Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

21
Life After Death: Exploring Kindred Aggression against Widows in Rural southern Nigeria. Research Grant Proposal Name of Principal Investigator: Akpobome Diffre-Odiete Contact: [email protected] Statement of the Problem It is presupposed that there is a relationship between ancestor worship and the root causes and manifestations of kindred and community aggression against widows in rural southern Nigeria. There is a fear of ancestor punishment and the fear of being ostracized by the community if certain harmful mourning rituals are not conducted for widows (Odje 2003, Ilega 2001, Ubrurhe 2001, Amadiume 1995). The fear promotes aggressive practices against widows, and intimidates their sympathizers to tolerate the practice. Traditionally, it is believed that the ancestors direct how marriage and family lives are conducted. Therefore, are they responsible for the aggressive behaviour and practices of the living against widows? Why would the dead want those they once loved to suffer aggression? Do victims of these practices bear the pain as pleasurable obedience to their ancestors or do they merely tolerate their pain for fear of being ostracized by the community? How do we verify that the ancestors are the real sources of these aggressive ideas and practices? It is my conviction that a religious approach is what is needed in seeking to address these questions. An understanding of the relationship between ancestor worship and the root causes of acts of aggression against widows will help in an attempt to control the practices involved. This research therefore intends to explore the religious dimension in seeking to understand and to control these practices in order to achieve lasting solution to the situation. Widows in rural Nigeria are not only subjected to aggressive and inhumane traditional practices, but are also inherited by their deceased 1

description

It is presupposed that there is a relationship between ancestor worship and the root causes and manifestations of kindred and community aggression against widows in rural southern Nigeria. There is a fear of ancestor punishment and the fear of being ostracized by the community if certain harmful mourning rituals are not conducted for widows (Odje 2003, Ilega 2001, Ubrurhe 2001, Amadiume 1995). The fear promotes aggressive practices against widows, and intimidates their sympathizers to tolerate the practice. Traditionally, it is believed that the ancestors direct how marriage and family lives are conducted. Therefore, are they responsible for the aggressive behaviour and practices of the living against widows? Why would the dead want those they once loved to suffer aggression? Do victims of these practices bear the pain as pleasurable obedience to their ancestors or do they merely tolerate their pain for fear of being ostracized by the community? How do we verify that the ancestors are the real sources of these aggressive ideas and practices? It is my conviction that a religious approach is what is needed in seeking to address these questions.

Transcript of Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

Page 1: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

Life After Death: Exploring Kindred Aggression against Widows in Rural southern Nigeria.

Research Grant Proposal

Name of Principal Investigator: Akpobome Diffre-Odiete

Contact: [email protected]

Statement of the Problem

It is presupposed that there is a relationship between ancestor worship and the root causes and manifestations of kindred and community aggression against widows in rural southern Nigeria. There is a fear of ancestor punishment and the fear of being ostracized by the community if certain harmful mourning rituals are not conducted for widows (Odje 2003, Ilega 2001, Ubrurhe 2001, Amadiume 1995). The fear promotes aggressive practices against widows, and intimidates their sympathizers to tolerate the practice. Traditionally, it is believed that the ancestors direct how marriage and family lives are conducted. Therefore, are they responsible for the aggressive behaviour and practices of the living against widows? Why would the dead want those they once loved to suffer aggression? Do victims of these practices bear the pain as pleasurable obedience to their ancestors or do they merely tolerate their pain for fear of being ostracized by the community? How do we verify that the ancestors are the real sources of these aggressive ideas and practices? It is my conviction that a religious approach is what is needed in seeking to address these questions.

An understanding of the relationship between ancestor worship and the root causes of acts of aggression against widows will help in an attempt to control the practices involved. This research therefore intends to explore the religious dimension in seeking to understand and to control these practices in order to achieve lasting solution to the situation. Widows in rural Nigeria are not only subjected to aggressive and inhumane traditional practices, but are also inherited by their deceased husbands’ kinsmen as part of the deceased’s estate (Odje 2003, Amnesty 2005, Amadiume 1995, Otite R. 2006, Whyte 2002, Turtoe-Sanders 2007). Existing research has focused on the manifestations and effects of aggression against widows in Africa, especially in the rural areas. However, an in-depth study of the root causes of these practices has not been conducted. The causes are only mentioned in passing in research works. Research is needed in order to better understand the dynamics of these practices, including the society’s general acceptance, tolerance, and perpetuation of these practices. This will increase our understanding of how to control the phenomenon.

Aims of the Research

The overall aim of this research is to explore the root causes, manifestations and effects of aggression against widows in family relationships. However, the specific aims are:

1. to determine the root causes and effects of aggressive behaviour and practices against widows within family relationships and the wider community.

2. to document the incidence of aggressive behaviour and practices against widows as part of the mourning rituals and inheritance practices in the research communities. This

1

Page 2: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

involves methods such as observer participation, conducting of interviews, photographs and digital audio recording, to document widows’ experiences and instances of aggression in purposive sample of households.

3. to determine if community norms exist for determining the nature, level, and procedure in which kinsmen administer mourning rituals on/inheritance of widows.

4. to determine whether kinsmen deviate from the nature, level, and procedure established by community norms when administering the mourning rituals and inheritance of widows.

5. to determine the extent to which ancestor worship promotes aggressive practices against widows.

Background of the Study

Widow ritual mourning and widow inheritance are cultural practices that exist in many African societies (Whyte 2002, Onwuejeogwu 1992, Wilson 1950, Gluckman 1950, Turtoe-Sanders 2007, Ayisi 1972). In order for one to understand these practices, one must first understand the systems of marriage and kinship in African societies. Scholarly work done by A. R. Radcliff-Brown and others (1950), Lucy Mair (1974), Eric O. Ayisi (1972) and others form the basis for this understanding.

In African societies, marriage is regarded as a union of families, not just the two individuals (Odje 2003, Ubrurhe 2001, Ilega 2001, Radcliff-Brown 1950, Bottomore 1971, Amadiume 1995, Ayisi 1972, Caldwell 1990). Moreover, the definition of what constitutes a family in these societies includes the living and the dead members of the kin group (Kuper 1950, Mair 1974). As such, certain rules have to be observed in order to maintain the solidarity of the relationship between the families (Ayisi 1972). Marriage is therefore, a religious affair (Ilega 2011). Thus ancestor worship plays a role in family affairs since the ancestors are seen as the guardians of the family. They direct family affairs through divination, and are capable of inflicting illness, death and other forms of punishment on those who go astray from the norms (Ilega 2001, Odje 2003, Otite R. 2006). This belief is so strong among the Urhobo of southern Nigeria that it influences all aspects of their daily lives, including their traditional oral poetry, which serves as a voice for the dead and the living (Ojaide 2003, Darah 2005, Okpako 2011). Another aspect of how spirit forces are believed to influence daily life among the Urhobo is the concept of iphri. Iphri literally means “argument”, and is the spirit of an aggressive ancestor being reincarnated in a new member of the family. It inspires aggressive behaviour in such individual, who is expected to carve a wooden sculpture that accommodates the iphri. Whenever he is moved to act aggressively, he offers an offering of appeasement through the sculpture to the ancestral iphri. This “helps to re-establish the equilibrium essential for peaceful social relationships” (Foss 2004: 59). Like the case of the Kalabari (Horton in Kottak 2004 [1978]), also of southern Nigeria, the iphri sculpture is not carved for aesthetic reasons, but to “house” the spirit of the aggressive ancestor that has reincarnated himself in the person. Thus, the fear of incurring the displeasure and wrath of the ancestors constitute the most effective sanction when it comes to property inheritance and family matters among the Urhobo (Odje 2003).

In general, marriage is viewed from four perspectives in Nigeria. Islamic marriage is practiced among the Muslims of the northern parts. In other parts of the country, Christian, statutory and customary types of marriage practices exist. However, even when couples marry under statutory law or as Christians in southern Nigeria, customary practice is what generally prevails in family

2

Page 3: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

matters (IRBC 2006). According to the customary law, a married woman is regarded as property of her husband, and can therefore not benefit from the estate of her deceased husband, rather, she is to be inherited, like any other property, by the deceased’s kinsmen. She is also subjected to certain mourning rituals before she is to be inherited. Any attempt by the widow or her sympathizers to alter these practices may result in aggression against her. These practices are prevalent among various ethnic groups in Nigeria (Onwuejeogwu 1992, Amadiume 1995, Turtle-Sanders 2007, Odje 2003, Otite R. 2006, Edet in Kunhiyop 2008, Genyi 2013).

The mourning rituals that the bereaved widow goes through are religious as well as socio-cultural in nature. They are meant to humble the widow (Ezejiofor 2011), to show respect to the departed husband, and to prove that the widow has no hand in the death of her husband, either by poisoning or by witchcraft (Turtle-Sanders 2007). They also help to sever the marital union with the husband who is now deceased (Dickson 1997) in preparation for inheritance marriage to the deceased’s kinsman.

Inheritance and mourning practices often involve acts of aggression against widows. There are various reports of inhumane practices during the mourning period. These include sexual harassment (Ezejiofor 2011); imposed shaving of the head with unsterilized objects, sleeping on the dirty bare floor for several months, naked ritual walk to the market place at dawn, kidnapping, disinheritance, restricted number of bathes (Whyte 2002); accusations of witchcraft (Ezejiofor 2011); derogatory names (Otite O. 2003); drinking the water used to wash the husband’s corpse (Edet in Kunhiyop 2008); imposed fasting, ejection from the home (Ezejiofor 2011, Turtle-Sanders 2007); and exposure to HIV and AIDS (UNDP Nigeria 2006). Although some of the listed practices seem to be induced by broken relationship between the deceased’s kinsfolk and the widow, they usually use religion, particularly the ancestors, as the excuse and authority for their actions (Ezejiofor 2011, Whyte 2002). The condition of the widow have, however, been ameliorated through the influence of Christianity, which regards many of these practices as pagan and inhumane (Whyte 2002).

Research Site

I purposely selected three communities in southern Nigeria: Eziokpor and Ephron-Oto in Delta State and Ukpom-Abak in Akwa Ibom State of Nigeria for this research because of their rural setting and their high adherence to traditions. This will help to capture the practices in their natural setting.

Eziokpor is a traditional Ukwani clan, located some 3 km from Abraka where the Delta state university is located. The Ukwani people are related to the Igbo of eastern Nigeria in linguistic and cultural affinity. Eziokpor clan comprises of three closely located villages: Eziokpor Obi-Ego, Eziokpor Umu-Oshi, and Eziokpor Unor. The system of government here is male gerontocracy. The eldest woman, Ada, performs the mourning rituals for widows. I have good contacts with the community leaders here.

Ephron-Oto is a small village-kingdom with a population of about 1,200 inhabitants. The village is located in the middle of Urhoboland, with only one access road. My visit there for linguistic research in 2010, 2013, and April 2014 has familiarized me with the people, their culture and their language, which is closely related to mine.

3

Page 4: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

Ukpom-Abak is a village of the Anang people of southern Nigeria. They are culturally related to the Efik. Ukpom-Abak has villages in the interior parts of the tropical forests of the Niger Delta. I lived in Ikot-Iyere, one of the villages of Ukpom-Abak from 2003 to 2006 where I also learnt the people’s culture and language during my days of studentship at a Bible college.

Significance of the Research

By investigating the relationship between ancestor worship and kindred aggression against widows, this project builds on existing efforts to establish a more comprehensive framework for a better understanding and control of aggression in relation to family relationships. Understanding how ancestor worship and religious beliefs influence aggression against widows will contribute to efforts to understand the dynamics involved in conflict over inheritance matters in family relationships. The project has practical applications for the management of gender-related conflicts over estate inheritance and the place of women in the society. In many Nigerian societies where majority of people do not make a will, and where the cultures do not encourage it, the death of the husband, who is usually the breadwinner, usually creates an economic breakdown and thus an avenue for conflict, violence and dominance over property inheritance. During such crisis, the widow is usually the first victim of accusations, economic sanction, and aggressive abuses. This project will contribute to aspects of social science research such as conflict management.

Literature Review

Simmel (1904), Freud, Durbin, Bowlby and others (in Bottomore 1971), have long posited the notion of an aggressive instinct in human nature. However, Bottomore (1971) argues that such position is inconclusive in an attempt to provide a complete explanation for the occurrence of aggression. This is so, as aggressive instinct can be regulated and controlled like other instincts. He argues that conflicts do not occur all the time, and therefore saw the need for an investigation into the social conditions that lead to conflicts. Simmell (1904) had earlier on asserted that the sociological significance of conflict is, in principle, never contested. Writing on the root causes of conflicts in Africa, Otite and Obagbinoko (2008) argue that a particular kind of conflict and violence is incidentally a reflection of the factors that give rise to the conflict in question, particularly socio-economic conflicts that arise from socio-economic deprivation.

The belief systems of people, particularly in Africa, cannot be successfully divorced from the sociology of conflict. Weber (1952 [1946]) argues that there is a relationship between interest-situations such as economic and political factors and the religiosity of people. Moreover, as earlier stated, the socio-economic situation of a given society determines whether conflict occurs or not. It therefore seems that both the aggressive instinct and the religiosity of people arise from their socio-economic situation.

However, Bailey (1966) offers a different view, emphasising an anthropological explanation for how religious beliefs influence the socio-economic lives of people. He observes that each society has a customary apparatus of ideas, through which its members understand the world around them as well as the working of their own society. These ideas are usually linked to supernatural origin and they guide the actions of the people (Nidia 1978).

4

Page 5: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

In a study of socio-religious matters, it is usually difficult to determine the boundary between religion and social phenomena (Nidia 1978) because of the fusion that exists between religion and culture (Ezejiofor 2011). This explains why kinsmen adhere to traditional mourning and inheritance practices and the general tolerance of aggressive practices towards widows. Earlier in the background of the study, I have explained the people’s belief concerning the role of the ancestors in marriage and general family affairs. The influence of traditional religious practices on the people is so strong that even a Supreme Court Justice of Nigeria once wrote to support the view that the widow is part of the “immovable estate of her deceased husband” (Odje 2003:401). The implication of this belief is that widows are therefore being treated, not primarily as fellow humans, but as a possession to be acquired.

Realizing that the behaviour of kinsmen towards widows is inhumane, several attempts have been made to address the problem. However, the problem is only being suppressed and the practices being forced underground in the urban areas, while it is still being practiced in rural areas. Even people who spend all their lives in the cities are being affected because when they eventually die, their corpses are taken to their rural homeland for burial. There, the widow is also subjected to aggressive rituals, and if she objects, the deceased’s kinsmen may go to the city to seize their deceased brother’s property (Whyte 2002).

There are a number of United Nations (UN) Conventions and Covenants aimed at controlling violence, discrimination and human rights abuses against women. Nigeria is a party to these and other international treaties (CRR in IRBC 2006). The federal and some state governments of Nigeria have also made further attempts through legislative reforms, judicial intervention and other means (Emery in Ezejiofor 2011, IRBC 2006). Women-led non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have also contributed through advocacy and participation in international conferences aimed at alleviating the plight of women (Whyte 2002). However, Ezejiofor (2011) laments that though these are positive moves, they have not actually brought an end to the numerous cases of aggression and violence against widows in Nigeria, because these approaches, including the UN guiding principles are routinely ignored (Aboribo and Okoro 2008).

The need to do further research on the root causes of the problem and ways to seek a lasting amelioration cannot be overemphasized. Peterman (2011) laments the scarcity of large-scale empirical research on the subject and calls for further in-depth country-specific research and analysis. Emery (in Ezejiofor 2011) calls for multi-faceted approach in order to engage with different audiences and loci of power. Sociologists and anthropologists in Nigeria have recently made a public call for a holistic approach that must include scholarly research into the political and religious backgrounds of violence in Nigeria (Ogunsola 2014).

The Nigerian experience shows that social problems that are rooted in religious backgrounds cannot be solved solely through secular approaches. Although religion has been used as a tool for fomenting violence, the resurgence of interest in the study of religion in the present century is evidenced by symposia, conferences and projects that are being organized by universities and other scholarly bodies around the world (Ejenobo and Akpobome 2013).

The focus of previous research on the subject of kindred aggression against widows is mainly on the manifestations and effects of the problem. The causes have only been referred to in passing and have not been adequately studied. This proposed project seeks to complement existing knowledge by exploring religion, amongst other social-economic factors, as root causes of the

5

Page 6: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

problem. I am convinced that a better understanding of the root causes will contribute greatly to an increased understanding of how to control the phenomenon.

Research Method and Procedure

Hypothesis: The central research question is, is there a relationship between ancestor worship and the root causes and manifestations of kindred aggression against widows in rural southern Nigeria? From this, the hypothesis emerges: the fear of ancestor punishment and of being ostracized by the community promotes aggressive practices against widows and its tolerance by the victims and their sympathizers.

Research Procedure: The research will take two phases. I will select and train a research assistant for each of the two phases. Having had a close rapport with the communities previously, I will only re-establish contact in each phase. An established rapport with them will help to form an environment that is conducive for informants to respond. While going about re-establishing rapport, I will also select purposive sample of currently mourning widows and those who have completed their mourning rituals for participant observation and ethnographic interviews. Those who have completed their mourning will no longer be under kindred scrutiny and monitoring, so they may be more responsive without hindrance. Participant observation will be the primary method for data collection. Considering the cultural practices during most of the mourning period and the fear of being ostracized, participant observation is more suitable for documenting the experiences of the affected widows. I will balance my level of participation in the daily activities of the people I observe with ethnographic interviews that I will conduct with other members of the affected households such as adult children and other relatives. I will also conduct in-depth interviews with key informants chosen from among the kinsmen of the deceased, community leaders and the general populace.

Research Schedule: This is a one – year research project from which a final report will be produced in December 2015. In order to meet up this goal, my proposed schedule is as follows:

Phase 1: Work at first two sites (January - June) : I will spend three months each at Eziokpor and Ephron-Otor during which I will re-establish rapport with the community members, select purposive sample, key informants, and set up pre-test protocol for purposive sample interview. I will observe daily activities, conduct unstructured interviews with affected widows and households, and semi-structured interview with key informants. Transcription of the narratives will be on going, with the aid of the research assistant.

Phase 2: Work at third site, data analysis, and final report (July - December): The distance between Ukpom-Abak and the first two sites will make me spend the next three months (July – September) there separately. I will follow the same procedure at the last site. This phase will conclude with data analysis and final report (October - December).

Data Collection

A combination of various methods will be used for data collection. This is to help yield the best results. Participant observation will be the primary method. This will be combined with other qualitative methods such as unstructured household interviews and semi-structured interview of key informants. During these interviews and observations, I will document life histories using field notes (jottings, diaries, and log) and digital sound recording, with the permission of the

6

Page 7: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

respondents. Wherever permitted and possible, I will also take photographs of events. Laura Muller’s (Benard 2006) use of the combined methods in the study of gender harassment in various United States Army posts was considered successful.

Sampling: Since widows’ mourning practices do not involve any form of organized network among widows, a systematic random sampling is very difficult. Therefore, purposive sampling method will be employed because of its usefulness for building a sampling frame for small populations that are difficult to find (Benard 2006). Affected households and key informants will be selected through purposive sampling. This will help to maximize variation on the independent variables (Bernard 2006) such as religious affiliation of the deceased, his household, his kinsmen, and the key informants and widow’s profession and social status. A purposive sample of 60 affected households will be selected (20 from each of the research sites). Additional 60 key informants (20 from each site) will be recruited through a priori analytic framework (Johnson 1990), that is, diverse social settings that are characterized by informants’ status and access to various experiences in the community. Such status include relationship to the deceased, social status (do they have a say in community decision-making processes?), gender, knowledge of community norms, age, religious affiliation, and personal belief on the plight of widows. The total number of respondents will be 120. Using various respondents will allow me to check and crosscheck their narratives and assessment of norms with each other.

Participant Observation: Bernard (2006:368) puts it that participant observation is a “strategic method that lets you learn what you want to learn and apply all the data collection methods that you may want to apply”. It involves getting close to people while making them comfortable enough for you to observe and collect the needed data. This method is paramount to this study because its objective from the beginning is to solve a human problem (Bernard 2006), in this case, the problem of aggression against widows in rural southern Nigeria. Although culture shock may be anticipated in this method, Bernard (2006) recommends that doing daily highly task-oriented work, and making clinical methodological field notes about ones feelings will help minimize the shock.

Unstructured Household Interviews and Life Histories: Due to the mood of mourning widows and cultural restraints, unstructured interviews will be an excellent way to establish rapport (Benard 2006) with the the widows, their households, and the Umuada, daughters of the land that monitor the activities of the widow (Whyte 2002). In addition to this, life histories relating to widows’ aggressive experiences will be collected. The aim of collecting the life histories is to document the incidences of aggressive experiences, to help determine the root causes and effects of these practices. It will also help to compare the widows’ experiences with the narratives of key informants to determine if kinsmen deviate from the level and procedure established by community norms (if there are) for administering the mourning rituals and inheritance practices. I will allocate at least 5 hours per meeting to each of the the 60 purposive sample households for observation, unstructured interviews and life history documentation. The interviews will be conducted with the widows whenever possible, and/or with their children and family members, when not possible. Their sympathizers and the community’s monitoring team may also be interviewed. Their responses will be verified with one another, and with those of other households.

Semi-structured interviews with Key Informants: Using semi-structured interviews, I will interview 60 key informants selected from the communities, who are traditional leaders, elders,

7

Page 8: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

kinsmen of the deceased, traditional priests and religious practitioners, and other key actors in the aggressive practices. The aims of the semi-structured interviews with these informants are to determine the root causes of aggressive practices and behaviour against widows, to determine if community norms exist for the practices, the nature, level and procedure for these practices and to determine the extent to which ancestor worship motivates aggression against widows. At least 3 hours per meeting will be spent with each of the 60 key informants. Several of such meetings will be held during the allotted research period.

Data Analysis

Several methods will be used for the analysis of the data collected. These include Ground Theory, Analytic Induction, and the use of Causal Flow Charts. These will involve my identifying and organizing themes as well as the use of systematic logic (Bernard 2006).

Ground Theory: I will use Ground Theory method in the process of transcribing and coding the life histories and the interview data. This method (Bernard 2006) helps the analyst become more grounded in the data, which leads to a better understanding as one closely studies the text. The procedure involves the construction of theoretical models based on the relationship of the different themes that arise from a study of the data. The grounded theory method will help to detect the relationship between ancestor worship as a religious practice and the root causes of aggressive treatment of widows in rural southern Nigeria.

Analytic Induction: An additional method of data analysis to be employed is the analytic induction. Through this method, causal explanations of the phenomena will be built from a close examination of the cases presented in the data (Bernard 2006). This method will further test my hypothesis which states that the fear of ancestors’ punishment and the fear of being ostracized by the community promote aggressive practices against widows and its tolerance by the victims and their sympathizers. This will be done by examining each single case of aggressive experience as narrated by the 60 purposive sample households. If one explanation fits the hypothesis, every one of them will be tested until all either fits it or falsifies it (Bernard 2006).

Causal Flow Charts: Causal Flow Charts consist of a set of boxes that are connected by a set of arrows. These boxes describe states (such as being a widow), and the arrows indicate how one state leads to another, such as how the state of being a widow leads to that of being a victim of aggression. This is a method used for interpretation or representation of ideas, which arise from a study of data, observation of patterns, and arrival at a conclusion about the causes of things (Bernard 2006).

Selection and Training of Research Assistant

I will hire one student from the Department of Languages and Linguistics, Delta State University, Abraka to assist me with the transcription of the interviews and life histories at the first two sites. The university is located about 3 km from Eziokpor. My affiliation with the Department as an alumni and ex-President of the students’ association there will facilitate my hiring of a student. For work at site 3, I will hire a student from the Linguistics department of the University of Uyo, located 10 km from the research site. I have good relationship with a professor who is the past head of the department.

Investigator Competence

8

Page 9: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

I have a Diploma and a B. A. in Religious Studies. I also have a B. A. in Linguistics and Urhobo studies. In addition, I am currently studying for my Master of Divinity degree. During my study of linguistics and Urhobo (the language, land, history, and culture of one of the peoples of southern Nigeria), I also took courses in cultural and linguistic anthropology. Levi-Srauss (1952) argues that the works of Schrader and Benedict demonstrate the important role of linguists in the anthropological study of kinship. I have also taken courses in missionary anthropology. Over eight years of studying the religions, cultures and languages of the peoples of Nigeria prepares me for this research on kindred aggression, motivated by religious beliefs, against widows in rural Nigeria. The research question on which this proposal is based stems from issues arising from an independent research I conducted in three clans of the Urhobo people. The research, supported by Foundation for Endangered Languages, Berth, U.K., resulted in the documentation and publishing of a word list on noun and verb groups related to family relationships and other cultural domains. During that research, widows made up over 50% of my respondents. I have participated in seminars, conferences, and workshops held by religious and academic institutions, which dwell on issues of security and peaceful coexistence in Nigeria. I have also done course work and independent studies in research design and cognitive research methods.

I have worked under Prof. G. G. Darah’s direction in research projects involving travels in most parts of what constitutes the present research site. As Professor of Oral Literature and Folklore, Darah has supervised me while conducting unstructured and semi-structured interviews, documentation, and transcription of narratives. I already have good contacts with the local communities and traditional leaders. Therefore, this rapport will be useful to this research project.

9

Page 10: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

ReferencesAboribo, R. Igho and Nathaniel Okoro

2008 Managing the Consequences of Conflict. In Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution. Vol. V. Andrew Ohwona, Douglason Omotor, and Augustin Atubi, eds. Abraka: Delta State University Press.

Amadi, Elech1982 Ethics in Nigerian Culture. Ibadan: Heinemann.

Amadiume, Ifi1995 Igbo. In Encyclopedia of World Cultures, vol. IX: Africa and the Middle East. John

Middleton and Amal Rassam, vol. eds. New York: G.K. Hall and Company. Electronic document. http://www.armchairpatriot.com/Encyclopedias/Encyclopedia%20of%20World%20Cultures%20Volume%209-Africa%20and%20the%20Middle%20East.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2014.

Amnesty International Nigeria2005 Unheard Voices: Violence Against Women in the Family. Electronic document.

http://amnesty.org/en/library/info/AFR44/004/2005/en. Accessed 24 May 2014. Ayisi, Eric O.

1972 An Introduction to the Study of African Culture. London: Heinemann. Bailey, F. G.

1966 Anthropology. In A Guide to the Social Sciences. Norman MacKenzie, ed. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Bernard, H. Russell2006 Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Walnut

Creek: AltaMira Press. Electronic document. http://www.antropocaos.com.ar/Russel-Research-Method-in-Anthropology.pdf#page=815&zoom=auto,-182,380. Accessed 24 May 2014.

Bottomore, T. B. 1971 Sociology: A Guide to Problems and Literature. Rev.ed. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Caldwell, John C. and Pat Caldwell1990 Cultural Forces Tending to Sustain High Fertility. In Population Growth and

Reproduction in Sub-Saharan Africa: Technical Analysis of Fertility and Its Consequences. George T. F. Acsadi, Gwendolyn Johnson-Ascadi, Rudolfo A. Bulatao (eds.). Washington DC: The World Bank. Electronic document. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1990/04/01/000009265_3980624143623/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2014.

Darah, G. G. 2005 Battles of Song: Udje Tradition of the Urhobo. Lagos: Malthouse.

David T.E. and Akpobome Diffre-Odiete 2013 Beyond Amnesty: Religion as a Tool for Homeland Security in Nigeria. In

Journal of Arts and Contemporary Society, Vol.5, No.1, 67-81.

10

Page 11: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

Dickson, Kwesi1997 The Theology of the Cross. In A Reader in African Christian Theology. John

Parratt, ed. London: SPCK.Ezejiofor, Austin Obinna

2011 Patriachy, Marriage and the Rights of Widows in Nigeria. In Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities, vol.12, No 1.

Foss, Perkins2004 Where Gods and Mortals Meet: Continuity and Renewal in Urhobo Art. New

York: Museum for African Art. Geny, George Akwaya and Member Euginia George-Genyi

2013 Widowhood and Nigerian Womanhood: Another Context of Gendered Poverty in Nigeria. In Research on Humanities and Social Science, vol 3. No 7; 2013. Electronic document. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/viewFile/5584/5697. Accessed 24 May 2014.

Gluckman, Max1950 Kinship and Marriage among the Lozi of Northern Rhodesia and the Zulu of Natal.

In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. A. R. Radcliff-Brown and Daryll Forde, eds. London: Oxford University Press.

Ilega, Daniel I. 2001 Marriage Among the Urhobo. In Studies in Art, Religion and Culture Among the

Urhobo and Isoko People. G. G. Darah, E. S. Akama, and J. T. Agberia, eds. Port Harcourt: Pam Unique Publishers.

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRBC)2006  Nigeria: Levirate marriage practices among the Yoruba, Igbo and Hausa-Fulani;

consequences for a man or woman who refuses to participate in the marriage; availability of state protection (February 2006), 16 March 2006, NGA101045.E. Electronic document. http://www.refworld.org/docid/45f1478811.html [accessed 26 May 2014]

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRBC)2000 Nigeria: Prevalence of forced/arranged marriages within the Urhobo/Itsekiri

community in Warri, Niger Delta, including age at which girls marry, consequences of refusal, and availability of state protection, 4 August 2000, NGA34915.E. Electronic document. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6ad7068.html [accessed 26 May 2014]

Johnson, Jeffrey C.1990 Selecting Ethnographic Informants. Newbury Park, CA.: SAGE Publications.

Kottak, Conrad Phillip2004 [1978] Anthropology: Exploration of Human Diversity. New York: McGraw Hill

Kunhiyop, Samuel Waje2008 African Christian Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI.: Hippo Books.

Kuper, Hilda1950 Kinship Among the Swazi. In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. A. R.

Radcliff-Brown and Daryll Forde, eds. London: Oxford University Press. Levi-Strauss, Claude

11

Page 12: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

1952 Selections from Structural Anthropology. In Great Books of the Western World, vol. 58. Mortimer J. Adler, ed. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.

Mair, Lucy1974 African Societies. London: Cambridge University Press.

Nidia, Eugene A.1978 Religion: Communication with the Supernatural. In Readings in Missionary

Anthropology II. William A. Smalley, ed. South Pasadena, CA.: William Carey Library.

Oboh, Godwin E.2008 Conflict Management: Alternative Dispute Resolution Spectrum. In Peace Studies

and Conflict Resolution. Vol. V. Andrew Ohwona, Douglason Omotor, and Augustin Atubi (eds.). Abraka: Delta State University Press.

Odje, Mudiaga2003 Succession Among the Urhobo. In The Urhobo People. Onigu Otite, ed. Ibadan:

Shaneson.Ogunsola, Oladele

Daily Independent, Monday, July 14, 2014.Ojaide, Tanure

2003 Poetry, Performance, and Art: Udje Dance Songs of the Urhobo People. Durham, NC.: Carolina Academic Press.

Okpako, David T2011 Kpeha’s Song: Ethics and Culture in Urhobo Udje Poetry. Ibadan: BookBuilders.

Onwuejeogwu, M. Angulu1992 The Social Anthropology of Africa: An Introduction. Ibadan: Heinemann.

Otite, Atare and Clement Obagbinoko2008 Root Causes of Conflict and Violence in Africa. In Peace Studies and Conflict

Resolution. Vol. V. Andrew Ohwona, Douglason Omotor, and Augustin Atubi, eds. Abraka: Delta State University Press.

Otite, Onigu2003 Political Institutions. In The Urhobo People. Onigu Otite, ed. Ibadan: Shaneson.

Otite, R. E.2006 The Urhobo Woman. Ibadan: Gold Press.

Peterman, Amber2011 Widowhood and Asset Inheritance in sub-saharan Africa: Empirical Evidences

from 15 Countries. Working Paper. June 2011; No. 183. Chronic Poverty research Centre. Electronic document. http://www.chronicpoverty.org/uploads/publication_files/WP183%20Peterman.pdf. Accessed May 26, 2014.

Phiri, Isabel Apawo1997 Doing Theology as African Women. In A Reader in African Christian Theology.

John Parratt, ed. London: SPCK.Radcliff-Brown, A. R.

1950 Introduction In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. A. R. Radcliff-Brown and Daryll Forde, eds. London: Oxford University Press.

Richard, A. I.

12

Page 13: Life After Death, Exploring Kindred Aggression Against Widows in Rural Nigeria

1950 Some Types of Family Structure Among the Central Bantu. In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. A. R. Radcliff-Brown and Daryll Forde, eds. London: Oxford University Press.

Simmel, Georg1904 The Sociology of Conflict I. In American Journal of Sociology, vol. 9, Issue 4. 490-

525. A. W. Small (trans.). Electronic document. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9602%28190401%299%3A4%3C490%3ATSOCI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X. Accessed 25 June 2014.

Turtle-Sanders, Patience2007 African General Traditions in Marriage. Minneapolis, MS.: Celebrate Life.

Ubrurhe, J. O.2001 Polygyny and African Christianity: The Urhobo Experience. In Studies in Art, Religion and Culture Among the Urhobo and Isoko People. G. G. Darah, E. S. Akama, and J. T. Agberia, eds. Port Harcourt: Pam Unique Publishers.

UNDP2006 Niger Delta Human Development Report. Abuja: UNDP.

http:web.ng.undp.org/reports/nigeria_hdr_report.pdf. Accessed 26 May, 2014. Weber, Max

1952 [1946] Selections from Essays in Sociology. In Great Books of the Western World, vol. 58. Mortimer J. Adler, ed. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.

Wilson, Monica1950 Nyakyusa Kinship. In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage. A. R. Radcliff-

Brown and Daryll Forde, eds. London: Oxford University Press. Whyte, Adaobi

2002 The Plight of the Nigerian Woman. Ibadan: Evans Brothers Limited.

13