Jets and QCD in D0 Experiment
-
Upload
eve-howell -
Category
Documents
-
view
25 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Jets and QCD in D0 Experiment
Jets and QCD inD0 Experiment
Physics at Extreme Energies
Hanoi, Vietnam July 23, 2000
V. Šimák
Institute of Physics ASCR, Prague
for the D Collaborations
Title:d0logo.epsCreator:CLARIS EPSF Export Filter V1.0Preview:This EPS picture was not savedwith a preview included in it.Comment:This EPS picture will print to aPostScript printer, but not toother types of printers.
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 2
Outline
• Inclusive Jet Cross Section :– at 1800 GeV
– at630 GeV
– Ratio of Inclusive Jet Cross Sections
• Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section
• Dijet Mass Spectrum
All theoretical
comparisons done
with JETRAD
ddE
dT
2
21
3
dddEd
T
anythingJ2)(J1
1P
2P
11Px
22Px
1jet
2jet
s
1/ xf Aa
2/ xf Bb
)(ˆ
jets) 2pp(
2/1/21
21
cdabxfxfdxdxabcd
BbAa
pp
ln [ tan (/ 2) ]
< 4.2 inttotal)
Transverse segmentationx x
Electrons: E / E = 15%
/
Pions: E / E = 45% /
p
_p
y
zx
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 4
Inclusive Jet Cross Section at s = 1800 GeV
±
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 5
Inclusive Jet Cross Section at s = 1800 GeV (D)
• JETRAD F= R= ETMax /2 ,
Rsep=1.3, for |||< 0.5|< 0.5
For all PDF’s probabilities
between 47-90%
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 6
Inclusive Jet Cross Section at s = 630 GeV
Ldt 536 nb-1
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 7
Inclusive Jet Cross Section at s = 630 GeV
• Some discrepancy at low ET, errors are large , but there is overall agreement.
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 8
Ratio of Inclusive Jet Cross Sections
Same discrepancy exists in ratio of the scaled cross sections.
QCD predictions seem to be 20% higher than expected.
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 9
Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section
1994-1995 Collider run (run 1b):
± 6 pb-1
preliminary resultsRequire at least two reconstructed
jetsTrigger Jet: ET > 60 GeV
Probe Jet : ET > 30 GeV
No restriction on additional jets.
Measurement as input to PDF’s:gluon distribution is most
interesting. Both experiments use JETRAD for
theoretical comparisons with different
PDF’s.
Ldt
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 10
Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (D)
• Divide data sample into four eta bins:
-- 0.0<||<0.5, 0.5<||<1.0, 1.0<||<1.5, 1.5<||<2.0
• Divide each eta bin into two subsamples:
-- events with 2 jets on the Opposite Side (OS)
-- events with 2 jets on the Same Side (SS).
• ET of both jets are measured so there are two entries per event into each of the eight the cross sections.
• JETRAD using = E/2
Note that the renormalization and factorization scale are chosen to be:
-- f = r = E/2 ( max jet )
OS SS
Beam line
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 11
Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (D)
0.0<||<0.5
0.5<||<1.0
1.0<||<1.5
1.5<||<2.0
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 12
Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (D) = ET/2
0.0<||<0.5
0.5<||<1.0
1.0<||<1.5
1.5<||<2.0
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 13
Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (D) = E/2
0.0<||<0.5
0.5<||<1.0
1.0<||<1.5
1.5<||<2.0
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 14
Dijet Triple Differential Cross Section (D) = E/2
0.0<||<0.5
0.5<||<1.0
1.0<||<1.5
1.5<||<2.0
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 15
Dijet Mass Distribution
M
M
. %
9% 100
4 5 1000
@
@
GeV
GeV
200-220 GeV: 8% Error
800-1400 GeV: 30% Error
Smeared CrossSectionUnsmeared
f M F M M M M dM
F M AMM
sB
C
,
where
1
121221
1221
cos11
cos1
iiiiii
i
iiii
EEEEM
M
EEM
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 16
“Typical DØ Dijet Event”
ET,1 = 475 GeV, 1 = -0.69, x1=0.66ET,2 = 472 GeV, 2 = 0.69, x2=0.66
MJJ = 1.18 TeVQ2 = ET,1×ET,2=2.2x105 GeV2
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 17
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 19
Ra
RRa
RRR
La
LRa
RRL
Ra
RLa
LLR
La
LLa
LLL
RRRRRRLLRRRL
RRLLLRLLLLLL
qqqq
qqqq
qqqq
qqqq
qqqqqqqq
qqqqqqqq
L
22
22
22
224
1
1
1
1
00
00
2
A
V
1
0
Axial
:1
Vector
:1
nsinteractio o:
nsinteractiosinglet :
XRL
XLR
XRR
XLL
XRL
XLR
XRR
XLL
XX
XX
ctet
M cos
2ˆ
s
s
Compositeness Contact Predictions
QCD +
Hanoi, July 23, 2000
V. Šimák 20
TeV
TeV
TeV NLO
LO
LO
X
Compositeness CalculationsEichten et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 56, 579 (84) Eichten et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 50, 811 (83)Chivukula et al., Phys. Lett. B 380, 92 (96)Lee, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2591 (97)Lane, hep-ph/9605257 (96)Suggested Scale: 1.6 TeV (LL) PRL 77, 438(1996)
TeV 4.2 TeV 7.2
Conclusions
1800 Inclusive Cross Sec.
No significant excess
Excellent agreement with theory630 Inclusive Cross Sec.
NLO predictions ~20% high
Experimental measurements consistent
Ratios 630/1800
NLO predictions ~20% high.
Experimental measurements consistent
Triple Differential Cross Section:
NLO QCD with recent PDF’s (CTEQ3M, CTEQ4M, CTEQ4HJ, MRST,…) with agreement
with D0 within the systematic uncertainties
Cross sections for possible inputs to PDF’s
1800 Dijet Mass
NLO QCD in agreement with the data
Compositeness Scale > 2.4 TeV
no new physics so farno new physics so far
Title:d0logo.epsCreator:CLARIS EPSF Export Filter V1.0Preview:This EPS picture was not savedwith a preview included in it.Comment:This EPS picture will print to aPostScript printer, but not toother types of printers.