Jean baudrillard
description
Transcript of Jean baudrillard
![Page 1: Jean baudrillard](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022073013/546ce6b5af79595e658b5ca3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Jean Baudrillard
![Page 2: Jean baudrillard](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022073013/546ce6b5af79595e658b5ca3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Baudrillard• Jean Baudrillard was a French sociologist,
philosopher, cultural theorist, political commentator, and photographer.
• His work is frequently associated with postmodernism and specifically post-structuralism.
![Page 3: Jean baudrillard](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022073013/546ce6b5af79595e658b5ca3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Work• Baudrillard was a social theorist and critic best
known for his analyses of the modes of mediation and technological communication.
• His writing, though mostly concerned with the way technological progress affects social change, covers diverse subjects — including consumerism, gender relations, the social understanding of history, journalistic commentaries about AIDS, cloning, the Rushdie affair, the first Gulf War, and the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City.
![Page 4: Jean baudrillard](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022073013/546ce6b5af79595e658b5ca3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Significance in Words• His published work emerged as part of a generation of French thinkers
including Gilles Deleuze, Jean-François Lyotard, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, and Jacques Lacan who all shared an interest in semiotics, and he is often seen as a part of the poststructuralist philosophical school.
• In common with many poststructuralists, his arguments consistently draw upon the notion that signification and meaning are both only understandable in terms of how particular words or "signs" interrelate. Baudrillard thought, as do many post-structuralists, that meaning is brought about through systems of signs working together.
• Following on from the structuralist linguist Ferdinand de Saussure, Baudrillard argued that meaning (value) is created through difference - through what something is not (so "dog" means "dog" because it is not-"cat", not-"goat", not-"tree", etc.).
• In fact, he viewed meaning as near enough self-referential: objects, images of objects, words and signs are situated in a web of meaning; one object's meaning is only understandable through its relation to the meaning of other objects; in other words, one thing's prestige relates to another's mundanity.
![Page 5: Jean baudrillard](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022073013/546ce6b5af79595e658b5ca3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Human Society• From this starting point Baudrillard constructed broad theories of human society based upon
this kind of self-referentiality. His pictures of society portray societies always searching for a sense of meaning — or a "total" understanding of the world — that remains consistently elusive.
• In contrast to poststructuralists such as Foucault, for whom the formations of knowledge emerge only as the result of relations of power, Baudrillard developed theories in which the excessive, fruitless search for total knowledge lead almost inevitably to a kind of delusion.
• In Baudrillard's view, the (human) subject may try to understand the (non-human) object, but because the object can only be understood according to what it signifies (and because the process of signification immediately involves a web of other signs from which it is distinguished) this never produces the desired results.
• The subject, rather, becomes seduced (in the original Latin sense, seducere, to lead away) by the object. He therefore argued that, in the last analysis, a complete understanding of the minutiae of human life is impossible, and when people are seduced into thinking otherwise they become drawn toward a "simulated" version of reality, or, to use one of his neologisms, a state of "hyperreality.“
• This is not to say that the world becomes unreal, but rather that the faster and more comprehensively societies begin to bring reality together into one supposedly coherent picture, the more insecure and unstable it looks and the more fearful societies become.
Reality, in this sense, "dies out."