Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup Eric Heflin/Judith Huntman Aug 22, 2012.
-
Upload
joanna-skinner -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup Eric Heflin/Judith Huntman Aug 22, 2012.
Joint Exchange / Interop Work Group Test Workgroup
Eric Heflin/Judith HuntmanAug 22, 2012
Roll
2
Name Organization RepresentationNick VanDuyne NYeC StateIvan Handler ILJohn Donnelly NJ Task Group Co-Chair - IWGMarty Prahl SSA
Federal agencyDennis Peterson, Curtus Browning, Elaine Hunolt, Taimur Aslam, Willie Singletary, Monica VanDyke VHA
Kevin Brady NIST NISTDavid Tao, Dan Huber Siemens
EHR VendorDave Cassel, Rob Klootwyk Epic Bill Howard, Charles Parisot GEJeff Cunningham, Tim Dunnington ICA
HIE vendor
Mike LaRocca Intersystems
Vladi Reznikov, Jennifer Puyenbroek CONNECT PMO
Matt Bell, Tom Wilson, Kathy Lin AxolotlTeddy Gedamu MedfxMelissa Owens Marshfield Clinic Health SystemSteve Leighty MedVirginia
Regional HIE Brian Bonnington, Dave Trepanier, Dave Smith, Steve Michael IHIE
Anuj Desai Interop WG Interop WGEric Heflin THSA Task Group Co-Chair - ExchangeMariann Yeager Exchange Exchange Ed O'Connor, Judith Hutman Nitor ONC Testing Contractor
Dennis Wilson, Alisa Ray, Sue Rieber CCHIT
ATCBs and Testing SMEs
Jim St. Clair IHE USA
Amit Trivedi, Kevin Brown, Michella Knighton ICSA Labs
Traci Mapps SLI Global SolutionsKyle Meadors, Timothy Bennett Drummond Group
Milton Padilla, Steve Wilson, Mark Shin, Doublas Biggs, Les Biggs InfoGuard
• Roll Call – Cayla
• Announcements – Eric
• Direct harmonization – Judith
• Test execution status – Judith
• soapUI demo – Judith
• Open Discussion – All
• Wrap Up/Schedule Review - Eric
Agenda
3
• Harmonized PD/QD/RD/MP/AF (aka Patient Record Lookup) Tests Were Ratified Last Week• Future changes are possible, but will be incorporated into the next
phase of test cases design and implementation (post Oct 2012)
• http://exchange-iwg.wikispaces.com/Test+Artifacts+Harmonization
• Pilot is beginning
• RFP• Has 5 respondents
• Evaluations are still under way
Announcements
4
Harmonization Phases
Phase 1 – SOAP
Query/Retreive
Phase 2 – Direct Send/Receive
Phase 3 – Secondary Methods, Service
Discovery, & Provider Directories
•Parent Use Cases (Done)•Test Case harmonization (Done)•Tests: Mess & Auth Framework (Done)•Tests: Patient Discovery (XCPD, PIX, PDQ), Query for Documents, Retrieve Documents (Done)
•Test Execution Guides (Done)
•Parent Use Cases•Test Case harmonization•Tests: Direct Applicability Statement (Done)
•Tests: Direct XDM/XDR-Bridge (Done)•Tests: Direct Certificate Discovery (Done)
•Test Execution Guide
•Parent Use Cases•Test case harmonization•Tests: Web Services Registry (Done)•Tests: HPD+•Tests: Document Submission (Done)•Tests: Administrative Distribution (Done)•Test Execution Guides
Unified Test Process – Has Been Proposed
Direct Harmonization
Analysis of Test Artifacts
• Breaking down EHR-HIE Test Spec into modular components
• Mapping to ONC test cases
Test Approach:Direct only v. Internal actors
Direct Messaging
Internal Actor Messaging
Internal Actor Testing
Direct Messaging
FR-2SMTP Sender
to HISP
FR-3HISP to SMTP
Receiver
FR-5HISP Sender
to HISP Receiver
FR-7SMTP to SMTP
Deployment Model E.1
E.1
FR-5HISP Sender to HISP Receiver
FR-9SMTP to XD
FR-4HISP to XD
Receiver
FR-7SMTP to SMTP
FR-6XD to XD
Deployment Model E.2
E.2
FR-5HISP Sender to HISP Receiver
FR-7SMTP to SMTP
FR-1XD Sender
to HISP
FR-8XD to SMTP
FR-6XD to XD
Other Deployment Models: Unclear Testing Path
Deployment Model B
FR-5HISP Sender to HISP Receiver
FR-7SMTP to SMTP
Deployment Model C
FR-5HISP Sender to HISP Receiver
FR-7SMTP to SMTP
Sample Analysis: Edge Protocol EHR-HIE Test Spec FR-2
FR-2: SMTP Sender to HISP
* Internal actors specified
* Send XDR not proscribed in Direct specs
FR-2: Applying a Modular Approach
Direct Messaging
DM1 DM2
DM3
Cert Discovery
CD1
CD2
CD3
EHR-HIE ApplicantProduction Participant
Deplmnt A Reqts
FR2
A2
A3
Eve
nt-
Bas
ed
Inte
rop
Tes
tin
g
DM1
DM2
CD1
CD2
FR2
A2
Deplmnt B Reqts
B1 B2
B3
DM3
CD3
A3
Deplmnt X Reqts
X1 X2
X3
XD Conversion
XD1
XD2
XD3
FR-2SMTP to HISP
Sample Analysis: NormativeEHR-HIE Test Spec FR-5
FR-5: HISP Sender to HISP Receiver via S/MIME
FR-5: Applying a Modular Approach
Direct Messagi
ng
DM1 DM2
DM3
Cert Discove
ry
CD1
CD2
CD3
EHR-HIE ApplicantProduction Participant
Deplmnt A Reqts
FR1
A2
A3
Eve
nt-
Bas
ed
Inte
rop
Tes
tin
g
DM1
DM2
CD1
CD2
FR1
A2
Deplmnt B Reqts
B1 B2
B3
DM3
CD3
A3
Deplmnt X Reqts
X1 X2
X3
XD Convers
ion
XD1
XD2
XD3
FR-5Sending HISP to
Receiving HISP
‘round-the-room
• Should we levy normative conditional requirements for specified deployment models / edge protocols?
• If so, how far do we go in accommodating other (unknown) deployment models?
Where does conversion occur?
This end-to-end testing shows one possible model. Here, XD conversion is tested at the Sender Test Module. But it could be done at other hops too.
Test Execution Status
Automating Test Case Execution: soapUI scripts complete
Priority High Med Low X (untargeted) TOTALS
PD 7 3 3 13
QD 18 16 0 2 34
RD 5 6 1 12
M+A 1 15
Direct 18
TOTALS 48 34 6 88
NEW
NEW
soapUI Demo
‘round-the-room
• Does the (soapUI-based) approach seem appropriate?
Open Discussion
•RFP released — July 2nd
•Questions received by 6 organizations
•Answers distributed — July 13th
•Bids due — July 20th
•Evaluating
•Expected award — TBD
•Contract start — TBD
Schedule Review
30
We are here (running late)