Lecture 4 Bioactivity Testing and Clinical Studies
-
Upload
james-perianayagam -
Category
Documents
-
view
6 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Lecture 4 Bioactivity Testing and Clinical Studies
Bioassays and clinical studies
Oliver Kayser
Types of Assays
• Chemical Assays: Spectrophotometry, Spectrofluorimetry, Chromatography,
• Immunoassays
• Microbiological assays
Definition
– Estimation of the conc / potency of a substance by measuring its biological response in living systems
– i.e.Observation of pharmacological effects on
[1] living tissues, or cells (in vitro)
[2] microorganisms
[3] animals (in vivo)
Indications for Bioassay• Active principle of drug is unknown• Active principale cannot be isolated, e.g. insulin,
posterior pituitary extract etc. • Chemical method is either
– not available – if available, too complex, – insensitive to low doses e.g. Histamine can be bioassayed in
microgram conc. • Unknown Chemical composition, e.g. long acting
thyroid stimulator. • Chemical composition of drug variable but has same
pharmacological action e.g. cardiac glycosides isolated from diff sources, catecholamines etc.
Principles of Bioassay• Active principle to be assayed should show the same
measured response in all animal species• The degree of pharmacological response produced
should be reproducible under identical conditions [Eg Adrenaline shows same rise in BP in the same species under identical conditions: wt, age, sex, strain / breed etc]
• The reference standard must owe its activity to the principle for which the sample is being bioassayed
• Activity assayed should be the activity of interest• Individual variations must be minimised / accounted
for• Bioassay might measure a diff aspect of the same
substance compared to chemical assay [Eg testosterone & metabolites
Types of Bioassays[1] Quantal Assays [ Direct endpoint ]
– Elicits an ‘All or None’ response in different animals
– Eg. • Digitalis induced cardiac arrest in guinea pigs• hypoglycemic convulsions in mice. • Digitalis induced head drop in rabbits• Calculation of LD50 in mice or rats
[2] Graded Response Assays [mostly on tissues]– Graded responses to varying doses– Unknown dose response measured on same tissue
Methods of Bioassay con1[2] Graded Response Assays [ Direct comparison on same tissues]– Interpolation: Conc. of unknown is read from a standard plot of a log dose response curve of at least 4 sub maximal concentrations
– Matching / Bracketing: Const dose bracketed with varying doses of standard till exact match is obtained
• Used when test sample is too small
• Inaccurate & margin of error difficult to estimate• Eg histamine on guinea pig ileum, Posterior pituitary on rat uterus
– Multiple Point Assays• 3 point assay [combines pples of matching with interpolation]
• 4 point assay [combines pples of matching with interpolation]
3 point assay [2+1 dose assay]• Fast & convenient• Procedure [Eg Ach bioassay]
– Log dose response [LDR] curve plotted with varying conc of std Ach solutions and given test solution
– Select two std doses s1& s2 [ in 1:2 dose ratio] from linear part of LDR [ Let the corresponding response be S1, S2]
– Choose a test dose t with a response T between S1 & S2 – Record 4 sets data [Latin square: Randomisation reduces
error] as follows• s1 s2 t• t s1 s2• s2 t s1• s1 s2 t
– Plot mean of S1, S2 and T against dose. Calculate – Log Potency ratio [ M ] = [ (T –S1) / (S2‐S1) ] X log d
[d = dose ratio]
4 point assay [2 +2 dose assay]• Procedure [Eg Ach bioassay]
– Log dose response [LDR] curve plotted with varying conc of std Ach solutions and given test solution
– Select two std doses s1& s2 from linear part of LDR [ Let the corresponding response be S1, S2]
– Choose two test doses t1 & t2 with response T1 &T2 between S1 & S2 ; Also s2/s1 = t2/t1 = 2
– Record 4 data sets [Latin square: Randomisation reduces error]• s1 s2 t1 t2• s2 t1 t2 s1• t1 t2 s1 s2• t2 s1 s2 t1
– Plot mean of S1, S2 and T1, T2 against dose. Calculate – Log Potency ratio [M] = [ (T1 –S1 + T2 –S2) / (S2‐S1 + T2‐T1) ] X
log d [d = dose ratio]
HTPA
• Expensiv e and time consuming
• Example:– 1 plant = 3 years analysis
– Automatisation is needed
• How to screen plants?
College 1/1 ‐ 11
Drug discovery and lead discovery
• Lead or lead compound
• A lead is a compound with pharmacological options for further developments
• Nature is most valuable source for drug leads
Zie ook G. Thomas, Medicinal Chemistry, chapter 5.6
HTPA
College 1/1 ‐ 13
Mega HPLC
Puffer
organischesLösungsmittel
Wasser
... usw.10 SPE-Säulen
Desorption vonden SPE-Säulen
zum Abfall
zum Fraktionen-sammler
AufgabesäuleHaupttrennsäulefür Trennschritt I
... usw.18 SPE-Säulen
Trennschritt IImit 6 Trennsäulen
zur Auswahl
Wasser
College 1/1 ‐ 14
Bioguided fractionation of Retama sphaerocarpa
Bioguided Fractionation
Zie ook G. Thomas, Medicinal Chemistry, chapter 6.3
Dereplication
College 1/1 ‐ 16
Dereplication is the use of chemical methods and bioanalytical techniques for the discrimination of already known compunds in extracts ver y importantThese techniques could be:
‐ NMR‐Massa‐ UV
All technical reporting systems are coupled tonatural product libaries Zie ook G. Thomas, Medicinal Chemistry, chapter 5.6
HTPS
• HTPS = How to find a needle in a hairstack
• Principal: To screen the sample completly in time
• Need of bioinformatic suuport necessary
Why perform High Throughput Screening?
HTS enables the testing of large numbers of chemicalsubstances for activity in diverse areas of biology ina relatively short time.
The entire chemical space of small organic molecules isestimated to be > 1060. Of those, ~ 2.7 x 107 compoundshave been registered and made. (Nature Insight, 2004)
Responses studied can range from biochemicalsystems of purified proteins or enzymes to signaltransduction pathways to complex cellular networks(Systems Biology).
How Does One Select a Library to Screen?
Random SelectionRandom high throughput screeningLittle is known about the targetFew or no active compounds as guides
Computational Chemistry/Virtual ScreeningCreation of ‘Focused Libraries’Requires prior knowledge about target
Active compounds, 3D‐StructureSequence homology
Prior ExperienceLibrary successfully used for similar
or related targets
Stages of Commercial Drug Development
Drug Development is a game of attrition. The Challenge … Select 1‐2 compounds from the millions of possibilities that will be safe and efficacious in humans
Basic ResearchBasic Research Target ValidationTarget Validation HTS and Lead IdHTS and Lead Id Lead OptLead Opt
Preclinical ToxPreclinical Tox File IND File IND Clinical Phase 0/1Clinical Phase 0/1 Clinical Phase 2Clinical Phase 2
Clinical Phase 3Clinical Phase 3 File NDAFile NDA ApprovalApproval Sales Marketing Phase 4
Sales Marketing Phase 4
Stages of Academic Drug Development
Still a game of attrition. The Challenge …Identify agents that increase the fundamental scientific knowledgefor a particular target with the possibility of providing further validationof the target as a ‘druggable’ target.
Retain the possibility of identifying a lead series of compoundsthat could take our research in new, unexpected directions.
The possibility of establishing intellectual property and the basis for afuture pharmaceutical.
Basic ResearchBasic Research HTS and Lead IdHTS and Lead Id Lead OptLead Opt
The Screening Continuum
Fa. Robocon
Working with samples
Zie ook G. Thomas, Medicinal Chemistry, chapter 5.7
Parameter Traditional Assay HTS AssayProtocol Complex, numerous steps
•Multiple Additions•Multiple Aspirations•Multiple Washes
Simple, few steps (3-5)•Additions•Aspirations - discouraged•Washes - discouraged
Parameter Traditional Assay HTS AssayProtocol Complex, numerous steps
•Multiple Additions•Multiple Aspirations•Multiple Washes
Simple, few steps (3-5)•Additions•Aspirations - discouraged•Washes - discouraged
Assay Container VariedTubes/slides/dishes/cuvettes/animals
Microtiter plates96/384/1536-Wells
Parameter Traditional Assay HTS AssayProtocol Complex, numerous steps
•Multiple Additions•Multiple Aspirations•Multiple Washes
Simple, few steps (3-5)•Additions•Aspirations - discouraged•Washes - discouraged
Assay Container VariedTubes/slides/dishes/cuvettes/animals
Microtiter plates96/384/1536-Wells
Assay Volume 0.1 to 1 mL < 1 μl to 100 μl
Parameter Traditional Assay HTS AssayProtocol Complex, numerous steps
•Multiple Additions•Multiple Aspirations•Multiple Washes
Simple, few steps (3-5)•Additions•Aspirations - discouraged•Washes - discouraged
Assay Container VariedTubes/slides/dishes/cuvettes/animals
Microtiter plates96/384/1536-Wells
Assay Volume 0.1 to 1 mL < 1 μl to 100 μlReagents Varied
•Limited quantity•Various batches•Limited stability
Consistent•QS for complete screen•Single batch - preferred•Prolonged stability
Parameter Traditional Assay HTS AssayProtocol Complex, numerous steps
•Multiple Additions•Multiple Aspirations•Multiple Washes
Simple, few steps (3-5)•Additions•Aspirations - discouraged•Washes - discouraged
Assay Container VariedTubes/slides/dishes/cuvettes/animals
Microtiter plates96/384/1536-Wells
Assay Volume 0.1 to 1 mL < 1 μl to 100 μlReagents Varied
•Limited quantity•Various batches•Limited stability
Consistent•QS for complete screen•Single batch - preferred•Prolonged stability
Variables Many•Time/temperature•Ligand/substrate concentration•Cell type
Compound
Parameter Traditional Assay HTS AssayProtocol Complex, numerous steps
•Multiple Additions•Multiple Aspirations•Multiple Washes
Simple, few steps (3-5)•Additions•Aspirations - discouraged•Washes - discouraged
Assay Container VariedTubes/slides/dishes/cuvettes/animals
Microtiter plates96/384/1536-Wells
Assay Volume 0.1 to 1 mL < 1 μl to 100 μlReagents Varied
•Limited quantity•Various batches•Limited stability
Consistent•QS for complete screen•Single batch - preferred•Prolonged stability
Variables Many•Time/temperature•Ligand/substrate concentration•Cell type
Compound
Readout Time Milliseconds to months Minutes to hours
Parameter Traditional Assay HTS AssayProtocol Complex, numerous steps
•Multiple Additions•Multiple Aspirations•Multiple Washes
Simple, few steps (3-5)•Additions•Aspirations - discouraged•Washes - discouraged
Assay Container VariedTubes/slides/dishes/cuvettes/animals
Microtiter plates96/384/1536-Wells
Assay Volume 0.1 to 1 mL < 1 μl to 100 μlReagents Varied
•Limited quantity•Various batches•Limited stability
Consistent•QS for complete screen•Single batch - preferred•Prolonged stability
Variables Many•Time/temperature•Ligand/substrate concentration•Cell type
Compound
Readout Time Milliseconds to months Minutes to hoursOutput Formats Varied
Readers/scoring/image interpretation
Plate readerAbsorbance/fluorescence/luminescence
Compare Traditional Assays with HTS AssaysParameter Traditional Assay HTS Assay
Critical Issues to be Addressed Prior to Testing the First Compound
Key factors that must be addressed prior to screening:
• Assay protocol (miniaturization/simplification)
• DMSO resistance (test 0.1 ‐ 5%), standard compound vehicle
• Reagent quantity and batch consistency
• Reagent stability for storage and use under assay conditions
• Appropriate positive and negative controls
• Assay reproducibility and signal stability
• Available secondary or counter screen to test target
specificity and selectivity
HTSScreen
Time
CostsQuality
time/wellwells/dayscreens/yearproject time
reagentsconsumablesinstrumentationpersonnel
few false positivesfew false negativesS:N,SW,z’‐FactorValidated ‘Hits’
Key factors for successful HTS
College 1 ‐ 28
Why is High Troughput so important?
• Economic reasons– Patent time (20 years)
– Long time for drug development (10‐12 years)
– Increased productivity
Test system Manual monster preparation/d robotic monster preparation/d
Enzyme inhibitor 60-80 3000Receptor binding 300 1600Celcultures 1000 4800
Samle Costs (in €)
96er Mikrotiterplateper samplefor 500 000 monster
0,83415,000
384er Mikrotiterplaatper samplefor 500 000 monster
0,1680,000
1536er Mikrotiterplaatper sample for 500 000 monster
0,0315,000
Consider: Reagent QuantityCompare traditional assays with HTS assays
Traditional Assay 96-Well HTS 384-Well HTS
Plates/Day 1 40 40
Total Plates 5 375 94
Cells/Day 1 x 106 40 x 106 40 x 106
Total Cells 5 x 106 375 x 106 94 x 106
Total Assay Volume (μL)
100 100 25
μL/Well User purifiedreagent
10 10 2.5
mL Purified rgt/plate 1 1 1
mL Total purified rgt 5 375 94
30,000 Compounds Traditional Assay 96-Well HTS
Plates/Day 1 40
Total Plates 5 375
Cells/Day 1 x 106 40 x 106
Total Cells 5 x 106 375 x 106
Total Assay Volume (μL)
100 100
μL/Well User purifiedreagent
10 10
mL Purified rgt/plate 1 1
mL Total purified rgt 5 375
Traditional Assay
Plates/Day 1
Total Plates 5
Cells/Day 1 x 106
Total Cells 5 x 106
Total Assay Volume (μL)
100
μL/Well User purifiedreagent
10
mL Purified rgt/plate 1
mL Total purified rgt 5
HTS: An Iterative Process
HTS GroupSecondary ScreenPurpose: Validate initial ‘Hits’Method: Selection of compoundsor medicinal chemistry
Chemistry groupsAnalysis and interpretation of Data for
Structure Activity RelationshipsRefine and improve identified ‘Hits’
Modeling and medicinal chemistrySelection of compounds for screening via
virtual screening, focused libraries
HTS GroupPerform Primary ScreenPurpose: Identify a starting placeMethod: Interrogate libraries of
compounds/genes
Research groupsTarget Id and ValidationDevelop Primary and Secondary assaysDefine criteria for active compoundsDirect ‘Hit’ improvement process
Natural drugs ?
• More and more important:– Fytotherapy
– Homeopathy
– Alternative treatment
• More than 120 therapies are known!
Use of medicinal plants
• Ca. 80% of world population are dependned on plants as drugs
• Synthetic drugs mostly too expensive
• Deeply depended on cultural background
• WHO consideres plant based therapy as essential part in public health systems and acess to therapies
Pharmacolocical active constitutens
• Some plants contain known pharmacolocigal active constitutens, most plant constituents are unknown
• If possible use synthetic compounds where actions and side effects are known
• Mostly distinct parts of the plants are used (roots, leaves, seeds)
• Biosynthesis should be nown to characterise the plant of use
Ethnobotanie ‐ Ethnofarmacie
• Research to understand traditional use of plants
• Artemisinine ‐ Anti‐malaria
• Podofyllotoxine ‐ Anti‐cancer
• Paclitaxel ‐ Anti‐cancer
College 1/1 ‐ 37
From Artemisinin to Artemether
R = OH dihydroartemisinR = CH3 artemetherR = CH2CH3 arteetherR = COCH2CH2COONa artesunate
O
O
HOO
HH
H
OR
HO
O
HOO
O
HH
H
H
From Podophyllotoxin to Wartec
Podophyllum hexandrum
H3CO OCH3
OCH3
O
O
OH
O
O
Podophyllotoxin
Chemotaxonomy
• Each step in the biosynthetic rout is catalysed by one enzyme
• One enzyme = one gene
• Closly related species can produce similar or the same constitutent
ca. 35.000 genes known =
35.000 natural products in one organism !?
Chemotaxonomie
O
MeO
MeO
OH
OMe
O
O
MeO
MeO
OMe
OMe
O
Arctigenin
Dimethylmatairesinol
O
MeO
HO
OH
OMe
O
O
OH
OMe
OO
O
O
OH
OMe
OO
O
OH
OMe
OHO
MeO
OO
MeO
HO
OH
OMe
O
OH
O
OH
OMe
OO
O
OH
O
OO
O
OO
O
OO
O
OMe
OMe
O
OO
O
OH
OMeMeO
Matairesinol
Hinokinin7'-Hydroxymatairesinol
4'Demethylyatein
Chemotaxonomie
DifferentMentha varieties
Ecology
Why produces...
Taxus brevifolia paclitaxel?
Penicillium penicillin?
Cannabis sativa THC?
Streptomyces doxorubicin?
OO
NH OH
HO
O
O
OH
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OH
COH2
A plant does it not for us !
Chemical ecology
‐ Communication
‐ attracting insects
‐ Against prediators
‐ Defending against other microorganisms (chemisch oorlog)
‐ Protecting against radiation (e.g. UV)
Chemical ecology
Juglans regens
Inhibition, allelopathic effekt
Hydrojuglon‐β‐glucosid Hydrojuglon Juglon(niot active ) (actiive)
Chemical ecology
‐ Tropisch regenwouden
‐ Coral reef
‐ South Africa
‐ Ecological niches
Where can we benefit from?
Biodiversity