Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr....
-
Upload
moses-gaines -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr....
Lansing Central School District
District Assessment Results Presentation
January 24, 2011
Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent
District Leadership Team1
AGENDA
District• Results
Overview
• Grades 3-8 ELA, Math, and Science
• Secondary ELA, Math, and Graduation Rate
• 2008-2010 results trends and district comparisons
• Key Findings
Elementary• Grade 3 ELA
and Math• Students with
Disabilities• Students with
Economic Disadvantage
• Grade 4 ELA and Math• Students with
Disabilities• Students with
Economic Disadvantage
• Key Findings
Middle School• Grade 5 ELA
and Math• Students with
Disabilities• Students with
Economic Disadvantage
• Grade 6 ELA and Math
• Students with Disabilities
• Students with Economic Disadvantage
• Grade 7 and Grade 8 (see above)
• Key Findings
High School• Regents exam
results • Integrated
Algebra• Geometry• Earth Science• Living
Environment• Global Studies• US History• ELA• Advanced
Exams
• Graduation Rate
• Key Findings
2
Shared Coordinator for Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development Lauren Faessler 19 years in Education
7 years HS English Teacher 6 years Teaching, Learning, and Social Policy at CU K-12 ELA and SS Curriculum Supervisor, Secondary
Literacy Specialist, District Data Coordinator
3
Changing NY State Standards
•ELA and Math 3-8 Tests change
•Cut points raised to better predict regents performance and college and career readiness
2009-10
•ELA Regents, ELA, and Math 3-8 Tests change; SS 5 and 8 Tests end
•NYS adopts ELA and Math Common Core Standards
•New Graduation Rates
2010-11 •Tests stay consistent and remain aligned with 2005 NYS ELA and Math Standards
•Continue to develop curricula and align instruction to Common Core Standards
20011-12
•CCSS Interim assessments in use
•CCSS based curriculum models available to schools
•PARCC field testing for 2014 roll out
2012-13
4
5
6
District Level Key Findings
Changed Math, ELA, and Secondary Literacy Standards require curriculum development and revision
Lansing continues to perform at highest levels in the TST BOCES region
All TST districts’ proficiency rates declined after NYS raised standards last year
7
District Level Next Steps Ongoing curriculum and instruction work
Scope and sequence, gap analysis, root cause analysis, benchmarking
Board approved curricula
Summer 2011 and 2011-12 Curriculum benchmarking and benchmark
assessments Curriculum alignment to Common Core Standards Analyses of student learning Best practices research and intervention planning
8
Elementary School
District Elementary•Grade 3 ELA and Math•Students with Disabilities
•Students with Economic Disadvantage
•Grade 4 ELA and Math•Students with Disabilities
•Students with Economic Disadvantage
•Key Findings
Middle School High School
Grade 3 ELA
Grade 3 ELA - Students With Disabilities
Grade 3 ELA - Students with Economic Disadvantage
Grade 4 ELA
Grade 4 ELA - Students with Disabilities
Grade 4 ELA - Students with Economic Disadvantage
Elementary Key Findings - ELA Prior to the adjustment of scoring, RC Buckley outperformed both CNYRIC
and TST BOCES in both grades ¾.
When scores were adjusted, a greater percentage of students dropped to a level 2 thn students in CNYRIC. Specifically in grade 3 students identified as being economically disadvantaged and/or receiving special education services.
Initiatives identified in our strategic plan include increasing student
achievement specifically in relation to students identified as economically disadvantaged and receiving special education.
Behavior interventions, targeting instruction (Leveled Literacy Intervention), increased before school academic assistance, increased parental communication and support, faculty and staff professional development, district curriculum council and intentional data analysis, curriculum development
Targeted Instruction for all students.
Grade 3 Math
Grade 3 Math - Students With Disabilities
Grade 3 Math - Students with Economic Disadvantage
Grade 4 Math
Grade 4 Math – Students with Disabilities
Grade 4 Math - Students with Economic Disadvantage
Elementary Key Findings - Math Overall, our students have exceeded both CNYRIC and TST BOCES in
math consistently in the past 5 years.
Our math program is strong and overall student test results demonstrate it’s strength. (Everyday Math 2010)
Specific targeted instruction and curriculum supplementation and development needs to occur for students with academic struggles.
Initiatives identified in our strategic plan include increasing student achievement specifically in relation to students identified as economically disadvantaged and receiving special education
Behavior interventions, targeting instruction, increased before school academic assistance, increased parental communication and support, faculty and staff professional development, district curriculum council and intentional data analysis, curriculum development
Middle School
District Elementary Middle School•Grade 5 ELA and Math•Students with Disabilities
•Students with Economic Disadvantage
•Grade 6 ELA and Math•Students with Disabilities
•Students with Economic Disadvantage
•Grade 7 and Grade 8 (see above)
•Key Findings
High School
24
Grade 5 ELA
Grade 5 ELA Students with Disabilities
Grade 5 ELA Students with Economic Disadvantage
Grade 5 Math
Grade 5 MathStudents with Disabilities
Grade 5 MathStudents with Economic Disadvantage
Grade 6 ELA
Grade 6 ELA Students with Disabilities
Grade 6 ELA Students with Economic Disadvantage
Grade 6 Math
Grade 6 MathStudents with Disabilities
Grade 6 Math Students with Economic Disadvantage
Grade 7 ELA
Grade 7 ELA Students with Disabilities
Grade 7 ELA Students with Economic Disadvantage
Grade 7 Math
Grade 7 Math Students with Disabilities
Grade 7 Math Students with Economic Disadvantage
Grade 8 ELA
Grade 8 ELA Students with Disabilities
Grade 8 ELA Students with Economic Disadvantage
Grade 8 Math
Grade 8 Math Students with Disabilities
Grade 8 Math Students with Economic Disadvantage
Middle School Key Findings 22 out of 24 measures show LMS students higher than
TST and CNYRIC using old thresholds. New NYS thresholds create challenges for the success
of all students, especially those with disabilities. Our #1 challenge is to raise the scores of our students
with disabilities and low SES. Initiatives identified in Strategic Plan are critical for the
success of these students (i.e. improved afterschool programs, mentoring, staff development.)
There is a need for increased focus on data analysis: local, formative assessments, universal screening, and targeted intervention strategies.
High School
District Elementary Middle School High School•Regents exam results •Integrated Algebra
•Geometry•Earth Science•Living Environment
•Global Studies•US History•ELA•Advanced Exams
•Graduation Rate
•Key Findings
50
Regents Data
Regents Data
SAT and AP
Graduation Rate
Key Findings Lansing students continue to score higher on
regents tests than CNYRIC schools. Looking to increase mastery passing, 85 or
higher, rates in all subject areas, on all regents. (strategic plan goal).
SAT scores exceed NYS public schools in all three areas of the test by 50 to 80 points.
All SAT test areas were increased in scores from the pervious year.
AP scores of 3-5 were 92% for Lansing and 64% for NYS public schools.
Key Findings The number of students receiving local and
regents diplomas is up from 2004 cohort, 88% Total number of completers; Diploma, IEP, and
GED is approximately 97% Students counted as drop outs are at 3%
(Strategic Plan Goal) Lansing continues to produces very good test
scores in all areas while maintaining a low drop out rate.