2012 AIF, D1S2 PPT Irrigation Reform and Institutional Development by Bryan Bruns
IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
Transcript of IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
1/68
Irrigation in Endodontic
10/9/200610/9/2006
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
2/68
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
3/68
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
4/68
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
5/68
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
6/68
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
7/68
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
8/68
IntroductionIntroduction
Micro-organisms either remaining in rootcanal space after treatment orrecolonizing the root filled canal sytem arethe main cause of endodontic failure
rimary endodontic goal-to optimize rootcanal disinfection and pre!entrecolonization
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
9/68
The use of irrigating solutions is an important part of effective chemomechanical preparation.
Antibacterial agent.
Tissue solvent.
Flush debris.
Lubricant.
Eliminate the smear layer.
Various Irrigation Solution in Endodontic
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
10/68
Ideal root canal irrigantsIdeal root canal irrigants
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
11/68
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
12/68
NaOCl
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
13/68
NaOCl NaOCl Antibacterial agent
Dissolves vital and non-vital(necrotic) tissue.
Lubricant during instrumentation
as uni!ue capacity to dissolve organic components ofsmear layer
"a#$l has been critici%ed for&npleasant taste'elative to icity
nability to remove smear layer
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
14/68
Bactericidal of NaOCl NaOCl
#$l e erts its effects by o idi%ing sulphydrylgroups *ithin bacterial en%yme systems+thereby disrupting the metabolism of themicroorganism + resulting in the ,illing of the
bacterial cells .
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
15/68
Concentration
$ompared the biological effects of mild and strong "a#$l solutions and demonstrated greater cytoto icityand caustic effects on healthy tissue *ith . / "a#$lthan *ith 0. / and 1/ solutions.
Either . / or . / sodium hypochlorite has thesame effect *hen used in the root canal space for a
period of minutes.Trepagnier et al. (1977)
Pashley et al. (1985)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
16/68
"arming 2#$% naocl to &' degrees-"arming 2#$% naocl to &' degrees-
leads to same effect as $#2$%leads to same effect as $#2$%
(lass )armer *yringe )armer
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
17/68
Commented that The effectiveness of lowconcentrations of NaOCl may be improved by usinglarger volumes of irrigant or by the presence of
replenished irrigant in the canals for longer periodsof time.
Concentration of NaOCl
Baumgartner & Cuenin (1992)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
18/68
Is NaOCl NaOCl equally effective in dissolving vital,non-vital, or fixed tissue ???
Demonstrated that . / sodium hypochloritedissolves vital tissue. ( Rosenfeld et al. 1978 )
As a necrotic tissue solvent+ . / sodiumhypochlorite *as found to be significantly better than
.2/+ 1/+ or 0. /. (Hand et al.1978)
3/ sodium hypochlorite *as found to be optimal fordissolving tissue fi ed *ith parachlorophenol orformaldehyde (Th SD.1979)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
19/68
NaOCl & Ca(OH)2
4retreatment of tissue *ith calcium hydro ide canenhance the tissue-dissolving effect of sodiumhypochlorite.
Hasselgren et al.(1988)
$ombination of calcium hydro ide and sodium
hypochlorite *as more effective on the dissolution ofsoft tissue on the root canal *all than using eithermedicament alone.
Wadachi et al.(1998)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
20/68
NaOCl & EDTA
$ombining .0/ sodium hypochlorite *ith EDTAenhance considerably the bactericidal effect.
Bystr!m & "un#$%ist (1985
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
21/68
NaOCl & CHX
The alternate use of sodium hypochlorite andchlorhe idine gluconate irrigants resulted in a greater
reduction of microbial flora (56.2/) *hen compared*ith the individual use of sodium hypochlorite( 7.6/) or chlorhe idine gluconate (80/) alone.
uru%illa an# amath (1998)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
22/68
NaOCl & CHX
The time re!uired to eliminate E. faecalis depended onthe concentration and type of irrigant used.
$hlorhe idine in the li!uid form at all concentrations
tested (0. /+ 1/ and /) and "a#$l ( . /) *ere themost effective irrigants. o*ever+ the time re!uired by0. / chlorhe idine li!uid and / chlorhe idine gel to
promote negative cultures *as only 30 s and 1 min+respectively.
Gomes et al.( !!1)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
23/68
Temperature
igher temperatures potentiate the antimicrobial andtissue-dissolving effects of "a#$l.
ncreasing the temperature of hypochlorite irrigant to38 0 $+ significantly increased its tissue dissolvingability
Cunningham &Bale' ian (198 )
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
24/68
Chlorhexidine (CHX)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
25/68
Chlorhexidine C!"#
t possesses a broad-spectrum antimicrobial action anda relative absence of to icity.
$ 9 lac,s the tissue-dissolving ability.
t penetrates the cell *all and attac,s the bacterialcytoplasmic or inner membrane or the yeast plasmamembrane.
$oncentrations bet*een 0. / and /.ts activity is p dependent and is greatly reduced in
the presence of organic matter.
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
26/68
In Vitro-the anti$acterial effect of C!"
In vitro , $ 9 is superior to "a#$l in ,illing of E. faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus .
Gomes et al. ( !!1)"ncag et al. ( !!#)
$ianna et al. ( !!%)
$ 9 effectively ,illed C. albicans
&ar' oll * +ttramadal + (1989) Hiom e al. (199 )
Hamers et al. (199,) Waltimo et al. (1999)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
27/68
A potential *ea,ness of $ 9 in the root canal may beits susceptibility to the presence of organic matter.
(R-ssell +D * Da /0 199#)
n an in vitro study+ the effect of $ 9 is sho*ed to bereduced+ although not prevented+ by the presence ofdentine. Haapasalo et al. ( !!!)
$ 9 *as strongly inhibited by dentine matri (theorganic component of dentine).
ortenier et al. ( !! )
C*+
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
28/68
H 2 O
2
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
29/68
! % O % t is a clear+ colorless li!uid.
&sed in a variety of concentrations+ 1/ - 30/.
H 2 O 2 is active against viruses+ bacteria+ and yeasts.
t produces hydro yl free radicals (:# )+ *hich attac,several cell components such as proteins and D"A.
n endodontics+ H 2 O 2 has long been used because of its
antimicrobial and cleansing properties.t has been particularly popular in cleaning the pulp
chamber from blood and tissue remnants+ but it hasalso been used in canal irrigation.
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
30/68
In Vivo-the anti$acterial effect of ! % O %
;acteria counts *ere greatly reduced *hen 10/ H 2 O 2 *as used as part of the irrigating protocol.+ but the
protocol used could not predictably produce sterile root
canals in mon,ey teeth. ,!ller et al. (2 -)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
31/68
! % O %
Although H 2 O 2 has long been used in disinfection andcanal irrigation in endodontics+ the available literature
does not support its use over that of other irrigatingsolutions.
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
32/68
&'()
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
33/68
MTAD
A mi ture of t etracycline isomer+ acid+ and d etergent. (do ycycline+ citric acid+ and the detergent T*een-50)
t has antibacterial activity.t has lo* p .1
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
34/68
MTAD
The tissue-solubili%ing action of
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
35/68
MTAD & NaOCl The effect of various concentrations of "a#$l as an
irrigant before irrigation *ith
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
36/68
'he anti$acterial effect of MTAD
n vitro study+ the antibacterial effects of
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
37/68
BDA
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
38/68
BDA Bis-dequalinium acetate (;DA)
Lo* to icity Lubrication action Disinfecting ability
Lo* surface tension $helating properties. Lo* incidence of post-treatment pain.
;is-de!ualinium acetate is recommended as an e cellentsubstitute for sodium hypochlorite in those patients *hoare allergic to the latter.
aufman 1981
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
39/68
S*ear +ayer e*oval +emo!al of the smear layer is an important
step to facilitate disinfection of the root canal "rganic +cid 2rrigants3
$itric acid (1/ - 0/ ). 4olyacrylic acid (e.g. Durelon and Fu>u li!uids).
Solutions
$arbamide pero ide.
Amino!uinaldinium diacetate (i.e.+ ?alvi%ol).
Chelating Agents
EDTA
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
40/68
S*ear +ayer e*oval
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
41/68
'emoval of the smear layer by EDTA (or citric acid)improves the antibacterial effect of locally useddisinfecting agents in deeper layers of dentine.
rsta%i' & *aa asalo (199 )
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
42/68
Chelating (gents Chelating (gents
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
43/68
Chelating (gents
EDTA ( ethylene- diamine tetra- aceticacid) EDTA$ ( ethylene- diamine tetra- aceticacid @centrimide) File-E%e
'$ 4rep
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
44/68
EDTA
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
45/68
EDTA
EDTA (18/+ disodium salt+ p 8)
EDTA has little if any antibacterial activity.
t effectively removes smear layer by chelating theinorganic component of the dentine.
Aid in mechanical canal shaping.
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
46/68
EDTA
The ultrastructure on canal *alls after EDTA andcombined EDTA @ "a#$l irrigation *as evaluated byscanning electron microscopy.
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
47/68
The optimal *or,ing time of EDTA is 1 minutes+after *hich time no more chelating action can bee pected.
EDTA solutions should replaces in the canal each 1minutes.
3ol#/erg an# " iel/erg (1982)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
48/68
RC-Prep
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
49/68
RC-Prep
'$-4rep is composed of EDTA and urea pero ide in a base of $arbo*a .
t is not *ater soluble.
"a#$l @ '$-4rep
nteraction of the urea pero ide in '$-4rep *ith sodium
hypochlorite+ producing a bubbling action thought toloosen and help float out dentinal debris.
Summary of various irrigation techniques
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
50/68
Summary of various irrigation techniques
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
51/68
,ndo!ac irrigation,ndo!ac irrigation
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
52/68
etailed picture of endo!ac needleetailed picture of endo!ac needle
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
53/68
ltrasonic Irrigation ltrasonic Irrigation
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
54/68
Irrigation )ithout dripIrrigation )ithout drip
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
55/68
ltrasonic Irrigation ltrasonic Irrigation The enhancement of the flushing action of an irrigantsolution by using ultrasound is *ell documented.
(4-nningham * /artin 198 5 4-nningham et al. 198 5Stoc' 19915 6-mle et al. 199#5 6ee et al.
!!%)The ultrasound device allo* the endodontic irrigant to
pass along the ultrasonic files. The irrigant is activated by the ultrasonic energy imparted from the energi%edinstruments producing acoustic streaming and eddies.
(+hmad et al. 19875 rell * 0ohnson 19885 Stoc'1991)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
56/68
Ultrasonic IrrigationUltrasonic Irrigation
Mechanical . chemical# * can reach difficult anatomy irrigant
!i ration and cleaning of the canal space#
* creates oth ca!itation and acousticstreaming#
nti acterial effects 3shear stress4#
5here is a synergistic effect et)eensodium hypochlorite 3 a78l4 and *#3 a78l lo!es heat4
BUC
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
57/68
BUC
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
58/68
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
59/68
Acoustic streaming around a file in free water (left) and a schematicdrawing (right).
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
60/68
ltrasonic !i ration can also e effecti!e)hen touching the shan of a hand file
inserted inside the canal# 5he hand file )illtransmit !i rations to the irrigant inside thecanal ut a greater ris for touching
dentinal )alls e:ists# 5he use of a smooth )ire during ultrasonicirrigation in !itro )as as effecti!e as a ;-
file in de ris remo!al and )ith , 5 itenhances the cleanliness of the canal#
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
61/68
Re resentative S!" hotomicrogra hs.(#mm from the a e$) S ecimens with ( + )smear score % and de&ris score %' ( &) smear score and de&ris score ' and ( 4 )smear score # and de&ris score #
* !+,A- ultrasonic Ultrasonic followed &ya/Cl 0*
0* a/Cl for min.followed &y 0* a/Cl
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
62/68
Irrigation &y ! +/AC,I1A,/RIrrigation &y ! +/AC,I1A,/R
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
63/68
'y.es of endodntic needles
;eveled needleect endodontic needle. 4ro'inse probes.
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
64/68
ect endodontic needles to be the most efficientdelivery system in *hich longer needles of a blunted+open-end system *ere inserted to the full length ofthe canal.
The point is that a larger volume of solution can bedelivered by this method. o*ever+ the closer theneedle tip is placed to the ape + the greater the
potential for damage to the periradicular tissues.
,oser an# *euer (1982)
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
65/68
n order to be effective+ the needle delivering thesolution must come in close pro imity to the materialto be removed.
?mall diameter needles *ere found to be moreeffective in reaching ade!uate depth but *ere more
prone to problems of possible brea,age and difficultyin e pressing the irrigant from the narro* needles.
+ o- Rass / (198 )
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
66/68
Met o! o" #$e
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
67/68
ðod of se
t is strongly recommended that the needle lie passively in the canal and not engage the *alls.
The solution must be introduced slo*ly.
The irrigating needle should be bent to allo* easierdelivery of the solution and to prevent deep
penetration of the needle.
$are must be ta,en *ith irrigants li,e sodiumhypochlorite to prevent accidents.
-
8/9/2019 IRRIGATION 2 BDS 3.ppt
68/68