KS/OK Mississippian Completions - University of Oklahoma · KS/OK Mississippian Completions Hap...
30
KS/OK Mississippian Completions Hap Pinkerton Bill Greiser Charlie Smith For Mississippian and Arbuckle Workshop 10/31/2012
Transcript of KS/OK Mississippian Completions - University of Oklahoma · KS/OK Mississippian Completions Hap...
KS/OK Mississippian Completions
Hap Pinkerton
Bill Greiser
Charlie Smith
For
Mississippian and Arbuckle Workshop
10/31/2012
2 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Outline
Mississippian Completion & Permit Review
Geological Review
Historical Trends
Completion and Stimulation Data
Challenges & Solutions
3 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
OK/KS Mississippian Production
9 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Mississippian Overview Summary
The Mississippian formation is actually an age of rock
consisting of
– Chester Lime (Manning)
– Mississippi Chat
– Meramac Lime (St. Louis)
– Mississippi Lime (Solid)
– Osage (Sycamore Lime)
10 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
South Kansas Sample Cross-Section
11 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Woods County Sample Cross-Section w/ Typical
Vertical Well Completions
12 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Example Woods County
Stratigraphic Column
13 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Mississippi Play Extrapolated Vertical Thickness-GeoAtlas
14 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Mississippi Chat Vertical Thickness
15 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Avg Total Gal per Stage
16 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Avg Total Proppant per Stage
17 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Avg Total Acid Gal per Stage
18 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 3F 3G 3H 3I 1A 1B 1C 2A 2B
BO
PD
Woods County - Mississippi Lime Production
30 day Avg
60 day Avg
90 day Avg
120 Day Avg
180 Day Avg
240 Day Avg
19 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F 2G
BO
PD
Grant County - Mississippi Lime Production
30 day Avg
60 day Avg
90 day Avg
120 Day Avg
180 Day Avg
240 Day Avg
20 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 2F
BO
PD
Alfalfa County - Mississippi Lime Production
30 day Avg
60 day Avg
90 day Avg
120 Day Avg
180 Day Avg
240 Day Avg
21 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G
BO
PD
Kay County - Mississippi Production
30 day Avg
60 day Avg
90 day Avg
120 Day Avg
180 Day Avg
240 Day Avg
22 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
6A 7A 7B 7C 7D 7E 7F 7G 7H
BO
PD
Payne County - Mississippian Production
30 day Avg
60 day Avg
90 day Avg
120 Day Avg
180 Day Avg
240 Day Avg
23 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Sleeve Systems
RapidFrac™ Sleeves RapidStart™ Initiator Sleeve RapidStage™ Sleeve
- Reduce Completion Time & Cost
- Cemented & Open Hole Systems Available
- Production Analysis Needed
Challenges & Solutions
24 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MRIL© and WSST© in the Mississippian
Major issues for log interpretation in the Miss are:
– is there sufficient permeability for production
– Identification of fluid type to minimize water production
– Identify ability to initiate fracture treatment and the ability to
maintain treatment geometry
MRIL© identifies permeability and fluid type.
WSST© identifies brittleness and rigidity of the formation
Challenges & Solutions
25 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Miss Section with Oil Water Contact
26 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Miss Section with Transition from Oil to Water
27 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Miss Low Porosity Permeability
Where is Best Landing Horizon?
28 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Miss Low Porosity Permeability
T1 Hydrocarbon Definition
29 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
EASE OF
BREAKDOWN
FRACTURE
TREATMENT
EXTENSION
BARRIERS
Rock Mechanical
Property Solutions
Fracture Treatment Barriers must
be defined and planned for
Vertical properties define ease of
breakdown
Three Dimensional properties
define the quality of placement
Considered together, these
maximize the efficiency of
fracture treatment
30 © 2012 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
DISCUSSION?
