Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

download Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

of 16

Transcript of Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    1/16

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    2/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 2 of 16

    replication of God's Eden but of Satan's paradigm on Earth. At that moment, just for aninstant, all men will be equalbut mankind will discover, much to their anguish and dismay,that they are a scant 42 months from being judged by their Maker just outside the East Gateof Jerusalem overlooking the Valley of the Son of Hinnomfrom the Hebrew, Ge-Hinnon(orits Greek equivalent, Hades).

    Global totalitarianism, fashioned surreptitiously by the socialprogressives over the last century, began with the prematurebirth of social progressivism in the United States on Sept. 14,1901 when Vice President Theodore Roosevelt assumedthe office of President upon the death of America's 25thPresident, William McKinley who was shot twice by acommunist anarchist, Leon Czolgosz, at the Pan-AmericanExposition in New York on Sept. 6, 1901. McKinley diedfrom gangrene on Sept. 14. SocialProgressive Roosevelt became the 26thPresident of the United States an hour and

    15 minutes after McKinley's death.Czolgosz was sentenced to death andexecuted by electrocution at Auburn Prisonon Oct. 29, 1901. In his final public

    statement, Czolgosz said he killed McKinley because the president was anenemy "...of the good working [class] people."To make sure communistscould not steal his body in order to make him a martyr, he was buried insidethe prison grounds. Sulfuric acid was poured into his coffin before it was

    covered with dirt so that his body, whichwould be immediately, ghoulishlydisfigured, would also begin to decomposewithin 12 hours of burial.

    Today, under Barack Hussein Obama,social progressivism has finally become aneconomic millstone that has finallyshackled every man, woman and child toan increasingly totalitarian State. Americawas effectively disarmed and dissuadedthat communism was a threat since thevery public, very phony coup d' etatofSoviet President Mikhail Gorbechev onAug. 19, 1991, and the made-for-TVdrama that same day when Boris Yeltsinclimbed atop a Russian T-45 tank outsidethe Kremlin and faced-down the CentralCommittee which ostensibly staged thecoupan act that was convenientlyvideotaped for global consumption byCNN. The world watched what they were

    told was people in the second most authoritarian country in the world breaking the shacklesof totalitarianism without a shot being fired. There was only one problem with the made for TV

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    3/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 3 of 16

    drama. It was a made for TV drama. The CNN filming took place during a news blackoutwhen even telephones were theoretically shut off in Russia.

    The Red Army theoretically repeated the Tiananmen Square Massacreon June 4, 1989 thatbegan with bloodless protests on April 14, and tragically culminated with what is known inChina as the June Fourth Movementwhen the People's Liberation Armycrushed the freedom

    movement, killing several hundred Chinese civilians whose only crime was peaceful protest.

    The Soviets have been convinced since the 1950s that communism would prevail and thatthe free enterprise system would ultimately collapse under the weight of its debt. On Nov. 16,1956, 8 years before he was fired as Premier of the Soviet Union, Nikita Khrushchev toldthe American people that "...our firm conviction is that sooner of later Capitalism will give wayto Socialism. Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you."Later, heamended his statement, adding that the Soviets would not beat America in battle, but that:...the United States will eventually fly the communist flagthe American people will hoist itthemselves."

    In the spring of 1964 financier David Rockefeller went to Moscow to meet with SupremeSoviet head Leonid Brezhnevwhere the two ostensibly talked about a wheat deal forRussia. When the meeting ended, the Central Committee agreed to fire Khruschev andretire him to his dachawhich they let him keep (for a year), with a 500 ruble a monthpension (reduced to 400 rubles a month when his dacha was confiscated). People think ofcapitalism and socialism as opposite ends of the political spectrum. They aren't. Socialism isa political ideology. Capitalism is an economic system that controls a nation's trade andeconomic well-being. There are two forms of capitalism: free enterprise capitalism where thepeople are allowed to develop and grow wealth, and statist capitalism where those whocontrol the government, and those closely aligned with them, are the only class of peoplelegally allowed to accumulate wealth.

    Social progressivism did not begin in France. It actually started as anintellectual movement against Catholicism in England in 1688 with theoverthrow of King James II of Scotland after the birth of his son, JamesStuart, who would have been a Catholic monarch had he been allowed toascend to the throne of England. The battle started when James II, aCatholic, inherited the throne in 1685. The Whigs, a minority in Parliament,

    fought to exclude James from the throne. James foughtback by demanding that the English courts make acommon law ruling that would allowhim to enact what wascalled the Test Act, The Test Actwould force publicofficials to pass a religious test to become eligible for publicemployment. James II planned to convert England into a Catholic nation likeFrance. This led to the English Revolution of 1688 and set the stage for thebirth of Illuminism in Europe on May 6, 1776 through Johann AdamWeishaupt, a Jesuit philosophy and law professor at the University ofIngolstat in Germany. Weishaupt developed the concepts of socialprogressivism. The intellectual progressive movement known as Illuminism,or the Enlightenment, continued until the French Revolution when the crown

    heads of Europe realized that the new culture spawned by the aegis of reason fully intended

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    4/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 4 of 16

    to end the monarchies of Europe and form new philosophical systems based on socialprogressiveness.

    Capitalism existed, in one form or another, as a economic system from the 14th century. Ithas existed as a political system since the end of the 18th century with the explosive growthof of a robust middle class in Europe and the American colonies. The middle class grew from

    an increase in trade between the craftsmen in the Old World and the tradesmen of the NewWorld. Modern capitalism was viewed as a good thing for the developed nations of Europe,and the shareholders of the colonies in the New World. As the prosperity of the New Worldgrew, the power of the Old World aristocracy began to wane. As the Age of the Renaissanceended, wars were increasingly fought over wealth and territory rather than political ideology.Nineteenth century Europe is remembered more for its wars than for the expansion of libertysince Europe has always been steeped in a parochial social progressivism that ultimatelyoverwhelmed the aristocratic ruling class. The working class, which bought socialprogressivism as a political system that offered the working class equality discovered, inevery totalitarian state that adopted its principles, they remained shackled to the bondagesystem into which they were born.

    The American economic and political system is rooted in both the Declaration ofIndependence and in the Constitution of the United States. Based largely on the concept ofthe British Bill of Rights, James Madison insisted on adding a Bill of Rights to theConstitution in order to draw a very clear line in the sand. The Founding Fathers, using Emerde Vattel's legal philosophy, The Law of Nationscreated an entirely new system ofgovernance which spells out the basis of liberty. In developing the verbiage of theConstitution, Madison fought with Federalist Alexander Hamilton who believed the well-born were entitled to privilege not provided to the working class. Hamilton fought to include asingle paragraph preamble to spell out the purpose of the Constitution knowing, he explainedin the Federalist papers, that down the road of time, legislators and liberal judges would cometo view the preamble as an implied rights of the central government, opening the door for thesocial progressives to enact a social agenda so far out of the scope of its authority that nocourt should have allowed any portion of the New Deal to be enacted.

    The preamble is 52 words that precedes any of the articles of the Constitution. There isnothing there that any lawyer or judge should trip over. It's merely a simple explanation ofwhat the Constitution affirms to accomplish. It is not a rule of law. Nor is it a delegation ofpower. The preamble, which the liberal federal judiciary has codified as an implied right of thecentral government, simply says: "We the People of the United States, in order to form amore perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for thecommon defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of Liberty toourselves and our Prosperity, do ordain and establish the Constitution of the UnitedStates of America."While every Constitutional lawyer will admit that the preamble does notgrant any authority to anyone, they are equally quick to acknowledge that nor does it deny orprohibit any particular authority. It is not law. It is merely a stipulation that the government hasno authority outside of what follows the preamble. The Federalists, on the other hand, felt thepreamble was sufficient to function as the Bill of Rights. They did not think anything neededto be enumerated, believing the preamble defined the role of government and, as Federalists,didn't think the role of the citizen needed to be defined since it would become whatevergovernment said it would be. That, by the way, is social progressivism at its finest.

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    5/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 5 of 16

    In the 52 word preamble, Congress and the liberal federal court system decided that fourwords: promote the general welfare (that is not found in any of the Articles of theConstitution)allows Congress to assume the power to enact laws dealing with social justiceeven though the specific power to do so is denied them under the 10th Amendment. Theproblem the American people face over this four word clause is found in the UNCharter, Chapter XVI, Article 103 which states that the obligations of member States

    overrides the obligations citizens have to obey national laws that conflict with anyarticle in the UN Charter, or laws which have been formerly adopted by the UN. The UNviews the British Bill of Rights of 1689, from which the UN Universal Declaration of HumanRightsand the UN Convention on Human Rightswas crafted, supersedes the United StatesBill of Rights and mandates that government is obligated to provide for the welfare of itspeople since those tenets are part and particle to the UN Charter and its amendeddocuments.

    To protect the new nation from the Old World banking families, the Founding Fathersestablished the principles of self-determination by constitutionally mandating the coining itsown money from silver, gold and copper as a responsibility of Congress, not private bankers.

    In point of fact, the authority to coin money rested with the House of Representatives whosemembers had the shortest terms in office so the people could get rid of them quickly if theybroke the public trust. Initially, the colonial dollar was the Spanish "Eight Reales" [pieces ofeight]. It was the preferred form of currency during the Revolutionary War since, even if thecolonies lost, the pieces of eight would be accepted as legal tender by England. Congressenacted a law in 1857 to ban to use of pieces-of-eight as legal tender.

    Thus, not only did the Constitution provide a Bill of Rights which made the people co-equalwith its government, it mandated a monetary system based on gold and silver that wascontrolled by the people through the House of Representatives which they controlled, and notthe States. This was done because the people, not the State governments, were ultimatelyresponsible for paying the debt incurred by the nation. (It should be noted that during thereign of Henry VIII from 1509 until his death in 1547, England debased their gold guineas byusing a copper core and covering it with gold. Ultimately, as the coins circulated, the thinlayer of gold wore off the copper cores became visible. The fiat coins were dubbed "redguineas". In 1558 Queen Elizabeth I launched an effort to recall the red guineas and replacethem with solid gold coinage, restoring the prestige of the English monetary system.

    Avarice, however, has no boundaries. In the case of Henry VIII, he debased his nationalcurrency out of greed. During the Election of 1892, the Populist Party (the SocialProgressives). demanded universal labor unions, a national currency backed by at least 50%by silver (based on a 16-60-1 ratio of gold to silver), and a graduatedfederal income tax to provide social benefits for the American people and alaw prohibiting non-US citizens from owning land or property in the UnitedStates. The Populist Party presidential candidate was James B. Weaver,who won 1,041,028 votes and took Colorado, Kansas, Idaho and Nevadaand split the electoral votes in Oregon and North Dakota. Had Weaver notbeen in the race, Harrison would likely have won re-election with 6,217,136to Cleveland's 5,556,918 votes. Cleveland took 277 electoral votes toHarrison's 145 and Weaver's 22. But, remember, without Weaver and theSocial Progressives in the race, those votes would have gone to Harrisonand not Morgan's man, Cleveland. Weaver's 1.047 million votes would

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    6/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 6 of 16

    likely have have flipped California, Texas, Illinois, New York and Wisconsin, and what was amajor victory for Cleveland would have become a narrow win for Harrison. Cleveland, notHarrison, would gone down in history as the one-term president.

    The Democrat, Cleveland, carried the water pail for the Populists, becominga Social Progressive in 1893. In 1894 the Democrats thanked the Populists

    by enacting the Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act of 1894which levied an incometax of 2% on all annual incomes over $4,000, taxing only the rich. Becausethe Democratically-controlled Congress levied an income tax againstAmericans, the voters rebelled against the Democrats and turned control ofCongress over to the Republicans in November of that year. When thevoters elected Ohio Senator William McKinley president, the socialprogressives saw their dream of a socialist Utopia end after one year. Thatwas the reason Leon Czolgosz assassinated McKinley.

    As America prospered, the princes of industry and the barons of banking and businesswhose own prosperity mushroomed from the expanding demand for their wares as the

    working class continued to expand and prosper. The aristocracy and the landed gentry ranfor office and became the governors and the Congressmen and the US Senators. The StateHouses became the domain for the rising middle class. As the professional class grew, thegrowing white collar middle class suddenly found it could compete politically with thearistocratsnot just for his seat in the US House and Senate, but in business. At theconclusion of the Rent Wars, which the landed gentry lost in the North, the rich feltthreatened by the working class and decided it was time to erect some boundaries workingclass political candidates would have trouble crossing.

    The birth of modern social progressivism came through Karl Marx whoargued that the structural contradictions of capitalism would bring about itsown collapse. Socialism, he predicted, would replace capitalism. The fact is,socialism robs personal initiative since under socialism there is no incentiveto work. Thus, socialism will always erode macro-economics stability. Undersocialism, or better yet, under social progressivism only the rich, and thosethey favor, profit financially. Under socialism the masses are reduced tomedieval serfdom where all of those "equal people" live in the perpetualsqualor of generational poverty.

    In 1901 America erred. When President McKinley died, Republican VicePresident Theodore Roosevelt, a social progressive, ascended to the WhiteHouse. Roosevelt arrived at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue at a time when theworking class was becoming increasingly enamored with the illuministicphilosophy that society could, and should, be completely classless. No kings.No lords. No special classes of people. Just plain ordinary men and woman.All working according to their ability and sharing according to their need. Thephilosophy, preached by labor leaders, politicians and even church leaders,sounded good. It sounded fair. It sounded equal. It sounded American. Atleast, the way the social progressive preached it. Roosevelt's affinity forsocialism came into the open in 1912 when JP Morgan convinced him to run

    as a third party candidate against William Howard Taft to guarantee that his own social

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    7/16

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    8/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 8 of 16

    The States, since 1833, prevented the re-establishment of a central bank in the United Statessince Nicholas Biddle's attempt to recharter the 2nd National Bank of the United States fouryear early, in 1832. The bankers did not get their central bank until the fraudulently ratified17th Amendment removed the US Senate from the control of the States and gave it to the KStreet lobbyists in Washington, DC where legal bribes are readily dispersed by the bagmenof the princes of industry, and the barons of banking and business.

    Wilson also attempted to secure a resolution for an 18th Amendment that would haveremoved the US monetary system from the gold standard. That resolution, first attempted in

    1907 failed again in 1913. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Teddy's cousin, and thethird social progressive to make it into the White House, tried as well. FDRwas stopped cold by Sen. Carter Glass [D-VA] who assured Roosevelt theNew Deal would end the very instant anyone offered a Constitutionalamendment to remove the US monetary system from the gold standard.Believing Glass' threat, Roosevelt, who needed to remove our monetarysystem from the gold standard, did the next best thing. Congresssimplyremoved the gold clause from all private and public contracts, and removed

    from our currency the phrase "payable in gold coin to the bearer ondemand." Silver certificates were also no longer redeemable in silvercoinage. The New Deal Congresswhich, like Obama's 111th Congress,

    had a super majority in both Houseslegalized Roosevelt's actions without a singleRepublican vote. They passed the Congressional Gold Repeal Joint Resolutionthat allowedRoosevelt to remove the gold clause from our money after-the-fact. Republicans took FDRto court (294 US 240), but in a 5-to-4 decision, the court ruled that only because of thenational emergency (Obama calls it a national crisis), the court felt obligated to protect theeconomy even though they knew what they were doing was unconstitutional.

    On Jan. 4, 1934 Congress illegally enacting the Gold Reserve Act of 1934. The Gold ReserveActallowed FDR to devalue its new fiat money, which he did. The one dollar bill, whichpreviously was worth 100 was suddenly worth 41 in a form of taxationinflation. WhereWilson committed the sin of destroying the separation of powers, FDR committed an evenworse sin. He created, on his own, a 4th branch of government that was allowed to "fill in theholes,"by interpreting what the laws meant (even if the wording suggested they meantsomething else), and prescribe both the civil and criminal penalties for violating themandyet, the bureaucracy was accountable to no one even though each bureau chief reported to acongressional committee which was theoretically responsible for their conduct and activities.The bureaucracy, wholly a part of the Executive branch, which has no constitutional authorityto legislate or adjudicate was granted both by the New Dealers, and without regard for dueprocess under the Bill of Rights, used their powers to seize the assets ofthose suspected of violating criminal or civil law or petty regulations.

    Roosevelt, like Harry S. Truman and the other Social Progressives whopreceded and followed him, had one common trait. They were all globalists.All of them believed in world government. Only one of them, John F.Kennedy, could be described as a free enterprise capitalist. The rest ofthem were all statist capitalisfs who believed that the small cabal of menwho controlled the government should also control the money. Unlike hismore high profile Oval Office predecessors, Truman's social progressivismdid not make its grand appearance on center stage until he addressed the

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    9/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 9 of 16

    UN General Assembly on Oct. 24, 1950 and made this simple statement that fewnewspapers in the United States printed: "The [US soldiers] who died in Korea died in orderthat the United Nations might live."With the building of the Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall,Americans quickly saw communism as a threat to liberty, and the most high profilecommunists carryovers from the Roosevelt Administration were quickly jettisoned byTruman in self defense. Those who hid their affinity for communism remained and ultimately

    became entrenched career employees within the bureaucracy.

    Like Roosevelt, Truman also attempted to create an Obama-style national healthcaresystem within the Social Security Systemonly far more aggressive...and minus the DeathBoard. It is important to note that when Roosevelt was president, the life expectancy of amale in 1932 when Social Security was enacted was 58.1 years of age. Since the workercould not begin to collect full benefits until age 65, only a handful of wage earners wereexpected to live longer enough to collect benefits. Their spouses, who would likely live toreach 61.6 years of age would almost make it.

    In 1940, the majority of husbands and wives who paid into the system would still have died

    before they reached 65. The only benefit they would have collected would have been the$250 death benefit. Had they lived until the 1950s, the average male recipient of SocialSecurity would likely have collected benefits for six months since the average death age of amale in the United States was 65.5 years. His wife would have survived him by 5.5 years.The problem for Uncle Sam began in 1997 when the average lifespan of a man increased to73.1 years. His wife would likely survive him by about six years. In 2009, man's averagelifespan increased to 78.11 years. With an old age pension system that expected itsrecipients to die before they collected any benefits, or with only about 25% of them living longenough to collect benefits, having recipients collect benefits for one or decades was morethan the system could tolerate. The odds no longer favor "the house."

    Truman, the next Social Progressive to inherit the White House did so on the death ofRoosevelt on April 14, 1945. On Nov. 19 he launched his plan to implement a new nationalhealthcare. (Every Social Progressive tries to enact a healthcare plan. Is it because they areconcerned about the welfare of the people? No. They do so because this is the master taxplan of Utopia. Not only do you get to control all of the wealth owned by everyone, you get tocontrol whether nor not, or precisely when, they die.)

    Like FDR, Truman made the same bet that he could enact socialized medicine. Only,Truman was even more aggressive than FDR or anyone who followed. His program wouldbe a five-pronged attack on healthcareand the taxpayers who would be expected to footthe bill.

    First, Truman decided that every community in America should be able to provide the samequality of medicine as every other community. The first prong of his socialization of medicinewas to fund the pay difference between a rural doctor, nurse or dentist with a metropolitandoctor, nurse or dentist with tax dollars. Second, Truman decided to build between 1,200 to1,500 new hospitals so that every community in the nation had their own healthcare facility.Tax dollars would build and staff the hospitals. That was to make sure the standard of care atthe hospital in Tebo Junction, Arkansas was as good as the standard of care at the MayoClinicor Johns Hopkins.

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    10/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 10 of 16

    Third, Truman planned to establish national standards of health care, and enforce them bylaw. Fourth, to administer the national standards, Truman proposed boards in every medicalspecialty to make sure that the heart bypass done in Tupelo, Mississippi was done exactlythe same way a heart bypass was done at the Cleveland Clinicor Georgetown UniversityHospitalin Washington, DC. (This feature was incorporated in the failed Hillary ClintonHealth Security Act of 1993.) And, the fifth part of the Truman healthcare plan was to provide

    free medical care for every man, woman and child in the United States. What the bureaucratsdidn't like about the Truman plan was that it would be optional.

    Truman's plan went to Congress as an expansion of Social Security. The bill was co-sponsored by Senators Robert Wagner [D-NY] and James Murray [D-MT]. The Houseversion was sponsored by one Congressman, John Dingell [D-MI]. The bill was viciouslyattacked as socialist stupidity by the American Medical Associationwhich characterized thelegislation as a "communist bill,"thus, the term "socialized medicine. "In press conferenceafter press conference, the AMA told the American people that the Truman White Housestaffers "...were followers of the Moscow party line."There was more truth than fiction in thatstatement.

    Sixty-two key FDR staffersall of whom were retained by Trumanwere card-carryingcommunists. Among them were: Adolph Berle, Jr. Assistant Secretary of State;FrankBerman, Dept. of Commerce; Benjamin Cohen, Executive Advisor to Roosevelt; AbeFortas, General Counsel, FEA (and later, Lyndon Johnson's confirmed appointee to the USSupreme Court;1 Nathan Golden, Chief of the Motion Picture Industry Committee in theCommerce Dept.; Harold Ickes, Secretary of the Interior(and father of the current HaroldIckes who served in both the Clinton and Obama Administrations); Henry J. Morganthau,Jr., Secretary of the Treasury; Harold Nathan, Assistant Director of the FBI; FrancesPerkins, Secretary of Labor; Harry Dexter White, Assistant Secretary of Treasury; andsome 51 others, all identified by their confidential communications with the Soviets as agentsof the Soviet government in secret Gestapo files which were surrendered to the OSS (whatevolved into the CIA) by Gestapo chieftain Heinrich Muller in 1948 when Muller wasattempting to keep from being turned over to the Soviets who wanted to silence him forever.

    Included in the materials surrendered to the US government was a a telephone conversationthat took place between FDR and British Prime MinisterWinston Churchill on Nov. 26, 1941 when Churchilladvised Roosevelt that the Japanese fleet was headed toPearl Harbor2 and planned an aerial attack on Monday, Dec.8 (Tokyo time), which would have been Sun., Dec. 7Hawaiian time. In order to place the United States squarelyinto both theaters of war in World War II, FDR agreed to getout of Washington for a few days and "be surprised" whenthe attack happened. Roosevelt got on his specialpresidential train and headed to Warm Springs, Georgia for abelated Thanksgiving holiday. Sadly for the FDR-Churchillplan, the Soviet Embassy warned communist-consort andFDR Secretary of Commerce Harry Hopkins of what theybelieved was the impending invasion of Hawaii by theJapanese. Hopkins told the Joint Chiefs who called FDR andinterrupted his vacation with the shocking news. FDR was

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    11/16

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    12/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 12 of 16

    May 10, when the West Virginia votes were tallied, Humphrey dropped out of the race andpledged his delegates to Kennedy.

    Presumptive Democratic nominee Kennedy met with the Council onForeign Relationsand pledged two things. First, he pledged to disarm theAmerican people. Then, he pledged to disarm the world. The program was

    outlined in State Dept. Publication 7277.The CFR placed four key people on theKennedy team. The most important ofthese would be Robert A. Lovett, whoserved as Truman's Defense Secretary andlater as his Undersecretary of State. Lovettwas offered any cabinet position he wantedin the Kennedy Administration. He turned

    them all down in favor of the role of invisible adviser. Lovettand John J. McCloy, who would create the US Arms Controland Disarmament Agency. Both were key members of the

    CFR member. Both were assigned a special job by the CFR.Their job was to structure the formula for disarming the worldbeginning with the UnitedStates. The other two CFR members were Dean Rusk, who became Secretary of State andRobert McNamara who headed Defense. After the aborted Bay of Pigs invasion, Kennedyno longer trusted any of his CFR handlers, but he was stuck with them.

    The Social Progressives believed the United States had to lead by example. If the UnitedStates completely disarmed itself, they reasoned, the Soviet Union and Red China wouldhave nothing to fear, and would then willingly disarm as well. In reality, as history proved in1939, what would happen would have been a lightning swift invasion, and conquest, of NorthAmerica.

    When the League of Nationsmembers disarmed themselves in 1925-30 under thedisarmament rules penned into the Article 20 of the Treaty of Versailles (the League ofNations Charter), three nations began to amass a war armada, first covertly, then openlychallenging the now weaponless nations of Europe to stop them. The belligerent nationswere the Soviet Union, Germany and Japan. Had the United States not possessed theindustrial strength it had at the time (but no longer possesses), Germany would have easilyconquered all of Europe and Japan would have easily conquered all of Asia. The Fortress ofLiberty would have fallen, with Japan invading North America from the Pacific and throughCanada and Germany invading from the Atlantic and through Mexico.

    Kennedy's social progressive role was to prepare the American people for the soon-comingworld government which was to take place within two decades. Once the nations of Earthwere disarmed and the planned global economy and unified banking system broughtprosperity to the emerging economies, waror at least global warwould be virtuallyimpossible since the economies of all the nations of the world would be so interlocked, that ifone of them collapsed, all of them would collapse.

    Call this the economic version of MAD (mutually-assured destruction) which the world's bestmilitary minds were convinced would prevent a nuclear war since every nuclear power had

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    13/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 13 of 16

    the capability, even after they were largely annihilated, to destroy their destroyers. Thus, anuclear strike against one nuclear power would assure the destruction not only of theattacker, but very likely, all of the remaining nuclear powers. Furthermore, since a nuclearholocaust will trigger a nuclear winter that will blanket out the sun for decades and ultimatelykill almost all plantlife on Earthnot to mention the radiation that would kill a majority of theworld's population that lived in the heaviest radiation zonesMAD was viewed as the safest

    deterrent to nuclear war.

    That is, until the advent of the Islamic extremists and suicide terrorism. For decades the mostunthinkable fear of the industrialized world was that Islamic jihadist extremists would get theirhands on nuclear weapons or the ability to weaponize enriched uranium or plutonium.

    Both happened through the same man, Abdul Qadeer Khan, a nucleartechnician who worked for the Netherlands government when they werebuilding their first nuclear weapon. The Dutch should never have allowed aradical Muslim "technician" anywhere near a facility producing a nuclearweapon, but they did. Khan, known as the "father of Pakistan's nuclear

    weapon technology" is not a scientist.

    3

    He's a thief. Over a period of timeKhan managed to steal all of the Dutch blueprints to build a nuclear weaponand smuggled them out of the Netherlands.

    Khan's latest customer is Iran. When Iran is able to produce nuclearweapons in volume and has the capability to attach them to reliable, accurate missilesystems, they will unhesitatingly use nuclear weapons not only against its first target, Israel,but against the United States, Canada, England, France and Italy: the nations construed bythe Muslim world as the biggest threat against Islamthe Christian nations. Knowing this, theprinces of industry, and the barons of banking and business whose lives evolve aroundwealth and the love of money sadly believe that everyone else in the world feels the sameway about money they do.

    They simply don't understand the jihadic mentality of the Muslims who are determined to killor convert everyone in the world who is not Muslim. To the ideological zealots, wealth servesonly to buy the weapons they need to kill their enemies. The Social Progressives still remainconvinced that the Muslim world will not sacrifice the oil revenues they receive from theindustrialized nations by waging nuclear jihad against them. That's why the princes ofindustry hang "do not drill" signs on every new oil or natural gas find in the United States.They believe as long as the Muslim world profits from US industry, they will be less inclined todestroy it. The Muslim's couldn't care less. They have been waging a 3,000 year Jihadagainst the world of the infidels and they have no intention of stopping until the enemy isbeheaded or converted to Islam. Yet, the Social Progressives still believe they can trust theMuslims, and they are working hard to convince the Muslims that they can trust the SocialProgressives.

    John F. Kennedy learned the fallacy of the Social Progressive argument in 1961 when theCIA convinced him the Bay of Pigs was an essential military operation to protect the MonroeDoctrine. It was an embarrassing fiasco for the new president. It took the Kennedys severalmonths to piece together enough data to realize the project was deliberately staged by theCIA, which was taking their marching orders from the CFR, to fail. The purpose? Ultimately,

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    14/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 14 of 16

    to justify Castro's asking the Soviet Union to bring troops into the western hemisphere toprotect Castro's regime from Kennedy.

    A US Navy F-8 Crusader photographed what the pilot believed were missile bases being builtin Cuba. The CIA assured Kennedy what they were seeing in the spy photos were notmissiles. Kennedy authorized several U-2 flghts over Cuba. The first flight, on Sept. 6

    revealed a consignment of SS-4 medium-range ballistics missiles being offloaded from aSoviet ship. A second consignment of MRBMs arrived on Sept. 16. The U-2s photographedthe construction of 9 missile sites, 6 for SS-4s and 3 for SS-5s. These were "first strike"launchers with a range of 2,400 miles. Castro and the Soviets could reach just about anytarget in the United States they wanted to hit.

    Kennedy demanded that the Soviets dismantle the missile silos and remove all nuclearweapons from Cuba. The Soviets were convinced that the Social Progressives in theKennedy Administration would ultimately do nothing, and the missile bases would becomea permanent fixture in the Western Hemisphere. The American people would soon be goingto bed at night with Soviet nuclear missiles aimed at their country.

    After examining a month's worth of U-2 photos with his brother and his closest advisers,Kennedy convened a meeting with the 14-member Executive Committee of the NationalSecurity Councilat 9 a.m. on Oct. 16 to examine the pictures and see if the "experts" sawwhat the CIA said did not exist. The CIA insisted there were no nuclear missiles in Cuba. But,if you recall, in 1961 the CIA had a fool proof plan to overthrow Castro that could not failuntil Kennedy learned after-the-fact that the "patriots" who invaded Cuba through animpenetrable swamp were armed with weapons of one caliber and given ammunition forentirely different weapons. Kennedy didn't trust the CIA.

    In this instance, Defense Secretary McNamara sided with the CIA. The missile system, they

    insisted, posed no threat to the United States. Kennedy and his brother, the AttorneyGeneral, didn't believe them. Neither did the Joint Chiefs. The US Navy blockaded Cuba andthreatened to launch an attack on the nine missile sites if they were not dismantled, put backon the Soviet ship and returned to Russia. At 7 p.m. on Oct. 22 Kennedy said: "It shall be thepolicy of this nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation inthe Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring afull retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union."The following day, the Joint Chiefs took theStrategic Air Command to DEFCON 2, the only time in US history this has happened. Themessage was transmitted uncoded to make sure Soviet intelligence got the message. Thecrisis ended after 13 days, on Oct. 28 when Khrushchev announced that the Sovietgovernment was going to dismantle the missile systems and remove them from Cuba.

    Kennedy, who became more popular with the people, lost his value to the SocialProgressives on the same day. One year and 25 days later, on Nov. 22, 1963, the princes ofindustry corrected the Election of 1960 in Dallas, Texas. Unknown to them, a second plot toassassinate Kennedy by a second group of people not linked to the first group wasunderway at precisely the same place and at precisely the same time. Lee Harvey Oswaldwas shot to death by Jack Ruby not because he killed Kennedy but because he did not.

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    15/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    Page 15 of 16

    In July, 1964, David Rockefeller met withKhrushchev for two and a half hours before visitingthe Central Committeeof the Supreme Soviet to talkabout importing grain from the West due to thedrought in the Ukraine, the Soviet grain belt. On Oct.14, 1964 Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev was

    fired. Both antagonists of the Missile Crisis had beenremoved from power. World government stillremained tomorrow's dream for the socialprogressives.

    In 1973 when CFR-member Gov. Jimmy Carter [D-GA] contemplated throwing his hat in the ring tounseat the United States' first appointed president,Gerald Ford in 1976, he sought the backing of the

    CFR . The CFR liked Carterbecause he was the perfect

    political chameleon. He wasan ardent Social Progressivewho would appeal to Bible Beltconservatives.

    On December 13, 1973, theman who wanted to becomethe 39th President of the United States appeared on the popular TVshow, What's My Line?and stumped the panel. A week or two prior tohis prime time TV appearance Carter met with CFR Chairman DavidRockefeller in London, England where the key European globalistsendorsed Carter to replace Ford. Carter was assigned a CFR handler,Madeleine Albright. Carter became the worst president in the historyof the United States until the advent of America's first illegal alien head-

    of-state, Barack Obama. Through his CFR handlers Carter helped the communist DanielOrtega take over in Nicaragua and on the advise of Albright, Rockefeller and a group of thenation's largest bankers, Carter agreed to surrender the Panama Canal to the Panamaniangovernment in 1999 to provide them with the revenue stream they needed to pay of $14billion in loans supplied by those very banks to Panama.. And, finally, Carter altered thebalance of power in the Mideast by helping Islamic extremists overthrow the pro-WesternIranian Shah Muhammed Riza Pahlavi and putting into power Ayatollah RuhollahKhoemeini. Khoemeini's return set into motion the current problems with a nuclear Iran weface today. But Carter's worst sin was never revealed.

    As the United States spiraled into hyperinflation, President Jimmy Carter agreed tosurrender America's role as the holder of the world's "reserve currency" to the central bankersof the world who planned to use a basket of 4 currencies controlled by the InternationalMonetary Fundto replace the US dollar as the world's "reserve currency." (That basket ofcurrencies grew from 4 to 16 and is now 24.)

  • 8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The ISMS of Social Progressivism

    16/16

    Jon Christian Ryter The isms of Social Progressivism

    P 16 f 16

    Had Jimmy Carterwho was deliberately destroying the US economy by creating a financialcrisis severe enough to force the implementation of the plans of the CFR, the Bilderbergersand the IMFbeen re-elected, a global monetary unit would have been replaced the dollarwithin a year without the need to first regionalizing the world's currencies in a multi-stepprocess before collapsing them into a single global unit.

    Had Ronald Wilson Reagan, the man who was supposed to lose in the primary of 1980 tothe CFR's hand-picked candidate, George Herbert Walker Bush, lost that primary to Bush-41, the US Treasury full of IMF-issued SDRs would have become the world's reservecurrency sometime during 1981. The hands of the proverbial doomsday clock, however, havenot stopped ticking. If anything, they are moving faster. Obama's Social Progressive agendahas put the globalists back on track. If Obama is not defeated in 2012, the United States willcease to exist as a world power by 2015. Sometime between 2016 and 2017 it will become atotalitarian "democracy." The Social Progressive princes of industry and the barons ofbanking and business have quietly and covertlybut in the open for all eyes to see butdisbelievemoved their assets from the United States. If the United States does not takeback their nation in November, 2010, the options available to the American people will be

    greatly diminished in January, 2011. Using the same type of voter fraud that elected Obamain 2008, the losses sustained by the Social Progressives in 2010 will be reversed in 2012,and by 2016 the American political system will resemble the elections in any other third worldpowers with a one party totalitarian dictator functioning as president for life.

    This is what has happened in every nation in the world where the people assumed it wassomeone else's responsibility to protect their rights.

    Endnotes:

    1 Politicians should no t be allowed to play politics with the m ilitary dur ingwartime: http://www.jonchristianryter.com/Two_Cents/2cworth.080414.html

    2 The Ten Wor st Presidents:http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2007/070306.html

    3 Yellowcake Race: http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2007/070121.html

    ###