Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective
description
Transcript of Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective
![Page 1: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective
Bernice SteinhardtDirector, Strategic Issues
U.S. Government Accountability Office
![Page 2: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Presentation Overview
• The context for indicators: why measure
• U.S. experience with indicators
• Current developments and GAO’s role
• Indicators and the international government audit community
![Page 3: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
The 21st Century: A Period of Profound Transition
• Changing security threats
• Long-term fiscal and environmental sustainability
• Economic recovery and restored growth
• Global interdependency
• Demographic and other social change
• Advancements in science and technology
• Public expectations of government
![Page 4: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Implications for U.S. Government
• Many of the current policies, programs, functions, and activities are based on conditions that existed decades ago and are not well aligned with 21st century realities.
• We cannot afford to continue to do business as usual.
• Accomplishing U.S. government goals will increasingly rely on strengthened mechanisms for collaboration.
![Page 5: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Key National Indicators and Governance in the 21st Century
• U.S. government increasingly has to partner with other governments, other levels of government, private and not-for-profit sectors, to achieve results. Examples:
• Disaster planning, response and recovery
• Environmental protection
• Public health
• Need tools and metrics to link efforts
![Page 6: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Role of Key National Indicator System
Inform strategic planning (link shared purposes)
Enhance performance and accountability
Inform congressional oversight and decision making
Facilitate oversight, and stimulate greater citizen engagement
![Page 7: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
History of Key National Indicators in the United States
• Numerous sets of national-level indicators in response to changing needs and conditions:
• Economic indicators developed during the Great Depression of the 1930s
• Growth in social programs in the 1960s drove need for social indicators (e.g., education, health)
• Concern for environmental protection led to interest in developing environmental data
![Page 8: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Subnational Indicator Systems in U.S.
• While lacking a national indicator system, considerable interest and activity at the city, state and regional levels during last 20 years
• Learning-oriented: information about social, cultural, economic, environmental conditions, presented with little or no commentary or analysis, for educational purposes
• Outcome-oriented: indicators used to monitor and encourage progress toward goals
• About 150 community, state or regional indicator projects across the U.S.
![Page 9: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Efforts to Develop National Indicator System for U.S.
• GAO, in cooperation with National Academy of Sciences, convened forum in 2003 to discuss whether and how to create key national indicator system for U.S.
• About 60 leaders in accountability, business, education, NGO, government, labor, media, minority, scientific, and statistics communities
• Efforts continued over next several years under leadership of National Academy
• Independent non-profit organization created in 2007: State of the USA
![Page 10: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
State of the USA (www.stateoftheusa.org)
• Seeks to provide decisionmakers and the public information needed to
• measure national progress
• evaluate policies and strategies
• permit comparisons to other nations
• Designed to be a Web-based system
![Page 11: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
State of the USA (www.stateoftheusa.org)
• Envisioned as public-private partnership, supported by government and non-government sectors
• All sectors involved in achieving national goals have a stake in outcomes
• Vital to have shared understanding in order to link efforts towards common goal
• Expect to develop about 300 key indicators, including some number of composite indicators in 12 core domains (e.g., environment) and 12 cross-cutting domains (e.g, competitiveness)
• Created 20 key health indicators in 2009
![Page 12: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Congressional Action to Develop a KNI System
• In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-148) included a provision mandating
• the National Academy to establish a U.S. key national indicator system through its own institutional capability or in partnership with an independent, private, nonprofit organization; and
• creation of a bipartisan Commission on Key National Indicators composed of eight members, appointed by congressional leadership, to provide oversight of such a system, among other responsibilities.
![Page 13: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
GAO Role in Legislation
• Act also directed GAO to study previous work conducted by public agencies, private organizations, or foreign countries with respect to best practices for a key national indicator system.
• GAO study also subject of a request from Senate committee chairman to examine other KNI systems and their implications for federal government.
![Page 14: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Research Objectives for GAO Study
• Examine trends in development and maintenance of indicator systems and experiences of key stakeholders
• Identify how indicator systems have been used by governments and stakeholders in policy and management decisions
• Identify factors affecting development and use of indicator systems and their potential implications for (a) the organization responsible for developing and overseeing a key national indicator system and (b) the federal government as data provider and user
• Report to be issued March 2011
![Page 15: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Scope of GAO Study: Case Study Selection Criteria
Comprehensiveness - a mixture of economic, environmental, and social and cultural indicators.
Longevity - in existence for at least 5 years and currently in operation.
Outcome-oriented – measures of progress towards achievement of stated goals or outcomes.
Connection with a governmental entity that uses the system to establish or modify programmatic priorities or to gauge progress in priority areas.
![Page 16: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Indicator Systems Selected as Case Studies
• National: Australia, Switzerland, United Kingdom
• State: Virginia; Victoria, Australia or South Australia
• Local: Boston, MA; King County, WA
• Focused reviews of other indicator systems:• Albuquerque, NM; Jacksonville, FL;Truckee, CA;
Oregon; the European Union, Lisbon Indicators; Finland; Latvia.
![Page 17: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Potential Roles for GAO in Future
• Assess development of indicators or system
• Audit quality of information, including validity and reliability
• Audit effectiveness of KNI system in achieving objectives
• Use indicator data to help target improvement opportunities
![Page 18: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
International Audit Community Interest in Key National Indicators
• In 2007, International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) agreed that KNIs could be an important tool to align government programs and policies with results that citizens care about.
![Page 19: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Opportunities that Indicator Systems Can Provide for SAIs
• Relevant audit work that can inform public discourse and decision making
• Ability to learn from other organizations and countries that have national indicator systems
• Better understanding of government agencies’ contributions to national outcomes
• Increase transparency and accountability
![Page 20: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Role of National Audit Offices in National Indicator Systems
• Nearly all (23 of 27) responding SAIs indicated they performed at least one role vis-à-vis indicator systems:
• Identifying the need for key national indicator systems
• Contributing to system design and implementation• Assessing the indicators/systems• Auditing quality, validity, reliability of indicator
information• Using indicators to assess, report on national
progress• Others: publishing guides, convening discussions,
informing audit work, influencing public discourse
![Page 21: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
INTOSAI Working Group on Key National Indicators
• Goals:
• To support SAIs’ ability to use KNIs in auditing government performance
• To promote exchange of best practices in development and use of KNIs
• To support INTOSAI’s role in promoting development and use of KNIs
21
![Page 22: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
KNI Working Group Activities
• Memorandum of Understanding with OECD
• Participation in OECD World Forum on Measuring Progress
• Collaboration on Guide to KNI Terms and Concepts
• Principles and guidelines for use of KNIs in performance audits
• Survey of international experience in KNI development and use
22
![Page 23: Key National Indicator Systems: A U.S. Perspective](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062321/5681405e550346895dabcff5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
For Further Information
• About GAO—www.gao.gov
• Prior GAO work on Key National Indicators• Informing Our Nation: Improving How to Understand and
Assess the USA’s Position and Progresswww.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-1
• Controller General Forum on Key National Indicators www.gao.gov/products/GAO-03-672SP
• Key National Indicators Mandate• H.R. 3590, Public Law 111-148, Title V, Subtitle G, Section
5605 • Available at www.thomas.loc.gov