Annex1 AAEF AlbanianAmericanEnterpriseFund ACE...

252

Annex 1

AAEF Albanian American Enterprise FundACE Action for Co-operation in Economics (EU Phare Programme)APIU Croatian export and investment promotion agencyAPPRM Agency for Promotion of Entrepreneurship (FYR Macedonia)BAS Business Advisory ServiceBHEPA Export Council and Export Promotion AgencyBIC Business Information CentreBICRO Business Innovation Centre of CroatiaBRA Business Registration Agency (Serbia)CAR capital adequacy ratioCIT corporate income taxCIP Competitiveness and Innovation ProgrammeEAR European Agency for ReconstructionEBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and DevelopmentEC DG ENTR European Commission’s Directorate-General for Enterprise and IndustryEEN Enterprise Europe NetworkEFSE European Fund for South-Eastern EuropeEICC European Information and Communication CentreEIICM European Information and Innovation Centre in MacedoniaEPPA Enterprise Policy Performance AssessmentsETF European Training FoundationEU European UnionFDI foreign direct investmentFINA Croatian National Financial AgencyFYR Macedonia the Former Yugoslav Republic of MacedoniaGDP gross domestic productGEM Global Entrepreneurship MonitorGNI gross national incomeHAMAG Croatian SME agencyHGSME high-growth small and medium-sized enterpriseHITPOP Croatian enterprise training websiteHRD human resource developmentISCED International Standard Classification of EducationICT information and communications technologyIFC International Finance CorporationINSTAT Albanian Institute of StatisticsIPA Instrument for Pre-Accession AssistanceIPPC Integrated Pollution Prevention and ControlIPR intellectual property rightsISEF Information System for Electronic FilingIT information technologyI&T innovation and technologyKBRA Kosovo Business Registration AgencyKCB Kosovo Central BankKPI key public infrastructureKTP Knowledge Transfer Partnership

List of abbreviations

253

MEF Montenegrin Employers’ FederationMELE Ministry of Economy, Labour and EntrepreneurshipMETE Ministry of Economy,Trade and Energy (Albania)METR marginal effective tax rateMoE Ministry of Economy (FYR Macedonia)MoERD Ministry of Economy and Regional Development (Serbia)NBMFI non-bank microfinance institutionNCC National Competitiveness CouncilNRC National Registration Centre (Albania)NECC National Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness CouncilOECD Organisation of Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentOECD PSD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Private Sector Development

DivisionPIT personal income taxPPC public/private consultationPPD public-private dialogueR&D research and developmentRDA regional development agencyRIA regulatory impact analysisSAA Stability and Association AgreementsSBA European Small Business ActSEE South East EuropeSME small and medium-sized enterpriseSIEPA Serbia Investment and Export Promotion AgencySMEDA Directorate for Development of Small and Medium Sized Enterprise (Montenegro)SMEPED SME Policy Enhancement and DeliveryTAC Training and ConsultancyTAM TurnAround ManagementTNA Training Needs AnalysisUNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeVAT value added taxWBC Western Balkan countries (including Kosovo under UNSCR 1244/99)YES Youth Entrepreneurial Service

254

Annex 2

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

Polic

yfr

amew

ork

fore

ntre

pren

euria

llea

rnin

g(E

L)3

1.1

Polic

ypa

rtne

rshi

p

Nostructured

co-

operationbetween

public,privateandnon-

governmentalsectors

onEL.

Anongoingnational

dialogue

with

view

tostructureco-operation

betweenpublic,private

andnon-governmental

sectorson

EL.

AnationalEL

partnershiphasbeen

establishedbetween

public,privateandnon-

governmentalsectorsto

prom

oteentrepreneurial

learning.

Statefundsensure

sustainablecontributionof

ELpartnershiptonational

developm

ents(e.g.

administrativesupport,

workplan,capacity

developm

ent).

AnEL

nationalpartnershipadviseson

arangeofnationalstrategies

(education,

employment,SM

E,R&

D)andactionplans.

1

1.2

Polic

ysu

ppor

tre

sour

ces

Nosystem

aticallocation

offinancialresourcesto

supportELpolicy

implem

entation.

Pilotprojectsfunds

available(public

and/or

private)forEL

developm

ents(e.g.

teachertraining,

teaching

materials).

Dialogue

ongoing

betweenstate

authorities,private

sectorandphilanthropic

societiesforco-

ordinatedfinancial

supportforsystem

iclife-long

EL.

Nationalfunds

allocated

forsystemicEL

developm

entand

detailed

inannualeducation

budgetarycommitm

ents.

FinancialallocationforELclearly

identifiablewithinnationaleducation

budget.

NationalELdevelopm

entsincludefinancial

commitm

entfrompublic-private

partnership.

1

1.3

Polic

yel

abor

atio

npr

oces

s

Noevidence

ofclearly

identifiableor

articulated

policy

guidance

availablefor

theeducationsector.

ELrecognised

asdeveloping

feature

withineducationpolicy

instruments.

Policyinstruments

specifictoeach

levelof

theeducationsystem

clearly

identifyEL

asa

prioritydevelopm

ent

area

with

duereference

tocurriculum

,teacher

trainingandschool

governance.

ELpolicylinkagesare

clearly

articulated

with

SME,em

ploymentand

R&Dpolicydocuments.

Nationaleconomicdevelopm

entplan

includes

aspecificchapteronlife-long

ELdetailing

specificandcomplimentary

objectives

forthe

various

parts

oftheEL

framew

ork.

1

1.4

Mon

itorin

gan

dev

alua

tion

Nosystem

inplaceto

monitorand

evaluateEL

activities.

Baselinedataisbeing

collected

onEL

projects

andisregistered

within

anationaldatabase.

Documentedevidence

ofevaluationofEL

activity

ateach

levelofthe

educationsystem

Anannualreportis

publishedandmade

availableon-line

detailing

keydevelopm

entsinEL

inthecountry,including

lessonslearntand

identificationofgood

practice.

Recommendations

frommonitoringand

evaluationofEL

areintegrated

intofurther

policyreformsandactionplans.

1

1.EN

TREP

REN

EURSH

IPED

UC

AT

ION

AN

DT

RA

ININ

G

Th

eSM

EPo

licy

Index

Tool

255

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

Low

erse

cond

ary

educ

atio

n(IS

CED

2)2

1.5

*ISC

ED2

Orga

nisa

tion

Traditionalteaching

and

learning

environm

ent

prevailswith

little

orno

optionforflexible

teaching

andlearning

arrangem

ents

conducivetoprom

oting

entrepreneurshipas

akeycompetence(e.g.

opportunity

identification,initiative,

creativity,innovation

andrisktaking

bypupils)w

ithinlower

secondaryschools.

Someevidence

ofmore

flexibleteaching

andlearning

arrangem

entsconduciveto

prom

otingentrepreneurship

asakeycompetence(e.g.

opportunityidentification,

initiative,creativity,

innovationandrisktaking

bypupils)w

ithinlower

secondaryschools.

Evidence

insomelower

secondaryschoolsofschool

co-operationwith

local

communities

andenterprises

reportedinbaselinedata

(Monitoringandevaluation

sub-indicator)

Atleast5%oflowersecondary

schoolsengagedinflexible

teaching

andlearning

arrangem

entsconduciveto

prom

otingentrepreneurshipas

akeycompetence(e.g.

opportunityidentification,

initiative,creativity,innovation

andrisktaking

bypupils)w

ithin

lowersecondaryschools.This

includes

directco-operation

betweentheschools,local

communities

andlocal

enterprises.

Evidence

forthislevelw

illbe

draw

nfromschools’Annual

Reports

(Monitoringand

evaluationsub-indicator)

Regulatoryframew

orkin

placewhich

provides

for

flexibleteaching

and

learning

arrangem

ents

which

prom

ote

entrepreneurshipas

akey

competence(e.g.

opportunityidentification,

initiative,creativity,

innovation,andrisktaking

bypupils)w

ithinlower

secondaryschools.This

includes

co-operation

betweenlowersecondary

schools,localcom

munities

andlocalenterprises.

Atleast50%

oflowersecondary

schoolsmeetthe

regulatory

framew

orkforflexibleteaching

andlearning

arrangem

entswhich

prom

oteentrepreneurshipas

akeycompetence(e.g.opportunity

identification,initiative,creativity,

innovation,andrisktaking

bypupils)w

ithinlowersecondary

schools.Thisincludes

directco-

operationbetweentheschools,

localcom

munities

andlocal

enterprises.

Evidence

forthislevelw

illbe

draw

nfromschools’Annual

Reports

(Monitoringand

evaluationsub-indicator)

1

1.6

*ISC

ED2

Key

com

pete

nce

ELinlowersecondary

educationisconfined

toad-hoc

projectswhich

arenotpartof

mainstream

education

curricula.

ELinlowersecondary

educationisconfined

toschool-based

individual

initiatives

which

areknow

ntotheeducationauthorities.

ELinlowersecondary

educationcomprises

entrepreneurshipkey

competenceprovisions

asan

integralfeatureofthenational

curriculum

.

ELinlowersecondary

educationcomprises

entrepreneurshipkey

competenceprovisions

ofthenationalcurriculum

andisincluded

inteaching

plansofatleast25%

oflowersecondaryschools.

Evidence

forthislevelw

illbe

draw

nfromschools’

AnnualReports

(Monitoringandevaluation

sub-indicator).

ELinlowersecondaryeducation

comprises

entrepreneurshipkey

competenceprovisions

ofthe

nationalcurriculum

andis

included

inteaching

plansofat

least50%

oflowersecondary

schools.Evidence

forthislevel

willbe

draw

nfromschools’

AnnualReports

(Monitoringand

evaluationsub-indicator)

1

1.7

*ISC

ED2

NoELmaterials,staff

expertise

nor

partnershipswith

local

civic/enterprise

communities.

Evidence

ofdevelopm

entof

EL:a)teachingmaterialsand

b)teachertrainingwhich

includes

entrepreneurshipas

akeycompetence.

Atleast5%oflowersecondary

schoolshave

ELmaterialand

staffknowledgeandskillsfor

teaching

entrepreneurshipas

akeycompetence.

Atleast25%

oflower

secondaryschoolshave

ELmaterialand

staff

know

ledgeandskillsfor

teaching

entrepreneurship

asakeycompetence.

Atleast50%

oflowersecondary

schoolshave

ELmaterialand

staff

know

ledgeandskillsforteaching

entrepreneurshipas

akey

competence.

1

256

Annex 2Up

pers

econ

dary

educ

atio

n(IS

CED

3)2

1.8

*ISC

ED3

Orga

nisa

tion

Traditionalteaching

and

learning

environm

ent

prevailswith

little

orno

optionforflexible

teaching

andlearning

arrangem

ents

conducivetoprom

oting

entrepreneurshipas

akeycompetence(e.g.

opportunity

identification,initiative,

creativity,innovation

andrisktaking

bypupils)and

more

specificbusiness

skills**withinupper

secondaryschools.

Someevidence

ofmore

flexibleteaching

andlearning

arrangem

entsconduciveto

prom

otingentrepreneurship

asakeycompetence(e.g.

opportunityidentification,

initiative,creativity,

innovation,risktaking

bypupils)and

morespecific

business

skills**withinupper

secondaryschools.

Evidence

insomeupper

secondaryschoolsofschool

co-operationwith

local

communities

andenterprises

reportedinbaselinedata

(Monitoringandevaluation

sub-indicator)

Atleast25%

ofupper

secondaryschoolsengagedin

flexibleteaching

andlearning

arrangem

entsconduciveto

prom

otingentrepreneurshipas

akeycompetence(e.g.

opportunityidentification,

initiative,creativity,innovation,

risktaking

bypupils)and

more

specificbusiness

skills**This

includes

directco-operation

betweentheschools,local

communities

andlocal

enterprises.

Evidence

forthislevelw

illbe

draw

nfromschools’Annual

Reports

(Monitoringand

evaluationsub-indicator).

Regulatoryframew

orkin

placewhich

provides

for

flexibleteaching

and

learning

arrangem

ents

conducivetoprom

oting

entrepreneurshipas

akey

competence(e.g.

opportunityidentification,

initiative,creativity,

innovation,risktaking

bypupils)and

morespecific

business

skills**.This

includes

directco-

operationbetweenthe

schools,localcom

munities

andlocalenterprises.

Atleast70%

ofuppersecondary

schoolsmeetthe

regulatory

framew

orkforflexibleteaching

andlearning

arrangem

ents

conducivetoprom

oting

entrepreneurshipas

akey

competence(e.g.opportunity

identification,initiative,creativity,

innovation,risktaking

bypupils)

andmorespecificbusiness

skills**.Thisincludes

directco-

operationbetweentheschools,

localcom

munities

andlocal

enterprises.

Evidence

forthislevelw

illbe

draw

nfromschools’Annual

Reports

(Monitoringand

evaluationsub-indicator).

1

1.9

*ISC

ED3

Entr

epre

neur

ial

lear

ning

ELinuppersecondary

education

(entrepreneurshipkey

competenceand

business

skills**)is

confined

toad-hoc

projectswhich

arenot

partofmainstream

educationcurricula.

ELinuppersecondary

education(entrepreneurship

keycompetenceand

business

skills**)isconfined

toschool-based

individual

initiatives

which

areknow

ntotheeducationauthorities.

EL(entrepreneurshipkey

competenceandbusiness

skills**)isan

integralfeatureof

thenationalcurriculum

which

specifies

entrepreneurshipkey

competenceandelectiveEL

subjects.

EL(asakeycompetence

andbusiness

skills**)is

included

inteaching

plans

ofatleast50%

ofupper

secondaryschools.

Evidence

forthislevelw

illbe

draw

nfromschools’

AnnualReports

(Monitoring

andevaluationsub-

indicator).

EL(asakeycompetenceand

business

skills**)isincluded

inteaching

plansinatleast70%

ofuppersecondaryschools.

Evidence

forthislevelw

illbe

draw

nfromschools’Annual

Reports

(Monitoringand

evaluationsub-indicator).

1

1.10

*ISC

ED3

Lear

ning

envi

ronm

ent

NoEL

materials,staff

expertise

nor

partnershipswith

local

civic/enterprise

communities.

ELmaterialsandteacher

trainingunderdevelopment

byway

ofstrategicpilotsand

which

includestructured

co-

operationbetweenupper

secondaryschools,local

communities

andenterprise.

Atleast25%

ofupper

secondaryschoolsare

employingEL

material,with

stafftrained

for

entrepreneurshipkey

competenceandbusiness

skills.**Theschoolshave

structured

partnershipswith

localcom

munities

and

enterprise.

Atleast50%

ofupper

secondaryschoolsare

employed

ELmaterial,with

stafftrained

for

entrepreneurshipkey

competenceandbusiness

skillsdevelopm

ent.**The

schoolshave

structured

partnershipswith

local

communities

and

enterprise.

Atleast70%

ofuppersecondary

schoolsareem

ployingEL

material,with

stafftrained

for

entrepreneurshipkeycompetence

andbusiness

skills

developm

ent.**The

schoolshave

structured

partnershipswith

local

communities

andenterprise.

1

*Thisindicatorisparticularly

concernedwith

prom

otingteaching

andlearning

arrangem

entswhich

willcontributetoentrepreneurialm

indsetsandbehaviour(curiosity,creativity,autonom

y,initiative,team

spirit)inkeepingwith

therecommendations

oftheEU’sOsloAgenda.

**AtISCEDLevel3

education,entrepreneurshipas

akeycompetenceshouldcontinue

tobe

anintegralpartofthenationalcurriculum

reinforcingthecontributionmadeatISCEDlevel2.AtISCED

3level,

theentrepreneurshipkeycompetencecouldbe

supplementedwith

harderbusiness

skills(e.g.businessplanning,start-up

training,marketing,book-keeping)developed

throughbusiness

relatedstudies

asacompulsoryoras

anelectivesubjectw

ithinthecurriculum

.

257

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

Good

prac

tice

1

1.11

*Go

odpr

actic

e

Thereisno

system

atic

exchange

ofgood

practicebetween

lifelongEL

providers.

Anationalnetworkof

life-long

ELproviders

meetson

aregular

basistoexchange

good

practice.

Exam

ples

ofadaptedEL

good

practice(dom

estic

and/orinternational)are

beingpilotedinthe

country.

Results

ofdomestic

good

practicearebeing

dissem

inated

nationally

(at

leastone

annualevent).

Withinthereporting

period,atleastone

domestic

good

practicehasbeen

transferred

toanothereducationand

trainingenvironm

entinaneighbouring

country,European

Unionorbeyond.

1

*Notethatthisindicatoriscumulativei.e.eachrankingrequiresfulfilmentofthe

earlierlevelsoftheindicator.

Non-

form

alen

trep

rene

uria

llea

rnin

g1

1.12

Non

form

alle

arni

ng

Exam

ples

ofactions

toprom

otenon-formalEL

(privatelyand/orpublicly

supported).

Aworking

group

monitorsnon-formalEL

aspartofnationalEL

strategy

andadviseson

improvem

ents.

Evidence

ofatleastone

quarterly,high-level

presscoverage

(national

newspaperorTV)ofEL

policyordelivery.

Exam

ples

ofagreem

ents

establishedbetween

publicauthorities,

enterprise,community

groups

orphilanthropic

organisations

todevelop

entrepreneurialspirit

andskillsacross

society

with

particularreference

tochildrenandyoung

people.

Atleastone

annual,high-

profile

eventatnational

leveltoprom

ote

awarenessandinformation

onbroaderEL(formaland

non-formal)toshow

-case

successfulprojects.

High-profileeventincludes

nationalrecognitionor

awards

forELpractice.

Transferofknow

-how

:principles

orpracticefromatleast2

ofthenon-formal

show

-caseprojectsfromtheprevious

year’shigh

profile

eventareintegrated

into

otherELenvironm

entsnationalor

internationally.

1

258

Annex 2

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

2.1

Issu

ing

ofco

mpa

nyre

gist

ratio

nce

rtifi

cate

2

2.1.

1

Num

bero

fday

sfo

robt

aini

ngco

mpa

nyre

gist

ratio

nce

rtifi

cate

Registrationinmore

than

30days.

Registrationtakesmore

than

15days,butless

than

30days.

Registrationtakesmore

than

5days,lessthan

15days.

Registrationtakesless

than

5days,butmorethan

1day

Registrationin1day.

1

2.1.

2

Num

bero

fad

min

istr

ativ

est

eps

for

obta

inin

gth

eco

mpa

nyre

gist

ratio

nce

rtifi

cate

Registrationrequires

morethan

10administrativesteps.

Registrationrequires8-

9administrativesteps.

Registrationrequires5-

7administrativesteps.

Registrationrequires2-4

administrativesteps.

Registrationrequires1administrativestep.

1

2.1.

3

Offic

ialc

osto

fob

tain

ing

the

com

pany

regi

stra

tion

cert

ifica

te

Morethan

Euro250

Less

than

Euro250,

morethan

Euro150

Less

than

Euro150,

morethan

Euro50

Less

than

Euro50,m

ore

than

Euro10

Less

than

Euro10

2

Com

pany

Iden

tific

atio

nNu

mbe

rs1

2.1.

4

Adm

inis

trat

ive

iden

tific

atio

nnu

mbe

rsin

deal

ing

with

the

publ

icad

min

istr

atio

n

5registrations

and

identificationnumbers

indealingwith

different

administrative

authorities

(statistical

office,custom

s,labour

office,taxofficeetc.).

4identificationnumbers

indealingwith

different

administrative

authorities.Som

eregistrations

merged

3identificationnumbers

indealingwith

different

administrative

authorities.Halfof

registrations

merged.

2identificationnumbersin

dealingwith

different

administrativeauthorities.

Mostofregistrations

merged.

Singleidentificationnumberindealingwith

allstandardfunctions

ofpublic

administration-singleregistrationprocess.

1

2.1.

5

Num

bero

fday

sfo

rcom

puls

ory

com

pany

iden

tific

atio

nnu

mbe

r(s)

Allnum

bersinmore

than

30days.

Allnum

bersinmore

than

15days,butless

than

30days.

Allnum

berinmorethan

5days,lessthan

15days.

Allnum

bersinless

than

5days,butmorethan

1day

Allnum

bersinthesameday.

1

2C

HEA

PER

AN

DFA

ST

ERSTA

RT-

UP

259

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

Com

plet

ion

ofth

eov

eral

lreg

istr

atio

npr

oces

san

den

try

inop

erat

ions

1

2.1.

6

Num

bero

fday

sfo

rcom

plet

ing

the

over

allr

egis

trat

ion

proc

ess,

incl

udin

gco

mpu

lsor

ylic

ence

sfo

rsta

ndar

dbu

sine

ssac

tiviti

es(W

BCo

stof

Doin

gBu

sine

ssIn

dex)

Registrationtakes

morethan

30days.

Registrationtakes

morethan

15days,but

less

than

30days.

Registrationtakes

morethan

5days,less

than

15days.

Registrationtakesless

than

5days,butmore

than

1day

Registrationtakes1

day.

1

2.1.

7

Num

bero

fste

psfo

rcom

plet

ing

the

over

allr

egis

trat

ion

proc

ess,

incl

udin

gco

mpu

lsor

ylic

ence

sfo

rsta

ndar

dbu

sine

ssac

tiviti

es(W

BCo

stof

Doin

gBu

sine

ssIn

dex)

Registrationrequires

morethan

10administrativesteps.

Registrationrequires

8-9administrative

steps.

Registrationrequires

5-7administrative

steps.

Registrationrequires

2-4administrative

steps.

One-stop-shop.

1

2.1.

8Si

lenc

eis

cons

enta

pplie

dto

com

pany

regi

stra

tion

proc

edur

esSilenceisconsentis

notapplied

Silenceisconsentis

system

aticallyapplied

2

2.1.

9Co

sts

conn

ecte

dw

ithre

gist

ratio

n(%

ofGN

Iper

capi

ta)-

(WB

Cost

ofDo

ing

Busi

ness

Inde

x)

Costsaremorethan

10%ofGN

Ipercapita.

Costsarebetween5%

and10%ofGN

Iper

capita.

Costsarebetween

2.5%

and5%

ofGN

Ipercapita.

Costsarebelow2.5%

ofGN

Ipercapita.

Costsareminimal

(close

to0ofGN

Iper

capita).

2

2.1.

10M

inim

umca

pita

lreq

uire

men

ts(%

ofGN

Ipe

rcap

ita)-

(WB

Cost

ofDo

ing

Busi

ness

Inde

x)

Morethan

40%ofGN

Ipercapita.

Between20%and

40%ofGN

Ipercapita.

Between10%and

20%ofGN

Ipercapita.

Less

than

10%ofGN

Ipercapita.

Nominimum

capital

requirementsfor

generalpartnerships

with

personalliability.

2

2.2

Incr

ease

on-l

ine

acce

ssfo

rreg

istr

atio

n1

2.2.

1On

-lin

ere

gist

ratio

n

Thegovernmenthas

nottaken

anysteps

towards

the

introductionofon-line

registration.

Evaluationofexisting

administrative

procedures

and

detailedproposalsfor

theintroductionofon-

lineregistration.

Budgetprovisions

and

pilotproject.

Lawon

online

registration,action

plan

andbudget

provisions

approved.

Designationof

competentauthority.

Level3

+solid

evidence

ofimplem

entationofon-

lineregistrationsystem

availableonlyinsome

regions.

Level4

+complete

implem

entationofon-

lineregistrationsystem

fully

integrated

with

otherservicesofe-

governmentand

availablethroughout

thecountry.On

line

registrationappliesto

allphasesofthe

company

registration

process

1

260

Annex 2Le

vel1

Leve

l2Le

vel3

Leve

l4Le

vel5

Wei

ghtf

orsu

b-di

men

sion

orin

dica

tor

(1-3

)

2.3

Craf

treg

istr

atio

n

Craf

treg

istr

atio

nce

rtifi

cate

2

2.3.

1Nu

mbe

rofd

ays

foro

btai

ning

craf

tre

gist

ratio

nce

rtifi

cate

Registrationinmore

than

30days.

Registrationtakes

morethan

15days,but

less

than

30days.

Registrationtakes

morethan

5days,less

than

15days.

Registrationtakesless

than

5days,butmore

than

1day

Registrationin1day.

1

2.3.

2Nu

mbe

rofa

dmin

istr

ativ

est

eps

for

obta

inin

gth

ecr

aftr

egis

trat

ion

cert

ifica

te

Registrationrequires

morethan

10administrativesteps.

Registrationrequires

8-9administrative

steps.

Registrationrequires

5-7administrative

steps.

Registrationrequires

2-4administrative

steps.

Registrationrequires1

administrativestep.

1

2.3.

3Of

ficia

lcos

tofo

btai

ning

the

craf

tre

gist

ratio

nce

rtifi

cate

Morethan

Euro250

Less

than

Euro250,

morethan

Euro150

Less

than

Euro150,

morethan

Euro50

Less

than

Euro50,

morethan

Euro10

Less

than

Euro10

2

Craf

tide

ntifi

catio

nnu

mbe

rs1

2.3.

4Ad

min

istr

ativ

eid

entif

icat

ion

num

bers

inde

alin

gw

ithth

epu

blic

adm

inis

trat

ion

5registrations

and

identificationnumbers

indealingwith

differentadministrative

authorities

(statistical

office,custom

s,labour

office,taxofficeetc.).

4identification

numbersindealing

with

different

administrative

authorities.Som

eregistrations

merged.

3identification

numbersindealing

with

different

administrative

authorities.Halfof

registrations

merged.

2identification

numbersindealing

with

different

administrative

authorities.M

ostof

registrations

merged.

Singleidentification

numberindealingwith

allstandardfunctions

ofpublic

administration-single

registrationprocess.

1

2.3.

5Nu

mbe

rofd

ays

forc

ompu

lsor

ycr

aft

iden

tific

atio

nnu

mbe

r(s)

Allnum

bersinmore

than

30days.

Allnum

bersinmore

than

15days,butless

than

30days.

Allnum

berinmore

than

5days,lessthan

15days.

Allnum

bersinless

than

5days,butmore

than

1day

Allnum

bersinthe

sameday.

1

261

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

3.1

Sim

plifi

catio

nof

SME

legi

slat

ion

ofSM

Ere

late

dle

gisl

atio

nan

dre

gula

tion

3

Revi

ewof

the

curr

entl

egis

latio

n

3.1.

1St

rate

gyfo

rleg

isla

tive

and

adm

inis

trat

ive

sim

plifi

catio

n

Noformalised

strategy

forlegislativeand

administrative

simplification,

includingsector

strategies,exists.

Legislativeand

administrative

simplificationstrategy

isunderelaboration.

Multi-yearlegislative

andadministrative

simplificationstrategy

forcurrentperiodis

approved

bythe

government,following

aprocessof

consultationwith

stakeholders,and

inparticularw

iththe

privatesectorandcivil

society.Thestrategy

isatan

initialstageof

implem

entation.

Solid

evidence

ofimplem

entationofthe

legislativeand

administrative

simplificationstrategy

with

indicationofkey

targetsachieved

and

assignments

completed.

Apro-active,comprehensive

legislativeandadministrative

simplificationstrategy

isputin

placeaftera

wide-consultation

process.Thestrategy

incorporates

actionplans

coveringkeyareasofthe

regulatoryreform

agenda.

Thereissignificantevidence

thatallcom

ponentsofthe

strategy

have

been

implem

ented,as

demonstrated

bytim

e-boundtargetsachieved

andnumberofassignm

ents

completed.

3

3.1.

2Re

view

and

sim

plifi

catio

nof

curr

entl

egis

latio

n

Thereareno

plansto

review

andsimplify

currentprim

aryor

secondarylegislation

relatedtoenterprise

policy.

Therehasbeen

ad-hoc

activity

tosimplify

currententerprise

legislationandthe

governmenthas

plans

fora

system

aticreview

ofcurrentlegislation

relatedtoenterprise

policy.

Aconcreteplan

toreview

andsimplify

legislationrelatedto

enterprisepolicyhas

been

approved

and

institutions

incharge

have

been

identified.

Implem

entationofthe

plan

toreview

and

simplify

legislation

relatedtoenterprise

policybeginningwith

thereview

ofmainly

primarylegislation

relatedtoenterprise

policy.

Legislativereview

well-

advanced

andextended

tosecondarylegislation.

2

3.1.

3El

imin

atio

nof

redu

ndan

tle

gisl

atio

nan

dre

gula

tions

(e.g

.reg

ulat

ory

guill

otin

e)

Thereareno

plansto

carryoutsystematic

eliminationof

redundantlegislation

andregulations.

Therehasbeen

ad-hoc

activity

tocarryout

eliminationof

redundantlegislation

andregulations.The

governmentisplanning

tocarryoutthis

exercise.

Aconcreteplan

tocarryoutsystematic

eliminationof

redundantlegislation

andregulations

has

been

approved

and

institutions

incharge

have

been

identified.

Implem

entationofthe

plan

underway,

coveringkeyareasof

mainlyprimary

legislationrelatedto

enterprisepolicy.

Regulatoryguillotineprocess

welladvancedandextended

tosecondarylegislation.

2

3BET

TER

LEG

ISLA

TIO

NA

ND

REG

ULA

TIO

N

262

Annex 2Le

vel1

Leve

l2Le

vel3

Leve

l4Le

vel5

Wei

ghtf

orsu

b-di

men

sion

orin

dica

tor

(1-3

)

Regu

lato

ryIm

pact

Anal

ysis

3.1.

4Us

eof

Regu

lato

ryIm

pact

Anal

ysis

(RIA

)

Nosystem

atic

regulatoryimpact

analysistargeted

atSM

Esexists.

Proposalfora

lawon

RIAforlegislationwith

impacton

SMEs.A

simplified,pilotRIA

programmeisbeing

used

incertainareasof

regulation.

Approvaloflawon

RIA.

Implem

entationofRIA

insomeSM

E-related

policyareas.

RIAon

SMEs

issystem

atically

implem

ented.

1

3.1.

5Ty

peof

Regu

lato

ryIm

pact

Anal

ysis

TheRIAappliedis

limitedinscopeandis

restrictedtosimplistic

techniques

(e.g.inter-

ministerialm

eetings,

consultationwith

interested

parties).

Thereisno

preceding

analysison

what

techniqueismost

applicableandtheRIA

processispoorly

structured.

RIAisbasedon

both

unsophisticated

and

sophisticated

(e.g.

cost-benefitanalysis,

cost-efficiency

analysis,realcase

pilots)techniques.

However,thereisno

structured

preceding

analysison

whattype

oftechniqueismost

applicableandtheRIA

processispoorly

structured.

Thetype

ofRIAapplied

istargeted

tothetype

oflegislationexam

ined

basedon

pre-defined

criteria.Accordingly,

sophisticated

techniques

areapplied.

Level3

+Thereis

someevidence

thatthe

outcom

esoftheRIA

have

been

used

tochange

orcancel

legislation.

Level4

+Thereisam

ple

evidence

thattheoutcom

esof

RIAhave

been

used

tochange

orcancellegislation.RIAisalso

appliedex-posttomeasurethe

impactoflegislationduringthe

implem

entationstage.

1

3.2

Sim

plify

rule

s1

3.2.

1Si

lenc

e-is

-con

sent

prin

cipl

eTheprincipleisnot

used

instandard

administrativepractice.

Evaluationofcurrent

procedures

and

detailedproposalson

theintroductionofthe

silence-is-consent

principle.

Approvaloflawon

silence-is-consent.

Solid

evidence

ofimplem

entationofthe

silence-is-consent

principleinkey

areas/sectorsofthe

administration.

Fullimplem

entationand

widespreaduseoftheprinciple

inmanyareas/sectorsofthe

administration.Regularreviews

(involvingbusiness

sector)to

identifynewareaswherethe

principlecouldbe

adopted.

1

263

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

3.3

Inst

itutio

nalf

ram

ewor

k3

3.3.

1In

ter-

gove

rnm

enta

lco-

ordi

natio

nin

polic

yel

abor

atio

n

Noinstitutionis

responsibleforSME

policyelaboration.

Severalinstitutions

are

responsibleforSME

policyelaborationand

they

have

overlapping

portfoliosandlim

ited

co-ordination.

Approvalfor

establishm

entofa

singleinstitutionin

charge

ofleadingand

co-ordinatingSM

Epolicyelaboration.

Singleinstitutionin

charge

ofSM

Epolicy

elaborationinplace

andfully

operational.

System

ofconsultation

with

theimplem

enting

agency

(ies)inplace

Level4

+effectivemechanism

ofpolicyco-ordinationinvolving

keyministries,agenciesand

localadm

inistrations

when

relevant.

1

3.3.

2SM

Ede

velo

pmen

tstr

ateg

yNo

SMEdevelopm

ent

strategy

exists.

SMEdevelopm

ent

strategy

isunder

elaboration.Review

ofexpiredSM

Estrategy

underw

ay.

Multi-yearSM

Edevelopm

entstrategy

forcurrentperiodis

approved

bythe

governmentand

atinitialstageof

implem

entation.

Budgetestablishedbut

entiretyoffundsnot

yetreceived.

Solid

evidence

ofimplem

entationofthe

SMEdevelopm

ent

strategy

with

indication

ofkeytargetsachieved

andassignments

completed.Entiretyof

fundsreceived

andin

processofbeing

disbursed.

Apro-activeSM

Edevelopm

ent

strategy

accompanied

bysignificantevidence

thatall

componentsofthestrategy

have

been

implem

ented,as

demonstratedby

time-bound

targetsachieved

andnumberof

assignmentscompleted.SME

strategy

hasademonstrated

impactandhasstrengthened

theSM

Esector.

1

3.3.

3SM

Epo

licy

impl

emen

tatio

nag

ency

oreq

uiva

lent

NoSM

Epolicy

implem

entationagency

with

anexecutiverole

(orequivalent)exists.

Government

consideringthe

establishm

entofan

SMEpolicy

implem

entationagency

(orequivalent).

SMEimplem

entation

agency

(orequivalent)

established.Staff,

structureandbudgetin

place.

Rangeofoutput

tobe

coveredby

agency

beingdrafted.

SMEimplem

entation

entityfully

operational

andcoversarangeof

activities

with

measurableoutcom

es.

Staffiscompleteand

therequiredexpertise

(economicandlegal)is

inplace.Solid

implem

entationrecord

ofSM

Estrategy

based

onachievem

entsof

time-boundtargetsas

detailedinactionplan.

SMEimplem

entationentityis

themainbody

for

implem

entationoftheSM

Estrategy,operatingwith

full

politicalsupport.Theentityhas

aclearreportingsystem

inplaceandarecognised

advocacy

andpolicyadvice

role.

Theentityiswell-funded,wide-

reaching,and

itsactivities

have

proven

tobe

effectivein

supportingSM

Edevelopm

ent

with

measureableoutcom

es.

1

264

Annex 2

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

4.1

Trai

ning

need

san

alys

ispo

licy

(TNA

)

SmallbusinessTNAdoes

notexistorisbasedon

‘ad

hoc’surveysonly.

Thereisno

regularand

system

aticcollectionof

dataon

thetrainingneeds

ortrainingconsum

ptionin

thesm

allbusiness

community.

Government,social

partnersandbusiness

community

areindialogue

with

view

toestablishing

asystem

aticTNAframew

ork

forthe

smallbusiness

community.

AnationalTNA

framew

orkhas

been

agreed

between

government,socialpartners,and

business

community

with

particularreference

toeconom

icgrow

thsectors.

TheTNAframew

orkidentifiesa)

skillweaknessesinthe

workforce,b)skillgaps

andc)

futureskillrequirements.

Standarddatacollection

instrumentsandadata

managem

entsystemarein

placeas

partofawidernational

econom

icdevelopm

entplan.

TNAas

defined

byalife-

long

ELpolicyare

undertakeninatleast20%

ofsm

allbusinessesin

grow

thsectorsand

reportedpubliclyon

arecognised

websitefor

access

byenterprises,

trainingprovidersand

policymakers.

AnnualTNAisundertaken

inatleast40%

ofsm

all

businesses

ingrow

thsectorsandavailable

publiclyon

arecognised

websiteforaccessby

enterprises,training

providersandpolicy

makers.

3

*Evidenceforthisindicatorw

illbe

takenfromenterprisesurvey-based

data.

4.2

Qual

ityas

sura

nce

Thereisno

national

framew

orkforquality

assuranceoftraining

delivered

tothesm

all

business

community.

Somecasesof

accreditationoftraining

programmes

andtraining

providersby

international

bodies.

Arangeofad

hoc

structures

andtools*are

beingused

todetermine

quality

oftrainingforthe

smallenterprise

community.

Dialogue

ongoingbetween

trainingproviders,em

ployers

andGovernmentregarding

quality,standards

and

accreditationoftraining

provisionforenterprises.Thisis

linkedtowiderEuropean

quality

assurancenetworks.

Anationalquality

assurancesystem

for

enterprisetrainingis

agreed

andisfully

operational.

Accreditedtraining

providersandprogrammes

areposted

onwebsitesand

informationboards

ofsm

all

enterprisesupport

agencies,public

andprivate

employmentagenciesand

trainingcentres.

Thenationalquality

assurancesystem

for

enterprisetrainingis

operationaland

fully

integrated

intoEuropean

Quality

Assurance

Fram

ework(tradeskills)

andrecognised

managem

enttraining

quality

assurancesystem

s.

2

4.3

Star

t-up

s*No

trainingavailablefor

start-ups.

20%ofnewlyregistered

start-upsinlast24

months

have

benefited

from

trainingandbusiness

advisoryservices

inthe

reporting

period(including

e-training).

40%ofnewlyregistered

start-

upsinlast24

monthshave

benefited

fromtrainingand

business

advisoryservices

inthe

reporting

period(includinge-

training).

60%ofnewlyregistered

start-upsinlast24

months

have

benefited

from

trainingandbusiness

advisoryservices

inthe

reporting

period(including

e-training).

Business

advisoryservices

forsmallenterprises

availableup

to36

months

afterstart-up.

80%ofnewlyregistered

start-upsinlast24

months

have

benefited

from

trainingandbusiness

advisoryservices

inthe

reporting

period(including

e-training)

Business

advisoryservices

forsmallenterprises

availableup

to36

months

afterstart-up.

1

*St

art-

uptr

aini

ngco

mpr

ises

man

agem

ent,

basi

cfin

ance

and

basi

cm

arke

ting

skill

ssu

ppor

ted

bypu

blic

and

priv

ate

fund

s

4.A

VA

ILA

BIL

ITY

OF

SK

ILLS

265

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

4.4

Ente

rpris

egr

owth

Nosystem

aticapproach

todevelopsm

allenterprise

human

resources

(knowledgeandskills)for

grow

ingbusinesses.

Know

ledgeandskills

developm

entforenterprise

grow

thhasbeen

agreed

asaprioritybetweenbusiness

community

and

governmentand

isregistered

innational

econom

icdevelopm

ent

plan.

Publicfinance

agreed

tosupporttrainingand

advisoryservices

for

grow

thenterprises.

Financialsupportfortrainingand

business

advisoryservices

for

grow

ingenterprises

available.(1)

Financialsupportislinkedto

clearcriteriatoallowenterprises

toapplyforsubsidies

tosupport

trainingandadvisoryservices

linkedtoenterprisegrow

th.

20%ofgrow

ingbusinesses

benefited

fromtrainingand

advisoryservices.

Morethan

50%ofgrow

ing

businesses

benefited

from

trainingandadvisory

services.

1

(1)Financialsupportw

illparticularly

addresstheknow

ledgeandcapacitiesrelatedtotheEU

regulatoryframew

ork.

4.5

Acce

ssto

trai

ning

Noon-line

publicregisterof

trainingprovidersand

trainingprogrammes

isavailable.

Registeroftraining

providersandtraining

programmes

broken

down

byregions,availableon

arecognised

website.

Smallbusinesstrainingprovision

isdevelopedbutislim

itedto

specifictowns

andregions.

Governmentsupportmeasures

prom

otedevelopm

entofon-line

trainingservices.

Good

trainingprovider

networkdevelopedacross

thecountry.(1)

Evidence

ofon-line

training

services

developing

for

smallbusinesscommunity.

Good

trainingprovider

networkdevelopedacross

thecountry.

Dataon

on-line

training

acquiredby

enterprises

istracked

byTNAsystem

and

evaluatedas

partof

nationalentrepreneurship

learning

policy

improvem

ents.

1

(1)Informationon

trainingprovidersavailablewithineconom

icdevelopm

entdepartmentsoflocal/regionaladm

inistrationoffices.

266

Annex 2

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

5.1

Inte

ract

ion

with

gove

rnm

ents

ervi

ces

1

5.1.

1Ta

xre

turn

sTaxreturnscannotbe

filed

on-line.

Governmentisconsidering

proposalstoallowforon-

linefilingoftaxreturns.

Pilotproject.

Approvaloflegislationand

budgetaryprovisions.

Developm

entofsoftware.

Early

phaseofimplem

entation.

Taxreturnscanbe

filed

on-line,

butthe

softw

areallowsonlyfor

alim

itednumberofoperations.

Level4

+thesoftw

are

allowsforcredit/debit

compensationwhen

availableinthecountry.

1

5.1.

2So

cial

secu

rity

retu

rns

Socialsecurityreturns

cannotbe

filed

on-line.

Governmentisconsidering

proposalstoallowforon-

linefilingofsocialsecurity

returns.Pilotproject.

Approvaloflegislationand

budgetaryprovisions.

Developm

entofsoftware.

Early

phaseofimplem

entation.

Socialsecurityreturnscanbe

filed

on-line,butthesoftw

are

allowsonlyfora

limitednumber

ofoperations.

Level4

+thesoftw

are

allowsforcredit/debit

compensationwhen

availableinthecountry.

1

5.1.

3Re

port

ing

onen

terp

rise

stat

istic

s

Reporting

onenterprise

statisticscannotbe

filed

on-line.

Governmentisconsidering

proposalstoallowforon-

linereporting

onenterprise

statistics.Pilotproject.

Approvaloflegislationand

budgetaryprovisions.

Developm

entofsoftware.

Early

phaseofimplem

entation.

Reporting

onenterprise

statisticscanbe

filed

on-line,

butthe

softw

areallowsonlyfor

alim

itednumberofoperations.

Advanced

phaseof

implem

entation+softw

are

allowsforw

iderangeof

operations.

1

5.1.

4

Exte

nsio

nto

othe

rser

vice

s(i.

e.pe

nsio

ns,

proc

urem

ent,

cada

stre

,etc

.)

Otherservicescannotbe

filed

on-line.

Governmentisconsidering

proposalstoallowforon-

linefilingofotherservices.

Pilotproject.

Approvaloflegislationand

budgetaryprovisions.

Developm

entofsoftware.

Early

phaseofimplem

entation.

Otherservicescanbe

filed

on-

line,butthe

softw

areallows

onlyfora

limitednumberof

operations.

Level4

+thesoftw

are

allowsforcredit/debit

compensationwhen

availableinthecountry.

1

5.2

Info

rmat

ion

2

5.2.

1On

-lin

ein

form

atio

nfo

rSM

Es

Noon-line

information

availableon

keyareasof

interestforSMEs

(i.e.tax,

labour,standard

regulations).

SomeSM

E-specific

informationcanbe

found

on-line,buton

different

portals.

Initialstageofdevelopm

ent

ofSM

Ededicatedportal

limitedinformationavailable

on-line

nopossibilityof

interaction.

SMEdedicatedportal

established:asignificant

amountofinformationis

availableon-line

anditis

regularly

updatedinteraction

limitedtorequestof

information.

Level4

+SM

E-specific

singleportalallows

interaction(requestof

informationapplications

tax

returns)betweenSM

Esand

theadministration.

1

5.2.

2Qu

ality

ofon

-lin

epo

rtal

Existenceofon-line

portal

unknow

ntoSM

Ecommunity.Informationis

notupdated

ormaintained.

On-line

portalsarenot

easilyaccessibleby

the

SMEcommunity.Portalis

notuser-friendly.

Informationisupdatedand

maintainedon

anad

hoc

basis.

On-line

portalsare

accessibletoSM

Ecommunity.Portalis

regularly

updatedand

maintained.

Level3

+portalisuserfriendly.

Level4

+Portaloffers

informationinlocal

languages,Englishand

language

ofthemost

presentforeign

investor.

1

5.IM

PRO

VIN

GO

N-L

INE

AC

CES

S

267

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

6.1

Expo

rtpr

omot

ion

prog

ram

mes

Noexportprom

otion

programmes

exist.

Exportprom

otion

programmes

under

consideration/somepilot

programmes

inplace,

limitedfundingavailable

andno

co-ordination

betweenprogrammes.

Newprogrammes

approved.

Programmes

arelargely

funded

bydonorcountries.

Co-ordinationbetween

programmes.Basictrade

informationprovided

and

sometrade

prom

otion

activities

(trademissions,

countryrepresentationat

majortrade

fairs)inplace,

butlimitedsupportgiven

toasm

allnum

berofSMEs.

Exportprom

otionprogrammes

areadequatelyfunded

butdo

notcom

pletelyprovideforallof

thefollowing:trade

policy

informationandcommercial

intelligence,exportprom

otion

andmarketing,trade

fair

participation,product

developm

entand

financial

services

andtraining.

Rangeofwell-funded

exportprom

otion

programmes

capableof

providingallofthe

dimensionsmentionedin

level4.

2

6.2

Enha

ncin

gSM

Eco

mpe

titiv

enes

s

Noprogrammes

orinitiatives

enhancing

SMEcompetitivenessin

place.

Competitiveness

programmes

under

consideration/initialpilot

programmes

inplace

Newcompetitiveness

programmes

approved.

Programmes

arelargely

funded

bydonorcountries,

coveringi.e.cluster

developm

ent,linkageswith

universities,foreign

partners,supplychain

trainingetc.

Relativelygood

rangeof

competitivenessprogrammes

inplace,adequatelyfunded,but

limitedco-ordinationwith

other

policyareas(science

and

technology,tax

incentives

for

R&D,educationandtraining,

etc.)

Rangeofwell-funded

exportcompetitiveness

programmes

capableof

providingallofthe

dimensionsmentionedin

level3

and4with

effective

policyco-ordinationand

monitoringmechanism

sin

place.

2

6.3

Natio

nalS

ME

prom

otio

nev

ents

NationalSMEprom

otion

eventsoccuronan-ad

hocbasis.

Eventsarenot

open

totheentireSM

Estakeholdercom

munity

andcovera

limited

numberofsectors.

NationalSMEprom

otion

eventsinunder

considerationby

the

government.Draft

calendarofeventsbeing

considered

byconcerned

ministry/agency.

NewnationalSME

prom

otioneventsapproved.

Evidence

thatrelevant

stakeholdershave

been

informed

ofandinvitedto

upcomingevents.

RegularhostingofnationalSME

prom

otioneventsoccur.

Evidence

thatawide-

representationofstakeholders

attend

andthateventscovera

widerangeofsectors.

Level4

+evidence

that

nationalSMEprom

otion

eventshave

enhanced

SME

competitiveness.

Regular

evaluationofpastevents

andplanning

offuture

eventsheldby

relevant

ministry/agency.

1

6M

ORE

OU

TO

FT

HE

SIN

GLE

MA

RK

ET

268

Annex 2

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

7.1

Adap

ttax

syst

emto

favo

urSM

Es

7.1.

1An

alys

isof

tax

burd

enon

SMEs

TheMinistryofFinance

does

notm

aintaina

corporateincometax

(CIT)and

apersonal

incometax(PIT)m

icro-

simulationmodelthat

distinguishtaxpayersby

turnover(gross

business

revenue)and

totalbusinessassets.

Nocurrentplans

toimplem

entsuch

models.

TheMinistryofFinance

does

notm

aintainCITand

PITmicro-simulation

modelsdistinguishing

taxpayersby

turnoverand

totalbusinessassets,but

istaking

stepstowards

implem

entation.

TheMinistryofFinance

does

notm

aintainCIT

andPITmicro-

simulationmodels

distinguishing

taxpayersby

turnover

andtotalbusiness

assets,butiscurrently

taking

stepsto

implem

entsuchmodels

anddatasetswithinone

year.

TheMinistryofFinancemaintains

CITandPITmicro-simulation

modelsdistinguishing

taxpayers

byturnoverandtotalbusiness

assets.Themodelsareroutinely

used

toanalysethecontributionof

SMEs

tototalcorporateincome

taxrevenue,andtotalpersonal

incometaxrevenueon

business

income,andtoanalysethetax

revenueimplications

oftaxreform

proposals.

Level4

plus

therequirementthat

analyses

ofSM

Eincometaxliability

arecarriedoutatthe

industry

(ratherthan

econom

y-wide)level

(requiring

datasetsstratifiedby

industry).

1

7.1.

2

Anal

ysis

ofta

xim

pedi

men

tsto

SME

inve

stm

ent

TheMinistryofFinance

does

notm

aintaina

marginaleffectivetax

rate(METR)modelthat

enablesanalysisoftax

effectson

(distortions

to)SMEinvestment

(versusinvestmentby

largefirms).Noplans

forimplem

entation.

TheMinistryofFinance

does

notm

aintainaMETR

modelthatenables

analysisoftaxeffectson

SMEinvestment,butis

taking

stepstowards

implem

entation.

TheMinistryofFinance

does

notm

aintaina

METRmodelthat

enablesanalysisoftax

effectson

SME

investment,butis

currently

taking

steps

towards

implem

entationwithin

oneyear.

TheMinistryofFinancemaintains

aMETRmodelthatenables

analysisoftaxeffectson

SME

investment.Themodelis

routinelyused

toanalysetax

distortions

toSM

Einvestmentand

theimplications

oftaxreform

proposals.

Level4

plus

therequirementthata)

theMETRmodelisdisaggregated

across

machineryandequipm

ent,

buildings,inventoryandland

andb)

METRresults

areexplainedin

summaryreports

forconsideration

byMinisterstohelpinform

policy-

making.

1

7.1.

3

Anal

ysis

ofta

xim

pedi

men

tsto

SME

equi

tyfin

ance

Studiesexam

ining

implications

for

enterprisefinancing

andinvestmentof

doubletaxationof

distributed

andretained

profithave

notbeen

undertakenby

tax

officials.

Studiesexam

ining

implications

forenterprise

financing

andinvestment

ofdoubletaxationof

distributed

andretained

profithave

been

undertakenby

tax

officials,w

ithstudy

findingsdocumentedand

reportedtoseniorMinistry

ofFinanceofficialsfor

discussion

and

consideration.

Level2

plus

the

requirementthatthe

analysisofdouble

taxationincludes

anassessmentofprosand

cons

(advantages,

disadvantages)andtax

revenueimplications

ofalternative‘integration’

system

storelieve

doubletaxationof

distributed

andretained

profits.

Level3

plus

therequirementthat

findingsofstudiesofdouble

taxationandalternative

integrationsystem

sareaddressed

incurrenttax

policyorinplanned

taxreform

overthenexttwo

years.

Level4

plus

therequirementthat

studiesofspecialtax

incentives

inthecurrentsystem,orplanned

for

introductionoverthenexttwo

years,orbeingproposed

bybusiness

(mainprovisions)to

increase

financing

ofsm

all

enterprises,havebeen

undertaken,

documented,andreportedtosenior

MinistryofFinanceofficials.Tax

revenueandefficiencyimplications

ofadjusting(possiblyeliminating)

theseincentives

have

been

considered

alongsideimplications

ofadjustingthedegree

ofdouble

taxationreliefinrespectof

distributed

andretained

profit.

1

7.TA

XA

TIO

NA

ND

FIN

AN

CIA

LM

AT

TER

S

269

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

7.1.

4An

alys

isof

tax

arbi

trag

eby

SME

owne

rs

Studieshave

notbeen

undertakenby

tax

officialsexam

ining

effectivetaxrateson

business

incomeof

closely-held

corporations

paidoutas

wages,ordividends,or

realised

ascapital

gains,toassess

possibletaxdistortions

toearnings

payout

policiesinsuch

cases.

Similarly,studies

have

notbeenundertaken

exam

iningpossibilities

forconversionof

taxablecapitalgains

(e.g.onrealproperty)

intotax-preferred

(possiblytax-exem

pt)

capitalgains

(e.g.on

shares).

Studieshave

been

undertakenby

taxofficials

exam

iningeffectivetax

rateson

business

income

ofclosely-held

corporations

paidoutas

wages,ordividends,or

realised

ascapitalgains,

toassess

possibletax

distortions

toearnings

payoutpolicies.

Level2

plus

the

requirementthat

studieshave

also

been

undertakenby

tax

officialsexam

ining

possibilitiesfor

conversion

oftaxable

capitalgains

intotax-

preferred(possibly

tax-exem

pt)capital

gains.

Level3

plus

therequirementthat

reports

have

been

prepared

consideringpossiblemeans

toaddresstaxarbitrage

byow

ners

ofclosely-heldcompanies.The

findingshave

been

documented

andreportedtoseniorMinistryof

Financeofficialsfordiscussion

andconsideration,butm

easures

have

notbeenadoptedtoaddress

themostcom

mon

formsoftax

arbitrage.

Level4

plus

therequirementthat

measureshave

been

adoptedto

addressthemostcom

mon

formsof

taxarbitrage.

1

7.1.

5

Anal

ysis

ofta

xim

pedi

men

tsto

risky

inve

stm

enti

nSM

Es

Possibleimpediments

toinvestmentinearly-

stage,high-risk

companies

ofalternativeloss-offset

rulesgoverninglim

itsto

taxdeductibilityof

business

losses,and

capitallosseson

shares,havenotbeen

analysed,docum

ented

anddiscussedam

ongst

seniortaxofficialsof

theMinistryofFinance.

Possibleimpedimentsto

investmentinearly-stage,

high-riskcompanies

ofalternativeloss-offset

rulesgoverninglim

itsto

taxdeductibilityof

business

losses,and

capitallosseson

shares,

have

been

analysed

with

findingsdocumentedand

reportedtoseniorMinistry

ofFinanceofficialsfor

discussion

and

consideration.

Level2,plusthe

requirementthattax-

planning

opportunities

underalternativeloss-

offsetprovisions

have

been

exam

ined

(taking

intoaccountlimits

totaxauditsurveillance

thatcanbe

carriedout

bythetax

administration),w

ithstudyfindingsreported

toseniorMinistryof

Financeofficialsfor

discussion

and

consideration.

Level3

plus

therequirementthat

mainfindingsofstudiesof

possibleimpedimentstorisk-

taking

(includinginvestmentin

equityshares),andpossibletax-

planning

opportunities,under

alternativeloss-offsetprovisions,

areaddressedincurrenttax

policy,and/orinplannedtax

reform

overthenexttwoyears.

Level4

plus

therequirementthat

followingtheadoptionoftaxreform

thatexpandsorlim

itsloss

offset

provisions,and/orbroadensor

contains

scopefortax-planning

around

losses,anex-post

evaluationiscarriedoutthat

exam

ines

implications

forrisk-

taking

andtax-planning.

1

270

Annex 2Le

vel1

Leve

l2Le

vel3

Leve

l4Le

vel5

Wei

ghtf

orsu

b-di

men

sion

orin

dica

tor

(1-3

)

7.1.

6

Anal

ysis

ofta

xco

mpl

ianc

eco

sts

forS

MEs

and

rem

edia

lta

xad

min

istr

atio

n

TheMinistryofFinance

(orTax

Administration)

hasnotassessedthe

averagecosttoSM

Esofcomplying

with

any

ofthemaintaxes

(currentdesign)

imposedby

central

government.

TheMinistryofFinance(or

TaxAdministration)has

assessed

theaveragecost

toSM

Esofcomplying

with

certainmaintaxes(e.g.

incometax,general

consum

ptiontax(VAT

orsalestax),intheircurrent

design)imposedby

centralgovernm

ent.

TheMinistryofFinance

(orTax

Administration)

hasassessed

the

averagecosttoSM

Esofcomplying

with

all

maintaxes(current

design)imposedby

centralgovernm

ent.

Level3,plustherequirementthat

studieshave

been

prepared

todeterminethepros/consof

simplifyingcertainelem

entsof

centralgovernm

enttax

administration(e.g.lessfrequent

taxinstalments,electronicfiling).

Therehasbeen

someinitial

implem

entationofreformsthat

addressthemainfindingsof

thesestudies.

Level4,plusevidence

thata)

reformshave

been

implem

ented

thataddressthemainfindingsof

studiesofpossiblesimplificationof

centralgovernm

enttax

administrationandb)meetings

have

been

heldwith

senior

provincial/state-leveltax

officialsto

discussSM

Ecompliancecosts

wherestudiesrevealthattax

compliancecostsinrelationtosub-

centralgovernm

entaxes(e.g.

propertytax)areexcessivelyhigh.

1

7.1.

7

Asse

ssm

ento

fpo

licy

mea

sure

sto

less

enta

xco

mpl

ianc

eco

sts

forS

MEs

TheMinistryofFinance

hasnotassessedthe

implications

ofalternativesimplified

taxpolicyregimes

(e.g.

presum

ptiveregimes)

toapplytoSM

Esto

addresstaxcompliance

costsunderapplication

ofbasicincometaxand

basicVATsystem

s.No

plansforassessm

ent.

TheMinistryofFinance

hasnotassessedthe

implications

ofalternative

simplified

taxpolicy

regimes

toapplytoSM

Estoaddresstaxcompliance

costsunderapplicationof

basicincometaxand

basicVATsystem

s,but

plansan

assessment

withinoneyear.

TheMinistryofFinance

hasassessed

the

implications

ofalternativetaxpolicy

regimes

(e.g.

presum

ptiveregimes

and/orVATexclusions

forfirm

sunderturnover

threshold)toapplyto

SMEs

toaddresstax

compliancecostsof

basicincometaxand

basicVATsystem

s.

Level3

plus

therequirementthat

analyses

have

been

prepared

that

considercriteria

andoptions

for

establishing

thresholdlevel(s)

determiningtheapplicationof

alternativeregimes

(e.g.VAT

exem

ption,versus

presum

ptive

taxregime,versus

basicVAT

regime),and

possibledistortions

(e.g.tofirmsize)introducedby

differentthresholdlevels.

Level4

plus

therequirementthat

therehasbeen

someinitial

implem

entationofreformsthat

applydifferenttaxregimes

toSM

Es,depending

ontheirsize(e.g.

turnover),whereanalyses

indicate

thatsuch

reformswouldbe

desirableandappropriate.

1

7.1.

8

Asse

ssm

ento

fSM

Eta

xpay

ers

assi

stan

ceto

redu

ceta

xco

mpl

ianc

ebu

rden

Limitedtaxpayer

access

(at

regional/localtax

offices)toinformation,

supporting

documentationand

assistance

towards

understandingand

complying

with

the

maintaxesimposedon

business

bycentral

government.No

immediateplansby

centralgovernm

entto

significantlyimprove

taxpayerservice.

Informationand

documentationtoassist

taxpayersincomplying

with

themaintaxes

imposedon

business

bythecentralgovernm

entis

dissem

inated

toregistered

taxpayersalongwith

tax

returns.

Plansarebeing

developedby

central

governmenttoimproveits

taxpayerservice.

Level2

plus

the

requirementthattax

returnsandinformation

andsupporting

documentationare

widelyavailableto

taxpayers(e.g.available

atnon-government

sites,downloadedfrom

governmentw

ebsites).

Atoll-freetelephone

service,with

adequatelytrained

tax

specialists,isprovided

torespondtotaxpayer

questions.

Level3

plus

therequirementthat

additionalservicestoeducate

business

onits

taxobligations,

reporting

andfilingrequirements

areprovided

throughan

‘outreach

programme’thatincludes

tax

seminarsorganisedatthelocal

level(e.g.with

localchambersof

commerce),specialadvertising,

andpossiblyotherstrategies

toactivelydissem

inatetax

informationtobusiness.

Level4

plus

regulardiscussions

with

nationalChambersof

Commerce

andotherbodiesto

considerhowtaxpayerassistance

andeducationcouldbe

improved.

1

271

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

7.2

Acce

ssto

Fina

nce

7.2.

1Cr

edit

guar

ante

esc

hem

esNo

creditguarantee

schemeinplace.

Creditguarantee

schemefacilityunder

consideration.

Creditguarantee

facilitiesinplace.

(Governm

entinitiative

andstatecontrolled).

Creditguaranteefacility

operatingundercontracttothe

privatesectorbutstate-funded.

Numberofm

utualorm

ixed

creditguaranteeschemes

inplaceunderprivate

managersabletofinance

them

selves

outoffeesalone.

1

7.2.

2Co

llate

rala

ndpr

ovis

ioni

ngre

quire

men

ts

Veryhigh

collateral

requirements>200%

.Restrictivecollateral

definition

and/orrigid

provisioning

requirementsfor

uncollateralised

loans

Collateralrequirement

ranging150-200%

ofloan

amount.Restrictive

collateraldefinition

and/orrigid

provisioning

requirementsfor

uncollateralised

loans

Flexiblecollateral

definition

and/orflexible

provisioning

requirementsforloans

under$30,000.

Flexiblecollateraldefinition

and/orflexibleprovisioning

requirementsforloans

under

$30,000andcentralcollateral

registryinplace

Flexiblecollateraldefinition

and/orflexibleprovisioning

requirementsforloans

under

$30,000andcentral

collateralregistrycovering

mostbankloans.

3

7.2.

3

Law

san

dpr

oced

ures

ondi

stre

ssed

com

pani

es,

rece

iver

ship

and

bank

rupt

cy

Nospecificlawsand/or

otherprocedureson

distressed

companies,

receivershipand

bankruptcy.

Distressed

company,

receivershipand

bankruptcy

lawsand/or

procedures

indrafting

stage.

Distressed

company,

receivershipand

bankruptcy

lawsand/or

procedures

formallyin-

place.

Legislationnot

system

aticandatan

early

stageof

implem

entation.

Evidence

ofimplem

entationof

distressed

company,

receivershipandbankruptcy

lawsand/orprocedures

inline

with

internationalstandards

and

fully

integrated

inand

consistentwith

commerciallaw

andpractice.Backlogofold

caseshasbeen

reduced.

Distressed

company,

receivershipandbankruptcy

lawsand/orprocedures

effectivelyandsystem

atically

appliedinatransparentway.

Procedures

take

place

speedily.

3

7.2.

4Ca

dast

reNo

functioning

cadastres.

Planshave

been

made

toimplem

enta

functioning

cadastre.

Cadastresystem

inplace,buttheland

ownershipofthe

countryhasnotyet

been

entirely

documented.

Theow

nershipofland

hasbeen

documentedbutthe

cadastreis

notfullyfunctioning.

Level4

+fully

functioning

cadastreallowingfirmsto

userealestateas

collateral

intheirefforts

toaccess

bank

finance.Availableon-line.

3

7.2.

5Le

asin

gin

dust

ryNo

leasingindustry,no

planstohave

leasing

law.

Leasinglawunder

preparation

Leasinglawapproved

andinstitutional

responsibilitiesclearly

assigned.

Evidence

ofimplem

entationof

leasinglaw.Regulatoractivein

monitoringthemarket.

Leasinglawfully

implem

ented.Regulationand

supervisionoftheleasing

sectorisenacted.

1

272

Annex 2Le

vel1

Leve

l2Le

vel3

Leve

l4Le

vel5

Wei

ghtf

orsu

b-di

men

sion

orin

dica

tor

(1-3

)

7.2.

6Ve

ntur

eca

pita

l/Equ

ityfu

nds

Noventurecapitalor

equityfundslegislation

underconsideration.

Equityfund

legislation

underconsideration.

Equityfund

legislation

inplace.

Level3

+.Severalequityfunds

investing,butonlyexit

possibilitiesaredirectsales.

Rangeofexitoptions

for

equityfunds,includinga

functioning

stockmarket.

1

7.2.

7Re

gist

ratio

nsy

stem

sfo

rm

ovea

ble

asse

ts

Nofunctioning

registrationsystem

sfor

movableassets.

Legislationtoestablish

afunctioning

registrationsystem

atthedraftingstage.

Registrationsystem

ofmovableassetsin

place,butnotyetfully

operational.

Informationnoteasily

accessibleorfully

reliable.

Theow

nershipofpledgeson

theregistered

assetshasbeen

fully

documented.Easy,low

-costaccess

toregistrationand

information.

Registration

system

in-line

with

international

standards.

4+fully

functioning

system

forregistrationofmovable

assets,allowingfirmstouse

movableassetsas

collateral

intheirefforts

toaccess

bank

finance.Informationavailable

on-line.

3

7.2.

8Cr

edit

info

rmat

ion

serv

ices

Nocreditinformation

services

availableinthe

country.

Creditinformation

services

in-place,but

access

limitedto

financialinstitutions.

Creditinformation

services

availableto

financialinstitutions

andtothepublic.Both

positiveandnegative

creditinformationis

available.

3+dataon

loansofmorethan

€20,000

tolegaland

physical

personsarecollected

andmade

availabletofinancialinstitutions

andthepublicupon

request.

Informationisupdatedregularly

andcomprehensive.

4+morethan

2yearsof

historicaldataaredistributed.

Bylaw,borrowershave

the

righttoaccess

theirdata.

3

273

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

8.1

Prom

ote

tech

nolo

gydi

ssem

inat

ion

tow

ards

SMEs

1

8.1.

1Su

ppor

ttra

inin

gon

tech

nolo

gyNo

supportfortraining

ontechnology.

Governmentisplanning

tointroduce

someform

ofsupport,butno

concreteactionhas

been

taken.

Formulationand

approvalofconcrete

programmes

totechnologicaltraining,

relyingon

publicand

privateservice

providersdesignationof

competentauthority

andbudgetprovisions.

Partialimplem

entationrecordof

supportprogram

me.Key

componentsfully

operational.

Fullimplem

entationof

technologicaltraining

programmes,i.e.

system

ofvouchersto

supporttrainingon

technology

fully

implem

entedand

availablethroughoutthe

country.

1

8.2

Fost

erte

chno

logy

co-o

pera

tion

deve

lop

rese

arch

prog

ram

mes

focu

sed

onco

mm

erci

alap

plic

atio

nof

know

ledg

ean

dte

chno

logy

1

8.2.

1

Inno

vatio

nan

dte

chno

logy

cent

res/

co-o

pera

tion

betw

een

univ

ersi

ties,

R&D

cent

res

and

SMEs

Noschemes

toprom

ote

co-operationon

innovation.

Evaluationand

proposalson

the

introductionof

innovationand

technology

centres.

Partnershipwith

private

sector.

Policyframew

orkin

place.Actionplan

and

budgetaryprovisions

approved,pilot

schemes

introduced.

Initialevidence

ofimplem

entationof

innovationprom

otionschemes.

Innovationandtechnology

centres

inoperations.Private/public

partnershipinR&

D,innovationand

productdevelopmentactively

supportedby

centraland

local

government.

Networkofhigh

level

innovationand

technology

centres

presentinthecountry.

Strong

relationshipwith

research

institutions

andprivatesector.

1

8.2.

2In

telle

ctua

lpro

pert

yrig

hts

(IPRs

)

Nolegislationon

intellectualproperty

inplace,system

atic

violations

ofIPRs.

Legislationon

IPRs

underpreparation.

IPRs

legislation

approved,assuring

protectionconsistent

with

TRIPsagreem

ent.

Effectiveenforcem

entofIPRsdoes

notextendtoalltypes

ofIP

(patents,trademarks,copyright,

industrialdesigns

etc)ortoalltypes

ofproducts(pharmaceuticals,

audio-video,spareparts,etc)and

itdoes

notinvolve

allthe

concerned

authorities

(customs,policy,courts,

etc)

Good

implem

entation

recordofIPRs

legislation.IPis

effectivelyand

system

atically

protectedinallits

formsandforall

products.

2

8.3

Deve

lop

inte

r-fir

mcl

uste

rsan

dne

twor

ks2

8.3.

1In

ter-

firm

clus

ters

and

netw

orks

Governmenthas

noclearstrategy

oninter-

firmclusters.

Proposalstodevelop

inter-firmclustersand

networks.Consultations

with

business

sector.

Pilotprojectinonekey

sector.

Approvalofactionplan

anddesignationof

competentauthority.

Inter-firmclustersandnetworks

concentratedintraditionalexport

sectors.

Widerangeofinter-firm

clustersandnetworks

coveringawiderange

ofsectors,including

internalmarket.

8.ST

REN

GT

HEN

ING

TH

ET

ECH

NO

LOG

ICA

LC

APA

CIT

Y

274

Annex 29

SU

CC

ESSFU

LE-

BU

SIN

ESS

MO

DEL

SA

ND

TO

PC

LASS

SM

ALL

BU

SIN

ESS

SU

PPO

RT

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

9.1

SME

supp

ortf

acili

ties

and

serv

ices

1

9.1.

1Bu

sine

ssin

cuba

tors

Noincubatorsinplace

andno

plansto

establishthem

Strategy

onincubators

underdiscussion/local

initiatives

inpreparation.

Strategy

onincubators

approved:detailed

proposalsandbudget

allocations,eitheratcentral

orlocalgovernm

entlevel.

Pilotincubatorsin

operation.Focuson

job

creation,no

exitstrategies.

Level3

+severalincubatorsin

operation,outofthe

experim

ental

phase.Provisionofbasicservices,

someincubatorsused

tofoster

innovation.Partialimplem

entation

ofOECD

guidelines

onbusiness

incubators

Level4

+networkof

incubatorsthroughoutthe

country.Focuson

innovation,

provisionofhigh

quality

services,existence

ofexit

strategies.OECDguidelines

widelyimplem

ented.

1

9.1.

2Ra

nge

ofbu

sine

ssse

rvic

es

Verylim

itedrangeof

basicbusiness

services,available

mainlythroughdonor

funded

programmes.

Morestructured

rangeof

business

service,

availablethrougha

combinationofpublic

funded

andprivate

business

providers

Networkofpublicfunded

business

serviceproviders.

Good

networkofprivate

business

serviceproviders,

providingpersonalised

services

forenterprises

Welldeveloped

marketforbusiness

services,w

ithgood

levelofinternal

competition.

Level4

+widerangeof

business

services

availablein

thecountry,including

widespreadpresence

ofinternationalconsultancyfirms

2

9.1.

3Qu

ality

ofbu

sine

ssse

rvic

es

Nostandards/

certificationon

quality

ofservices.

Non-bindingguidelines

onquality

ofbusiness

services

under

discussion.

Non-bindingguidelines

approved.Public-private

co-operationtosetquality

standardsandcertification

procedures

forprovision

ofbusiness

services.

Level3

+somecertifications

and

standardsinplaceforsom

ebusiness

services.Strong

private

elem

entinelaborationofstandards

andcertificationprocess.

Level4

+mostofbusiness

services

areregulatedby

quality

standardsbasedon

internationalstandards.

Certificationandmonitoring

mainlybasedon

privatesector.

2

9.2

Info

rmat

ion

forS

MEs

1

9.2.

1Av

aila

bilit

yan

dac

cess

ibili

tyof

info

rmat

ion

Noinformationon

availabilityof

business

services.

Fragmentedinformation

onavailabilityofbusiness

services

availablelocally.

Nationaldirectoryof

providersofbusiness

services

availablelocally.

Level3

+personalised

information

onprovidersofbusiness

services

availableon-dem

andinpaperform.

Nationaldirectoryofproviders

ofbusiness

services

available

on-line

with

multiple-criteria

search

engine.

1

9.2.

2Bu

sine

ssin

form

atio

nce

ntre

s

Nobusiness

informationcentres.

Informalinformationcan

beobtained

insomelocal

offices.

Creationofarepertoryof

business

information,

availablelocally

inclearly

designated

offices.

Personalised

business

information

availableon

demandinpaperform

frominformationcentres.

Repertoryofbusiness

informationavailableon-line

with

multiple-criteriasearch

engine

onsinglebusiness

informationweb

portal.

1

9.3

Law

onel

ectr

onic

sign

atur

e1

9.3.

1El

ectr

onic

sign

atur

e

Thegovernmentdoes

nothaveaconcrete

plan

onelectronic

signature.

Evaluationand

formulationofdetailed

proposalsoflawon

electronicsignatureand

implem

entingregulations.

Approvaloflawon

electronicsignatureandof

theimplem

enting

regulations.

Solid

evidence

ofimplem

entationof

lawon

electronicsignature.

Possibilitytousee-signatureinkey

areasforSMEs

incontactw

ithpublicadministration.

Fullimplem

entationoflawon

electronicsignatureandfull

integrationofelectronic

signaturewith

otherservices

ofe-government.Regular

review

sinconsultationwith

SMEs.

1

275

10.D

EVEL

OP

ST

RO

NG

ER,M

ORE

EFFE

CT

IVE

REP

RES

ENTA

TIO

NO

FSM

ALL

ENT

ERPR

ISES

’IN

TER

EST

S

Leve

l1Le

vel2

Leve

l3Le

vel4

Leve

l5W

eigh

tfor

sub-

dim

ensi

onor

indi

cato

r(1

-3)

10.1

SME

netw

ork

3

10.1

.1SM

Ene

twor

kInformalgroupin

gofSM

Esat

local/secto

rlevel,

withlim

ited

mem

bership

base.

Industry/se

ctorg

roupso

fSM

Esrepresentingbusin

ess,

withalimitedmem

bership

base.N

onation

alnetwork,

limitedcapacityo

frepresentation

Structu

redloc

alandnation-wide

interestrepresentation

,presenceo

factiveN

GOs,craftsassocia

tions,

presence

ofinternalgovernance

rules

.

Organis

edSM

Eassocia

tions,N

GOs,

craftsassocia

tions,operatingat

nationalle

vel(directly

orthrougha

networks

ystem),grow

ingcapacityto

engage

governmentinpolicyd

ialogue

onkeyissues

Strong,in

dependentand

locallyrooted

networko

fSMEs,representing

SMEs

interestatlocalandnationalle

vel.

Capacitytoc

onductconstru

ctive

and

regular

policyc

onsultations

onaw

iderangeo

fissues.

2

10.1

.2Ch

ambe

rsof

Com

mer

ce(C

oC)

CoChasn

oinstitution

aladvocacy

role,

general

information

service

sprovid

ed,

fewbasic

busin

esss

ervic

esofferedtomem

bers

Somea

dvocacyrole

,limitedloc

alnetwork,capable

ofofferingsome

service

sand

operating

underclea

rlydefined

governance

rules

.

Strong

advocacy

roleextended

alsoto

SMErelated

issues,strongloc

alpresence,capableofofferingaw

iderangeo

fservic

es.

1

10.2

Publ

icPr

ivat

eCo

nsul

tatio

ns(P

PCs)

3

10.2

.1

Freq

uenc

yof

publ

ic/p

riva

teco

nsul

tatio

n(P

PCs)

Consultation

onSM

Eiss

ues

betweenthep

ublic

andpriva

tesphereso

ccur

sporadica

lly/ad-

hoc.

Proposals

have

been

madeto

establish

astructure/fram

eworkfor

public/priva

teconsultation

.

Aregulation

(s)has/h

aveb

een

adoptedwh

ichstipulate(s

)regula

rconsultation

betweenpublica

ndpriva

tesphereso

nSM

Eiss

ues.

Consultation

sinvolv

ingkeya

ctors

frompublica

ndpriva

tesecto

rtake

place

onaq

uarte

rlybasis

.

Level4

+thec

onsultations

take

place

onam

onthlybasis

ormore.

2

10.2

.2Fo

rmal

influ

ence

ofPP

Cs

PPCs

take

theformof

unstructureddebatesb

etwe

enthep

ublic

andpriva

tesecto

ron

generalSMEiss

ues.

Level1

+thep

rivates

ector

hasthe

opportu

nitytog

iveform

alrecommendations

ontheissuesd

iscussed.

Level2

+thep

rivate

secto

rhas

the

opportunitytoformallyc

ommenton

draft

SMElegislation

inthose

meetings.

Level3

+thereisa

mple

evide

ncethat

thec

ommentson

draftlegislation

are

integrated+thep

rivates

ectorcan

suggestown

initiatived

raftlaw

sor

measureso

nSM

Epolicy.

Level4

+thereisa

mple

evide

ncethat

suggestions

onow

ninitiatived

raft

lawso

rmeasuresfromthep

rivate

secto

rhaveb

eenrealised.

2

10.2

.3Re

pres

enta

tivity

ofPP

Cs

Few,

random

lyselec

ted

companie

sareinv

itedtothe

PPCs.The

access

totheP

PCsis

thus

restricted

andthereisn

osyste

mofdis

semina

tingthe

information

aboutupcom

ingPPCs

tothep

rivates

ector.

Invitations

ofcompanie

stothe

PPCs

aretargeted,howe

verm

ainlytobig

andinflue

ntial

companie

s.Some

attemptsa

remadetoinformthe

priva

tesecto

raboutupcoming

PPCs

(e.g.announcementson

governmentw

ebsite).

TheP

PCsc

onsis

tofa

forumthatis

broadly

representativeo

fthe

SME

community

(differentsectors,different

company

sizes,chambersof

commerce,etc.).Comprehensiv

eand

widelyaccessibles

tructu

resa

rein

place

toinformthep

rivates

ector

aboutupcom

ingPPCs.

2

10.2

.4Ho

wdo

esth

ePP

Cm

eet?

Thetiming

oftheP

PCsis

decid

edupon

bytheg

overnm

ent

withshortnotice

.Thereisno

pattern

inthetiming

ofthe

meetings

throughoutthey

ear.

Meetings

ares

hortandthe

governmentdecide

sonthe

agenda

entirely

.Noformal

record

ofthem

eetings

iskept.

PPCs

occuronaregula

rbasis,

the

scheduleisagreed

upon

withthe

priva

tesecto

ratthe

begin

ningof

they

ear.T

heagenda

oftheP

PCsis

senttothep

articipa

ntsinadvance

andthey

areg

iventheo

pportunity

togiv

ecom

mentsandsuggest

changes.Aform

alrecord

ofthe

meetings

iskept,butisnoteasily

accessible.

Level3

+Thep

rivates

ectoris

responsib

leford

esign

ingpartofthe

agenda

independentlyandcancallfor

anexception

almeetingseveraltimes

peryearw

hendeem

ednecessary.A

detailedrecord

ofthem

eetings

iskept

anditiswidelyaccessible(e.g

.published

onaw

ebsite)

1

276

Annex 3

The Western Balkans National CharterCo-ordinators

COUNTRY NAME CONTACT DETAILS TEL/FAX/E-MAIL

ALBANIAMr. Gavril LASKU

Director of “Export Promotion and SMEDevelopment” division

ALBINVESTBlvd “Gjergj Fishta”Pall Shallvare Tirana

Albania

Tel: +355/4/235704Mob: +355/696/062 099

[email protected]

BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINAMr. Ivica MIODRAG

Chief of Department for EconomicDevelopment and Entrepreneurship

Ministry of Foreign Trade and EconomicRelationsMusala 9

71000 SarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina

Tel: +387/33/444.303Fax: +387/33/206/141

[email protected]

CROATIAMrs. Dragica KARAIC

Head of International Department forSMEs

Ministry for Economy, Labour andEntrepreneurship

Ulica grada Vukovara 7810000 Zagreb

Croatia

Tel: +385/1/610.68.12Fax: +385/1/610/91/14

[email protected]

KOSOVO under UNSCR 1244/99Mr. Naser GRAJCEVCI

Director

SME Support Agency3-5 “Perandori Justinian”

Qyteza Pejton10000 Prishtina

Kosovo under UNSCR 1244/99

Tel: +381/38/ 20036007Mob: +377/44 /141563Fax: +381/38/504604

[email protected]@yahoo.com

FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLICOF MACEDONIA

Mr Imerali BAFTIJARIHead of Support of Entrepreneurship andCompetitiveness of SME Department

Ministry of EconomyJuri Gagarin 151000 Skopje

FYR Macedonia

Tel: +389/2/[email protected]

MONTENEGROMr. Zarko DJURANOVIC

ManagerEICC Montenegro

Directorate for the Development of Smalland Medium Sized Enterprises

Bulevar Revolucije 281,000 Podgorica

Montenegro

Tel: +382/81/406 310Fax: +382/ 81/406 323

[email protected]

SERBIAMr Igor BRKANOVIC

Assistant Minister of Economy

Ministry of Economy and RegionalDevelopment

15 Kralja Aleksandra St.BelgradeSerbia

Tel: +382/11/3347 207Fax: +382/11/3216 794

[email protected]