Lansing Central School District Budget Update March 28, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent...
-
Upload
aubrey-wheeler -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Lansing Central School District Budget Update March 28, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent...
Lansing Central School DistrictBudget UpdateMarch 28, 2011
Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent Ms. Mary June King, Business Administrator
Reductions in Workforce
School Year
Reduction Area Number of Positions
2008-2009 Administrator 1
2008-2009 Technology Integration 1
2008-2009 Teachers &Teaching Assistants 9.2
2008-2009 Support Staff 7
2
Reductions in Workforce
School Year
Reduction Area Number of Positions
2009-2010 Teachers &Teaching Assistants 0.6
2009-2010 Support Staff 1
3
Reductions in Workforce
School Year
Reduction Area Number of Positions
2010-2011 Administrator 1
2010-2011 Teachers &Teaching Assistants 7.6
2010-2011 Support Staff 9
4
Reductions in Workforce
School Year
Reduction Area Number of Positions
2011-2012 Teachers &Teaching Assistants 4.4
5
Total Reductions in WorkforceSchool Year
Reduction Area Number of Positions
2008-2011 Administrator 2
2008-2011 Technology Integration 1
2008-2011 Teachers &Teaching Assistants 21.8
2008-2011 Support Staff 19.2
Total All Staff 44.06
Reductions Summary
2008-2012 Positions 44.0 FTE2008-2012 Approximate
Total Personnel-Related Budget Reductions Financial Total
$2,500,000
7
BUDGET TRENDS: Instructional ‘stuff’
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
EQUIPMENT 29,500 26,550 26,100 23,700
CONTRACTUAL 297,747 282,074 232,437 199,733
M & S 297,147 270,690 142,238 142,240
TOTALS 624,397 579,314 400,775 365,673
% change from previous year - 7.22 % - 30.82 % - 8.76 %
TAX LEVY, RATE AND BUDGET HISTORY
• Tax-related calculation for 2008-2009 uses AES as PILOT.
2008-2009 2009-2010 % CHG 2010-2011 % CHG
AVG % CHG
BUDGET 22,838,912 23,944,315 4.8 % 24,377,907 1.8 % 3.4 %
COMB. LEVY 15,175,929 15,785,633 4.0 % 16,028,471 1.5 % 2.8 %
TAX RATE 17.76 17.60 - 0.01 % 18.48 4.9 % 2.0 %
TAX HISTORY CONSIDERATIONS
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
PROJECTED TAX RATE $17.96 $17.76 $18.64
ACTUAL TAX RATE $17.76 $17.60 $18.48
ROLLOVER v. PROJECTED2011-2012
ROLLOVER PROJECTED DIFFERENCE
GENERAL SUPPORT $ 3,058,547 $ 3,005,547 $ - 53,000
INSTRUCTION $ 12,839,185 $ 12,434,185 $ - 405,000
PUPIL TRANSPORTATION $ 1,056,960 $ 996,960 $ - 60,000
UNDISTRIBUTED EXPENDITURES $ 8,838,810 $ 8,838,810 $ 0
TOTALS $ 25,793,502 $ 25,275,502 $ - 518,000
BUDGET CUTS BUILT IN2011-2012
BUDGET CODE ITEM DECREASE IN $$ CAVEATS
1310-490 School Lunch Super 53,000 Offset revenue
2110-120/130/150 Teach Regular Sal 210,000 Grade 1/Science
2110-160 Teach Regular Sal 20,000 TA
2250-150 SPED Instruct Sal 55,000 1 FTE
2250-490 SPED BOCES 110,000 Decreased RFS
2340-490 Inc Youth/BOCES 10,000 Decreased costs
5510-160 Transportation Sal 60,000 Adj. for current exp
TOTALS $ 518,000
BUS PURCHASE PROPOSAL, 11/12(No New Taxes)
• Proposal: Replace two 2001, 66-seat vehicles• Cost new est. $110,000 each• No debt service budget impact:
– $55,000 payment ‘falling off’. – New purchase budgeted payment is < $55,000/year.
PURCHASE 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
FYE 2006 54,830 57,530 0 0 0
FYE 2007 101,025 97,380 93,690 0 0
FYE 2009 93,378 92,663 95,325 97,850 0
FYE 2010 55,528 60,446 59,140 57,820 61,500
FYE 2011 (proposed) 0 0 55,000 58,200 56,200
TOTALS 304,761 308,019 303,155 213,870 117,700
BUDGET STATE AREA TOTALS, 11/12
UNDISTRIBUTED EXPENDITURES2010-2011 2011-2012 % CHANGE
Employee Benefits $ 5,785,403 $ 6,535,412 12.96 %Debt Services $ 2,151,125 $ 2,303,398 7.08 %
Debt Service is offset by matching revenues (state aid)
2010-2011 2011-2012 % CHANGE IN 11/12, AS % OF BUDGET
General Support $ 2,909,334 $ 3,005,547 3.31 % 11.89 %
Instruction $ 12,494,428 $ 12,434,185 - 0.48 % 49.19 %
Pupil Transportation $ 1,037,616 $ 996,960 - 3.92 % 3.94 %
Undistributed Expenditures $ 7,936,529 $ 8,838,810 11.37 % 34.97 %
TOTAL: $ 24,377,907 $ 25,275,503 3.68 %
BUDGET, 11/12(another, but familiar, perspective)
2010-2011 2011-2012 % CHANGE IN 11/12, AS % OF BUDGET
SALARIES $ 10,869,287 $ 10,673,464 - 1.8 % 42.23 %
NON-SALARIES $ 2,318,596 $ 2,424,469 4.57 % 9.59 %
BOCES $ 3,253,495 $ 3,338,759 2.62 % 13.21 %
BENEFITS $ 5,785,403 $ 6,535,412 12.96 % 25.86 %
DEBT SERVICE $ 2,151,125 $ 2,303,398 7.08 % 9.11 %
TOTALS $ 24,377,907 $ 25,275,503 3.68 %
COMPARATIVE BREAK-DOWN:Budget
GEN SUP12%
INSTR49%
TRAN4%
UNDIS EXP35%
2011-12
GEN SUP12%
INSTR52%TRAN
4%
UNDIS EXP32%
2010-11
COMPARATIVE BREAK-DOWNBudget
SAL45%
NON-SAL10%
BOCE13%
BENE24%
DEBT8%
2010-11
SAL42%
NON-SAL10%
BOCE12%
BENE26%
DEBT9%
2011-12
BUDGET INCREASE SPECIFICS2011-2012
• Total proposed budget increase = $ 897,596• ERS/TRS increase = - 306,764
(with cuts)
• Debt Service increase = - 207,344(with matching revenue)
• Remaining budget increase = $ 383,488
$ 383,488 = 1.57%Budget increase for all other costs of doing the
business of providing education
REVENUE PROJECTIONS2011-2012
(with no levy increase, except = f(increased value))
2010-2011(actual) 2011-2012 % CHANGE IN 11/12, AS %
OF BUDGET
STATE AID $ 6,412,246 $ 6,300,311 - 1.75 % 24.93 %
FEDERAL AID $ 455,847 $ 30,000 - 93.42 % 0.12 %
MISCELLANEOUS $ 2,173,329 $ 2,616,721 20.40 % 10.35 %
PILOT $ 2,677,315 $ 2,301,282 - 14.05 % 9.10 %
TAXES $13,351,156 $13,727,189 2.82 % 54.31 %
TOTALS $25,069,893 $25,275,503 0.82 %
REVENUE TRENDS• Tax-related calculation for 2008-2009 uses AES as PILOT. • Calculations for 2011-12 assume levy increase of 2.5%.
2008-2009 2009-2010 % CHG 2010-2011 %
CHG 2011-2012 % CHG
STATE AID 7,176,026 6,383,245 -11.1 6,412,246 0.5 6,300,311 -1.8
FEDERAL AID 17,727 1,051,482 5931 455,847 -56.7 30,000 -93.2
MISCELLANEOUS 2,705,802 784,800 -71.0 513,792 -34.5 449,446 -12.5
APPROPRIATED 0 368,000 1,371,000 372.6 2,016,563 47.1
PILOTS 2,803,784 3,014,745 7.5 2,677,315 -11.2 2,358,814 -11.9
TAXES 12,372,145 12,770,888 3.2 13,351,156 4.5 14,070,368 5.4
25,075,484 24,373,160 24,781,356 24,925,502
FUND BALANCE ANALYSIS(expenses)
• General Support: Central Services • Instructional: Teaching Regular School, Special
Education (08/09 and 10/11)• Transportation: Salaries (def in 09/10), Gas & Diesel• Undistr. Expend: DS (08/09), EB (09/10), wash (10/11)
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 (est)
GENERAL SUPPORT $ 335,939 $ 260,760 $ 35,357
INSTRUCTION $ 508,860 $ 193,314 $ 334,824
TRANSPORTATION $ 202,622 $ 35,808 $ 85,449
UNDISTR. EXPEND $ (121,643) $ 604,173 $ 23,079
TOTALS $ 925,778 $ 1,094,055 $ 478,708
FUND BALANCE ANALYSIS(revenue)
• 08/09: Misc $ reflects reclass of liabilities, < taxes reflects BOE decrease of levy in Aug.
• 09/10: State/Fed aid reflects ARRA/ESF, PILOT/Tax reflects TC assessment documentation
• 10/11: state/Fed aid reflects ARRA/ESF, Misc reflects BOCES refund,
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 (est)
STATE AID $ (6,089) $ (286,033) $ (177,758)
FEDERAL AID $ (66,646) $ 972,117 $ 425,847
MISCELLANEOUS $ 2,112,442 $ 609,926 $ 319,665
PILOT $ 31,864 $ (2,979,755) $ 119,163
TAXES $ (1,079,922) $ 2,482,268 $ (18,751)
TOTALS $ 991,649 $ 798,523 $ 668,166
FUND BALANCE ANALYSIS
2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 (est)
REVENUES $ 991,649 $ 798,523 $ 668,166
EXPENSES $ 925,778 $ 1,094,055 $ 478,708
FUND BALANCE $ 1,917,427 $ 1,892,578 $ 1,146,874
THE AES STORY• At the current tax rate (18.48), every $5 million decrease in AES is a
‘loss’ of $92,400 in tax levy for the District.• To maintain the tax levy, the tax rate must increase to make up for
the decrease in AES value. • Projection assumes: 1% taxable value increase, 0% levy increase.• Lansing budget is similar to similar-sized schools.
Combined Levy
% chg levy Tax Rate Tax Rate
Chg
Chg for 100000 home
Proposed Combined
Levy
16,028,471 0.00% $18.742 1.42% $ 26 $16,028,471
IMPACT OF AES2010-2011
2011-2012
CONTINGENCY BUDGET
CONTINGENCY BUDGET
PROPOSED BUDGET
REQUIRED CUTS
2011-2012 $ 24,954,054 $ 25,275,503 $ 321,449
Multi-Year Financial Projections
27
2011 - 2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
Budget w/out Cuts 25,275,503 26,539,278 27,078,742 Revenue 23,123,824 23,588,650 24,338,650
Budget Gap 2,151,679 2,950,628 2,740,092 Additional Tax Levy 464,826 0 0
Appropriated FB 882,809 961,703 996,915Reserves 804,044 500,000 250,000
Remaining Gap ($0) ($1,488,925) ($1,493,177)
Reduction Scenarios
28
Athletics - Non- Varsity 100,000 Buildings and Grounds cut 1.0 FTE
36,000
Co-curricular 75,000 Elementary School (from 17 to 20 - Grades K-1 from 20 to 25 - Grades 2-4) 4 Teachers 240,000 Encore/Electives 60,000 Enrichment (1.5) 90,000 High School (from 22 to 27) 4 Teachers 240,000 Library Clerk 1.0 - share ms and hs
13,000
Library Media Specialist 60,000 Microcomputer Specialist 1.0 FTE
60,000
Middle School (from 20 to 25) 4 Teachers 240,000
Nursing 40,000 SPED Teacher 1.0 FTE District Wide 50,000 Teacher Leadership Stipends/Positions 40,000
Teaching Assts (13) 520,000
Transportation 100,000
Staff 100,000
Other 100,000
Bad and Ugly Total 2,164,000
Key Questions
• Can we expect outstanding academic achievement results in the future?
• What quality of education are we responsible to deliver to this generation of children in Lansing?
• What quality of education are we willing to support in Lansing?
29
Key Questions• What is an appropriate class size at
each of the schools?• How much transportation should the
district provide?• Should we support a comprehensive
educational and social experience in our schools?
30
Key Questions
• Should we consider partnering with other entities to provide extracurricular and encore opportunities? If so, which ones?
• Are we willing to sacrifice the general conditions of our buildings and grounds? If so, by how much?
• Are we willing to accept that no matter what solutions we implement, all stakeholders will not be satisfied?
31
Summary
• Stay collaborative and come together as a community to solve this problem.
• Minimize the reduction in opportunity for children; takes time and teamwork.
• Understand the consequences of further reductions before making decisions to do so
• Answer the Key Questions
32
REVENUES w/ $2,415,795 APPROP and 0% LEVY
Proposed Budget
Budget to Budget Change
Proposed CombinedTax Levy
% Chg CombinedTax Levy
TaxRate
Tax Rate Chg
Chg for $100,000
Home
25,275,503 3.68% 16,028,471 0% 18.74 1.43% $ 26
REVENUES w/ $ 2,015,046 APPROP and 2.5 % COMBINED LEVY
Proposed Budget
Budget to Budget Change
Proposed CombinedTax Levy
% Chg CombinedTax Levy
TaxRate
Tax Rate Chg
Chg for $100,000
Home
25,275,503 3.68% 16,430,700 2.5% 19.21 3.96% $ 73
REVENUES w/ $ 1,950,926 APPROP and 2.9% Combined levy increase
Proposed Budget
Budget to Budget Change
Proposed CombinedTax Levy
% Chg CombinedTax Levy
TaxRate
Tax Rate Chg
Chg for $100,000
Home
25,275,503 3.68% 16,494,820 2.9% 19.29 4.37% $ 81
34
Proposed Budget Summary
Approved 2010-2011 Budget $ 24,377,906
Proposed 2011-2012 Budget $ 25,275,503
Proposed 2011-2012 Increase $ 897,597
Proposed % Increase 3.68 %