IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

15
ORANGE COUNTY The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity and Disease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Health and Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide program is supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable Trust. NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical education groups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative North Carolina. IsPOD Data Results Spring 2010

description

IsPOD Data Results Spring 2010 2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation All rights reserved. % Needy ID School Name Grades 3-5 Grades 1-2 SPARK Trained? 2009- 2010 ADM Using FG? FG Response Rates 2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved. # Staff Trained

Transcript of IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

Page 1: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation All rights reserved.

ORANGE COUNTY

The North Carolina Alliance for Athletics, Health, Physical Education, Recreation,

and Dance (NCAAHPERD), launched In-school Prevention of Obesity and Disease (IsPOD) in 2007. The initiative began with a grant from the NC Health and Wellness Trust Fund and was expanded with grants from the Blue Cross

Blue Shield of North Carolina Foundation. The expansion to a state-wide program

is supported by a $3.6 million grant from the Kate B. Reynolds Charitable Trust. NCAAHPERD is engaged with a large network of health and physical education

groups seeking greater opportunities for a healthier and more creative North Carolina.

IsPOD Data Results

Spring 2010

Page 2: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation

Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH All rights reserved.

Orange County

SPARK Training

Staff from Orange County began receiving SPARK training in the 2008-2009

school year with the KBR Grant. Orange County has 11 K-8 public schools. Of

these 11 schools, 10 schools (or 91%) have received SPARK training. At these

schools, a total of 13 PE teachers and 0 coordinators have been trained in

SPARK. Table 1 shows the Orange County K-8 schools that have received

SPARK training and the number of staff trained. FitnessGram Response Rates

are also given for each of the K-8 schools.

Table 1

Orange County K-8 Schools

Schools with SPARK Training and FitnessGram Response Rates

ID School Name

DEMOGRAPHICS SPARK FITNESSGRAM

2009-2010 ADM

% Needy

SPARK Trained?

# Staff Trained

Using FG?

FG Response Rates

Grades 1-2

Grades 3-5

Grades 6-8

304 A L Stanback Middle 592 35% YES 2 YES NA NA 21%

308 Cameron Park Elementary 631 33% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

312 Central Elementary 238 80% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

316 Charles W Stanford Middle 569 33% YES 1 NO NA NA 0%

324 Efland Cheeks Elementary 400 60% YES 1 YES 87% 96% NA

327 Gravelly Hill Middle 494 38% YES 2 NO NA NA 0%

328 Grady Brown Elementary 453 31% YES 1 YES 0% 96% NA

329 Hillsborough Elementary 410 17% YES 1 NO 0% 0% NA

330 New Hope Elementary 590 53% YES 1 YES 52% 96% NA

335 Partnership Academy 17 89% NO 0 NO NA NA 0%

336 Pathways Elementary 483 43% YES 2 NO 0% 0% NA

Page 3: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

2

Orange County

FitnessGram Response Rates

In spring 2010, 4 of the Orange County K-8 schools, or 36%, conducted

FitnessGram assessments and submitted their data. Table 2 shows the

FitnessGram Response Rates by grade for all Orange County K-8 schools

combined.

Table 2

FitnessGram Response Rates

For 4 K-8 Schools in Orange County

Grade 2009-2010

Average Daily Membership

FitnessGram Response Rate

Number of FG Student Ids

Percent of ADM

1st 549 65 12%

2nd 577 161 28%

3rd 520 239 46%

4th 532 227 43%

5th 568 256 45%

6th 551 42 8%

7th 558 46 8%

8th 548 38 7%

Page 4: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

3

Body Mass Index (BMI)

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Health Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 56% 57% 937 528 884 500

2nd 55% 57% 1175 642 1209 689

3rd 57% 55% 9670 5556 10075 5558

4th 54% 52% 9624 5227 10103 5260

5th 53% 51% 9396 4961 9857 5043

6th 54% 50% 3528 1893 3550 1785

7th 57% 52% 3315 1897 3149 1644

8th 56% 54% 3174 1780 3321 1802

56%

55% 57%

54%

53%

54% 57%

56%

57%

57%

55%

52%

51%

50%

52%

54%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 5: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

4

Body Mass Index (BMI)

Orange County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 4 K-8 Schools in Orange County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 52% 53% 33 17 32 17

2nd 50% 53% 84 42 32 41

3rd 61% 49% 125 76 113 55

4th 58% 52% 95 55 126 66

5th 59% 46% 117 69 137 63

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

52%

50%

61%

58%

59%

53%

53%

49% 52%

46%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 6: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

5

PACER

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

4th 95% 61% 6952 6625 7321 4485

5th 82% 58% 6569 5398 6994 4047

6th 77% 54% 1882 1452 1936 1039

7th 68% 50% 1787 1222 1825 906

8th 58% 52% 1774 1036 1908 997

95%

82%

77%

68%

58%61%

58%

54%

50% 52%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 7: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

6

PACER

Orange County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 4 K-8 Schools in Orange County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

4th 94% 53% 62 58 76 40

5th 83% 48% 69 57 84 40

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

94%

83%

53%

48%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 8: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

7

CURL-UP

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 83% 84% 917 759 879 742

2nd 78% 79% 1260 989 1300 1032

3rd 82% 82% 11285 9254 11683 9544

4th 80% 81% 11221 8954 11729 9512

5th 78% 80% 10865 8483 11370 9152

6th 86% 87% 3857 3316 3895 3373

7th 86% 87% 3477 2978 3427 2990

8th 84% 88% 3402 2869 3448 3029

83%

78% 82%

80%

78%

86%

86%

84%

84%

79% 82%

81%

80% 87%

87%

88%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 9: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

8

CURL-UP

Orange County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 4 K-8 Schools in Orange County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st NA NA 0 0 0 0

2nd 91% 90% 56 51 51 46

3rd 79% 81% 124 98 110 89

4th 78% 83% 97 76 126 104

5th 76% 81% 117 89 132 107

6th 95% 100% 19 18 22 22

7th 100% 96% 19 19 25 24

8th 92% 100% 25 23 12 12

91%

79%

78%

76%

95% 100%

92%

90%

81%

83%

81%

100%

96% 100%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 10: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

9

PUSH-UP

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 50% 63% 627 314 592 372

2nd 48% 62% 935 451 924 573

3rd 56% 70% 9157 5163 9527 6638

4th 52% 68% 9129 4713 9510 6475

5th 52% 66% 8900 4642 9309 6117

6th 68% 72% 3092 2093 3165 2272

7th 69% 72% 2768 1912 2742 1984

8th 68% 70% 2696 1830 2811 1965

50%

48%

56%

52%

52%

68%

69%

68%

63%

62%

70%

68%

66% 72%

72%

70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 11: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

10

PUSH-UP

Orange County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 4 K-8 Schools in Orange County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st NA NA 0 0 0 0

2nd 63% 63% 56 35 51 32

3rd 57% 67% 122 70 111 74

4th 56% 60% 93 52 124 75

5th 67% 65% 118 79 133 87

6th 63% 86% 19 12 22 19

7th 82% 88% 17 14 25 22

8th 76% 82% 25 19 11 9

63%

57%

56%

67%

63%

82%

76%

63% 67%

60% 65%

86%

88%

82%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 12: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

11

SIT AND REACH

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 66% 64% 702 460 664 423

2nd 68% 66% 922 629 935 618

3rd 70% 69% 6371 4486 6681 4581

4th 69% 65% 6229 4292 6596 4319

5th 62% 62% 6219 3839 6558 4060

6th 58% 58% 2371 1376 2445 1413

7th 66% 65% 2197 1447 2134 1382

8th 66% 67% 2131 1411 2247 1510

66% 68%

70%

69%

62%

58%

66%

66%

64% 66% 69%

65%

62%

58%

65% 67%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 13: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

12

SIT AND REACH

Orange County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 4 K-8 Schools in Orange County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st NA NA 0 0 0 0

2nd 64% 61% 56 36 51 31

3rd 70% 63% 125 88 111 70

4th 77% 65% 97 75 129 84

5th 38% 63% 118 45 133 84

6th 0% 0% 19 0 22 0

7th 10% 4% 20 2 23 1

8th 5% 0% 21 1 12 0

64%

70%

77%

38%

0%

10%

5%

61% 63% 65%

63%

0%

4%

0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 14: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducted by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

13

TRUNK LIFT

North Carolina

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 370 NC K-8 Schools in 61 NC Counties

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st 91% 88% 744 680 746 659

2nd 91% 92% 1063 963 1056 971

3rd 93% 91% 10281 9572 10608 9648

4th 84% 80% 10205 8587 10688 8573

5th 81% 77% 9821 7973 10336 8001

6th 83% 79% 3438 2859 3361 2646

7th 82% 77% 3231 2656 3086 2364

8th 84% 79% 3136 2631 3161 2492

91%

91% 93%

84%

81%

83%

82%

84%88% 92%

91%

80%

77%

79%

77%

79%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male

Page 15: IsPOD DISTRICT REPORT - ORANGE 10OCT04

2010 NC IsPOD Evaluation Conducte4d by NCAAHPERD/NC DPH

All rights reserved.

14

TRUNK LIFT

Orange County

Spring 2010 Percent in Healthy Fitness Zone (HFZ)

FitnessGram Results for 4 K-8 School in Orange County

Grade

Percent in HFZ Counts in HFZ

Female Male

Female Male

Total FG Results

N in HFZ Total FG Results

N in HFZ

1st NA NA 0 0 0 0

2nd 73% 65% 56 41 51 33

3rd 88% 83% 123 108 112 93

4th 81% 74% 95 77 128 95

5th 75% 75% 119 89 137 103

6th NA NA 0 0 0 0

7th NA NA 0 0 0 0

8th NA NA 0 0 0 0

73%

88%

81%

75%

65%

83%

74%

75%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

110%

2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Pe

rce

nt

in H

FZ

Grade

Female Male