Jeffco Public Schools · Mesa K6 . 568 Students . $20 Million . Open 2018 . COPs/Bond . Ralston...
Transcript of Jeffco Public Schools · Mesa K6 . 568 Students . $20 Million . Open 2018 . COPs/Bond . Ralston...
-
12/17/2015
Our Goal is to provide the Best Learning Environment for our Students, the Best Teaching Environment for our Staff
Jeffco Public Schools
Board of Education Study Session Facility Portfolio, Planning, Enrollment, Growth
& Needs December 17, 2015
-
Discussion Topics
I. Facility Portfolio
II. District-Wide Facility Master Plan Process
III. Enrollment
IV. Urgent Needs/Solutions
V. Summary
VI. Questions
2
-
Portfolio Summary • 12 Million Square Feet of Facilities
• 3,100 Acres of Land
• 168 Campuses with 384 Permanent Buildings
• 328 Modular Buildings, 12 Cottage Buildings
• Average Age 40 years; Median Age 44 years
• Average Facility Condition Index 19.6
• Annual Maintenance & Operation Budget $51M
• Annual Capital Investment $21M
3
-
Facility Portfolio by Age
Pre 1926 1946 - 1965 1966 - 1985 1986 - 1995 1996 - 2005 2006 - 2012Square Feet 9,481 4,095,094 3,861,262 1,903,753 1,385,291 619,720
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
4,500,000
Tot
al S
quar
e Fe
et
67% of Jeffco Schools’ Facility Square Footage Constructed Prior to 1986
4
-
Facility Condition Index (FCI)
• Real Estate Industry Standard Terminology
• Divides the Repair Cost by the Replacement Cost to Derive a Benchmark Indicator
• FCI • Less than 5%: Best • 6% to 10%: Good • 11% to 20%: Average • 21% to 30%: Below Average • 31% to 50% Poor • 51% to 65%: Very Poor • Greater than 65%: Replacement Candidate
5
-
FCI & Jeffco Facilities
Jeffco’s Average FCI Approximately 19.6% • Total Building Condition Needs $445.5 million
• Building Condition (Priority 1 – 5) $323.6 million • Educational Adequacy $121.9 million
• 5-Year Life Cycle Forecast Needs $371.9
million (Combined Jeffco & CDE Statewide Assessment Data)
Total Need $788.7 million 6
-
Building Condition Assessment Criteria Five Priorities for Facilities Needs • Priority 1: Mission Critical Concerns (Current)
• Deficiencies or conditions that directly affect the school's ability to remain open, or deliver the educational curriculum, e.g. items related to buildings safety, severely damaged or failing building components.
• Priority 2: Indirect Impact to Educational Mission (1 Year) • Items that if not addressed in the near term may progress to a priority one item. Example, poor
roofs that allowed to deteriorate further will cause damage to other building systems.
• Priority 3: Short Term Conditions (2-3 Years) • Needs that are necessary to the mission of the school, but may not require immediate attention.
Priority three items can include additions to schools, site improvements, and improvements to other important systems.
• Priority 4: Long Term Requirements (3-5 Years) • Items or systems which are likely to require attention within the next five years, or would be
considered an enhancement to the instructional environment. Examples include cabinets, finishes, paving, removal or abandoned equipment, and educational enhancement associated with special programs.
• Priority 5: Enhancements • These items are needs that are aesthetic in nature or considered enhancements. 7
-
Building Condition Assessment Criteria
Value of Outstanding Deficiencies by Priority
8
-
Building Condition Assessment Criteria Educational Adequacy Needs • Compares all Schools to the district standards • Supports School Replacement Decisions
• Some items CAN be Repaired or Corrected • Some Items CANNOT be Corrected
• Total Educational Adequacy Deficiencies 121.9million • 27% of Total Current Need
9
-
Building Condition Assessment Criteria Educational Adequacy Categories • Capacity (Classroom, Library, Cafeteria, Administration & Site) • Support for Programs (Classrooms Types) • Technology (Technology Infrastructure Support) • Security and Supervision • Instructional Aids (Teacher Support Equipment) • Physical Characteristics (Size and Shape) • Learning Environment (Lighting, Noise, Odors, A/C) • Relationship of Spaces (Facility Locations On Site)
10
-
Building Condition Assessment Criteria Value of Current Educational Adequacy Deficiencies by Category
11
-
Lifecycle Tracking Purpose • All Building Systems and Components have an
Expected Life Expectancy. • Tracking of Systems Using Industry Standard
Methodology. • Tracking Covers a Five-Year Period. • Twelve Industry-Standard Building Systems are
Followed. • Current Lifecycle Needs - $371.9 million.
12
-
Space Inventory & Value
Total Replacement Value Approx. $2.4 Billion
District Facilities by Type
School/Facility Type Campuses Count Sq Ft Count Sq Ft Count Sq Ft
Pre-K Centers 5 3 34,122 6 20,614 0 -
Elementary Schools 93 141 4,482,100 - - 237 234,426
K-8 Schools 3 4 263,091 - - 1 1,008
Middle Schools 17 38 1,817,299 - - 12 12,824
Junior/Senior Schools 2 2 354,949 5 4,800
High Schools 15 41 3,337,648 - - 13 14,914
Districtwide / Option 14 96 903,710 1 3,310 28 28,600
Stadia 4 27 31,458 - - 2 1,920
Administrative 11 23 403,576 3 10,173 0 -
Maintenance and Transportation 5 9 43,102 - - 4 3,894
Decommissioned 0 0 - 2 5,179 31 26,844
Total 169 384 11,671,055 12 39,276 333 329,230 0.3% 2.7%
Permanent Buildings Transportable BuildingsCottage Buildings
13
Sheet1
Portfolio Stats
District Facilities by Type
Permanent BuildingsCottage BuildingsTransportable Buildings
School/Facility TypeCampusesCountSq FtCountSq FtCountSq Ft
CampusCount5678
Pre-K Centers5334,122620,6140- 0
Elementary Schools931414,482,100- 0- 0237234,426
K-8 Schools34263,091- 0- 011,008
Middle Schools17381,817,299- 0- 01212,824
Junior/Senior Schools22354,94954,800
High Schools15413,337,648- 0- 01314,914
Districtwide / Option1496903,71013,3102828,600
Stadia42731,458- 0- 021,920
Administrative1123403,576310,1730- 0
Maintenance and Transportation5943,102- 0- 043,894
Decommissioned00- 025,1793126,844
MBC0- 0
Total16938411,671,0551239,276333329,230
0.3%2.7%
Sheet2
Sheet3
-
12/17/2015
Our Goal is to provide the Best Learning Environment for our Students, the Best Teaching Environment for our Staff
Jeffco Public Schools
District Wide Facility Master Plan Process
-
Facilities Management Model
Financial Analysis
Taxpayer & Community Input
Sound Instruction for All Students
Facilities Solutions
15
-
Master Plan Goals • BOE Establishes Guidelines
• Develop Set of Parameters to Establish Planning Criteria • Consistent Application of Rules
• Staff Defines & Recommends Goals • Optimal Use of our Existing Facilities • Balance Articulation Areas • Right Sizing Square Footage Portfolio • Equitable Distribution Center Programs • Financing Approach and Schedule
• Internal / External Review • Cabinet, Capital Asset Advisory Committee, Financial Oversight Committee • Board of Education, Public Presentations
16
-
Guidelines for BOE Consideration
• School Consolidations • Move Students into nearby Existing School • Construct new School and Consolidate Two into One.
• School Closures • Politically Charged Issue • Selection Criteria / Community Involvement / Support
• Boundary Changes • Community Involvement • Lengthy Process Initially and to Fully Implement
• New Construction • New Buildings – Lengthy Process, Cost • Additions & Renovations 17
-
Guidelines for BOE Consideration cont.
• Grade Configurations • Flexibility, Impact on Utilization
• Repurpose Existing Facilities • Function Change e.g. School to Support Type Facility or
Community Use • School Type / Program or Curriculum Change
• Facility Share • Neighborhood & Charter • Charter & Option
• Explore Finance Options • Bonds, Certificates of Participation (COPs), Leases, Cash 18
-
Staff Develops Recommendations • Method:
• Objectivity – based on data; FCI, Utilization, Enrollment Trends
• Parameters – work within Planning Parameters
• Consistency in Approach
• Acknowledge & Validate Previous Commitments, Boundary Realignment, Closures, Consolidations & Replacements, Athletic Fields, Preschools
• Optimal School Size & Location don’t Over/Under Build.
• Growth Areas – Immediate Need vs. Long Range
• Flexible Grade Configurations
• Community, Stakeholder Participation
• Creativity in establishing solutions
19
-
Facility Master Plan Process
STAFF COLLECTS AND EVALUATES DATA
STAFF MAKES RECOMMENDATIONS
TO THE BOARD
BOARD DEFINES PARAMETERS
STAFF ESTABLISHES GOALS
BOARD CONFIRMS GOALS
STAFF CREATES MASTER PLAN
20
-
12/17/2015
Our Goal is to provide the Best Learning Environment for our Students, the Best Teaching Environment for our Staff
Jeffco Public Schools
Enrollment
-
Overview • Enrollment by Geographic Area
• High Growth – North County & Along Highway 93, Central Lakewood, Edgewater
• Moderate Growth - West Lakewood (Solterra) • Stable Growth – West Area • Slow / No Growth – Pockets in North and South County
• Reasons • Economic and Population Growth • Improving Real Estate Market
• Future • 2013 Saw First Increase in Birthrate since 2006 • Increase in Property Sales, Decrease in Foreclosures, Increased
Availability of Affordable Housing in Established Neighborhoods 22
-
North County • Ralston Valley - Growing
• Meiklejohn ES: Five Parks, Candelas & Leyden Rock Developments
• West Woods ES: Highway 93, Candelas • Sierra ES: Spillover from Meiklejohn
• Pomona – Stable/Growing • PHS: Growth, Moore MS, Decline
• Standley Lake – Stable/Growing • SLHS: Due to IB; STEM Program Options • Sheridan Green: PreK Program
• Arvada West - Growing • Fairmount ES: Highway 93; Indiana St. Development • Vanderhoof ES: From West Woods, Meiklejohn, PreK • Drake MS: Growth from Feeder Schools
23
-
North County Elementary Schools
24
-
North County Middle Schools
25
-
North County High Schools
26
-
• Alameda – Stable, Better Utilization • Alameda HS 7-12 - Conversion • Stein ES Move to O’Connell reopen 2017, Demographic
Changes, High Mobility • Arvada - Declining
• Arvada HS - High ‘Choice Out’ • Foster ES, Hackberry Hill (ES), Arvada K8 - Continued Growth • North Arvada MS - Declining
• Jefferson – Stable Better Utilization • Jefferson 7-12 – Conversion, Better Utilization/Under Enrolled • Stevens Relocation to WRMS - Better Utilization • Edgewater ES, Molholm ES, Lumberg ES - Continued Growth;
Over-enrolled.
Central Area
27
-
• Green Mountain - Increasing • Devinny ES, Green Mtn. ES, Rooney Ranch ES - Over-
enrolled, Solterra, Neighborhood Turnover • Lakewood - Stable
• Lakewood HS - High ‘Choice In’ • Eiber ES, Belmar ES - Over-enrolled
• Golden - Increasing • Kyffin ES - Over-enrolled, High ‘Choice In’ • Mitchell 2013-14 6th Grade to Bell MS Stable/Growing • Bell MS - Increasing Due to 6th Grade & STEM
• Wheat Ridge – Stable/Growing • Everitt MS; WRHS – Solid Growth; Most ES – Growth • Stober, Prospect Valley, Kullerstrand ES – Over-Enrolled • Choice In from Jefferson to Everitt, WRHS
Central Area (cont.)
28
-
Central Area Elementary Schools
29
-
Central Area Middle Schools
30
-
Central Area High Schools
31
-
• Bear Creek - Declining • Red Rocks ES, Very High ‘Choice In’ • Westgate ES, Demographic/Neighborhood Changes • Bear Creek K8, Very High ‘Choice In’
• Chatfield - Stable • Coronado ES, High ‘Choice In’ • Shaffer ES, Stony Creek ES, Neighborhood, Low ‘Choice In’ • Deer Creek MS, Very Low Utilization
• Columbine – Stable/Declining • Dutch Creek ES, High ‘Choice Out’, Demographics • Normandy ES, High ‘Choice In’
• Dakota Ridge – Stable/Declining • Powderhorn ES, Mt. Carbon ES, Westridge ES - High Utilization • Summit Ridge, Approaching Capacity • Colorow ES, Significantly Under Utilized
South County
32
-
South County Elementary Schools
33
-
South County Middle Schools
34
-
South County High Schools
35
-
• Conifer – Stable/Growing • West Jeff ES – Over-Enrolled • Balance of Facilities – Under-Utilized
• Evergreen – Stable/Growing • Parmalee ES – Over-enrolled • Bergen Valley ES – Significantly Under-Utilized • Balance of Facilities – Under-Utilized
West County
36
-
12/17/2015
Our Goal is to provide the Best Learning Environment for our Students, the Best Teaching Environment for our Staff
Jeffco Public Schools
Urgent Needs/Solutions
-
Residential Growth 2004-2015
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Uni
ts
Building Permits in Jefferson County Multi-Family
Single-Family
Jan
- S
ept
38
-
Projected Student Growth – North County
39
-
Projected Student Growth S. Lakewood
40
-
Urgent Needs
Candelas K8 800 Students $25 Million Open 2017
COPs
Sierra Phase II K6
768 Students $15 Million Open 2017
COPs
Table Rock Mesa K6
568 Students $20 Million Open 2018 COPs/Bond
Ralston Valley HS Wing 3
400 Students $8 Million
Open 2018-19 Bond
Leyden Rock 568 Students $25 Million
Open 2018-19 Bond
Coyote Gulch K6
568 Students $20 Million
Open 2018-19 Bond
Bond
COPs Urgent Needs
$15 Million
41
-
Candelas PK-8 800, Expand to 1,000 Students
Construct New PK8 • Schools listed Serve NW Area • No Effect upon 2015-16 or 2016-17 Enrollment • Planned opening Fall 2017 • No Temps closed, 2016 – 5 Temps added to both
Meiklejohn & WWES. 2017 - 8 Temps Closed WWES, 5 closed Meiklejohn; Sites with In-Use Temps-Mitchell (3), Stott (2), Vanderhoof (2), Van Arsdale (3).
• May require 2-3 years to achieve the desired enrollment transitions between schools.
• Boundary Changes to West Woods, Meiklejohn. • Distribute Meiklejohn PreK to Van Arsdale
(2015), New PK8 (2017)
• Provides Relief & Additional Capacity to schools serving Leyden Rock, Candelas and West Woods.
• Project Cost $25M, 24 Months Construction; Cost per Student $31,250 (2015 Dollars)
Drake MS
Fairmount
Mitchell
Meiklejohn
Oberon MS
Stott
Candelas K8-800 Capacity
Vanderhoof
Van Arsdale
Wayne Carle MS
West Woods
Not Impacted by K8
42
-
Table Rock Mesa PK-6 768 Students
Construct New PK6 • Schools listed Serve NW Area. • No Effect upon 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18
Enrollment.
• Open Fall 2018 • 5 New Temps Meiklejohn & West Woods (2016);
2017 Sites with Temps: Meiklejohn (5), Stott (2), Van Arsdale (3), West Woods (2). 2017 – 6 Temps Closed, 10 Temps In-Use.
• May require 2-3 years to achieve the desired enrollment transitions between schools.
• Primary Boundary Changes to Fairmount, Mitchell, West Woods.
• Distribute Meiklejohn PreK to Stott (2016), New PK8 (2017), Van Arsdale (2015)
• Provides Relief & Additional Capacity to Hwy. 93 Corridor and In-fill Projects.
• Project Cost $22M, Cost per Student $28,650, 24 Months Design/Construction (2015 Dollars)
Drake MS
Fairmount
Mitchell
Meiklejohn
Oberon MS
Stott
Table Rock Mesa PK-6 768 Capacity
Vanderhoof
Van Arsdale
Wayne Carle MS
West Woods
Not Impacted by PK-6
43
-
Sierra ES – Phase II ~ 250 Additional Seats (768 total)
Construct Sierra Phase II • Schools listed are impacted by Phase II • No Effect upon 2015-16 Enrollment, No Temps
closed or mothballed in 2015-16.
• Complete Fall 2017. • May require 2-3 years to achieve the desired
enrollment transitions between schools.
• Boundary Changes to Sierra, Meiklejohn, Fremont, Van Arsdale.
• 11 Temps Closed or Mothballed in 2016-17 • Project Cost $15M, Cost per Student $60,000, 24
Months Design/Construction (2015 Dollars)
Fremont ES
Meiklejohn ES
Sierra ES Phase II – 250 Addl. Seats
Stott ES
Van Arsdale ES
Vanderhoof ES
West Woods ES
44
-
Recommendations with Minimal Capital Investment
• Grade Configurations • Flexibility, Impact on Utilization
• Temporary Classrooms • Busing changes • Boundary Changes • Year Round School • Split Sessions • Repurpose Existing Facilities
• Function Change e.g. School to Support Type Facility or Community Use
• School Type / Program or Curriculum Change • Facility Share
• Neighborhood & Charter • Charter & Option 45
-
Recommendations with Capital Investment • Additions • Replacement/Consolidations • New Buildings • Grade Reconfigurations w/Additions • Major Renovations
46
-
Sources of Significant Capital
• Certificates of Participation • Finance device that uses existing facilities as
collateral. • General Fund Payments • COPs incorporated in a bond program and paid
off when the bond passes. • General Obligation Bonds
• Voter Approval required • Paid from Tax Revenue over Long Period of Time
47
-
What We Need From BOE
1. Reconsideration of PK-8 vs. K6 at Candelas Site? 2. Direction on Phase II Sierra ES 3. Direction on Finance Options
1. Direction on Capital Bond Program 2. Certificates of Participation (COPs)
4. BOE Guidelines Direction 5. Direction on Development of District Wide Facility
Master Plan.
48
-
Time is of the Essence
• Deal with Current Enrollment Pressures • No Apparent Slowdown in Residential Development • Prepare for Capital Bond? • Take Advantage of Currently Favorable Interest
Rates. • Construction Inflation is 5%+ Annually, on a $25M
project equates to $1.25M Loss in Purchasing Power.
49
-
Questions?
50
Jeffco Public Schools Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Jeffco Public Schools Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Slide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Jeffco Public Schools Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Slide Number 28Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Slide Number 31Slide Number 32Slide Number 33Slide Number 34Slide Number 35Slide Number 36Jeffco Public Schools Slide Number 38Slide Number 39Slide Number 40Slide Number 41Slide Number 42Slide Number 43Slide Number 44Slide Number 45Slide Number 46Slide Number 47Slide Number 48Slide Number 49Slide Number 50