Leann Dreher Graduate Portfolio

81
LEANN DREHER PORTFOLIO

description

Master of Architecture Portfolio University of Michigan 2012

Transcript of Leann Dreher Graduate Portfolio

  • LEANN DREHER

    PORTFOLIO

  • MASTER OF ARCHITECTURETAUBMAN COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN PLANNING

    UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 2012

    LEANN DREHER

  • 1CONTENTS:

    PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLIC SPACE

    2NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY HEADQUARTERS3PAPER ARCH

    6THESIS: FABRICATED DISTANCE54

    7

    PARAMETRIC SCREEN

    BIOFUEL PRODUCTION

    PROFESSIONAL

  • 1PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLIC SPACENEW YORK, NY

    This studio will bring forward the taxonomy of the performative tactics of existing corporate architecture to develop the strategies for a new Architecture of the Corporation that is an agent for new kinds of collaboration and cohabitation in the city. The goal of the studio is to investigate the possibility of architecture that is the catalyst for the coexistence of the market and the civic, the articulated and productive interface between the ideals of the city and the means that support it, and generate a projection for an urban infrastructure against the obsolete or irrelevant (non)cities of the future.

    Through research of Privately Owned Public Space (POPS) in New York City, this project sought to develop and design a new POPS system within the city. Using Hudson Yards as a case study, this system was deployed across the development. By connecting and programming each space to have a different function, and creating a brand identity to make the spaces easily recognizable, the new POPS system aims to become a vital part of the development and attract users from across the city with its varied and diverse programming.

    PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES:

    PROJECT DESIGN:

  • MANHATTAN POPS

    ARCADE

    PLAZA

    THROUGH BLOCK ARCADE

    MULTIPLE

    ENCLOSED PUBLIC SPACE

    PUBLIC OPEN SPACE/PARK

    THROUGH BLOCK GALLARIA

    SIDEWALK WIDENING

  • MANHATTAN SUBWAYS

  • covered public space

    uncovered public space

    building

    EXISTING CONDITIONS

    parkland

  • OPEN AIR CONCOURSE COVERED PEDESTRIAN SPACE THROUGH BLOCK ARCADE ELEVATED PLAZA

    PLAZA ARCADE URBAN PLAZA SIDEWALK WIDENING

  • PROJECT SITE

    30th ST

    31st ST

    32nd ST

    34th ST

    35th ST

    36th ST

    37th ST

    38th ST

    39th ST

    40th ST

    41st ST

    42nd ST11

    th A

    VE

    10th

    AVE

    9th

    AVE

    8th

    AVE

    HUDSON RIVER

    42nd ST

  • [A]

    [B]

    [C]

    [UNFOLDED SECTION]

    PROJECT SITE: HUDSON YARDS

  • POPS AXONOMETRIC

  • articulated facade that differs from original structure

    articulated facadethat differs fromoriginal structure

    articulated facade that differs from original structure

    creates a recognizableidentity for publicspace that can be seenfrom a distance

    creates a recognizableidentity for publicspace that can be seenfrom a distance

    creates a recognizableidentity for publicspace that can be seenfrom a distance

    projects from thestructure to increasevisibility

    creates views acrossthe city

    BASE DESIGN PROJECTION

    BUILDING TOP CONNECTION

    articulated facade that differs from original structure

    creates a recognizableidentity for publicspace that can be seenfrom a distance

    enlarges usable floorarea

    enlarges usable floorarea

    projects from thestructure to increasevisibility

    NEW POPS TYPOLOGY

  • [B] MAIN ENTRANCE

    [C] HIGHLINE CONNECTION

  • [A] READING CORRIDOR

    READING SPACES

  • PARTIAL UNFOLDED SECTION

    racquetball

    basketball

    yoga

    artists spaces

    racquetball

    running track

    meeting space

    swimming pool

    running track

    chess/checkers

  • dance studios

    batting cages

    running track

    artists spaces

    grill/barbecue

    subway

    boulderingfield hockey

    community garden

    artists spaces

    reading spaces

    soccer

  • 2NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY HEADQUARTERSCAVE CITY, KY

    To locate a site, create a program, and design a new headquarters for the National Speleological Society. This project should take into consideration the goals of the group, including visibility, current member needs and membership growth, as well as budget. At the end of the semester, the research compiled by the studio, as well as the individual projects will be sent to the NSS for their use.

    The new headquarters design was located in Cave City, Kentucky, near the Mammoth Caves, and in the heart of the caving culture. The design incorporates a museum, archives, sleeping quarters, and a meeting room to allow the building to function in all necessary capacities, while remaining small in size to accommodate the modest budget of the NSS.

    PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES:

    PROJECT DESIGN:

  • SITE PLAN

  • FLOOR PLAN

    1 ENTRY2 MUSEUM3 MULTIPURPOSE ROOM4 KITCHEN5 ARCHIVE6 LIBRARY7 BOOK DISTRIBUTION8 OFFICE SUPPLY9 OFFICE10 BUNK ROOM11 LOCKER ROOM12 STORAGE13 VERTICAL TRAINING14 24 HR ACCESS15 OUTDOOR TRAINING AREA16 PATIO

    BUILDING KEY

    9

    9

    9

    98

    7

    6

    5

    43

    13

    15

    16

    1

    2

    A

    B

    A

    B

  • NORTHEAST ELEVATION

    SECTION A

    SECTION B

  • CANTILEVER SECTIONVERTICAL TRAINING SECTION

    OUTDOOR TRAINING

  • LATTICEWORK ENTRANCE

  • 3PAPER ARCH

    This project explored, through the production of a freestanding arch, the various ways in which complex assemblies are drawn, described and fabricated, with comprehensive directions for final assembly. Each team selected an assembly system, made up of a limited number of varied and related units, to examine communication techniques of diagramming 2D + 3D and production of coordinated sets of directions for making and assembly.

    Together with my partner, Minghue Huang, we researched, designed and constructed a full scale arch out of Bristol paper, to a height sufficient for the professor (5-7) to walk under freely. The arch was composed solely of the designed units, with no separate connection pieces or adhesive. Drawings were out together as an instruction manual, describing through drawing, the method of assembly to construct the arch in full.

    PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES:

    PROJECT DESIGN:

  • 90

    2STEP1 STEP

    STEP3 STEP4

    STEP5 STEP6

    STEP7

    FINISHED MODULE

    MAKE FOLD ALONG DOTTED LINEMAKE REVERSE FOLD ALONG DOTTED LINEFOLD IN DIRECTION OF ARROW

    MODULE ASSEMBLY

    90

    90

    90

    90

  • STEP1

    +

    MODULE AGGREGATION

    ORDER OF ASSEMBLY

    STEP2

    STEP3

    STEP4

    STEP8STEP7STEP6STEP5

    STEP2STEP1

    MODULE

    MODULE

    STEP4

  • STEP1 STEP2 STEP3

    STEP3STEP2STEP1

    MODULE

    AGGREGATION A

    AGGREGATION B

  • PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES:

    The intention of this exercise is to begin to explore techniques and logics of variable assemblies through iterative research methods that integrate parametric and scripted computation strategies and scale model fabrications. Explorations should follow an iterative process through a series of intense and focused explorations of specific material(s)/method(s).

    PROJECT DESIGN:

    This surface is derived from strips of paper that are folded and joined in a series of simple operations to produce a larger unit; these larger units then aggregate to form a surface. These operations create surface that act as a screen, with the units aggregating along a curving surface, the length and dimensions of each strip change in accordance to its position in the structure. To allow the unit to aggregate along the curving the surface, the script offsets from a selected surface, and the projects normal to that surface a specified distance to form each unit. To affect the depth of the unit, an attractor point, changes the depth of the unit based on its distance from the attractor point.

    4PARAMETRIC SCREEN

  • 5BIOFUEL PRODUCTION

    Each group will prepare and produce an illustrated narrative text that frames, links, explains, expands, etc. the stories of the particular industrial sector they have been examining within the Great Lakes Mega-Region.

    Together with Sheri Zon, our research analyses the production of the two leading biofuels in the Great Lakes Mega-region: corn-based ethanol and biodiesel made from soy. The support of biofuel through government incentives, laws and regulations, and programs for ethanol and biodiesel production in the last decade is a response to environmental concerns and the United States ever-increasing consumption of non-domestic fossil fuels. This analysis examines what is driving the biofuel industry, the inputs/outputs/byproducts/volumes of its production, the expanse of its distribution, its impacts on connected markets, and its potential for continued growth in the Great Lakes Mega-region.

    PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES:

    PROJECT DESIGN:

  • JAMAICA19,584,358

    CANADANETHERLANDS

    UK

    INDIACHINA

    AUSTRALIA

    INDONESIA

    THAILAND

    TURKEY

    S. KOREA

    UAE

    BRAZIL

    1,644,6411,019,014

    18,175,319

    275,068

    395,220

    2,528,697

    506,475217,536

    23,053,168

    30,218,427

    18,474,904 20,461,205

    8,053,812

    IRELAND

    VIETNAM431,133

    291,364

    252,080

    JAPANUNITED STATES

    MEXICO

    1,021,185

    CORN RECEIVING

    ELECTRICITYGASOLINE/DIESEL ELECTRICITY ELECTRICITY

    fine milled corn

    corn slurry

    STEAM

    CORN STORAGE HAMMER MILL CONVEYOR BELT SLURRY TANK JET COOKER1 2 3 4 5 6

    emissions

    corn

    enzymes

    BIOFUEL TRADE

  • 1 BARGE630,000 GALLONS ETHANOL1,500 TONS DDGS

    1 BARGE 15 JUMBO HOPPER CARS 58 LARGE SEMIS

    1 JUMBO HOPPER CAR29,400 GALLONS ETHANOL100 TONS DDGS

    1 LARGE SEMI8,000 GALLONS ETHANOL25 TONS DDGS

    10% 60% 30%

    = =

    wastewater

    wet distiller grains (WDG)

    200 proof ethanol

    emissions

    ELECTRICITY STEAM GASOLINE/DIESEL

    zeolite absorbants

    R COOLING TANK FERMENTOR DISTILLATION PROCESS

    MOLECULAR SIEVE

    ETHANOL STORAGE

    ETHANOL TRANSPORT

    7 8 9 10 11 12

    wastewater

    emissions

    GASOLINE/DIESELHEAT

    WDG HIGH INTENSIVE DRYER

    DDGS TRANSPORT

    1413

    HEAT

    yeasturea (nitrogen source)

    95% ethanol

    corn slurry

    carbon dioxidewater

    ethanol

    5% water

    BIOFUEL TRANSPORT

    ETHANOL PRODUCTION

  • > 139

    91 - 139

    45.5 - 91

    5 - 45.5

    FLEX FUEL VEHICLE DENSITY BY COUNTY: vehicles per square mile

  • ETHANOL REFINERY

    ETHANOL REFINERY

    (unknown capacity)

    (diameter scaled to annual production: 1 = 50,000,000 gal.)

  • CORN YIELD BY COUNTY: bushels per acre 175 +

    150 - 174.9

    125 - 149.9

    100 - 124.9

    74.9 - 99.9

    < 75

  • inputs per 1,000 kg of biodiesel oil from soybeansradius = relative cost of material

    soybeans (68.37%)electricity (6.11%)

    steam (11.83%)stainless steel (1.38%)

    steel (2.16%)cement (0.93%)

    clean-up water (1.4%)space heat (1.33%)direct heat (3.86%)

    losses (2.63%)

    diesel (11.8%)gasoline (7.21%)

    LP gas (0.67%)

    phosphorus (4.16%)potassium (1.28%)lime (36%)seeds (14.79%)herbicides (3.47%)electricity (0.77%)

    machinery (9.61%)labor (7.58%)

    transport (1.07%)

    energy inputs per hectareradius = relative cost of material

    costs ($) / kcal*1000

    1.155

    0

    costs ($) / kcal*1000

    .18

    0

    nitrogen (1.58%)

  • > 139

    91 - 139

    45.5 - 91

    5 - 45.5

    DIESEL VEHICLE DENSITY BY COUNTY: vehicles per square mile

  • SOY BIODIESEL PRODUCTION FACILITY(annual production capacity unknown)

    SOY BIODIESEL REFINERY(diameter scaled to annual production: 1 = 50,000,000 gal.)

    OTHER BIODIESEL PRODUCTION FACILITY(annual production capacity unknown)

    OTHER BIODIESEL REFINERY(diameter scaled to annual production: 1 = 50,000,000 gal.)

  • SOYBEAN YIELD BY COUNTY: bushels per acre> 50

    45 - 49.9

    40 - 44.9

    35 - 39.9

    30 - 34.9

    < 30

  • diesel (12.36%)gasoline (4.99%)nitrogen (30.17%)phosphorus (3.33%)potassium (3.09%)lime (3.88%)seeds (6.41%)

    irrigation (3.94%)

    herbicides (7.64%)

    insecticides (3.45%)

    machinery (12.54%)labor (5.69%)

    electricity (0.42%)

    energy inputs per hectareradius = relative cost of material

    costs ($) / kcal*1000

    .38

    0

    transport (2.08%)

    inputs per 1,000 kg of biodiesel oil from soybeansradius = relative cost of material

    corn grain (38.21%)

    corn transport (4.88%)water (1.36%)

    stainless steel (0.18%)steel (0.18%)

    cement (0.44%)

    steam (138.9%)electricity (15.32%)

    95% ethanol to 99.5% (.14%)sewage effluent (1.0%)

    costs ($) / kcal*1000

    1.33

    0

  • This thesis will focus upon ways through which architecture converts abstract cultural notions about the world into physical forms that engender them with the characteristics of real things. It will examine different ways that belief becomes inscribed in spatial orderings, and explore architectures role in smoothing over apparent contradictions between the concepts with which we define the physical world and the way we experience it through our senses. This thesis will call into question the terms and techniques with which architecture embodies and communicates different views, values, and cultural mythologies and it will experiment with techniques for making things that adhere to contradictory types of conceptual and visual logic simultaneously.

    This thesis explores the ways in which perceptions of distance can be manipulated, and works to simultaneously exaggerate and collapse ones sense of distance within a single spatial envelope. Through investigations into physical, visual, material and experiential means of spatial manipulation, such as the international dateline, geographical mapping techniques, and cultural borders, this work creates two simultaneous perceptions of reality that interact with, and are cognizant of each other.

    6THESIS: FABRICATED DISTANCE

    PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES:

    PROJECT DESIGN:

  • HORIZON

  • COAST

    DEEP WATER

  • CHASM DISTANT PEAKS

  • FOREST

  • HORIZON

  • LAWN

  • DISTANT PEAKS

  • PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

    Following are selected drawings from my work at Daniels and Zermack Associates, Inc., an architecture firm specializing in banks, credit unions and savings and loan facilities. While working there I have had the opportunity to work on projects at all stages of the design process, from preliminary site design to construction administration to shop drawings, and all areas in between.

    7PROFESSIONAL WORK

  • FLOOR PLANNORTH

  • 2C1.1

    3C1.2

    3C1.2

    5

    3

    4

    1

    3

    3

    5

    SIM

    1

    METAL CABINET BYB.E. SUPPLIER

    COUNTER PLAN1C1.1

    111

    1

    3333355555555 4

    444

    7 16 25 325 16 3 16 25 25 16 3

    75

    21

    92

    1

    21 21 212

    AC1.1

    88

    46

    1C1.2

    6C1.2

    1 2C1.2

    BC1.1

    18

    12

    62

    1/2

  • BACK OF COUNTER ELEVATIONAC1.1

    3C1.2

    3C1.2

    1C1.2

    3

    3

    4

    5

    1

    3

    3

    3

    4

    53

    31 4

    5

    1

    3

    3

    METAL CABINET BYB.E. SUPPLIER

    METAL CABINET BYB.E. SUPPLIER

    EDGE OF CABINET

    SLIDING PANEL (TYP) 3

    BACKSPLASH ON WALL

    EC1.11

    1

    212

    44

    3C1.2

    5C1.2

    630

  • SECTION AT WINDOWHA1.1

    71/

    4 EQ EQ

    1/4 TEMP CLEAR GLASS

    1/2 X 1 1/4 WD STOP W/ROUNDED EDGES TOMATCH EXIST.3/4 X 4 7/8 WD FRAME

    3/4 WD TRIM

    3 SOUND BATT INSUL

    5/8 GYP BD ON 3 5/8METAL STUDS

    5 NOM

    BULKHEAD

    EXIST CEILING

    FINISH FLOOR

    12-

    3

    EA6.1

    18 19 20 21G

    A6.1

    FA6.1

    1A9.1

    INTERIOR ELEVATIONBA1.1

    EXIST CEILING

    FINISH FLOOR

    CA6.1

    DA6.1 SIM NEW TRIMS

    NEW CHAIR RAILNEW WD BASEBOARD

    MATCH TRIMHEIGHTS TO EXIST

    WOOD FILLER STRIPCOPE AROUND EXISTTRIM & SEAL

    GLASS SEAM1/4 GLASS PANEL

    BULKHEAD BEYOND

    CA6.1 2

    A9.1

    12-

    3

  • 1/4 GLASS1/2 X 1 1/4 WD STOPW/ ROUNDED EDGESTO MATCH EXIST.3/4 X 4 7/8 WDFRAME

    5/8 PLYWOOD

    3/4 WD TRIM

    3/4 X 4 7/8 WDFRAME1/2 X 1 1/4 WD STOPW/ROUNDED EDGESTO MATCH EXIST.1/4 TEMP CLEARGLASS

    1/2 X 1 1/4 WD STOP

    1/4 TEMP CLEARGLASS1/2 X 1 1/4 WD STOPW/ROUNDED EDGESTO MATCH EXIST.3/4 X 4 7/8 WDFRAME

    5/8 PLYWOOD

    3/4 WD TRIM

    ROOM SIDE

    MAINTAIN BASE ATAPPROX.1/4 ABOVESUBFLOOR FORCARPET TO FIT UNDER

    CARPET

    WD. SIDELIGHT SECTIONAA1.1

    31 1/4 A.F.F.

    93 A.F.F.

    100 A.F.F.

    1/4

    1/4

    9 1/

    41/

    4

    3/8

    1 1/

    4 3/4

    71/

    4

    EQ EQ

    2 4

    2 4

    3/4 3/4

    61 1

    /2

    1 2

    3

    20 1

    /2

    5 NOM

    EQEQ

    2 4

    2 4

    1 x 4 MILLED (TYP)

    3/4 X 4 7/8 WDFRAMESOLID CORE WDVENEER DOOR (TYP)

    3 SOUND BATT INSUL

    5/8 GYP BD ON 3 5/8METAL STUDS

    5/8 GYP BD ON 3 5/8METAL STUDS

    1 x 4 MILLED (TYP)

    1/2 X 1 1/4 WD STOP

    DOUBLE 20 GA METALSTUDS (TYP @ CORNERS)

    5 NOM 44

    42

    42

    SECTION AT DOOR JAMBFA1.1

    INTERIOR ELEVATIONAA1.1

    1/4 TEMP CLEARGLASS (TYP)

    1/4 GLASS PANEL

    GLASS SEAM

    22 23

    BA6.1

    AA6.1