June 2014 hf operations (handout-na student summit)

21
June 20, 2014 Mark K. Boling President HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OPERATIONS: SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION

Transcript of June 2014 hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Page 1: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

June 20, 2014

Mark K. Boling President

HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OPERATIONS:

SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION

Page 2: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Development Considerations

1

Surface Considerations

Subsurface Considerations

Page 3: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Surface Considerations

2

Air Emissions

Water Use Water Handling Water Reuse & Disposal

Surface Impact • Drilling Locations • Truck Traffic & Road Damage • Infrastructure

Page 4: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Subsurface Considerations

3

Protecting Underground Water Resources

Frac Fluid Disclosure

Page 5: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Protecting Underground Water Resources

4

Well Integrity Is the Key!

Page 6: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Well Integrity

5

Well Construction Standards 2 Evaluate Stratigraphic Confinement 1

Evaluate Mechanical Integrity of Well 3 Monitor Frac Job & Producing Well 4

Page 7: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

4000’ of Sediment

Surface Casing 550’

400’ Usable Fresh Water

2100’ Various Atoka Sands & Shales

1300’ Upper Hale

600’ Morrow Shale

Hindsville

300’ Fayetteville Shale

Evaluating Stratigraphic Confinement

6

Cross sectional view

Virtually all fresh water wells are less than 500 feet deep in the Fayetteville Shale area

Thousands of feet of rock separates the Fayetteville Shale from shallow, freshwater zones

Page 8: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Evaluating Stratigraphic Confinement Shallow Wells and “Frac Hits”

7

850’

400’ Usable Fresh Water

300’ Fayetteville Shale

450’ Atoka Sands & Shales

Abandoned Well

Transmissive Fault

In most shallow formations (less than ~2,000’), the hydraulic fracture will propagate in a horizontal direction.

Cross sectional view

Page 9: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

FRESH WATER AQUIFER ZONE

SHALLOW PRODUCING ZONE

CONDUCTOR PIPE

SURFACE CASING

PRODUCTION CASING

TARGET PRODUCING ZONE

GOOD MECHANICAL INTEGRITY

Page 10: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

CEMENT CHANNELING

PRESSURE BUILDS UP

CONDUCTOR PIPE

SURFACE CASING

PRODUCTION CASING

FRESH WATER AQUIFER ZONE

SHALLOW PRODUCING ZONE

TARGET PRODUCING ZONE

CAS

ING

CEM

ENT

FOR

MAT

ION

Page 11: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Surface Considerations

10

Air Emissions

Water Use Water Handling Water Reuse & Disposal

Surface Impact • Drilling Locations • Truck Traffic & Road Damage • Infrastructure

Page 12: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Regulating Air Emissions

11

Reduction Technology • Catalytic reduction • Ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel • LNG and CNG fuels • Oxidation catalysts • Green completions, vapor recovery

units, low bleed/no bleed pneumatic devices, plunger lift systems, leak detection

Emission Type • NOx • SO2 • CO • Particulates • CH4 • VOCs (incl. BTEX)

Emission Levels • EPA • Industry • State regulators • Research groups

Page 13: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Water Issues

12

Water Use Water Handling Water Reuse & Disposal

Page 14: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

13

US Shale Resources

Page 15: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

14

USA Baseline Water Stress

Page 16: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Water Use Issues

15

Location, Rate & Timing of

Withdrawals Cumulative Impact

Assessment

15

Volumes Needed

Page 17: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Water Handling

16

Trucks vs. Pipeline • Truck Traffic • Road Damage Impoundments vs. Tanks

• Closed-Loop Drilling Systems • Recycling Logistics • Air Emissions

Tracking Wastewater • Characterize Wastewater • Record Volumes Produced • Verify Volumes Delivered

Page 18: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Water Reuse & Disposal

Water Recycling & Reuse • Volume and quality of wastewater • Chemical compatibility • Storage and transportation logistics

Water Treatment Facilities • Flowback & produced water

chemistry • Capacity & Capability limitations

(NORM, DBPs, heavy metals) • Central vs. drill site facilities

Water Disposal Wells

• Geological & hydrological limitations • NIMBY concerns • Triggered seismicity considerations

17

Page 19: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

25,000’

IGNEOUS BASEMENT

LIMESTONE

SHALE

TRIGGERED SEISMICITY WATER DISPOSAL WELL WATER DISPOSAL WELL HORIZONTAL SHALE WELL

SAND

The largest recorded seismic event generates the same amount of energy as would be released when dropping a gallon of milk from chest high to the floor.

EXISTING STRESS

NEW STRESS

Page 20: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

Surface Impact

19

Infrastructure • Compressors • Pipelines • Roads • Water treatment

facilities

Truck Traffic & Road Damage

Drilling Locations • Pit construction • Erosion and

sedimentation • Chemical storage

Page 21: June 2014   hf operations (handout-na student summit)

June 20, 2014

Mark K. Boling President

HYDRAULIC FRACTURING OPERATIONS:

SEPARATING FACT FROM FICTION