IRB Approval Date:IRB Protocol #:

1117/20131301008706

An Emerging Technology Assessment of Factory-Grown Food

Dear Participant:

On behalf of the Lincoln Center for Applied Ethics and the School of Sustainable Engineering and theBuilt Environment at Arizona State University, thank you for participating in this workshop. We'd like toremind you that your participation in the study is voluntary. You may choose not to participate orwithdraw at any time. Moreover, you can skip any questions and activities that you wish.

Results of this research may be used in reports, presentations, dissertations, or publications but there areno foreseeable risks associated with participation. Your anonymity will be protected to the extentpossible. Your responses will be coded with a participant number and an optional identifier, should youchoose to provide more information about yourself (e.g. "ASU Psychology Professor"). Notes will betaken during the workshop proceedings, but note-takers will be instructed not to record any names orother personally-identifiable information. However, due to the nature of workshops, complete anonymitycannot be guaranteed; therefore, a "Chatham House Rule" will be strongly encouraged during and afterthe meeting. Under this rule, participants will be free to repeat the information received during theworkshop, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant,may be revealed.

If you have any questions concerning the research study, please contact the research team at the addressor phone number given at the end of this letter.

If you have any questions about your rights as a subject/participant in this research, or if you feel youhave been placed at risk, you can contact the Chair of the Human Subjects Institutional Review Board,through the ASU Office of Research Integrity and Assurance, at (480) 965-6788.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Braden R. AllenbyPrincipal InvestigatorSchool of Sustainable Engineering and the Built EnvironmentArizona State UniversityMail Code 5306P.O. Box 875306, Tempe, AZ, 85287 USABraden.Allenby@asu.eduPhone: (480)727-6259 Fax: (480)965-0557

Amy E. LandisCo-InvestigatorSchool of Sustainable Engineering and the Built EnvironmentArizona State UniversityMail Code 5306P.O. Box 875306, Tempe, AZ, 85287 USAAmy.Landis@asu.edu

IRB Approval Date:IRB Protocol #:

1/17120131301008706

Jameson M. WetmoreCo-InvestigatorConsortium for Science, Policy, and OutcomesSchool of Human Evolution and Social ChangArizona State UniversityMail Code 2402P.O. Box 872402, Tempe, AZ, 85287 USAJameson. Wetmore@asu.edu

11:30 to 12:00 Lunch and research briefmg

12:00 to 12:45 Moderated discussion

12:45 to 1:00 Break

1:00 to 2:00 Moderated discussion

2:00 to 2:30 Participants complete questionnaire regarding socialimplications of cultured meat

2:30 to 3:00 Feedback on this workshop

The investigators would like to thank the Lincoln Center for Applied Ethics for their generous financialsupport .

• LINCOLN CENTERfor APPLIED ETHICS

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRB Approval Date: 1117/2013IRB Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: Wl-2

Part 1Please complete before or after the workshop interaction.

Assuming that cultured meat is not widely adopted anywhere in the world, what changes would youexpect to see in the United States by 2050? (For example, changes in food supply, religion, education,family structures, etc.)

~ r ~ ,,~/';-c. c- /\ -f-. CA-I"- j ove' fllr"eA'-f

S051-J;e5 O'-re. redc./ce.d s r e .\.r1~"cl+erJ.

~2 <./r"- P .J- 'l.rA-J. EJ...----c-c+ ~~ (}.Q ~ C'lfU<' lrJ J-,f c -../.> 5c ,5 # e d~ l-r,-....~-;-de /' o.f' (}...0. ~r'"'o- (

By default, your responses will be associated only with the participant number that appears in the upperright hand corner ofthis page. However, if you are willing to provide additional personal informationincluding your profession, employer, position/title, or name, please do so here. This information may berepeated in the reporting of the research and in associated publications and presentations.

(optional)

1

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRB Approval Date: 1117/2013IRB Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: W1-2

Part 2Social Narrative

Please complete part 2,3, or 4 (or any combination) after the workshop interaction.

What social changes might occur in the United States if cultured meat generally replaced traditional meatproducts by 2050?

2

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRB Approval Date: 1/17/2013IRB Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: Wl-2

Part 3Specific Social Impacts

Please complete part 2, 3, or 4 (or any combination) after the workshop interaction.

What do think are the most important changes that could arise in the United States if cultured meatgenerally replaced traditional meat products by 2050?

FoodIn terms of food and the food system in general, what changes might occur in the United States if culturedmeat generally replaced traditional meat products by 2050? Some factors to consider might be:

• Food prices• Cuisine diversity• Cuisine quality• Food consumption patterns (quantitative

or qualitative differences)• Vegetarian or vegan diets• Food security

• Food system sustainability• Food system resilience: the ability of a

system to maintain its functions andstructure in the face of internal andexternal change (e.g., drought or risingenergy prices) and to degrade gracefullywhen it must

3

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRE Approval Date: 1117/2013IRE Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: W 1-2

Human HealthWhat changes in human health and nutrition might occur in the United States if cultured meat generallyreplaced traditional meat products by 2050? Some factors to consider might be:

• Obesity • Infectious diseases• Malnourishment • Food-borne illnesses• Life expectancy • Cancer rates

• Health expenditure per capita • Mental health

Family and EducationWhat changes in family dynamics and education might occur in the United States if cultured meatgenerally replaced traditional meat products by 2050? Some factors to consider might be:

• Family size• Marriage rate

• School graduation rate• Standardized test scores

4

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRB Approval Date: 1117/2013IRB Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: Wl-2

Ethics and CultureWhat shifts in ethics and culture might occur in the United States if cultured meat generally replacedtraditional meat products by 2050? Some factors to consider might be social trust and social tolerance.

Do you think cultured meat could have an impact on the cultural identity of some groups? If so, whatgroups and how could they be impacted?

Demographics and General StatisticsWhat changes in population dynamics might occur in the United States if cultured meat generallyreplaced traditional meat products by 2050? Some factors to consider might be:

• Population and growth rate • Income per capita• Median age • Employment patterns• Fertility rate (births per woman) • Income equality (GINI index)• Immigration • Gender equity (wages and leadership roles)• Urban population • Leisure time• Poverty rate and the poor

5

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRB Approval Date: 1117/2013IRB Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: WI-2

Global ImpactsWhat global changes might occur if cultured meat generally replaced traditional meat products by 2050?

What effects do you think the availability of cultured meat would have on developing nations, particularlyglobal poverty and/or hunger?

6

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRB Approval Date: 1117/2013IRB Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: Wl-2

Part 4Social Indicators

Please complete part 2, 3, or 4 (or any combination) after the workshop interaction.

Please fill in values for factors of interest, indicating whether they will increase or decrease, and theimportance of change.

Factors of interest Present No cultured All cultured Importance of

state meat in 2050 meat in 2050 change

(t --~) (t --~) 1 = very important2 = important3 = trivial

Food in General

Food prices, weekly food cost of a $221 1 t 2nutritious diet, family of 4 in 2010(USCB)

Cuisine diversity (qualitative index) 100 -- l' ?Cuisine quality (qualitative index) 100 l' l' 2-Consumption, avg Cal/day (USDA) 2067 - - l' ~

Food insecure households, 2009 14.7% t I(UCSB) ~VFood system resilience (index) 100 l' f IFood system sustainability (index) 100 l' -- ,!ill ill additional factors here

Human Health

General nutrition (index) 100 l' l' 1

Overweight population, 2007-2008 67%~ ~ I(USCB)

Undernourished population (WB) 5% J ~ ILife expectancy at birth (WB) 78 .f f !Health expenditure per capita, 2009 7,578 l' J; 2-(USCB)

7

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRB Approval Date: 1117/2013IRB Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: Wl-2

Factors of interest Present No cultured All cultured Importance of

state meat in 2050 meat in 2050 change

(t --~) (t --~) 1= very important2 = important3 = trivial

Food-borne illnesses, 2011 (FoodNet) 18,964 - - J; ACancer, new cases, 2010 (USCS) 1.53 l' 1 o.

million

Suicides (mental health), per 100,000 4.9 l' f ?-persons (WB)

Family & Education

Avg family size, 2011 (USCB) 3.25 A: f 3Married population, 2011 (USCS) 48.3% ); t ?High school completion rate, 2011 85.9% f t \(USCS)

Avg SAT Critical Reading Score, 497 -- - l-2011 eIES)

Avg SAT Math Score, 2011 eIES) 514 - - - ?-Avg SAT Writing Score, 2011 eIES) 489 - - - ?-Ethics and culture

Social trust, people expressing high 49% ,-- - J; 2-level of trust in others, 2008 (OECD)

Community tolerance index of 76% 11' Y (minority groups, 2010 (OECD)

8

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRB Approval Date: 1117/2013IRB Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: WI-2

tJ

J

Factors of interest Present No cultured All cultured Importance of

state meat in 2050 meat in 2050 change

(t ---1-) (t ---1-) 1= very important2 = important3 = trivial

Demographics and GeneralStatistics

Population, 2010 (USCB) 308.7 l' f 1-million

Population growth rate (WB) 0.7% - - - J---Median age, 2010 (USCB) 37.22 l' ~ '3Urban population (WB) 44.7% l' /[' 'ANet migration (WB) 4.95 1; t )

million

Fertility rate, births per woman (WB) 2.1 ¥ ~ ::lPoverty rate, 2011 (USCB) 15.9% t J.; {Income equality, GINI index, 2011 0.475 ¥ J; 2(USCB). 0 = perfect equality; 1 =maximum inequality

Gross national income per capita 48,620 If t 2-("-" (WB)

r Labor force participation rate, 2011 64% -- --- ')-, (USCB)

~

Unemployment rate, Jan 2013 (BLS) 7.9% ~J; I

Gender equity, women's eamings as 81% 11\ f 2% of men's, 2010 (BLS)

Leisure time, avg hours per day, 2011 5.21 f ~7-

(BLS)

9

WORKSHOP QUESTIONNAIREIRB Approval Date: 1117/2013IRB Protocol #: 1301008706

Participant: WI-2

Factors of interest Present No cultured All cultured Importance of

state meat in 2050 meat in 2050 change

(t ---!-) (t ---!-) 1= very important2 = important3 = trivial

Global Impacts

Global poverty headcount ratio, 2008 22.4% f 1 I(% of people living on < $1.25 perday, WB)

Undernourished population (WB) 12.7% Jr J; J

BLS = US Bureau of Labor StatisticsIES = Institute of Educational Sciences

USCB = US Census BureauUSDA = US Department of Agriculture

WB = World Bank

10