ICIG rocsl b ISIJ (SOOT) esncq conuc!l.e TAGpe!CG: EOL suq ...
Isij Sept 2013 v2
Transcript of Isij Sept 2013 v2
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
1/10
Effect of temperature on carbon deposition
during integrated coal pyrolysis−tardecomposition over low grade iron ore
ISIJ Conference
March 2014
1
Rochim B. Cahyono, Naoto Yasuda, Takahiro Nomura,Tomohiro Akiyama
Hokkaido University
Fuel 89 (2010) 1784 –
1795
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
2/10
2
Years
P i g i r o n p r o d u c t i o n ,
1 0 3 M t
Adapted from World Steel Association, 2011.
Ironmaking industry
World Steel Association, 2011. Steel statistical yearbook 2011, world steel Committee on Economic Studies-BRUSSELS,
2011. World Steel Association, p. 101; The Japan Iron and Steel federation
Highly required
alternative ofreduced agent and
iron ore sources
Raw materials : Coal (HG) = 690 kg/ton-pig ironIron ore (HG) = 1390 kg/ton-pig iron
Consumes around 5% of the total world energy
Energy recovery : 25.3 % input energy
CO2 emission: 1519 kg-CO2/ton-pig iron
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
3/10
3
Tar decomposition VS carbon deposition
Tar decomposition/cracking:
Carbon deposition:
Catalytic process
Endothermic reaction
High conversion at elevated
temperature
The purposes:
(1) To obtain the optimum temperatures forboth the pyrolysis and tar decomposition
processes for high carbon deposition
(2) To understand the main factors in the
carbon deposition process with different
contents of combined water (CW)
Required high surface area/pore
volume
High deposition at lower
temperature
Carbon gasification at hightemperature
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
4/10
4
Dehydration process
(a)
Micropore
Macropore
Mesopore
Removing H2O during dehydration process
created porous ore with layer by layer structure
The micropore/mesopore was predominat in the
dehydrated ore
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
5/10
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
400 500 600 700 800 900
C a r b o n y i e l d [ % m a s s - C ]
Pyrolysis temp [oC]
C a r b o n y i e l d [ % m a s s - C ]
Char
Gas
Tar
Deposited -C
H ore; tar decomposition temp : 600 oC
Coal pyrolysis
At elevated temperature,
char amount decreased
while volatile matter (gas
and tar) increased due to
thermal cracking
Products distribution
Beside large deposited carbon, clean gas with small tar
was resulted at high pyrolysis temperature
5
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
6/10
Thermal cracking athigh pyrolysis
temperature enhanced
the volume of H2 and
CO
Beside large carbondeposition, high
pyrolysis temperature
resulted also extra
heating value
]CH[%volx396.1
]H[%volx110.2CO][%volx127.1)(MJ/NmLHV
4
2
3
Lower Heating Value
4
6
8
10
12
0
40
80
120
160
400 500 600 700 800 900
G a s v o l u m
e [ N c m 3 / g - c o a l ]
Pyrolysis temp [oC]
L H V
[ M J / N m 3 ]
H2
CH4
CO2
CO
LHV
H ore; tar decomposition temp : 600 oC
Coal pyrolysis
6
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
7/10
0
20
40
60
80
100
400 500 600 700 800
C a r b o n y i e l d [ % m a s s - C ]
Tar decomposition temp [oC]
Gas Deposited carbon tar Unreacted tar
H ore, Pyrolysis temp : 800 oC
Tar decomposition
Tar product distribution
CnhydrocarbolightotherCHCOCOHTar 422
kJ172.48HCO2CCO2
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
1
2
3
4
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
C
a r b o n c o n t e n t [ % m a s s ]
Tar decomposition temp [oC]
Deposited carbon
Total volume
G a s v o l u m e [ L ]
Pyrolysis temp = 800 oC
Lignite coal
7
At constant pyrolysis temperature, the maximum carbon content was
obtained at tar decomposition of 600 oC.
At high temperature, deposited carbon decreased due to high tar activity
and carbon gasification to produce larger gas product
Highest
deposition
Unreacted tar
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
8/10
A higher temperature resulted in a
large reduction degree because ofindirect reduction of CO and fast
reduction rate.
FeO was found at high
temperature; this is consistent with
the phase diagram.
30 40 50 60 70 80
2θ [degree]
I n t e n s i t y [ a . u
]
400 oC
500 oC
600 oC
700 oC
800 oC
Dehydrated ore
Fe2O3 Fe3O4 FeOH ore; pyrolysis temp : 800oC
(b)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Tar decomposition temp [oC]
Fe
Fe3O4
FeO P C O
P C O
+ P C O 2
[ - ]
Fe2O3
H ore; pyrolysis temp : 800 oC
(a)
2
243
24332
COFeCOFeO
CO3FeOCOOFe
;COO2FeCOO3Fe
Tar decomposition
8
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
9/10
0
20
40
60
0 5 10 15
P o
r e s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n
[ 1 0 - 6 m 3 / n m / k g ]
Pore size [nm]
DH
400600
800
: Dehydrated ore (DH)
: Tar decomposition at 400o
C: Tar decomposition at 600 oC
: Tar decomposition at 800 oC
H ore;
Pyrolysis temp: 800 oC
86.7
21.9 20.3
2.8
DH 400 600 800
BET surface
area [m2/g]
Tar decomposition temp [oC]
3.15
3.89
1.94
400 600 800
Carbon deposition [%mass]
Tar decomposition temp [oC]
Tar decomposition
9
Smallest carbon deposition
but largest deceasing of
surface are and pore
distribution, why??
The amount of carbon deposition should be
proportional with the decreasing of surface
area and pore size distribution.
The melting point of the iron ore (Fe2O3) was
1733 K(=1460oC)
Sintering process
[14] HSC chemistry 7.0; [15] Canovaa, IC. et.al. Materials Research Vol. 2, No. 3, (1999) 211-217
-
8/16/2019 Isij Sept 2013 v2
10/10
Conclusions
At constant temperature of tar decomposition, high pyrolysis temperature
resulted large deposited carbon and clean gas with extra heating valueThe highest deposited carbon was obtained at pyrolysis temperature of
800 oC and tar decomposition temperature of 600 oC.
At elevated temperature, the amount of deposited carbon decreased due
to carbon gasification.
At tar decomposition temperature of 800 oC, the FeO was found but the
sintering phenomena was started
10