John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

41
Constructive Alignment in Constructive Alignment in Learning, Teaching and Learning, Teaching and Assessment Assessment John Biggs John Biggs Catherine Tang Catherine Tang ATN Assessment Conference: “Engaging Students in ATN Assessment Conference: “Engaging Students in Assessment” Assessment” U of SA, 20-21 November, 2008 U of SA, 20-21 November, 2008

description

Keynote at the ATN Assessment conference 2008

Transcript of John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Page 1: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Constructive Alignment in Learning, Constructive Alignment in Learning, Teaching and AssessmentTeaching and Assessment

  

John BiggsJohn BiggsCatherine TangCatherine Tang

ATN Assessment Conference: “Engaging Students in Assessment” ATN Assessment Conference: “Engaging Students in Assessment” U of SA, 20-21 November, 2008U of SA, 20-21 November, 2008

Page 2: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Activity 1Activity 1

As a teacher, what do you want to achieve in As a teacher, what do you want to achieve in teaching?teaching?

Share your views with your colleagues.Share your views with your colleagues.

Page 3: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

The focus in teaching is not what we teach but The focus in teaching is not what we teach but what we would like our students to learn and what we would like our students to learn and how how we can help them achieve that.we can help them achieve that.

The first step therefore is to define the intended The first step therefore is to define the intended learning outcomes for our students.learning outcomes for our students.

Teaching and assessment are then designed and Teaching and assessment are then designed and implemented to align to these outcomes.implemented to align to these outcomes.

Page 4: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

The Intended Outcomes of This SessionThe Intended Outcomes of This Session

1.1. Explain constructive alignment.Explain constructive alignment.2.2. Identify intended learning outcomes for one Identify intended learning outcomes for one

of your teaching units.of your teaching units.3.3. Design teaching/learning activities to best Design teaching/learning activities to best achieve one of your intended learning achieve one of your intended learning outcomes. outcomes.4.4. Design tasks to assess how well the intended Design tasks to assess how well the intended learning outcome has been achieved.learning outcome has been achieved. 5. Reflect on the impact of this session on your 5. Reflect on the impact of this session on your

teaching and assessment. teaching and assessment.

Page 5: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Why “Constructive Alignment”?Why “Constructive Alignment”?

‘constructive’ refers to the idea that students construct meaning through relevant learning activities.

‘alignment’ refers to a learning environment where teaching and learning activities, and assessment tasks, are aligned to the intended learning outcomes of a subject.

Page 6: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Implementing Constructive Alignment in Implementing Constructive Alignment in Learning, Teaching and AssessmentLearning, Teaching and Assessment

ILO: What the

studenthas to learn

Teaching:Engaging the student in the

verb in the ILO

Assessment:

How wellthe student has achieved

the ILO

Page 7: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Constructive AlignmentConstructive Alignment

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) expressed as verbs students have to enactexpressed as verbs students have to enact

AA The very best understanding that could beThe very best understanding that could be reasonably expected:reasonably expected: verbs such as verbs such as hypothesise, apply to “far” domains, hypothesise, apply to “far” domains, generate, create, critically review etc.generate, create, critically review etc.

BB Highly satisfactory understanding: Highly satisfactory understanding: verbs verbs such as explain, solve, analyse, evaluate,such as explain, solve, analyse, evaluate, justify etc.justify etc.

CC Quite satisfactory learning, with under-Quite satisfactory learning, with under- standing at a declarative level: standing at a declarative level: verbs such verbs such as describe, elaborate, classify etc.as describe, elaborate, classify etc.

DD Understanding at a level that would Understanding at a level that would warrant a Pass:warrant a Pass: low level verbs, alsolow level verbs, also inadequate but salvageable higher level inadequate but salvageable higher level attempts.attempts.

Teaching / LearningTeaching / Learning ActivitiesActivities

Designed toDesigned to elicit desired ILOelicit desired ILO verbsverbs

May be:May be:

Large class activitiesLarge class activities

Small class activitiesSmall class activities

Teacher-managedTeacher-managed

Peer-managedPeer-managed

Self-managedSelf-managed

Classroom-basedClassroom-basedOutside classroomOutside classroom

as best suits contextas best suits context

Assessment TasksAssessment Tasks

FormatFormat such that such that the target verbs arethe target verbs areelicited and elicited and deployeddeployedin context.in context.

CriteriaCriteria clearly allow clearly allowjudgement as to thejudgement as to thequality of the quality of the student'sstudent'sperformanceperformance

Page 8: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Designing Constructively AlignedDesigning Constructively Aligned Teaching and AssessmentTeaching and Assessment

There are four steps in designing such teaching and assessment:There are four steps in designing such teaching and assessment:

1. describe 1. describe intended outcomesintended outcomes in the form of in the form of standardsstandards students are to attain using appropriate learning verbs.students are to attain using appropriate learning verbs.

2. create a 2. create a learning environmentlearning environment likely to bring about the likely to bring about the intended outcomes. intended outcomes.

3. use 3. use assessment tasksassessment tasks enabling you to judge if and how well enabling you to judge if and how well students’ performances meet the outcomes.students’ performances meet the outcomes.

4. develop 4. develop grading criteriagrading criteria ( (rubricsrubrics) for judging the quality of ) for judging the quality of student performance.student performance.

Page 9: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)

UniversityUniversity level levelWhat are the attributes of an ideal graduate of the University? What are the attributes of an ideal graduate of the University?

Programme Programme levellevelWhat are the intended learning outcomes for students enrolled What are the intended learning outcomes for students enrolled

in the programme?in the programme?

Subject/UnitSubject/Unit level levelWhat are the intended learning outcomes for students taking a What are the intended learning outcomes for students taking a

particular subject/unit at a particular level within the particular subject/unit at a particular level within the

programme?programme?

Page 10: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)

. Statements of what students are expected to be . Statements of what students are expected to be able to do as a result of engaging in the learning able to do as a result of engaging in the learning process (studying a subject/programme). process (studying a subject/programme).

. ILOs should reflect the level of the programme / . ILOs should reflect the level of the programme / subject. subject. . Expressed from the students' perspective.. Expressed from the students' perspective.

. Expressed in the form of action verbs leading to . Expressed in the form of action verbs leading to observable and assessable outcomes. observable and assessable outcomes.

. Related to criteria for assessing student . Related to criteria for assessing student performance. performance.

Page 11: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

The VerbsThe Verbs in the ILOsin the ILOs

. It is useful to express ILOs by using appropriate . It is useful to express ILOs by using appropriate verbsverbs..

. Teaching is specifically aimed at . Teaching is specifically aimed at activatingactivating those verbs. those verbs.

. Students should be unable to complete the assessment . Students should be unable to complete the assessment tasks unless they enact the same verbs that are in the tasks unless they enact the same verbs that are in the ILOs (criterion-referenced). ILOs (criterion-referenced).

. Generic high level verbs include: . Generic high level verbs include: apply,apply, conceptualiseconceptualise, , reflectreflect, , create original insightscreate original insights, , solve unseen problemssolve unseen problems, , generate new alternatives, critically reviewgenerate new alternatives, critically review. Such verbs . Such verbs might typically be used to define an HD or D grade in might typically be used to define an HD or D grade in meeting the ILOs, depending on the subject/unit. Low meeting the ILOs, depending on the subject/unit. Low level verbs such as level verbs such as describedescribe, , identifyidentify, would be more , would be more frequent in defining P.frequent in defining P.

Page 12: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Procedures in Designing Subject ILOsProcedures in Designing Subject ILOs

1.1. Select the topics to be taught.Select the topics to be taught.

2.2. Decide the levels of understanding/performance the Decide the levels of understanding/performance the students are expected to achieve for the different students are expected to achieve for the different topics. topics.

3.3. Consider if all the ILOs are of equal importance.Consider if all the ILOs are of equal importance.

4. Ensure a clear understanding and agreement of the 4. Ensure a clear understanding and agreement of the ILOs within the teaching team and other relevant ILOs within the teaching team and other relevant

parties e.g. External Reviewer.parties e.g. External Reviewer.

5. Communicate the ILOs to students.5. Communicate the ILOs to students.

Page 13: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

The SOLO Taxonomy with The SOLO Taxonomy with sample verbs indicating levels of understandingsample verbs indicating levels of understanding

CompetenceCompetence

Prestructural Unistructural Multistructural Relational Extended AbstractPrestructural Unistructural Multistructural Relational Extended Abstract

one relevant several relevant integrated into generalized to one relevant several relevant integrated into generalized to aspect independent aspects a structure new domainaspect independent aspects a structure new domain

IdentifyIdentifyNameNameFollow Follow simplesimple procedureprocedure

CombineCombineDescribeDescribeEnumerateEnumeratePerform serial Perform serial skillsskillsListList

AnalyseAnalyseApplyApplyArgueArgueCompare/Compare/ contrastcontrastCriticizeCriticizeExplain Explain causescausesRelateRelateJustifyJustify

CreateCreateFormulateFormulateGenerateGenerateHypothesizeHypothesizeReflectReflectTheorizeTheorize

IncompetenceIncompetence

FailFailIncompetentIncompetentMisses pointMisses point

. . . . . . ..

Page 14: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Some vague ILO verbs – to be avoidedSome vague ILO verbs – to be avoided

AppreciateAppreciateBecome aware of Become aware of Familiarise withFamiliarise withKnowKnowLearn aboutLearn aboutUnderstandUnderstand

These verbs don’t tell the student or the These verbs don’t tell the student or the teacher how they would know if the ILO has teacher how they would know if the ILO has

been met. ILOs need to specify a standard of been met. ILOs need to specify a standard of performance. performance.

Page 15: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Activity 2 - Writing Subject ILOsActivity 2 - Writing Subject ILOs

Take a subject that you are teaching. Consider the subject aim Take a subject that you are teaching. Consider the subject aim and write the subject ILOs by identifying:and write the subject ILOs by identifying:

11. . The content or topic to be learned.The content or topic to be learned.2. The intended level of understanding/performance to be 2. The intended level of understanding/performance to be

achieved. achieved.

Content / topic Intended level of understanding /performanceContent / topic Intended level of understanding /performance

Now go across the rows and write out the subject ILOs by stating the Now go across the rows and write out the subject ILOs by stating the content and the intended level of understanding/performance.content and the intended level of understanding/performance.

Subject ILOs:Subject ILOs:1.1.2.2.3.3.

Page 16: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Programme and Subject ILOsProgramme and Subject ILOs

Alignment between the programme and subject ILOsAlignment between the programme and subject ILOs

Programme Programme ILOsILOs

1.1. Are the ILOs aligned?Are the ILOs aligned?2.2. Do the subject ILOs appropriately address the programme ILOs?Do the subject ILOs appropriately address the programme ILOs?3. Are there any gaps?3. Are there any gaps?

SubjectSubject ILOsILOs

SubjectSubject 1 1 SubjectSubject 2 2 Subject 3Subject 3

Page 17: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Designing Teaching/Learning Activities to Designing Teaching/Learning Activities to Align to Intended Learning OutcomesAlign to Intended Learning Outcomes

Having designed subject ILOs, we now needHaving designed subject ILOs, we now need to activate the verbs or learning activitiesto activate the verbs or learning activities embedded in the ILOs by designing suitable embedded in the ILOs by designing suitable

Teaching/Learning Activities that will Teaching/Learning Activities that will facilitate students achieving the ILOs. facilitate students achieving the ILOs.

Remember: Remember: There are many alternatives to There are many alternatives to lectures and lectures and tutorials, even in large classes.tutorials, even in large classes.

Page 18: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Four common teaching situations and associated Four common teaching situations and associated teaching and learning activitiesteaching and learning activities

SituationSituation Teaching activitiesTeaching activities Learning activitiesLearning activities

LECTURE Talk, explain, clarify LECTURE Talk, explain, clarify Listen, take notes, accept, query, Listen, take notes, accept, query, discuss with peers, one-minute discuss with peers, one-minute

paperpaper

TUTORIAL Set/answer questions TUTORIAL Set/answer questions Pre-read, prepare questions, Pre-read, prepare questions, provide feedback provide feedback learn from peers, critique, analyselearn from peers, critique, analyse

PROJECT Set brief, provide PROJECT Set brief, provide Apply, create, self-monitor,Apply, create, self-monitor, ongoing feedback ongoing feedback communicate, teamwork communicate, teamwork

PBL PBL Set problems Set problems Set learning goals, design, apply, Set learning goals, design, apply, provide feedback provide feedback access desired content and skills, access desired content and skills,

integrate, solve problems integrate, solve problems

What teaching /learning activities will best facilitate your ILOs?What teaching /learning activities will best facilitate your ILOs?

Page 19: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Typical ILOTypical ILO Possible TLAsPossible TLAsDescribeDescribe Set reading, lecture, report on Set reading, lecture, report on

field trip, write essayfield trip, write essayExplainExplain Tutorial, activities, write essayTutorial, activities, write essayIntegrateIntegrate Project, assignmentProject, assignmentApplyApply Project, case studyProject, case studySolve problemSolve problem PBL, case studyPBL, case studyDesign, createDesign, create Project, poster Project, poster HypothesiseHypothesise Experiment, projectExperiment, projectReflectReflect Reflective diaryReflective diary

The point is not how you are going to teach but how and what The point is not how you are going to teach but how and what you want your students toyou want your students to learn.learn.

NOTE! Many of these TLAs can be assessments tasks as well. NOTE! Many of these TLAs can be assessments tasks as well. Then you have excellent alignment. Then you have excellent alignment.

Page 20: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Activity 3 – Designing Teaching and Learning Activity 3 – Designing Teaching and Learning ActivitiesActivities

Refer to one of the subject ILOs that you have identified in Refer to one of the subject ILOs that you have identified in Activity 2, design TLAs to align with the ILO.Activity 2, design TLAs to align with the ILO.

Subject ILO:Subject ILO:

Now double-check if the student learning activities are Now double-check if the student learning activities are aligned to the verbs nominated in the subject ILO.aligned to the verbs nominated in the subject ILO.

Share your ideas with your colleagues.Share your ideas with your colleagues.

Teaching situationTeaching situation Teaching activities Teaching activities Learning activities Learning activities (What the teacher does)(What the teacher does) (What the students do) (What the students do)

Page 21: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Assessment Tasks (ATs)Assessment Tasks (ATs)

.. Provide students the opportunity to demonstrate whether or Provide students the opportunity to demonstrate whether or not they have achieved the ILOs and what level their not they have achieved the ILOs and what level their

performance is in those ILOs. performance is in those ILOs.

.. Should be appropriately designed or selected to address the Should be appropriately designed or selected to address the ILOs that we want to assess.ILOs that we want to assess.

.. Different assessment methods (tasks) address different ILOsDifferent assessment methods (tasks) address different ILOsThere should therefore be several kinds of task.There should therefore be several kinds of task.

.. Provide the evidence allowing teachers to make a judgment Provide the evidence allowing teachers to make a judgment about the level of a student’s performance against the ILOs about the level of a student’s performance against the ILOs and to awardand to award a final grade. a final grade.

Page 22: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Constructive Alignment ofConstructive Alignment ofILOs and Assessment TasksILOs and Assessment Tasks

Subject ILO 5

Subject ILO 4

Subject ILO 3

Subject ILO 2

Subject ILO 1

AT 3

AT 2

AT 1 Assessment Tasks

Subject ILOs

Consider if : all ILOs are being addressed? there is a balanced coverage of the ILOs? the more important ILOs are given appropriate assessment emphasis.

Page 23: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Designing Assessment Tasks (ATs)Designing Assessment Tasks (ATs)

Steps:Steps:

1.1. Select a practicable task that embodies the target Select a practicable task that embodies the target ILO verb. (Try using the TLA as an AT first).ILO verb. (Try using the TLA as an AT first).

2.2. Make a judgment on how well the ILO has been Make a judgment on how well the ILO has been met by the students' performance in the ATs – met by the students' performance in the ATs – developing grading criteria (rubrics).developing grading criteria (rubrics).

Page 24: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

A range of different assessment tasks may be required to A range of different assessment tasks may be required to address the range of ILOs of a subject.address the range of ILOs of a subject.

Questions to be asked in selecting assessment tasks:Questions to be asked in selecting assessment tasks:

11. Are the assessment tasks aligned to their appropriate . Are the assessment tasks aligned to their appropriate ILOs? Are the students required to engage in the verbs ILOs? Are the students required to engage in the verbs identified in the ILOs? identified in the ILOs?2. Are the assessment tasks practicable with respect to 2. Are the assessment tasks practicable with respect to available time and resources? available time and resources?3. Do the assessment tasks reflect the relative importance 3. Do the assessment tasks reflect the relative importance of the subject ILOs?of the subject ILOs?4. Is the assessment workload realistic for teachers and 4. Is the assessment workload realistic for teachers and

students? students?

Selecting Assessment TasksSelecting Assessment Tasks

Page 25: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Common ILOs Common ILOs Possible Assessment TasksPossible Assessment TasksDescribeDescribe Assignment, essay question examAssignment, essay question exam

ExplainExplain Assignment, essay question exam, Assignment, essay question exam, oral presentationoral presentation

IntegrateIntegrate Project, assignmentProject, assignment

AnalyseAnalyse Case study, assignmentCase study, assignment

ApplyApply Project, case study, experimentProject, case study, experiment

Solve problemSolve problem Case study, project, experimentCase study, project, experiment

Design, createDesign, create Project, experiment, posterProject, experiment, poster

ReflectReflect Reflective diary, portfolio,Reflective diary, portfolio,self-assessmentself-assessment

CommunicateCommunicate A range of oral, writing or listening A range of oral, writing or listening tasks addressing the ILOs, e.g. tasks addressing the ILOs, e.g.

presentation, debate, role play, presentation, debate, role play, reporting, assignment, reporting, assignment, précis, précis, paraphrasing, paraphrasing, answering questions etc. answering questions etc.

Page 26: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Examination is a very commonly used assessment task Examination is a very commonly used assessment task especially for large classes. We need to consider ifespecially for large classes. We need to consider if

1.1. examinations involving answering essay type of questions examinations involving answering essay type of questions under invigilated conditions are able to assess students' under invigilated conditions are able to assess students' performance in some high level ILOs, e.g. apply, reflect, performance in some high level ILOs, e.g. apply, reflect, create etc.create etc.

2.2. there are other alternative assessments tasks which will there are other alternative assessments tasks which will more appropriately address those high level ILOs.more appropriately address those high level ILOs.

If we must have an invigilated “exam”:If we must have an invigilated “exam”: Note that there are better formats than the conventional Note that there are better formats than the conventional

written essays; for example gobbets, critical incidents (e.g. written essays; for example gobbets, critical incidents (e.g. comment on a video segment), letter-to-a-friend, and so on.comment on a video segment), letter-to-a-friend, and so on.

Consider if the weighting (usually 50% or more) is Consider if the weighting (usually 50% or more) is appropriate to reflect the relative importance of the ILOs appropriate to reflect the relative importance of the ILOs being addressed.being addressed.

Page 27: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Assessments Tasks for Large ClassesAssessments Tasks for Large Classes

Some ATsSome ATs Useful forUseful for

ExamExam Ensuring work is student’s own, mostly multistructural Ensuring work is student’s own, mostly multistructural ILOs ILOs

Multiple choiceMultiple choice Recognition, strategy, coverageRecognition, strategy, coverage Ordered outcomeOrdered outcome Hierarchies of understandingHierarchies of understanding PosterPoster Integration, application, creativityIntegration, application, creativity Concept maps, Concept maps, Coverage, relationshipsCoverage, relationships

Venn diagramsVenn diagrams Three minute essayThree minute essay Different levels of understanding, sense of relevanceDifferent levels of understanding, sense of relevance GobbetsGobbets Interpret significant detail, explainInterpret significant detail, explain Short answerShort answer Recall units of information, coverageRecall units of information, coverage Letter-to-a-friendLetter-to-a-friend Integration, application, reflectionIntegration, application, reflection

Page 28: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Implementing Constructive Alignment in Implementing Constructive Alignment in Learning, Teaching and AssessmentLearning, Teaching and Assessment

ILO: What the

studenthas to learn

Teaching:Engaging the student in the

verb in the ILO

Assessment:How well

the student has achieved

the ILO

Page 29: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Using a Venn DiagramUsing a Venn Diagram

1

24

3

psychologist student

school

Give examples of Give examples of interactions at:interactions at:

1.1.

2.2.

3.3.

4.4.

Page 30: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Activity 4 – Designing Assessment TasksActivity 4 – Designing Assessment TasksRefer to one of the subject intended learning outcomes Refer to one of the subject intended learning outcomes

you have written in Activity 2, design assessment you have written in Activity 2, design assessment task(s) to address this ILO. task(s) to address this ILO.

Subject ILO: Subject ILO:

Now double-check if the student activities are aligned to the Now double-check if the student activities are aligned to the verb(s) nominated in the subject ILO.verb(s) nominated in the subject ILO.

Share your ideas with your colleagues.Share your ideas with your colleagues.

Assessment TaskAssessment Task Student activities to complete the taskStudent activities to complete the task

Page 31: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Assessing by marks or grades?Assessing by marks or grades?

Page 32: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Assessing by MarksAssessing by Marks

For:For:

.. Used to it.Used to it.

.. Seems to be the logical way to assess in certain subjects.Seems to be the logical way to assess in certain subjects.

.. Logistically easy.Logistically easy.

Against:Against:

.. Defines quality in terms of accumulating small quantities.Defines quality in terms of accumulating small quantities.

. . Measurement error also accumulates, thus invalidating fine Measurement error also accumulates, thus invalidating fine discriminations. E.g. there is no valid difference between discriminations. E.g. there is no valid difference between

7474 and 75, yet to the student it can make a BIG difference - and 75, yet to the student it can make a BIG difference - an HD or a D! Or worse, the difference between pass or fail.an HD or a D! Or worse, the difference between pass or fail... Sends undesirable messages to students (backwash).Sends undesirable messages to students (backwash).

Page 33: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Assessing by GradesAssessing by Grades

For:For:

• Student’s performance is appropriately assessed against Student’s performance is appropriately assessed against what they are intended to learn – what they are intended to learn – criterion-referenced.criterion-referenced.

• Backwash is positive.Backwash is positive.• The final grade tells students what they have achieved and The final grade tells students what they have achieved and

what they need for a better grade.what they need for a better grade.

Against:Against:

• Requires a different mind set for some teachers.Requires a different mind set for some teachers.• Initially more work in designing suitable assessment tasks Initially more work in designing suitable assessment tasks

and grading criteria, but once established there is no and grading criteria, but once established there is no extra work.extra work.

Page 34: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Qualitative assessment involves making Qualitative assessment involves making judgment against criteria judgment against criteria ((rubricsrubrics), not ), not by counting ‘marksby counting ‘marks’’

If ILOs are to reflect workplace or ‘real If ILOs are to reflect workplace or ‘real world’ standards it is not appropriate to world’ standards it is not appropriate to state and assess them in terms of marks state and assess them in terms of marks obtained. obtained.

Assessment tasks should likewise reflect Assessment tasks should likewise reflect the ‘real world’ ILOs.the ‘real world’ ILOs.

Page 35: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Grading Criteria Grading Criteria (rubrics)(rubrics)

ILOILO Assessment taskAssessment task

Page 36: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Example of Grading Criteria for ILOsExample of Grading Criteria for ILOs PassPass Satisfactory Satisfactory Good Good Excellent Excellent DD D+ D+ C- C C+ C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+ B- B B+ A- A A+

1.00 1.301.00 1.30 1.70 2.00 2.30 2.70 3.00 3.301.70 2.00 2.30 2.70 3.00 3.30 3.70 4.00 4.30 3.70 4.00 4.30

ILOsILOs ExplainExplain Able to identify and brieflyAble to identify and briefly Able to identify a numberAble to identify a number Able to identify a fullAble to identify a full As in “Good” but As in “Good” but

write about limited points.write about limited points. relevant points with some relevant points with some range of relevant range of relevant provides views on provides views onVery little evidence of Very little evidence of details. Uses these points details. Uses these points Points with details. Points with details. possible alternative possible alternativeusing these points to using these points to to provide a fair reasoning to provide a fair reasoning Supported by relevant Supported by relevant causes and/or results causes and/or resultsprovide reasoning to provide reasoning to or causality. No evidence or causality. No evidence literature. Points are literature. Points are under under

changing changing why they are inter- why they are inter- of a comprehensive of a comprehensive organized to provide a organized to provide a conditions. conditions. Able to Able to

related. related. overview of reasoning overview of reasoning comprehensive and comprehensive and link current link current or causality.or causality. cohesive reasoning or cohesive reasoning or reasoning to reasoning to

causality. causality. situations in real- situations in real- life professional life professional

contexts. contexts.

ReflectReflect Able to use Able to use availableavailable Able to use available Able to use available Able to use available Able to use available As in “Good”. Able As in “Good”. Able information to self- information to self- information to self- information to self- information to self- information to self- to generalize self-to generalize self-

evaluate and identify evaluate and identify evaluate and identify evaluate and identify evaluate and identify evaluate and identify evaluation to beyond evaluation to beyond limited aspects of own more aspects of own limited aspects of own more aspects of own the full range of own the full range of own existing context. existing context. strengths and weaknesses strengths and weaknesses strengths and weaknesses strengths and weaknesses strengths and weak- strengths and weak- Suggest ways of Suggest ways of in a general sense. No in a general sense. Little in a general sense. No in a general sense. Little nesses. Self-evaluation nesses. Self-evaluation improving perform-improving perform- evidence of suggestions application of theory in evidence of suggestions application of theory in is based on theory. is based on theory. ance to real-life ance to real-life of ways to improve self-evaluation and limited of ways to improve self-evaluation and limited Increasingly able to Increasingly able to professional professional performance. No evidence suggestions of ways to performance. No evidence suggestions of ways to suggest ways tosuggest ways to contest. contest. of theory being used in improve performance. of theory being used in improve performance. improve performance improve performance

self-evaluation. self-evaluation. in a specific context. in a specific context.

Page 37: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Holistic Grading of Assessment Tasks Holistic Grading of Assessment Tasks (e.g. a portfolio)(e.g. a portfolio)

MarginalMarginal AdequateAdequate Good Good ExcellentExcellent DD D+ D+ C- C C+ C- C C+ B- B B+ A- A A+ B- B B+ A- A A+ 1.00 1.301.00 1.30 1.70 2.00 2.30 2.70 3.00 3.30 1.70 2.00 2.30 2.70 3.00 3.30 3.70 4.00 4.30 3.70 4.00 4.30

The pieces of evidenceThe pieces of evidence The evidence is relevant,The evidence is relevant, The evidence presents a As in “B” but with The evidence presents a As in “B” but with are relevant and are relevant and accurate and covers good appreciation of higher degree of accurate and covers good appreciation of higher degree of accurate, but are accurate, but are several aspects of the the general thrust of the originality andseveral aspects of the the general thrust of the originality and isolated, addressing isolated, addressing course. Little evidence of course. Good coverage evidence of inter-course. Little evidence of course. Good coverage evidence of inter- one aspect of the one aspect of the an overall view of the with relevant and nalization intoan overall view of the with relevant and nalization into course. Demonstration course. Demonstration course. Demonstrates accurate support. A clear personalized model course. Demonstrates accurate support. A clear personalized model of understanding in a of understanding in a declarative understanding view of how various of practice. Gooddeclarative understanding view of how various of practice. Good minimally acceptable minimally acceptable of a reasonable amount of aspects of the course evidence of reflect-of a reasonable amount of aspects of the course evidence of reflect- way. Poor coverage, no way. Poor coverage, no content. Able to discuss integrate to form a ion on own content. Able to discuss integrate to form a ion on own originality, weak originality, weak content meaningfully. thrust or purpose. performance basedcontent meaningfully. thrust or purpose. performance based justification of portfolio justification of portfolio Good coverage but little Good evidence of on theory.Good coverage but little Good evidence of on theory. items. Inappropriate items. Inappropriate Application or integration. application of course Generalizes courseApplication or integration. application of course Generalizes course self-evaluation.self-evaluation. Fair justification of items. Content to practice. content to new and Fair justification of items. Content to practice. content to new and

Attempted realistic self- Portfolio items well unfamiliar real-Attempted realistic self- Portfolio items well unfamiliar real- evaluation.evaluation. justified. Realistic justified. Realistic life contexts. life contexts.

self-evaluation. self-evaluation.

Page 38: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Deriving a Final Grade (Quantitatively) Deriving a Final Grade (Quantitatively)

.. Award individual grades based on the grading Award individual grades based on the grading criteria.criteria.

.. Convert grades to numerals e.g. using the grade Convert grades to numerals e.g. using the grade point scale. point scale.

.. Combine (average) the individual grade points to Combine (average) the individual grade points to arrive at a final grade point.arrive at a final grade point.

.. Convert the final grade point back to a final grade.Convert the final grade point back to a final grade.

Page 39: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Deriving a Final Grade (Holistically) Deriving a Final Grade (Holistically)

Curriculum and Instruction: A subject in a course for Ed. Psychlsts. Curriculum and Instruction: A subject in a course for Ed. Psychlsts.

Grading will beGrading will be based on your attaining the following ILOsbased on your attaining the following ILOs

1. 1. Apply the principles of good teaching and assessment to chosen contexts.Apply the principles of good teaching and assessment to chosen contexts.2. 2. Relate selected aspects of curriculum design and management to the educational Relate selected aspects of curriculum design and management to the educational

system in Hong Kong.system in Hong Kong.3. 3. Apply the content and experiences in this subject to enhance your effectiveness as Apply the content and experiences in this subject to enhance your effectiveness as

an educational psychologist.an educational psychologist.4. Show examples of your reflective decision-making as an educational psychologist.4. Show examples of your reflective decision-making as an educational psychologist.

Final grades will depend on how well you can demonstrate that you have met all the Final grades will depend on how well you can demonstrate that you have met all the ILOs:ILOs:

A Awarded if you have clearly met all the ILOs, provide evidence of original and A Awarded if you have clearly met all the ILOs, provide evidence of original and creative thinking, perhaps going beyond established practice.creative thinking, perhaps going beyond established practice.B Awarded when all ILOs have been met very well and effectively.B Awarded when all ILOs have been met very well and effectively.C Awarded when the ILOs have been addressed satisfactorily, or where the evidence C Awarded when the ILOs have been addressed satisfactorily, or where the evidence

is strong in some ILOs, weaker but acceptable in others.is strong in some ILOs, weaker but acceptable in others.F Less than C, work plagiarised, not submitted.F Less than C, work plagiarised, not submitted.

Page 40: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

Activity 5Activity 5

Take a few minutes to reflect on the following:Take a few minutes to reflect on the following:

1.1. One important point that you have gained from this One important point that you have gained from this session.session.

2. One question you still have on designing 2. One question you still have on designing constructively aligned learning, teaching and constructively aligned learning, teaching and

assessment.assessment.

3.3. One action you will take in your future teaching and One action you will take in your future teaching and assessment based on the discussion of this session. assessment based on the discussion of this session.

Please share with us your reflection on the above issues.Please share with us your reflection on the above issues.

Page 41: John Biggs And Catherine Tang 2008

References References

Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (3rd Ed) (2007) . Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (3rd Ed) (2007) . Teaching for Teaching for Quality Learning at UniversityQuality Learning at University. Maidenhead: Open . Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw Hill. University Press/McGraw Hill.