KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT - Europa · Knowledge management analysis, aggregation, etc. Typical reasons...
Transcript of KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT - Europa · Knowledge management analysis, aggregation, etc. Typical reasons...
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Claudia Marenco - Knowledge Management Officer
http://www.fch.europa.eu/
2 main aspects
Data collection
Once per year, for previouscalendar year
Annual programmereview
Culminating in Programmereview days (November)
= Structured capture of data and other knowledgecreated with FCH JU funding
FCH JU data collection
A lot if info is available but…• Not reported in centralised manner• Not reported in consistent manner
And a lot of info is not reported at all !
To have an overview of FCH JU achievementsTo decide the way forward
Gaps in knowledgeNew directions based on new informationNew calls for proposals.. New money…
To justify to the European Commission the money spent
Your role: provide data
OnlineFCH JU secure software
According to template questionnaires related to project content
(anonymised)data outputanalysis
Workflow
datavalidation
datadatainput
targets state-of-art
April-May
Data related toprevious year
Jan 1st – Dec. 31st
Why would you give us data?
1) Because you are grateful of thesupport received by the FCH JU
2) Because you have to !!Deliverables to be included in theDescription of Action (DoA)Every year
(Mar-April)
For Call 2017 projects:Starting in 2019
What data?
Data according to template questionnaire(s) related to thenature of the project.
22 existing template questionnaires:1 or more probably relevant to your project
APU demoCGH2 storage tankDiagnostics - electrolysisDiagnostics - fuel cellsEducationElectrolyser demonstrationElectrolyser research at stack levelElectrolyser research at system levelFC & plug-in car demoFC bus demoFC car demo
FC MHV demoFuel cell research at stack level or lowerFuel cell stack manufacturingFuel cells research at system levelHRS demoHRS researchH2 production demo (excl. electrolysis)H2 production res. (excl. electrolysis)mCHPPNRStationary, general
In practice
Project
Research object 1Template 1
Data provider 1
Research object 2Template 2
Data provider 2
Data provider 3
Research object 3Template 3
Data provider 4
…
1. The project is divided into research objects in agreement with its scopeEach research object is associated to a template questionnaire
2. For each research object, 1 or more data provider(s) is/are nominated bythe project coordinator to provide data
3. The data providers are contacted - receive weblink, credentials andinstruction to participate in the data collection in April-May
In practice: example
Research Object:STATION
Research Object:6 CARS OF BRAND B
Research Object:9 CARS OF BRAND A
Template: car Template: car Template: HRS
PROJECT
Data provider 3Data provider 2Data provider 1
Data provider 4
Example
PARAMETER Data providercomment
FCHJUcomment
Confidentialitylevel
Confidentiality
When you enter the data, there is the possibilityto mark the parameters as public or confidential
Confidential data may be aggregated withother comparable data received from otherprojects to produce anonymised output valuesfrom which it is not possible to workbackwards to obtain the original confidentialvalues
The FCH JU will never disclose any individualconfidential data without prior explicit consent ofthe coordinator (on behalf of the consortium)
Process
FCH JU consults coordinatorto nominate data provider(s)
for each research object
FCH JU sends link andcredentials to data
provider(s)
Data providers provide inputand submit
FCH JU checks
REJECTION
AUTHORISATION
Knowledge managementanalysis, aggregation, etc.
Typical reasons for rejection:• Data reported for wrong period
Correct period is 01 Jan – 31 Dec of previous year• Form is incomplete• Irrelevance of confidential labelling• Incorrect data
Aprilto
June
March
April
We look forward to your input
(Starting in April 2019)
MC(F)1
Slide 13
MC(F)1 MARENCO Claudia ( FCH ), 03/08/2017
FCH JU Programme Review
– Review of the FCH JU programme based on activeprojects
– Includes the event “Programme Review Days”• This year: 23-24 November, 2017, Brussels• Projects are asked to man a poster on progress vs
programme objectives• Selected projects give oral presentations
2017 projects• Active participation (poster,
presentation) from 2019• Attendance welcomed every
year
Programme Review Process
Mayto
Nov.
April
May
Request projects for information• Self-assessment & information for posters (template form(s)• Graphic files for posters
Projects: Docs submission
ProgrammeReview based on
projects’ self-assessment reports
Poster preparation
Agenda preparation in September:notification to projects selected
for oral presentation
Programme Review Days
Programme Review report incl. project posters
Nov
Feb
Bilateral meetings
Room
Project Managers Room / Office
AGUILO RULLAN Antonio 04/20A
BOILLOT Lionel 04/28
CALOPRISCO Pietro 04/20B
GARCIA HOMBRADOSAlberto
04/26
GIRON Enrique 04/30
LYMPEROPOULOS Nikolaos 04/15A
TSIMIS Dionisis 04/15B