Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

download Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

of 15

Transcript of Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    1/15

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    2/15

    To discuss the origin of argumentation and

    debate in the world and Philippine contexts;

    To understand the definition of debate

    propositions; To clarify the nature of proof and

    presumptions; and

    To understand the theory of issues.

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    3/15

    Are Filipinos generally argumentative?

    Where did we get our argumentativeness?

    How do we exercise it?

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    4/15

    Debate originated in Ancient Greece.

    Protagoras, the Inventor of Fallacies (fallo- I

    deceive) and Father of debate vs. Socrates-

    the greatest ethician St. Thomas Aquinas of the Middle Ages

    presented his SummaTheologiae

    The lingua franca of debating was Latin.

    The method was dialectic (Q&A).

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    5/15

    Debating has reached the English-speaking

    countries around 1400.

    The 1st recorded intercollegiate debate was

    between Cambridge and Oxford.Oxford Union debate is the oldest

    international debate society in the world.

    In 1892, US ushered in debate with Harvard

    vs. Yale with memorized speeches and nodefinite winner.

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    6/15

    Balagtasan is the earliest form of debate.

    Balagtasans uniqueness is found on its

    impromptu nature.

    It also has verses that must rhyme once said. Filipino is the language used.

    The Thomasites introduced the Oxford-

    Oregon format to the Filipino Forensic

    Debating.

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    7/15

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    8/15

    The cause is hidden, but the result is fire.

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    9/15

    It is the statement in which anything

    whatsoever is affirmed or denied of the

    subject.

    It is something expressed in a completestatement.

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    10/15

    Proposition of Fact- concerns with the truth

    or falsity of an act of judgment. Is it true?

    Proposition of Policy- concerns with the

    wisdom or unwisdom, doabilty or non-doabilty, of a course of action. Is it wise?

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    11/15

    Parliamentary: bill, resolution, motion

    Club or school organization: motion from the

    floor

    Court of law: form of a pleading which arefound in complaint, information, petition,

    motion.

    Sanguniang Bayan: ordinance, resolution,

    motion

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    12/15

    It must express only one act of judgment.

    It must be stated in the form of an

    affirmation, not in the form of a negation.

    It must be debatable. It must be univocal.

    It must never be biased or prejudiced.

    It must be stated in simple and concise

    language.

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    13/15

    It must not contain any form of abstraction

    or generalization.

    It must be relevant to the times.

    It must be so worded so that the burden ofproof will automatically fall on the

    affirmative side.

    It must be of interest to all.

    It must never contain technical terms notcomprehensible by the average reasonable

    person (ARP)

    It must not have been over-debated.

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    14/15

    Trace the origin of debate from the earliest

    time.

    How was debate introduced in the

    Philippines?What is a debate proposition?

    What are kinds of debate proposition?

    What are the forms of propositions?

    What are the qualities of a good debate

    proposition?

  • 8/3/2019 Lesson E2-Nature of Argument

    15/15

    Form a group of 5 to 8 students.

    Develop propositions of facts and policies.