Lecture 8 PSB Tri 3 09 Pricing GECO6410
-
Upload
venkataiims -
Category
Documents
-
view
117 -
download
3
Transcript of Lecture 8 PSB Tri 3 09 Pricing GECO6410
GECO 6410 Week Eight Pricing Strategies: Creating & Sustaining CA
Source: Boyes Ch 8 Pindyck and Rubinfeld Ch. 11) (short loans on line)
Outline1. Pricing in context2. Price Discrimination3. Intertemporal Price Discrimination and Peak-
Load Pricing 4. Two-Part Tariff5. Bundling 6. Mark-up pricing7. Summary
Part 1 Pricing in contextPart 1 Pricing in context
It is one of the issues managers are most It is one of the issues managers are most concerned with.concerned with.
Pricing strategies (i.e. charging different Pricing strategies (i.e. charging different prices to different customers for similar prices to different customers for similar goods & services) are a way that goods & services) are a way that producers capture consumer surplus.producers capture consumer surplus.
Seeking Competitive Advantage: Pricing Strategies
Pricing is an important strategic tool, acknowledge by managers across industries.Part of the broad pursuit of sustaining c.a. through barriers to entry. However, a small percentage of managers know much about consumer's response to price
Seeking Competitive Advantage: Pricing Strategies
Key Questions: Have Internet buying/selling and auctions turned all businesses into price takers? ( i.e. a perfectly competitive outcome)? How prices are determined on the Internet?
P = MC ( no differentiation)P >MR=MC (some differentiation)
See Boyes pp. 163 -166
Seeking Competitive Advantage: Pricing Strategies
While MC =MR is the fundamental approach to pricing, firms face numerous complications while setting prices. Firms selling more than one product (super markets, department and discount stores) There is more than one market segmentDifferent selling environment and market structures Link between price and quality and consumers’ perceptionDifferent customers have different capacity to pay for the same good or service
Most Important Marketing Issues (Source: Dolan and Simon 1996 cited
in Boyes 2004: 163)
Management Knowledge (Source: Clancy and
Shulman 1994 cited in Boyes 2004: 163)
The challenge
The challenge is to capture as much of the consumer surplus as possible. It is the prices which are above MC. It can only work if a firm has some market power.
Consumer Surplus
Quantity Quantity
Price Price
Demand Demand
A
B BC
ConsumerSurplus
Initial Consumer Surplus
Consumer surplus toNew consumers
Additional consumerSurplus to initial consumer
P1 P1
P2
Q1 Q1 Q2
A
B C
D EF
Willingness to pay The maximum amount that a buyer will pay for a good
Consumer surplusA buyer’s willingness to pay less the amount the buyer actually pays
Capturing Consumer Surplus
Quantity
$/Q
D
MR
Pmax
MC If price is raised above P*, the firm will lose
sales and reduce profit.
PC
PC is the pricethat would exist in
a perfectly competitivemarket.
A
P*
Q*
P1
Between 0 and Q*, consumerswill pay more than
P*--consumer surplus (A).
B
P2
Beyond Q*, price willhave to fall to create a consumer surplus (B).
Capturing Consumer Surplus
Quantity
$/Q
D
MR
Pmax
MCPC
A
P*
Q*
P1
B
P2
QuestionHow can the firm
capture the consumer surplusin A and sell profitably in B?
AnswerPrice discrimination
Two-part tariffsBundling
Part 2 Price Part 2 Price DiscriminationDiscrimination
First degree First degree Second degreeSecond degree Third degreeThird degree
Price Discrimination
Price discrimination is the practice of selling the same good at different prices to different customers, even though the costs for producing for the two customers are the same
Price Discrimination
Price discrimination is not possible when a good is sold in a competitive market since there are many firms all selling at the market price. In order to price discriminate, the firm must have some market power
Forms of Price Discriminations First-Degree or Perfect discrimination
Each consumer is charged according to his/her maximum willingness to pay (e.g. bargaining, auctions)
Second-Degree Price discriminationDifferent price for different quantity (e.g.
1 Pizza for $6.95 and 2 for $12.95) Third-Degree Price discrimination
Dividing consumers into 2 or more groups with separate demand curves (e.g. discounted prices for students or senior citizens). Separation by different elasticities of demand.
First-Degree Price Discrimination and Personalized
Pricing Technology, the Internet and personalized
pricing firms are able to learn more about customers’ likings and disliking. Pricing based upon postal code ( rich
suburbs pay more for an identical product)
Pricing based upon an individual’s price elasticity of demand
One-to-one marketing” perfect price discrimination to extract maximum consumer surplus
Price Discrimination
First Degree Price Discrimination Charge a separate price to each customer:
the maximum or reservation price they are willing to pay.
Deadweight Loss(e.g. how tax affects welfare)
Quantity0
Price
Demand
Supply
Q1
A
BC
F
D E
Q2
Tax reduces consumer surplus by (B+C) and producer surplus by (D+E)
Tax revenue = (B+D)
Deadweight Loss = (C+E)
Price buyerspay = PB
P1
Price without tax
=
PSPrice sellers receive
=
Deadweightloss
Consumersurplus
Welfare Without Price Discrimination... (Note welfare here is used in an economic context)
Price
0 Quantity
Profit
Demand
Marginal cost
Marginalrevenue
Quantity sold
Monopolyprice
(a) Monopolist with Single Price
Welfare With Price Discrimination...
Price
0 Quantity
Demand
Marginal cost
Quantity sold
(b) Monopolist with Perfect Price Discrimination
Profit
Perfect Price Discrimination
Perfect price discrimination refers to the situation when the monopolist knows exactly the willingness to pay of each consumer and can charge each consumer a different price.
Price Discrimination
Two important effects of price discrimination: It can increase the monopolist’s profits It can reduce deadweight loss
Question Why would a producer have difficulty in
achieving first-degree price discrimination?
Answer
1) Too many customers (impractical)
2) Could not estimate the reservation price for each customer
Additional Profit From Perfect First-Degree Price Discrimination
Price Discrimination
First Degree Price Discrimination The model does demonstrate the potential
profit (incentive) of practicing price discrimination to some degree.
Price Discrimination First Degree Price Discrimination
The following are examples of imperfect price discrimination where the seller has the ability to segregate the market to some extent and charge different prices for the same product:• Lawyers, doctors, accountants
• Car salesperson (15% profit margin)
• Colleges and universities
First-Degree PriceDiscrimination in Practice
Quantity
D
MR
MC
$/Q
P2
P3
P*4
P5
P6
P1
Six prices exist resultingin higher profits. With a single priceP*4, there are fewer consumers and
those who pay P5 or P6 may have a surplus.
Q
Second-Degree Price Discrimination
Quantity
$/Q
D
MR
MC
AC
P0
Q0
Without discrimination: P = P0 and Q = Q0. With second-degree
discrimination there are threeprices P1, P2, and P3.(e.g. electric utilities)
P1
Q1
1st Block
P2
Q2
P3
Q3
2nd Block 3rd Block
Second-degree pricediscrimination is pricing
according to quantityconsumed--or in blocks.
Second-Degree Price Discrimination
Quantity
$/Q
D
MR
MC
AC
P0
Q0
P1
Q1
1st Block
P2
Q2
P3
Q3
2nd Block 3rd Block
Economies of scale permit:•Increase consumer welfare•Higher profits
Note: MC should cross over AC at some point but not here for the purposes of clarity
Price Discrimination
Third Degree Price Discrimination
1) Divides the market into two-groups.
2) Each group has its own demand function.
Price Discrimination
Third Degree Price Discrimination
3) Most common type of pricediscrimination.
• Examples: airlines, discounts to students and senior citizens.
Price Discrimination
Third Degree Price Discrimination
4) Third-degree price discrimination is feasible when the seller can separate his/her market into groups who have different price elasticities of demand (e.g. business air
travelers versus vacation air travelers)
Examples of Price Discrimination
Movie tickets (Tuesdays) Train fares (Peak, off-peak,
concessions, passes) Discount coupons (Elastic demand) Financial aid (Concession cards) Quantity discounts (Small vs large
packaging)
Airline Fares
Differences in elasticities imply that some customers will pay a higher fare than others.
Business travelers have few choices and their demand is less elastic.
Casual travelers have choices and are more price sensitive.
Airlines have two distinct profits which when summed, are greater than if just one price was charged.
MCATC
D:adultsMR:adults
Quantity
Re
ven
ue
an
d C
os
ts (
$)
D:students
MR:students
Q:adults
P:adults
Q:studs
P:studs
Under price discrimination, profit is maximised where MC = MR for each category of customer.
Note: Economy passengers are assumed to have a higher price elasticity of demand because of lower incomes or simply less urgent travel requirements.
Part 3 Intertemporal Part 3 Intertemporal Price Discrimination and Price Discrimination and Peak-Load PricingPeak-Load Pricing
Two related forms of Price Discrimination
Intertemporal Price DiscriminationCharge a high price at first to capture the
consumer surplus of high demand groupLower the price later to capture the mass marketExample: hardcover vs paperback releases
Peak-Load PricingCharge higher price during peak and lower price
during off-peak periodThis is more efficient because MC is higher
during peak periodsExample: Electricity charges
Intertemporal Price Discrimination and Peak-Load Pricing
Separating the Market With Time Initial release of a product, the demand is
inelastic• Book
• Movie
• Computer
Airline Fares
The airlines separate the market by setting various restrictions on the tickets. Less expensive: advance purchase, stay over
the weekend, no refund Most expensive: no restrictions
Separating the Market With Time Once this market has yielded a maximum
profit, firms lower the price to appeal to a general market with a more elastic demand • Paper back books
• Dollar Movies
• Discount computers
Intertemporal PriceDiscrimination and Peak-Load Pricing
Intertemporal Price Discrimination
Quantity
AC = MC
$/Q
Over time, demand becomesmore elastic and price
is reduced to appeal to the mass market.
Q2
MR2
D2 = AR2
P2
D1 = AR1MR1
P1
Q1
Consumers are dividedinto groups over time.
Initially, demand is lesselastic resulting in a
price of P1 .
Demand for some products may peak at particular times. Rush hour traffic Electricity - late summer afternoons Ski resorts on weekends
Intertemporal PriceDiscrimination and Peak-Load Pricing
Peak-Load PricingPeak-Load Pricing
Capacity restraints will also increase MC.
Increased MR and MC would indicate a higher price.
Peak-Load PricingPeak-Load Pricing
Intertemporal PriceDiscrimination and Peak-Load Pricing
MR is not equal for each market because one market does not impact the other market.
Different from 3rd degree p-d . With 3rd degree p-d, MR must be equal for each group of consumers, and equal to MC.
Peak-load pricing: price and sales can be determined independently by setting MC = MR for each period.
Peak-Load PricingPeak-Load Pricing
Intertemporal PriceDiscrimination and Peak-Load Pricing
MR1
D1 = AR1
MC
P1
Q1
Peak-load price = P1 .
Peak-Load Pricing
Quantity
$/Q
MR2
D2 = AR2
Off- load price = P2 .
Q2
P2
Part 4 Two-Part TariffPart 4 Two-Part Tariff
The Two-Part Tariff
The purchase of some products and services can be separated into two decisions, and therefore, two prices.
The Two-Part Tariff
Examples
1) Amusement Park• Pay to enter
• Pay for rides and food within the park
2) Tennis Club• Pay to join
• Pay to play
The Two-Part Tariff Examples
3) Rental of Mainframe Computers• Flat Fee
• Processing Time
4) Polaroid Film• Pay for the camera
• Pay for the film
The Two-Part Tariff
Pricing decision is setting the entry fee (T) and the usage fee (P).
Choosing the trade-off between free-entry and high use prices or high-entry and zero use prices.
Two-Part Tariff Another means of extracting
consumer surplus It is a form of pricing in which
consumers are charged both an entry and a usage fee
The problem is to pick the profit maximising entry fee (T) and usage fee (P) combination
Firm must have some market power
Usage price P*is set whereMC = D. Entry price T* is equal to the entire consumer surplus.
T*
Two-Part Tariff with a Single Consumer
Quantity
$/Q
MCP*
D
Two-Part Tariff (Single Consumer)
D
MC
Quantity
P*
Pri
ce
Usage fee P*=MC
Entry Fee = Consumer Surplus
This is efficient because Price = MC but the firm takes all the consumer surplus
The Two-Part Tariff
The Two-Part Tariff With Many Different Consumers No exact way to determine P* and T*. Must consider the trade-off between the
entry fee T* and the use fee P*.• Low entry fee: High sales and falling profit with
lower price and more entrants.
The Two-Part Tariff
The Two-Part Tariff With Many Different Consumers To find optimum combination, choose
several combinations of P,T. Choose the combination that maximizes
profit.
The Two-Part Tariff
Two-Part Tariff With A Twist Entry price (T) entitles the buyer to a certain
number of free units• Gillette razors with several blades
• Amusement parks with some tokens
• On-line with free time
Pricing Cellular Phone Service
QuestionWhy do cellular (i.e. mobile) phone
providers offer several different plans instead of a single two-part tariff with an access fee and per-unit charge?
It allows suppliers to combine 3rd degree price discrimination with
the two-part tariff. Consumers sort themselves into groups on the basis
of which plan they want. These different groups have different
elasticities of demand.
Part 5 BundlingPart 5 Bundling
Bundling
Bundling is practice of selling multiple products in a package
Aimed at extracting maximum consumer surplus
Bundling can be: Pure: Practice of selling products only as a package.
Mixed: Practice of selling two or more goods both as a package and individually.
Bundling
Bundling in Practice Automobile option packages Vacation travel Cable television
Examples of Mixed Bundling
McDonalds (Value meals) Accommodation bundled with
meals Clothing (shirt bundled with tie) Microsoft products (e.g. you can
buy Word separately or choose a bundle)
Bundling
Mixed Bundling in Practice Use of market surveys to determine reservation
prices Design a pricing strategy from the survey results
Mixed bundling allows the customer to get maximum utility from a given expenditure by allowing a greater number of choices.
Bundling
Tying Practice of requiring a customer to purchase
one good in order to purchase another. Examples• Xerox machines and the paper
• IBM mainframe and computer cards
• Mobil may require its service stations to sell only Mobil Oil
BUNDLING
Suppose the marginal cost is zero. Then equating marginal revenue and marginal cost means that revenue maximization is the same as profit maximization.
If the channels are sold separately, the most the firm, Cox Cable, could get for the channels would be the sum of the prices each segment was willing to pay.
Part 6 Part 6 Mark-up pricingMark-up pricing
Mark-up or cost-plus pricing
Percentage contribution margin( PCM): PCM = (Price-Marginal Cost)/ PricePCM= 1/ elasticity
%markup profit margin; desired rate of return on investment
Inelastic demand higher markup
Elastic demand lower markup
Part 7 SummaryPart 7 Summary
Summary
Firms with market power are in an enviable position because they have the potential to earn large profits, but realizing that potential may depend critically on the firm’s pricing strategy.
A pricing strategy aims to enlarge the customer base that the firm can sell to, and capture as much consumer surplus as possible.
Summary
Ideally, the firm would like to perfectly price discriminate.
The two-part tariff is another means of capturing consumer surplus.
Bundling can increase profits.
In-class revision exercises
What do you understand by 3rd degree price discrimination?
Two or more customer groups with different price elasticities – and therefore different demand curves - are charged different prices. These groups can be distinguished such as with concession passes (e.g. working people and pensioners), or eagerness or reluctance to pay a higher price (e.g. holiday travelers and business class travelers.). Use diagram. Can also draw a simpler diagram, assuming constant ATC and MC.
Discuss three different pricing strategies that an airline may use.
Airlines use an array of different pricing strategies, often simultaneously. These include:
third degree price discrimination (e.g. holiday travelers and business travelers);
peak load pricing when elasticities are lower, demand is higher, and running costs are higher due to capacity constraints (e.g. Sydney airport on Monday morning);
intertemporal pricing (e.g. advanced bookings are cheaper because the consumer is more flexible with schedules and likely to be more price sensitive, whereas if the consumer desperately needs to fly to a destination the next day, then demand is less elastic and be more willing to pay a higher price);
bundling (e.g. if you book hotel accommodation, multiple flight destinations and car hire, then each flight is relatively cheaper than if you just booked a single flight);
marginal cost pricing (e.g. as take-off time approaches, seats that remain empty, after the other pricing strategies have been exhausted, are sold off at ‘rock- bottom’ prices as the mc of each extra passenger is very low. Better to have seats at $50 than empty seats).
There are other strategies such as two part tariffs (e.g. frequent flyers club members pay a joining fee but then each flight [i.e. usage] is cheaper).
The objective of airline companies has been to discriminate more finely among travelers with different reservation prices. Over the past decade, Internet booking patterns and ‘data mining’ is making this easier for airlines than previously.
As one industry executive put it: “ You don’t want to sell a seat to a guy for $69 when he is willing to pay $400. At the same time, you would rather sell a seat for $69 than leave it empty” (cited Pindyck and Rubinfeld 2005: 393).
The End