IS IT ODA? Brian Hammond OECD Development Assistance Committee Statistical Capacity: A tool for...
-
Upload
amber-anderson -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of IS IT ODA? Brian Hammond OECD Development Assistance Committee Statistical Capacity: A tool for...
IS IT ODA? Brian Hammond
OECD Development Assistance Committee
Statistical Capacity: A tool for policy analysis and management
Brian Hammond, DAC Secretariat
Istanbul, 12-13 October 2006
Comparing Spend to Budget
DFID: Resource Accounts 2005-06
Deciding on Sectors and Regions/Countries
Korea: MDG Report
Monitoring Results - 1
Netherlands: Results inDevelopment 2004
Monitoring Results - 2
Netherlands: Results inDevelopment 2004
Monitoring Results - 3
Netherlands: Results inDevelopment 2004
Net ODA 2004
.. 100 200 300 400 500
Iceland
Slovak Republic
Hungary
Czech Republic
Poland
Turkey
Korea
US$ million
Net ODA 2004
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
Poland
Hungary
Korea
Slovak Republic
Czech Republic
Turkey
Iceland
% of GNI
International Comparisons
Reports to DAC
Monitoring Future ODA Commitments
DAC Secretariat Simulation
DAC Members' net ODA 1990 - 2005 and DAC Secretariat simulations of net ODA to 2006 and 2010
0.22
0.26
0.36
0.33
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
% o
f G
NI
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
OD
A (
2004
US
D b
illi
on
)
ODA as a % of GNI (left scale)
Total ODA(right scale)
Total ODA to Africa(right scale)
0.33
Many agencies provide ODA
USAID
Treasury12.5%
USAID52.6%
USDA1.5%
DoD7.9%
Peace Corps1.5%
HHS4.5%
Labor0.6%
Other1.6%
State17.2%
Distribution of US ODA by Agency 2004Bilateral and Multilateral $19,705mn
Purpose codes to analyse sectors
DAC Secretariat
Line Number Description
110 Education
120 Health
130 Population Policies/Programmes and Reproductive Health
140 Water Supply and Sanitation
150 Government and Civil Society
160 Other Social Infrastructure and Services
200 Economic Infrastructure and Services
300 Production Sectors
400 Multisector/Cross-Cutting
500 Commodity Aid and General Programme Assistance
600 Action Relating to Debt
700 Humanitarian Aid
910 Administrative Costs of Donors
930 Refugees in Donor Countries
998 Unallocated/ Unspecified
Markers for cross-cutting themes
DAC Secretariat
GENDER EQUALITY
DEFINITION An activity should be classified
as gender equality focused (score Principal or Significant) if:
It is intended to advance gender equality and women’s empowerment or reduce discrimination and inequalities based on sex.
CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY Gender equality is explicitly promoted in activity documentation through specific measures which:
• a) Reduce social, economic or political power inequalities between women and men, girls and boys, ensure that women benefit equally with men from the activity, or compensate for past discrimination; or
• b) Develop or strengthen gender equality or anti-discrimination policies, legislation or institutions.
• This approach requires analysing gender inequalities either separately or as an integral part of agencies’ standard procedures.
• See also FAQ on gender analysis in the Appendix.•
EXAMPLES OF TYPICAL ACTIVITIES
Examples of activities that could be marked as principal objective:• -- legal literacy for women and girls;• -- male networks against gender violence; etc….
Annual Report: Regions and Partners
Turkey: TIKA Annual Report
8.2 Development efforts by Korea as an emerging donorKorea’s first official development assistance (ODA)occurred in the mid-1960s when trainees fromdeveloping countries were invited and providedwith technical training……….
MDG Report: Contribution of ODA
Korea: MDG Report 2005
Linking ODA to the MDGs - 1
MDG8 Progress Report by the Netherlands
Linking ODA to the MDGs - 2
MDG8 Progress Report by the Netherlands
DAC Development Co-operation Report
DAC Secretariat
Table 33. ODA from Non-DAC Donors
Net disbursements USD million
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Memo : 2004 ODA/GNI (%)
OECD Non-DAC Czech Republic 16 26 45 91 108 0.11 Hungary .. .. .. 21 55 0.06 Iceland 9 10 13 18 21 0.18 Korea 212 265 279 366 423 0.06 Poland 29 36 14 27 118 0.05 Slovak Republic 6 8 7 15 28 0.07 Turkey 82 64 73 67 339 0.11
Arab countries Kuwait 165 73 20 138 209 .. Saudi Arabia 295 490 2 478 2 391 1 734 0.69 United Arab Emirates 150 127 156 188 181 ..
Other donors Chinese Taipei .. .. .. .. 421 0.13 Israel a 164 76 114 92 66 0.06 Other donors b 1 2 3 4 22 0.05
TOTAL 1 128 1 178 3 201 3 416 3 726 ..
Donor Aid at a Glance: an overview
DAC Secretariat
Turkey Gross Bilateral ODA, 2004-05 average, unless otherwise shown
Net ODA 2004 2005Change 2004/05
Clockwise from top
Current (USD m) 339 601 77.2% Constant (2004 USD m) 339 654 92.8% In Liras (million) 388 805 107.4% ODA/GNI 0.11% 0.17% Bilateral share 86% 89%
1 Pakistan 632 Kyrgyz Rep. 463 Kazakhstan 374 Azerbaijan 265 Iraq 196 Afghanistan 197 Turkmenistan 178 Indonesia 159 States Ex-Yugoslavia Unsp. 14
10 Bosnia and Herzegovina 12
Top Ten Recipients of Gross ODA (USD million)
By Sector
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Education, Health & Population Other Social Infrastructure Economic Infrastucture
Production Multisector Programme Assistance
Debt Relief Emergency Aid Unspecified
By Income Group (US $m)LDCs
Other Low-Income
Lower Middle-Income
Upper Middle-Income
Unallocated
By Region (US $m)TOTAL BYREGIONSSub-SaharanAfricaSouth andCentral AsiaOther Asia andOceaniaMiddle East andNorth Africa
By Income Group (US $m)LDCs
Other Low-Income
Lower Middle-Income
Upper Middle-Income
Unallocated
By Region (US $m)TOTAL BYREGIONSSub-SaharanAfricaSouth andCentral AsiaOther Asia andOceaniaMiddle East andNorth Africa
By Income Group (USD m)
44
198
22
132
17LDCs
Other Low-Income
Lower Middle-Income
Upper Middle-Income
Unallocated
By Region (USD m)
31
232
29
3
0
63
53
Sub-SaharanAfricaSouth and CentralAsiaOther Asia andOceaniaMiddle East andNorth AfricaLatin America andCaribbeanEurope
Unspecified
Recipient Aid at a Glance: all donors
DAC Secretariat
Kazakhstan
Receipts 2002 2003 2004 (USD m)
Net ODA (USD million) 188 269 265 1 Japan 137
Bilateral share (gross ODA) 90% 95% 93% 2 United States 52
Net ODA / GNI 0.8% 0.9% 0.7% 3 Turkey 15
4 Germany 14 Net Private flows (USD million) 1 383 370 850 5 Arab Countries 11
6 Spain 11
For reference 2002 2003 2004 7 EC 9
Population (million) 14.9 14.9 15.0 8 Israel 3
GNI per capita (Atlas USD) 1 520 1 810 2 260 9 Netherlands 3
10 EBRD 3
Sources: OECD, World Bank.
Top Ten Donors of gross ODA (2003-04 average)
Bilateral ODA by Sector (2003-04)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Education Health & Population Other social sectorsEconomic Infrastructure & Services Production MultisectorProgramme Assistance Action relating to Debt Emergency AssistanceOther & Unallocated/Unspecified
Detailed analysis by sector
DAC Secretariat
Analysis using the markers
DAC Secretariat
Online access to data
DAC Secretariat
Paper and CD-ROM outputs
DAC Secretariat