LifeScreen v Cordis Markman Summary

download LifeScreen v Cordis Markman Summary

of 6

Transcript of LifeScreen v Cordis Markman Summary

  • 8/11/2019 LifeScreen v Cordis Markman Summary

    1/6

    Result - Accordingly, the Court finds no construction is necessary for generally cylindrical self -expanding

    body.

  • 8/11/2019 LifeScreen v Cordis Markman Summary

    2/6

    Result Accordingly, in view of the Court s finding with respect to generally cylindrical self-expandingbody, that the filtering portion may provide some expansive force in conjunction with the anchoringportion such that the filtering portion may contribute to the total force necessary to anchor, noconstruction is necessary for said resilient material urges said cylindrical body to radially expand and to

    thereby apply anchoring radial force.

    Result - As explained above with respect to generally cylindrical self -expanding body, the filtering

    portion may provide some self-expansive force which may contribute to the total force necessary toanchor the entire blood clot filter. Accordingly, in view of the Courts finding with respect to generally

    cylindrical self-expanding body , no construction is necessary for radially expandable body.

  • 8/11/2019 LifeScreen v Cordis Markman Summary

    3/6

    Result - As explained above with respect to generally cylindrical self -expanding body, the filteringportion may provide some self-expansive force which may contribute to the total force necessary toan chor the entire blood clot filter. Accordingly, in view of the Courts finding with respect to generallycylindrical self- expanding body, no construction is necessary for axially aligned elongate strands which

    cooperate to urge the anchoring portion into a generally cylindrical expanded configuration.

  • 8/11/2019 LifeScreen v Cordis Markman Summary

    4/6

    Result Accordingly, in view of the Courts resolution of the claim scope issue, no construction isnecessary for the terms concentrically aligned with said axial lumen of and concentrically alignedwith.

    Result Accordingly, in view of the Court s findings with respect to generally cylindrical self-expandingbody and axially aligned elongate strands which cooperate to urge the anchoring portion into a

  • 8/11/2019 LifeScreen v Cordis Markman Summary

    5/6

    generally cylindrical expanded configuration, no construction is necessary for axially aligned elongate

    strands which define wall portions of closed cells and which cooperate to form said cylindrical shape.

    Result - Accordingly, in the absence of any function, and significant claimed structure, the Court findsthat this term is not subject to 35 U.S.C. 112(f), and no construction is necessary.

  • 8/11/2019 LifeScreen v Cordis Markman Summary

    6/6

    Result - Accordingly, in the absence of any function, and significant claimed structure, the Court finds

    that this term is not subject to 35 U.S.C. 112(f), and no construction is necessary.