Issues and Options Consultation Responses - Aireborough HMCA SHLAA RefSAP … IandO... · 2017. 9....

Issues and Options Consultation Responses - Aireborough HMCA

SHLAA RefSAP Ref. Nature of comment Broad topic Detailed topic No. of responsesResponse Action

12 HG2-11 Anti development Environment Conservation/Heritage 1 Noted.

Policy P11 of the Core Strategy, and N14 to N20 of the UDP will require development to conserve and enhance the historic environment. Guidance is also provided as part of the generic considerations outlined under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP.

Impact on area character 1

Noted. Consideration of these factors has taken place as part of the site assessment and selection process. This site is considered suitable for allocation.

Policies P10 (Design) and P12 (Landscape) of the Core Strategy will be used to ensure that the design and landscaping of new development reflects the character of the surrounding area. Policy P11 of the Core Strategy, and N14 to N20 of the UDP will require development to conserve and enhance the historic environment. Guidance is also provided as part of the generic considerations outlined under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP.

Highways Access 3

Highways Officers have assessed all sites and detailed transport modelling has been undertaken of proposed allocations to establish any strategic and detailed highway improvements required. This work has informed both the initial selection of sites and the detailed site and off site requirements for each allocation and has influenced decisions as to phasing of housing allocations. Further detail is provided in the Infrastructure Background Paper.

As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, further consideration of highways issues will be made at Planning Application Stage. Core Strategy Policy T2 requires sites with significant trip generating uses will need to complete Transport Assessments. Developer contributions may be required towards off site highway works, as well as cycling, walking and public transport provision.

Public transport 1



Other None 1 n/a n/aPro development Highways Parking/access 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Housing Issues Viable/available/suitable/doable 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other General support 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

34 HG1-96 Anti development Housing Issues Cumulative impact 1

The site has planning permission. Detailed consideration of issues including design, landscaping and historic environment is undertaken as part of the planning application process.

n/a

Pro development Other None 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Neutral Phasing long 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. All identified sites are in Phase 1 for release, in accordance with Core Strategy Policy H1.

63 (blank) Anti development EnvironmentLoss of greenspace/green corridor

1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Access 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Traffic/Congestion 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Pro development Other General support 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.





Loss of greenspace/green corridor

1

This site is not identified as Green Space (i.e. publically accessible space with recreation or nature conservation value) in the existing Unitary Development Plan.

n/a

Visual impact 1


Policies P10 (Design) and P12 (Landscape) of the Core Strategy will be used to ensure that the design and landscaping of new development reflects the character of the surrounding area.

Pro development Other General infrastructure 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

271 HG1-6 Pro development Other National/local policy 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

734 HG1-1 Anti development Environment Green Belt 1


n/a

Other Lack of consultation 1

The statutory planning application process for this site has already been undertaken. Further consultation is also being undertaken as part of the Site Allocations Plan which has to go through various stages of preparation. An 8 week consultation took place on the Issues and Options version of the Site Allocations Plan. Further details are provided in the Report of Consultation.

Further public consultation will be undertaken on the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

None 1


n/a

Pro development Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Use of brownfield site 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other Sustainable 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

741 HG1-10 Anti development Environment Agricultural land 1


n/a

Conservation/Heritage 3


n/a

Flooding/drainage 2


n/a





n/a



n/a


1


n/a

Overdevelopment 3


n/a

Utilities pipelines/pylons etc

1


n/a

Visual impact 2


n/a

Wildlife/biodiversity impact 1


n/a

Highways Safety 2

Transport and highways issues are a consideration through the planning application process. Highways officers have undertaken detailed transport modelling of existing identified sites (sites with planning permission and UDP allocations) and proposed allocations to establish any strategic and detailed highway improvements required. This work has informed both the initial selection of sites and the detailed site and off site requirements for each allocation and has influenced decisions as to phasing of housing allocations. Further detail is provided in the Infrastructure Background Paper.

n/a



741 HG1-10 Anti development Highways Traffic/Congestion 6


n/a

Housing Issues Already enough housing 1


n/a

Brownfield first 6


n/a

Cumulative impact 2


n/a

Urban sprawl 4


n/a

Other General infrastructure 1


n/a

Lack of consultation 3

The statutory planning application process for this site has already been undertaken. Further consultation is also being undertaken as part of the


National/local policy 1


n/a



741 HG1-10 Anti development Schools/Health/Community GP/Dentist full 5

The impact on local services (eg schools provision) has been undertaken as part of the planning application process for this site. From the early stages of the SAP preparation, Leeds City Council’s Children’s Services have been involved in the consideration and evaluation of housing sites. Further detail is provided in the Infrastructure Background Paper.

n/a

Lack of facilities/shops 2


n/a

Schools full 5


n/a



n/a

Housing Issues Brownfield first 1


n/a

Pro development Other General support 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

1017 (blank) Pro development Environment No impact on flood risk/drainage 1 Noted

On balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

Housing Issues Need more affordable housing 1 Noted


1103 (blank) Anti development Other General infrastructure 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Neutral Phasing short 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.1104 (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 10 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Conservation/Heritage 124 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



1104 (blank) Anti development Environment Flooding/drainage 5 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Green Belt 142 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Greenfield 68 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Impact on area character 43 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



Noise 10 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Overdevelopment 31 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Pollution 19 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Remain PAS/return to green belt


Sustainability 5 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Trees 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Utilities pipelines/pylons etc


Visual impact 25 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Wildlife/biodiversity impact 77 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Access 15 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Parking 6 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Public transport 15 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Safety 36 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Housing Issues Already enough housing 10 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Brownfield first 107 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Cumulative impact 51 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Distribution housing figure 5 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Empty properties 17 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

House prices 6 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Local employment 6 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Overall housing figure 9 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Scale/site size 4 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Urban sprawl 71 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other Alternative approach 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

General infrastructure 9 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Lack of consultation 37 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

National/local policy 4 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

None 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



1104 (blank) Anti development Schools/Health/Community Community 33 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Crime 4 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Distance to GP/Dentist 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Emergency services 20 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

GP/Dentist full 119 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Lack of facilities/shops 32 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Pressure on local services 74 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Quality of life 15 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Refuse 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Schools full 140 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Pro development Environment No harm to green belt/countryside 1 Noted


No harm to historic environment 1 Noted


No merging of settlements 1 Noted


Rounding off 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

Highways Additional traffic is OK 1 Noted


Parking/access 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

Public transport 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

Housing Issues Housing supply/growth 1 Noted


More suitable than other sites 2 Noted


Viable/available/suitable/doable 1 Noted


Other General infrastructure 2 Noted


General support 3 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

National/local policy 1 Noted




1113 HG2-6 Anti development EnvironmentLoss of greenspace/green corridor

30 Noted Site specific requirements for this site include the requirement that half the site is laid out for allotments.

Overdevelopment 1


As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, landscaping schemes will be required for development adjoining open Land or Green Belt, in accordance with UDP Policy N24 and Supplementary Planning Guidance note 25 (Greening the built edge).


Wildlife/biodiversity impact 2 Noted.

Policy G9 of the Core Strategy will require biodiversity improvements as part of new developments.

As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP ,where a site contains trees (including Tree Preservation Orders), woodland or hedgerows these should be retained where possible in any detailed design proposals for development.

Highways Access 2


Spatial Policy 1 of the Core Strategy identifies that the majority of new development will be concentrated within and adjacent to urban areas, where it can take advantage of existing services and high levels of accessibility. The largest amount of development will be located in the Main Urban Area and Major Settlements. Smaller Settlements will also contribute to development needs, with the scale of growth having regard to the settlements size, function and sustainability.

Parking 1


The Infrastructure Background Paper provides further detail on how the infrastructure requirements arising from the proposed allocations have been identified and taken into account.

Public transport 1









New housing is required to meet the future needs of the Leeds District. The housing requirement for each Housing Market Character Area is set by Spatial Policy 7 of the Core Strategy, which was adopted by the Council in November 2014 following a separate public consultation and independent examination process.

n/a

Cumulative impact 1




Other Covenants 2 Noted n/aNone 1 n/a n/a

Schools/Health/Community Community 1 Noted. Policy P10 (Design) of the Core Strategy will require all developments to protect the visual, residential

and general amenity of the area.

GP/Dentist full 2 Noted.

The Site Allocations Plan cannot allocate land specifically for health facilities because providers plan for their own operating needs and local demand. However, in accordance with Core Strategy policy P9, developers will be encouraged to consult with the relevant Clinical Commissioning Group to ensure consideration of health provision in association with proposed developments.

Pressure on local services 1

Guiseley/Yeadon/Rawdon is identified in the Core Strategy Settlement Hierarchy as a Major Settlement.



Schools full 2

From the early stages of the SAP preparation, Leeds City Council’s Children’s Services have been involved in the consideration and evaluation of housing sites. Further detail is provided in the Infrastructure Background Paper.

Site HG2-5 will contain a new school to help meet demand in this area.



1113 HG2-6 Pro development Environment Environ/social/econ benefits 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Improve appearance of site 3 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

No harm to green belt/countryside 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Additional traffic is OK 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Parking/access 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Viable/available/suitable/doable 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other General support 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

1148 (blank) Anti development Environment Conservation/Heritage 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Flooding/drainage 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Green Belt 70 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Impact on area character 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




Sustainability 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Wildlife/biodiversity impact 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




Brownfield first 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Coalescence 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



Other General infrastructure 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Schools/Health/Community Community 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Schools full 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





No impact on flood risk/drainage 1 Noted




1148 (blank) Pro development Environment No merging of settlements 1 Noted





Parking/access 2 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.


Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 1 Noted




Other General support 3 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.



Schools/Health/Community

Close to facilities/shops 2 Noted


Improve education 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

Will create services 1 Noted


1186 (blank) Pro development Other General support 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

1189 (blank) Pro development Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 1 Noted


Need more affordable housing 1 Noted



1194 (blank) Anti development Environment Green Belt 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Impact on area character 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Highways Safety 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




1194 (blank) Anti development Housing Issues Cumulative impact 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Urban sprawl 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




Schools/Health/CommunityImprove education 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

1199 (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 9


n/a

Airport 9


n/a



n/a

Flooding/drainage 823


n/a

Green Belt 28


n/a

Greenfield 11


n/a



n/a


115


n/a



1199 (blank) Anti development Environment Noise 37


n/a

Overdevelopment 89


n/a

Pollution 30


n/a

Remain PAS/return to green belt

48


n/a

Sustainability 56


n/a

Trees 1


n/a

Visual impact 17


n/a



n/a

Highways Access 272


n/a



1199 (blank) Anti development Highways Parking 182


n/a

Public transport 183


n/a

Safety 185


n/a



1199 (blank) Anti development Highways Traffic/Congestion 896


n/a



n/a

Brownfield first 131


n/a

Cumulative impact 5


n/a

Empty properties 51


n/a

House prices 16


n/a

Local employment 7


n/a

Overall housing figure 11


n/a

Scale/site size 1


n/a



1199 (blank) Anti development Housing Issues Urban sprawl 9


n/a

Other Already built 10The Plan covers the period between 2012 and 2028, and so development that has taken place since 2012 will be included in the plan.

n/a

Covenants 1


n/a

General infrastructure 175


n/a






n/a

Schools/Health/Community Crime 4


n/a

Distance to facilities/shops 2


n/a



1199 (blank) Anti development Schools/Health/Community

Distance to GP/Dentist 33


n/a

Distance to school 28


n/a

Emergency services 24


n/a

GP/Dentist full 753


n/a



n/a






n/a

Quality of life 14


n/a

Refuse 2


n/a

Schools full 858


n/a

Neutral Phasing not specified 9 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. All identified sites are in Phase 1 for release, in accordance with Core Strategy Policy H1.

Noted.

Part of this site is proposed for development in phase 2, and the remainder is identified for development. All identified sites are in Phase 1. As outlined in paragraphs 2.36 to 2.39 of the SAP, policy H1 of the Core Strategy sets out criteria for phasing the release of housing allocations. This has been applied through the SAP to ensure a 5 year supply is maintained and ensure a balance of brownfield and greenfield sites coming forward.

HG1-58 / HG2-29Pro development Environment No harm to green belt/countryside1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Sustainability 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Parking/access 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Public transport 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Housing Issues Housing supply/growth 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.More suitable than other sites2 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Need more affordable housing1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Viable/available/suitable/doable1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other General infrastructure 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


SHLAA RefSAP Ref. Nature of comment Broad topic Detailed topic No. of responsesResponse Action1199 HG1-58 / HG2-29Pro development Other National/local policy 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Sustainable 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Schools/Health/CommunityClose to facilities/shops1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Housing Suitable for elderly housing3 Noted.

Part of this site site is identified for development in the Publication Draft Site Allocations Plan as planning permission has already been granted. The mix and provision of housing for older persons on the site would be considered in accordance with Core Strategy policies H4 and H8 if revised plans for the site were submitted. In accordance with Policy H8 of the Core Strategy, the rest site has been allocated but is notspecifically identified as being suitable for older persons housing / independent living. Further information on the approach to identifying sites for older persons housing is provided in the Housing Background Paper. However, this does not mean that a proposal for older persons housing on this site would not be supported, and all developments will need to provide an appropriate housing mix in accordance with Core Strategy Policy H4.


To meet Leeds’ housing and employment requirements it will be necessary for some development to take place on agricultural land.

Regard has been had to the grade of Agricultural Land as part of the Green Belt site assessment and Sustainability Appraisal process.

Conservation/Heritage 115 Noted.


Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to Listed Buildings and the Nether Yeadon Conservation Area

Flooding/drainage 8Noted. The Site Assessment considers the Flood Zone (as defined by the Environment Agency) that each site is within.

Policy EN55 of the Core Strategy, and Policies Water 6 and 7 of the Natural Resources and Waste Local Plan will ensure that new development does not increase flood risk on or off site. Paragraph 2.51 of the SAP, and the Flood Risk Background Paper, provide further information on how flood risk has been taken into account and will be responded to.

Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to flood risk

Green Belt 130

To meet Leeds’ housing and employment requirements it will be necessary to take some land out of the Green Belt and allocate it for development up to 2028, or identify it as Safeguarded Land for longer term development.

All sites in the Green Belt have been assessed against the purposes of Green Belts set out in the National Planning Policy Framework to enable sites with the least harm on Green Belt purposes to be proposed for allocation. This reflects the needs and characteristics of the area concerned and other assessment considerations. Further detail is provided in the Green Belt Background Paper. This site has been assessed as being suitable for development.

Greenfield 70

In accordance with Policy H1 of the Core Strategy, Brownfield sites have been prioritised and it is expected that 57% of new houses will be on brownfield land. However, as the supply of brownfield land falls short of what is required to meet housing requirements, there will also be a need to allocate some greenfield sites for development.

All Brownfield sites are identified as Phase 1 sites to encourage their development in the first instance.








41


n/a

Noise 14Noise is not considered to represent an insurmountable constraint to development on this site.

As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, where a site is within 50m of an A road or rail line, or within 25m of a B road, and for any site within the city centre, a noise assessment is required.

Overdevelopment 36




Pollution 19 Noted.

As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, where a site is in close proximity to a major road (A road or motorway) an air quality assessment is required. Policy AIR1 (The management of air quality through development) of the adopted Natural Resources and Waste Local Plan also requires all applications for major development to incorporate low emission measures to ensure the overall impact of proposals on air quality is mitigated.

Sustainability 2 Noted. A Sustainability Appraisal has been prepared which considers all of the proposed allocations / rejected sites.

Trees 7 Noted.


As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP where a site contains trees (including Tree Preservation Orders), woodland or hedgerows these should be retained where possible in any detailed design proposals for development.


1Utilities infrastructure is not considered to represent an insurmountable constraint to development on this site.

n/a

Visual impact 17









1221 HG2-10 Anti development Highways Access 16



Parking 9



Public transport 16



Safety 30







As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, further consideration of highways issues will be made at Planning Application Stage. Core Strategy Policy T2 requires sites with significant trip generating uses will need to complete Transport Assessments. Developer contributions may be required towards off site highway works, as well as cycling, walking and public transport provision. The site requirements for this site identify that the development will be required to contribute to measures to mitigate the cumulative effect of the site on the local highway network.



n/a

Brownfield first 94



Coalescence 19

It is considered that the development of this site will not result in the merging or coalescence of Yeadon with a neighbouring settlement

n/a

Cumulative impact 66




Distribution housing figure 5


n/a



1221 HG2-10 Anti development Housing Issues Empty properties 22

The Council has a series of initiatives to encourage empty properties to be brought back into use. However, as the supply of empty homes falls short of what is required to meet housing requirements, there is a need to identify sites for new housing development.

n/a

House prices 8

National Planning Practice Guidance makes clear that the protection of purely private interests, such as the impact of a development on the value of a neighbouring property, is not a material planning consideration.

n/a

Local employment 8Guiseley/Yeadon/Rawdon is identified in the Core Strategy Settlement Hierarchy as a Major Settlement.





n/a

Scale/site size 6




Urban sprawl 50






1221 HG2-10 Anti development Other Alternative approach 2

Noted. All sites put forward have been assessed using the same assessment process. The Housing and Employment Background Papers provide a summary of the key reasons why specific sites have been selected or rejected for allocation.

n/a






The Site Allocations Plan has to go through various stages of preparation. An 8 week consultation took place on the Issues and Options version of the Site Allocations Plan. Further details are provided in the Report of Consultation.



Noted. The Site Allocations Plan has been prepared in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the guidance of the national Planning Practice Guidance (PPG).

n/a

None 1 n/a n/aSchools/Health/Community Community 43 Noted. Policy P10 (Design) of the Core Strategy will require all developments to protect the visual, residential


Crime 4 Noted. Policy P10 (Design) of the Core Strategy will require all developments to ensure that they create a safe and secure environment that reduces the opportunities for crime.

Distance to GP/Dentist 5 Noted.










1221 HG2-10 Anti development Schools/Health/Community









Quality of life 16 Noted. Policy P10 (Design) of the Core Strategy will require all developments to protect the visual, residential and general amenity of the area.

Refuse 1 Noted. Policy P10 of the Core Strategy will require that waste and recycling storage should be designed in a positive manner and be integral to the development.

Schools full 133



Pro development Environment Environ/social/econ benefits 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Highways Public transport 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Housing Issues Viable/available/suitable/doable 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other General support 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Schools/Health/Community

Close to facilities/shops 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Improve education 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Neutral Phasing medium 1 Noted.

This site is proposed for development in phase 2. As outlined in paragraphs 2.36 to 2.39 of the SAP, policy H1 of the Core Strategy sets out criteria for phasing the release of housing allocations. This has been applied through the SAP to ensure a 5 year supply is maintained and ensure a balance of brownfield and greenfield sites coming forward.

not specified 1 Noted.


1256 (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Conservation/Heritage 4 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



SHLAA RefSAP Ref. Nature of comment Broad topic Detailed topic No. of responsesResponse Action1256 (blank) Anti development Environment Green Belt 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Impact on area character 5 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




Highways Access 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Parking 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Safety 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Housing Issues Brownfield first 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




None 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Schools/Health/Community GP/Dentist full 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Pro development Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 50 Noted







n/a



n/a

Flooding/drainage 2


n/a

Green Belt 15


n/a



1308 HG1-12 Anti development Environment Greenfield 17


n/a



n/a


8


n/a

Noise 6


n/a

Overdevelopment 4


n/a

Pollution 2


n/a

Sustainability 1


n/a


1


n/a

Visual impact 1


n/a



n/a





n/a

Parking 1


n/a

Public transport 4


n/a



1308 HG1-12 Anti development Highways Safety 9


n/a

Traffic/Congestion 55


n/a



n/a

Brownfield first 18


n/a

Cumulative impact 7


n/a



n/a



1308 HG1-12 Anti development Housing Issues House prices 4


n/a

Local employment 2


n/a



n/a

Urban sprawl 7


n/a

Other Alternative approach 12


n/a



n/a




None 1


n/a

Schools/Health/Community Community 10


n/a



1308 HG1-12 Anti development Schools/Health/Community Crime 2


n/a

Distance to school 1


n/a



n/a

GP/Dentist full 17


n/a



n/a






n/a

Quality of life 4


n/a

Refuse 1


n/a

Schools full 21


n/a

Pro development Environment Improve appearance of site 3 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Parking/access 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Public transport 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 3 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Use of brownfield site 8 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other General support 11 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.None 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Sustainable 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Housing Suitable for elderly housing2 Noted

This site is identified for development in the Publication Draft Site Allocations Plan as planning permission has already been granted. . The mix and provision of housing for older persons on the site would be considered in accordance with Core Strategy policies H4 and H8 if revised plans for the site were submitted.



1308 HG1-12 Neutral Phasing long 1 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. All identified sites are in Phase 1 for release, in accordance with Core Strategy Policy H1.

short 4 Noted Site is identified for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. All identified sites are in Phase 1 for release, in accordance with Core Strategy Policy H1.

1326 (blank) Anti development Other Alternative approach 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Pro development Environment No impact on flood risk/drainage 1 Noted


Housing Issues Need more affordable housing 1 Noted








Sustainability 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Visual impact 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Wildlife/biodiversity impact 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Access 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Safety 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Housing Issues Cumulative impact 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.








Highways Parking/access 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.






2038 (blank) Pro development Housing Issues Use of brownfield site 77 Noted



None 2 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

Neutral Phasing medium 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.2118 (blank) Anti development Environment Airport 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Impact on area character 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





Sustainability 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Highways Safety 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.






Pro development Highways Public transport 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.






Noise 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Wildlife/biodiversity impact 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Traffic/Congestion 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Housing Issues Urban sprawl 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.







Quality of life 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Schools full 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Pro development Environment Contribute to improving POS 1 Noted


Environ/social/econ benefits 1 Noted


Sustainability 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.







Sustainable 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.




2160 (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Airport 10 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Conservation/Heritage 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.












2160 (blank) Anti development Housing Issues Already enough housing 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





None 80 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Schools/Health/Community Community 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Distance to facilities/shops 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

GP/Dentist full 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Pressure on local services 6 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Pro development Environment Environ/social/econ benefits 1 Noted




Highways Public transport 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.



Use of brownfield site 1 Noted






2161 (blank) Anti development Environment Airport 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Conservation/Heritage 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Wildlife/biodiversity impact 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Public transport 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.







SHLAA RefSAP Ref. Nature of comment Broad topic Detailed topic No. of responsesResponse Action2162 (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 11 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Airport 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Conservation/Heritage 120 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.







Pollution 16 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Sustainability 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Trees 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Utilities pipelines/pylons etc






Brownfield first 107 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Coalescence 61 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




House prices 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.










2162 (blank) Anti development Schools/Health/Community Community 47 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Crime 4 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Distance to facilities/shops 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Distance to school 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




Quality of life 24 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Refuse 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Schools full 142 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Pro development Environment Low ecological value 1 Noted


No harm to green belt/countryside 1 Noted























Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to the Guiseley Conservation Area




Green Belt 113



Greenfield 1








3


n/a

Overdevelopment 26






3026 HG2-1 Anti development Environment Pollution 1 Noted.



Visual impact 5







Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to ecology.

Highways Access 73



Parking 6





3026 HG2-1 Anti development Highways Public transport 76



Safety 1






The site requirements for this site identify that the development will be required to contribute to measures to mitigate the cumulative effect of the site on the local highway network.



n/a

Brownfield first 1





3026 HG2-1 Anti development Housing Issues Coalescence 8

It is considered that the development of this site will not result in the merging or coalescence of Guiseley with a neighbouring settlement.

n/a

Cumulative impact 26









n/a

Scale/site size 1




Urban sprawl 108






3026 HG2-1 Anti development Other Alternative approach 1


n/a







n/a

None 1 n/a n/aOther 1 Noted n/aSustainability appraisal 1 Noted A Sustainability Appraisal has been prepared which considers all of the proposed allocations / rejected

sites.

Schools/Health/Community Distance to school 1


Site HG2-5 will contain a new of school to help meet demand in this area.








Schools full 98


Site HG2-5 will contain a new of school to help meet demand in this area.



3026 HG2-1 Pro development Environment Environ/social/econ benefits 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Low ecological value 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


No impact on flood risk/drainage 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

No merging of settlements 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Sustainability 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Parking/access 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Public transport 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Use of brownfield site 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Viable/available/suitable/doable 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other General infrastructure 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

General support 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.National/local policy 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

None 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Sustainable 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




This site has not been specifically identified as being suitable for older persons housing / independent living. Further information on the approach to identifying sites for older persons housing is provided in the Housing Background Paper. However, this does not mean that a proposal for older persons housing on this site would not be supported, and all developments will need to provide an appropriate housing mix in accordance with Core Strategy Policy H4.

3028 (blank) Anti development Environment Flooding/drainage 57 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.






Highways Access 8 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Parking 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Public transport 5 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



3028 (blank) Anti development Highways Traffic/Congestion 57 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Coalescence 52 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.












Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to the Guiseley Conservation Area




Green Belt 7









3029 HG2-2 Anti development Environment Wildlife/biodiversity impact 1 Noted.



Highways Parking 1


As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, further consideration of highways issues will be made at Planning Application Stage. Core Strategy Policy T2 requires sites with significant trip generating uses will need to complete Transport Assessments. Developer contributions may be required towards off site highway works, as well as cycling, walking and public transport provision. The site requirements for this site identify that provision should be made for improved highway access to the site.

Public transport 1



Safety 1









3029 HG2-2 Anti development Housing Issues Brownfield first 1



Urban sprawl 1








None 1 n/a n/aPro development Highways Public transport 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Other None 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.3030 (blank) Anti development Environment Airport 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





Pollution 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Traffic/Congestion 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Housing Issues Overall housing figure 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


None 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Schools/Health/Community Schools full 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





3030 (blank) Pro development Environment No impact on flood risk/drainage 1 Noted







Other Sustainable 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

Schools/Health/CommunityClose to facilities/shops 1 Noted


3031 (blank) Anti development Environment Green Belt 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Greenfield 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Wildlife/biodiversity impact 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Public transport 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




Pro development Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 1 Noted


Other Sustainable 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.




Housing Suitable for elderly housing1 Noted Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.3033 (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 5 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.








Pollution 6 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Sustainability 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Trees 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



3033 (blank) Anti development EnvironmentUtilities pipelines/pylons etc














None 4 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Schools/Health/Community Community 14 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Crime 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Distance to facilities/shops 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.






Pro development Highways Public transport 1 NotedOn balance, other sites are considered to be more appropriate for development to meet Core Strategy requirements and so this site is not proposed for allocation. The reasons for rejection are summarised in the housing and employment background papers.

3034 (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Green Belt 12 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Impact on area character 6 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.




SHLAA RefSAP Ref. Nature of comment Broad topic Detailed topic No. of responsesResponse Action3034 (blank) Anti development Environment Pollution 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Highways Access 8 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Public transport 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Safety 7 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



Coalescence 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Urban sprawl 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other None 9 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Schools/Health/Community Community 6 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Distance to facilities/shops 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Distance to GP/Dentist 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.










Neutral Phasing short 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



n/a

Greenfield 1


n/a





n/a



n/a



n/a

Brownfield first 1


n/a

Other Lack of consultation 1






n/a






n/a

3326 (blank) Anti development Environment Airport 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Conservation/Heritage 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.







Highways Public transport 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Safety 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



Coalescence 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Distribution housing figure 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





Lack of facilities/shops 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



Pro development Environment Contribute to improving POS 1 Noted


Environ/social/econ benefits 1 Noted




3326 (blank) Pro development Environment Improve appearance of site 1 Noted


Low ecological value 1 Noted





















3329 (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 9 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.


The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Flooding/drainage 17 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Green Belt 60 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Greenfield 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Impact on area character 30 Noted.



12 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.



3329 (blank) Anti development Environment Mining 11 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Noise 8 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Overdevelopment 9 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Pollution 18 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.



Sustainability 6 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.



Visual impact 4 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.



Highways Access 24 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Parking 11 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Public transport 13 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Safety 31 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Traffic/Congestion 93 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Housing Issues Already enough housing 1 Noted.


Brownfield first 24 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Coalescence 29 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Cumulative impact 3 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.



3329 (blank) Anti development Housing Issues Distribution housing figure 1 Noted.


House prices 4 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Local employment 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Overall housing figure 1 Noted.


Urban sprawl 46 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Other General infrastructure 23 Noted.


Lack of consultation 1 Noted.


National/local policy 4 Noted.


None 5 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Schools/Health/Community Community 4 Noted.


Crime 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Distance to facilities/shops 1 Noted.


GP/Dentist full 21 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Lack of facilities/shops 10 Noted.


Pressure on local services 23 Noted.


Quality of life 36 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Schools full 36 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Neutral Phasing not specified 1 NotedThe site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.



3329 HG2-4 (part)Pro development Other None 3 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

HG3-4 Pro development Housing Suitable for elderly housing2 NotedThe site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

3331 HG3-3 Anti development Environment Agricultural land 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.






Impact on area character 21 Noted.




Mining 5 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.




Sustainability 9 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.









3331 HG3-3 Anti development Highways Parking 8 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.









Distribution housing figure 1 Noted.






Site boundary 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.


Other Alternative approach 1 Noted.


General infrastructure 24 Noted.








3331 HG3-3 Anti development Other None 5 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.



Distance to school 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.








Pro development Environment No merging of settlements 1 Noted.


Highways Parking/access 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.


Housing Issues Housing supply/growth 1 Noted.


More suitable than other sites 2 Noted.


Other General support 3 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.


Housing Suitable for elderly housing1 NotedThe site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Neutral Phasing not specified 1 NotedThe site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.






3366 HG2-9 Anti development Environment Airport 11The airport is not considered to represent an insurmountable constraint to development on this site.

Site requirements for this site identify the need to give specific consideration at the planning application stage to aircraft noise mitigation.



Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to Listed Buildings / the Conservation Area




Green Belt 6








2


n/a


Consideration should be given at the planning application stage to aircraft noise mitigation (particularly in bedrooms), for example by means of enhanced glazing for habitable rooms, alternative means of ventilation, and an enhanced roof specification as appropriate, such that the internal noise standards of BS 8233 can be achieved.

Overdevelopment 1




Pollution 7 Noted.




3366 HG2-9 Anti development Environment Visual impact 2






As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP where a site contains trees (including Tree Preservation Orders), woodland or hedgerows these should be retained where possible in any detailed design proposals for development. Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to ecology.

Highways Access 5


As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, further consideration of highways issues will be made at Planning Application Stage. Core Strategy Policy T2 requires sites with significant trip generating uses will need to complete Transport Assessments. Developer contributions may be required towards off site highway works, as well as cycling, walking and public transport provision. The site requirements for this identify that provision should be made for improved highway access to the site.





Housing Issues Brownfield first 3



Coalescence 1

It is considered that the development of this site will not result in the merging or coalescence of XX with a neighbouring settlement.

n/a



3366 HG2-9 Anti development Housing Issues Distribution housing figure 1


n/a

House prices 3


n/a



n/a

Scale/site size 1











None 4 n/a n/aSchools/Health/Community Quality of life 1 Noted. Policy P10 (Design) of the Core Strategy will require all developments to protect the visual, residential




3366 HG2-9 Anti development Schools/Health/Community Schools full 2


It is expected that school capacity issues could be resolving using the existing school estate.

Pro development Environment No harm to green belt/countryside 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Rounding off 3 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



Need more affordable housing 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other General support 3 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Sustainable 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

4019 HG2-8 Anti development Other None 1 n/a n/aPro development Highways Public transport 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Use of brownfield site 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other General support 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Schools/Health/Community



This site has not been specifically identified as being suitable for older persons housing / independent living. Further information on the approach to identifying sites for older persons housing is provided in the Housing Background Paper. However, this does not mean that a proposal for older persons housing on this site would not be supported, and all developments will need to provide an appropriate housing mix in accordance with Core Strategy Policy H4.

Neutral Phasing long 1 Noted.

This site is proposed for development in phase 1 As outlined in paragraphs 2.36 to 2.39 of the SAP, policy H1 of the Core Strategy sets out criteria for phasing the release of housing allocations. This has been applied through the SAP to ensure a 5 year supply is maintained and ensure a balance of brownfield and greenfield sites coming forward.

short 1 Noted.


not specified 1 Noted.






Policy EN55 of the Core Strategy, and Policies Water 6 and 7 of the Natural Resources and Waste Local Plan will ensure that new development does not increase flood risk on or off site. Paragraph 2.51 of the SAP, and the Flood Risk Background Paper, provide further information on how flood risk has been taken into account and will be responded to.Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to flood risk






Greenfield 1








1


n/a

Mining 1 Former mining use is not an insurmountable constraint to development. If necessary, a detailed site survey will be required at application stage.

Overdevelopment 1






n/a

Visual impact 9






4020 HG2-4 Anti development Environment Wildlife/biodiversity impact 4 Noted.



Highways Access 13



The site requirements for this site identify that provision should be made for improved highway access to the site.

Public transport 1



Safety 2









4020 HG2-4 Anti development Housing Issues Brownfield first 3



Cumulative impact 1






n/a

House prices 7


n/a



The Infrastructure Background Paper provides further detail on how the infrastructure requirements arising from the proposed allocations have been identified and taken into account



n/a



4020 HG2-4 Anti development Housing Issues Urban sprawl 4







The Infrastructure Background Paper provides further detail on how the infrastructure requirements arising from the proposed allocations have been identified and taken into account




None 6 n/a n/a







Neutral Phasing not specified 1 Noted.



















Housing Issues Brownfield first 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.



Distribution housing figure 3 Noted.






Scale/site size 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.




4043 HG3-1 Anti development Other General infrastructure 12 Noted.



Sustainability appraisal 1 Noted.


Schools/Health/Community Distance to school 6 Noted.









Pro development Highways Public transport 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 2 Noted.


Neutral Phasing short 2 NotedThe site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.


Airport 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.








4095 HG3-2 Anti development Environment Impact on area character 8 Noted.




Mining 9 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.




Trees 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

















4095 HG3-2 Anti development Housing Issues Distribution housing figure 6 Noted.






Scale/site size 2 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.


Other Alternative approach 1 Noted.


General infrastructure 30 Noted.







Sustainability appraisal 2 Noted.




Crime 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Distance to school 2 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.








4095 HG3-2 Anti development Schools/Health/Community Quality of life 14 Noted.



Pro development Environment Low ecological value 1 Noted.


No merging of settlements 1 Noted.


Rounding off 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Highways Additional traffic is OK 1 Noted.


Parking/access 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.


Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 3 Noted.


Other General support 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Sustainable 1 Noted.The site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Housing Suitable for elderly housing1 NotedThe site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

Neutral Phasing long 1 NotedThe site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

not specified 1 NotedThe site is not required to meet the overall housing requirement over the plan period. There are other more suitable alternative sites preferred for allocation. The site contributes to a reserve of land with potential for longer term development.

1180A (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 1





Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to Listed Buildings and the Guiseley Conservation Area.



1180A (blank) Anti development Environment Green Belt 8








2


n/a

Overdevelopment 2




Trees 1 Noted.



Visual impact 1









1180A (blank) Anti development Highways Access 9


As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, further consideration of highways issues will be made at Planning Application Stage. Core Strategy Policy T2 requires sites with significant trip generating uses will need to complete Transport Assessments. Developer contributions may be required towards off site highway works, as well as cycling, walking and public transport provision.The site requirements for this site identify that provision should be made for improved highway access to the site.

Public transport 1


As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, further consideration of highways issues will be made at Planning Application Stage. Core Strategy Policy T2 requires sites with significant trip generating uses will need to complete Transport Assessments. Developer contributions may be required towards off site highway works, as well as cycling, walking and public transport provision. The site requirements for this site identify that provision should be made for improved access to public transport

Safety 1





As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, further consideration of highways issues will be made at Planning Application Stage. Core Strategy Policy T2 requires sites with significant trip generating uses will need to complete Transport Assessments. Developer contributions may be required towards off site highway works, as well as cycling, walking and public transport provision.The site requirements for this site identify that the development will be required to contribute to measures to mitigate the cumulative effect of the site on the local highway network.

Housing Issues Coalescence 1


n/a



1180A (blank) Anti development Housing Issues Cumulative impact 4









n/a

Urban sprawl 5






n/a






SHLAA RefSAP Ref. Nature of comment Broad topic Detailed topic No. of responsesResponse Action1180A (blank) Anti development Other None 1 n/a n/a










Schools full 2


The site requirements for this site identify that the provision should be made for a school within site HG2-5 which this site forms part of. This is also shown on the Plan.

Neutral Phasing short 2 Noted.


HG2-5 (part)Pro development Environment Contribute to improving POS1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Environ/social/econ benefits1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.No harm to green belt/countryside2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.No merging of settlements1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Sustainability 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Highways Public transport 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Housing Issues More suitable than other sites1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Viable/available/suitable/doable2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Other National/local policy 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Schools/Health/CommunityClose to facilities/shops2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

1180B (blank) Anti development Environment Conservation/Heritage 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





Housing Issues Scale/site size 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





1180B (blank) Pro development Environment No harm to green belt/countryside 2 Noted
















Neutral Phasing short 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.1255A (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 5 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.















1255A (blank) Anti development Housing Issues Empty properties 2 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.






None 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Schools/Health/Community

























Will create services 1 Noted



SHLAA RefSAP Ref. Nature of comment Broad topic Detailed topic No. of responsesResponse Action1255A (blank) Neutral Phasing short 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

1255B HG2-3 Anti development Environment Agricultural land 7



Airport 7The airport is not considered to represent an insurmountable constraint to development on this site.

n/a





Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to flood risk.

Green Belt 14



Greenfield 5







4


n/a


n/a

Overdevelopment 7




Tourism 1Development on this site is not considered likely to adversely affect tourism to the wider area.

n/a



1255B HG2-3 Anti development EnvironmentUtilities pipelines/pylons etc


n/a

Visual impact 9



Wildlife/biodiversity impact 16 Noted. Policies P10 (Design) and P12 (Landscape) of the Core Strategy will be used to ensure that the

design and landscaping of new development reflects the character of the surrounding area.

Highways Access 16




Parking 5



Public transport 1





1255B HG2-3 Anti development Highways Safety 8









n/a

Brownfield first 9



Coalescence 3


n/a

Cumulative impact 7





1255B HG2-3 Anti development Housing Issues Empty properties 3

The Council has a series of initiatives to encourage empty properties to be brought back into use. However, as the supply of empty homes falls short of what is required to meet housing requirements, there is a need to identify sites for new housing development.

n/a

House prices 2


n/a



n/a

Scale/site size 1



Urban sprawl 6





n/a

General infrastructure 2 Yeadon/Guiseley/Rawdon is identified in the

Core Strategy Settlement








1255B HG2-3 Anti development Other National/local policy 4


n/a



Emergency services 5 Yeadon/Guiseley/Rawdon is identified in the






Lack of facilities/shops 2 Yeadon/Guiseley/Rawdon is identified in the




Pressure on local services 10 Yeadon/Guiseley/Rawdon is identified in the





Schools full 15



Pro development Environment No impact on flood risk/drainage 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Rounding off 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



1255B HG2-3 Pro development Housing Issues More suitable than other sites 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Other General infrastructure 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

General support 2 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.



medium 1 Noted.


1311A (blank) Anti development Environment Agricultural land 1





Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to Listed Buildings and the Guiseley Conservation Area




Green Belt 8



Greenfield 1






Policies P10 (Design) and P12 (Landscape) of the Core Strategy will be used to ensure that the design and landscaping of new development reflects the character of the surrounding area



1311A (blank) Anti development EnvironmentLoss of greenspace/green corridor

2


n/a

Overdevelopment 1





Trees 1 Noted.



Visual impact 2







Highways Access 6






1311A (blank) Anti development Highways Parking 1



Public transport 1



The site requirements for this site identify that provision should be made to improve access to public transport and local services.

Safety 2









1311A (blank) Anti development Housing Issues Cumulative impact 1




House prices 1


n/a






n/a

Urban sprawl 7






n/a



1311A (blank) Anti development Other General infrastructure 4










Schools full 1


The site requirements for this site identify that the provision of a school is required within this site. This is also shown on the Plan.

HG2-5 (part)Pro development Environment Environ/social/econ benefits1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.No harm to green belt/countryside1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Sustainability 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Viable/available/suitable/doable1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Other General support 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

None 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Sustainable 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Schools/Health/CommunityClose to facilities/shops1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.






Sustainability 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Wildlife/biodiversity impact 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





1311B (blank) Anti development Housing Issues Urban sprawl 3 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





Pro development Environment Environ/social/econ benefits 1 Noted











Other Close to employment 1 Noted


General infrastructure 1 Noted







2163A (blank) Anti development Environment Conservation/Heritage 4 Noted.


Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to Listed Buildings and the Guiseley Conservation Area.



2163A (blank) Anti development Environment Flooding/drainage 1Noted. The Site Assessment considers the Flood Zone (as defined by the Environment Agency) that each site is within.


Site specific requirements are identified for this site in relation to flood risk.

Green Belt 5



Greenfield 1








2


n/a

Overdevelopment 1




Trees 1 Noted.





2163A (blank) Anti development Environment Visual impact 2







Highways Access 7



The site requirements for this site identify that provision should be made to improve highway access to the site.

Parking 2



Public transport 1


As outlined as part of the generic considerations set out under paragraph 2.54 of the SAP, further consideration of highways issues will be made at Planning Application Stage. Core Strategy Policy T2 requires sites with significant trip generating uses will need to complete Transport Assessments. Developer contributions may be required towards off site highway works, as well as cycling, walking and public transport provision. The site requirements for this site identify that provision should be made to improve access to public transport and local services.



2163A (blank) Anti development Highways Safety 2







Housing Issues Cumulative impact 1




House prices 1


n/a






2163A (blank) Anti development Housing Issues Overall housing figure 1


n/a

Urban sprawl 7








Sustainability appraisal 1 Noted A Sustainability Appraisal has been prepared which considers all of the proposed allocations / rejected

sites.










2163A (blank) Anti development Schools/Health/Community






Schools full 2


The site requirements for this site identify that the provision of a school is required within this site. This is also shown on the Plan.



HG2-5 (part)Pro development Environment Contribute to improving POS1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Environ/social/econ benefits1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.No harm to green belt/countryside1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Viable/available/suitable/doable1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Other Close to employment 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

General infrastructure 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.Sustainable 1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.

Schools/Health/CommunityClose to facilities/shops1 Noted Site is allocated for development in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.






Highways Access 5 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Public transport 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan. Safety 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Housing Issues Urban sprawl 5 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.


Schools/Health/Community GP/Dentist full 1 Noted. Site is not proposed for allocation in the Site Allocations Publication Draft Plan.





2163B (blank) Pro development Environment Environ/social/econ benefits 1 Noted

















Issues and Options Consultation Responses - Aireborough HMCA SHLAA RefSAP … IandO... · 2017. 9....

Documents

Transcript of Issues and Options Consultation Responses - Aireborough HMCA SHLAA RefSAP … IandO... · 2017. 9....