KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd - July 1 st , 2005

10
KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd - July 1 st , 2005 X Resolution Study (Ar/iC4H10)(95/5) Magnetic Field: B = 0, 0.5 and 1T Khalil Boudjemline Carleton University, Ottawa KEK, Tsukuba, July 1 st , 2005

description

KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd - July 1 st , 2005. X Resolution Study. (Ar/iC4H10)(95/5). Magnetic Field: B = 0, 0.5 and 1T. Khalil Boudjemline Carleton University, Ottawa. KEK, Tsukuba, July 1 st , 2005. PAD RESPONSE FUNCTION. B = 0T. PRF for different drift distances. No beam. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd - July 1 st , 2005

Page 1: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

KEK TPC Test BeamJune 22nd - July 1st, 2005

X Resolution Study(Ar/iC4H10)(95/5)

Magnetic Field: B = 0, 0.5 and 1T

Khalil BoudjemlineCarleton University, Ottawa

KEK, Tsukuba, July 1st, 2005

Page 2: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

2

PAD RESPONSE FUNCTION

cmmMagCd /469.)(

PRF for different drift distances

No beam

B = 0T

Preliminary results

cmmFitCd /)2.9535()(

zCdPRFPRF 220

2

Page 3: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

3

PAD RESPONSE FUNCTION

PRF for different drift distances

No beam

B = 0.5T

Preliminary results

cmmMagCd /285.)( cmmFitCd /)52.6297()(

zCdPRFPRF 220

2

Page 4: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

4

PAD RESPONSE FUNCTION

cmmMagCd /193.)(

PRF for different drift distances

No beam

B = 1T

Preliminary results

cmmFitCd /0)(

zCdPRFPRF 220

2

Page 5: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

5

X Residual Mean and X Residual Sigma vs PadRows

Mean

Sigma

B = 0T B = 0.5T B = 1T

B = 0T B = 0.5T B = 1T

Page 6: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

6

X Resolution vs Z B = 0T

B = 1T

eNeff 34

cmmMagCd /469)(

cmmMagCd /285)(

cmmMagCd /193)(

cmmFitCd /)8513()(

mFit 206)(0

cmmFitCd /)10341()(

mFit 242)(0

cmmFitCd /)31243()(

mFit 178)(0

Preliminary results

Rows8B = 0T

B = 0.5T

B = 1T

Fit

Magboltz

12/3.2 mm

Page 7: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

7

X Resolution vs Z (How to fit?)

effx N

zCd

22

02

DiffusionOther

0: resolution w/o diffusion.Cd: diffusion coefficient.Neff: number of electrons.

Diffusion

only eff

xN

zCd1

1- fix Neff from MC

2- fit x = f(z) with 0 and Cd free

3- Plot Magboltz curve with:0 obtained from the fit (2). Cd is known.Neff from (1).

Page 8: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

8

Primary and secondary electrons and Neff calculation

Statistics of primary ionization (Poisson)

n: averagek: actual number

pNk

pnk e

k

NP

!

Cluster Size Distribution

Probability to obtain ne per interaction

MIPpp dxdE

dxdEcmMIPNN

)/(

)/()cos1(6.0/)()(

eN

1

eN

eNeff 44

eN

1

Page 9: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

9

SIGNAL ON THE MESH

Signal on the mesh 55Fe + beam

4 GeV/c beam

3

9.5

3

9.5

dkeV

dkeV

PP

PP0dP

29.59.5

keV

Beam

keV

Beam

Ne

Ne

P

P

55Fe 5.9 keV

(Landau)

eWW

E

W

ENe

HiCAr

IronIronkeV 225

05.095.0 1049.5

eP

PNeNe

keV

BeamkeVBeam 450

9.59.5 For 7.5 cm track

From Monte-Carlo 450e (MIPs)

eNeff 34

Page 10: KEK TPC Test Beam June 22 nd  - July 1 st , 2005

10

ENERGY LOSS

4 GeV/c MIP

20%

.. ionexctotal dx

dE

dx

dE

dx

dE