Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

12
Designing Effective Instruction Prepared by: Constance A. Harris EDCI-513

description

Designing Effective Instruction Prepared by: Constance A. Harris EDCI-513. Kemp, Morrison, and Ross. Agenda. Model Introduction and Background Visualization Major Characteristics of the Model Comparison with Other Models Strengths & Weaknesses Critical Analysis Exemplar Practices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Page 1: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Designing Effective InstructionPrepared by: Constance A. HarrisEDCI-513

Page 2: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Agenda

Model Introduction and Background Visualization

Major Characteristics of the Model Comparison with Other Models Strengths & Weaknesses Critical Analysis

Exemplar Practices References

Page 3: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Model Introduction

Jerrold Kemp (1977) Instructional Design: A Plan for Unit and

Course Development Target Audience:

Teachers and School Administrators Focus:

Learner centered with special emphasis on the student (K – 16)

Implementation: Instructional Design

Kemp, J. E. (1977). Instructional Design: A Plan for Unit and Course Evaluation (2nd Edition). . Belmont, CA: Fearon-Pitman Publishers, Inc

Page 4: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Instructional Design PlanKemp, 1977

ReviseReviseReviseRevise

Kemp, J. E. (1977). Instructional Design: A Plan for Unit and Course Evaluation (2nd Edition). . Belmont, CA: Fearon-Pitman Publishers, Inc

Page 5: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Exemplar Practice The Use of Planning Cards

•List all details for each plan•Each card contains one:

•Objective•Content Fact•Activity•Evaluation Item

Don’t worry about the number of cards you use or throw away.

Kemp, J. E. (1977). Instructional Design: A Plan for Unit and Course Evaluation (2nd Edition). . Belmont, CA: Fearon-Pitman Publishers, Inc

Page 6: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

What makes this model different? Learner focused instruction General systems focus

Components Interdependent Model emphasized the management

of instructional design processes

Page 7: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Fundamental Components of ID

Page 8: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Comprehensive Instructional Design Plan

Page 9: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Critical Analysis

Learner Focus Project Management

Focus Continuous Improvement Management Revision Adjustment throughout a project Addresses “real world constraints”

Page 10: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Model ComparisonMorrison, Kemp, Ross

Dick and Carey

Orientation Classroom OrientationLarge Scale ID projects

Systems Orientation

Approach Adaptive/Flexible Linear

Project Management Focus

Strong Strong

Learner Focus Strong Addressed during Analysis Phase

Goal Improve Content Develop Instructional System

Steps 9 5

Flexibility Holistic/Changeable Linear• Akbulut, Y. (2007). Implications of two-well known models for instructional designers in distance education: • Dick-Carey versus Morrison-Ross-Kemp. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 8(2), 62-68.• The use of traditional instructional systems: Models for eLearning

%20of%20Traditional%20ISD%20for%20eLearning.pdf

Page 11: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross

Exemplar PracticeThe Payroll System

Page 12: Kemp, Morrison, and Ross