Item #6 517 Alta
-
Upload
marian-vargas-mendoza -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
46 -
download
0
Transcript of Item #6 517 Alta
Case # 630FSignificance & Compatibility
Review517 Alta
Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director
City Council MeetingAgenda Item #6
September 12, 2016
CASE NO. 630F Consider a request of Nic Abbey LuxuryHomes, owner, for the significance andcompatibility review of the proposed mainstructure located at 517 Alta underDemolition Review Ordinance No. 1860(April 12, 2010) to demolish 100% of theexisting main structure in order to constructa new single family residence with detachedaccessory structure.
SUMMARY The applicant is seeking to demolish
100% of the existing main structure inorder to construct a new single familyresidence with detached accessorystructure.
4
BACKGROUND
Zoned SF-A North side of Alta, between La Jara &
Woodway. Significance Review was approved by the
ARB on 11/18/14 and by Council on12/18/14.
5
BACKGROUND
Council tabled the case until September12, 2016 to give the applicant & adjacentland owners the opportunity to discussissues.
On Monday August 29th City staff metwith the applicant & the legalrepresentative for the Fitzsimons.
6
CONCERNS
Size of the home and the setback of thedetached garage.
Vegetative screening along the rearproperty line.
Privacy issues (line of site from secondstory into rear yard.
Tree Removal (with warranty of other trees) Privacy Fence
7
CONCERNS ADDRESSED
Home Size/Setbacks No modification Setback of current accessory
structure is the same as theproposed accessory structure.
8
CONCERNS ADDRESSED
Vegetative Screening Screening provided along rear property
line (applicants side). Garage area not included as area is
utilized for drainage. Proposed vegetation of Cherry Laurel
(5), or clumping bamboo (6), orJapanese Yew (6).
9
10
CONCERNS ADDRESSED
Privacy Issues Line of sight not provided Most likely view of backyard would be
visible from 2nd story windows. Minimal view as only 2 windows for light on
2nd story. The proposed windows would be
approximately 50’ from the rear propertyline.
11
12
CONCERNS ADDRESSED
Tree Removal 27” Oak collapsed during heavy rain
around August 20th. No mitigation required for diseased or
collapsed trees. Tree is leaning on existing fences and
deck (hazardous).
13
CONCERNS ADDRESSED
Tree Removal Onsite mitigation - (2) 6.5” cal. Live
Oak or Southern Magnolia and (3) 6.5”cal. Cedar Elms.
32 inches total to be mitigated on site
14
15
CONCERNS ADDRESSED
Tree Removal (Warranty Remaining Trees) Stump Grinding would not be utilized as
roots of Fitzsimons’ trees may beintertwined.
Fitzsimons’ tree is currently showingsigns of stress.
No warranty provided. Not required bycode.
16
CONCERNS ADDRESSED
Privacy Fence Updated site plan does not show
requested 8’ privacy fence.
17
18
COLLAPSED TREE
19
COLLAPSED TREE
20
COLLAPSED TREE
21
COLLAPSEDTREE
22
COLLAPSEDTREE
QUESTIONS?