June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied...

34
June 2007 Sustainability Forum

Transcript of June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied...

Page 1: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

June 2007

Sustainability Forum

Page 2: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

Joshua Farley, PhDUniversity of Vermont

Community Dev. and Applied EconomicsGund Institute for Ecological Economics

June 2007

Natural Capital

Page 3: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

3

Outline of Presentation

• What is Natural Capital?

• What does this mean for the economy?

• Why is it’s value increasing?

• What does this mean for the waste industry?

Page 4: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

4

What is Natural Capital?The Laws of Physics,The Laws of Ecology

Page 5: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

5

What is Capital?

• Conventional definition: A produced means of production

• Broader definition: A stock that yields a flow of benefits

• Natural capital: The stock of resources provided by nature that yields a flow of benefits for humans• Energy

• Ecosystem goods

• Ecosystem services

Page 6: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

6

First law of thermodynamics

• Matter energy cannot be created or destroyed• We cannot create something from nothing, nor

nothing from something

• All economic production requires raw materials provided by nature

• Continuous physical growth of the economy is impossible

Page 7: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

7

Second law of thermodynamics

• Entropy never decreases in an isolated system• Things fall apart, wear out, become useless

• All economic activity generates waste

• It is impossible to do work or recycle waste without low-entropy energy: no economic production without energy

• There is only a finite stock of accumulated low entropy matter/energy

• There is only a finite flow of solar energy

• The ultimate limit to the physical size of the economic system is our ability to capture low entropy provided by solar energy

Page 8: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

8

Energy

• Finite stock of fossil fuels (finite flow of solar energy, which is a service)

• Use = depletion

• Use = pollution

• 1 barrel of oil = 25,000 hours of human labor

• Substitution very difficult

• What’s the state of the stock?

Page 9: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

9

The Hubbert curve-discovery

Page 10: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

10

The Hubbert curve-production

Page 11: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

11

Unconventional Fossil Fuels

• Alberta tar sands

• Orinoco heavy crude

• Shale oil

• Liquid coal

• Energy return on energy invested very low

• Waste emissions extremely high

Page 12: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

12

Waste Emissions

Page 13: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

13

Ecosystem Goods: Biotic Raw Materials

• We can use them up as fast as we like

• If I use it, you can't• Competition for use

• Private property rights common

• Market goods

• Scarcity price increase innovation of substitutes

• Ecosystem structure, building blocks of ecosystems

Page 14: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

14

Ecosystem Services

• Structure generates function, ecosystem functions of Structure generates function, ecosystem functions of value to humans=ecosystem servicesvalue to humans=ecosystem services

• Climate regulation, water regulation, disturbance Climate regulation, water regulation, disturbance regulation, etc.regulation, etc.

• Waste absorption capacityWaste absorption capacity

• Capacity for ecosystem structure to reproduce itselfCapacity for ecosystem structure to reproduce itself

• Habitat for biodiversity, nutrient cycling, without which Habitat for biodiversity, nutrient cycling, without which other services cannot exist.other services cannot exist.

• Essential to human survivalEssential to human survival

Page 15: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

15

Ecosystem Services

• Provided at a given rate over time

• If I use it, you still can (except waste absorption)• Cooperative in use

• Can't be owned: no property rights (except waste absorption)

• Non-market goods—no price signal

• Scarcity price increase innovation

Page 16: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

16

The Special Case of Waste Absorption Capacity

• Competitive in useCompetitive in use• E.g. If the global climate absorbs US COE.g. If the global climate absorbs US CO22 emissions, it emissions, it

can no longer absorb someone else’scan no longer absorb someone else’s

• Can be assigned property rightsCan be assigned property rights• Government level regulations determine supply and Government level regulations determine supply and

ownershipownership

• We’ve done it in the US for SOWe’ve done it in the US for SO22 emissions emissions

• Kyoto seeks to do this for COKyoto seeks to do this for CO22

• Can be made into a market good through Can be made into a market good through regulationregulation

Page 17: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

17

The Laws of Ecology

• The raw materials converted into economic products are elements of ecosystem structure

• Ecosystem services are provided by a special configuration of ecosystem structure

Page 18: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

18

Ecosystem Services, uncertainty and Ignorance

• We often don't know what services are until they're gone• The ozone layer

• Sardines and global climate change

• Sample size of one: uncertainty is unavoidable

• How much risk do we accept with life support functions?

Page 19: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

19

What does this mean for the economy?

Page 20: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

20

The Economic Problem

• Micro-allocation : how do we allocate resources provided by nature among different economic products?• Markets are favored approach

• Macro-allocation: How do we allocate ecosystem structure between:• Economic production, essential to our survival

• Planetary life support functions, essential to our survival

• Life support functions have no price; markets alone cannot solve this allocation problem

Page 21: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

21

Current Status

Page 22: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

22

Currents status

Page 23: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

23

Earth, Inc.

• If the Earth were a business, how well would you assess the performance of its CEOs?

• We are disinvesting in natural capital• How do you feel about this as a shareholder

in Earth, Inc.?

• Can a business survive if it continually disinvests in essential capital?

• Can an economy?

Page 24: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

24

Why is the value of Natural Capital

Increasing?The laws of economics

Page 25: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

25

Page 26: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

26

What are the limiting factors ?

• Of production?• If we want more seafood, do we need more boats and

factories, or larger wild stocks?• If we want more timber, do we need more chainsaws or

more forests?

• For human well-being?• Material consumption doubles every generation.• Do you want your grand-kids to have more air-

conditioning or more ozone layer?• More cars or more climate stability?• More consumer goods or more ecosystem services?

• We need to invest in the limiting factors

Page 27: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

27

The Demand Curve for Natural Capital

Natura l Capita l S tocks

Ma

rgin

al

Va

lue

Valuable:elastic demand

Critical: Perfectly

inelastic demand

Important: inelastic demand

Natural Capital stocks

Marg

inal valu

e

Demand curve for natural capital

Page 28: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

28

Conventional Economists: Missing the point….

• Schelling (Nobel Memorial Prize in 2005): “Agriculture and Forestry are less than 3% of total output, and little else is much affected. Even if agricultural productivity declined by a third over the next half century, the per capita GNP we might have achieved by 2050 we would still achieve in 2051.”

Page 29: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

29

What does this mean for the waste industry?

Page 30: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

30

How are we addressing macro-allocation?

• For better or worse, government regulation is the main mechanism• Limits to waste emissions

• Limits to resource extraction (mostly fisheries so far)

• Voluntary measures• Often done to pre-empt regulations, or get a jump on

competition

• e.g. Wal-Mart

Page 31: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

31

What is the impact of regulations on waste industry?

• Regulation of waste sector creates markets

• No regulation no waste industry

• More regulation growth in waste industry• E.g. carbon markets: converting methane to energy could

give triple dividend

• Benefits those who anticipate it, may harm those who don’t

• Yet more regulation no-waste industry• Closing the loops

• Waste outputs from one industry become resource inputs into another

Page 32: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

32

Future of the Waste Industry

• Less waste requires more value added, lower costs

• Emphasis must shift from managing waste outflows to handling materials

• Landfills become source, not sink

• Industrial ecology and closed loop systems

• Increased reliance on ecosystem services • Living machines, bacterial digesters, nutrient cycling

• Increased reliance on renewable energy• Ecological processes are solar powered

• Energy from waste

Page 33: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

33

Conclusions

• Natural capital has become the limiting factor in economic production

• Economy must move towards less waste and greater regulation of waste emissions to protect natural capital

• Threat and Opportunity

• Reactive• Regulations forced upon you, no control. • Tough to catch up with the leaders. Other countries well

ahead of us.

• Proactive• Can become leaders in a booming sector• regulations modeled on industry’s innovations

Page 34: June 2007 Sustainability Forum. Joshua Farley, PhD University of Vermont Community Dev. and Applied Economics Gund Institute for Ecological Economics.

34