LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN OF Ti 6Al 4V FORGINGS€¦ · The objective of this study was to determine the...
Transcript of LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN OF Ti 6Al 4V FORGINGS€¦ · The objective of this study was to determine the...
1
LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN OF Ti‐6Al‐4V FORGINGS Authors: Bernd Oberwinkler (Inst. of Mech. Eng. – University of Leoben)
Martin Riedler (Böhler Schmiedetechnik GmbH & Co KG) Wilfried Eichlseder (Inst. of Mech. Eng. – University of Leoben)
ABSTRACT
Forged parts made of titanium are generally used in aerospace industry, e.g. for engine mounts, pylon fitting and frame parts. To achieve damage tolerant together with lightweight design of such components the local microstructure resulting from thermo‐mechanical treatment has to be considered. Further influences (e.g. multiaxial loading, notches and impressed mean stress) play also a major role with respect to the fatigue behavior. Therefore a new approach is introduced in this paper containing methodologies for the determination of local S/N‐curves for Ti‐6Al‐4V. They can be embedded in a lifetime prediction based on local stresses.
INTRODUCTION
In the aerospace industry, the realization of lightweight structural components is a top priority. Reducing the weight of structural components increases the potential payload of the aircraft and decreases the fuel consumption. Lightweight design is thereby based on three principal points:
• Material
• Processing
• Design Material Titanium alloys have become very important materials in the aircraft industry, due to their excellent properties (such as high fatigue strength and good corrosion resistance) and low density; ideal for lightweight design. Titanium components (particularly Ti‐6Al‐4V) are used in place of heavy steel components (e.g. airfoils, pylon fitting, undercarriage components, and other structural parts).
Processing Manufacturing parts according to customer specifications by using forming techniques has both cost and quality advantages, compared to cutting and machining parts out of feedstock plates or bars. Because of this, components are increasingly manufactured by forging. Forging results in better utilization of material through near net shape manufacturing, and also reduces manufacturing costs and provides better mechanical properties, such as high fatigue strengths. Therefore forging is suitable for the processing of lightweight titanium components. Design Depending on the thermomechanical treatment of a titanium alloy, in this case Ti‐6Al‐4V, the microstructure and thus also the mechanical properties can vary in a wide range. Such influences have been documented in numerous reports in the literature, see, for example, Refs [1‐12], with the problem that a holistic optimization of the whole product development chain (design, thermomechanical processing) is still lacking. Therefore it is currently not possible to optimize Ti‐6Al‐4V components with respect to thermomechanical processing and design.
The objective of this study was to determine the fatigue behavior of Ti‐6Al‐4V in the finite and in the high cycle fatigue region as well as the fatigue crack growth properties in respect of microstructure, mean stress, notches and multiaxial loading. These results were then embedded in a new approach for determination of local S/N‐curves to provide a basis for the lifetime prediction and optimization of forged Ti‐6Al‐4V lightweight structural components. The verification will be done on a purpose designed engine mount.
2
APPROACH
With the aid of forming simulation using finite element analysis it will be possible to predict the local microstructure in Ti‐6Al‐4V forgings in respect of the thermomechanical processing. A link between this local microstructure and the fatigue life is necessary to enable an accurate lifetime prediction for forged Ti‐6Al‐4V components and to optimize their processing. Therefore a new approach (Fig. 1) has been developed where local microstructure results in local microstructural‐based S/N‐curves and stress intensity factor thresholds. The local microstructural‐based S/N‐curves can be combined with additional important influences regarding fatigue, e.g. mean stress, notches and multiaxial loading, to local S/N‐curves. They provide the basis for computation of the local lifetime of forged components. In combination with the local (microstructural‐based) stress intensity factor threshold it is furthermore possible to predict the local damage tolerance (cf. e.g. [13]) by application of the Kitagawa‐Takahashi relationship [14] between flaw size and fatigue strength. In addition this new approach provides a direct link of forging simulation and local lifetime or damage tolerance. With these closed optimization loops (forging simulation local lifetime / damage tolerance) the thermomechanical processing can be optimized for forgings where the fatigue lifetime or the damage tolerance is the main criterion.
Fig. 1 – Approach for damage tolerant lightweight
design of Ti‐6Al‐4V forgings
MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION
Fig. 2 – Micrographs of analyzed materials
The material used for this research work was provided by Böhler Schmiedetechnik GmbH & Co KG (Kapfenberg, Austria) in the form of Ti‐6Al‐4V open‐die V‐shape and closed‐die side‐pressed pancake forgings, respectively. Additionally the feedstock billet (FB, diameter 230 mm) for the V‐shape forgings was investigated in as‐received condition (AR). Different heat treatments (HT) were performed on the forgings: mill‐annealing (MA), solution treating with air cooling (ST), solution treating with polymer quenching (STPQ), recryst.‐annealing (RA) and beta‐annealing (BA). These different heat treatments led to a high diversity of equiaxed and bimodal microstructures, respectively (Fig. 2). Due to the chosen forging temperature of 930°C no crystallographic texture occurs. Mill‐annealing does not cause complete recrystallization, and therefore leads to a distinct texture of the primary α‐grain shapes, representative of the forging process. A detailed characterization of the different forgings can be found in [15]. The microstructures were characterized with respect to several microstructural parameters (Tab. 1). These are the average primary α‐grain size αp, the (α+β)‐content Cα+β, the connectivity Con of the primary α‐grains, the colony size Col of the lamellae‐packets and the mean α‐lamellae width Lam.
3
HT αp
[µm] Cα+β [%]
Con [%]
Col [µm]
Lam [µm]
MAV 11.5 20.3 28.7 9.2 0.65
STPQV 8.1 61.4 39.5 13.4 0.58
STV 9.0 67.0 78.9 32.4 1.21
MAP 8.2 30.9 45.2 7.1 0.57
STP 8.9 50.9 33.7 16.1 0.74
RAP 10.3 0 99.0 ‐ ‐
ARFB 9.8 0 0 ‐ ‐
Tab. 1 – Microstructural characterization
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
The test program consisted of rotating bending, tension/compression, torsional and multiaxial fatigue tests and long crack propagation tests. In addition the crack initiation and short crack growth was studied for two microstructures. All tests were performed at ambient air and at room temperature. Specimens from V‐shapes were sampled in transverse direction. This led – in consideration of a constant effective strain in longitudinal direction – to specimens with identical effective strain in the highest loaded cross section. The specimens from pancakes and feedstock bars were taken in longitudinal direction. The sampling was done by water jet cutting or sawing with a band saw, followed by milling and fine turning, respectively. The roughness was measured with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LEXT). The fine turning of the round fatigue specimens led to an average roughness height of 0.6 μm. Influence of microstructure Rotating bending (RB) fatigue tests (stress ratio R = ‐1) were performed on round hourglass specimens with a frequency of 63 Hz. All S/N‐curves (cf. Fig. 3) correspond with a survival probability of 50 %. The results show that the fatigue strength varies in a wide spectrum in respect of the microstructure. The fatigue limit of the equiaxed materials is much lower than those of the bimodal and mill‐annealed microstructures.
Fig. 3 – Fatigue behavior in respect of microstructure
The fatigue strength in the finite life region shows also strong interdependencies with the microstructure, whereas the slope of the S/N‐curves in the finite life region is almost unaffected. The characterization of the long crack growth behavior (Fig. 4) was done with V‐notched single edge bending (SEB) specimens under four point bending loading at a resonant testing rig with a frequency of approximately 140 Hz. Thereby the crack length was measured with the potential drop method. The measurements were performed for four different stress ratios R (ratio of minimum and maximum stress or stress intensity factor respectively). The stress intensity factor range ΔK was derived according to linear elastic fracture mechanics for all stress ratios, cf. [15].
Fig. 4 – Fatigue crack growth behavior in respect of microstructure
4
Fig. 5 – Linking stress intensity factor threshold and
fracture surface roughness Distinct differences were found in the near‐threshold region in respect of the stress ratio owing to crack closure effects. This was confirmed by roughness measurements of the fracture surface. A linear relationship between average roughness height Ra and stress intensity factor threshold ΔKth was found (Fig. 5). Especially the forged materials with the equiaxed and bimodal microstructures exhibit a good accordance with the linear fit. This is caused by a linear correlation of primary α‐grain size and fracture surface roughness. The ranking of the different microstructures regarding fatigue crack propagation is not affected by the stress ratio. Influence of impressed mean stress Tension/compression (TC) tests were performed on round hourglass specimens with different stress ratios R. The results show that impressed mean stress significantly reduces the fatigue strength of Ti‐6Al‐4V (Fig. 6). Furthermore it was observed that the transition point shifts beyond 107 load cycles for stress ratios greater‐than‐or‐equal 0. This is important because literature data ([2], [11], [16], [17]) was only found for 107 load cycles resulting in a non‐conservative fatigue limit for stress ratios greater‐than‐or‐equal 0. The slope of the S/N‐curves in the finite life region is not affected by the stress ratio.
Fig. 6 – Fatigue behavior in respect of mean stress
Influence of multiaxial loading Alternating torsion and multiaxial (combined rotating bending and alternating torsion with τ/σ = 0.5) fatigue tests were performed on round hourglass specimens in ambient air (room temperature) with a frequency of 30 Hz. In addition tension/compression tests were done on mild notched round specimens (same relative stress gradient as unnotched specimens under torsional or multiaxial loading). It was observed that the fatigue limit for tension/compression load σf is 560 MPa. The endurance limit under alternating torsion load τf is approximately 315 MPa. This leads to a ratio τf/σf of 0.56; typical for ductile materials. Therefore the Mises equivalent stress (for plane stress state cf. Equ. 1) was used for comparison of the S/N‐curves for tension/compression, torsional and multiaxial loading, respectively.
2 2 23ES x y x y xyσ = σ + σ − σ σ + τ (1)
The experimental results (Fig. 7) show that the Mises equivalent stress leads to a good accordance of fatigue limits in respect of type of loading. In the finite life region differences can be found; caused by an overestimation of shear stresses with respect to crack propagation. Therefore the Mises equivalent stress is valid for high cycle fatigue region and conservative for finite life.
5
Fig. 7 – Fatigue behavior in respect of type of loading Influence of notches Notches cause stress concentration in combination with high relative stress gradients. The relative stress gradient, χ* [1/mm], is defined as the slope of the stress distribution at the point of maximum stress and is related to the maximum stress (Equ. 2).
max
1* ddxσ
χ = ⋅σ
(2)
In a lifetime estimation based on local stresses the so‐called supporting effect of notches is included by consideration of the local relative stress gradient (e.g. [18]). Fatigue tests were hence done on unnotched and notched round specimens (mill‐annealed microstructure) under tension/compression or rotating bending loading (ambient air, room temperature). The experimental results are shown in Fig. 8. The plotted stress amplitudes are Mises equivalent stresses due to the multiaxial stress state in the notch roots. All S/N‐curves correspond to a survival probability of 50%. The experimental results show that the mill‐annealed microstructure exhibits for χ*<0.4 and χ*>0.5 no supporting effect in the high cycle fatigue region. Only stress gradients between 0.4 and 0.5 led to higher fatigue limits. Due to additional fatigue tests on STPQ Ti‐6Al‐4V it can be suggested that this (currently unclear) behavior is limited on MA microstructures.
Fig. 8 – Fatigue behavior in respect of notches
FATIGUE MODELS
The experimental results show that the fatigue behavior of Ti‐6Al‐4V is influenced by microstructure, mean stress and notches. Models were hence developed for consideration of these influences in a lifetime prediction based on local stresses. Linking microstructure and fatigue The microstructure was related to fatigue using several microstructural parameters. The fatigue limit was thereby linked with mean primary α‐grain size (via Hall‐Petch relationship) or (α+β)‐colony size (via linear relation), depending on the (α+β)‐content, cf. Fig. 9. The fatigue limit of microstructures with low (α+β)‐content depends on the primary α‐grain size, those of microstructures with higher (α+β)‐content depends on the (α+β)‐colony size.
Fig. 9 – Linking microstructure and fatigue limit
6
Equ. 3 (for Cα+β< 20%) and Equ. 4 (for Cα+β> 30%, cf. Fig. 10) represent the mathematic description for both regions marked in Fig. 9. Thereby αp is the mean primary α‐grain size [m] and Col the (α+β)‐colony size [µm].
,10.36 350f M
p
σ = +α
(3)
, 685 6.8f M Colσ = − (4)
Fig. 10 – Linking microstructure and fatigue limit
Analyses of the crack initiation phase in mill‐annealed and solution treated Ti‐6Al‐4V were done under rotating bending loading (R=‐1) with constant stress amplitude (750 MPa). Approximately 25% of the total lifetime were thereby defined as crack initiation phase.
Fig. 11 – Initial crack length distribution
These measurements confirmed that fatigue cracks initiate even in primary α‐grains or in (α+β)‐colonies. The size of these microstructural features is hence affecting the fatigue limit. In spite of the low (α+β)‐content (approximately 20%) of the mill‐annealed microstructure, 58% of the fatigue cracks initiate in the lamellar (α+β)‐phase. In the solution treated microstructure with the higher (α+β)‐content of 51% almost 80% of the cracks nucleate in (α+β)‐phase. Therefore it can be concluded that the cracks initiate easier in (α+β)‐phase owing to an alloy element partitioning effect, cf. [4]. The initial crack length distributions for both microstructures can be found in Fig. 11. Weibull‐fits were used for approximation. A comparison of the initial crack length distributions shows that the initial cracks are smaller in the mill‐annealed microstructure. The measurement of the microstructurally short crack growth exhibited that the cracks propagate faster in α‐phase than in (α+β)‐regions. This seems to be the reason for the lower fatigue strength of microstructures with low (α+β)‐content. The microstructure also plays a major role regarding long crack growth (cf. Fig. 4). For a quantitative link between microstructure and crack growth the experimental stress intensity factor thresholds were plotted in respect of the stress ratio R, [15]. A linear relationship was chosen to fit the data points. Thereby a fixed point was found at a stress ratio of 0.87 and a stress intensity factor threshold of 1.75 MPa√m. The slope kth of the fitting lines was linked via combination of Hall‐Petch‐approach and Boltzmann sigmoid with the microstructural parameters connectivity Con [%] and primary α‐grain size αp [m], cf. Equ. 5 and Fig. 12.
5
1 3.20.0156 9.38
1th Con
p
k
e⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
= − −α
+
(5)
This microstructural‐based slope leads in combination with the fixed point mentioned before to a model for the estimation of the stress intensity factor threshold in respect of microstructure and stress ratio.
7
Additional information and the link of fatigue strength in the finite life region with microstructural parameters can be found in [15].
Fig. 12 – Linking microstructure and crack growth
Linking relative stress gradient and fatigue The supporting effect of a relative stress gradient is often considered in lifetime prediction based on local stresses with an exponential relation [19]. Previous work [10] and the fatigue tests on unnotched and notched specimens show that Ti‐6Al‐4V exhibits no supporting effect in the high cycle fatigue region, and in the finite life region for χ*<2 too (Fig. 13). Therefore it can be suggested that the fatigue limit in respect of the stress gradient σf,MG is equal to the fatigue limit of the microstructural‐based model σf,M, Equ. 6.
, ,f MG f Mσ = σ (6)
Fig. 13 – Linking relative stress gradient and fatigue
The mill‐annealed microstructure shows some anomalies at low stress gradients (approximately 0.5 mm‐1). Higher fatigue strengths were observed; both, under tension/compression and under rotating bending loading. It can be suggested that the “normal” fatigue limit owing to the microstructure is increased if the relative stress gradient χ* is between 0.4 and 0.5 mm‐1. For finite life, the tension/compression test result at χ*=0.5 is concordant with the test results at higher and lower stress gradients and also with the microstructural‐based fatigue strength (cf. [15]). But the rotating bending test result for χ*=0.4 exhibits anomalous fatigue behavior in finite life region too. It is assumed that these anomalies are limited on mill‐annealed microstructures only. Further research will be done on Pancake mill‐annealed and V‐shape STPQ for clarification of these anomalies. Linking mean stress and fatigue Several models exist to describe the influence of mean stress on the fatigue strength in the region between R=‐1 and R=1, e.g. Goodman relation or Gerber parable [20]. But the experimental results show that these models are non‐conservative for Ti‐6Al‐4V with respect to the fatigue limit. Therefore a new model was developed where the stress ratio R is linked with the stress amplitude at 108 load cycles via exponential relation (Equ. 7), cf. Fig. 14.
0.834(1 ), ,
Rf MGM f MG e− +σ = σ ⋅ (7)
Fig. 14 – Linking stress ratio and fatigue limit
8
This model was used for the Haigh diagram in Fig. 15; supplemented by the run‐out level at a stress ratio R=‐∞ and the 0.2% yield strength at R=1.
Fig. 15 – Haigh diagram for mill‐annealed Ti‐6Al‐4V
Importance of maximum stress Both, the experimental results with impressed mean stress and those with different stress gradients lead to the assumption that the maximum stress determines the fatigue limit of Ti‐6Al‐4V. It can be concluded that the crack initiates if a certain equivalent stress level is reached (Fig. 16); independent of stress gradient or stress ratio.
Fig. 16 – Importance of maximum stress
Considering further influences Further important influences on the fatigue behavior of Ti‐6Al‐V are the surface state and operation temperature. The influence of surface state (with respect to surface roughness and residual stresses) on the fatigue behavior is reported in [21]. Additional research work will be done to include these results in a computational lifetime prediction.
One possible approach is to include residual stresses in the finite element simulation. These residual stresses acting in a lifetime estimation as mean stresses. The roughness can be included as a separate reduction factor. Ti‐6Al‐4V is used up to 350°C but the influence of elevated temperature on the fatigue behavior has very rarely been reported. Tokaji [22] showed that the high cycle fatigue behavior is significantly influenced by temperature. His experimental results are shown in Fig. 17; supplemented by yield strengths of mill‐annealed Ti‐6Al‐4V at different temperatures reported by Boyer et al. [1]. It can be seen that the tensile strength and the fatigue limit exhibit, up to approximately 630 K (the maximum operation temperature of Ti‐6Al‐4V components), the same decrease with increasing temperature. Therefore a model is suggested using a linear relation between temperature T [K] and fatigue strength (Equ. 8).
, ,0.9(293 )f f MGM RTTσ = − + σ (8)
Further research work is necessary to verify this model for the present materials.
Fig. 17 – Linking strength and temperature
VERIFICATION
The verification of the presented models has been done on a purpose designed engine mount. First results regarding computational lifetime estimation are presented; component tests will follow.
9
A first approach was used to link thermomechanical processing and microstructure. Therefore it was possible to get the microstructure‐distribution in the component via forging simulation. This distribution was mapped from the forging simulation mesh to a finite element (FE) mesh for stress calculation. The local stress tensor and the local S/N‐curve (based on the fatigue models presented above) were hence calculated in every node of the FE mesh. A damage accumulation (according to Miner, cf. [20]) was done to get the damage distribution in the component. The combination of fatigue limit and stress intensity factor threshold (e.g. according to Kitagawa and Takahashi [14]) results in a distribution of the allowable crack size for no‐growth (Fig. 18).
Fig. 18 – Colony size (l) and allowable crack size (r)
CONCLUSION
Fatigue tests were done on Ti‐6Al‐4V specimens. The experimental results were analyzed and used for generation of several fatigue models, cf. (Fig. 19). With the knowledge of the geometry and load of a component a finite element (FE) analysis can be done to get the stress distribution. An additional forging simulation leads to the microstructure‐distribution in the forging. A combination of stresses, microstructural parameters and fatigue models affords a lifetime prediction based on local stresses. This information can then be used for optimization of the thermomechanical processing and/or the geometry for maximum durability and minimum weight. Finally, the forging simulation delivers the optimized process parameters for the forging of an optimized lightweight component.
Fig. 19 – Lightweight design of Ti‐6Al‐4V forgings
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank the Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Economics and Labor, the federal governments of Styria, Tyrol, Vienna, Upper Austria and Lower Austria and the Austrian Research Promotion Agency for the funding of this work, in the framework of the Austrian Aeronautics Research Program and FFG’s BRIDGE program. The support by Böhler Schmiedetechnik GmbH & Co KG Kapfenberg is much valued.
REFERENCES
[1] Boyer R., Welsch G., Collings E.W. Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys. ASM International, 1994, ISBN 0‐871‐70481‐1, 483‐547.
[2] Adachi S., Wagner L., Lütjering G. Influence of microstructure and mean stress on fatigue strength of Ti‐6Al‐4V. In: Lütjering G, Zwicker U, Bunk W, editors. Titanium '84 – Science and Technology, Vol. 4. Munich, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Metallkunde EV 1985:2051‐58.
[3] Nalla R.K., Boyce B.L., Campbell J.P., Peters J.O., Ritchie R.O. Influence of Microstructure on High‐Cylce Fatigue of Ti‐6Al‐4V: Bimodal vs. Lamellar Structures. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A; 2002, 33A: 899‐918.
[4] Lütjering G., Williams J.C. Titanium. 2nd Edition, Springer‐Verlag, 2007, ISBN 978‐3‐540‐71397‐5
[5] Peters M., Gysler A., Lütjering G. Influence of microstructure on the fatigue behavior of Ti‐6Al‐4V. Titanium '80, Science and Technology, Vol. 3, pp. 1777‐1786, Japan, 1980.
[6] Oberwinkler B., Javidi A., Leitner H. Schwingfestigkeit von Ti‐6Al‐4V – Betrachtung mehrerer Einflussgrößen. Pohl M, editor. Tagung Werkstoffprüfung 2007. Düsseldorf: Verlag Stahleisen GmbH, pp. 145‐150, ISBN 978‐3‐514‐00753‐6.
10
[7] Bache M.R., Evans W.J., Suddell B., Herrouin F.R.M. The effects of texture in titanium alloys for engineering components under fatigue. International Journal of Fatigue, 2001; 23: S153‐S159.
[8] Zuo J.H., Wang Z.G., Han E.H. Effect of microstructure on ultra‐high cycle fatigue behaviour of Ti‐6Al‐4V. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2008; 473: 147‐152.
[9] Bower A. The Effect of Testing Direction on the Fatigue and Tensile Properties of a Ti‐6Al‐4V Bar. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Titanium, reported in: Fatigue Data Book: Light Structural Alloys. Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data, ASM International, 1995, ISBN 0‐87170‐607‐9.
[10] Oberwinkler B. Schwingfestigkeit von Ti‐6Al‐4V – Betrachtung mehrerer Einflussgrößen. Diploma thesis, University of Leoben, 2007.
[11] Ivanova S.G., Cohen F.S., Biederman R.R., Sisson R.D. Jr. Role of microstructure in the mean stress dependence of fatigue strength in Ti‐6Al‐4V alloy. In: Boyer R.R., Eylon D., Lütjering G., editors. Fatigue Behavior of Titanium Alloys. TMS 1999
[12] Calles W. Schwingfestigkeit und Gefügeparameter der Legierung TiAl6V4. Roell Amsler Symposium 98/99, World of Dynamic Testing, 2000, 147‐153, ISBN 3‐89653‐883‐7.
[13] Lazzeri L., Mariani U. Application of Damage Tolerance principles to the design of helicopters. International Journal of Fatigue, 2009; 31: 1039‐1045.
[14] Kitagawa H., Takahashi S. Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small cracks or cracks in the early stage. In Proceedings of the second int. conference on mech. behaviour of matls., ASM; 1976. pp. 627‐631.
[15] Oberwinkler B, Riedler M, Eichlseder W. Importance of local microstructure for damage tolerant light weight design of Ti–6Al–4V forgings. Int. J. Fatigue, 2009, Article in Press, doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.021
[16] Morrissey R.J., McDowell D.L., Nicholas T. Frequency and stress ratio effects in high cycle fatigue of Ti‐6Al‐4V. Int. J. Fatigue, 1999, 21: 679‐685
[17] Bellows R.S., Muju S., Nicholas T. Validation of the step test method for generating Haigh diagrams for Ti‐6Al‐4V. Int. J. Fatigue, 1999, 21:687‐697
[18] Leitner H. Simulation des Ermüdungsverhaltens von Aluminiumgusslegierungen. Dissertation, University of Leoben, 2001.
[19] Eichlseder W. Rechnerische Lebensdaueranalyse von Nutzfahrzeugkomponenten mit der Finite Elemente Methode. Dissertation, TU Graz, 1989.
[20] Haibach E. Betriebsfestigkeit: Verfahren und Daten zur Bauteilberechnung. Springer, 2006, ISBN 9783540293637.
[21] Oberwinkler B., Riedler M., Eichlseder W. Importance of Residual Stresses and Surface Roughness Regarding Fatigue of Titanium Forgings. J. of ASTM Int., 2009, Article in Press.
[22] Tokaji K. High cycle fatigue behaviour of Ti‐6Al‐4V alloy at elevated temperatures. Scripta Materialia, 2006; 54: 2143‐2148.
CONTACT
Name: Bernd Oberwinkler Affiliation: University of Leoben (Austria) Institute of Mechanical Engineering Address: Franz‐Josef‐Strasse 18 8700 Leoben Austria Phone: 0043 3842 / 402 ‐ 1466 Fax: 0043 3842 / 402 ‐ 1402 E‐Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.unileoben.ac.at Biography Bernd Oberwinkler was born in 1984 in Austria. He studied Mechanical Engineering at the University of Leoben (Austria) and graduated in 2007 with honors. Since 2007 Oberwinkler has been scientific assistant and PhD student at the Institute of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Leoben. In 2008, he received the Johann‐Puch‐Award for Excellence in Automotive Engineering and the Honor Award of the Austrian Motor Vehicle Association in recognition of his diploma thesis. In addition, he was awarded the Appreciation Prize of the Austrian Federal Minister for Science and Research.
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Lightweight Design of Ti-6Al-4V Forgings
B. Oberwinkler1, M. Riedler2, W. Eichlseder1 , M.F. Gutknecht3
1Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leoben, Austria2Böhl S h i d t h ik G bH & C KG K f b A t i2Böhler Schmiedetechnik GmbH & Co KG Kapfenberg, Austria
3Embraer S.A., S.J. dos Campos, Brazil
TITANIUM 2009Hawaii USA
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 1
Hawaii, USASeptember 15, 2009
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
OverviewOverview
Overview
ModelsConclusion
Material CharacterizationVerification
Experimental Results
Motivation
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 2
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
OverviewOverview
Overview
ModelsConclusion
Material CharacterizationVerification
Experimental Results
Motivation
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 3
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Lightweight Design in AviationLightweight Design in Aviation
Motivation
Airframe: 7 wt.-% Ti
Reduction of fuel consumption:~ 30 % of take-off weight is fuel
I f l dIncrease of payload
Snowball effect:1 kg reduction of a component save additional1 kg reduction of a component save additional1 kg in airplane (engine, gears, …)
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 4
Engine: 36 wt.-% Ti
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Light Weight Design of Ti-6Al-4V Structural Components
Motivation
?Design
?
?? ??
LightWeight Design
Low density
Corrosionresistance
Good mechanicalproperties
Material ProcessingLow density
Hi h t th
Ti-6Al-4V ForgingNear net shape
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 5
High strength Near net shape
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Approach for Damage Tolerant Lightweight Design
Motivation
Geometry ForgingSimulation
FE Analysis Stress Distribution
Local Microstructure
Local Stress Intensity ThresholdMicrostructure Intensity Threshold
Local Microstructural-
based S/N-Curves
Local S/N-CurvesLocal Lifetime Local Damage Tolerance
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 6
Further Influences Mean Stress, NotchesSurface, Multiax. Loading
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Approach for Damage Tolerant Lightweight Design
Motivation
Geometry ForgingSimulation
FE Analysis Stress Distribution
Local Microstructure
Local Stress Intensity ThresholdMicrostructure Intensity Threshold
Local Microstructural-
based S/N-curves
Local S/N-CurvesLocal Lifetime Local Damage Tolerance
Closed Otimization Loop
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 7
Mean Stress, NotchesSurface, Multiax. Loading Further Influences
p
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
OverviewOverview
Overview
ModelsConclusion
Material CharacterizationVerification
Experimental Results
Motivation
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 8
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Material Characterization
Material Characterization
V Shapes PancakesFeedstock billet V-Shapes PancakesFeedstock billet
Closed-die forgingForged on screw pressForging temp 930°C
Open-die forgingForged on hydraulic press
Forging temp 930°CØ230mm
As received
© Metalysis
Forging temp. 930°CTwo heats
Forging temp. 930°COne heat
As-received
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 9
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Material Characterization
Material Characterization
MA
STAR
Highdiversity
STPQ
diversity
STRA
AR…As-receivedMA…Mill-annealed
BA…Beta-annealed
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 10
MA
BA ST…Solution treatedRA…Recyrst.-annealed
STPQ…ST polymer quenched
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
OverviewOverview
Overview
ModelsConclusion
Material CharacterizationVerification
Experimental Results
Motivation
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 11
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue Behavior in Respect of MicrostructureFatigue Behavior in Respect of Microstructure
Experimental Results
Huge variation of fatigue strength and crack propagation rate
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 12
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Fatigue Behavior in Respect of Microstructure
Experimental Results
V-Shape MA Pancake ST(α+β)-content: 20%
Crack initiates in:58% (α+β)-phase
(α+β)-content: 51%
Crack initiates in:77% (α+β)-phase58% (α+β) phase
42% α-phase77% (α+β) phase
23% α-phase
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 13
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
High Cycle Fatigue in Respect of Mean Stress and Notches
Experimental Results
χ* = 0.4…0.5ΝΤ > 107
χ* < 0.4 or > 0.5
R = 0
σ Relative
Significant influence of impressed mean stress
High notch sensitivity &
σmax
σ Relativestress gradient
max
1σ
σχ ⋅=′dxd
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 14
g yno supporting effect due to stress gradient
x
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Influence of Multiaxial Loading
Experimental Results
Differences atDifferences atfinite life region
Accordance atfatigue limit
Mises equivalent stress:2 23σ σ + τ
Valid for high cycle fatigueOverestimation of shear stress in finite life region
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 15
, 3a ES nσ = σ + τ gConservative for finite life
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
OverviewOverview
Overview
ModelsConclusion
Material CharacterizationVerification
Experimental Results
Motivation
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 16
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Influence of Local Microstructure
Models
Stress intensity factor threshold
kth
Fixedpoint
f(Col)f(αp)
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 17
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Influence of Mean Stress and Notches
Models
σmax = const.
100%
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 18
Maximum stress significant for HCF100%
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
OverviewOverview
Overview
ModelsConclusion
Material CharacterizationVerification
Experimental Results
Motivation
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 19
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Verification
Verification
Geometry FE-Analyses Results
Purpose designedengine mount
Forging simulationMicrostructure distribution
Damage distribution
Computational lifetimeprediction has been done
C t t t
Finite-element analysisMises stress distribution
Allowable crack sizedistribution
Component testswill follow
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 20
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
OverviewOverview
Overview
ModelsConclusion
Material CharacterizationVerification
Experimental Results
Motivation
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 21
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
ConclusionConclusion
Conclusion
LoadSpecimens
FE-Analysis Fatigue-ModelsStress
OptimizedDurabilityGeometry Lifetime-Prediction
OptimizationMicrostructural Parameters
Forging-Simulation
Forging Optimized
Microstructural Parameters
Process Parameters
Forging pComponent
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 22
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Acknowledgements & Literature
Acknowledgments & Literature
The authors would like to thank the Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport,Innovation and Technology, the Austrian Federal Ministry of Economics and Labor,the federal governments of Vienna, Styria, Tyrol, Upper Austria and Lower Austriag y y ppand the Austrian Research Promotion Agency for the funding of this work, in theframework of the Austrian Aeronautics Research Program and FFG’s BRIDGEprogram. The support by Böhler Schmiedetechnik GmbH & Co KG is much valued.
Literature[1] Oberwinkler B. et al.: “Importance of local microstructure for damage tolerant
light weight design of Ti–6Al–4V forgings“ Int J Fatigue (2009)light weight design of Ti 6Al 4V forgings , Int. J. Fatigue (2009), doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.021, Article in Press.
[2] Oberwinkler B. et al.: “Importance of Residual Stresses and Surface Roughness Regarding Fatigue of Titanium Forgings” J of ASTM Int (2009)Roughness Regarding Fatigue of Titanium Forgings , J. of ASTM Int. (2009), Article in Press.
[3] Oberwinkler B. et al.: “Influence of Shot Peening on the Fatigue Behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V in Respect of Multiaxial Loading” 10th Int Conf on Shot Peening
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 23
Ti 6Al 4V in Respect of Multiaxial Loading , 10 Int. Conf. on Shot Peening (ICSP10), Japan, Conf. Proc., Ed. Tosha K., pp. 388-393, 2008.
University of LeobenInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
Thank you forThank you for your attention!
DI Bernd OberwinklerDI Bernd OberwinklerUniversity of LeobenUniversity of Leoben
Institute of Mechanical EngineeringInstitute of Mechanical Engineering
TITANIUM2009_OberwinklerB.ppt© MUL-AMB, 2009 24
[email protected]@unileoben.ac.atPhone: 0043 3842 / 402Phone: 0043 3842 / 402--14661466
www.unileoben.ac.atwww.unileoben.ac.at