JOHN SHAEFFER, SBN 138331 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP · PDF fileWorldVentures Marketing, LLC, and...
Transcript of JOHN SHAEFFER, SBN 138331 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP · PDF fileWorldVentures Marketing, LLC, and...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF REMOVAL
JOHN SHAEFFER, SBN 138331
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
1800 Century Park East, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1506
Telephone: 310-598-4150
Facsimile: 310-556-9828
E-mail: [email protected]
Attorney for Defendants WorldVentures Foundation, WorldVentures Holdings, LLC and Wayne Nugent
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
MELODY YIRU, aka SHI YIRU, an individual, and all those similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v. WORLDVENTURES HOLDINGS, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; WORLD VENTURES, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; WORLDVENTURES FOUNDATION, a Texas corporation; WORLDVENTURES MARKETING LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; MICHAEL AZCUE, an individual; WAYNE NUGENT, an individual; and DANIEL STAMMEN, an individual; and DOES 1-100;
Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO.: NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF DEFENDANT WORLDVENTURES FOUNDATION, WORLD VENTURES HOLDING, LLC AND WAYNE NUGENT
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 1 of 52 Page ID #:1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT, ALL PARTIES
AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446,
Defendants WorldVentures Foundation, WorldVentures Holdings, LLC and Wayne
Nugent (“Served Defendants”), hereby remove to the United States District Court for
the Central District of California, Western Division, the civil action styled as
MELODY YIRU, aka SHI YIRU, an individual, and all those similarly situated,
WORLDVENTURES HOLDINGS, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company;
WORLD VENTURES, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; WORLDVENTURES
FOUNDATION, a Texas corporation; WORLDVENTURES MARKETING LLC, a
Nevada Limited Liability Company; MICHAEL AZCUE, an individual; WAYNE
NUGENT, an individual; and DANIEL STAMMEN, an individual; and DOES 1-100
Case No. BC659422, which was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California,
County of Los Angeles, Central District (the “State Court Action”). This civil action
is removable pursuant to pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1441(a) and pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441(b). In accordance with the requirement of 28 U.S.C. §
1446(a), a “short and plain statement of the ground for removal” is set forth below.
I. INTRODUCTION
1. On or about May 1, 2017, plaintiff Melody Yiru, a.k.a. Shi Yiru
(“Plaintiff”), filed her Complaint (“Complaint”) in the Superior Court of the State of
California, County of Los Angeles, in the State Court Action.
2. On or about May 11, 2017, Defendant WorldVentures Foundation (the
“Foundation”) was served with a copy of the Summons and Complaint.
3. On or about May 26, 2017, Defendants WorldVentures Holdings, LLC
(“WorldVentures”) and Wayne Nugent were served with copies of the Summons and
Complaint.
4. Undersigned counsel is not aware of service of the Summons and
Complaint upon any other defendant named in the State Court Action.
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 2 of 52 Page ID #:2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL
5. Exhibit 1 hereto constitutes “a copy of all process, pleadings and orders”
served upon the Served Defendants in the State Court Action. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a).
6. Exhibit 2 hereto is a copy of the court’s docket in the State Court Action.
7. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges that the WorldVentures is a membership-
based travel services business and that the Foundation and Nugent participate in this
business. Plaintiff alleges that WorldVentures is an illegal pyramid scheme.
8. Plaintiff alleges that from 2011 to the present, she and as many as
250,000 other members of her purported class were misled about the financial
structure and likelihood of financial gain from their participation (through initial and
monthly membership fees) in WorldVentures’ business.
9. Plaintiff alleges that, despite what appeared to be truthful and
encouraging Annual Disclosure Statements, the only way to generate income as a
Sales Representative was not through the sales of travel-related services, but through
the recruitment of additional Sales Representatives.
10. Plaintiff alleges that nearly all Sales Representatives lost money through
their involvement with WorldVentures.
11. Based on these allegations, Plaintiff brings three state law claims arising
under section 1689.2 of the California Civil Code (Endless Chain Scheme), section
17200, et seq., of the California Business & Professions Code (Unfair and Deceptive
Practices), and section 17500, et seq., of the California Business & Professions Code
(False Advertising) as well as three federal claims arising under the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968.
12. None of the Served Defendants has filed an answer or other responsive
pleading in the State Court Action.
13. As explained below, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this
matter based on both federal question jurisdiction and diversity jurisdiction.
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 3 of 52 Page ID #:3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL
II. THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE CAUSES OF ACTION
ARISING UNDER FEDERAL LAW.
14. Removal of the State Court Action to this Court is proper under 28
U.S.C. § 1441(a) because the State Court Action is a civil action over which this
Court has original jurisdiction founded upon a claim or right arising under the laws of
the United States. Here, the Court has original jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ claims
under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-
1968 (Counts IV-VI).
15. Plaintiff’s Complaint contains three causes of action arising under the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, (“RICO”) 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-
1968, over which this Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Count IV of Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(a) arising out
of a purported conspiracy which involved the investment of ill-gotten funds in an
allegedly fraudulent enterprise. Count V of Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges that the
defendants named in the State Court Action conducted their purportedly fraudulent
affairs as an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §
1962(c). Count VI of Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges a section 1962(d) conspiracy by
and between the defendants named in the State Court Action to violate sections
1962(a) and (c).
16. Regardless of whether a RICO claim is predicated on a violation of state
or federal law, this Court has original jurisdiction over such a claim. See Jean Tech.,
Inc. v. NYDJ Apparel, LLC, 2015 WL 4919974, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2015)
(citing Perryman v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, 2014 WL 4954674, at *6 (N.D. Cal.
Oct. 1, 2014) (“the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s RICO claims
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 18 U.S.C. § 1964”).
17. Accordingly, this Court has original jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s RICO
claims.
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 4 of 52 Page ID #:4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4 NOTICE OF REMOVAL
18. This Court also has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s remaining
state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) (“[I]n any civil action of which the district
courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental
jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such
original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy…”).
19. Therefore, removal of the entire State Court Action is warranted based on
the Court’s original jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s RICO claims.
III. THE COURT HAS JURISDICTION BASED ON THE DIVERSITY OF
THE NAMED PARTIES.
20. Removal of this action is also proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) because
Plaintiff’s purported class action claims are subject to the Class Action Fairness Act
(“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(d), 1453, and 1711-1715, and because the matter
satisfies the diversity criteria of 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
21. As this Court has held, “CAFA gives district courts original jurisdiction
to hear class actions “in which the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of
$5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs,” and “in which [, inter alia,] any member
of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a State different from any defendant.” Leon v.
Gordon Trucking, Inc., 76 F.Supp.3d 1055 (C.D. Cal. 2014) (citing 28 U.S.C. §
1332(d)(2); Luther v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, 533 F.3d 1031, 1033–
34 (9th Cir. 2008)).
22. Further, for CAFA to apply, the aggregate number of members of all
proposed classes must exceed 100 individuals. See id.
23. Significantly, under CAFA, “complete diversity is not required” for the
Court to have original jurisdiction or for the case to be removable to federal court. See
Luther, 533 F.3d at 1033-34 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1453(b)).
24. Here, Plaintiff’s purported class action claims satisfy all of the
prerequisites for the application of CAFA and, in turn, to confer original jurisdiction
over this matter to this Court.
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 5 of 52 Page ID #:5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5 NOTICE OF REMOVAL
25. The requirement that the class exceed 100 members is satisfied because
Plaintiff alleges that the “members of the Class are greater than 250,000, nationwide.”
(Complaint ¶ 57).
26. Plaintiff also alleges damages well in excess of $5,000,000.
27. Plaintiff alleges that “99.7% of WorldVentures enrollees average a loss
of -$1057.77 per year.” (Complaint ¶ 48(g)).
28. Based on Plaintiff’s allegation of a 250,000 member class and an alleged
loss of $1,057.77 per member, the total loss per year alleged is $264,442,500.00.
29. As Plaintiff alleges losses occurring from 2011 to present, Plaintiff’s total
alleged damages on behalf of the class are in excess of $1.5 billion.
30. Finally, CAFA’s augmented diversity requirement is satisfied because
there is diversity among the parties.
31. Plaintiff alleges that she is an individual residing and doing business in
the State of California. (Complaint ¶ 7).
32. Plaintiff does not allege that any of the defendants named in the State
Court Action are residents of or incorporated under the laws of the State of California.
(Complaint ¶¶ 8-14).
33. The Foundation is alleged to be a Texas corporation. (Complaint ¶ 11).
34. WorldVentures is alleged to be a Nevada limited liability company.
(Complaint ¶ 8).
35. Nugent is alleged to be a resident of the State of Texas. (Complaint ¶ 12).
36. Further, each of the additional individual defendants named in the State
Court Action is alleged to be a resident of the State of Texas. (Complaint ¶¶ 13-14).
37. In addition, the other business entities named in State Court Action,
WorldVentures Marketing, LLC, and WorldVentures, are all alleged to be entities
formed under the law of the State of Nevada. (Complaint ¶¶ 9-10).
38. As CAFA only requires diversity of one plaintiff and one defendant, the
complete diversity of the parties is more than adequate to satisfy this prerequisite.
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 6 of 52 Page ID #:6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6 NOTICE OF REMOVAL
39. Accordingly, removal of the State Court Action is warranted based on
the application of the Class Action Fairness Act.
40. In addition, the complete diversity of the parties as pled and the amount
in controversy in excess of $75,000 also satisfies the requirement for removal
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b).
IV. THE REMAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR REMOVAL HAVE BEEN
SATISFIED
41. All procedural requirements for removal have been satisfied.
42. This Notice of Removal is timely as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b),
because it is not filed more than one year following the commencement of the action
and within thirty (30) days of the service of the Summons and Complaint upon
WorldVentures Foundation, the first defendant to be served in this case. See 28
U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(B) (“Each defendant shall have 30 days after receipt by or service
on that defendant of the initial pleadings or summons described in paragraph (1) to file
the notice of removal.”)
43. Removal to this Court and this division is proper, insofar as the State
Court Action was pending in Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los
Angeles; and the United States District Court for the Central District of California,
Western Division, embraces the location of the state court in which the State Court
Action was filed. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(a) and 1446(a).
44. This notice of removal is accompanied by true and correct copies of all
pleadings, process and orders on file in the Superior Court of the State of California,
County of Los Angeles. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a).
45. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d), concurrently with the filing of this
Notice of Removal, Served Defendants are serving written notice of the filing of this
Notice of Removal, with a copy of this Notice of Removal attached, upon Plaintiff’s
counsel. Additionally, Served Defendants are filing a copy of this Notice of Removal
(including the materials filed in support hereof) with the Clerk of the Superior Court
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 7 of 52 Page ID #:7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7 NOTICE OF REMOVAL
for the State of California, County of Los Angeles (the court from which the State
Court Action was removed). See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d).
46. All defendants served with the Summons and Complaint have joined this
removal and have consented to removal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(A) (“all
defendants who have been properly joined and served must join in or consent to the
removal of the action”). The Served Defendants are not required to obtain the consent
of parties who have not been properly served. See Destino v. Reiswig, 630 F.3d 952,
955 (9th Cir. 2011).
47. Served Defendants have not previously sought similar relief with respect
to this matter.
48. The allegations in this Notice of Removal are true and correct.
49. Accordingly, this civil action is properly removable to the United States
District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division.
WHEREFORE, the Served Defendants respectfully request that the State
Court Action be removed to this Court and placed on the docket of this Court for
further proceedings as though originally instituted in this Court. If any question arises
as to the propriety of the removal of this action, the Served Defendants respectfully
request the opportunity to present a brief and oral argument in support of their position
that this civil action is removable.
Dated: June 12, 2017 FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP By: _/s/John Shaeffer John Shaeffer, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants WorldVentures Foundation, WorldVentures Holdings, LLC and Wayne Nugent
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 8 of 52 Page ID #:8
EXHIBIT 1
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 9 of 52 Page ID #:9
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 10 of 52 Page ID #:10
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 11 of 52 Page ID #:11
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 12 of 52 Page ID #:12
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 13 of 52 Page ID #:13
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 14 of 52 Page ID #:14
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 15 of 52 Page ID #:15
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 16 of 52 Page ID #:16
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 17 of 52 Page ID #:17
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 18 of 52 Page ID #:18
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 19 of 52 Page ID #:19
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 20 of 52 Page ID #:20
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 21 of 52 Page ID #:21
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 22 of 52 Page ID #:22
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 23 of 52 Page ID #:23
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 24 of 52 Page ID #:24
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 25 of 52 Page ID #:25
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 26 of 52 Page ID #:26
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 27 of 52 Page ID #:27
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 28 of 52 Page ID #:28
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 29 of 52 Page ID #:29
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 30 of 52 Page ID #:30
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 31 of 52 Page ID #:31
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 32 of 52 Page ID #:32
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 33 of 52 Page ID #:33
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 34 of 52 Page ID #:34
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 35 of 52 Page ID #:35
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 36 of 52 Page ID #:36
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 37 of 52 Page ID #:37
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 38 of 52 Page ID #:38
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 39 of 52 Page ID #:39
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 40 of 52 Page ID #:40
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 41 of 52 Page ID #:41
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 42 of 52 Page ID #:42
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 43 of 52 Page ID #:43
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 44 of 52 Page ID #:44
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 45 of 52 Page ID #:45
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 46 of 52 Page ID #:46
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 47 of 52 Page ID #:47
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 48 of 52 Page ID #:48
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 49 of 52 Page ID #:49
EXHIBIT 2
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 50 of 52 Page ID #:50
Case Summary
Please make a note of the Case Number.
Click here to access document images for this case.If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.
Case Number: BC659422MELODY YIRU ET AL VS WORLDVENTURES HOLDINGS LLC ET AL
Filing Date: 05/01/2017Case Type: Racketeering Case (General Jurisdiction)Status: Pending
Future Hearings
07/14/2017 at 10:00 am in Department 310 at 600 South Commonwealth Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90005Initial Status Conference(file Joint ISC Report by 6/30/17)
Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Parties
AZCUE MICHAEL - Defendant/Respondent
DOES 1-100 - Defendant/Respondent
LINDEMANN LAW FIRM APC - Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
NUGENT WAYNE - Defendant/Respondent
STAMMEN DANIEL - Defendant/Respondent
WORLD VENTURES - Defendant/Respondent
WORLDVENTURES FOUNDATION - Defendant/Respondent
WORLDVENTURES HOLDINGS LLC - Defendant/Respondent
WORLDVENTURES MARKETING LLC - Defendant/Respondent
YIRU MELODY - Plaintiff/Petitioner
YIRU SHI - Plaintiff/Petitioner's DBA
Case Information | Party Information | Proceeding Information
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
05/23/2017 Notice (OF COURT ORDER RE NEWLY FILED CLASS ACTION AND NT OF ISC )Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
05/17/2017 Order (Initial Status Conference Order )Filed by Court
05/03/2017 Summons FiledFiled by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
05/01/2017 Complaint
Page 1 of 2LASC - Case Summary
6/12/2017http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/popupCaseSummary.aspx
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 51 of 52 Page ID #:51
Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed
Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)
05/17/2017 in Department 310, Kenneth R. Freeman, PresidingOrder-Complex Determination - Case Determined to be Complex
Case Information | Party Information | Documents Filed | Proceeding Information
Page 2 of 2LASC - Case Summary
6/12/2017http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/popupCaseSummary.aspx
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 52 of 52 Page ID #:52
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com
JS 44 (Rev. 06/17) CIVIL COVER SHEET
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
Melody Yiru, aka Shi Yiru, an individual, and all those similarly situated DEFENDANTS
Worldventures Holdings, LLC, et al. (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Los Angeles County of Residence of First Listed Defendant Collin County, TX
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED. (c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
John Shaeffer (SBN 138331)
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
1800 Century Park East, Ste. 300
Los Angeles, CA 90067 / Tel: 310-598-4150
Blake J. Lindemann (SBN 255747) and Daren M. Schlecter (SBN 259537)
LINDEMANN LAW FIRM, APC Law Office of Daren M. Schlecter, APC
433 N. Camden Drive, 4th Floor 1925 Century Park East, Ste. 830
Beverly Hills, CA 90210 Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: 310-279-5269 Tel: 310-553-5747
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (For Diversity Cases Only)
(Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff
and One Box for Defendant)
1 U.S. Government Plaintiff
2 U.S. Government Defendant
3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party)
4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
Citizen of This State
Citizen of Another State Citizen or Subject of a
Foreign Country
PTF DEF 1 1
2 2
3 3
Incorporated or Principal Place
of Business In This State Incorporated and Principal Place
of Business In Another State Foreign Nation
PTF DEF 4 4
5 5
6 6
IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “X” in One Box Only) Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions. CONTRACT TORTS FORFEITURE/PENALTY BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
110 Insurance
120 Marine
130 Miller Act
140 Negotiable Instrument
150 Recovery of Overpayment
& Enforcement of Judgment
151 Medicare Act
152 Recovery of Defaulted
Student Loans (Excludes Veterans)
153 Recovery of Overpayment
of Veteran’s Benefits
160 Stockholders’ Suits
190 Other Contract
195 Contract Product Liability
196 Franchise
PERSONAL INJURY 310 Airplane 315 Airplane Product
Liability 320 Assault, Libel &
Slander 330 Federal Employers’
Liability 340 Marine 345 Marine Product
Liability 350 Motor Vehicle 355 Motor Vehicle
Product Liability 360 Other Personal
Injury 362 Personal Injury -
Medical Malpractice
PERSONAL INJURY 365 Personal Injury -
Product Liability 367 Health Care/
Pharmaceutical Personal Injury
Product Liability 368 Asbestos Personal
Injury Product Liability
PERSONAL PROPERTY 370 Other Fraud 371 Truth in Lending 380 Other Personal
Property Damage 385 Property Damage
Product Liability
625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881
690 Other
422 Appeal 28 USC 158 423 Withdrawal
28 USC 157
375 False Claims Act
376 Qui Tam (31 USC 3729(a))
400 State Reapportionment
410 Antitrust
430 Banks and Banking
450 Commerce
460 Deportation
470 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
480 Consumer Credit
490 Cable/Sat TV
850 Securities/Commodities/ Exchange
890 Other Statutory Actions
891 Agricultural Acts
893 Environmental Matters
895 Freedom of Information Act
896 Arbitration
899 Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
950 Constitutionality of State Statutes
PROPERTY RIGHTS
820 Copyrights
830 Patent
835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application
840 Trademark LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
720 Labor/Management Relations
740 Railway Labor Act
751 Family and Medical Leave Act
790 Other Labor Litigation
791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
861 HIA (1395ff)
862 Black Lung (923)
863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
864 SSID Title XVI
865 RSI (405(g))
REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS FEDERAL TAX SUITS
210 Land Condemnation
220 Foreclosure
230 Rent Lease & Ejectment
240 Torts to Land
245 Tort Product Liability
290 All Other Real Property
440 Other Civil Rights
441 Voting
442 Employment
443 Housing/ Accommodations
445 Amer. w/Disabilities- Employment
446 Amer. w/Disabilities- Other
448 Education
Habeas Corpus: 463 Alien Detainee
510 Motions to Vacate Sentence
530 General
535 Death Penalty
Other: 540 Mandamus & Other
550 Civil Rights
555 Prison Condition
560 Civil Detainee - Conditions of Confinement
870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant)
871 IRS—Third Party 26 USC 7609
IMMIGRATION
462 Naturalization Application
465 Other Immigration Actions
V. ORIGIN (Place an “X” in One Box Only) 1 Original
Proceeding 2 Removed from
State Court 3 Remanded from
Appellate Court 4 Reinstated or
Reopened 5 Transferred from
Another District
(specify)
6 Multidistrict Litigation- Transfer
8 Multidistrict
Litigation - Direct File
VI. CAUSE OF ACTION
Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):
18 U.S.C. § 1962 Brief description of cause:
RICO
VII. REQUESTED IN
COMPLAINT:
CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION
UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P.
DEMAND $
1,500,000,000 CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint:
JURY DEMAND: Yes No
VIII. RELATED CASE(S)
IF ANY (See instructions):
JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
DATE June 12, 2017 SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD /s/John Shaeffer FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1-1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:53
American LegalNet, Inc.
www.FormsWorkFlow.com
JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 06/17)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44
Authority For Civil Cover Sheet
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of
Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:
I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section "(see attachment)".
II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below. United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box. Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked. Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)
III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.
IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If there are multiple nature of suit codes associated with the case, pick the nature of suit code
that is most applicable. Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions.
V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the seven boxes.
Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts. Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box. Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing
date. Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date. Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers. Multidistrict Litigation – Transfer. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. Multidistrict Litigation – Direct File. (8) Check this box when a multidistrict case is filed in the same district as the Master MDL docket.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS NOT AN ORIGIN CODE 7. Origin Code 7 was used for historical records and is no longer relevant due to changes in statue.
VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1-1 Filed 06/12/17 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:54
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
JOHN SHAEFFER, SBN 138331
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
1800 Century Park East, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1506
Telephone: 310-598-4150
Facsimile: 310-556-9828
E-mail: [email protected]
Attorney for Defendants WorldVentures Foundation, WorldVentures Holdings, LLC and Wayne Nugent
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
MELODY YIRU, aka SHI YIRU, an individual, and all those similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v. WORLDVENTURES HOLDINGS, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; WORLD VENTURES, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; WORLDVENTURES FOUNDATION, a Texas corporation; WORLDVENTURES MARKETING LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; MICHAEL AZCUE, an individual; WAYNE NUGENT, an individual; and DANIEL STAMMEN, an individual; and DOES 1-100;
Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO.: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1-2 Filed 06/12/17 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:55
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this action.
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business
address is 1800 Century Park East, Suite 300, Los Angeles, California 90067-3005.
On June 12, 2017, I served the following document(s) described as:
1. NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF DEFENDANTS WORLDVENTURES
FOUNDATION, WORLD VENUTRES HOLDINGS, LLC AND WAYNE
NUGENT;
2. CIVIL COVER SHEET; AND
3. CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES
on the interested parties in this action as follows:
Blake J. Lindemann, Esq.
LINDEMANN LAW FIRM, APC
433 N. Camden Drive, 4th Floor
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Tel.: 310-279-5269
Fax: 310-300-0267
E-Mail: [email protected]
Darren M. Schlecter, Esq.
Law Office of Daren M. Schlecter, APC
1925 Century Park East, Ste. 830
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: 310-553-5747
Counsel for Plaintiff
Melody Yiru and Those Similarly
Situated
[ ] BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I caused said document to be personally
delivered the document(s) to the person at the addresses listed above by leaving the
documents in an envelope or package clearly labeled to identify the attorney being
served with a receptionist or an individual in charge of the office.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on June 12, 2017, at Los Angeles, California.
Case 2:17-cv-04357-PA-KS Document 1-2 Filed 06/12/17 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:56