P&ICLUBS – COMPENSATION OF VICTIMS OF AN OIL POLLUTION ACCIDENT
Lessons learned from V.R.E.t. with 200 accident victims: a review of 50 consecutive cases
-
Upload
uriah-jimenez -
Category
Documents
-
view
27 -
download
5
description
Transcript of Lessons learned from V.R.E.t. with 200 accident victims: a review of 50 consecutive cases
David WalsheCork, Ireland
Diagnosis at 1 year post accident (Mayou R 2001)
Accident Phobia 17%
P.T.S.D. 17%
G.A.D. 18%
Combination VR software +video games effective Walshe et al (2003)
‘tweaking the systemIncreasing immersionrate from 50% to 92%
Walshe et al (2005)
taping sessions useful Walshe et al (2006)
QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Sex: M 14, F 36
Age: 25-77 yrs Mean = 44 yrs
VR range 4-25 Mean = 7 sessions
Drop outs = 16
More than 1 dx = 30 (60%)
Litigants= 34/50 (68%)
60% >1 diagnosis(P.T.S.D., anxiety disorder,
depression, panic disorder,)
Pharmacotherapy taped imaginal
exposure E.M.D.R.
Drop-outs Anxiety factors V.R.E.T. can be counter-
productive
Compensation factors (68% litigants)
Expect success from VRET 70% ‘non phobic’ if
complete treatment but warn of possibility of
residual anxiety
‘Exposure in vivo’ or V.R.E.T. Driving
exposure
link with driving instructor ? +
virtual car? - better software for
VR/games + ‘px’. video games
-