LDR 610 Consulting Theory and Practice Baheejah Lumumba.
-
Upload
shona-greer -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of LDR 610 Consulting Theory and Practice Baheejah Lumumba.
THE DYNAMICS OF CHANGE
LDR 610 Consulting Theory and Practice
Baheejah Lumumba
THE ORGANIZATION
Company culture is usually based on a distinctive, code of conduct that
governs the behavior, attitude, relationships, and style. Whenever
organizations seek the help from a consultant “they understand that the
consultant is person in a position to have some influence over an
individual, a group, or an organization but has no direct power to make
changes or implement programs.” (Block,2011 p.2)
THE CONSULTANT
Although the distinction is important, the consultant needs to function
differently from a line-manager for the consultant’s own sake and for the
learning goals of the client (Block, 2011 p.3)
1 Consultants are key players in change management.
2 Specialize in areas to improve the bottom line.
3 Expertise in discipline, work experience,
4 Credibility will be taken seriously by others.
ACTIVE TOOLS
In the dynamics of change management the first thing consultants should
do is establish a relationship with the client, by building trust. The
combination of trust and a common goal shared by people can make a
powerful team. “Lower trust leads to lower leverage and lower
commitments” (Block, 2011 p.16-38)
1 Only those who are trusted are effective in making changes.
2 “The key to increasing the changes for success is to keep focusing on
how you work with the client”. (p.47)
LISTENING
Because of the vital concerns of managers, consultants, and leaders who
are trying to understand corporate culture, they first must integrate and
understand the complex mix of behaviors, values, and shared
assumptions this can be accomplished by listening.
1. “Listening actively involves paraphrasing, clarifying, and giving
feedback. (Mckay, Davis, & Fanning, 2011 p.17)
2. Communicating effectively is the key for consultants to engage
employees and facilitate change.
CALL TO ACTION
By “Navigating through a client’s management styles and organization
politics-and helping them to look objectively at the data are vital tasks.”
(Block,2011 p.164)
1. Examining the organization element of each challenge as rationally as
the technical part.
2.Presenting problem, Redefinition of problem.
3. Clear and simple picture of what is happening.
4. Technical/Business-Problems –Recommendations.
MEETING FOR ACTION
“ Anytime you present a clear and simple picture of the current situation
and make your recommendations, you do it in hopes of triggering
action”. (Block, 2011 p.229)
1. Creasy (2010) found change management are tools that need to be
applied independent of the actual change that you are undertaking
“anytime you alter processes, systems, organization structures or job
roles, you need a structural approach to manage both the technical side
and the people side of the pending change.” (p.2)
THE DYNAMICS OF CHANGE
The meeting should be structured so that people can articulate their own
ideas and values because, “you will need time to deal with the client’s
resistance.” Block ( 2011 p.235)
1. A Consultant is good at handling difficult situations.
2. All the competencies should be presented before, during, and after the
meeting.
3. Questions should be asked, and ask the client if they are getting what
they want.
THE DYNAMICS OF CHANGE
“ Response that you receive in the meeting will reenact all the problems
that the organization has in solving issues”. Block ( 2011 p. 242)
Kotter, (1995) established eight stages for creating change, it
summarizes the steps for producing successful change of any magnitude
in organizations.
1. Establishing a sense of urgency, creating the guiding coalition.
2. Developing a vision and strategy, Communicating the change vision.
3.Empowering broad-based action, Generating short-term wins.
THE DYNAMICS OF CHANGE 4.Consolidating gains and producing more change.
5. Anchoring new approaches in the culture. ( p.61)
Clarifying the direction of change is important because, more often than
not, people disagree on direction, or are confused. Kotter (1996) found
“with clarity of direction, the inability to make decisions can
disappear.”(p.69)
REFERENCESKotter, J. (1996) Leading Change: Harvard Business School Press
Boston, MA
McKay, M. Davis, M. & Fanning, P. ( 2009) Messages: The communication
Skills book ( Third ed.) New Harbinger Oakland, CA
REFERENCES Block, P. (2011) Flawless Consulting: A Guide To Getting Your Expertise
Used ( Third ed.) Pfeiffer: San Francisco, CA
Creasy, T. (2010) Helping others understand change management in
relation to project management and organizational change
Prosci research (pp.2) Retrieved from
http://www.change-management.com/tutorial-defini
Kotter, J ( 1995) “ Why transformation efforts fall,” Harvard Business
Review ( March-April) no. 61